Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

Clearly Amateur Hour Amongst #Ukip Mouth Pieces As #Louise_Mensch Uses FACTS …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 08/08/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Clearly Amateur Hour Amongst #Ukip Mouth Pieces As #Louise_Mensch Uses FACTS …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

Ukip fighting like ferrets in a sack as usual, showing the divisions with Andy Wigmore as Arron Banks(rupt’s) puppet! Clearly Amateur Hour Amongst #Ukip Mouth Pieces As #Louise_Mensch Uses FACTS to blow them out of the water, yet again, on Twitter:

Aug 8

Andy Wigmore Retweeted helluvaday

Lol – yeah right

Andy Wigmore added,

 

 

Yes – exactly what should be done because this looks very similar to what Manafort was doing…

 

 

And as for Traitor Farage – this says it all…

 

 

“I think you are a nutcase”= perfect Trumpian response to “Why did you meet with him?” DJT&Nigel must have attended scammer-U at same time.

 

 

We had a shot of vodka = we must. E Russian spy’s – you utter cretin get a life

Andy’s feeling a little nervous? So awesome to watch them try to their way out of treason

Hardly – just can’t quite believe how many lunatics and fantasist are out there and by the looks of you you’re one to

Lol..nope. married father of 3 boys. VP of a tech company and know enough about technology to know it screwed. You and Nigel…

Then you will be familiar with a company I’m associated with enjoy 😊 and if you think that doubt yours is very good

(muffled laughter)

Laughing gas your preferred poison tonight Loo Loo?

Andy I can’t even it’s like watching panto. Don’t you understand how utterly fucked Farage is? go to the FBI. Please.

Hahah – darling you have no clue do you – bless

Mate, how about this. The night before went in to see , called him. recorded that call.

They recorded that call because has been under surveillance for a long fucking time, Andy. And they gave the recording to

Replying to and

Now have I qualified myself to you, or would you like more? I’ve got lots more. = UK Incarceration Party cc

Greg_Lance-Watkins Tweet text

Not a chance Loo – it’s too funny for words you think this

Replying to and

Man, makes you guys look like amateur hour.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

 

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

A Sad List Of Candidates For Leadership Of #Ukip …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/08/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
A Sad List Of Candidates For Leadership Of #Ukip …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

Ukip has published its sad list of leadership candidates for its election next month after the loss of their Messiah:

FARAGE, Nigel 94 ORCHESTRATING A DEFECTION 01

he was no leader but was indubitably a competent, if self serving, self indulgent and self enriching rabble rouser and undeniably he raised the rabble!

After fronting Ukip with #BreXit achieved despite the utter ineptitude and divisive nature of Farage and his bankrololer Aaron Banks who is increasingly seen to be little more than a self publicist with access to money – something of a frontman for larger influences!

You will have noticed the links that I have published and apparent influence of Russia and Russian money which is coming to light …

Those who have been listed so far as candidates are:

David Allen
Henry Bolton
David Coburn
Jane Collins
David Kurten
Marion Mason
Aidan Powlesland
John Rees-Evans
Ben Walker
Anne Marie Waters
Peter Whittle

A list all too easily perceived to be made up of nobodys, nebishes, nere do wells, chancers and clearly the irrelevant when considering their political reputations and achievements – there would seem to be no one of merit, notable competence or leadership skills but do note Ukip admits it has not performed due dilligence & vetting – howmany and who that will leave is to be announced after Ukip NEC meeting on the 11-Aug.

There may well be none left.

Even at a glance the list shows a sad potential choice with no notable choice to make!

It looks all too likely Ukip’s decline will continue & if forced to repay the funding it would seem to have perloined that decline could overnight become a collapse!

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

 

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The State of Ukip in Wales: More Muddled, More Divided & In Freefall! …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 01/08/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
The State of Ukip in Wales: More Muddled, More Divided & In Freefall! …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

State of the parties in Wales: UKIP

  • 08 August 2017

UKIP banner

“My gut feeling is that we’re going to get the Brexit that we fought for, and like your favourite old banger that you drove around and had wonderful picnics in and went to the seaside, it got you to where you wanted to go. But the day comes when you have to say goodbye to it and replace it, with a better model.”

Nathan Gill is not talking about a car, but about his own party.

As the party embarks on its third leadership contest in a year, UKIP’s MEP in Wales thinks that, unless the party can find a big issue to corral around like the Brexit negotiations, it could be curtains for its future.

Paul Nuttall, the party’s last leader, resigned after a dire general election performance which saw the party win no seats and, in Wales, saw UKIP lose all of its deposits in the 32 seats it contested.

Its share of the vote plunged too, from 13.6% in the 2015 general election to just 2%.

It didn’t always look like it was going to be this way.

Nathan Gill
Image caption Nathan Gill suggests that a UKIP without a cause to rally around may be like an “old banger”

Back in May 2016 UKIP formed a group in the assembly with seven AMs sitting in the Senedd.

The assumption held by many was that their assembly presence would serve as a springboard for the party to continue to build its presence in Wales.

So far, that has not happened.

Since the Senedd election two of their most high-profile members – Mr Gill and Mark Reckless – have gone independent, dwindling their assembly numbers to five.

UKIP also failed to take off at the Welsh council elections a month before the general election result, failing to win any seats.

David Rowlands, the UKIP AM for South Wales East and a long-standing member of the party, argues that the poor performance in June was not down to UKIP but the fact that the poll was like a “presidential” election.

“The reason that it looks so bad for ourselves is that we’ve hit such heights over the last few general elections,” he says.

But there had been internal disagreement over the party’s general election campaign, which focused on banning the burka as a key policy.

The policy aroused controversy inside and outside the party. It was criticised by Nathan Gill after the election, saying he had distanced himself from the campaign and that Muslim women should not be told by politicians what to wear. The policy prompted UKIP’s foreign affairs spokesman to resign .

The issue fed into the question around what UKIP’s purpose is now, with its core policy – Brexit – being implemented by the UK government.

Mr Gill, who remains a UKIP MEP despite being an independent AM after falling out with Senedd group leader Neil Hamilton, says the reality was that there “was the one issue that united us, and that was leaving the EU”.

“The only way really that UKIP can continue, I think, is if we have that big picture, that big goal of what we need to achieve,” he says.

The MEP claims a “half-baked” Brexit could “reignite UKIP”.

David Rowlands
Image caption David Rowlands denied there was an existential threat to the party

The new model Mr Gill refers to in his old banger analogy “may be a political movement, it may be a new party”.

It is important to remember that Mr Gill has had his own difficulties with UKIP in the last 12 months – having been threatened with expulsion by the ruling National Executive Committee over being both MEP and AM.

Meanwhile Mr Rowlands denies there is an existential threat to UKIP and says the party represents something others do not.

“What people don’t understand is, if someone should leave the UK Independence Party at the moment, which party would they go to to reflect their views?

“I’m dyed in the wool UKIP, but could I go somewhere else and feel comfortable that they care about this country in the way I care about the United Kingdom?”

He admits that some members have thought the job was done after the referendum.

“There was a feeling out there, and it was among a number of members of UKIP, that we’ve done the job that we came into being to do, we’ve got ourselves Brexit… therefore what is now the raison d’etre of the party?”

Mr Rowlands, however, says “large numbers” of members who felt that way are returning to UKIP because they fear the Brexit negotiations do not reflect what the British people voted for.

Unlike Mr Gill, Mr Rowlands said he had been comfortable with the burka ban policy.

“I think the burka is an appalling garment… to me its a symbol of oppression of women”, he says.

Anne Marie Waters
Image caption Anne Marie Waters is one of the 11 hoping to be candidates for leadership of the party

There are now 11 hopefuls who have registered an interest in taking over the party. They face a vetting process that is currently pegged to end this Friday, with voting due in September.

One of people thought to be a frontrunner is Anne Marie Waters – who has been vocal in her opposition to Islam.

There is talk of UKIP MEPs resigning if she won.

Mr Gill has been reluctant to say very much about the leadership campaign – he is not publicly backing a candidate.

The MEP is understood to be unhappy with the prospect of Ms Waters being allowed to run, although Mr Rowlands has himself said that she was unlikely to get through the vetting process .

He is backing David Kurten, a chemistry teacher and member of the London assembly.

Whoever takes the helm has the task of setting out a unifying purpose for the party that has struggled to find one since the EU referendum.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., UKIP, UKIP Wales, WALES | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

So #Arron_Banks Is Summoned To Washington To Testify Concerning Russian Funding …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 30/07/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
So #Arron_Banks Is Summoned To Washington To Testify Concerning Russian Funding …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

Leave campaign funder Arron Banks to testify on ‘Russia ties’ to Brexit and Donald Trump

Caroline Wheeler, Deputy Political Editor
July 30 2017, 12:01am,
Arron Banks, pictured with Donald Trump and Nigel Farage, says he is under threat of subpoena

The prominent “leave” campaigner and millionaire businessman Arron Banks expects to be called to Washington to give evidence before the Senate into alleged ties between the Kremlin, Brexit and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

The business tycoon has already been asked to supply information to the Senate judiciary committee investigating alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential contest.

Now he claims he has been “tipped off” by the US authorities that he will be called to give evidence to the committee under threat of subpoena, which means he could be barred from America if he fails to attend.

Earlier this year the former Ukip donor had threatened to sue Atlantic Council, a Washington-based think tank, over claims that he is a “pro-Russian actor”.

The businessman, who helped to bankroll the Brexit campaign, issued a
press release saying he was taking legal proceedings against Atlantic Council
over its report entitled The Kremlin’s Trojan Horses. It mentions Banks’s
name under the heading of “pro-Russian actors” along with figures such as
the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Ukip’s former leader Nigel Farage.

Last month Farage had to dismiss claims that he is a “person of interest”
in the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign for the presidency and
its suspected collusion with Russia.

He said the reports were “completely baloney”.

Times re Arron BANKS &amp; Russia 01

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Well may the US authorities puzzle as to whence came the leak that permitted Banks to have the story written legaled and published last Saturday when the American authorities made no formal request until Tuesday, but I guess we are all getting used to the incompetent and unreliable nature of the Trump government and its revolving door policy of employing family and friends.

Arron Banks’ chum Nigel Farage mounted a defence of Banks as he himself had not been suboenaded to be cross examined, butFarage overlooks the fact that may have given a reprieve being still an MEP and thereby having a % of diplomatic immunity.

It is of course worthy of note that Farage may well be a usable asset from the viewpoint of the FBI, CIA & NSA, it is probable they have enough facts about Farage’s activities from the plea bargaining of George Cottrell see CLICK HERE thus they can afford to reel Farage in when it suits him, in the interim they can follow up on everone who contacts him and those he contacts.

Whilst musing on just how embroiled Farage may or may not be with Russian dirty money consider:

I well recall the words of Mandy Rice-Davies in a rather more notorious Russian spy saga in politics ‘Well he would say that wouldn’t he’.

You may wish to consider more details of Arron Banks & his questionable financing CLICK HERE

Thus the saga of Ukip, BreXit and financing seems to get more convoluted by the minute. One is left to ponder whether once Banks has testified before the US authorities whether they may procede against him having rather more knowledge of his financing and accounts and the sources of his income from the transactions at his banks both in his name and numbered, in Britain and abroad!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

 

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<Also:

You will find me on both Skype & Twitter but I do not utilise the attrociously regulated FaceBook nor similar social media.

Skype: GregL-W
TWITTER: @Greg_LW

You are encouraged to contact me with information or to effect a correction on any of my postings – BUT I only respond to individuals providing a verifiable name, address and land line telephone.
NB:
  1. I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
  2. ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
  3. I DO NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
  4. I DO NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
  5. I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
  6. I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
  7. I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
  8. I DO NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
  9. I REGRET due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
  10. I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
  11. I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
  12. I AM NOT a WARMIST
  13. I DO NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
  14. I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
  15. I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR, Thorium & Psi/Si technologies
  16. I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
  17. I DO NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
  18. I VALUE the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
  19. I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
  20. I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
  21. I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
  22. I DO NOT trust or believe in armed police
  23. I DO NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence
  24. I BELIEVE in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
  25. I DO TRY to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all consequential corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Tweets

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail Address:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Blog About The Main Web Site:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

An Apparent Confession To Fraud On Behalf Of Ukip by A Founder Member of Standing …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/07/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
An Apparent Confession To Fraud On Behalf Of Ukip by A Founder Member of Standing …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

minded that Hugh Moelwyn Hughes is not only a founder member of Ukip but also a solicitor, very much in touch with both Ukip and the laws under which it has been bound for the last 24 years, I find his letter most interesting.

Moelwyn Hughes, Hugh 01

May I draw your attention to his statement:

In July 2019 we will lose our MEPs, their salaries, their allowances for staff and offices, and access to the funds of ADDE and IDDE. The few remaining paid staff will have to work Stakhanovite hours if they are to keep up with requirements, and in busy campaign periods will cause bottlenecks and delays entirely because they are required to do more than is humanly possible.

The major loss of paid staff means that we must rely on volunteers

to carry out the necessary work and to fund our General Election Campaign.

This is a quite astonishing statement from so senior a member of the party, a founder and chairman/defacto of Ukip in Wales.

This is an outright admission in written form that Ukip has been apparently stealing tax payers’ money via the EU to fund its domestic political activities, staff, offices and elections and will from ‘July 2019’ no longer be able to tap into this unlawful source of money and will no longer be able to fund itself with money obtained illicitly from taxpayers via the EU.

Hugh makes it very clear that Ukip have been dependent on

‘…MEPs, their salaries, their allowances for staff and offices, and access to the funds of ADDE and IDDE.’

This is totally contra the rules of the EU and is a fraudulent use of tax payers’ money.

Let it be noted that Jeffrey Titford, Nigel Farage, Graham Booth, Derek Clarke, Tom Wise and little doubt there have been others have been found guilty of this offence and have had to pay back substantial sums – currently Nigel Farage is under order to repay a further £80,000.

Now we have a published open letter of admission that the entire party has been dependent on monies stolen from the tax payers via the EU.

So just how many £Millions have Ukip purloined since it had its first 3 MEPs Michael Holmes, Jeffrey Titford & Nigel Farage elected almost 20 years ago and will they & successors be liable for  repayment, or like Tom Wise face a custodial sentence for their crimes.

Minded that Diane James was elected leader of Ukip and she and her partner were of some substance, might her rapid resignation have been prompted by the realisation by her partner, who was a competent & well heeled businessman, that their assets could well be attached to cover Ukip debts!

Consider the potentially catastrophic implications for senior members of Ukip past and present and for the party itself!

An open letter to all candidates for the leadership of UKIP

Posted on July 29, 2017 by Hugh Moelwyn Hughes

An open letter to all candidates for the leadership of UKIP:

SOLVING UKIP’S EXECUTIVE PROBLEM

In July 2019 we will lose our MEPs, their salaries, their allowances for staff and offices, and access to the funds of ADDE and IDDE. The few remaining paid staff will have to work Stakhanovite hours if they are to keep up with requirements, and in busy campaign periods will cause bottlenecks and delays entirely because they are required to do more than is humanly possible.

The major loss of paid staff means that we must rely on volunteers

to carry out the necessary work and to fund our General Election Campaign.

In order to attract the maximum number of volunteers to execute the policies decided by the Leader and Governing Body executive activity will have to be devolved to local manageable areas, in which members can drive to a central meeting place within one hour ie. the Counties in England, and sub-regions in Wales, Scotland and London. (Adjustments may be required in the vast sub-regions of the Highlands and Mid & West Wales)

Currently County Branches consist of Chairmen only.

In his satirical depiction of Communism George Orwell described what happened: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”, and so the pigs who were greedy for power reduced the other animals to an inferior status, and worked the faithful carthorse to death.

The Orwellian model has no place in a democratic party.

It is insulting to the members who are excluded, and by excluding talent is damaging to the Party.

The Chairman-only model is wholly inadequate to carry out the necessary executive tasks now envisaged.

Dr Alan Sked our first Leader placed this Party in the centre of the classical liberal tradition and in opposition to the top down governance of the pigs in the EU, which was destroying democracy. That was the point of the Party !

Democratic County Branches made up of all of UKIP members’ talents will be able to receive requests from the Leader and Governing Body and to action on them locally.

The County Branches will need the usual complement of Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer plus probably a membership secretary, minute secretary, press officer, fundraiser and every other functionary they can think of, to break the work down into manageable units.

County Branches will be responsible for ensuring that those Constituency Associations which are fully operational should never be interfered with, but that Constituencies which are less well developed are helped in every way.

The County Branch will provide a forum for all members in its constituencies to meet each other, to hear visiting speakers, to overcome the enemy of isolation, and to develop camaraderie, so as to be prepared for campaigning.

All UKIP members within the County will be members of the County Branch.

The constitution for a County Branch will be the same as for a Constituency Association.

Democratic County Branches will be an attractive focus for donations

We had more than 400 Patrons 2 to 3 years ago. Over 200 Patrons have left us!

Patrons need to know where their money is going, and have lost confidence in a party which does not tell them where their money went.

Patrons will give generously to a focussed campaign which is run with financial integrity.

County Branches producing proper accounts will attract donations.

UKIP is a pressure party. Our pressure forced Cameron to call a Referendum, which we won.

Now our task is to overcome backsliding Tories, impractical Corbynistas and treacherous Blairites to secure our exit from the EU and to provide voters with a free trade, free enterprise party with private sector solutions to social problems like housing, and principled opposition to the Marxist programmes which have so beguiled the younger generation.

Democratic County branches can co-ordinate local campaigns, and re-build the Party, based on the policies already identified by the Institute for Economic Affairs, the Taxpayers’ Alliance, the Freedom Association, and our very own Professor Tim Congdon and Gerard Batten MEP.

After July 2019 when the MEP model of funding collapses we will have the nightmare of managing the major requirements of the next General Election with even fewer paid staff.

The inadequacy of HQ staff at the recent General Election is going to get worse.

The Democratic County solution is essential to provide the Executive Deficit.

No other solution has been proposed !!!!!!

UKIP will fail in the next General Election if we do not adopt the Democratic County model.

Hugh Moelwyn Hughes,
A Founder Member of UKIP.

To read the original article CLICK HERE

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

#Ukip MEP #Patrick_OFlynn’s Self Serving Denunciation Of Ukip’s Efforts To Survive …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 27/07/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
#Ukip MEP #Patrick_OFlynn’s Self Serving Denunciation Of Ukip’s Efforts To Survive …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

here is the entirely self serving statement of Ukip’s MEP Patrick O’Flynn as he resigns from his position as Ukip’s ‘economic and media & sport spokesman’.

This would seem to now mean that only a minority of those elected as Ukip’s MEPs would seem to remain unsullied as Ukip members, in as far as you can call anyone who has represented Ukip as unsullied! O’Flynn would seem to have joined the majority of Ukip MEPs and quit his allocated role!

There is no one of note or apparent stature and ability left in Ukip and one may ask if they are all leaving the sinking ship to try to distance themselves from the various enquiries andf debts of Ukip and the huge sums they are being demanded to repay having falsely claimed them from the public purse, as with the recent summ of £80K being claimed of Nigel Farage!

The informed will well recall that Patrick O’Flynn is well versed in the art of self serving actions and reporting , you will recall to obtain his position as an MEP it would seem all too clear that he prostituted his entire career as a journalist – selling out as a journalist, in as far as one can attribute the title to a staff member of a rag like The Express!

Throughout the run up to his appointment as an MEP by Nigel Farage it would seem O’Flynn published promotional matyerial for Ukip, in The Express, lacking the integrity to disclose his ambition and the partisan nature of the stories he wrote for his employer.

O’Flynn is indubitably a man who can be held in little but contempt as a journalist and of dubious ethics as an MEP even by Ukip standards!

O’Flynn was it seems rewarded not only with his salary as a so called Journalist, when it is apparent he had prostituted the job of journalism to being little more than acting as an advertising copywriter fo Nigel Farage in return for appointment to the number one position in the Regional list for Ukip – despite having been an undeclared member of the party.

Clearly O’Flynn is not a man of ethics or integrity and well you may ask what is his aim in this, the latest self serving declaration:

Patrick O’Flynn MEP to relinquish posts as UKIP economic and media & sport spokesman.

27th Jul, 17

Patrick O’Flynn MEP to relinquish posts as UKIP economic and media & sport spokesman.

East of England MEP Patrick O’Flynn today announces he is giving up his roles as an official UKIP party spokesman.

Mr O’Flynn will give up his roles as economic spokesman and media & sport spokesman with immediate effect.

He said: “It is clear to me that UKIP’s activist base wishes to go in a more libertarian, shrink-the-state and Thatcherite direction when it comes to economic policy.

“Ever since becoming prominent in the party, I have argued for UKIP to be at the common sense centre of politics, rather than allowing itself to be defined as on the right wing. For example, I have sought support for tough measures to combat corporate tax avoidance and proposed a premium rate of VAT for luxury goods in order to make that tax more equitable. I have also championed more resources for the NHS, arguing against those in the party who would prefer to run healthcare on private insurance lines.

“Recently I set out in a blog why I did not think a libertarian and Thatcherite economic approach of further shrinking the state or giving more tax cuts for the rich via a “flat tax” was a good idea. But every leadership candidate I have heard appears to disagree with me about our economic approach. So rather than hanging around to obstruct a new leader, I have decided to make way now.

“I will concentrate instead on campaigning for the best possible Brexit during my remaining time as an MEP. This is one theme on which the party is entirely united around the six Brexit tests that were set out under Paul Nuttall’s leadership. So I will be glad to be campaigning entirely with the grain of the party.

“I do feel it is a regrettable that the more centrist approach argued for by the likes of me and Suzanne Evans is falling by the wayside in UKIP. But I also acknowledge that shrink-the-state libertarianism is more deeply embedded within the DNA of the party than I had appreciated.

“Libertarianism is an important strand of political thought and while I have always borne that standpoint in mind during policy formulation, I have never felt defined by it and have generally argued for the important and legitimate role of a strong state in promoting a good society to be equally kept in mind.

“I do not however dispute that Libertarians, Classical Liberals and other small state advocates deserve a political party to make their arguments to the British public and clearly there is an appetite within UKIP to set out that stall in the months ahead.

“I will always be proud of UKIP’s essential role in forcing the EU referendum and delivering victory in June of last year. And it will be an enormous privilege to help see the Brexit mission, upon which I have worked for so long, through to completion in 2019.”

To view thr original article CLICK HERE

The present leadership election was triggered after Paul Nuttall quit when the party’s support collapse in June’s general election, largely due to his inept, incompetent and corrupt leadership.

Candidates who have declared they will be standing include John Rees-Evans who last year drew criticism after he claimed a homosexual donkey raped his horse, and Mike Hookem who allegedly punched fellow MEP Steven Woolfe.

It is the second time Mr O’Flynn has stood down from his role as Ukip’s economic spokesman!

He first resigned following the 2015 general election, claiming Nigel Farage had become “snarling, thin-skinned and aggressive” because he was surrounded with a “poisonous” inner circle. This of course was fundamentally true but would also seem to have been motivated by his own personal ambitions!

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., Patrick O'Flynn, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

At Least This #Ukip Appointee Clearly Represents The #Racism Of Many In Ukip …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 21/07/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
At Least This #Ukip Appointee Clearly Represents The #Racism Of Many In Ukip …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

North Wales Ukip AM calls MP a ‘f***ing coconut’ in foul-mouthed rant

Michelle Brown said Chuka Umunna was ‘black on the outside, white on the inside’, as well as criticising other public figures

A North Wales AM has called Chuka Umunna a “f***ing coconut” during a foul-mouthed rant against him, Barack Obama and Tristram Hunt.

Michelle Brown, a regional Ukip AM, said the Labour MP for Streatham was “black on the outside, white on the inside” in a telephone conversation with Nigel Williams, who was her senior advisor at the time.

 

In the exchange on May 14, 2016, Ms Brown also described former Labour MP Mr Hunt as a “t**t” and derided his background, before saying former US President Obama was “exactly the same” as Mr Umunna.

Ms Brown has apologised to anyone offended by her comments and said the language she used about Mr Umunna was “inappropriate”.

During the conversation last year, the AM said: “I don’t say this lightly…but Chuka Umunna is a f***ing coconut.

“He’s got as much understanding of an ordinary black man’s experience as I have.

“He may be black but his mother or his father was British from a very, very influential family.

 

“He is a coconut – black on the outside, white on the inside, and Barack Obama’s exactly the same.”

A spokesperson for the National Assembly for Wales Labour group said: “This is absolutely outrageous language and lays bare the disgusting racism at the heart of UKIP.

“Anything less than immediate suspension would be a clear endorsement of Michelle Brown’s racist slur.”

Chuka Umunna MP
Chuka Umunna MP(Image: Anthony Devlin/PA Wire)

Mr Williams worked for Ms Brown for just over a year before being sacked by her in May this year, and was previously a police detective of 14 years in North Wales and Merseyside.

He said he spoke out after recently discovering the conversation among his records.

“I was absolutely appalled,” said Mr Williams.

“It’s bad enough coming from anybody, but to come from a newly appointed Assembly Member is absolutely appalling.

“I’ve seen swearing and I’ve been called all sorts of names myself, but I’ve actually never seen it from somebody in such a position.

“This wasn’t a meltdown. This was just a conversation that Michelle Brown was having, which she thought was OK.

Former Labour MP Tristram Hunt at the V&A in London on his first day as director of the museum
Former Labour MP Tristram Hunt(Image: Yui Mok/PA Wire)

“There was no meltdown going on. She was talking ordinarily about something else and just decided to throw that into the conversation.

“She was being appallingly badly behaved.”

In a statement, Ms Brown said: “The point I was making is that, because of his considerable wealth and privilege, Chukka Umunna cannot possibly understand the difficulties and issues that the average black person faces in this country any more than I can, and I stand by that assertion.

“I do however accept that the language I used in the private conversation was inappropriate and I apologise to anyone that has been offended by it.

“As far as the language I used about Mr Hunt is concerned, it was a private conversation and I was using language that friends and colleagues often do when chatting to each other.”

Mr Ummuna, Mr Hunt and UKIP have been approached for comment.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

 

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., Racism, Racism in UKIP, UKIP, UKIP Racism | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

#Nigel_Farage faces Repaying Yet Another £80,000 to #EU …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/07/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
#Nigel_Farage faces Repaying Yet Another £80,000 to #EU …
 .
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

The EU Has Demanded Another Bill… This Time £80k From Nigel Farage

20 July 2017, 20:35

Nigel Farage Defends Himself Against Unexpected 80k EU Bill https://player.ooyala.com/iframe.html?ec=IxeGgwYzE6esKyOM62MHfgVTZ7FdFfgQ&platform=html5-priority&options%5Bautoplay%5D=true&pbid=cf5340d5856f480b8ddc5ddddeec458b&options%5Bcss%5D=&options%5Bliverail-ads-manager.LR_LAYOUT_LINEAR_PAUSEONCLICKTHRU%5D=1&options%5Bliverail-ads-manager.LR_AUTOPLAY%5D=1#amp=1

Nigel Farage Defends Himself Against Unexpected 80k EU Bill

The European Union has demanded another bill… and this time it’s £80,000 of Nigel Farage’s own money.

The MEP recently received a letter stamped by the European Parliament telling him he was being unexpectedly charged the mammoth amount.

It’s all over a quibble that one of Nigel’s staff who helps represent him as an MEP also held a post in Ukip at the same time.

Nigel FarageThe LBC presenter confirmed this was the case, but argued he had done nothing wrong as the staff member worked for Ukip on a voluntary basis.

“But they’re not happy with that,” Nigel said.

“So without any meeting. Without any request to me to provide evidence. Without any formal procedure of any kind at all, the letter tells me they’re going to take £80,000 from me.”

He continued: “And it’s now my job to prove my innocence and so what we’re actually dealing with here, these unelected people are behaving frankly like people back in Stalin’s day did.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE

The comments of Ukip its spokesmen & on LBC are of course, as ever, totally dishonest or at best deliberately misleading when you consider the following:

Perhaps someone can explain why Nikki Sinclair was dishonestly prosecuted and persecuted by British Police, seeking a custodial sentence over an alleged sum of about £3,000 mis-spent based on evidence dishonestly and criminally concocted by John Ison in apparent collusion with Nigel Farage, as boasted of in Court by John Ison!

The case against Nikki Sinclaire totally collapsed and was shown to be utter rubbish based on the lies & criminality of John Ison & the attrocious incompetence & collusion in the crtiminality of Ison & seemingly Farage, of the British Police & CPS – at an estimated cost of £1.5Million!

I understand that just over a week ago ONE YEAR after Nikki Sinclaire was totally exhonerated without any compensation or damages for the Police & CPS collusion in her quite deliberate and undeniably criminal persecution, a formal complaint has been instigated!

EXTRACT OF A POSTING OF 01-Feb-2017 on this web site!:

A UKIP politician has denied smoking recreational drugs in a Cardiff hotel – but was forced to pay £250 to get it cleaned. Michelle Brown, a Welsh …

Then of course there was the press article on 01-Feb playing catch-up with the information this web site published last year!:

This is the Ukip data extracted from a MSM article published in fuller form above but worthy of repeat as you can be assured when the order is eventually made by the EU Ukip will claim it is untrue / a mistake / a misunderstanding / victimisation / a surprise / unfair or all of these – yet leading names, including Farage, in Ukip both colluded and/or directly benefitted in the money embezzeled by Ukip MEP Tom Wise who was jailed for 2 years for his fraud, theft & embezzelment of tax payers’ money.

You may well remember Tom Wise gave Nigel Farage several £1,000s of the money he had stolen AFTER it was public knowledge he had stolen the money! Farage spent the money settling an undertaking made to me that he paid Lindsey Jenkins for the right to claim sponsorship of one of her books – a payment he made to appear more of a politician of gravitas and responsibility, more than we who know him are well aware that he is as a glib incompetent deceitfull motormouth!

Also you will remember Tom Wise spent some £8,000 of the tax payers’ m,oney he had stolen trying to silence the truth by endeavouring to bankrupt me! Just as have Ukip, Gerard Batten and Mark Croucher, fortunately I have always had the very sound defence of ‘veritas’ on my side – as I have ALWAYS sought to publish the truth and have NEVER set out to dishonestly or deliberately lie or mislead on ANY comment I have made and have always stated I am willing to immediately correct any error I may make with the relevant appology be that in copyright or accuracy terms.

Whilst on the subject of Justice perhaps someone can also explain to me why Nikki Sinclaire was prosecuted at a cost to the tax payers of around £1.5M, with the intent/possibility of a custodial sentence, over £3K and Tom Wise was sent to prison for 2 years over the sum of arouind £25K he was ordered to repay of the total he perloined! Yet the police OLAF the EU the BBC, Times, Telegraph and other MSM have been well aware that having used tax payers’ money for their own benefit to the tune of some £11,000 by Ukip MEP Nigel Farage & Ukip MEPJeffrey Titford, £3>5,000 by Ukip MEP Graham Booth, numerous £1,000s by Ukip MEPJanice Atkinson, between £50>100,000 by Ukip MEP Derek Clarke and no doubt others who used tax payers’ money for gain some merely paid the money back when caught some paid a part back.

Why is there not a level playing field in matters of Justice – considering the sums involved Farage, Titford, Booth, Atkinson, Clarke and no doubt others should have been prosecuted and sent to prison – why has Justice been deliberately corrupted by the police and CPS?

When will John Ison be prosecuted for the criminality he openly boasted of in Court and even Nigel Farage who was implicated re the efforts to dishonestly and malliciously stitch up Nikki Sinclaire?

As Nikki Sinclaire pointed out on the floor in the EU so called Parliament chamber Nigel Farage funds both his wife & his sometime mistress Annabelle Fuller as staff from the public purse see the following media article:

Farage ordered to repay £80k to EU

July 21st, 2017. \\ Politics. \\ Tags: UK, #Brexit.

British eurosceptic MEP Nigel Farage has been ordered to repay £80,000 to the European Parliament, it has been reported. The institution has objected to the fact that one of his staff, paid by the EU to assist him in his work as an MEP, is also working for UKIP, the party of which Farage was formerly leader. This is against the Parliament’s rules.

Whilst not denying the facts of the matter, Farage has defended his position by claiming that the staff member in question was working for the party “on a voluntary basis.”

“Without any formal procedure of any kind at all, the letter tells me they’re going to take £80,000 from me…. And it’s now my job to prove my innocence and so what we’re actually dealing with here, these unelected people are behaving frankly like people back in Stalin’s day did.” he said.

This will not the first time that money has been reclaimed from UKIP MEPs by the European Parliament for such a breach of the rules.

The employment of party officials through the members assistance allowance is in fact a very common practice amongst MEPs of all nationalities: Marine Le Pen has also been caught out recently, and UKIP is certainly not the only British party to have done this.

There are other ways in which EU funded staff can be deployed to other purposes. During the 2004-2009 legislature, the Independence & Democracy Group, of which Farage was co-President, was found to be employing staff, and even providing office facilities, to a privately owned media company – the principle of that company being the wife of Farage’s fellow co-President at the time, Jens Peter Bonde.

In March 2014, then MEP Nikki Sinclaire caused uproar in the Parliament when she accused Farage of employing both his wife and his former mistress out of his European Parliament allowances.

Employing one’s spouse was, at the time, both widespread and legal. Now it is a banned practice. However, as is often the case in the EU institutions, when one loophole closes another opens up, and at the beginning of the current legislature Farage’s wife was found to be employed by a fellow UKIP MEP, one Raymond Finch. During the 2009-2014 legislature, Finch himself had been employed by…… Nigel Farage!

To view the original of this article in full CLICK HERE

Why haven’t Gerard Batten, the Police, CPS, the judge and various lawyers been prosecuted for what was described in Court Documents (March 2011) as ‘Criminal Conspiracy to pervert the course  of Justice (against Jasna Badzak)’.

I will provide a copy of the official summary of the Court document shortly and complete this article at that stage – but right now I’m off to deal with other commitments whilst the sun shines 😉 I may even re-read this article and correct my typos (fat finger syndrome) !!!!!!!!!

I’m back, here is the relevant .pdf:

BADZAK, Jasna REGINA vs Mar 2015 – 01
In conjunction with CPS-LETTER Sep-2015 – 01

Clearly the Courts, CPS & plaintiffs accepted that the contentions made in Jasna Badzak’s defence submission were substantially correct!

Here below is the MSM article of 01-Feb-2017 posted on this website at the time:

Nigel Farage among Ukip MEPs accused of misusing EU funds

Eight Ukip MEPs including Paul Nuttall may be forced to repay £500,000 if they are found to have breached EU funding rules

Paul Nuttall (left) is one of the other seven Ukip MEPs also being investigated by the European parliament alongside Nigel Farage (right).
Paul Nuttall (left) is one of seven other Ukip MEPs also being investigated by the European parliament alongside Nigel Farage (right). Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

Nigel Farage, Paul Nuttall and six other Ukip MEPs are under investigation by the European parliament for alleged misuse of funds, which could lead to repayment demands totalling £500,000.

Financial controllers are looking into eight of Ukip’s 20 MEPs, who are suspected of having broken rules that ban full-time EU-funded parliamentary assistants from working for the national party.

It is understood that Farage and his fellow Ukip MEP Raymond Finch will be asked to repay around £84,000 paid to their joint assistant, Christopher Adams, who is also Ukip’s national nominating officer. Adams is described as one of the party’s “key people” on its website. Parliament officials have suspended Adams’s contract because they are not convinced he was working as an MEP assistant.

Under EU rules, full-time MEP assistants are not allowed to do paid work for a national political party; part-time assistants need to have second jobs, paid and voluntary, vetted by European parliament authorities to prevent a conflict of interest.

Financial controllers are investigating the work of several other MEP assistants, where they suspect a conflict of interest between their EU-paid job and national party role. It is understood three of the assistants worked for Nuttall, who is vying to become Ukip’s second MP in Westminster in the Stoke-on-Trent Central byelection later this month.

Each of the European parliament’s 751 MEPs is entitled to €23,400 a month to pay for staff to run offices in Brussels and their home constituencies, plus a further €4,342 in office expenses. If Ukip MEPs had claimed the full allowance in 2016, the total sums involved would have been €7.3m.

Farage’s wife, Kirsten, is caught up in the investigation because she was paid as an MEP assistant while running her husband’s office for the national party.

Kirsten Farage was named as an assistant to Finch, who represents the party in the south-east of England. He has been asked to repay more than £20,000 over her employment because the European parliament’s financial controllers were not convinced she was doing real work as his assistant.

Finch employed Kirsten Farage in his constituency office to do secretarial work between 2014 and 2016. During the same period, she was full-time office manager for her husband, according to European parliament information.

Roger Helmer, a Conservative defector known for his controversial remarks on climate change and rape, faces a repayment bill of about £95,000 for employing the Ukip chairman, Paul Oakden, as his assistant. Oakden, who held the post of party director while working for Helmer, emerged into the spotlight last autumn as he sought to steady the party during the rocky period of the leadership contests to replace Farage.

One source estimated that Ukip MEPs could be asked to repay about £500,000 in EU funds if the party is shown to have broken the rules in each case currently under investigation. It is understood that the other MEPs being investigated are Jonathan Arnott, Louise Bours, James Carver and Margot Parker.

A Ukip spokesman rejected the allegations. “We have been here [as elected MEPs] since 1999 and have scrupulously applied the rules of the European parliament with very few problems. It would appear that post-Brexit there is an element of vindictiveness in the way in which the European parliament is behaving.

“We are appealing each and every one of the allegations that have been made.”

Helmer, who faces the largest bill known so far, said the parliament administration had “mistakenly” got the idea that Oakden worked for him full time. “So far as I am concerned there is no case to answer – merely an administrative misunderstanding to resolve.”

If MEPs refuse to repay misspent funds, parliament can withhold up to half their annual salaries (€79,332 a year after tax) and daily allowances (€52,104 a year), until the money has been recouped.

The European parliament’s financial controllers began the latest checks after a separate investigation revealed that a Ukip-dominated group in the institution had misspent more than €500,000 of EU money. The Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe, a Ukip-controlled pan-European party, was found to have spent EU funds on Nigel Farage’s failed attempt to win a seat in Westminster, flouting the ban on using European money for national campaigns.

Parliament is considering extending its investigation to the 2009-14 legislature, when Ukip had 13 MEPs. The current inquiry covers the current parliament, elected in June 2014.

Ukip is not the only party accused of misspending EU money to fund its national activities. The leader of France’s far-right Front National, Marine Le Pen, was last year ordered to repay €339,000, after the EU’s anti-fraud office, Olaf, found she had misused EU funds following a European parliament inquiry. The French presidential hopeful had received EU funds to pay the salaries of two assistants, but the anti-fraud watchdog said the pair worked almost entirely for the national party.

The FN leader missed a deadline at midnight on Tuesday to repay the money and now faces losing half her salary and allowance. Le Pen has denied allegations of fraud and says she will not “submit to persecution” by repaying the money.

The European parliament has played a vital role in Ukip’s political success, giving the Eurosceptic party a platform and funding it has never matched on the domestic stage.

A spokesperson for the European parliament declined to comment on the ongoing investigation. Olaf referred questions back to the European parliament.

Nicholas Aiossa, a campaigner at Transparency International, said the Ukip case may need to be referred to the EU anti-fraud office. “Recovery of these funds is essential, but the parliament needs to take a harder look at whether MEPs have been intentionally engaging in fraudulent activities and if so they should refer these cases to Olaf.”

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

 

My original article of 01-Feb-2017 can be seen CLICK HERE

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

 

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., Nigel FARAGE, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

TITHEING (OR, ABSENCE OF) BY UKIP LONDON ASSEMBLY MEMBERS …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 19/07/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 .
TITHEING (OR, ABSENCE OF) BY UKIP LONDON ASSEMBLY MEMBERS ….
 .
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

as ever Ukip members at all levels are fighting like ferrets in a sack – their leaderless situation after years of self serving leaders is just another one of the more obvious fractures that are destroying the party with no sign of anyone of any competence and political skill likely to step forward and put a stop to the squabbling.

Added to this so many senior party members are under investigation by OLAF and asd far afield as the FBI, CIA, and US NSA with quite obvious links to Russia and Russian funding it is hardly surprising!

There is even talk that Banks, Stroloff, Farage, Batten and possibly others are in danger of indictment!

Here is concrete evidence for you of how widespread this utter incompetence is and although I don’t find Ukip has sufficient worth or future to invest more time in the matter investigating this document sent to me has the absolute ring of truth to it as justy more of the same:

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL PRIVILEGED – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE FURTHER

GUIDANCE SOUGHT FROM: UKIP NEC including UKIP GENERAL SECRETARY, UKIP PARTY SECRETARY (LEGAL TEAM)

DRAFT REPORT ON LONDON TITHEING (OR, ABSENCE OF) BY UKIP LONDON ASSEMBLY MEMBERS

BACKGROUND

This report is produced because I, the Regional Chairman, am fed up of being criticised by people connected to one or other London Assembly members for my playing some role in, or being responsible for, their not attending, since May 2016, Regional committee meetings, to which I’ve always invited them. This also relates to the issue of tithing by London Assembly members.

They have not made any financial contribution to the Region or, I am advised, any significant contribution to central Party funds; if there were any significant financial contributions directly to branches, I’ve not been able to find any. This report principally relates to suggestions that, prior to being elected, AMs had promised to contribute.

At the minuted Regional meeting of May 9, 2016, several days after the AMs had been elected, NEC delegate Elizabeth Jones asked an extra-agenda question about whether the AMs would tithe or otherwise contribute money. I ended this discussion once an impasse was reached. Many of us then overheard a side conversation from the floor, where two members of the Croydon branch were agreeing that a prior commitment to tithe had been made by one or both AMs.

Several minutes later, Elizabeth revisited this, and several others chimed in. An AM took offence an began to remonstrat with her in raised tones; both left in a huff. I gently scolded the NEC member for what could be seen as incivility. At a talk after the end of the meeting, it appeared to me that a third party, the then Chairman of the Croydon branch, also thought this had happened, but was more concerned that the NEC member had been too brusque.

I had no prior intention of looking further into what was a year-old matter when the (new to the job, and apparently interpreting his role very differently from how the Regional Secretary and I saw it) Regional Vice Chairman began claiming in writing that it was largely my fault. Had he not done so, I would not have initiated these enquiries.

To quote from several of his picturesque emails addressed to myself:

“The division is disastrous and a gaping self-inflicted wound on UKIP in London … The matter is more complex than that and certainly is not solely the result of ‘unsympathetic handling from an attendee’ as your email implies. … Regarding the disastrous divisions at senior level within UKIP in London, I think it would be helpful if you acknowledged, first to yourself and then to Peter and David, your own major contribution to this unfortunate state of affairs. A little humility an realistic acknowledgement of your mistakes might open the door to reconciliation between you.

He kept calling for meetings to discuss this, though there was a snap General Election to fight. I thought this bizarre. For the avoidance of doubt – my duties include competently chairing meetings; my skill-set does not include reading people’s minds as to what they are about to do or say, but have not yet done or said. And, given the additional information, it appears as if the NEC attendee, Elizabeth, may have been justified in bringing up the matter again.

Then, the person who set all this off, the Regional Vice Chairman, resigned, citing a potential conflict of interest as he is closely involved in getting one of the AMs concerned elected as Party Leader. His resignation was accepted.

In conjunction with the Regional Secretary, I have investigated the matter; I do not find I made anything to support the Vice Chairman’s allegations against me. There is nothing further I can do – I defer to youi to look into it, and also into whether there was any prior commitment to tithe. There is some evidence there was.

The then Vice Chairman’s emails also showed knowledge of an apparently unconstitutional body operating in London in parallel with the legitimate one (the “LRC”), and fund-raising within UKIP – one which the Secretary, R.O. and I are obliged to fully investigate. The Vice Chairman claimed to have been offered a senior position in that body (“LCC”).

WHAT I HAVE SINCE DONE TO ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH

In summer 2017, have attempted to contact all attendees at the unminuted UKIP branch meeting in Croydon on October 28, 2015 (i.e., 3+ months before I was elected Regional Chairman). The position of the AM attendees is selfevident – they deny there was any commitment to tithe.

Three attendees claim a pledge or pledges were made. Written evidence from them is below.

None of the other non-AM attendees (CW, DH, MS, PK), when telephoned by me, were able to shed any further light on this. All said they couldn’t confirm tithing pledges were made, but couldn’t confirm they weren’t. One of the four (PK) is hard of hearing; the other three say they remember almost nothing of what was said. The former branch Chairman (CW), whom I thought on May 9 2016 recalled the 2015 event, in 2017 said he no longer could be sure.

So, of the seven identified attendees beside the AMs, three assert that a pledge or pledges were made, and the other four don’t recall either way. Knowing the attendees and the relations (strained in several cases) between them, I find it hard to believe there is collusion. However, I cannot guarantee there hasn’t been any. Arguably, one of the three witnesses may have an axe to grind.

Important Caveat: I cannot attest to the veracity or accuracy of anything other than what was directly witnessed by me.

None of what allegedly happened in Croydon was witnessed by me. The emails quoted below were really from their apparent senders (Kathleen Garner 02086 816135; Peter Staveley 07973168742; Suzanne Evans 07973149104).

Freddy Vachha, UKIP Regional Chairman – London

[Page 1 of 4]

EVIDENCE FROM WITNESSES

=================================================================================================

From: K Garner <kgarnerukip@hotmail.co.uk>

To: “Freddy (UKIP)” <myword_is_mybond@hotmail.com>

Subject: Fw: Croydon Meeting- extension 2 date

Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 19:17:39 +0000

Message-ID: <HE1PR07MB10048C128C37E66E792C8DC4F3EF0@HE1PR07MB1004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>

Return-Path: kgarnerukip@hotmail.co.uk

From: K Garner <kgarnerukip@hotmail.co.uk>

Sent: 08 May 2017 21:00

To: Andy Beadle

Subject: Re: Croydon Meeting- extension 2 date

Subject: Croydon Meeting

Up-date:

Not long after the selection process for the GLA elections in 2016 had finished, the three top candidates, Peter Whittle, David Kurten and Suzanne Evans, were invited to speak to the Croydon UKIP branch. The meeting was held on Wednesday, the 28th October, 2015, at The Orchard public house in Cherry Orchard Road, Addiscombe, East Croydon.

The issue of the candidates’ paying a tithe to the party arose. David Kurten stated that he would pay 10% to the party in London. I queried this, pointing out that it would involve his paying £5,000. He agreed to the amount, adding that it would in fact probably be more than that.

I recall that Peter Whittle did not make any comment about his planned contribution.

I am not sure what Suzanne Evans said but in a later e-mail in response to one from me she said that as a councillor she had paid a regular monthly tithe and would have done the same again.

At the May 9th [2016] LRC meeting held at the Old Butler’s Head, Elizabeth Jones reminded the committee that Labour members pay a tithe to their party and, with further reference to the lost mayoral deposit, pursued this issue with reference to Peter Whittle and David Kurten. Both GLA members, who were present, made it clear that they disliked the raising of this matter and refused to discuss it.

I mentioned what had been said at the Croydon meeting to Peter Staveley who was sitting to the right of my neighbour.

He agreed that these comments had been made.

Elizabeth Jones then brought up the issue again but the chairman informed her that the matter had been dealt with.

Peter Whittle left the room abruptly. David Kurten followed Peter Whittle a few minutes later.

Regards,

Kathleen Garner

Croydon UKIP

=================================================================================================

From: K Garner <kgarnerukip@hotmail.co.uk>

To: My Word Is My Bond <myword_is_mybond@hotmail.com>, Peter Staveley <Peter@PeterStaveley.co.uk>

Subject: Re: London 9/5/2015; Croydon 28/10/2015; LRC 9/5/2016.

Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 14:42:57 +0000

Message-ID: <HE1PR07MB1004EAD90A34471BD67B154FF3ED0@HE1PR07MB1004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>

I do recall that it was 10% because after David made this offer I immediately pointed out to him that this would constitute £5,000 and he not only agreed, he said it would in fact be slightly more.

This is what makes me so certain that he did make this offer in this way.

I had not thought about it since that event until the fatal LRC meeting when I was taken aback by David’s response.

Regards,

Kathleen

=================================================================================================

[Page 2 of 4]

=================================================================================================

From: Peter Staveley <Peter@PeterStaveley.co.uk>

Sent: 11 May 2017 06:54

To: My Word Is My Bond

Subject: RE: Attn: Peter Staveley.

Message-ID: <7E79D6B64DC9AD4CA85C929998631C44011237549DC9@SERVER2008.PeterStaveley.co.uk>

In-Reply-To: <HE1PR08MB0714F52055F7CDEC7BA8DFCADCEC0@HE1PR08MB0714.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

Freddy

I too have a recollection that David offered a tithe. I am not so certain that any figure was mentioned. Unfortunately, as in any witness statement, my memory has been clouded by later comments so I am less comfortable that 10% was mentioned. However, that could well have been because 10% seemed very reasonable and absolutely normal.

Certainly had I been in David’s position I would have made the same commitment (and stuck to it).

Peter

From: myword_is_mybond@hotmail.com

Sent: 11 May 2017

To: Peter Staveley <Peter@PeterStaveley.co.uk>

Subject: Attn: Peter Staveley.

Now things have quietened down as GE2017 nominations go in, or don’t, I’m briefly addressing several deeply unpleasant accusations made against me, in writing, after I won re-election at the LRC AGM (…) The essence of them is that I bear some responsibility, or even guilt, for allowing the question of tithes to be raised by Elizabeth Jones at the LRC last May 9, or by not shutting it/her down quickly enough when she re-raised them.

The bare facts of what happened were minuted and are not in dispute.

While what Elizabeth had stated a year ago evidently made several uncomfortable, and may even been in poor taste,

she was IMO neither rude nor offensive. Breaking into a comfort zone is less significant than breaking an electoral promise. Elizabeth, as an NEC member, had the right to attend LRC meetings, and, as I confirmed with both the then General Secretary (and UKIP Legal chief) and later with his successor, such attendance carries with it the right to address the meeting, though not to disrupt it.

At that May 9, 2016 LRC meeting, an exchange between Kathleen Garner and yourself, wholly unanticipated by me, was overheard by me. I didn’t miss a word of it. I have precious few talents; the ability to accurately follow simultaneous conversations, and a good sense of hearing, are two of them.

I had noticed you nodding in agreement at what Kathleen told you she had recollected (which was an abbreviated version of what appears in bold below). You recalled it too.

Understanding in a trice the significance of what had just passed between Kathleen and you, I instantly looked across at the Croydon branch Chairman. His expression conveyed to me that he too had heard the exchange.

Evidently, the exchange was also heard by Elizabeth Jones, who then immediately revisited what I’d closed down 10 minutes or so earlier. Very shortly thereafter, chaos ensued.

At the end of that fateful LRC meeting I – very briefly – spoke with the Croydon branch Chairman. His focus was his unhappiness at the manner in which Elizabeth had approached the matter, and not whether what Kathleen had recalled had really happened… I thought that significant and [perhaps] corroborative.

Last week, our having suffered this year-old incident being dredged up, one of my LRC colleagues asked for the subject of that exchange to be set out by Kathleen in writing.

This is what she has kindly provided, based on her contemporaneous notes from 2015:

“Not long after the selection process for the GLA elections in 2016 had finished, the three top candidates, Peter Whittle, David Kurten and Suzanne Evans, were invited to speak to the Croydon UKIP branch. The meeting was held on Wednesday, the 28th October, 2015, at The Orchard public house, [112] Cherry Orchard Road, Addiscombe, East Croydon [CR0 6BA].

The issue of the candidates’ paying a tithe to the party arose. David Kurten stated that he would pay 10% to the party in London. I queried this, pointing out that it would involve his paying £5,000. He agreed to the amount, adding that it would in fact probably be more than that.

I recall that Peter Whittle did not make any comment about his planned contribution.”

Kathleen also stated this came up again in email with Suzanne Evans, who commented on her own record of contributing moneys.

Peter, does the italicised material broadly agree with your recollection of those events in Croydon in October 2015? If no, where do you disagree with Kathleen? Please add anything of relevance. I was, of course, not there. (…) Thanks.

Best, Freddy

=================================================================================================

[Page 3 of 4]

=================================================================================================

From: Suzanne Evans <suzanne@suzanne-evans.co.uk>

Message-ID: <44DD3B4F-18C9-4057-AF0C-13EC67F51B6C@suzanne-evans.co.uk>

Subject: Re: Suzanne. Tithes, tears, tantrums and truth?

Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 20:05:23 +0100

To: My Word Is My Bond <myword_is_mybond@hotmail.com>

In-Reply-To: <HE1PR08MB07142CD0EE0C2AF7C267CEEEDCE30@HE1PR08MB0714.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

Dear Freddy,

I was at the Croydon meeting, as I was then still number three on the London list. I recall quite clearly that we all – myself, Peter Whittle and David Kurten – pledged to pay a tithe. I pointed out that I had done so as a Councillor. I cannot explicitly recall DK saying he would pay 10% but yes, we all did offer to pay something from our AM salaries if elected.

Best wishes,

Suzanne Evans

UKIP Deputy Chair (Policy)

UKIP Health Spokesperson

@suzanneevans1

http://www.facebook.com/SuzanneEvansUKIP

On 13 May 2017, at 17:24, My Word Is My Bond <myword_is_mybond@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dear Suzanne,

Please read what is below, as well as the attached Agenda (see 3.a-f, especially “f”) and Minutes (see the “Non-Agenda item” that appears below “5d”) for the LRC meeting held on May 9, 2016. (..) What would be helpful is for you to clarify what did, or did not, happen at a meeting of the Croydon UKIP branch you attended on Wednesday, 28th October, 2015, at The Orchard public house, 112 Cherry Orchard Road, Addiscombe, East Croydon CR0 6BA, in the matter of tithing. I was not there. (…) Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this.

Best, Freddy

=================================================================================================

From: K Garner <kgarnerukip@hotmail.co.uk>

Message-ID: <AMSPR07MB194258F7BA6B4FEBDD8DA52F3A60@AMSPR07MB194.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>

Subject: Hustings [on Tuesday 18 July 2017]

Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:42:58 +0000

To: “Freddy (UKIP)” <myword_is_mybond@hotmail.com>

CMM-sender-ip: 40.92.67.93

Very useful event, thanks.

I bumped into David Kurten as he was leaving. I reminded him of his promise to pay a tenth when he was in Croydon.

He denied it. I said he did and he appeared to claim that I was lying. By their deeds shall ye know them.

Kathleen

=================================================================================================

[Page 4 of 4]

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

 

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

#Ukip Leadership Candidate Faces Bankruptcy For Libel & Slander …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 19/07/2017

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
#Ukip Leadership Candidate Faces Bankruptcy For Libel & Slander …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:

Greg Lance – Watkins

Greg_L-W

eMail:

Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:

https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:

http://www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

MEP Jane Collins wants to be UKIP’s next leader despite facing possible bankruptcy

East Yorkshire politician who could be next UKIP leader still faces possible bankruptcy

COLLINS, Jane 03
UKIP MEP Jane Collins

UKIP MEP Jane Collins has thrown her hat into the ring to be the party’s next leader.

Ms Collins represents Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire for UKIP in the European Parliament.

She is currently facing possible bankruptcy after failing to pay damages to three Labour MPs over remarks she made about the Rotherham child abuse scandal.

But that has not stopped her from announcing her ambition to become UKIP’s next leader.

The role is currently vacant following the resignation of Paul Nuttall after the party’s disastrous performance in the general election.

Ms Collins, who lives in East Yorkshire, said she wanted to re-build UKIP’s reputation.

“Having watched what has happened to my party over the last few months I have decided to stand for leadership,” she said.

“The infighting and carpet-bagging going on within UKIP is quite frankly very disappointing.

“I have seen UKIP in this position before in the 90s when I worked with Godfrey Bloom and through Godfrey’s hard work and dedication throughout the region we built Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire into one of UKIP’s most strongest region’s with some great election results.

Hull-based UKIP MEP Mike Hookem with party colleague and fellow Yorkshire MEP Jane Collins
Hull-based UKIP MEP Mike Hookem with party colleague and fellow Yorkshire MEP Jane Collins

“At present we are still not out of the water with Brexit and UKIP must survive, thrive and succeed in delivering what the British public voted for delivering.

“Brexit is the start of the process and the next stage of the game for UKIP.”

Ms Collins, who was elected as an MEP in 2014, has been embroiled in controversy over comments she made in a speech at a UKIP conference a month after a report found that around 1,400 children in Rotherham had been abused between 1997 and 2013.

In the speech, she claimed Rotherham MPs Sir Kevin Baron, John Healey and Sarah Champion knew about child exploitation in the town but did not intervene.

Ms Collins argued it was a political speech which reflected her opinion that the MPs were likely to have known the issue was a serious problem.

But the MPs sued for libel and slander and in February she was told to pay £358,000 in damages and costs. She appeared in county court in Hull in May after failing to pay within the required timescale.

After the hearing was adjourned for an examination of her financial assets, a spokesman for Ms Collins said she would face bankruptcy proceedings if it was found she could not make the payments owed.

In a statement announcing her intention to stand for the UKIP leadership, she said: “Over the last few years, since becoming an MEP, I have been subjected to legal action by three Rotherham MPs which unfortunately put severe constraints on my party activities.

“My personal life has been badly affected and the party and my constituents who I have felt I had to speak up for have been let down by all statutory bodies in Rotherham.

“The case is still in the process with the European Court of Justice and police investigations are on-going.”

Ms Collins has also continued to question the case brought against her by the three MPs on her Twitter account.

Last month she tweeted: “I’m being sued for £250k for speaking up against Child Exploitation by predominantly Muslim gangs but somehow I am some aplogist. Weird.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

 

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., Jane COLLINS, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: