May 2023
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31

Archive for the ‘TITFORD’ Category

#0086* – INTERIM LEADER TITFORD NO SURPRISE save IN ITS CRASSNESS!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 02/09/2010

#0086* – INTERIM LEADER TITFORD NO SURPRISE save IN ITS CRASSNESS! Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable! The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

INTERIM LEADER Jeffrey TITFORD IS NO SURPRISE
save IN ITS UTTERLY PREDICTABLE CRASSNESS! !

TITFORD, Jeffrey

This is but a summary! For a huge amount more CLICK HERE

Jeffrey TITFORD a Past UKIP MEP, & Past Leader

Long past!

This elderly chap requires no more public canteen medals for his belittlement and exploitation.

The publicity handout picture above would seem to be most kind but I gather he still has a predilection for ties with spots on and even at times lapels similarly adorned but allowance must be made for his age as he approaches 78 in a months time – we appreciate he made it clear he had dreaded retirement and sitting at home with his wife.

It is clearly understood that after his corruption of the selection process to try to rig a position on the MEP list to replace him. Titford’s placeman the oleagenous and untrustworthy circus performer Stuart Gulleford who has so constantly tried to ride two horses at the same time betraying both masters.

Many will remember the witnessed claims of Gulleford and Titford colluding in flagrant abuse of the data protection act to download and read the eMails of trusted and elected Officers of UKIP for their personal gain in much the same dishonest way that Mark Croucher has used the data base as a member of staff to try to defame and lie about people.

You will be aware that it was from Jeffrey Titford’s office that Tony Bennett did such harm to the party reputation and setting out to sabotage the party with the creation of Veritas. Then next to be elevated from Titford’s office was the criminal Tom Wise who is widely believed to have rigged the election process with the aid of Jeffrey to become an MEP displacing Robin Page under most dubious circumstances.

The appointment of Titford as a bidable and malleable interim leader is hardly surprising he has held the role of puppet leader many times in the past as many will recall. Though clearly a crass appointment now, even if he will do what he is told.

Do not forget that if Jeffrey Titford has a shred of integrity his first job will be to set aside the clearly corrupt NEC election results as invalid – It is my contention that poor old geriatric may well remind many of the first stanza of Coleridge’s famous poem ‘Eskimo Nell’ and prove too gonadically challenged to carry out his duty.

Jeffrey’s first stab at the job was after I had circulated a letter from Bill jamieson and Christopher Booker with a covering letter to state that if Rodney Atkinson became leader of UKIP they and thus their paper, would withdraw any support from UKIP as he was not considered a plausible leader for the party.

This letter was mailed to every member on one of several data bases I was supplied with anonymously.

Shortly after a delivery van arrived at my door and delivered some 7 or 8,000 letters, address labels and envelopes – the letter was a direct copy of an eMail I had sent out with my opinion on the candidates.

It was my contention in this correspondence that after the tempestuous period of Michael Holmes’ leadership he was clearly unfit to lead and had withdrawn himself promising not to contest the leadership. I promoted Jeffrey as a calm if uninspiring pair of hands for the party to regroup behind. Jeffrey was elected by the barest of margins which I believe was the grounding of the specious story put about thet I was a spy working for MI6 – clearly a lie but conjoined with a comment from Norman Tebbit that of course the intelligence services had agents in every party. Some of the idiots in UKIP not being the brightest put two and two together and came up with their customary 5! Some are so stupid they repeat this story to this day!

The most likely winner at that election would have been catastrophic for UKIP based on track record and judgement etc.

With hind sight one must wonder if Titford was much better, though better he would seem to have been despite his duplicity, his weakness and his toadying to Farage.

And of course his dishonesty which could not have been predicted unlike Tom Wise‘s!

Much as Farage may find Titford suitable to manage his feifdom until he retakes the mantle or anoints his next puppet leader – beyond any doubt the manner in which this has been conducted with a corrupt and corrupted NEC selection and a meeting of this invalid and risible claque to appoint the ‘chosen one’.

TEXT

INDEPENDENT Leave-
the-EU Alliance

Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate)

LEAVE-THE-EU
to Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in Bill JAMIESON, Christopher BOOKER, Gulleford, Jeffrey TITFORD, TITFORD, Tom WISE | Leave a Comment »

#123* – EUkip Before The Courts AGAIN!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 12/11/2008

#123* – EUkip Before The Courts AGAIN!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S LETTING DOWN ITS TROOPS!

Hi,

You will have read the build up to this shot across EUkip’s bows in the copy eMails I have published from my leadership contacts.

John West first of all queried the dishonesty and incompetence of the selection and election, he wrote with queries and complaints, expecting an honest due process since it was administered by Christopher Gill whose reputation led Mr. West to believe he could trust Gill – how wrong he was! I understand his Private & Confidential letters were widely circulated by Gill himself – I know the copies I was sent certainly were!!

Gill’s behaviour was beneath contempt as was almost every aspect of the corrupt process.

Those in doubt need go no further than to read EUkip’s own appointed Returning Officer’s report, which I have widely circulated and will be on this blog when I get time to post it as I’m trying to post in cronological order working back AND keep up to date (sorry I’m falling behind a bit, well a lot actually!)

Mr. West has made it abundantly clear that he did not expect to get selected merely experience and a fair chance in line with what was promised in the contract that EUkip entered into and acknowledged when they accepted his money.

You will have noted that not content with a criminal breech of the Data Protection Act, which the leader condoned – even it seems forcing his Chairman to sign a dishonest pack of lies in a letter which led to John Wittacker’s fortuitous resignation. I say fortuitous because it gave Farage the opportunity to parachute in his own unelected puppet bought and paid for. Nuttall quite clearly lacks competence, integrity or morality and so clearly lacks the respect of all of his NEC that he had to call the Police to restore order when he found himself chairing his first NEC!

Mr. West has asked in many ways and often for a simple apology and now it seems he is ratchetting up the pressure, as it is clear that he has no intention to knuckle under to the bullying, lies and distortions being levelled at him and his wife, by EUkip.

Nor even to the illegal kangaroo courts and contrived ambushes – EUkip is digging its way deeper and deeper, in its dishonesty and disgracefull behaviour, it is fast reaching an irredeemable situation esspecially now their corrupt ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment has been ‘spoofed’ and the manipulation of their own Constitution rumbled – it makes a ‘Kristall Nacht’ more difficult to orchestrate and large as they may look in their shaving mirror they are far short of a Wanasee Conference & Final Solution.

They may be that odious but they just ain’t that clever!

Hence this rather weak article in the local papers but when you think that Neil Puffet was unaware of the fraud, lies, embezelling and money laundering of Tom Wise as reported in the MSM or the fact that Tom Wise had been arrested and had just had his bail extended by some 3 months, for further investigations! This chappie seems a little out of touch as his sister paper in the same building has published the story – he failed to see the humour when I asked if he read the local papers!!

To be fair his sister paper did publish the drivel about Titford & Gulleford being cleared and the rumour has it that Mr. West made mallicious and unfounded allegations against Gollom & his handler – That Mr. West is likely to be prosecuted for wasting police time is utterly untrue, in fact I have spoken to the police and I can assure you that is a lie. However, one which I note the unwise in EUkip’s team have committed libelously to paper.

Perhaps the next round!

The Evening Star – Ipswich

UKIP taken to court by candidate

12 November 2008 16:17

by: Neil Puffet

AN Ipswich general election candidate is taking his own party to court following a row over the selection process for becoming a Euro MP.John West, who will stand for election for UKIP in the North Ipswich and Central Suffolk constituency in the next general election, is demanding a £500 deposit back after failing to get the nod to represent the party at the next European elections due to be held next June.

Mr West declined to reveal details of the dispute but told The Evening Star he has lodged the matter with Ipswich County Court.UKIP have around three weeks to respond and if the matter is not settled the issue could go before a judge.Mr West, who is also UKIP chairman for Ipswich and east Suffolk, said:
“I can confirm I’m taking legal action against UKIP over the MEP selection process.”A spokesman for UKIP said: “Mr West underwent the same process as the rest of the candidates.“Unfortunately on this occasion he was not successful.

“We gather he is looking for the return of his deposit and the party will look into this at a senior level as soon as it can.”

Ipswich County Court was unable to confirm if a claim has been made.The East of England constituency has a total of seven MEPs representing the area in Brussels – in 2004 two UKIP candidates were elected from the region.

It is clear that EUkip haven’t a leg to stand on as their own report from their own returning officer unequivocally admits their guilt – compounding this interim payments in liue of potential damages have been made as ‘doucers’ to Robin Page, Lyndda Robson and no doubt others wherein EUkip are in breech of contract, as outlined in the Returning Officer’s report. I gather payments so far are in the region of £250, presumably as they try to negotiate damages for breech of contract.

Astonishingly EUkip are still dishonest enough to ask people to vote for them despite the undeniable fact that they can’t run their own party!

This is a party which in 15 years has failed to run ANY training – how might they fare with the education brief?

This is a party with scant regard for Constitution – how might they be if called upon to uphold our Nation’s destiny?

This is a party that has let their administration & justice internall tumbrel out of control – how might they behave with the Home Secretary’s department?

This is a party where a senior spokesman said:

“We gather he is looking for the return of his deposit and the party will look into this at a senior level as soon as it can.”

Yest you will have seen elsewhere on my blog copies of the correspondence in which NuttAll – Farage’s bought & paid for puppet – stated that he had taken legal advice (he’s doomed if that is Oxley or Zucherman as it is increasingly clear the closest they have come to Silk is oggling it in a club!) NuttAll unwisely and briefly refused to either apologise or make good the payment.

It will be interesting to see, in Court, the provenance that every participant in the selection in discussion had personally paid, had provided a CRB, had provided their electoral role number and was a resident at the time.

Is EUkip alter its technique and stop digging but now try to fill the ends in – because it looks suspiciously as if their situation is terminal! In that it is quite clearly of their own making one is forced to wonder whether it is deliberate – as a false flag operation or merely on the childish basis of ‘I’m having a party & you’re not coming!’

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in Gollom, Gulleford, Kristall Nacht, Piers MERCHANT, Rachel Oxley, Reichstag Fire, TITFORD, Tom WISE, UKIP, Zucherman | Leave a Comment »

#114* – Gollom’s lost his Pressssiousssss!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 10/11/2008

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

BEFORE WE START TODAY:
I wonder if those of you on the NEC and amongst the leadership, or at least with access to EUkip computers and mailing lists would perform your usual stunt and leak like Billy Oh to your apparatchiks – those who regularly mail me ‘stuff’ don’t worry as, if you circulate the URL that follows, people will believe that you are on side and not one of my sources – so play safe 😉

Here is the URL to mail out, to bring people up to speed with what is going on – as time passes not only will it be kept upto date but also the backlog will be posted – almost 200 blogs so do forgive me if it takes a little time.

http://caterpillarsandbutterflies.blogspot.com/
ADD IT TO FAVOURITES
LINK FROM YOUR BLOG

#114* – Gollom’s lost his Pressssiousssss!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S CORRUPTION & THEIR COLLAPSE!

Hi,

Sorry todays news update is a little unimaginative but it does rather reflect those who were posting the material to each other in outright betrayal of the membership and clearly out of venal self interest.

Little Gollom excels himself as he slithers around duplicitous as ever – an unpleasant and cowardly creep always ready to do something in his own interest.

He has proved in the past to have the honour and integrity of a snake and the personality of a stoat. Both untrustworthy and vicious in his self interest – willing to mislead and back stab along with the rest of that which has floated to the top of the septic tank of EUkip politics.

I do particularly enjoy the grovelling of Youles, ever available to promote himself by a little underhand brown nosing!

By the way – thanks to my source who, as I understand, it mailed it to me through a blind hotmail account having received it, I presume on a lap top in the EU, earlier last night.

Anyway – make of this what you will and I will interject but a little 😉

—– Original Message —–
From: “John Youles” <jbyoules@ntlworld.com>

To: “Paul Nuttall, UKIP Chaiman” <chairman@ukip.org>
Cc: “George Curtis, UKIP Eastern Counties Chairman” <gscurtis@aspects.net>; “John Savory,
UKIP Eastern Counties Norfolk Member” gillian.savory@onetel.com>;
“Peter Reeve, UKIP Eastern Counties Organiser” <reeve@ukip.org>; “Office of Jeffrey Titford
MEP” ukipeastadmin@intamail.com>;
“Glenn Tingle (chairman UKIP Norwich)” <tingo@btinternet.com>; “Stuart Agnew
(UKIP Norwich cttee)” stuart.agnew@btconnect.com>;
“Steve Emmens (UKIP Norwich cttee)” <steve.memmens@ntlworld.com>;
“John Woodhead (treasurer UKIP Norwich” reedhamjohn@btconnect.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 10:02 AM
Subject: Clarification

You will not be surprised to know that I receive unsolicited emails from
thespammer Greg Lance-Watkins.
One recently referred to a meeting at Newmarket at the end of September and
a”unanimous declaration” of representatives of a number of constituencies.
Theimpression given was that these people were representative of the
EasternCounties as a whole.This is not so. Neither I nor my branch
chairman were aware of this meetingbefore it took place.
Therefore the declaration does not represent Norwichbranch at all (three
constituencies).Furthermore, I contacted some other committee members of various
Norfolkbranches, none of whom had been aware of it either.I have also read of
criticisms of the Eastern Counties Committee, and of theRegional Organiser,
which I find quite bizarre.
Peter Reeve has always beenmost helpful to this branch, in particular he
has organised meetings for branchcommittee members in the county are proving
invaluable.
Regarding the MEP selection process, I was very impressed by the quality of
thecandidates at the hustings, all of whom were far far better, IMHO, than the
twowannabes who have been complaining.
Regards
John Youles
Secretary, UK Independence Party Norwich Branch
Tel: 01603 407152 Mob: 07941 343824 Fax: 08444 171626
— No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG.Version:
7.5.549 / Virus Database: 270.8.5/1755 – Release Date: 29/10/08 17:27

This reads rather more as if it was written by a virus!

eColi by the duplicitous and underhand brown nosing!

Let us look at it in some detail:

You will not be surprised to know that I receive unsolicited emails from thespammer Greg Lance-Watkins.

Well at least SOMEONE is keeping him informed!
Isn’t it funny how one is classified as a spammer if you are publishing facts and the truth that some wish to keep hidden – whereas their liars, cheats and corruption is portrayed as ‘Lobbying’ – they do let themselves and those they represent down by being so childishly transparent and predictable.Ever name calling like children in a playground!

One recently referred to a meeting at Newmarket at the end of September and a”unanimous declaration” of representatives of a number of constituencies. Theimpression given was that these people were representative of the EasternCounties as a whole.

Do not lie John, it ill becomes you – NOWHERE did I state it represented the entirety of the Eastern Counties I clearly stated that the invitation would seem to have been widespread and that of the 21 Constituency branches ALL 21 signed the declaration.

John your commentary though predictable is dishonest.

You will note from the oleagenous Gollom’s response that he has identified 4 more active branches but they did not attend. Would this standard of dishonesty be how you would expect EUkip to Govern if it was ever elected to any office?

This is not so. Neither I nor my branch chairman were aware of this meetingbefore it took place. Therefore the declaration does not represent Norwichbranch at all (three constituencies).

How grossly inefficient of you – I knew before the meeting and not from someone who organised it or was attending – no wonder with your display of awareness EUkip merely garnered 117 votes in the recent By Election, a massive EUkip style 0.03%

One of the big problems with EUkip, as I have always said, is in 15 years they have failed to put in place an organisational structure – lines of communications and trained competence – don’t bitch about the messenger when you have so clearly proved my point.

Furthermore, I contacted some other committee members of various Norfolkbranches, none of whom had been aware of it either.

How clearly you prove me right – is it any wonder that the corrupt leadership and NEC become arrogant and believe they can treat the members like dirt as they cheat and lie to keep their snouts in the EU troughs and aid their cronies.

With a structure as crass and amateur as you admit to here are you really surprised at the extent to which they cheat and lie?

I have also read of criticisms of the Eastern Counties Committee, and of theRegional Organiser, which I find quite bizarre.

What planet is this little lad on? Rather than trying to belittle the messenger can I suggest you try to keep in touch with what is going on – I try my best but perhaps my new blog will help you keep up with the facts .
The URL is:
http://caterpillarsandbutterflies.blogspot.com

Peter Reeve has always been most helpful to this branch, in particular he has organised meetings for branchcommittee members in the county are proving invaluable.

One has to wonder what he wants from you in view of the damaging interference he has orchestrated in other branches and the fact that his mistress was dishonestly ‘placed’ on the NEC – not to mention the various branches that have voted, in accord with the constitution, and have deselected him – together with liars and cowards like George Curtis and the unprofessional and dishonest Andrew Smith who has put the party at risk of losing upto A MILLION POUNDS with his irresponsible behaviour in cahoots with the insecure idiot Nigel Farage.

IF Reeve was any damned good he would have ensured you knew about the Newmarket meeting where 21 branches were represented, however he was obviously too busy plotting to orchestrate dishonest and unconstitutional witch hunts and kangaroo courts – not to mention a major local rally at which the discredited and dishonest deputy leader spoke in a hired hall, after advertising widely, to less than 12 people.

I wonder if NuttAll could have got 21 branches represented at Newark – he failed at Capel St. Mary.

Regarding the MEP selection process, I was very impressed by the quality of thecandidates at the hustings, all of whom were far far better, IMHO, than the twowannabes who have been complaining.

Who might these so called ‘wanabes’ be?

The liar, fraud, cheat and all round failure David the desk Bannerman?
or
The braggart and bully Stuart Agnew who boasts he has paid enough to buy the position and brings no diplomatic or political skill to the arena, merely self importance and greed!

Might it be the dishonest slippery Gollom, currently we understand under investigation by both the Essex Police
(who are I understand awaiting response from OLAF on Titford & Gulleford for substantive allegations of fraud, money laundering and embezzling, which one must hope they will be cleared of as they will then possibly be facing investigation and charges for ‘abuse of computer data’ having hacked into the private mail of the past Chairman Petrina Holdsworth and the past General Secretary Geoffrey Kingscott and possibly others).

Where were you when the Returning Officer’s report of the corruption under your nose was made public – ‘Turning A Blind Eye’ or doing an impersonation of all three of the wise monkeys!

John – don’t be a twerp, you really can’t be that stupid!You damage your credibility by trying to defend the indefensible AFTER the events have been made public!

—– Forwarded Message —-

From: Stuart Gulleford ukipeast@intamail.com
To: Paul Nuttall ; John Youles jbyoules@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: George Curtis ; gillian.savory@onetel.com;
ukipeastadmin@intamail.com; tingo ;
steve.memmens@ntlworld.com; John Woodhead ;
shawforddavid@hotmail.com; alanbown@btinternet.com; cgill36@hotmail.co.uk;
davidfabbott@btinternet.com; dcbdcbuk@yahoo.co.uk; del1young@yahoo.co.uk;
derekrclark@hotmail.co.uk; douglas.denny@btopenworld.com;
greg@glanceback.demon.co.uk; ukipse@ukip.org; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com;
lisa.duffy2@tesco.net; martaandreasen@auna.com; mazuckerman@bensonmazure.co.uk;
nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu; ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk; rjoxley@lineone.net; susan@keymerhaslam.co.ukSent:
Thursday, 30 October, 2008 10:30:55
Subject: Re: ClarificationThanks for this

John.
I would add that I am a branch chairman – Brentwood & Ongar and I
wasn’t invited either. That gets us up to four constituencies not
included. Any advance?

The Newmarket meeting was a complete con in that the
invitation implied it was for campaign planning and people went along expecting
exactly that, not another platform for the fifth column we seem to have in our
midst. who are prepared to do anything they possibly can to disrupt the Eastern
Counties, at a time when we most need to pull together to be ready for the
European Election and the General Election that will follow soon
afterwards.

The ringleaders were very careful to ensure that no one who
was likely to publicly disagree with them was invited. One wonders who is
really behind them as their efforts benefit nobody but the other political
parties, who oppose us in our fight for an independent Britain.

I gather that another fifth column meeting is to held in Newmarket on 8th November. I hope that people will have wised up and the attendance will reflect the true nature of the level of support for this nonsense.

It would also be beneficial if we managed to get some members there who are prepared to oppose these troublemakers.

Best wishes
Stuart Gulleford

ChairmanBrentwood & Ongar
Constituency Association>

So let us consider what the oiliferous and untrustworthy Gollom has actually had to say:

Thanks for this John.

It is always so nice to have someone who will boot lick isn’t it!

I would add that I am a branch chairman – Brentwood & Ongar and I wasn’t invited either. That gets us up to four constituencies not included. Any advance?

Have you actually got more than 21+ 4 branches left after the damage done to EUkip by yourself and the leadership – Tom Wise (STILL not only a member but a branch chairman until a couple of weeks ago!

The membership has collapse and you would be astonished how many of the people I phone who have dropped out of UKIP in disgust – Active members avidly read my newsletters and I get 100s of incoming eMails a day to my computer but I do get a few ill mannered abusive comments from people too stupid to be able to read – that get deleted automatically.

The Newmarket meeting was a complete con in that the invitation implied it was for campaign planning and people went along expecting exactly that, not another platform for the fifth column we seem to have in our midst.

It is clear you are not very bright but I didn’t realise you were so stupid as to show yourself for a fool in one sentence!

CONSIDER:
You State (The Newmarket meeting was a complete con) so therefore everyone was, according to you ‘duped’ into attending – but interestingly of the activists who attended, conned on the belief they were there to discuss tactics etc. at what was a widely advertised meeting – 21 out of 21 Constituencies signed the Newmarket Declaration.

Rather than hang around damaging UKIP – why don’t you go and get a real job, there is surely a limit to how long the EUroSceptic movement can be expected to support such a destructive, self interested parasite. Or is it that you are unemployable outside your greasy pit!

who are prepared to do anything they possibly can to disrupt the Eastern Counties, at a time when we most need to pull together to be ready for the European Election and the General Election that will follow soon afterwards.

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE to try to clean up the Eastern Region?
What example have you set in your salaried position cheating in the selection process, spreading dissent and fermenting trouble.

Even your own Returning Officer said your conduct in the Eastern Region was unacceptable and the process should be re-run.

What have you done to get rid of the liar, fraud and cheat Bannerman etc. etc. – NO NOTHING for as long as it suited YOU.

You are contemptible!

The ringleaders were very careful to ensure that no one who was likely to publicly disagree with them was invited.

Were that true honest men and women of integrity would applaud them for their wisdom – Just look how corrupt YOUR Region has become:

One MEP under arrest and on Bail for a series of crimes as reported in the media and clearly known to many.

YOU creeping around with vile little letters, plotting and scamming.

An entire selection process corrupt and corrupted and a lead candidate CHOSEN not elected who is a disgrace to the party.

No wonder less than 12 people turned up to HIS Rally!

One wonders who is really behind them as their efforts benefit nobody but the other political parties, who oppose us in our fight for an independent Britain.

YOU DISHONEST GRUBBY LITTLE MAN – after the damage you have done and the collusion in the destruction of EUkip you have the nerve to TRY to accuse decent men and women of undermining filth like YOU.

The remaining Patriots in what was UKIP are trying desperately hard to rid it of the salaried, showboating, self seeking creeps who have made it a party no individual of integrity would consider supporting.

Am I being too honest for YOU?

CONSIDER:

UKIP had 29,500 members in 2004

it now has about 6,000 active members.

Head Office even quietly admits that the membership is falling daily, but pretend it is around 14,000 – implausible twaddle.

0.03% voted EUkip in the last by election – for every EUkip vote Labour at the bottom of their popularity got 170 votes.

EUkip has £45,000 in its piggy bank whilst facing forfeitures & Costs of up to £1,000,000 on ONE case alone.

EUkip hasn’t a single backer of substance left.

The one backer is a retired bookie who has been DUPED & LIED TO thus conning him into thinking he must pay the costs incurred by Farage & Smith!

NEED I GO ON?

I gather that another fifth column meeting is to held in Newmarket on 8th November.

Not the most intelligent language for you to use when talking of a number of your long term Branch Chairmen and UKIP loyalists seeking desperately to clean up the filth that EUkip has become to make it electable.

I hope that people will have wised up and the attendance will reflect the true nature of the level of support for this nonsense.

Yes there were only 20 present this time but with more appologies – almost twice as many as attended that liar, failure & Fraud Bannerman’s RALLY, which was so widely advertised!

It would also be beneficial if we managed to get some members there who are prepared to oppose these troublemakers.

We must remind you that you sent along two plants and to judge by the briefing they received they were complete cabbages’, but having found their briefing was a pack of lies they looked like radishes they were so embarrassed – the audience of chairmen must have thought they smelt like durion because it wasn’t long before they scuttled out like rats with their tails between their legs.

Astonishing really when you consider that Ian Jonathan Smith thought he was an expert on M15 and tried, with lack lustre support from the hapless little Herbert Hitt, to explain how M15 functioned and in so doing clearly and publicly slandered me, both in fact and by implication – however I’m not entirely certain that an ill informed imbecile would be held responsible for his lies in a Court of Law particularly since he could no doubt prove who had briefed him.

Gulleford may I suggest you do everyone a favour, but most especially yourself, LEAVE EUkip as a part of the cleaning up process and please NEVER again act as a parasite in the EUroSceptic movement you have done it consistent damage year in year out – just look at the mess EUkip is in in the Eastern Region, and that ALL took place on YOUR watch.

No wonder the CIB were so relieved when they were shot of you.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

Posted in Alan Bown, Bannerman, Duffy, Eastern Region, EUkip, Gollom, Gulleford, Nuttall, Politics, Reeve, TITFORD, Tom WISE, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

#112* – Eastern Region Rises Against Corruption of EUkip Leadership It Seems!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 08/11/2008

#112* – Eastern Region Rises Against Corruption of EUkip Leadership It Seems!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S CORRUPTION & FARAGE’S REICHSTAG FIRE!

Hi,

I though we could get back to showing just how corrupt the management of EUkip is by mailing copies of a few eMails that are in circulation amongst certain members of the NEC & leadership of EUkip – some have come direct from the EU and some from those who are amongst or with access to leadership or NEC computers including their owners 😉

Sorry not to supply Mr. Farage and his corrupt cronies and Brown Shirts with further identities to add to his Reichstag Fire expulsion lists once he has enacted his Hitler style Enabling Act thereby dispensing with the Disciplinary Committee structure, deselecting those on the NEC who will not act as his puppets and muppets, suspending the Constitution and subsuming to himself and a few enforcers the right to expel people who will not go along with his lies, deceptions, duplicity and determination to at all cost get re-elected to the troughs on the gravy train.

It increasingly looks like: the only real funding will be siphoned to fund Farage getting his snout back in the EU troughs and then clearly the funds will be depleted – Farage’s idiot milch cow Alan Bown will have spent out – having been fool enough to pay for Nigel Farage & Andrew Smith’s unprofessional and irresponsible antics and lies.

Any Court cases will be brought against EUkip, where the duped NEC are bankers of last resort, and Farage will most probably jump ship.

He has already PROVED he is duplicitous, selfish, incompetent, without any leadership skills, unable to delegate, corrupt and dishonest. He and his cronies have also proved that they have no reputation to uphold nor have I ever wittingly misled or lied or they would have slapped a writ on me! However TRUTH is my provable defence 😉

Political Parties and men of integrity sue to defend their name not to make money!

I have ONLY told the truth – whether you like it or not.

You have my name, my address & my phone number – I have offered to be cross examined to establish I am telling the truth, at any mutually convenient time and place; before a public audience – those who I have exposed as liars, frauds, cheats, spivs and fools are more than welcome to cross examine me, to try to establish my details and opinions about them are untrue and or libellous, as I have NO wish to mislead or lie about anyone or anything.

How about these letters now 😉

Before you read them do be aware that George Curtis is a liar and corrupt – a coward, only too willing to curry favour by outright lies, as long as he thinks he will not be found out – he has been!

George Curtis has to my CERTAIN knowledge lied about me and also Robin Page & John West – I have read George Curtis’s weedling report to the NEC and also his eMail to the corrupt self appointed regional committee, which as we know harbours also the proven cheat and rascal Andrew Smith.

Smith acting WITH Farage and others looks as if he may well cost EUkip between £500,000 and £1,000,000 with his dishonesty and lies, in cahoots with Nigel Farage, David Lott and others.

George Curtis is a revolting coward and a sordid low life who when confronted on the phone was unable to give honest account of his grubby behaviour.

Anyway do read these letters from the NEC archives 😉

Dear All’
I would not normally interfere in another branch’s business, but in view of the contents and the fact that I have been copied in I will.
According to the rules as in force when this new committee first met, it was not elected as the rules then dictated. It was appointed by Tom Wise, which was not a legitimate means of ‘election’.
David Bannerman was given full\ documentation as to the illegality of the committee, and he repeatedly promised to sort it out. However he did not do this, and when he left the Party Chairmanship, the dosier was handed to John Whittacker, who maintained e-mail contact with me keeping me up-to-date with his progress in the matter. He replied to an e-mail of mine early this year with words to the effect that the problem had been sorted, because the new rules published in February 2008 would apply.
George Curtis’\problem now is that he has not followed the Feb 08 rules, so the committee is still\ illegal, and has been since early 2006. Incidentally he also illegally dissolved the previous committee.

George Curtis p.s. at the end of the invitation for the 29th Nov meeting is untrue, the activists who have been in regular contact and will be at the next meeting, meet for the good of UKIP and Britain, and` are fed-up with the rule-breaking at all levels of UKIP, not to mention the lies and deceit.There will be some senior UKIP members there and I strongly suggest that G Curtis sendsout a retraction of his p.s.

yours with many good reasons for fighting against the EU,

Martin HARVEY

In a message dated 07/11/2008 12:03:49 GMT Standard Time, reeve@ukip.org writes:

To Peter Cole.

Again your email is completely inaccurate and misleading. The email referring to ‘batches’ was sent to your home email yesterday.
RE: INVITATION
From:
PETER REEVE (reeve@ukip.org)
Sent:
06 November 2008 13:06:43
To:
peter cole(home) (kingcolehole@ntlworld.com)

Please also note that : Georges role as the Eastern Counties Chairman’s is legitimate. We have, on several occasions, checked with the appropriate people in the hierarchy of Party that there is no problem and all relevant individuals have been happy that both the committee and its officers are sound until just after the European Elections 2009.

Hope this helps. Pete
Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties

From: peterc@tomwisemep.co.uk
To: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk; reeve@ukip.org
CC: MartinHarveyONR@aol.com; johnwest81@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: meeting 29th Nov. & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:13:40 +0000

Good morning Len,

To-date I have NOT been notified by Mr Reeve about ‘Batches’. I must agree with your last statement about Mr Reeve standing down but as Mr Curtis is a self appointed so called chairman of an unlawful committee I could not care less what he does as by UKIP’s own rules the position he states he holds does not exist!

Peterc

From: Len Baynes [mailto:lenbay@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: 07 November 2008 08:52
To: PETER REEVE
Cc: Peter Cole; MartinHarveyONR@aol.com ; johnwest81@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: meeting 29th Nov. & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.

Peter again you get it wrong please read my E-Mail as it was intended I quote ” If this situation is not resolved preety damn quick I will become independant” That in your wildest dreams is not a statement of fact, I was in this party long before you had even been on the distant horizon and will not get out just to allaviate a thorn in your side. I am afraid I cannot make the 29th of November due to a family birthday in Enfield but I am confident I will be truthfully informed of proceedings by my chairman.
As for my name on the national list it will be submitted when and if my branch select me and my chairman approves, I honestly think that is the right proceedure. But under the present situation I feel my call for you and Mr. Curtis to stand down is perfectly justified.

—– Original Message —–
From: PETER REEVE
To: Len Baynes ; peter cole(home) ; jan baynes ; george curtis
Cc: del1young@yahoo.co.uk ; derek norman ; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com ; john west ; martin harvey
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:46 PM
Subject: meeting 29th Nov.þ & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.

To Len Baynes, Thanks for your email (Copy below), which I have forwarded to George Curtis as requested. Your suggestion that I have not included Peter Cole in the circulation lists are inaccurate.

I have already explained to Peter Cole (and john West) in emails this morning that : (So the batch with ‘C’ in and the batch with ‘W’ in haven’t been sent out REALLY so what has and how come I know people whose name begins with both ‘C’ & ‘W’ that have received your grubby fiddlings?) “Because we have been very successful in recruiting a large number of candidates in the Eastern Counties the advert has gone out in several batches and will be completed by the end of the week.

I look forward to seeing you on the 29th Nov.”(Rubbish – you have the sum total of 1,770 members on your Eastern Region data base and of that 470ish have eMail addresses – Do cut the spin – EUkip’s corrupt leadership is FINISHED) I have also included a copy of the circular (below) for your and their attention.

However your stated intention to stand against a UKIP candidate in elections is interesting and could explain some of your recent activity.

You are currently not on that list as you have not applied. If I can help with any other matter please do let me know. Pete Peter ReeveRegional OrganiserUKIP Eastern Counties reeve@ukip.org07792 290434Circular :
Subject: FW: Sat 29th Nov – valuable meeting date for your diary!þ

To all Branch Chairmen, (That we haven’t dishonestly removed) Westminster Prospective Candidates (That we haven’t dishonestly removed) and Prospective Local Candidates (That we haven’t dishonestly removed) We are very pleased to invite you to a full campaign briefing & discussion (Propaganda and spin rally to tell you a pack of lies?

We will also provide the latest fantasies in the Reichstag Fire Ploy to seize control of the party – your help is needed to aid this corruption) There will be senior party members present (That we haven’t dishonestly removed) who will give us details of the campaign plans and provide plenty of time for question and lies.

We will also have a full policy Question and Lie session, to go through any part of the manifesto or specific policy detail that you wish to discuss and address. Will Bannerman be resigning having lied to the party and brought EUroScepticism into disrepute and will he resign from his EU job that involves promoting the EU?

The aim of this meeting is to be an interactive session where senior party members can listen to your ideas and thoughts as well as provide answers to any questions that you have. I will provide details of the venue and full agenda very shortly. Please will you keep free in your diary for this valuable Reichstag rally.

Please do feel free to invite your branch officers and activists’ to come along and participate. If you have any queries please contact your Regional Organiser on (I’m not here to advertise corruption) Regards George Curtis Eastern Counties Chairman (Self Appointed Liar)

PS : We confirm that this an official UKIP meeting on CUT. We understand that some people may be inviting some branch chairmen etc. to an unofficial meeting in Newmarket (around 8th Nov) designed largely to attack the Party (NO Mr. Curtis you will find it is to expose liars like you).

They are attempting to disguise this as a meeting for activists, but we stress this is not official, not authorised, and no senior members will be present (Well that is a relief it will prevent them having to listen to liars like you or the sordid little desk delivery man Bannerman the liar, cheat and fraudster working for the EU).

We do recommend you attend this meeting. If you have any queries please do contact *******..[THE PHONE NUMBER THE LIAR GEORGE CURTIS GIVES IS THAT OF PETER REEVE ONE TIME RO BUT DESELECTED BY VARIOUS BRANCHES AND SUBJECT OF NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS TO THE NEC.] Peter Reeve lives with Lisa Duffy & her children and I gather a few of his – you will note La Duffy dishonestly gained her seat on the NEC and will no doubt be voting on the matter of Peter Reeve and the subject of those who have lodged legitimate complaints against Peter Reeve.

George Curtis’s phone number is: 01206 – 322 3221 Do phone him up and point out he is a liar and a coward and the meeting on the 8th. is very much official as it has been openly advertised with due notice

From: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk
To: reeve@ukip.org
CC: peterc@tomwisemep.co.uk; del1young@yahoo.co.uk; rebeldel@talktalk.net; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com; johnwest81@hotmail.com; MartinHarveyONR@aol.com
Subject: meeting 29th Nov.
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:59:21 +0000

Peter please forward this to George Curtis. your actions in not inviting our branch chairman are at least diabolical and at best a downright insult.

I shall be standing in the local elections next year for Doddington and my name will go forward as PPC for NE. Cambs and I will do this with or without your sanction if need be as a independant. The actions of the present leadership and NEC, over the question of Mr. Abbott and Mr. Edmonds fill me with disgust and I am afraid if the present situation is not resolved preety damn quick I will become independant and stand against the official UKIP candidate and I know I have the following from the last election to make an impact.

I call on you both now in the interest of the party to stand down.

(DON’T BE SILLY LEN THESE ODIOUS CREEPS ARE LIKE THE COMMENT ON SH*t & BLANKETS – THEY ARE LIARS AND CHEATS BULLYS AND IN THIS FOR PERSONAL SELF GAIN. G.L-W.)
Then here is another letter the author of which I have removed as my NEC contact MIGHT not wish it to be known he had a copy of this 😉

Dear George Curtis

For one who has long been associated with an unelected “committee” to refer to the Newmarket meeting as you do in your postscript is laughably impertinent, in fact from anyone with any substance it would be slightly insulting.

The Newmarket meeting comprised grass roots members of the party most of whom have no political ambitions beyond the withdrawal of Britain from the E.U.. A number of us are members of long standing and of proven loyalty; far from wishing to damage the party we aim to strengthen it through the elimination of unconstitutional and undemocratic practises.

Nigel Farage has often said “This is a grass roots party.” and paid lip service to the debt owed to the “grass roots”. A modicum of leadership at N.E.C. level would have resolved our position long ago, instead we have been treated with condescension and disparagement.

This one is about the great arsehole of the East the liar, coward and general low life George Curtis and his dishonest attack on the meeting of the 8th. November – what a creep he is!
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:42:53 +0000The unelected chairman of an unelected committee has the nerve to attack an elected chairman for holding a meeting.

You couldn’t make it up.
John West

From: reeve@ukip.org
To: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk; kingcolehole@ntlworld.com; jan-clark@tiscali.co.uk; gscurtis@aspects.net
CC: del1young@yahoo.co.uk; rebeldel@talktalk.net; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com; johnwest81@hotmail.com; martinharveyonr@aol.com
Subject: meeting 29th Nov.‏ & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:46:17 +0000
To Len Baynes,
Thanks for your email (Copy below), which I have forwarded to George Curtis as requested.

Your suggestion that I have not included Peter Cole in the circulation lists are inaccurate.

I have already explained to Peter Cole (and john West) in emails this morning that :

“Because we have been very successful in recruiting a large number of candidates in the Eastern Counties the advert has gone out in several batches and will be completed by the end of the week. I look forward to seeing you on the 29th Nov.”

I have also included a copy of the circular (below) for your and their attention. However your stated intention to stand against a UKIP candidate in elections is interesting and could explain some of your recent activity.

You are currently not on that list as you have not applied. If I can help with any other matter please do let me know.
Pete
Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties
07792 290434

Circular : from The Curtis chappie [*CUT* BORING!!!]

MORE!!!
From: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk
To: MartinHarveyONR@aol.com; johnwest81@hotmail.com
Subject: Fw: Selection of PPC
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:29:15 +0000

Having been through this process twice ,I am certain the branch acceptasnce comes first and then the selection panel or maybe I am getting senile, or heaven forbid Mr. Reeve has got it wrong yet again

—– Original Message —–
From: PETER REEVE
To: Len Baynes
Cc: jan baynes
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 12:21 PM
Subject: Selection of PPC

Len Please let me clarify. BEFORE you approach a branch for selection you MUST FIRST be on the National Approved list. This requires you to first apply to the process, then have an interview (The selection panel is organised by and includes the regional organiser). You will then be informed if you are on the approved list or not.

If you get onto the approved list – Then and ONLY then can you make an application to a constituency Association or Branch. Tom Wise, John West and Peter Cole all went through the process with varying outcomes and may be able to help you understand. I look forward to receiving your application form. If you require a copy of the form to complete, please let me know. I have again copied the Fenland Secretary into this email to confirm she is aware of the appropriate process.
Thanks.
Peter Reeve
Regional Organiser
UKIP Eastern Counties
reeve@ukip.org
07792 290434

From: lenbay@tiscali.co.uk
To: reeve@ukip.orgCC: peterc@tomwisemep.co.uk; MartinHarveyONR@aol.com; johnwest81@hotmail.comSubject:
Re: meeting 29th Nov.‏ & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:52:28 +0000

Peter again you get it wrong please read my E-Mail as it was intended I quote ” If this situation is not resolved preety damn quick I will become independant” That in your wildest dreams is not a statement of fact, I was in this party long before you had even been on the distant horizon and will not get out just to allaviate a thorn in your side. I am afraid I cannot make the 29th of November due to a family birthday in Enfield but I am confident I will be truthfully informed of proceedings by my chairman. As for my name on the national list it will be submitted when and if my branch select me and my chairman approves, I honestly think that is the right proceedure. But under the present situation I feel my call for you and Mr. Curtis to stand down is perfectly justified.

—– Original Message —–
From: PETER REEVE
To: Len Baynes ; peter cole(home) ; jan baynes ; george curtis
Cc: del1young@yahoo.co.uk ; derek norman ; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com ; john west ; martin harvey
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 2:46 PM
Subject: meeting 29th Nov.‏ & Len Baynes intention to stand against UKIP in elections.

To Len Baynes,
Thanks for your email (Copy below), which I have forwarded to George Curtis as requested.
Your suggestion that I have not included Peter Cole in the circulation lists are inaccurate.

I have already explained to Peter Cole (and john West) in emails this morning that :

Thanks for letting me know. Please may I remind you, your Chairman and your Secretary via this email, t hat only candidates on the ‘National Approved List’ may go forward to a Constituency to be considered for selection as a Westminster Candidate for UKIP. You are currently not on that list as you have not applied.
If I can help with any other matter please do let me know.
Pete
Peter Reeve
Regional OrganiserUKIP Eastern Counties

It is amazing that with this sort of behaviour – the lies and dishonesty that was the scam to its cronies as PPCs for the EU where they were happy to fleece members for £250 to compete in a rigged election and then steal £1,000 from those they listed to do the hustings work with no chance, agreeing Farage can personally select the top candidates in each region in April.
JUST HOW STUPID ARE EUkip CANDIDATES
and where did Bannerman scrape up £1,000 or has he sold the desk!

EUkip leadership & NEC have admitted they are corrupt and that is why they refunded the money for breech of contract to several candidates who demanded it (including Lynnda Robson, Robin Page and no doubt others – at the moment I gather claims have been lodged in the Courts by others!).

They KNOW that EUkip hasn’t a leg to stand on as their internal report by their own Returning Officer clearly stated the election was corrupt and should be re-run by a trustworthy body as the Leadership had proved untrustworthy – which is why I published the facts.

I hope the honest members who turn up to the meeting later today will be able to make forward strides to clean up the party in the East working towards removal of liars, cheats, the corrupt, the self interested and the crooks – the likes of Bannerman, Reeve, Duffy, Gulleford, Titford, Curtis, Smith, Agnew, Whitmore & similar pond life attracted by the troughs on the gravy train.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:LEAVE THE EU

Posted in AGNEW, Bannerman, Curtis, Duffy, Eastern Region, EUkip, Farage, Gollom, Gulleford, Politics, Reeve, Reichstag Fire, TITFORD, UKIP, Whitmore | Leave a Comment »

#100* – Saturday 1st. Brings More EUkip Lies!!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 01/11/2008

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership & NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable

#100* – Saturday 1st. Brings More EUkip Lies!!

Hi,

I Repeat my statement from posting #99* David Bannerman, David Campbell, David Campbell Bannerman or what ever his real identity is is a fraud, a liar and a cheat whose involvement with EUkip has indisputably brought the party into disrepute.

May I also add there is a possibility he is still in the employ of the Tory Party to damage EUkip but it is a proven certainty that he is in the employ of the EU in direct breech of UKIP Constitution and Rules.

For whom is the Deputy Leader of EUkip working?

Clearly as he is a proven liar and NOT the person he claimed to be his word on anything is invalid and his membership of EUkip is invalid.

Will this duplicitous little man have the integrity to resign or will he have to be dumped by a legally constituted Disciplinary Hearing for bringing EUkip into disrepute and providing a dishonest CV to get the job – or will EUkip’s NEC decide a kangaroo Court is more fitting since that is what is being used against others?

Before bringing you upto date with an eMail I have received from 2 NEC sources separately!May I bring it to your attention that Bannerman has yet again brought EUkip into disrepute with dishonesty and false threats.

Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:52:34 +0000
From: dcbdcbuk@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: David Bannerman email
To: shawforddavid@hotmail.com; alanbown@btinternet.com; cgill36@hotmail.co.uk; davidfabbott@btinternet.com; del1young@yahoo.co.uk; derekrclark@hotmail.co.uk; douglas.denny@btopenworld.com; eric_edmond@hotmail.com; eric.edmond@tiscali.co.uk; ukipse@ukip.org; jill_seymour@btopenworld.com; lisa.duffy2@tesco.net; martaandreasen@auna.com; mazuckerman@bensonmazure.co.uk; ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk; rjoxley@lineone.net; susan@keymerhaslam.co.uk; johnwest81@hotmail.com

Dear Mr West,

Thank you. I believe you are referring to the confidential document supplied to NEC members only concerning a disciplinary submission against Dr Edmond ? Others have reported this document being shown around, and who by. As a breach of confidentiality can result in instant dismissal from the NEC under the Constitution, I am most grateful to you for your personal confirmation of this breach.

You are well aware of the libellous remarks you made against me, and which you have refused to apologise for ( your statement reproduced below, which was followed by other libellous remarks ). I have never claimed that you reported me to the police, though I understand you made a complaint against Stuart Gulleford and Jeffrey Titford to the Essex Police, which they have found to have no basis whatsoever. This is also referred to in your statement reproduced below.

Your constant harassment of NEC members and other party members, including myself with entirely false accusations of dishonesty, corruption and fraud, and on an almost daily basis, is totally unacceptable.

I therefore inform you that I am taking this matter directly to the Metropolitan Police´s political unit in an appointment next week, on grounds of criminal defamation and abuse, serious offences punishable under the Harassment Act 1997.

I will be asking the police at that meeting to investigate all those that have been engaged in these vile, selfish and disloyal attacks on the party. This a time when we should be preparing for essential elections next year, not being diverted by self-serving rants, and you have to question the motive. You yourself are ( currently ) a UKIP PPC and yet you regard it as acceptable to go to the Secretary General of the European Parliament to protest at my legitimate UKIP activities. I have your e mail and this is also being supplied to the police.

I confirm I will be providing the police too with copies of all your other e mails, and with all the relevant e mails of Gregg Lance Watkins ( or is it Lance-Watkins or just Watkins ? ), amongst others. The police also have the power to require webhosts to reveal the e mail identity of contributors to such websites.

Yours Sincerely,

David Campbell Bannerman

E mail statement by John West July 2008

—– Original Message —–

From: john west
To: del young ; Derek Clark ; Derek Hackett ; Derek Norman ; dinnydonald@aol.com ; elaine@benhall.plus.com ; Frances Fox ; Fred & Liz OWEN ; Geoffrey Collier ; gerald baxter ; grahamwood32@yahoo.co.uk ; helene.davies@hinchingbrooke.nhs.uk ; hudson.cgerard@btconnect.com ; Ian Hawkins ; ian.anderson@netmatters.co.uk ; ind-uk@yahoogroups.com ; j parker ; James Carver ; jan-clark@tiscali.co.uk ; Janet Davies ; Jason Barker ; Jenny Bond ; John Woodhead ; john.barry23@ntlworld.com ; john.whittaker@lancaster.ac.uk ; johncroft@maximsuk.com ; junelart@hotmail.co.uk ; kingcolehole@ntlworld.com ; kwawakom@aol.com ; Len Baynes ; Leonard Bruce UKIP Member ; lesley.may1@btinternet.com ; lisa.duffy2@tesco.net ; Lynnda Robson ; mail@ukip.org ; MartinHarveyONR@aol.com ; Michael Heaver ; michaelstone@talktalk.net ; Mr.D ; Mr.David Hepburn
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:07 PM
Subject: John West. A statement to UKIP members and the Press

As the press have contacted me I wish to make the following statement.

Evidence has been given to me of alleged criminal activity at the office of Jeffrey Titford MEP. These allegations involve both financial irregularities and alleged offences under the Computer Misuse Act 1990.

As a law abiding citizen I had no choice but to contact the police. I cannot turn a blind eye to allegations of corruption involving senior members of the party.

I have also been provided with information about David Campbell Bannerman, Deputy Leader of the UK Independence Party. This information concerns allegations of bribery involving both Mr Bannerman and another member of the party. These allegations were passed on to both Mr Christopher Gill and Dr John Whittaker of the UK Independence Party. Neither of whom have seen fit to acknowledge my complaints.

I have no further comments to make at this time.

John West,
Chairman UKIP Ipswich & East Suffolk
UKIP PPC Ipswich North & Suffolk Central

PLEASE BE ADVISED:

I Greg Lance-Watkins am happy to swear and attest that I have ever reason to believe that the facts and details in Mr. West’s eMail above are accurate and correct in substance and in detail. Mr. Bannerman is a proven liar and his evidence can not be trusted nor can his word as proven.

SO LET US ADDRESS FACT not Bannerman’s posturing, lies and sneers – item by item:

Dear Mr West,

>Thank you. I believe you are referring to the confidential document supplied to NEC members only concerning a disciplinary submission against Dr Edmond ?<

So as deputy Leaderr this fraud and proven liar from the Tories is happy to leap to conclusions – he hasn’t even ascertained whether he is talking about the same subject!!

>Others have reported this document being shown around, and who by.<

On the matter of the childish and malicious ‘Submission’ regarding Dr. Eric Edmond and the string of trumped up claims against him for a Kangaroo Court on Monday to be presented and carried out by a rigged and duplicitous cabal which is EUkip’s NEC having displaced sufficient honest men & women and APPOINTED individuals to suit its corrupt aims – The NEC is an organisation of shame not a leading body to aspire to.

More of that in the days to come!
To clarify who had made it known they had a copy – since you asked I published the fact that I had copies of your entire sickening documentation. You have absolutely no idea what source it comes from and that Mr. West read my mailing #99* with greater skill than you and was aware of the details I held gives you absolutely no idea when I obtained it and I do look forward to you slandering someone as my source!

>As a breach of confidentiality can result in instant dismissal from the NEC under the Constitution, I am most grateful to you for your personal confirmation of this breach. <

Bannerman is making a fool of himself as ever since he has no idea of my source – he does not even know who I know in the Ind.Dem.Group or my contacts with staff – nor has he a clue with whom I communicate in EUkip’s staff & NEC.

Perhaps we are having a display of why in 25 years with the Tory party Bannerman NEVER reached a level much above gofer and bag carrier – one only has to read his 6th. Form level uncosted and disjointed policies and his banal ‘SUBMISSION’ regarding Dr. Eric Edmond (as you will in time – line by line) to realise his inadequacy.

>You are well aware of the libellous remarks you made against me,<

How could anyone libel Bannerman he has no reputation to uphold – thus libel is impossible – he is a fraud, a liar and a cheat and not even the person he has claimed to be. This is just the bluster of a rascal.

>and which you have refused to apologise for ( your statement reproduced below, which was followed by other libellous remarks ).<

Why should anyone apologise to someone who lied to get his position, fraudulently misrepresented themselves in their CV and about whom it was clear he had implied preferment to individuals to benefit in the leadership and then in the scam to arrange the corrupt MEP selection list it became common knowledge that jobs WERE offered and there are no shortage of honest men and women who will attest to this – I was informed by a number of people that you had offered a job to Peter Reeve just as Tom Wise has had offers from the poisonous and venal Stuart Agnew who believes he has done enough to buy a position!

Why would anyone have any reason to not act dishonestly in your own gain as you have been proven to do so before and regularly.

>I have never claimed that you reported me to the police, though I understand you made a complaint against Stuart Gulleford and Jeffrey Titford to the Essex Police, which they have found to have no basis whatsoever. This is also referred to in your statement reproduced below. <

Bannerman – can you read?

Mr. West & I have written about this subject providing FACT not the level of colourful selection to present for kangaroo courts.

Mr. West has provided an accurate description why unlike the NEC and leadership he is and was unwilling to collude in crime after the fact.

You will recall that as a result of the corrupt enquiry by Trevor Colman the NEC and leadership wittingly colluded in a cover-up of the criminal activities of Tom Wise as exposed in the media.

Further despite the FACT that Tom Wise has beyond ALL doubt brought EUkip into disrepute AND has been arrested and has had his bail extended a further 3 months – yet he is still a member of EUkip, was never removed from the Ind.Dem.Group, has been custodian of the EUkip/In.Dem.Group bus, has been permitted to renew his membership, was until only a couple of weeks ago the Chairman of a EUkip branch – just as you Bannerman are still a member of EUkip despite bringing EUkip into disrepute as is Farage despite his whoring, profiteering, corruption, dishonesty and drunken racism as openly discussed – not to mention his failure to act transparently or honestly regarding call centres and other people’s money, as discussed frequently amongst members and others.

How is it now possible to bring EUkip into ddisrepute one may well ask!!

>Your constant harassment of NEC members and other party members,<

Bannerman – do you mean like following Party and then legal due process to address perceived criminal behaviour? It is appreciated that as a fraud and a liar you may well not have acted with integrity – yet you castigate Mr. West for acquitting himself with integrity – shame on you, though I do have witnessed statements available that the NEC would not have acted to expose crime based on various examples of their behaviour.

>including myself with entirely false accusations of dishonesty, corruption and fraud,<

Bannerman this is not possible as it has been proven time and time again that you are dishonest, corrupt and a fraud – why are you complaining about a member of UKIP who has the integrity to tell the truth and the courage to stand his ground despite your bullying. I well understand why you are threatening – I believe it is to try to discredit a series of substantive enquiries against you and your cronies, currently under investigation by the Police, DPA, OLAF and various other agencies.

>and on an almost daily basis, is totally unacceptable.<

If you find the truth and repetition of facts ‘unacceptable’ when will you act with integrity and resign?

>I therefore inform you that I am taking this matter directly to the Metropolitan Police´s political unit in an appointment next week,<

I feel sure they will be fascinated by your confession – it should be funny a Deputy Leader of a Political Claque who can not rebut and refute facts led by members and others and calls in the Police to try to clean up his party – Yet again Bannerman brings EUkip into disrepute!

>on grounds of criminal defamation and abuse, serious offences punishable under the Harassment Act 1997.<

I suggest you get more competent legal advice than the ridiculous Oxley who seems all too willing to issue her legal expertise to and for the party and Michael Zucherman’s efforts as a lawyer, as I have witnessed them, are risible.

DO GET A DECENT LAWYER who can read and will appreciate that in political office the repetition of the truth can not be considered harassment so do stop bullying – this is not the first time you have harassed Mr. Wise based on dishonest threats, when clearly Mr. Wise has been criminally attacked by EUkip and to date not so much as an apology has been issued officially – bluster and bullying of a wronged member to silence them is a shame on EUkip when it comes from a man who gained his position with lies and fraud.

It is also of interest that in breech of EUkip’s own Constitution Bannerman is known to be an EU employee and based upon his track record of dishonesty may well still be a Tory staffer!

>I will be asking the police at that meeting to investigate all those that have been engaged in these vile, selfish and disloyal attacks on the party.<

I can supply the details of your vile, selfish and disloyal attacks on the Party if you wish and would be happy to endorse your confession for the Met. If you promise to tell the truth and admit you are a fraud and lied.

>This a time when we should be preparing for essential elections next year,<

Oh you’ve woken up – when will the re-run of the selection process for candidates be as advocated by EUkip’s Returning Officer?What training has been done over the last 15 years to improve EUkip’s chances?

Personally your lies and fraud have done much to damage those prospects as have the lies that led to a Guilty Verdict in The Courts and a Judicial Review of the Party!A measure of your competence can be seen in the abject failure of the party to obtain ANY results of competence!Here are YOUR achievements as Deputy Leader:

In the six months, May –October there have been 130 by-elections at County or district-UA level.

UKIP have stood in 20 of them. Just 15% of the possible total.The votes won range from 0.8% to 23.8%.

Which break down as.0.8%-05%….11 wards.06%-10%……5 wards.10%-16%……3 wards.16%-24%…….1 ward.

Other than MEPs there are some 19,500 elected positions in these United Kingdoms of which EUkip hold less than 10Is this really the springboard for an increased vote next June? The dishonesty of Bannerman and others in the leadership are the primary cause of this catastrophic showing!

>not being diverted by self-serving rants, and you have to question the motive.<

We all know your motive Bannerman you grubby little man – just look at the damage you have done to the patriotic cause of getting Britain OUT of the EU.

>You yourself are ( currently ) a UKIP PPC and yet you regard it as acceptable to go to the Secretary General of the European Parliament to protest at my legitimate UKIP activities.<

This of course has come about because since you are a fraud, a liar and a cheat clearly your word could not be taken as your word is not valid.

I do note that there is still no sign of leadership clarifying how EUkip’s Deputy Leader can be clearly in breech of EUkip’s own Constitution and can be bound by an employment contract contra to his duties in opposition to membership of that corrupt body – It is hardly surprising that EUkip is so fractured and its membership and activists have diminished and split – even their own NEC are being used for witch hunts and kangaroo courts founded on centralising control in the hands of a small self interested group contra the well being and honesty members request.

>I have your e mail and this is also being supplied to the police. <

I do hope you will be supplying all the facts I have provided as well – that you are a fraud, a liar, a cheat and untrustworthy is not a matter of dispute and our providing the police with these facts will mean they can caution you appropriately.

>I confirm I will be providing the police too with copies of all your other e mails,<

All!!! – How have you achieved this or like Gullieford & Titford are alleged to have done have you also been downloading people’s confidential eMails?

>and with all the relevant e mails of Gregg Lance Watkins ( or is it Lance-Watkins or just Watkins ? ), amongst others.<

Only one G but never mind. I have not for over 40 years used only Watkins but you may if you wish demean yourself and misuse my common name which is Greg Lance-Watkins – the difference between us is that I have NEVER used any name other than my own with an intent to defraud in Britain.

I have for the purposes of work used various identities overseas I have commonly used the name Greg Lance-Watkins since you were in nappies. Unlike you I have not fraudulently lied as to my identity, nor have I falsified my identity for gain or to deceive.

Further I have NEVER laid claim falsely to relationship to minor politicians or failed Liberals! I have never used as provenance of my identity a piece of someone elses furniture and I have NEVER deliberately lied in any matter pertaining to EUkip or British politics.

But what you call me is a matter of utter indifference to me as I need only consider the gutter in which you are standing as a fraud who dishonestly gained his position based on lies.

>The police also have the power to require webhosts to reveal the e mail identity of contributors to such websites. <

Do you want mine now? – I use Demon (which I signed up with because Paul Sykes owned it at the time and he was a EUroSceptic) which is owned by Thus and BTconnect – I have NEVER used a false identity or pseudonym to deceive – unlike yourself, nor have I ever made a posting in a name designed to obscure my identity.

Do you want my address and phone number so that the Police can obtain a statement regarding your despicable behaviour.

Yours Sincerely,
David Campbell Bannerman

Now lady run along and get instructions from your various bosses and perform the required obeissances to gratify them but stop bringing EUkip into disrepute and stop behaving dishonestly.

Be man enough to admit you have repeatedly circulated dishonest eMails with lies about me that you can not substantiate CEASE & DESIST from telling Lies about me and harassing me by providing them to those whom you know will provide me with the details of your dishonesty.

Greg Watkins
Greg Lance Watkins
Greg Lance-Watkins
Greg
Greg L-W.
Greg @ Chepstow
GlanceBack
GlanceBack Chepstow
Greg 260146

None EVER used to deceive and listed here as Bannerman assumes everyone is a cheat like him and might be aiming to defraud as he has and does.

My FULL contact details are listed at the end of most of my eMails and they can readily be verified by phone or by checking the electoral role, alternatively you may as some of us have – access to my Bank Details, DVLA Record, Companies House, Tax Returns, IF you want other information which is harder to obtain do call me as I have nothing to hide and no fear of the truth – unlike Bannerman and others in EUkip I seek NO preferment nor income from Patriotism and my Country’s withdrawal from the EU, by Democratic Means but eventually if needed by any means I may deem in Britain’s interests.

#99* – Saturday 1st. Is The Start of Rebuild for UKIP.Then a couple of astonishing eMails from the Tory aid & EU employee the liar and fraud David The Desk:

‘I am sorry but you do not know half the story.

Amongst other things, John West libelled me and reported Jeffrey Titford and Stuart Gulleford to the Essex police on trumped up charges – these have now been comprehensively dismissed as nonsense.

He is now about to face serious disciplinary charges from a rich variety of complainants. Whilst there was one regrettable incident about YouTube, if anyone should apologise, it should be John West.

Please disregard these GLW diatribes – he is out to undermine UKIP.

We are not sure who he is working for, but we are determined to find out. His paymasters clearly do not have our interests at heart. ‘
Best wishes,
David CB

Dear Mr Bannerman,

I am in receipt, though a third party, of a letter which seems to be in general circulation.

Would you like to justify the comments made in this email?

Once again you have lied by claiming that I have libelled you. You also lied when you claimed that I had reported you to the Police. I provided you with clear proof that I had not done so but I have still to receive an apology from you.

To make matters worse you have made this lie public by circulating it to other members. You also mention Jeffrey Titford and Stuart Gullerford. I approached senior officials of the party about this matter and my concerns were dismissed. When asked by the original complainant what action the party had taken I explained that nothing had been done.

Therefore, in my capacity as a branch chairman, I had no option but to report to the Police what I saw as clearly a criminal breach of the Data Protection Act, together with apparent financial irregularities.

I also discussed this with my father, a former policeman, and was advised , subsequently confirmed by Essex police, that failure to report it would mean that both I and the original complainant could have been considered by the Police as ‘accessories after the fact’ for failing to report the alleged crime.

Further, in the interests of integrity, will you provide provenance for your claim regarding GLW?

I, like many others, deplore his style, but like you I am unable to refute his claims.

His endless string of leaks and statements of fact coming from the NEC, the EU and those close to it are now almost constant and yet the leadership seems unable to refute a single one of his allegations. We the membership, look to a leader who will stand for probity, decency and morality.

To slander people without proven substance is dishonest and demeans UKIP. I look forward to your speedy apology.
Yours Sincerely,
John West

followed by a comment by me about his lies:

To revisit the duplicity of the liar & fraud from the Tories David The Desk Bannerman:

>’I am sorry but you do not know half the story. Amongst other things, John West libelled me<

Bannerman – this is a lie as you are well aware. Just as is the pack of lies about your ancestry, which is almost as duplicitous as the CV you present relative to what can be found on the internet.

As proven by the fact that I disproved the ‘crock’ that was peddled about you when you first parachuted in from the Tories to drag UKIP’s name into the gutter in which you live as a fantasist claiming fraudulent status and dishonest relationships.

I would contend that WHATEVER West said about you it would be impossible for you to make a claim of libel stand in court (even had he) as your public persona is a lie and it is thus imposible to libel you – one needs a stature and truth to establish a libel – you have neither.

>and reported Jeffrey Titford and Stuart Gulleford to the Essex police<

I have often noted that the corrupt at the top of EUkip seem to believe they have an entitlement to ignore the law yet bully and lie about their members and other to defend themselves. There is no doubt that John West acted with total integrity in this matter – Do you David Campbell as a Tory claim that members of a political party in elected positions of trust should conceal what they perceive to be a crime?A very straight and simple Yes or No answer will suffice!

>on trumped up charges<

You may recal that there was first a denial from EUkip sources that ANY report had been made!Then EUkip claimed there was no enquiry!

I note there is now an admission in part that there is a Police enquiry though you have lied again about the allegations – you have also dishonestly implied that Mr. West has the authority to bring ‘charges’.

As you KNOW (or imply you know) the allegations perhaps you should enumerate them and when unable to establish that they were trumped up and that there was perceived financial irregularity on SEVERAL counts and for numerous £1,000s and when you can not PROOVE there was no downloading of eMails of a private nature from PRIVATE eMail addresses perhaps you can do something honets for once in your life (since all we have seen of you is founded on lies) Your foulsome apology for your lies about Mr. West are long overdue.

> – these have now been comprehensively dismissed as nonsense.<

No sir they have not – this is another of your lies – though since the threatening letter did not actually threaten physical bodily harm or death the police have agreed with the complainant to drop that potential charge!

The matters of abuse of tax payers money and possible money laundering are I understand ongoing with OLAF, who when they have gathered the relevant information will take a view on what steps to take next – you may recall the time it took to bring Tom Wise to ‘arrest’ for what seem to be similar crimes of deception it seems.

As for the matter of the breech of trusty and abuse of computers that will remain an open investigation inactive pending direct complaint being made by those, such as the Chairman at the time and the General Secretary who had their private correspondence hacked into I understand.I understand there are similar enquiries in the hands of OLAF pertaining to other individuals in the party particularly in the EU offices.

On the strength of these FACTS I believe I have comprehensively proved that David The Desk has yet again been proven a liar.

> He is now about to face serious disciplinary charges from a rich variety of complainants.<

Yes this is true and a kangaroo court process is being set up to prevent him representing the members on the NEC as he was democratically elected to do. Further, interestingly, a number of known cheats and liars in the party have been solicited for spurious complaints that are clearly being encouraged in return for preferment and are thus being made on the grounds of malice for gain it seems.

We shall know more of the spead of corruption over the next few days as the liars are forced to surface with their self serving stories for the NEC orchestrated dishonesty.Already, together with this eMail I have been sent an exchange of some 10+ eMails between Eric Edmond & various duplicitous and untrustworthy members of the EUkip NEC who are seeking to prevent him representing the 2,400 members who voted for him to represent their interests and the best interests of the party as he sees it.

Talking of trumped up charges you really must read the pompous drivel drawn up by this sad little failed Tory bag carrier – it is risible and that document alone would have an executive of a proper grown up company looking for a new job – This sordid little Tory liar has done NOTHING but bring EUkip into disrepute and has as you will be aware prostituted EUkip for HIS 30 pieces of silver as an EU employee.

>Whilst there was one regrettable incident about YouTube,<

’Regrettable’!!!! Regrettable!!

You really are a disgracefull little man Bannerman just how low will you sink for your own gain. The wording you are looking for if you had ANY integrity is ‘We deeply regret the criminal activity of a rogue employee who has been summarily dismissed without references or severance reward, we have written a letter of apology to Mr. West and his wife for any embarrassment, harm or damage they may perceive they have been cause and we as a Party and the responsible officers of the Party have unreservedly apologised and have clearly accepted our responsibility, we are obviously at the mercy of Mr. West to seek any reasonable damages however we hope that by adding him to the list in a draw for position and acting rapidly to acquit our duty in a manner we feel sure our members would wish we trust he will continue to work as a valued member of our party’.

Due to the incompetence of leadership EUkip now faces numerous related Court cases subsequent to which it is likely that Mr. West will, as with Mr. Page, seek punative damages – what staggering incompetence the leadership and NEC have shown!

>if anyone should apologise, it should be John West.<

What staggering arrogance from the unelected Deputy Leader of EUkip – on what grounds does this serial liar, bully, cheat and general Tory low life presume to to make so disgusting an allegation?

Perhaps, other than perhaps style or syntax, has Mr. West done ANYTHING that he could be believed to

>Please disregard these GLW diatribes<

What?

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE disregard the facts provided by G.L-W. as we can not show that a single word exposing corruption, dishonesty, incompetence, lies and fraud in EUkip is so much as inaccurate let alone untrue.That the egregious little filth – liar, fraud, cheat and dishonourable Bannerman who has been proven unreliable, unsound, bitchy and corrupt who can not, together with lawyers and all his corrupt colleagues, refute a single fact I have led seeks to BEG YOU not to believe the truth – how very EU!!!

> – he is out to undermine UKIP.<

Now that IS a libel as he has not one shred of evidence to back his lie and I am firmly and openly on record as wishing to destroy the corrupt and rotting head of EUkip to restore it to the members cleaned-up and distanced from the indisputable dishonesty and corruption that I and many others have proved and published.Let us see if the liar David Bannerman, or whatever his real name is, is sufficient of a man to apologise for his proven libel.

>We are not sure who he is working for, but we are determined to find out.<

The corrupt in EUkip have been making these comments for many years and a measure of their incompetence is their abject failure to make anything but childish playground insults in any way substantiated. Meanwhile again and again I have exposed liar, cheats, fraud, corruption, slander and libel by these odious people – with the aim of strengthening UKIP in the hands of its members liberated from the rotten head that has brought its into such disrepute.

We DESPERATELY need a patriotic party that will strenuously and with integrity, facts, probity and morality strive to liberate these United Kingdoms from the EU.

>His paymasters clearly do not have our interests at heart. ‘<

Again the idiotic Bannerman seeks to libel me by inference – However he is correct as I seek to destroy corruption, as so clearly represented by this sordid plant from the Tories now working for the EU.

>Best wishes, David CB<

(Do YOU think this stands for Corrupt Bastard or Conservative Bufoon?)

To continue – http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FWi43FxW1hY may prove interesting as an example of corruption in EUkip and during the recent scam orchestrated by the leadership of EUkip to put in place their chosen cronies – Farage is firmly on record making it clear he cares not a jot what the lists state he will draw up lists to suit him in April – what Bannerman is just a seat warmer for someone Farage wishes to parachute in – someone like the turncoat Tory Bob Spink?

Then of course he is in a position to parachute in the foul mouthed Fuller as a reward for her lies and duplicity and other services – he may even find he is blackmailed into giving the odious liar and supporter of extremism Mark Croucher as number one in Deadweight Derek’s fiefdom or the walking waistcoat, assuming he has his marital affairs sorted out, as a replacement for Colman who I note is already being spun against on the grounds of racism!!!

Bit rich coming from some of EUkip’s leadership!You will be aware I have a great deal of material from EUkip offices in the EU and elsewhere pertaining to the series of Kangaroo Courts planned to remove those who wish to clean up EUkip and who are insisting on financial probity and the removal of those who have so obviously brought EUkip into disrepute.

Although EUkip is wriggling on the hoof (to mix a few metaphors!) and at the moment are TRYING to deny basic Justice and refuse the selected victims the right to defend themselves against the trumped up charges – should they obstruct the fundamental standards of decent behaviour on a balanced and fair basis clearly those who are being dishonestly victimised will have every right to clear their names and acquit their duties to the electorate and those who voted for them in the public arena – including the courts.

Let us see if EUkip NEC & Leadership who have participated in this immoral and disgracefull witch hunt, seemingly to ensure they can keep their interests and calumnies concealed should unreservedly apologise for the shameful behaviour and also those who instigated this corruption including Farage as leader, Bannerman as deputy leader, Zucherman as Party Chairman who is acting shamefully as a licensed solicitor!

Denny who has repeatedly lied, cheated and acted corruptly on public forums and elsewhere, Oxley for her malicious behaviour and dishonest representation of her legal opinion as informed! Clark for his betrayal of Britain and admitted frauds against the EU – then we can start, once these people have resigned, to clean up the remainder of the party with the help of OLAF, The Police, The Electoral Commission and put UKIP back on track as an organisation that is fit for people of integrity to vote for.

I shall, in the interests of restoring UKIP withhold the documents to hand to provide EUkip with an opportunity to undertake to commence the clean up themselves – however I reserve the right to act in any manner I believe will best serve my Country and the decent honest grass roots members who have had their party stolen by self seekers, self enrichers, spivs, petty crooks, liars and worse!

EUkip has until 17:00hrs. Friday 31st. October to publicly and unreservedly apologise to myself, John West, Del Young, Simon Muir, Richard Suchorzewski, Petrina Holdsworth, David Abbott, Niall Warry, Dr. Richard North, Ian Gilman, Peter Watson, Robin Page, Daniel Foggo, The Sunday Telegraph, The Sunday Times, Dr. Eric Edmond and others whom they have defamed, lied about, slandered and libelled – Further an undertaking will be made to appoint The Returning Officer Piers Merchant to conduct a full, fair and externally organised rerun of the application, selection and vote for MEP candidates – the NEC/Leadership will undertake as recompense of their collusion in the corruption to date to fully fund this process from their own pockets – those unwilling to co-operate in this first step to make UKIP electable shall resign such offices they hold recuse themselves from all future political activity save voting and surrender their office and their membership back to the new UKIP within 7 days.

I note there has been much talk of EUkip’s leadership moving to a night of the long knives – You ain’t seen nothing yet! If they insist let their political blood be spilt to ensure rebirth. I will not withdraw from this battle for my Country nor give ANY quarter once the battle commences – the choice is entirely that of EUkip whether to continue in corruption or commence the clean up.

The names of ALL who have been besmirched by the filth that has risen in EUkip WILL be cleared and various resignations are a given – let us see if EUkip gets the message in time.I will meet with any member of the Party on any public platform to accept their apologies and their plans to clean up the party and restore it to the members – I will meet with any group publicly to debate the clean up of UKIP or destruction of EUkip.

The choice is entirely yours. This may well not be pretty but already we have a small but growing army of activists in place ready to campaign directly against EUkip during the elections and we have briefed media contacts who understand our position our actions are predicated on whether the leadership acts with integrity or continues in indisputable corruption – if the latter the exposures will be relentless and the corrupt will be harried on a daily basis, clearly we are aided by the Courts, the Police, The EU, the Electoral Commission and various other authorities.

Clearly we have unexpected sources on the NEC, over many years, leaks amongst staff, media and trusted members – people who appreciate that UKIP is finished and are VERY angry at seeing their efforts exploited and their Country betrayed.

May I ask ALL honest members of what was UKIP to circulate this as widely as they can and do all they can to clean up EUkip and restore it to the members and the peoples of Britain fit to elect – minded that the most recent poll showed that 95% of 10,000 people polled wished Britain to LEAVE the EU yet under its present leadership the membership has fallen the activists have collapsed and the support in elections varies between 1 & 3% as a norm save one freak vote when only 2 parties stood!Help US to get Britain OUT of the EU and ensure British people make rules for British people, pay taxes to fund Britain and control their own borders.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

Posted in Bannerman, Colman, CROUCHER, Derek CLARK, Dr. Eric Edmond, EUkip, Farage, Gollom, Gulleford, John WEST, Reeve, TITFORD, Tom WISE, UKIP | 1 Comment »

Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

For The Website Authors

The 20 most RECENT POSTS

POSTS & Comments SO FAR!

Archives

Categories

GOOGLE TRANSLATE

Follow me on Twitter

TWITTER N.I.Bs.

PAGES:

Just Say NO to EU

FleXit A WAY FORWARD

HoC – EU Exit Plan

EU_Referendum.com

JUNIUS On UKIP

REFERENDUM & How To Win!

Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Contact YOUR Political Servants

GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

Flying Spaghetti Monster

The EU In A Nutshell

The EUropean PARLIAMENT

The European Union

GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

The GREAT DECEPTION

The MANY NOT THE FEW

MINISTRY of DEFEAT

The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

SCARED to DEATH

Ten Years on

VIGILANCE

Voodoo Histories

WATERMELONS

Blogroll

Archive for the ‘TITFORD’ Category

#0086* – INTERIM LEADER TITFORD NO SURPRISE save IN ITS CRASSNESS!

Share this:

Like this:

#123* – EUkip Before The Courts AGAIN!

Share this:

Like this:

#114* – Gollom’s lost his Pressssiousssss!

Share this:

Like this:

#112* – Eastern Region Rises Against Corruption of EUkip Leadership It Seems!

Share this:

Like this:

#100* – Saturday 1st. Brings More EUkip Lies!!

Share this:

Like this: