Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • January 2026
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Posts Tagged ‘Nikki Sinclaire’

>GUEST POST re: The Rotten Core Of Nigel Farage’s Cult

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 10/11/2014

>GUEST POST re: The Rotten Core Of Nigel Farage’s Cult
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

 >GUEST POST re:

The Rotten Core Of Nigel Farage’s Cult has seemingly exposed showing just what depravity his executive are willing to stoop to in pursuit of their evil abuse of office for personal gain.

Based upon personal experience, I incline to believe this is just the tip of the iceberg!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
as is well known I have been a follower of Ukip for almost 20 years and although never a member had at one time a close relationship and some considerable influence with its leadership and others, becoming well aquainted with their corruption and increasingly aware that they did not represent ANY of the decent morals and values of the peoples of these United Kingdoms.
I have NEVER had personal political ambitions in politics and was therefore able to take action exposing the corruption of Ukip by its leadership clique and its claque as they sought vain glory for themselves, ulterior motives and enrichment.
I can not confirm all of the details in the Guest Post below but I am inclined to believe it in substance and style and have added numerous other examples, which are readily available amongst over 2,000 blog postings on this web site.
I believe that for the sake of these United Kingdoms Ukip must be cleaned-up so that they can take an active and trustworthy role in extracting Britain from the obscenely costly, odious, arcane and undemocratic EU experiment in neo communist socialism, that in enriching the few has brought misery to so many – be they the huge swathe of unemployed in Spain, the impoverished and bankrupt of Greece, the peoples of West Africa who have their food stolen from their fisheries on a daily basis by the EU fleets or the discontent in Britain of paying £Billions of tax payers’ money for absolutely no gain for the peoples of Britain, merely the enrichment of a small core of bureaucrats, businessmen and an out of touch and out of control self serving political elite and their lackeys – including the State enforcement arm represented by the Police, once servants of the people and increasingly an out of control bullying occupying army.
Ukip had a huge duty to perform but in 21 years it hasabrogated on its responsibilities and betrayed the trust of its electorate, largely genuine, decent, concerned, patriotic folk lied to and deceived by The Nigel Farage Cult and its claque.
Astonishingly in 21 years Ukip not only has failed to structure the most rudimentary of responsible, honourable exit and survival strategies to Leave_The_EU but has failed to show a single clear achievement towards moving Britain one inch closer to the exit door – Their sole achievement has been in promoting themselves to a largely gullible, ill informed and trusting electorate to build their own electoral success and income stream
Please be advised that based upon my experience of Ukip and its vile bullying, abuse of the law and lies I believe the facts, as laid out in the article below – particularly as I have seen a considerable amount of hard evidence aupporting the article and now note that DS Reardon & his oppo Galvin have recently been quite clearly destroying evidence!
It is my belief that all cases involving the police officers name should be reviewed by an outside agency as potentially unsound and that the cases against Jasna Badzak and Nikki Sinclaire are beyond doubt unsound and set aside of ALL criminal records against them in these matters, all convictions and all proceedings should be set aside and public appology made.
A great deal of good could be done for the improvement of the standing and public opinion of both police and politicians were a thorough revue and forensic accounting to be undertaken and the prosecution and incaceration of those who have set out to abuse their office and befoul British Justice be made most public.
As investigated by outside agencies that can, unlike the police and politicians can be trusted!

Serious questions have been raised about the abuse of police powers in favour of far right politicians after a whistleblower from nationalist party United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) claimed to have been framed and intimidated by police officers with extreme right sympathies.

Jasna Badzak, who worked as a press officer for senior UKIP Member of European Parliament Gerard Batten before reporting his incitements to racial hatred to the police, has revealed that she believes she was the target of a criminal conspiracy by several officers to set her up. An anonymous journalist involved in reporting Badzak’s case has since sent evidence to former Conservative MP Louise Mensch which, if true, “threaten[s] them if they wrote negative stories on Batten”.

Ms. Badzak started working for UKIP in November 2010, having previously left the Conservative Party after becoming disillusioned. She felt that accusations in the mainstream media claiming that UKIP is a racist party were overblown, but after only a few months became convinced of the party’s “racist and fascist underbelly”, as she told campaigner Lee Jasper. Batten himself is reported to be friendly with numerous extreme right groups and known anti-semites.

A known Islamophobe even amongst other party members, Batten wrote a confidential paper in 2011 addressed to a Christian group in which he argued for a ban on halal meat, outlawing Islamic banking, and forcing all Muslims to sign a code of conduct. Badzak, who had access to the draft long before it was leaked to the press earlier this year, expressed her disgust at her boss’s views to party leader Nigel Farage, who is said to have expressed sympathy but done nothing.

Jasper reports that Badzak was told by Farage that he and Batten shared “mutually destructive information on each other”, echoing an earlier comment by former party MEP Nikki Sinclair that “anyone who has ever questioned or stood up to Farage has basically been destroyed. Gerard Batten challenges Nigel and always survives. My belief is that he’s the one who Nigel puts up [with] and controls.”

Sinclaire added, “I know him and Farage don’t get on. I question how he can survive in UKIP. They’re not good friends. My only conclusion is that he controls him.”

After having her complaints within the party repeatedly ignored, Badzak eventually turned to the Metropolitan Police to report the draft, and in May 2011 she submitted further evidence of EU expenses fraud in the party, as well as of a senior UKIP member possessing child pornography. All of her complaints were handled by an officer named Detective Sergeant Shaun Reardon.

Following this reporting, Badzak and her family were repeatedly harassed and violently threatened at their home by groups of random strangers who she suspects were members of the English Defense League (EDL), the far right’s current Sturmabteilung of choice, with whose leadership Batten had previously met. Ms. Badzak reported each incident to the Metropolitan Police, all of which were also handled by Detective Sergeant Shaun Reardon. This campaign of targeted intimidation by thugs continued for 13 months without any investigation by the police, despite constant complaints.

In February 2012 Badzak attempted to seek a restraining order in court on Batten, where one Detective James Galvin testified for Batten (having embraced the MEP upon entering the courtroom). Galvin told the court that the police had no active police investigation into Batten, which was much later revealed to be a lie, as the Metropolitan Police has since admitted – but not before this resulted in Ms. Badzak’s case being dismissed.

Batten then wrote to the Metropolitan Police on October 5th 2012, reporting fraud allegations against her on UKIP letterhead – an act that Lee Jasper wrote in his blog “must constitute an attempt to politically influence the investigation”. The police responded quickly, arresting Badzak on November 29th.

The two officers arresting her were Reardon and Galvin.

After being charged with fraud on evidence which, according to Jasper “seemed incredibly flimsy” and to Mensch was “totally unsafe”, Ms. Badzak wrote to Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, demanding to know why her complaints had been ignored while Batten’s had been handled immediately. The internal Department of Professional Standards replied to inform her that the MPS employed no such named officers, and even after persisting was repeatedly told this.

Ms Badzak then wrote to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, who after some time eventually sent her the same reponse, that there were no police officers named Reardon or Galvin. Finally, she wrote to David Cameron and Boris Johnson, both of whom wrote in turn to the MPS and both of whom were told, in writing, the exact same thing. This means that the Metropolitan Police and the IPCC both misled the Prime Minister, with Jasper speculating “possibly wilfully”.

Reardon and Galvin each testified in court against Badzak, and under cross-examination said that they had “no idea” why written confirmation that they were not serving police officers had been received by Ms. Badzak, the Prime Minister, the Mayor of London and the IPCC. This was summarily ignored by the judge, who passed Ms Badzak a one-year suspended jail sentence of 28 months, around double the average sentence and an especially harsh sentence for someone with no prior convictions.

In April 2014, Badzak and Jasper were told by a police superintendent that five separate UKIP investigations were being reopened, including her complaints predating Batten’s fraud allegation. They provided the superintendent with “strong witness evidence” that two other officers, Detective Inspector Fleming and DC Tony Holden, contacted prominent journalists and threatened them with arrest if they published any negative press on UKIP – both now under investigation on suspicion of harassing journalists and potentially perverting the course of justice.

This should have brought Badzak a reprieve, now that officers suspected of abusing their powers for political purposes were being pursued, and yet in June 2014 she was contacted by Detective Sergeant Christopher Page, of the same police station as the one in which she testified against Fleming and Holden (Charing Cross). Page wanted Badzak to come in to interview about “very allegations” related to her “twitter harassment of Gerard Batten” and “talking to Lee Jasper” – who due to his anti-racism activism throughout the years is no friend to the Metropolitan Police.

It turned out that Badzak’s ‘harassment’ of her old boss had been the retweeting of an article in the Sunday Times, a respected national daily, that was critical of UKIP.

This is not the first time UKIP has called the police on someone for legitimately criticising them on Twitter. Michael Abberton, a Green Party member from Cambridgeshire, was visited in May by two country police officers after tweeting a poster against UKIP. The officers in question asked Abberton to take it down, even though they had no legal basis to do so, with Abberton later commentating that it was “not a police matter.”

Such ‘light touch’ policing may well be polite in its manner, but the lack of a mandate to do so raises questions about why it was considered worthy of police time in the first place, and under whose authority the case was pursued.

After Detective Sergeant Page threatened Ms. Badzak over the phone not to tweet against Batten or talk to Jasper, she stated for the record the following:

“UKIP is criminal fascist organization. I stand 100% behind that and under Article 10 of European Convention of Human Rights incorporated in British law as Human Rights Act 1998 I have a right to freedom of speech and there is nothing you can do about that. You can also not order me to keep quiet or not to tweet. I know you would like to silence me completely, to muzzle me but you can’t despite your telephone threat not to tweet”.

Responding to this, Page attempted to lie, denying that he threatened her in the way that she claimed – but Ms Badzak had taped the phonecall. Page is now under investigation. However, Badzak still faces an appearance in court on November 26th, and Jasper has called for the public to support her against political persecution outside West London Magistrates court that morning, launching the #Justice4Jasna hashtag on Twitter.

In the meantime, Louise Mensch has stated that she will be submitting the evidence that she has received to the Internal Police Complaints Commission, the Home Affairs Select Committee, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner and the Electoral Commission.

Throughout the weekend, Mensch tweeted that Detective Sergeant Shaun Reardon has since deleted much of his online presence, such as his LinkedIn account, and shared screenshots of the Facebook profile of Detective Sergeant James Galvin, showing several posts in support of UKIP and a meme with what appears to be anti-Irish slur. It has also emerged that the names matching that of Galvin and his wife appeared on leaked British National Party membership lists.

Mensch has pointed out in an update to this story that the actions of Galvin and Reardon, who both have clear UKIP sympathies, represent “a colossal conflict of interest” which “goes beyond any kind of politics to the very deepest, darkest abuses of our capital’s major police force against a private citizen”.

While the investigations into the abuses of these officers are ongoing, more light must be shed on several aspects of this worrying string of abuses. The rapid gains of the extreme right across Europe have coincided with an increase in the influence of fascist sympathies amongst police forces. The most chilling example is in Greece where senior police figures have raised concerns that the neo-nazi Golden Dawn has infiltrated the police and turns a blind eye to “pockets of fascism”. Given that the police have suffered numerous blows to their credibility of late, such as the fabrication of a quote that led to the dismissal of a government minister and last year’s revelation that undercover cops had stolen the birth certificates of dead infants and fathered children with activists they spied on, the onus must be on them to reassure a skeptical British public that the co-opting of state power by political extremists will not be tolerated or ignored any longer.

Finally, it is worth celebrating the bravery of Nasra Badzak in the face of three years of, at the very least, gross neglect and constant harassment by the Metropolitan Police. Had she chosen not to withstand the barrage of constant bullying, the stress of which has given her a serious heart condition, these questions about the safeguarding of freedom of speech would not now be in the public domain.

To view the original article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Gerard BATTEN, Godfrey BLOOM UKIP MEP, Jasna Badzak, Nigel FARAGE, Nikki SINCLAIRE, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ukip, an Analysis & Way Forward via HoC & FleXcit

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 01/11/2014

Ukip, an Analysis & Way Forward via HoC & FleXcit
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Ukip, an Analysis & Way Forward via The House of Commons & FleXcit with full documentation!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

as it becomes ever clearer, to the informed, that Ukip has ever more deeply significant problems beyond the sexual dalliances of its leadership in continental bordellos and employing wives and mistresses, whether past present or future, the divorce of buffoons like Roger Helmer are of little significance – with whom and where they sleep is like them, an irrelevance.

HELMER, Roger 02 - ASLEEP on The JOB 01

Clearly their much claimed populist positioning and mobilising of a ‘people’s army’ has all the ring of truth of scoundrels such as General Jackson, General Lord Dunat and others in trying to pretend that Britain’s folly of engagement by the self serving degenerate fool Tony Blair and the low grades he gathered around him trying to claim Britain’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan was other than a route, in militarty, political, economic and humanitarian terms.

Clearly it is not just Ukip tyhat is bereft of leadership and sound judgement.

Ukip however is being implausible before the even for even the poorly informed!

You will note the jingo of mobilising a ‘peoples’ army’, which has clearly stalled as shown by the failure of their Police Crime Commissioner candidate in South Yorkshire to get out any kind of vote let alone mobilise those who have not engaged politically in the past scoring a mere 4.7% of the votes of the electorate, albeit a gain on last time when Jonatyhan Arnot had a mere 16,000 or so votes, this time their candidate picked up a little by the increase of turnout from 14.5% to 14.9% and absorbing the votes of last time’s popular English Democrat candidate who did not stand this time.

Hardly mobilising a ‘peoples’ army’ though to be fair the winner with almost double the vote was the Labour candidate an Anglican priest teaching ethics at the local red brick Uni. with a meager 7.4% holding within a few hundred of the disgraced outgoing Labour incumbent; thus showing Ukip is not materially effecting Labour in their he\artlands.

Then much akin to the anti homosexual appearance of Roger Helmer’s comments and Ukip in general, particularly Nigel Farage and his close chum, at the time, Godfrey Bloom – as displayed by Nigel Farage openly denouncing Nikki Sinclaire, an openly declared homosexual subsequent to her gender reassignment, within hours of her being elected as one of his MEPs despite the fact that she went on to donate more of her own money to the Ukip cause in the following 4 montha than Farage himself has donated in 21 years!

Ukip saw a gap in the market – a new band wagon to jump on – and decided to try to increase their vote using the wide open goal and crowd from the now collapsed BNP looking for a new home by preaching a doctrine all too akin to the racist hate material published by their own MEP Gerard Batten to exploit the increase in mobility of people world wide resulting in a huge difficulty dealing with immigrants.

IMMIGRATION POLICY - EUkip 01One of Gerard Batten’s odious racist Ukip pamphlets

Ukip were dubiously backed not only by a few police officers of dubious integrity and questionable awsociates but also by a cult of extremist so called self proclaimed ‘christians’!

The mask is slipping! Part of Ukip’s propaganda was to claim that Britain was awash with immigrants but when you study the figures you find that this just isn’t true when compared witjh other countries – not wishjing to let the facts get in the way of an opportunity to make a shoddy case Ukip blamed the EU for this, yet as you will see from the facts in the chart below the argument is unsound:

EU IMMIGRATION 2014 - 01Just click on the charty for a larger version.

It is worth noting that Ukip champions the cause of leaving the EU, which is of course a sound policy, but to do so dishonestly is to cast their future to the wind!

Were Britain to Leave_The_EU it would not make a jot of difference to our immigrant levels and the fact they site Norway and Switzerland as exemplars shows how very ill informed and dishonest they are since both countries are not only outside of the EU but also have much higher levels of immigration than Britain.

To compound their folly Ukip suggest a role model of Australia as having a much better control of immigration yet where Britain currently has some 13% of our population who are immigrants Australia stands at 27%. Meanwhile although Ukip would seem to be deriving much support and attention from the opposition wing in America where interestingly it is shown to have nearly the identical immigration level to these United Kingdoms with 41M of its 313M peoples being immigrants, thus 13%!

Ukip’s dishonesty is increasingly being seen through, not to mention the3 vile nature of many in its leadership clique and its immediate claque.

One can expect Mark Reckless to be re-elected in the upcoming by election but for the life of me I see absolutely no precedent or track record of figures to show the protest vote stands any chance of seeing him hold his seat in the upcoming General Election – the turn of the wheel  when irt comes to actual achievement in Ukip to date shows that Ukip has little hope of gaining MPs at a General Election.

One may well seek to make much of their coming second in several by elections but the difference between 2nd. and 1st. is the difference between success and failure and if they are unable to produce winners in by elections with everything in their favour it seems clear that their sole achievement in a General election will be to ensure Britain NEVER leaves the EU, by destroying what little hope we have of a Referendum and compounding the catastrophe by placing Labour in Downing Street to continue the destruction of Britain they have resol;utely achieved in every other moment of folly where they were elected!

Let us hope the public wake from their somnambulent loss of faith in democracy and return to voting rather than leaving the vote to those jumping on ill informed populist band wagons.

Some reassurance may be found that although Ukip lay claim to 40,000 members they should remember at a time when the eligible electorate was far smaller Baronet Sir Oswald Moseley built up to 50,000, largely pandering to a working-class hooligan strain exploited subsequently by John Tyndall’s National Front in the 1970s in Britain, the same grouping that  Alex Salmond endeavoured to tap into in Scotland and Adolf Hitler had successfully exploited in Germany, yet in Britain as a whole Moseley spectacularly failed in electoral achievement as did Tyndall!

Clearly Ukip has failed in domestic elections to dateand without Tory turncoats and malcontents they would be as insignificant as their natural rivals in the English Defence League, Britain First, BNP, English Democrats, Greens and Monster Raving Loonies!

Ukip having spectacularly failed to come up with any plausible and costed serious policies in its 21 years, dismissing former efforts as soon as they are shown to be, to use their own leader’s description ‘drivel’ despite his having personally been in charge of policy inventing most of it ad lib to suit occasions and having personally signed off and commended their last manifesto; being only to happy to lay the blame at anyone’s door rather than shoulder the responsibility for his own ineptitude!

It looks all too likely that Nigel Farage will be squirming around in efforts to lay the blame for Ukip’s totally inaccurate immigrant policy at someone’s door unwilling to damage his income stream and career path by accepting responsibility for his actions!

In 21 years the one policy which Nigel Farage’s party has spectacularly failed to address is a responsible and honourable EU exit and survival strategy – a concept and policy document both far from populist in its required detail and obviously far beyond his or his party’s intellectual ability to produce to date – therefore I take the liberty of putting forward a suggestion that all who genuinely wish to Leave_The_EU amongst the ranks of those who have to date been duped into supporting Ukip consider adopting minded that the ONLY route to this is via referendum which can only be achieved by holding one’s nose and voting Conservative – how so ever one might vote in insignificant protest votes pending the General Election.

To that end and to help Ukip supporters understand the importance of a responsible and honourable EU exit and survival strategy I publish below an article from another blog.

.

The article which follows was first published at CLICK HERE

The House of Commons on:

Leaving The EU – 01-Jul-2013

000a Parliament 002-exi.jpgPublished yesterday by the House of Commons Library was a research paper on “leaving the EU”. The online introduction is here which offers a download facility for the entire 112-page document. For those who want to look at it without downloading, you can access it here.The paper is edited by Vaughne Miller and she tells us that the Treaty on European Union provides for a Member State to leave the EU, either on the basis of a negotiated withdrawal agreement or without one.

If the UK were to leave the EU following a referendum, Miller says, it is likely that the Government would negotiate an agreement with the EU, which would probably contain transitional arrangements as well as provide for the UK’s long-term future relations with the EU. There is no precedent for such an agreement, but it would in all likelihood come at the end of complex and lengthy negotiations.

The full impact of a UK withdrawal, she adds, is impossible to predict, but from an assessment of the current EU role in a range of policy areas, it is possible to identify issues and estimate some of the impacts of removing the EU role in these areas. The implications would be greater in areas such as agriculture, trade and employment than they would in, say, education or culture.

As to whether UK citizens would benefit from leaving the EU, Miller argues that this would depend on how the UK Government of the day filled the policy gaps left by withdrawal from the EU.

She argues that, in some areas, the environment, for example, where the UK is bound by other international agreements, much of the content of EU law would probably remain. In others, it might be expedient for the UK to retain the substance of EU law, or for the Government to remove EU obligations from UK statutes.

Much would depend, Miller concludes, on whether the UK sought to remain in the European Economic Area (EEA) and therefore continue to have access to the single market, or preferred to go it alone and negotiate bilateral agreements with the EU.

And such is the view of a senior researcher in the House of Commons Library. It is not the definitive word by any means, but it is a contribution to a complex subject, where much debate and clarification is needed. At least, it does explore the Article 50 issue, telling us that an EU-exit would not be straightforward and would involve complex and probably lengthy negotiations over the UK’s future relations with the EU.

In so doing, several of the more egregious myths are debunked. For instance, the decision to leave, we are told, does not need the endorsement or formal agreement of the other Member States. Withdrawal can happen, whether or not there is a withdrawal agreement, two years after the leaving State notifies the European Council of its intention to withdraw.

Nevertheless, we learn, the terms of Article 50 TEU imply an orderly, negotiated withdrawal, and it is clearly indicated that transitional provisions would have to be agreed, allowing EU law and obligations to continue to apply until all loose ends had been tied up. It would not be possible to withdraw immediately from several policy areas without causing enormous disruption.

In my view, such are the complications that completion of negotiations within a two-year period is unlikely, and we could see the UK – as well as the member states – looking for an extension, before a withdrawal agreement could be finalised, with any side treaties that might be needed.

For all its utility, though, the paper has some huge gaps. There is, by way of one example, virtually no recognition of the effect of globalisation of trade, and the expanding role of international standards-setting bodies which, via WTO, are largely displacing the EU as originators of trade regulation.

In this context, a paper that talks of harmonised rules on type approval of road vehicles, that does not mention UNECE and the World Forum on the Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations, must be considered severely lacking. There is much of the “little European” in the arguments adduced.

For the moment, though, the paper is probably ahead of the field, which means that many commentators will be struggling to catch up. It gets some attention from the advertising and merchandising conglomerate, the Telegraph Media Group Ltd, which offers a thin report, homing in on narrow FUD issues. One suspects its author lacks the intellectual framework with which to assess the paper properly.

But then, media interests have shown little ability to deal with the detailed issues attendant on our leaving the EU – and many of the commenters even less so. The House of Commons researchers are better equipped, although one has to say, not that much better. But their contributions do make a start to what is going to be a long haul.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Leaving the EU –

Commons Library Research Paper

INTRODUCTION

The Treaty on European Union provides for a Member State to leave the EU, either on the basis of a negotiated withdrawal agreement or without one. If the UK were to leave the EU following a referendum, it is likely that the Government would negotiate an agreement with the EU, which would probably contain transitional arrangements as well as provide for the UK’s long-term future relations with the EU. There is no precedent for such an agreement, but it would in all likelihood come at the end of complex and lengthy negotiations.

The full impact of a UK withdrawal is impossible to predict, but from an assessment of the current EU role in a range of policy areas, it is possible to identify issues and estimate some of the impacts of removing the EU role in these areas. The implications would be greater in areas such as agriculture, trade and employment than they would in, say, education or culture.

As to whether UK citizens would benefit from leaving the EU, this would depend on how the UK Government of the day filled the policy gaps left by withdrawal from the EU. In some areas, the environment, for example, where the UK is bound by other international agreements, much of the content of EU law would probably remain. In others, it might be expedient for the UK to retain the substance of EU law, or for the Government to remove EU obligations from UK statutes.

Much would depend on whether the UK sought to remain in the European Economic Area (EEA) and therefore continue to have access to the single market, or preferred to go it alone and negotiate bilateral agreements with the EU.

To view This HoC Briefing Paper Introduction CLICK HERE

To Download the full Government Report

Leaving the EU (PDF PDF, 112 pages, 1.23 MB) Opens in a new window

 

To view The FleXcit web site for more information CLICK HERE

To read the Full FleXcit Plan, so far, CLICK HERE

.
Regards,

Greg_L-W.
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in FleXcit, Gerard BATTEN, House of Commons, Nigel FARAGE, Roger Helmer, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ex Ukip MEP Facing Further Criminal Charges

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 13/10/2014

Ex Ukip MEP Facing Further Criminal Charges
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Ex Ukip MEP Ashley Mote is Facing Further Criminal Charges including ‘Misconduct in Public Office‘, ‘Fraud’ etc. amounting to 9 charges, to be heard at Westminster Magistrates Court on 03-Nov-2014.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
having observed some very questionable decisions of the CPS over recent times and the abject failure of OLAF in the EU and CPS in Britain to bring to book criminals in public office – be they the likes of MEP Giles Chichester who used somewhere in excess of £100K from the public purse to fund his ‘Letts’ diary business, the failure to prosecute Nigel Farage and his cronies for what seems to be abuse of office, self enrichment, the enrichment of their low life cronies thus bringing the body politic into disrepute, the failure to prosecute Ukip MEP Derek Clark for abuse of office and misuse of somewhere between £35K & £100K, nor prosecution of Ukip MEPs Stuart Agnew, Nigel Farage, Jeffrey Titford, David Bannerman, Graham Booth and probably others for both known and publicly identified misuse of public funding – not to mention what would seem to be a number of ‘stitch ups’ endorsed by The CPS.
Yet there has also been a serial failure on the part of The CPS structure to bring to Court and prosecute a considerable number of police officers who have been involved in various crimes not least of which have been numerous outrageous murders!
Hence I am sure readers will understand why I am more than a little sceptical of the integrity of the 9 charges brought against Ashley Mote the ex Ukip MEP!I make no claims of innocence for Ashley Mote relative to these charges as The CPS has all too often over egged their claims and a great deal more details are required before any responsible judgement of the claims can be made.
I wonder will this be just another crass series of claims cobbled together from lies, inuendo and misrepresentation as would seem the case against Jasna Badsak and that against Nikki Sinclaire where it would seem corruption of due process has played a significant part in the hands of what would seem to be corrupt police and dubious judiciary too closely associated with Ukip and other parties in the case yet lacking the integrity to prorogue themselves!
One is forced to wonder why some are harassed and persecuted over paltry sums, eg Badzak £2K and Sinclaire less than £15K (in reality at most around £8K alleged!) whilst others never face prosecution over infinitely larger sums purloined?
Is this what British Justice has debased itself to under the influence of EU Corpus Juris?
Let us see more details regarding the claims against the retired 78 year old Ashley Mote so long after the offences would seem to be alleged
MOTE, Ashley 02

Ex-MEP charged with fraud offences and misconduct in public office

13/10/2014

Zoe Martin, of the CPS Special Crime Division said, “The CPS has today issued charges against Ashley Mote of obtaining a money transfer by deception, fraud by false representation, false accounting, receiving the proceeds of crime and misconduct in public office. We have decided there is sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is in the public interest.

“Ashley Mote will appear before Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 3 November 2014.

“A decision has also been made that no further action will been taken in relation to a second individual who was investigated for offences of obtaining money transfer by deception, false accounting and fraud by false representation, as there is insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction. In addition no further action will be taken against two other individuals who were investigated for offences of money laundering.

“These decisions were taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors.

“May I remind all concerned that criminal proceedings against the defendant have been commenced and of his right to a fair trial. It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.

“Any decision by the CPS does not imply any finding concerning guilt or criminal conduct; the CPS makes decisions only according to the test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors and it is applied in all decisions on whether or not to prosecute.”

Note:

The CPS’s function is not to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges for the criminal court to consider. The CPS assessment of any case is not in any sense a finding of, or implication of, any guilt or criminal conduct. It is not a finding of fact, which can only be made by a court, but rather an assessment of what it might be possible to prove to a court, in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors.

This assessment is based on the evidence available arising out of the police investigation and not on the evidence that is likely to be gathered by the defence, and likely to be used to test the prosecution evidence. The CPS charging decision is therefore necessarily an assessment on the basis of the evidence that is available to the CPS at the time the decision is made.

CPS prosecutors must also keep every case under review, so that they take account of any change in circumstances that occurs as the case develops, including what becomes known of the defence case. If appropriate, the CPS may change the charges or stop a case.

Details of the full charges:

Ashley Mote

  • Charge 1: Misconduct in public office, contrary to Common Law
  • Charge 2: Acquiring criminal property, contrary to section 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
  • Charge 3: Obtaining a money transfer by deception, contrary to section 15A of the Theft Act 1968
  • Charge 4: False accounting, contrary to section 17(1)(a) of the Theft Act 1968
  • Charge 5: Obtaining a money transfer by deception, contrary to section 15A of the Theft Act 1968
  • Charge 6: Obtaining a money transfer by deception, contrary to section 15A of the Theft Act 1968
  • Charge 7: False accounting, contrary to section 17(1)(a) of the Theft Act 1968
  • Charge 8: False accounting, contrary to section 17(1)(a) of the Theft Act 1968
  • Charge 9: Fraud, contrary to section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006

Ends

To view the original of these charges CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Ashley Mote, CPS, David Bannerman, Derek CLARK, Farage Cult, Fraud, Graham Booth, Greg Lance-Watkins, Jasna Badzak, Nigel FARAGE, Nikki SINCLAIRE, Stuart AGNEW, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

From That Which I KNOW of This Case I Believe It Is Corupt

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 17/09/2014

From That Which I KNOW of This Case I Believe It Is Corupt
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

From That Which I KNOW of This Case I Believe It Is Corupt, not least because it pertains to activity years ago & justice this delayed is NOT justice!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
minded that during the period in question ALL Ukip MEPs accounts were under the direct scrutiny of Nigel Farage’s directly appointed staff and the details known of the dishonesty of sometime Ukip appointee staff member John Ison I am of the informed belief that in reality there is no case to answer for Nikki Sinclaire who has seemingly been set up!
It is also proven public knowledge that senior members of Farage’s leadership team have frequently lied about Nikki Sinclaire and Nigel Farage and Ukip have more than once been found guilty of af abuse of Nikki Sinclaire, whilst one time Ukip deputy leader and MEP Mike Nattrass acted on uncorroborated information supplied by the liar John Ison who worked in collusion with Nigel Farage’s sewer rat Mark Croucher!
That all three members of Nikki Ainclaire’s staff who were arrested originally based on the false premise of acting to money launder for Nikki Sinclaire were released with no case to answer despite their names being made public, yet no public appology was made by the police.
Further the false claim of money laundering accounted for around half of the police allegations.
Further the EU whom the police belatedly claim were defrauded by Sinclaire has made no complaint and seemingly has provided no evidence to support the West Midland’s police claims which it took them 29 months to construct.
It is also a matter of public record that Nikki Sinclaire’s auditted accounts show that she has paid in in cash, of her own money, to do her job and carry out her political campaigning during the period in question in very substantial excess of the sums she is, in my opinion, falsely accused of stealing!
Knowing thwe willingness of Ukip’s leade4rship team to lie to satiate their personal ambitions and personal enrichment and also their proven association with certain police officers that are believed to be corrupt I incline to believe that this entire case is a tissue of lies – that is not to say that she will not be found guilty and even spend time in prison.
Such an outcome would not surprise in our country where democracy is dead viz the fact that only 4% of the electorate have had a say in the possible destruction of these United Kingdoms and in a desperate attempt and without any democratic debate both Labour & Tory leaders have made promises to buy the result of Scotland’s independence vote. without ANY Parliamentary debate or mandate!
We are, as the last Government constantly claimed, living in a post democratic era – clearly one in which the occupying forces of the supra national state have an utterly corrupt police force which has never brought to justice on a murder charge one of its own who has chosen to slaughter a citizen on the street with lethal force in direct contrtavention of British law which prohibits a death penalty for ANY crime.
Further let us remember that irrefutable fact that the police have proved they are prepared to liue to defend their own criminal members and select which crimes they will or will not prosecute viz Rotheram police failure to defend children from industrial level sexual abuse known to them in their capacity as ‘Law Enforcement’ a term the modern police  bring shame upon – just as Bailiffs act outside of the law to steal goods, often far in excess of the value of any debt claimed!
I do not believe that the alleged case against Nikki Sinclaire has any more validity than the pack of lies presented regarding Jasna Badzak and that the case is just as corrupt as were the lies and allegations regarding me made by Ukip MEP Gerard Batten and his police puppets – one wonders if Batten also abused his position to make enquiries with Interpol to further his lies regarding me as he did regarding Jasna Badzak!
It would seem a great evil stalks the body politic and its name is Ukip who IF they ever reached any real position of authority could, based upon their track record, be expectedf to abuse that authority and participate in industrial level corruption and obscene levels of abuse and bullying using their dishonestly obtained office for personal gain!
I believe that Nikki Sinclaire is and has consistently been abused by Ukip and is innocent of any charge of deliberate instances of fraud – misrepresented by the police as ‘Money Laundering’ to make the offence seem greater – ‘Money Laundering’ is an offence specifically designed to deal with drug and terrorist processing of cash and also the proceeds of major criminals.
It is clear that the police claims are dressed up to make them seem greater than they actually might have been had they ever occurred and IF they occurred there would seem to be no connection with Nikki Sinclaire but much to do with the original crimes Nikki Sinclaire personally reported to the police long before her arrest! Crimes that would have proved to be embarrassing to Ukip and the Farage leadership team!

Former MEP Nikki Sinclaire appears in court on fraud charges

Former MEP Nikki Sinclaire appears in court on fraud charges

First published 09:21 Wednesday 17 September 2014 in News by Gema Bate

A FORMER West Midlands MEP will appear before magistrates today (Wednesday, September 17) accused of money laundering offences after an inquiry into her expense claims.

Nikki Sinclaire, who lost her seat in the European Parliament earlier this year, also faces an allegation of committing misconduct in a public office.

Sinclaire was charged in July this year after a long-running inquiry by West Midlands Police and the European Anti-Fraud Office.

Two of the three charges against Sinclaire, brought under the Proceeds of Crime Act, allege that she converted criminal property between October 2009 and December 2010.

Prosecutors further allege that Sinclaire committed misconduct between October 2009 and July 2010 “in that she made or caused to be made” false and dishonest claims for travelling expenses.

Sinclaire lost her seat as an MEP for the West Midlands in last May’s European elections after leaving Ukip and standing for the We Demand a Referendum Now party.

The 45-year-old, who lives in Shirley, near Solihull, has described the allegations as “ludicrous and unfounded”.

In a statement issued in July, Sinclaire said: “I strongly refute these charges and will be firmly defending myself.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Gerard BATTEN, Nigel FARAGE, Nikki SINCLAIRE, Police Corruption, Police State, Scotland, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST: Ukip, the Metropolitan Police Service and high corruption .

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 03/09/2014

>GUEST POST:
Ukip, the Metropolitan Police Service and high corruption .

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Members of the Ukip leadership team have seemingly been colluding with corrupt members of the Metropolitan Police Service and the Judiciary in high corruption.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

sadly this is not only all too plausible, but having been subject of Ukip lies and aware of just how dishonest, corrupt and vituperative they can be, I incline to believe the full basis of Lee Jasper‘s reporting of the facts in the case of the abuse of Jasna Badzak.

Ukip are not only unfit for purpose they are a disgrace to the body politic and as self serving and evil as the war criminals Tony Blair & his cabinet and as destructive to Britain as Alex Salmond has been for Scotland – and all in pursuit of their own vain glory and enrichment!

Regards,
Greg_L-W

UKIP, the Metropolitan Police Service and high corruption .

Over the past year or so, I have found myself in the rather strange position of supporting a woman, originally a staunch Tory, who defected to UKIP and has now returned, to the Tory party fold.  

For me, a black, socialist activist, who is usually to be found defending poor people, facing institutional racism and gross injustice, this was very strange territory, indeed.

In the course our discussions it became apparent to men that Jasna appeared to be the victim of a concerted, organised smear campaign designed to completely discredited her, led by leading members of UKIP.

What makes this case so compelling is their appears to be a strong prime facie evidence, of the existence of a small cell of UKIP supporters, certainly based within the Metropolitan Police Service, maybe within the Crown Prosecution Service and the possibly the Judiciary.

I can’t say for certain what’s going on, but my long experience and professional instinct, tells me that there is something rotten at the core of this peculiar and often bizarre story.

An uncommon friendship.

BADZAK, Jasna 01Jasna Badzak is a former press officer for UKIP. She started work for Nigel Farage and Gerard Batten MEP in November 2010 and around a year ago; she was convicted of defrauding UKIP of some two thousand five hundred pounds in October 2013. Around a year ago Jasna rang me, seeking support for what she claimed, was a miscarriage of justice.

I was intrigued and decided to meet Jasna. I must confess, on one level I was definitely interested in anything that might expose UKIP, a party infested with racists. On the other hand, I was simply curious as to what an ex Ukipper and former, now returned to the fold true blue Tory, could possibly want to see me, of all people, about?

We met on a lovely spring day over coffee. Jasna, arrived, a tall woman with definite sense of fashion. We chatted and she told me a little of her background. She had fled former Yugoslavia as a refugee some 20 years ago. Her family includes Nazi holocaust victims.

She had reached out to me in desperation, hoping that I may be able to see the injustice she had suffered and help her in some way. The stress she was suffering was clearly etched in her face but what struck me was her determination and obvious strength of character. She intrigued me.

Jasna began to tell me her story and what I heard amazed me. As an experienced campaigner, in my time I’ve heard some outlandish conspiracy theories and what I heard that day, would shock me to the core.

A criminal conspiracy.

Jasna believed she was the victim of a possible criminal conspiracy to set her up, orchestrated she suspected by Gerard Batten MEP in an alliance with officers within the Metropolitan Police Service, aided by the Crown Prosecution Service and the Judiciary. I had to ask the obvious question; How is it, she didn’t know that UKIP was a racist party?

BATTEN, Gerard 11

Gerad Batten MEP 

She told me that when she joined UKIP, she assumed the accusations of racism, were just the overblown claims of a hostile press. However as the months passed she became increasingly concerned. Once she read the draft of Gerard Battens UKIPs Charter for Muslim Understanding, Dismantling Multiculturalism, a rancid and deeply disturbing document, that amongst other things, required all Muslims to be required to sign a code of conduct,

At that point she was left in no doubt about the core beliefs of UKIP and the awful truth dawned on her. From then on, she knew precisely what Gerard Batten was all about and she was rightly appalled and disgusted.

BADZAK, Jasna 02 with FARAGE

Confronted with claims of racism Farage did nothing 

Naively, she began to complain bitterly to Nigel Farage whom she assumed would share her disgust about Batten’s obvious racism. She told me that although Farage was both frustrated and apparently sympathetic, in the end, Farage did nothing.  

Jasna told me that Farage had eventually told her, that nothing could be done as he and Batten shared ‘mutually destructive information about each other’, that ultimately meant that Gerard Batten couldn’t be touched.

That would certainly explain why Farage, a politically savvy operator, has long tolerated Batten. Good sense and political expediency suggests he should have been sacked, representing as he does, a distinct and dangerous electoral liability. I suspect that Farage failed to act because he fundamentally shares Battens deeply offensive views.

As a social justice campaigner, I’ve been around long enough to know, that sometimes such claims, can be claims the product of mental health conditions such as deep delusion or depression, paranoia or conspiracy theory fanatics.

Nevertheless, I listened intently to her story and though I was very skeptical of her claims and not entirely sympathetic, given her politics, nevertheless she struck a chord with me.

What I concluded was here was a deeply damaged, credible and sincere woman, whose life has been utterly destroyed, the victim of what appeared to be false and malicious accusation and a concerted smear campaign. Her character, her demeanor and steely determination to prove her innocence and expose UKIP racism and corruption impressed me. I knew what she was taking on in seeking to challenge her perceived injustice.

Going up against UKIP, Farage, Batten and the police, was very brave thing to do. Putting aside my own political prejudice, I decided I should explore her claims further.

What she told me that day blew me away. Transcending party politics, we connected on a human level, as two people who shared a commitment to challenging injustice. Jasna experience in Yugoslavia cemented her hatred of racism and fascism. She knew first hand the dangers of allowing racism and fascism to take root. I did however had to let a wry smile slip, when she told me of her previous role on Boris Johnsons 2008 Mayoral campaign.

Despite my obvious reservations, what was absolutely crystal clear to me was there were several unexplained facts, which gave some credibility to her claims. Whilst at that stage I did not agree with some of her conclusions, I had to agree that something’s just didn’t add up.

Here I must apologies in advance of the length of this article. It’s a complex story and necessarily needs some detailed explaining, but bear with me dear reader, it’ll be worth it.

First, it’s important to understand the sequence of events that preceded and then led up to Jasna’s eventual arrest.

Background.

Ukip logo + Farage

Jasna started work for UKIP in November 2010 after defecting from the Tories. By the spring of 2011 Jasna discovered, what she describes as the ‘racist and fascist underbelly’ of UKIP. She says that UKIP was producing material she believed, constituted a criminal offense i.e. incitement to racial hatred. She was aware that Gerard Batten was meeting with European extreme right wing racists. She was also concerned at what she described as ‘ monumental EU expenses fraud’ taking place within UKIP.

Here in the UK, she became increasingly aware of Battens association with the now, all but defunct, English Defense League and British National Party. With the evidence mounting Jasna was so concerned that she made a number of official complaints to the Met, citing what she believed, were a range of potentially serious criminal offences.

In March 2011 she formally complained to the Met, that the Charter of Muslim Understanding and Dismantling Multiculturalism taken in concert with Battens association with extreme racist and fascist’s organisation, constituted a clear incitement to racial hatred.

As UKIP press officer, Jasna claims that, over time, her day-to-day work experience proved beyond any doubt that UKIP was both a ‘racist and proto fascist party’. In May that year she provided the police solid evidence that backed up her UKIP EU expenses fraud allegations. That same month she reported another leading member of UKIP for possession of child pornographic images.

Annabelle Fuller 

Finally in July 2011 she then provides a devastating witness statement that alleges that UKIP Annabelle Fuller, Nigel Farage’s personal press officer, knowingly made false allegations of sexual attack in relation to Tory MP Andrew Bridgen.

db128-annabelle-fuller

Violent intimidation.

It was then that Jasna and her family then begin to suffer direct violent intimidation. From October 2011 to November 2012 she intermittently endures a series of visits to her home, by random groups of strangers, who threatened her and her son. She believes that this was organised harassment by EDL supporters with whom Batten was meeting seeking an EDL/UKIP alliance.

She reported this intimidation to the Met and was surprised to find out that yet again these complaints were being refereed to a Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon, the very same officer who had failed to investigate her initial complaints of UKIP racism and EU fraud.

Worried about escalating violent intimidation and seeking to cope with her own failing health, Jasna then seeks a restraining order court injunction against Batten in Feb 2012.

Met officer supports UKIP.

Here’s where the begins to get interesting, MPS Detective James Galvin turns up at court, embraces Gerard Batten proceeds to tell the court that the MPS has no record of any allegations against Batten nor were there any current, active police investigation into him. That was a lie and, as the MPS has now admitted Galvin, had no authority to represent the Met or attend court. Her case was eventually dismissed as a result.

Gerard Batten, then formally wrote to the MPS on October 5th 2012 reporting his fraud allegations against Jasna. He actually wrote his allegation on UKIP letterhead, which must constitute and attempt to politically influence the investigation. The Met having failed to investigate any of Jasna serious previous allegations, then acted immediately upon receipt of Battens complaints. .

Jasna was subsequently arrested on 29th November 2011, when surprise, surprise, Detectives Constable James Galvin and Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon both, attended her home. They wanted to arrest her there and then, but she Jasna was so ill, it was decided to take her to hospital instead.

The Met formally denies the existence of two serving police officers misleading the Prime Minister David Cameron.

https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/6f810-scotland-yard5b15d.jpg

Subsequent to her eventual arrest and charging, Jasna wrote to the Met Commissioner Bernard Hogan Howe asking, why her many complaints to the MPS had not been investigated? This was in sharp and total contrast to the Mets, swift and immediate response to Battens complaint.

This lead to another key question, why had DC Galvin had turned up at the injunction hearing, defending Batten?  

The answer, when it came, was as shocking as it was unexpected. The Mets Department of Professional Standards informed her that the Metropolitan Police Service employed no such named police officers. Shocked and alarmed she persisted and again she was told again that no such officers were employed by the Met.

She then wrote to the Independent Police Compliant Commission who after some time, wrote back, confirming, that after discussions with the Met, they too can confirm that no such officers existed.

https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/04c98-images.jpeg

Jasna at this stage was completely frustrated and wrote to Mayor of London, Boris Johnson and Prime Minister David Cameron.Both then wrote to the Met and both were told, in writing, that no such officers worked for the Met.

Prime Minister was mislead. 

The fact is the Prime Minister, the Mayor of London and the IPCC, were mislead and possibly willfully mislead, by the Met DPS about the existence of these two officers. 

This begs they very important questions as to precise circumstances that led to two of the most senior Tory politicians in the land were provided with inaccurate and misleading information?

I then looked at the evidence against Jasna and came to conclusion that the prosecution evidence seemed incredibly flimsy. The only evidence offered was a bank statement, which Jasna is alleged to tampered with, she denied this allegation and points to the timing noted on her on line bank statement that indicated that both statements offered in evidence were printed off within one second of each other.

Evidence produced in court proved that Jasna logged on to her bank account at exactly 8:11:02 and her bank statement was printed 8:11:03 as recorded on her computer and accepted by the police. Did she really amend her own bank statement in one second?  Unlikely to say the least.

Jasna has consistently contended that she was the victim of malicious counter complaint by Batten as a result of whistle blowing about UKIP’s racism and EU expenses abuse. Further she told me that the EU always paid late and they never knew from one month to the next, when they would get paid. Batten and UKIP at that time were in the eye of a media storm focusing on the racism of their candidates. As a result UKIP were in utter disarray and an administrative shambles.

She points to this culture of incompetence and confusion by way of explanation. In short, this was an administrative error and as soon she realised she offered to pay the full amount back. This was rejected in favour of prosecution. In addition and hampering her ability to defend herself in the months prior and after her arrest Jasna was recovering from major heart surgery.

Another interesting fact was that her court date was brought forwarded, because the lead investigation Metropolitan Police Officer, Mr. Shaun Reardon’s reported that his father was near imminent death.

This change of date resulted in the case being heard by Recorder Michael Gledhill (Recorder therefore not a fully fledged Judge)

These things happen, you might say, however we were to learn later, that this Recorder had a direct connection to Gerard Batten MEP, which he failed to declare. He should have dismissed himself once he knew the detail of the case was and the identity of the defendant.

It would later transpire that Gledhill has consistently worked as an barrister alongside Gerard Batten’s best friend, the deeply homophobic and Islamaphobic Paul Diamond, on a range cases for the Christian fundamentalists extremist organisation, Christian Concern or Christian Voice, such as the seeking actions to close down the West End musical Jerry Springer: The Opera. Christian Concern is an organization that has an extremely close alliance with UKIP.

Gledhill, during this most extraordinary trial made a series of political and factually incorrect statements and seemed hell bent on securing a conviction.

During the trial, he wrongly alleged that Jasna was a serious criminal wanted in a number of EU states. This was factually incorrect and without foundation. Jasna was a person of good character, without previous convictions or even any minor civil infringements and had been in the past whilst in Yugoslavia,working for the British Foreign Office and had been in possession of highest security clearance

Gledhill, in an unprecedented outburst for a Recorder, went further and praised UKIPs Charter of Muslim Understanding and Dismantling Multiculturalism that contained proposals to ban the religions of both Islam and Judaism. He described this charter for racism as ‘perfectly reasonable documents anybody would agree with’. These deeply offensive reports were to subsequently appear on the front pages of a range of national newspapers, condemned as racist and echoing fascist politics in both tone and tenor,

This document was rightly condemned by a broad range of national newspapers and was subsequently condemned by all serious British Parliamentarians.

Gledhill also then suggested that Jasna was mentally ill and ordered a psychiatric evaluation (which subsequently proved Jasna was quite sane). With virtually no substantive evidence and under challenge from Jasna’s Counsel, Gledhill refused to dismiss the case. 

Then to Jasna’s total surprise, the very same officers who we had previously been told, did not work for the Met, DC James Galvin and DS Shaun Reardon appeared in the Court and testified against the Jasna.

At the trial they said they had no idea why we, the PM, the Mayor and the IPCC had received written confirmation that they were not serving police officers. They produced their warrant cards and Gledhill simply dismissed the matter.

After a three days trial, Gledhill began to sum up to the jury. What happened next proved to be yet another extraordinary twist in this complex tale. Gledhill’s summing up went on went for an incredible two hours, thirty minutes during which he pressed the jury to find Jasna guilty. When printed this summing up ran onto 78 pages of transcript. The jury, after being pummeled into submission by the Recorder found Jasna guilty by majority verdict after 2 days of deliberating.

0n the 7th October 2013 she was given a 1-year suspended jail sentence for 2 years and 4 months, plus an unsupervised curfew order. For a woman with no previous convictions this sentence seems excessively harsh. This gives to rise to the serious question of whether Jasna court date was actually moved to ensure that a judge sympathetic to UKIP would hear the case?

Why did Gledhill not declare a conflict of interest in this case given his strong association with Paul Diamond, Christian Concern and UKIP?

TOWLER, Gawain 05 advert

That same day as the verdict was announced, Gawain Towler, UKIP Chief Press Officers feeds inaccurate stories to Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail to further destroy Jasna now battered credibility.

In January 2014 Jasna Badzak then receives a written witness statement from UKIP insider, stating that Batten had been openly boasting, of stitching up Jasna Badzak for fraud in order to destroy her credibility, as well as reporting that Gawain was heard boasting about the coverage the story received. He is reported to have said he was pleased at the reception of the article he had actually wrote in September 2012, almost a year prior to Jasna’s conviction.

The Met finally takes action against suspected officers with links to UKIP.

During the spring of 2014 I start raising questions and highlighting the details of this case. I conducted a long radio interview with Jasna and started tweeting my concerns and my general support for her. Then in March 2014 Jasna is suddenly contacted by Superintendent David R Manning from Charing Cross police station who indicates that they are intending to now act on Jasna earlier complaints, that pre dated Battens fraud allegation and were now reopening a total of five separate UKIP investigations.

The following month both Jasna and I attend Charing Cross Police Station where we are told that the Met now plans to open a formal police investigation in conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice against DC James Galvin, DS Shaun Reardon.

Subsequently we have found out that DC James Galvin appears to be a member of UKIP and has attended UKIP rally.  His name is also on leaked BNP list as well as name of his wife
At this meeting we gave the MPS additional evidence in relation to a Detective Inspector Fleming and another officer, DC Tony Holden. We had strong witness evidence that both contacted prominent journalists threatening them with arrest if they published any negative stories about UKIP. This group of officers is now being investigated on suspicion of the harassment of journalists, perverting the Course of Justice and there may be a possibility of abuse of office by Recorder Michael Gledhill.

Met police harassment continues despite their assurances.

Then in June 2014, Jasna while at the cardiologist and attached to an ECG, Jasna receives series of emails DS Christopher Page sent to Badzak’s lawyer Atkins ordering her to surrender herself by 10 July 2014 to Charring Cross Police station to answer ‘very serious allegations’. This date also happened to be Jasna’s son’s 16th birthday adding to the family’s harassment and distress.

Later she receives a telephone call from the DS Christopher Page again demanding she come in for interview under caution for the ‘twitter harassment of Gerard Batten’. 

Jasna is then called to a meeting with the Mets, Department of Professional Standards with Inspector Fran Polllard and DS Helen Thomas. Superintendent Manning was relived and replaced by these two officers. We are told later that Manning had been moved after Bernard Hogan-Howe received direct orders from MOPAC and Boris Johnson to get to the bottom of this case.

Jasna and Atkins attend police interview under caution with DS Christopher Page.  DS Page full of himself reads MIRANDA to Badzak and then hands over to Graham Atkins A4 page note containing following statement:

 “Jasna Badzak has been harassing Gerard Batten with false newspaper stories, tweets that he stole £51k with help of Police in January, 09 May 2014 article in Sunday Times saying perverting the course of Justice, tweets about Islamophobia, lies about Batten attending 1st Counter Jihad Conference in Brussels in 2007 and talking to Lee Jasper.”

Jasna solicitor Graham Atkins stunned at the nature of the accusation asks for disclosure. Page refuses saying that is only disclosure he will get. Page asks Jasna about background to Batten’s complaint.  Refusing to be intimidated Jasna states for the record

‘UKIP is criminal fascist organization.  I stand 100 % behind that and under Article 10 of European Convention of Human Rights incorporated in British law as Human Rights Act 1998 I have a right to freedom of speech and there is nothing you can do about that.  You can also not order me to keep quiet or not to tweet.  I know you would like to silence me completely, to muzzle me but you can’t despite your telephone threat not to tweet’. 

Page then lies, saying that he never ordered Jasna not to tweet about Batten. Fortunately Jasna recorded his telephone call and tells a stunned Page that she has irrefutable evidence that he did order her not to tweet about Batten or talk to me. Page is immediately subject to an investigation

Conclusion.

In summary, I suspect that there may have been an active conspiracy involving members of UKIP, Metropolitan Police Service, possibly the judiciary to falsely criminalise and character assassinate Jasna Badzak. If true this would represent the most serious threat to the very basis of our democracy and law and order.

Should it be that UKIP members or sympathisers in statutory agencies are conspiring together to criminalise, harass and intimidate people UKIP disagree with, then this would require the most urgent intervention from the Home Secretary and the Prime Minister.

Along with the Plebgate revelations of deep systemic corruption within the MPS, this case raises the most profound concerns about the nature and accountability of the Metropolitan Police Service. If Police Officer’s are engaged in targeting moderate political activists from both the left and right, then that has to be an issue of acute concern for us all.

With evidence of the Met spying on families campaigning for justice such as the Stephen Lawrence, Sukedv Reel or Rolan Adams families to name just a few, the Plebgate incident, undercover officers having sexual relations, fathering children in the line of duty alongside rampant institutional racism and the routine abuse of stop and search powers, such allegations if proven, would be so serious as to require the resignation of the Commissioner and Deputy Mayor Stephen Greenhalgh.

We will await the outcome of the Mets internal disciplinary investigations. Such investigations have no real credibility with police investigating themselves and we believe there is strong and compelling case for IPCC to conduct an independent investigation into these matters.

The Met, The Mayor and the Lord Chancellor Office really need to answer the serious questions raised by this incredible tale. Whatever our personal politics, I think we can all agree, this case raises fundamental questions and there is a strong and compelling case to answer.

  • Nikki Sinclaire, a former UKIP MEP who left the EFD fascist group in the EU Parliament because she disagreed with sitting with fascists and has been very vocal critic of UKIP was arrested in January 2012 and charged 23 July 2014, as soon as she changed lawyer to Graham Atkins.  

    We believe that arresting officer in this case Officer DC Paul Griffiths may be a member of UKIP.

    Lee Jasper

    To view the original of this article CLICK HERE.

    Regards,

    Greg_L-W..

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
     

     INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

    &
    Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
    Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
    Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
    Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
    .
    to Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

    Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

    tel: 01594 – 528 337
    Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
    Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
    DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
    Also:
    Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
    UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
    Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
    General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
    General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
    Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
    TWITTER: Greg_LW

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

    &

    To Leave-The-EU
     

    Posted in Gerard BATTEN, Jasna Badzak, Lee Jasper, Nigel FARAGE, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

    >GUEST POST: An Open Letter To Douglas Carswell from Jasna Badzak

    Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 01/09/2014

    >GUEST POST: An Open Letter To Douglas Carswell from Jasna Badzak
    .

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    &
    Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

    .

    The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
    their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

    is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

    .

    >GUEST POST:
    An Open Letter of warning To Douglas Carswell from a former Tory & Ukip insider in Nigel Farage’s clique, Jasna Badzak
    .

    .

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
    .

    WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN BEING IN UKIP as NIGEL FARAGE’S SHINING STAR? 


    I BELIEVE DOUGLAS
    CARSWELL IS MAKING THE BIGGEST MISTAKE IN HIS LIFE

     

    An Honest Warning to anyone, regardless of their political orientation, who is thinking to join UKIP

     
    I am writing you from the depth of my heart, with absolute honesty and no agenda other than not wishing to see my worst enemy repeat the biggest mistake of my life, joining UKIP.
     
    I am former Conservative Ward Chair woman in the prime Westminster North Constituency.  I was in the 2005 Conservative by-election a Council candidate, I was also a very active member of the Executive of my local Association and Vice Chair of the Policy Forum.
     
    I fought and was very successful contributor in Conservative elections, local, European, Mayoral and General.  I met David Cameron, George Osborne, I also worked closely with Boris Johnson on his successful campaign to oust Livingstone as Mayor of London, I was instrumental in taking a solid Labour Ward and making it for the first time in history Conservative, with an over 65% swing etc etc.
     
    Then came the controversial and infamous Conservative A list, Noting Hill set, ‘their policies’ of a close circle and not an inch of all the Conservative party, I loved and cherished was abandoned.
     
    I did not go into politics to seek keys to 10 Downing Street or preferment on any level but for a more ‘selfish reason’! 
    I am a former refugee who fled the war in my homeland in 1993 and came to the UK, I was welcomed into this country and was given the opportunity to rebuild my life, to get further education, to work, to bring up my son and to enjoy a peaceful life.  I was so grateful that as soon as I was able to stand on my own two feet I wanted to give back something to the community that welcomed me, despite the fact I was not born here, my family didn’t build cities here nor did they contribute here. 
    My own country where my family did all those things for centuries had become untenable for me and had kicked me out and UK opened door to me.  For that alone I will be eternally grateful.
    I soon began doing community work, setting up Resident’s Association, sitting on Police Consultative Groups and above all helping the disadvantaged.  When faced with issues of how to help those who are homeless, of those who have extremely sick children and similar issues I found I had to ask for political help.  So I became involved in the politics to gain connections to help me to help others.  That was my ‘selfish’ reason to choose to become involved in politics.
     
    As a Tory I never had a problem with any other normal party, Labour, LibDems, Greens.  I worked and cooperated with all of them on the local issues and whenever issues affecting community arose. 
    Yes, I fought them during election times, but I had no problem working with them.  I still have a Labour MP and she is a wonderful woman.  In my opinion all these legitimate political parties are full of people like me, people who are doing their best for the love of their communities.  The only difference being the ways we think we can achieve that ultimate goal of creating better lives for all.
     
    In 2008 my whole ward got fed up with ‘A’ lists, puff policies, imposed Oxbridge candidates clueless of politics, lazy, no interest in community work and I with many others left the Conservatives.  We did not defect to any other party but just resigned en masse.  It was then that we were approached by other parties, and I made the biggest mistake of my life and joined UKIP.  At that time I thought that UKIP are just old Conservative Party with rather more Eurosceptic views.
     
    Initially, much like Mr Carswell himself, I was welcomed with open arms.  Nigel Farage was fawning over me (I have the pictures to prove it), there was press coverage, I was a ‘shining star’.  In 2010 I was even  made to be candidate for the 2nd target seat, after Nigel Farage’s, and was one of the selected few, at the UKIP Campaign launch, to be shown to the media at 4 Millbank. 
    Yes, Mr Carswell I was in your shoes, before you.
     
    Soon afterwards shocking reality began to sink in.  UKIP doesn’t do political work on the ground, there were no constituents’ surgeries, no campaigning, no canvassing, no contact with the electorate (they are after all, in the immortal words of one of UKIP MEPs, ‘… all stupid bunch who will always vote for us.’ ), let alone any community work offering any chance to help those who need you or to do anything.
     
    Instead Mr. Carswell be warned: you you will be faced every singe day with unpalatable bigotry, class warfare (oh UKIP hates above all those who are educated and have more than a single brain cell in their heads, especially Tory toffs, Labour socialists, LibDems intellectuals or Green enthusiasts), constant internal infighting, gossiping, blackmailing, industrial scale fraud and plain daylight robbery are the norm amongst UKIP leadership team and its close followers. You will find you are constantly hearing and be forced to follow stupidities – ranging from every available conspiracy theory (Jews rule the World, all Muslims talk to each other to hide ‘taqia’, UFOs, Establishment, MI5, FBI, KGB who is following them, Masons etc etc).  If you refuse you will be called every vulgar name you can imagine exists and be harassed daily.
     
    You can also forget about policies (those are created as Nigel’s sees any passing bandwagon to jump on that furthers his personal interest), forget about your input or even proposals. The one thing you will never hear will be how to create a better society for all.
     
    You will also have to accept the fact that Nigel ‘walks on water’, has full and ultimate control of every aspect of the party and don’t you dare steal his limelight or challenge his personal interests.
    As to walking on water just consider who would possibly consider the following to be a responsible Press Release:
    Embedded image permalink
    There really is nothing either professional or clever about trying to belittle one’s rivals!
     
    Then you will have had enough, rude awakenings after many, many sleepless nights and decide to leave.  There is only one catch. You can’t. You can leave UKIP but UKIP will never ever leave you alone.First it will start with hooligans at your door threatening your entire family, late night telephone calls with horrific threats, disgusting letters to your family and friends. 
    You will then try to go to Police but will soon find out that all those all too common BNP sympathising Police officers are now UKIP members or supporting Police Officers and you will be arrested based on pack of UKIP lies. Consider the lies and treatment of Nikki Sinclaire, ‘Junius’, Richard North, Heather Connyngham, Richard Suchorzewski, Dr. Eric Edmonds, Delroy Young, Peter Troy, Dr. David Abbott, Greg Lance-Watkins, Petrina Holdsworth, Niall Warry, John West myself and others whose reputation they have set out to try to destroy, for having the temerity to tell the truth about the leadership of UKIP.
    It doesn’t matter the fact that you have never done anything illegal, or even any civil infringement in your life, UKIP will create or attempt to create ‘your crime’ (from laughing to UKIP posters, non-existing sexual attacks, stalking their wives from your hospital bed, or ‘fraud’ which also does not exist).  Then you will spend some considerable time (yes, Mr Lord) on police bail until UKIP’s CPS lawyer conjure ‘charges’ based on no evidence, no case to answer.  Consider the fact that Nikki Sinclaire has been on bail for 29 months and even though now charged has received no details regarding her alleged offences, is this the new UKIP style of ‘British Justice’?
    You will no doubt still think, ‘this cannot happen in the UK’, we are a country based on rule of law and judicial integrity and will choose to go in front of jury, or so we believe!  The only problem will be the Judge in the case, UKIP longstanding friend who will not allow jury to hear or see any evidence but will give 78 pages long rant against you describing you as worse than a mass murderer to ensure your conviction, jail sentence, mandatory visit to forensic psychiatrist  (who will if you are lucky and get a non UKIP doctor he will write conclusion that you are sane, telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth under oath and have done nothing) and then you will be sentenced to scare you, in an effort to ruin your life, destroy your health and everything you have worked hard to achieve and to silence you so that you can never challenge the Cult status of UKIP or it deified ultimate power – Nigel Farage! 
    If you are lucky few ex UKIP members, who have seen through the lies, bullying and the smoke and mirrors that are Nigel Farage’s cult will eventually contact you to tell you how much UKIP and Nigel were boasting in advance how they set you up, how you will be jailed, how articles who will appear about your conviction are written long before your conviction by UKIP Press Officer, saturated with a pack of lies and dishonest distortions, the implication being how crazy you are, how dangerous you are and above all how you should not be contacted.
    The arrogance of UKIP’s leadership is undeniable as is their hubris with regard to their duty of representation of the electorate but the back stabbing and plotting is an omnipresent stench that poisons the soul of UKIP and any hope they might carry out their duty.
     
    And I am the lucky one.  I am still here writing this (despite massive heart failure, inability to walk properly, breathe properly and limited chances of long term survival, brought about by the abuse and the stress of defending myself from these evil people), others are in hiding, too scared to say anything, some with medically recognised depression and some in desperate situations. Even members of the inner sanctum of UKIP such as Annabelle Fuller have been hugely harmed by their association with the Farage Cult and has described herself as having mental problems, and clearly she has attention seeking behaviour patterns.
     
    Finally, you are right, you do not have to listen to a single word I have said today and feel free to do with your life whatever you want to.  I am just writing to warn you in advance or at least give you the opportunity to read this much later – Mr Carswell at least you will have been warned just what kind of mistake you made some 48 hours ago.
     
    With my very best wishes,
     
    Jasna Badzak MBA
    Former UKIP Press Secretary,
    UKIP Genereal election candidate
    and now:
    a ‘criminal’ convicted of a crime that does not exist.
    .
    Posted by myself as I largely agree with the outline and detail of Jasna Badzak’s open letter to the Tory defector Douglas Carswell.

    Regards,

    Greg_L-W..

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
     

     INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

    &
    Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
    Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
    Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
    Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
    .
    to Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

    Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

    tel: 01594 – 528 337
    Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
    Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
    DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
    Also:
    Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
    UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
    Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
    General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
    General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
    Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
    TWITTER: Greg_LW

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

    &

    To Leave-The-EU
     

    Posted in Annabelle FULLER, Douglas CARSWELL, Nigel FARAGE, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

    Police Abuse of Power Redolent of Nikki Sinclaire’s 29 Months on Bail!

    Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 19/08/2014

    Police Abuse of Power Redolent of Nikki Sinclaire’s 29 Months on Bail!
    .

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
     
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    &
     
    Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

    .

    The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
    their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

    is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

    .

    Police Abuse of Power Redolent of Nikki Sinclaire’s 29 Months on Bail showing the intimidatory arogance and hubris and the slovenly style of policing so common in Police States!

    .

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
    .
     
    Hi,
     
    it is sad to note the collapse in ethics and behaviour of Britain’s police services, once the envy of the world!
     
    The main article below is all too similar to the standards of ethics and integrity of police forces in third world police states wher over equipped police waddle around full of their own importance, with a lack of understanding that they are NOT the servants of the state but of the people!
     
    That policiong standards are in free fall in Britain are all too apparent one need only note the 30 or so police murders by armed police executing citizens when in Britain, rightly or wrongly, there is no death penalty!
     
    Ignoring the more vile cases of abuse permit me to lead examples similar to that in the article of which I am all too well aware:
     
    Consider the case of Nikki Sinclaire MEP for the West Midlands until the recent election, she was arrested on the pretext of allegations regarding supposed missuse of expenses based on what seemed all too apparently to be the lies of John Ison who having been dismissed would seem to have burgled her office and stolen confidential paperwork. Nikki Sinclaire was held on bail for 29 months in which she wasnot questioned in any detail by police yet it was acceptable for the corrupt in UKip to constantly make accusations regarding her status leading to great damage to any campaign for re-election. Was this just shoddy policing or even more seriously a case of corrupt or political policing for it is certain it proved the addage that ‘ Justice delayed is Justice denied’!
     
    Then there is my own experience where based on toltally dishonest lies from the UKip MEP Gerard Batten I was ordered to apear at Chepstow Police Force or be arrested to surrender to about 3 hours of cross examination under caution – it was clear that the local police were acting at the demand of The Metropolitan Police, which the local police confirmed.
    At the end of the interview, when it was clear there was absolutely no case to answer merely efforts to contrive a claim based on lies and misrepresentations, unsubstantiated by any evidence, from Gerard Batten.
    To this date, sojme two years, I have received no appology nor any further comment from the police on the matter – neither appologising for their gul;libility nor for their shoddy behaviour.
     
    The Police then make complaint that many consider them to be little more than a rabble of over paid, over pensioned plebs and bemoan the fact they no longer receive the support of the people they serve! Little wonder.
     
    Then there is the case of a friend of mine who moved from London, closing his successful business to relocate to the North West where he set up with his wife and child as an Independent Teacher and academic coach. Suddenly his home was raided and his teaching material and computers were seized – then came rumours and allegations that his computers were being searched for child pornography – thus ensuring the collapse of his new business.
    Some 2 years later his computers were returned to him with no further action! The police, seemingly acting in collusion with the interests of a local dignatary were only too willing to destroy an innocent man’s business and risk his marriage, his health and his family!
     
    I feel sure that at least 50% of thinking readers of this article can easily think of similar examples of which they know – not just the well publicised murders, never challenged or the abuse of public figures!

    Long-term bail allows lazy police and prosecutors to leave cases to gather dust

    Where are the checks and balances to make sure power isn’t being abused?

    There is a story, possibly apocryphal, that when Andrew Mitchell unearthed evidence that he had been “framed” by Downing Street police, he wanted to make a statement saying: “This is outrageous. How can the police do this to me? I am Cabinet minister.”

    But after he was persuaded by an astute colleague to alter it, he said: “If this can happen to a senior minister, then what chance does a youth in Brixton have?”

    I was struck by this distinction last week in relation to a different police investigation of which, indirectly, I had knowledge. It concerns a journalist, a friend of mine, who was arrested as part of the Metropolitan Police’s phone hacking investigation.

    I have been outraged at how he has been treated, and, while he is a friend, I think there is a wider issue of public concern.

    The basic facts are these: in 2012 the Times journalist Patrick Foster was accused during the Leveson Inquiry of “hacking” into an email account run by an anonymous police blogger three years before in 2009.

    He was said to have used the “hack” to identify the blogger – which resulted in the policeman being identified. Furthermore Mr Foster was accused of providing a misleading statement to the High Court when the policeman tried to take out an injunction to stop his name being published. Such allegations were bound to come to the attention of the police and rightly so. But the manner in which they conducted their investigation should be unacceptable in any society governed by the rule of law.

    After the allegations became public Mr Foster wrote a letter to the police promising to answer any questions. They confirmed it was “highly likely” that they would want to speak to him and would “make arrangements as necessary”.

    Seven months later those “arrangements” turned out to be a dawn raid at his home. He was interviewed under caution and placed on police bail and told to return several months hence to find out if he was to be charged.

    At the time, Mr Foster was working as a freelance journalist – and that work quickly dried up under the suspicion. When he returned to the police station he was bailed again for several more months. Then again. Then again.

    That went on for two years during which time he was unable to work or plan and had to wait every three months to find out if he were to face charges.

    It was not a complicated case; all the information was in the public domain or available to the police before his arrest. At no stage has he been given any explanation for the delay.

    Last week the police offered him a caution for committing a technical breach of the Computer Misuse Act. He still maintains he was innocent and believes that if he had rejected it no charges would have followed.

    So why does this matter? How does it pass the Brixton test? Well, because last year around 3,000 other people were held on police bail for one to three years. There are no time limits, no judicial oversight and no proper checks and balances on the police to make sure power is not being abused.

    It allows lazy police and prosecutors to leave cases to gather dust. It allows a form of punishment by default, even though we believe in the principle of innocent until proven guilty. And in any civilised society that has to be unjust.

    To go back to Andrew Mitchell, this is not about special pleading for journalists (or politicians). It is an issue that should concern us all and needs to be urgently addressed.

    .

    Regards,

    Greg_L-W..

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
     

     INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

    &
    Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
    Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
     
    Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
    Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
    .
    to Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
     

    Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

    tel: 01594 – 528 337
     
    Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
     
    Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
    DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
    Also:
    Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
    UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
    Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
    General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
    General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
     
    Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
    TWITTER: Greg_LW

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

    &

    To Leave-The-EU
     

    Posted in Nikki SINCLAIR, Plebs, Police, Police State, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

    Nikki Sinclaire locates a Russian Rocket Deployed In A Garden In Irkutsk

    Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 07/08/2014

    Nikki Sinclaire locates a Russian Rocket Deployed In A Garden In Irkutsk
    .

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    &
    Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

    .

    The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
    their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

    is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

    !!

    Nikki Sinclaire who is travelling from Moscow via Urkutsk to Beijing China – locates a Russian Rocket Deployed In A Garden In Irkutsk

    .

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
    .
    Former MEP Nikki Sinclaire gets a rocket on Russian holiday when she spots weapon concealed in garden
    Aug 06, 2014 12:53 By Brett Gibbons
    SINCLAIRE, Nikki - Missile  06-Aug-2014 01
    She photographs missile hidden in trees during walk around Siberian town

    Nikke SinclaireFormer MEP Nikki Sinclaire made this chilling discovery on her trip to Siberia
    Former independent West Midlands MEP Nikki Sinclaire always liked putting a rocket under her political opponents but even she was shocked to discover what was hidden in the garden of a property near to her holiday accommodation in Russia.Ms Sinclaire, who lost her European parliament seat in the May elections, is on a trip to Siberia.

    She tweeted: “Jeez! Just walking around downtown Irkutsk, Siberia minding my own business than I spot this in someones garden #cccp”

    She has been travelling across Russia on the famous Trans-Siberian railway route from Moscow to far-flung corners of the vast country.

    It seems that recent tensions in the region mean that Russian President Vladimir Putin is prepared for all eventualities.

    For those who are not followers of Ms. Sinclaire on Twitter you can view the original article CLICK HERE

    .

    Regards,

    Greg_L-W..

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
     

     INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

    &
    Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
    Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
    Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
    Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
    .
    to Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

    Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

    tel: 01594 – 528 337
    Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
    Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
    DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
    Also:
    Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
    UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
    Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
    General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
    General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
    Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
    TWITTER: Greg_LW

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

    &

    To Leave-The-EU
     

     

    Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

    This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!

    Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/07/2014

    This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!
    .

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    &
    Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

    .

    The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
    their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

    is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

    .

     This charging of Nikki Sinclaire Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice when in the context of the €Billions the EU squanders, overpays and loses to fraud particularly relative to 29 months on bail where justice delayed is clearly justice denied!

    .

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
    .
    This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!Hi,

    You may find some of the facts below; and there many downloads and screen captures which I have supporting the opinions below; of interest IF you value campaigning for British Justice, responsible & competent police and cleaning-up Ukip to make it fit for purpose!

    http://juniusonukip.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/nigel-farages-useful-idiot-john-ison.html

    http://ukip-vs-eukip.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/0323-ukip-official-implicated-in-theft.html

    http://markcroucher.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/07-mar-2011-ukip-john-ison-mark.html

    http://markcroucher.blogspot.co.uk/

    https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/category/john-ison/

    Croucher/ Ison blog : http://allaboutukip.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/ms-sinclaire-and-how-she-dare-not-sit.html

    On the, at the time, UKip controlled BDF:

    It is believed that John Ison used to post occasionally as “Paul Beech”, which is BP backwards – Bob Pacific on blog also. It was removed (changed to Dave Briggs!) I hear this was done after it was shown to a UKIP MEP in Sept 2010!

    “The Common Man” (Oh so Very common!) was MC backwards – Mark Croucher. This was verified for me by a UKIP Brussels insider (Croucher admitted it) at the time.

    Mjolnir post on the subject was removed by BDF Moderators!

    I can’t find an internet archive of Skeptyk’s BDF entry on the subject or his sordid and dishonest blog, and my source of screenshots have gone missing! It was December 2010, and posted Gregg Beeman’s salary details, but I doubt it was Ison as he was driving to the Alps about that time, so my guess is Croucher.

    The information in the downloads was seemingly obtained in a burglary of Nikki Sinclaire’s office by John Ison and I hold a copy of the eMail he sent, containing copies of the material he obtained, some dozens of scans, obtained either by burglary or at very least dishonestly, supplied to the duplicitous and dishonest Mark Croucher – who worked as Nigel Farage’s sewer rat seeking out any material that could be used by Farage and his cronies to manipulate and control people – Notably it was Nigel Farage’s son who commented to Roger Knapman that he was the only person on whom his father did not have a (black) file!

    The so called evidence against Nikki Sinclaire would seem to have been obtained by theft including burglary also recordings of phone calls recorded by John Ison and edited by Mark Croucher is also available – whether the police know that the evidence was stolen and the recordings edited I know not! However after almost 30 months on bail it is clear the police have had to drop a number of their original claims against Sinclaire & the 3 members of her staff originally bailed, as they obviously have failed to stand them up even when aided by the dishonest and self serving John Ison or anyone who worked for Farage!

    There is absolutely no doubt that any errors of claiming by Nikki Sinclaire (or more likely her staff and most probably deliberate claims inserted into her accounts by third party efforts to damage her) do NOT justify the prolonged period of bail used to smear her name on the grounds of ‘Justice delayed is justice denied’!

    The standards of behaviour by the police and others in these allegations give one every concern for the calibre of justice that can be expected and even a guilty verdict would not seem justice in the long run!

    Clearly Justice should be seen to be done and much of the behaviour of those involved in the accusations and allegations, not to mention gathering of information and the vile gutter commentaries of a personal nature against Nikki Sinclaire by many of the low lifes associated with Ukip that this shoddy police activity has caused is a matter not of dignity or competence on the part of the police or Ukip and its associates but a slur on both the body politic and the tenets of Justice in these United Kingdoms.

    It has been suggested by a retired police Acting Chief Supt. of 30 years distinguished service that:

    ‘….no interview / charges presented face-face + hand delivered summons (charges) (after this period on bail+ investigation) = possible’ “strong grounds for malicious prosecution charge”.

    Misconduct in Public Office does carry a maximum life sentence and is presented under common law, not statute.

    http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/misconduct_in_public_office/#a015

    An easy “catch all” – but it has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt!

    May I also draw your attention to:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news…etty-cash.html

    ALSO the fact that despite his many lies and efforts to deny his crimes and seek to claim they were invented by myself Derek Clark UKIP MEP was found guilty by OLAF of extensive false claims of EU expenses and was merely ordered to repay somewhere between £50K & £100,000 and seemingly no further action was taken.

    In the case of Stuart Agnew MEP UKIP no action was seemingly taken to recoup the numerous £1,000s he falsely claimed as expenses as he admitted on camera to The Sunday Times nor against David Bannerman MEP UKIP (now a Tory MEP!) similarly implicated and neither have cleared their name!

    Similarly UKIP leader & MEP Nigel Farage and a previous MEP leader of UKIP Jeffrey Titford were ordered to repay monies they had falsely claimed in expenses!

    It is also worthy of note that Nigel Farage has also been accused of dishonest accounting having failed to declare donations to UKIP of over £200,000 and there is also still the issue of what happened to what may have been as much as £1M collected through the Ashford ‘scheme’ which he described as ‘UKIP’s best ever money maker’, however the party chairman, David Bannerman spoke on a point of orderr in reasponse to Richard Suchorzewski at a public meeting in Derbyshire, conceding that less than 15% of the money raised was ever presented to UKIP!

    There was it seemed extensive money laundering in that large sums of money were processed through credit card donations which were processed through the credit card machine of Graham Booth UKIP MEP’s Hotel in Torquay!

    Similarly there were many £1,000s collected in buckets and if accounted at all only loosely, as the outcome of the Court case brought against UKip by The Electoral Commission, which UKip lost, though UKip turned the issue to advantage seeking to raise the money and costs by bucket collections at a series of public events and by seeking donations. Contrary to claims the donation made by Alan Bown was clearly a breech of the rules as Alan Bown had removed himself from the electoral register as, I understand a part of his divorce proceedings when he left his wife and was co-habiting with one of his betting shop manageresses. Thus the donation was not legal!

    A situation bearing many similarities to the donation UKip received some years previously when they accepted a sizeable donation from the owner of a UK football club who was not on the electoral register. UKip, without complaint, refunded the money that had been an unlawfull donation and arrangements were made by thwe donor to have it re-donated in a legal manner (in that case I believe it was by his wife who was on the electoral register) – Just as could have been done relative to Alan Bown’s donation.

    Despite claims by dishonest or ill informed UKip members this was not a case of ElCom picking on UKip relative to the large donation made by an individual, subsequently found to be criminal, made to the Lib.Dims. as in that case they had carried out due diligence, even going so far as to contact ElCom for a ruling on the matter before utilising the money. I understand at the time of rec eipt of the money the individual was on the electoral register and neither the Lib.Dims. nor ElCom could have had any idea he was subsequerntly to be found guilty of criminality!

    I was reliably informed, at the time of the start of this sorry debacle, that as soon as the tampering with her accounts took place and she was aware of it she immediately contacted the EU Payments Office and provided all the details she could and whether the EU Payments Office arranged repayment or merely wrote it off as being a paltry amount relative to the normal level of squandering of tax payer’s money that is endemic in the undemocratic and corrupt EU, I know not.

    On these few comments alone and the links given it becomes all too apparently clear, in my opinion, that this is little short of malicious prosecution, seemingly for political gain or pure malice, of some sort, of individuals or groups of individuals and that the lack of ethical behaviour in extending the bail period from Feb-2012 (after Nikki Sinclaire herself had made public, and I believe had reported this to the police, she had reason to believe her accounts had been maliciously tampered with by a member of staff she believed had possibly made false claims and stolen from her) until this week.

    Some 29 months on bail, with no further questioning and apparently no details of the police claims supplied, is little short of harassment and could justifiably be claimed as having ensured she was not re-elected as an MEP and is thus currently unemployed, technically, with a case pending which ensures she will be unable to get responsible employment until justice has been seen to be done and her name cleared – presumably with a healthy level of compensation!

    Particularly as it is clearly shown and provable, in her accounts, that Nikki Sinclaire injected a sum in excess of £120,000 of her own money from salary and other personal sources also used a large sum of fully audited money, raised through donations, to fund her work and responsibilities, as she believed them to be (viz: obtaining 220,000 signatures to her petition to HM Government which was the direct and sole cause of David Cameron being forced to hold a debate of the House of Commons relative to Britain’s membership of the EU and thus the undertaking of an IN/OUT referendum, which he clearly led thwe public to believe would be binding).

    It is bizarre to believe that an individual who donated a sum well in excess of £100K would then bother with some penny ante sum (by the standards of fraud in the EU by MEPs) – had she wished to gain more income a few £1.000 on mistakenly claimed travel expenses would be dwarfed by her net loss of personal monies through her donations. Even were the police able to engineer a conviction I do not believe Justice would be seen to be done and it is my opinion the entire matter is seeking to ‘get egg off the face of The police’ for having firstly believed the miscreants who would seem to have dishonestly and deliberately ‘set her up’ and for secondly having so tardily acted to bring the matter to Court even if they believe they have a case.

    Regards,

    Greg_L-W..

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
     

     INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

    &
    Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
    Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
    Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
    Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
    .
    to Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

    Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

    tel: 01594 – 528 337
    Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
    Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
    DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
    Also:
    Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
    UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
    Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
    General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
    General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
    Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
    TWITTER: Greg_LW

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

    &

    To Leave-The-EU
     

    Posted in British Justice, Derek CLARK, EU, EU Corruption, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Mark CROUCHER, Nikki SINCLAIRE, Stuart AGNEW, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

    Jasna Badzak – ‘Open letter to my former ‘friend’ Nigel Farage’

    Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 18/06/2014

    Jasna Badzak – ‘Open letter to my former ‘friend’ Nigel Farage’
    .

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    &
    Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

    .

    The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
    their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

    is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

    .

    Jasna Badzak – ‘Open letter to my former ‘friend’ Nigel Farage’ – May well cause the more gullible UKIP supporters some consternation as they realise UKIP is actually the ‘Farage’ cult & not a party!

    .

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
    .
    COPIED FROM TWITTER 22:10hrs. Wednesday 18-Jun-2014
    .

    Open letter to my former ‘friend’ Nigel Farage Read:

    Open letter to my former ‘friend’ Nigel Farage


    Open letter to my former ‘friend’ Nigel Farage
    Friendship in life and especially political life is a very strange concept. I know it is not alien to me because I, unlike you, still do have many friends, genuine friends across all parties political world.
    I was even a friend to you once. On my part, a truly genuine one. I take friendships very seriously, and once I let anyone in my world I am loyal, dedicated and extremely protective of my friends.
    From your side I know now it was never the case. However, you always did one thing for me – provide me with hours of laughter.
    Two days ago you heard me laughing my head off. Only you have the tenacity to call me after everything that was said and done to me and offer your ‘friendship’, and money for silence, as well as thinly veiled threat not to further hurt me and even to offer UKIP me ‘media expertise’, whatever that might be.
    Only you can do it three times. I was shocked that I have overestimated your intelligence thinking even Nigel is not that stupid. Maybe you did not understand it the first time when I told you that I want nothing from you, apart from my health back, which you cannot give me. That is called sarcasm and you can ask Annabelle to look it up in the dictionary for you, safe in the knowledge you really do not read the books (let alone write them). You will, even with your amount of copious drinking, remember us talking about UKIP Immigration policy on the balcony of 32 Smiths’ Square on sunny 24 February 2011 where your ‘Immigration and Islam Spokesman’ simply plagiarised parts of Mein Kampf. Your only response was ‘I never read Hitler’s book’.
    Second time I was very clear – no amount of money in the world can buy my silence. Another concept you do not understand because with you everything is about lining your own pockets.
    So you tried again. Third time. Why? To close the police investigation into UKIP and you personally? To stop me talking to Electoral Commission? To stop exposing your fraud? To save your precious skin? Or all three?
    It was not enough that you have remained silent while Batten was inventing a criminal case that never existed to silence me about very existence of his and UKIP’s ‘Charter of Muslim Understanding’, his and UKIP’s Dismantling Multiculturalism to remove Jews and Muslims from UK, your refusal to testify against Batten for his fraud simply because he knew about your fraud too, your part in conspiracy to pervert the Course of Justice and convict me for the crime which only does not exist but I could have never committed, and just to silence and discredit me for simply telling the truth.
    Well my former friend I am not for sale and there is nothing you can do to silence me, stop me, buy me and especially threaten me.

    I wonder what response this will get from Farage – will he be man enough to admit he is setting out to pervert the course of justice and bribe a witness, or so it would seem.

    Let us not forget Farage is under investigation both ‘yet again’ & ‘not before time’!

    Interestingly George Stride, Geoffrey Collier & Nikki Sinclaire (& others) were all members of ‘Farage’s’ UKIP South West Regional committee who were well aware that Julia Longhurst supplied Farage with his  Constituency Office and UKIP Regional Regional Office for, in Farage’s own words: ‘For a peppercorn rental’, as I recal all three and others were at the meeting when Farage and the Longhursts reached agreement some 15 years ago.

    It would seem that amongst other sums of money Nigel Farage has obtained is a sum of £205,000 which were ‘allowances’ for his constituency office when it was in fact funded by the generosity of the Longhursts and was in fact also UKIP’s regional office where amongst others Steve Harris worked as UKIP Regional Organiser for many years!

    this sum would seem never to have been declared as a political donation, despite the fact that it had been repeatedly pointed out to Fasrage!

    This sum should not be confused with the some £211,000 which in one year alone was declared in Farage’s accounts for his office as ‘sundry expenses’ – sundry expenses that exceeded 50% of the cash expenditure/turnover of the office for the year! Whether Farage was able to pass off this amount annually I do not know but let us not forget that, looking through the list of donations listed by The Electoral Commission, Nigel Farage would seem never to have made a significant donation to UKIP – yet he was able on one occasion alone to deposit £250,000 to his trust account in The Isle of Man!

    It has been reported by the media that if found guilty under investigation Fararage could face a prison sentence and let us face it this is a considerably larger sum than the £36,000 or so which earned Tom Wise3 a two year prison sentence!

    Little wonder it would seem that Nigel Farage will take any risk to avoid the consequences of his reported actions as reported by the media.

    I personally do not accept the desperate efforts of some to claim Farage is being smeared by the media because he is some sort of threat to the ‘establishment’ – my personal experiences over many years and the 100s of people who have contacted me or provided information show Nigel Farage to be UKIP and UKIP to be Nigel Farage, so what passes for leadership is and always has been the promotion of the Farage cult where Farage acts as a sociopath in the delusion that whatever he does or says is true and correct and that anyone with differing opinions must be forced out of HIS party.
    Sadly I believe there is every reason to believe that UKIP is corrupt from the top down and like fish it rots from the head down!

    Regards,

    Greg_L-W..

    ~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
     

     INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

    &
    Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
    Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
    Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
    Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
    .
    to Reclaim YOUR Future 
    &
    GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

    Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

    tel: 01594 – 528 337
    Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
    Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
    DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
    Also:
    Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
    UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
    Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
    General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
    General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
    Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
    TWITTER: Greg_LW

     Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
    & Publicise My Blogs 
    To Spread The Facts World Wide
    of
    OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

    &

    To Leave-The-EU
     

    Posted in Annabelle FULLER, Geoffrey Collier, Julia Longhurst, Nigel FARAGE, Nikki SINCLAIRE, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »