Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • August 2009
    M T W T F S S
    « Jul   Sep »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Archive for August, 2009

#606* – DID FARAGE LIE TO THE BBC AGAIN?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 31/08/2009

#606* – DID FARAGE LIE TO THE BBC AGAIN?

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

DID FARAGE LIE TO THE BBC AGAIN? IT DOES SEEM SO!

Hi,

as ever I found myself listening to the Westminster Hour yesterday (Sunday 30-Aug-2009) on BBC Radio 4 – a programme that can be listened to on iPod or whatever on the BBC web site for a week if you CLICK HERE

Yes I know that The Westminster Hour is largely garbage – sort of ‘The Westminster Bubble does The Archers’ as a friend of mine described it – yes it is light weight and far from consequential, but that is surely no excuse for the so called leader of a political party to lie outright.

For more details CLICK HERE

It does look very much as if Farage’s contribution to The NO Campaign is very similar to that of Declan Ganley and for much the same reasons I expect – for details CLICK HERE

It is sad to see this level of self interest and disloyal dishonesty, from those seeking self enrichment on the EU Gravy Train, when there are only 27 campaigning days left to help Ireland maintain its liberty and even the slightest vestages of democracy!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU
&
GET OUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Farage; Dishonesty; Westminster Hour; Lies; | Leave a Comment »

#605* – IN SUPPORT of UKIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/08/2009

#605* – IN SUPPORT of UKIP

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

IN SUPPORT of UKIP AN EXPOSE of THE VILE DESTRUCTION DONE TO UKIP, PATRIOTISM, EUroScepticism & THESE UNITED KINGDOMS by EUkip!

A Reprint From Dr. Eric Edmond’s Blog:

“Pro UKIP, anti Farage’s EUKIP”

I wholeheartedly support UKIP’s core policy of withdrawal from the EU and negotiation of a Swiss type free trade agreement with Europe and Brussels. My problem is the current UKIP leadership seems to have no strategy to achieve these aims. Sitting on EU committees in Brussels does not further our policy aims. Indeed it is positively working against UKIP policy! This has to stop and the current leadership has to go and go quickly to stop it. Otherwise our cause is lost for my lifetime.

The current most effective advocate of our policy is Daniel Hannan, the Tory MEP. He has written another very effectice piece in today’s Telegraph entitled,

“There is no harm in agreeing to disagree”
(to view the article CLICK HERE)

Cick on the title to read the full article. Hannan is still trying to get the Lisbon Treaty vote reversed, something the Farage UKIP Cabal gave up months ago to concentrate on their number one priority, getting on the EU gravy train.

Hannan is an outstanding politician, well educated, thoughtful and articulate. His latest YouTube interview done in the US market can be seen by clicking on the link below,

To View Hannan’s Latest YouTube Interview

Its beautifully crafted for the US market and rooted deep in Anglo Saxon democratic traditions embodied and articulated by Thomas Jefferson, the third US president and principal author of the US Declaration of Independence. It is a must watch piece, far more so than his attack on Brown.

Most significantly Hannan talks of how the Internet breaks the stranglehold of the leftist media if used correctly by a skilled, well educated exponent. He calls this disintermediation. Sadly, UKIP had such people but they have all left, appalled by the actions and selfishness of the UKIP ruling Cabal or been forced out by Farage. Farage and his Cabal are simply not in Hannan’s league, intellectually, morally or in media skills but worse they deny the floor to those that are.

Getting 13 MEPs does not move us one step closer to getting out of the EU. It entrenches us deeper in the mire. Even if UKIP had 70 + MEPs the result would be the same and we would be even further embedded in the EU. The money such as it is remains largely in the MEP’s own pockets and frankly money is useless without a plan on how to use it to achieve one’s policy goals.

We need a new leadership and a new strategy. We need it soon and we need it in the UK. Let those who support the EU go to Brussels where they can be seen for the collaborators they are.
posted by Eric Edmond at 01:40 on 28-Aug-2009

Junius said…

Another excellent article from Dr Edmond.

UKIP under Farage is not worth a single vote. But let us not forget that if we get rid of Farage we could end up with Bannerman or Nuttall as leader!

The whole lot must go or UKIP will be forever tainted by corruption and dishonesty.

28 August 2009 11:00

Greg L-W. said…

Hi,

as a long term supporter of UKIP and a lifetime opponent of racism, bullying and corruption I aplaud your article.

It will be noted that I have without fails for a dozen years or more supported UKIP and made unreserved attack on individuals, politicians and organisations which are a part of the EU or espouse its further progress.

When it became clear to me with a great deal of inside knowledge and contacts, after many years of assistance to UKIP, that there was within UKIP a self serving, self interested, self important clique and claque best known as EUkip.

EUkip has done much harm to UKIP and would seem now to be all who derive income or status from their relationship with the EU. EUkip’s leadership is seen by the reasearchers, translators, MEPs and others working in and on the EU project as no more than a part of the establishment project.

To be true they are seen as one of the more risible aspects of the EU and command absolutely no respect whether from those espousing or opposing the central projects of the EU.

EUkip has now gathered around it some of the most unpleasant racists, xenophobes,sexually intollerant advocates of ethnic cleansing and the slaughter of imigrants – presumably the politicians most like them as they permit them through ‘job sharing’ or more accurately ‘job sharing out’ to represent EUkip and thus Britain on some committees whilst EUkip members represent them on their committees.

I would contend that it is sloppy writing to use UKIP as a definition when talking of the MEPs, staff, leadership and their unpleasant supporters – they are accurately defined as EUkip, having largely gone ‘native’.

The bribes, largesse and status available to those participating in the EU project are clear and generous such that one can not be surprised when they turn the loyalties of the weak and those without ethics, morality and integrity – those who would be happy to ‘Go Native’.

UKIP is without leadership and EUkip has befouled the reputation of EUroScepticism and its most stalwart wing namely UKIP.

I most dedicatedly and relentlessly support EUroRealism, EUroScepticism & UKIP as a non racist, non xenophobic, sexually tollerant, caring, largely libertarian, patriotic group with no willingness whatsoever to remain a member of The EU – having myself rather larger horizons for my Country than the introspective, corrupt, navel gazing, communist styled, centralised and undemocratic EU – looking to a Britain of independence and values negotiating, trading and leading on a global basis with and through our natural alies and in their interest – The Commonwealth and The Anglosphere.

We are a global trading nation NOT the servants and lakeys of France & Germany (see Treaty of Elysee CLICK HERE). Westminster is and has been our law maker for 1,000 years and so it should remain, not a rubber stamping office as an extention of the bureacracy of the behemoth of EUrope no longer answerable to the people or Britain (see: CLICK HERE)

Regards,
Greg L-W.

29 August 2009 07:21

IN ADDITION:

It is well worth studying in some detail those who are most willing to betray their Country within and on the periffery of EUkip by attacking or seeking to undermine both organisations and individuals who relentlesly seek to defend these United Kingdoms, act Patriotically, oppose racism, xenophobia and corruption and take a tollerant stance on issues of legal perversions.

Individuals opposing membership of The EU and upholding the principles of UKIP whilst upholding a relentless determination to work for peace and withdrawal from The EU are all too often attacked by those in EUkip who see their personal incomes and status having ‘Gone Native’ feweding from the Troughs of The EU or merely riding on The Gravy Train.

You will note how relentlessly individuals like Niall Warry, Dr. David Abbott, Geoffrey Collier, John West, Richard Suchorzewski, Dr. Eric Edmond, Alistair McConnachie, Dr. Richard North, Robin Page, Junius and myself are attacked and by whom – virtually without exception it is by those seeking to protect their EU income or status. On occasion there will be amongst such treacherous low lifes those making attacks directly of course, who are acting dishonourably for personal self enrichment, but consider the broader spectrum!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU
&
GET BRITAIN BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Edmond; Junius; Corruption; Gone Native; | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST: Steve Morson on BBC Bias & TV Licence Tax

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/08/2009

>GUEST POST: Steve Morson on BBC Bias & TV Licence Tax
.
 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

>GUEST POST:

Steve Morson writes in complaint to Sir Micheal Lyons Chairman of The BBC Trust in some detail concerning BBC Bias & TV Licence Tax

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
Hi,

minded that Steve Morson was a UKip prospective parliamentary candidate for Bromsgrove

MORSON, Steve 01

where the disgraced Julie Kirkbride was MP (well one of the homes she claimed expenses for!) this complaint written to Sir Michael Lyons in his capacity as Chairman of The BBC Trust, covers many of our feelings regarding the debased, befouled and biased BBC!

I strongly advise those of you with an interest in the future well being of these United kingdoms read it to the end!

Sir Michael Lyons
Chairman
BBC Trust
Broadcasting House
London
W1A 1AA

29th August 2009

Dear Sir Michael,

With immediate effect, I am withholding my television licence fee, and as I intend to encourage many more people to do the same, I think it is rather important that you know why.

I realise that a single licence fee of £142.50 is a ‘drop in the ocean’ compared to the £3.36 billion annual income from this state-enforced licence tax, and a fraction of a percentage point of the obscene £141 million in loans from the European Investment Bank (EIB), but I feel that it will become a story in it’s own right. I have joined the Facebook group “10 Million for No TV Licence”, which at the time of writing, has 537,400 members.

I doubt that you will be surprised to learn that I am a member and prospective parliamentary candidate (PPC) of the U.K. Independence Party (UKIP). I intend to campaign within my party to introduce the proposition that our party adopts the abolition of the TV licence tax as policy in its Culture, Media and Sport portfolio.

My letters of complaint through the BBC’s normal channels, plus those of my friends and colleagues, have become an object lesson in futility, which is why several of us have taken this step. In many cases, the responses of the BBC are shared amongst the wider membership – more for ridicule than illumination – and are held as examples of anfractuous reasoning and needless digressions. Please note that I do not expect a point-by-point refutation of this letter, as some or all of the points will already have been inadequately answered by your Complaints Department. The request I am making is for a fundamental shift in the practice of political broadcasting, including conformity with legislation, guidelines and commissioned reports, and the basic concept of fairness.

My grievances

In my opinion, the BBC has, throughout both election periods stipulated below:

1)

Broken its covenant to “educate, inform and entertain” its audience. Virtually all of the output of all television channels has been aptly described by Peter Hitchens as “mental slurry”, and the BBC is as guilty as anyone of producing it

2)

Failed to provide adequate coverage or at least reflect the political views of people and interested parties in anything other than the three main political parties, i.e. Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat

3)

Treated the United Kingdom Independence Party as a single-issue, extremist party and never once asked them to explain or discuss their range of policies that have been in place for more than a year in the context of a serious discussion (I exclude the bromidic BBC 1 “Question Time” programme)

4)

Failed to take the concerns of many UKIP supporters over the accusations of unfair coverage in these election periods seriously

5)

Failed to follow its own “Editorial Guidelines (Politics and Public Policy) – Broadcasting during elections”, viz: “…news judgements at election time are made within a framework of democratic debate [your bold emphasis] which ensures that due weight is given to hearing the views and examining and challenging the policies of all parties. Significant minor parties should also receive some network coverage during the campaign.”

6)

By dint of points 2), 3) and 5), potentially and possibly interfered with, or at least attempted to affect, the outcome of two elections in contravention of its charter and UK laws

7)

Wilfully failed to observe Bridcut Principles 1 to 5 (listed in Appendix A), failed to provide Principle 8, and seemingly couldn’t care about 11 or 12.

8)

Underestimated the public need for radical change at the very heart of our political institutions, especially the House of Commons, by stifling all but mainstream opinion, and failed to reflect this view in a cross-party consensus

9)

Committed a breach of section 5.5. (and possibly others) of The Ofcom Broadcasting Code (Oct. 2008), viz:

“Due impartiality on matters of political or industrial controversy and matters relating to current public policy must be preserved on the part of any person providing a service (listed above). This may be achieved within a programme or over a series of programmes taken as a whole.”

10)

Continued it’s trashing of the image and reputation of our Royal family and its place in the affections of many British people and our state’s constitution, by persistent and unchallenged trivialisation, negative reporting and imagery, and denigration through BBC radio and TV “comedy” output. As a case in point, a ‘brand new comedy series’ on BBC Radio 4 on 21st August at 6:30 pm aimed at mocking the weeks headlines started in the first episode with a non-story from the Times turned into a ‘joke’ at the expense of Prince Edward, within two minutes of starting.

The straw that ‘broke the camels back’ for me was the by-election in Norwich North on 23rd July. I drove to Norwich to volunteer in Glenn Tingle’s campaign, and saw first hand the disgraceful media bias our candidate had to tolerate. This was only part of a profound and unsubtle anti-UKIP broadcasting policy by television and radio programming to deny a voice to a legitimate and respectable party – the fourth largest in UK politics, and second largest in European politics. The BBC actively promoted the Green Party as an alternative to the two main parties, without even mentioning UKIP on several occasions in its reportage.

4th June elections

In the approaching weeks to the June 4th County Council and European Parliament elections, I noticed the following transgressions:-

1.

Watching repeats of “Have I Got News For You” reminded me how, whenever UKIP is mentioned, it is merely for cheap ridicule and unfailingly we are represented by Robert Kilroy-Silk. The fact that he left the party in January 2005 doesn’t seem to trouble the programme makers or the BBC commissioning / editorial staff.

2.

On 8th May this year on Radio 4’s Today programme, after listening, I felt compelled to e-mail this complaint:-

This morning, Nigel Farage MEP was interviewed by James Naughtie. Throughout the interview, he constantly shuffled papers, and on my stereo, it sounded so close to the microphone that it almost drowned Mr. Farage out.

This is not the first time; far from it. He seems to make a habit of doing this when his vocal intonation betrays the fact that he feels dislike / derision for the subject of his interview.

Please ask him to desist.

The reply (typical of its kind) included this utter irrelevance:

James is an extremely experienced and well respected presenter…

A view not shared by me or the blogosphere apparently.

3.

In the 10:00 pm news on BBC 1 on or around 11th May, Nick Robinson –the BBC’s so-called Political Editor, was delivering a live piece to Huw Edwards in the studio from Westminster, about the MPs expenses scandal and its possible effects on the coming 4th June poll. He included this:-

…and when people are asked about how they might vote in the European elections, Labour is neck-and-neck at 19% with the U.K. Independence Party. A huge surge of support for them, that despite the fact that one of the MEPs they elected last time is currently in prison for being on benefit fraud [sic]. He was, I ought to say, expelled from the party.

This was clearly a reference to Ashley Mote, MEP. As many UKIP officials were tired of explaining even by then, Mote withheld vital information (a pending civil court case for housing benefit fraud) from the Party when he applied to us for candidature. This would have precluded him standing for any office in the party, much less a parliamentary seat. Ashley Mote was released from jail in November 2007 from his subsequent conviction, eighteen months before Mr. Robinson’s report. Nick Robinson was either wilfully and artfully propagandist, or woefully incompetent and outdated with his ‘facts’. In either case, is he a suitable journalist to hold the BBC’s most senior political reporting post, or was he merely ensuring that facts didn’t get in the way of a “good story”? Or obeying orders?

4.

In BBC1’s Question Time in May, a woman asked if the MP expenses scandal would give a boost to “….extremist parties like the BNP?” David Dimbleby asked her “By extremist, do you also mean UKIP?” Why? By whose criteria (apart from Dimbleby’s) is UKIP considered “extremist”?

5.

On 21st May edition of the same programme (from Salisbury), the normal complement of five ‘talking heads’ was bizarrely increased by the presence of Yasmin Alibi-Brown, the BBC’s favourite and ubiquitous rent-a-Leftie (and habitual interrupter), ensuring that Marta Andreasen’s contribution – as UKIP Treasurer – was kept to an absolute minimum.

6.

In Michael Ball’s Radio 2 programme on a Sunday morning before 4th June, Peter Riddell of The Times was the guest reviewer of the Sunday newspapers. I have admired Peter’s insights, analysis and writing for many years until, when discussing MPs expenses and the 4th June, he stated that ‘this will give a boost to “….extremist parties like the BNP and UKIP”…’

7.

On 3rd June, UKIP Leader Nigel Farage was interviewed by Emily Maitlis for BBC 2 Newsnight. It was shameful; hostile questioning is expected, but constant interruptions are not.

8.

On polling day – 4th June – there was virtually no coverage of the story behind multiple cases of an attempt at electoral fraud by councils up and down the country who issued ballot papers folded to obscure the UKIP box at the bottom of the paper. Nigel Farage threatened to demand a rerun of the European elections and demanded the resignation of Elections Minister Michael Wills because of fears that our party had lost votes as its name fell below the crease – machine formed in many cases – of the folded ballot paper. The Electoral Commission had to issue urgent advice to polling stations and returning officers to hand out unfolded ballot papers to voters. I heard nothing in the BBC news of this. The BNP claim that they picked up many votes this way that would otherwise have gone to us.

Post election

After 4th June elections, I noticed the following:

1.

In the BBC 1 Question Time programme on 11th June, UKIP was not mentioned once; not by the panel or the audience. For a programme that seeks to explore and discuss the week’s politics and current events, this is far more than extraordinary or coincidental. Presumably, this programme is recorded and then edited for broadcast, so only one of two scenarios is possible in this case; either a) no-one in that studio mentioned UKIP even once, or b) it was mentioned and then edited out. In the case of (a), this would be remarkable, as not only did UKIP poll second place in the European parliament elections, but were the only political party to increase their vote share on 2004 results. Surely someone would have raised this point? In addition, UKIP won several County Council seats, Labour no longer controlled a single county council in England and the Liberal Democrats reduced to one. Labour lost three quarters of their councillors in England and resulted with less than the Lib Dems. How could UKIP not have been mentioned?

2.

However, if point 1) seems odd, what is absolutely peculiar is that Question Time was followed – as usual – by “This Week”, but we fared no better. If there was a place for discussion and deep political analysis, it was here (I was a regular viewer). The only time UKIP was mentioned was by Diane Abbott MP, but it was dismissive and in passing. That Andrew Neil did not mention UKIP is just unfathomable!

3.

In the early hours of Monday 8th June as European ballot results were declared, Mike Nattrass MEP stated in his speech that he asked the BBC for a debate on the Lisbon Treaty with the Conservatives and other party representatives. Why was this cut from the edited highlights of his speech in the news?

4.

Nikki Sinclaire, who was elected as an MEP for the West Midlands, was invited on to BBC1’s The Politics Show of 14th June for the West Midlands and an interview by Sarah Falkland. Before this, on the national segment, Ken Clarke, Conservative MP was interviewed live about public spending, debt, the NHS and Royal Mail. Ms. Sinclaire was prevented from seeing any monitors in her time in the studio, so it is perhaps just as well that she wasn’t questioned on his responses to Jon Sopel’s questions.

5.

In an appallingly biased West Midlands segment on this programme, Susana Mendonça preceded an interview with “one of our regular commentators” – Prof. Mick Temple of Stafford University – with the fact that in the West Midlands, UKIP’s increase in vote share was the highest in the country. He said:

“I think UKIP have been very [his emphasis] lucky. Their performance has not been brilliant, they are themselves plagued by expenses scandals, and yet they picked up and extra seat in the West Midlands which quite frankly I don’t think they deserved! I think those Conservative voters who voted UKIP are going to come back to the Conservatives in a general election, but this is not a clear indication that the Conservatives will win the next general election; on the votes cast in the European and local elections, they’ll be lucky to scrape a working majority. That’s not good enough a year before an election.”

It is a political tenet of our age that many habitual voters of the three main parties vote UKIP in a European election because they trust us – almost more – than anyone else. This was mentioned to me, unprompted, by Conservatives at the county and European vote counts, even by Ms. Julie Kirkbride – my MP. It seems to be a revelation to Prof. Temple, who seems to be a professor of food science judging by these sour grapes and rotten tomatoes!

‘Deserved’? Why was no-one invited to offer a response to counter this ignorant nonsense, especially as Nikki Sinclaire MEP was sitting in the studio? If Mr. Temple had been on the campaign trail with UKIP activists in the region, he would have seen first-hand the enormous amount of hard work and personal investment made by ordinary people committed to bringing decent, honest change to British and European politics. It was rewarded in the vote share.

“A working majority”? Since the end of last year, polls have put the Conservatives at a minimum of 9%, and mostly this year in the 13 – 19% range, ahead of Labour. This by any measure would ensure a very healthy majority for the governing party.

Moreover, to which “expenses scandals” was he referring? Ashley Mote, as explained, was effectively nothing to do with UKIP, and Tom Wise is awaiting trial on such charges. Unless, like everyone else at the BBC and everyone they interview, he is presciently convinced of Mr. Wise’ guilt. Perhaps I’m alone in thinking it strange that I have never once heard mention on the BBC that the Conservative’s Chief Whip in the European parliament, Den Dover, was required to pay back £445,000 in “unaccountable expenditure”.

This same segment then went on to interview Michael Cashman, now the lone Labour MEP in the West Midlands. He said:

“UKIP as I said earlier, it’s a protest vote. They stand for one thing – pulling out. They were given an easy ride….the denunciation of all of the mainstream parties lifted UKIP and sadly, in other regions, gave oxygen and breath and support to the British National Party.”

More bilge. As I have pointed out in previous correspondence with your Complaints Department and on many weblog pages, if you starve UKIP of the oxygen of publicity, you may end up with some curious and undesirable election results. We were positively asphyxiated by the BBC, and lo and behold, Nick Griffin – BNP Leader – won an MEP seat in the North West.

(Every member of UKIP I have met detests the BNP as much as I, a fact of which I am immensely proud.) If UKIP had polled 17,000 more votes in that region, we would have taken that seat. I have heard people espouse the theory that effectively, the BBC actively campaigned for this BNP victory. Whatever anyone thinks of UKIP – propagandising and prejudices aside, we are nothing like the BNP; I speak as a three-year member. I also never tire of pointing out that in the 1980’s, the voices of Sinn Fein’s political leaders were dubbed by actors to – in theory – deny the IRA the ‘oxygen of publicity’. But at least their words got out.

Just as I thought this programme had cornered the market in ill-thought out nonsense and anti-UKIP propaganda with the previous two contributions, Susana Mendonça introduces an interview with Liz Lynne, Liberal Democrat MEP with this line:

“ …the fourth placed Liberal Democrats, who keep their one MEP in the region, warn that UKIP’s success is bad news for the Midlands.”

Liz Lynne MEP said:

“If you don’t get MEPs going in there to work, then they can’t stand up for their constituents so I hope they will change their mind. I hope they will engage with the whole process to make sure we have more jobs coming into this region, more funding coming into this region. That is what the job of an MEP is.

I don’t think Mike Nattrass MEP needs to be reminded of that, as he is the only person – anywhere – to tell us that in October last year, the EU parliament approved a €97 million subsidy for bullfighting (after we banned foxhunting), and a €305 million subsidy for growing some of the most carcinogenic tobacco known to man (after we banned smoking in public places). He also tells us of lost contracts due to EU Legislation (e.g. for British trucks that went to Austria instead of LDV in his constituency – sealing their fate) and exorbitant conformity on-costs, the chicanery of the EU Budget, the obscenity of the Common Agricultural Policy, a collapsing parliament roof (Strasbourg – which could have killed 300 people if the EU parliament was sitting), and police assaults on legitimate protestors. He also warned us that the British and French were attempting to set up an EU Navy – to the alarm of British admirals. UKIP’s MEPs carry out sterling work, making sure that the unsustainable lunacy of the European Project is exposed, while MEPs of other parties slavishly toe the line and spuriously defend our membership.

How exactly was Liz Lynne describing “bad news” for ‘the Midlands’? East and West? Why does she think that they will do no work? Judging by results, Mike Nattrass works far harder at being an MEP than the others from whom I‘ve heard nothing. Whatsoever. (By the way, in a recent survey of the most effective MEPs in the European Parliament conducted by the Taxpayers Alliance, a UKIP MEP was rated 7th of 783 in a league table of effectiveness, with seven Labour MEPs – including Michael Cashman – in the bottom ten. And yet here he was berating UKIP.

Later in the national segment, Ken Clarke was again interviewed, this time on the Irish referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Again, this was unchallenged, even though Mr. Clarke is a passionate Europhile who is utterly opposed to any referendum by any government on any issue. This despite a poll on ConservativeHome weblog showing that 84% of Conservative party members want a British referendum on the Lisbon Treaty even if it is ratified by all member states.

In all, an utterly disgraceful programme.

Norwich North

In the campaign up to the Norwich North by-election of 23rd July, I noticed the following:

1)

Throughout BBC news coverage on TV and radio, several activists including myself, who had arrived from various parts of the country to help Glenn Tingle’s campaign, noticed that the only party mentioned other than the three main parties was the Green Party.

2)

On BBC 2 Newsnight on Wednesday 15th July in a segment centred in Norwich, interviews were conducted with the three main party candidates. This was followed by an interview with someone from Pitman Training in Norwich. Then, UKIP candidate Glenn Tingle was

given a few seconds, but in a resulting montage graphic of four squares, what was shown? Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat candidates… and a classroom at Pitman Training! We assumed they also had a candidate in the election!

3)

In the same programme, a BBC News East reporter went to a home for elderly people in Norwich, and interviewed four ladies. When he asked them who they would vote for, they said “Not the Conservatives or Labour!” (A moment’s silence). “The Greens?” asked the reporter! “Yes, the Greens. We think!” came the reply.

4)

Whose decision was it to exclude Glenn Tingle, UKIP candidate, from a televised hustings programme only days before the election?

5)

On the evening before my departure, I was told of the existence of a memorandum that was sent from senior BBC management in London to news chiefs at BBC East HQ in Norwich, to the effect that ‘the Green party were to be treated as the fourth party in the by-election coverage, and that UKIP was to be treated the same as the BNP’. Does (or did) such a memo exist, if so who originated this policy, who wrote it, to whom was it sent, who oversaw its compliance, and what do you intend to do about this gross breach of the BBC Charter? The bias we had seen in preceding days certainly seems to confirm its existence.

6)

In an web article entitled “Five key lessons from Norwich North” (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8167588.stm), BBC Chief Political Correspondent James Landale writes:

“Third, the anti-politics, anti-politician, expenses-fuelled vote did not coalesce around any particular party or candidate. The Greens, UKIP and the former diplomat Craig Murray picked up some expenses-driven protest votes but not enough to matter.”

Really? At 4,068 votes, this was UKIP’s strongest ever showing in a parliamentary election (which barely did credit to an excellent candidate), but less than 800 votes behind the Liberal Democrats. With fair media coverage, who knows what could have been achieved? The BBC’s much-touted and fancied Green Party came fifth. James Landale appears to reflect – accurately – the BBC view of the British political spectrum.

Bias

For the purpose of brevity, I’ve avoided traversing the minefield that is BBC radio “comedy”. It is an odd experience to hear an audience laughing when nothing funny had been said, but I am getting used to Marcus Brigstocke (and the 6:30pm Radio 4 slot) by now. I doubt I’ll ever get used to Sue Perkins who recently said: “UKIP. Tossers!” bizarrely out of context in a programme as unmemorable as it was un-entertaining.

In an article written for the Daily Telegraph on 24th July entitled “Anti-UKIP and pro-Green: the BBC at its most blatantly biased”, Daniel Hannan, a Conservative MEP wrote:

Throughout the campaign, it ran programmes with Conservative, Labour, LibDem and Green spokesmen…. But there was no basis to the claim that they were the fourth party, either nationally or locally. The last test of electoral feeling was June’s European election. The United Kingdom Independence Party won 13 seats and came second; the Greens won two seats and came fifth. In local elections on the same day, UKIP beat the Greens in most Norwich North wards.

He continued:

Newsnight, Look East and Radio 4 all chose to disregard UKIP and treat the Greens as the main story. Three days before the poll, the BBC’s Eastern region TV held a hustings meeting for four candidates: Conservative, Labour, LibDem and Green.

What was the result in the event? UKIP won 11.8 per cent of the vote ‐ comfortably ahead of the Greens and remarkably close to the LibDems (or “worryingly close” as I just heard a Radio 5 Live presenter put it).

One of the responses to Mr. Hannan’s blog (by ‘Patrick’) was this: On the Saturday before the Euro elections, Today ran a five minute attack on UKIP written by Mark Mardell, the BBC Europe editor. It was a total hatchet job with Mardell first telling us what the other parties in Brussels thought of UKIP (they did not like it) and then giving us his own opinion ‐ that UKIP were profoundly unserious golf club militants who had not been made prefects when they were at school.

I am not really a UKIP supporter, since I am rather to their left (although I did vote for them in protest after hearing that), but I made a formal complaint which was just brushed off.

The BBC’s Europe Editor should not tell us his negative opinions of any party in the days before an election ‐ so I am very pleased that Daniel Hannan as a conservative is making this post. A complaint from him to the BBC Trust, about the treatment of a party which he opposes, would carry a lot of weight. The BBC can just ignore the ordinary licence payer.

Like many people in UKIP, I constantly wonder if the soft loans from the EIB have had an effect on output. Although the BBC refuted the suggestion that there would be any effect on the editorial process at the time, one of the conditions of EIB loans is that the aims of the E.U. are promoted and furthered. I, for one, am bewildered as to why an organisation such as the BBC that raises £3.36 billion annually, with almost guaranteed supra-inflationary increases by state-mandated taxation, needs to borrow £141 million from such a source that places its editorial integrity under question. Looking at the quality of BBC output, I am mystified as to where it is spent.

Or is the BBC simply taking orders from 10, Downing Street? To expose the European Union for the fraudulent, inept, overweening, corrupt and devious mess that we think it is might set the British people to question why we are a member of such an organisation, its second largest funder, and cause people to actually question what has been done in their name and with their money but without their electoral mandate.

Conclusion

I turn to the Bridcut Report, “From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel”. It contains Twelve Guiding Principles to ensure impartiality, which I have reproduced in Appendix A. The BBC Trust webpage states the following:

The report is the result of a project first commissioned by the BBC Board of Governors in conjunction with BBC management in November 2005 to identify the challenges and risks to impartiality. The report has been fully endorsed by the BBC Trust, the BBC Executive Board and the BBC Journalism Board.

Endorsed it may have been, although this carries little significant meaning. It is a great shame that it was not ‘embraced’, or even adopted.

As much to blame for this situation are spineless and devious politicians. BBC funding appears to be a ‘third rail’ in British politics – ‘touch it and you die’, but this should not prevent the issue from being addressed. An iniquitous system such as the licence tax cannot be maintained, and this has been stated by commissioned reports, astute and intelligent individuals, and even James Murdoch at the recent McTaggart Lecture in the Edinburgh Television Festival.

Now that I have fully realised that I cannot trust BBC output on news and political coverage, I am reduced to watching one hour of television per week. It is a BBC programme – Dragon’s Den – a fascinating programme which is available on BBC iPlayer, obviating the need for a television. My views, in common with millions of people in this country, are not represented, so why should I pay the BBC licence tax? A programme that I always thought I would like to see made would be a ‘PPC’s only’ version of BBC1’s Question Time for the four main parties, with each party HQ providing a parliamentary candidate of their choice, just before the general election. Given the way the BBC currently reports politics, with its policy of deliberate exclusion of UKIP I do not see this happening.

I intend to use every technological means to achieve the objective I have stated. I will change my mind and resume payment when I detect a sea-change in attitudes towards political coverage on the BBC and it becomes fair and balanced in proportion to a range of electoral results and more representative of reasoned public opinion. In the meantime, I believe a full, independent public enquiry should be launched into the BBC coverage on TV and radio of both election periods, to investigate my charge in point 5) in Grievance above; hence the distribution list below.

I personally believe that British politics is changing profoundly. The effects of the internet, blogging, scandals, and a detachment of the political and media classes from the mood and opinions of the public are coming to a head. Between the general elections of 2001 and 2005, the Labour Party lost 64% of its membership. The number of new members joining UKIP increased our total membership by13% ….between April and July this year.

Yours sincerely,

Steven W. Morson

Prospective parliamentary candidate

UKIP – Bromsgrove.

Appendix A

The Twelve Guiding Principles of the Bridcut report.

1. Impartiality is and should remain the hallmark of the BBC as the leading provider of information and entertainment in the United Kingdom, and as a pre-eminent broadcaster internationally. It is a legal requirement, but it should also be a source of pride.

2. Impartiality is an essential part of the BBC’s contract with its audience, which owns and funds the BBC. Because of that, the audience itself will often be a factor in determining impartiality.

3. Impartiality must continue to be applied to matters of party political or industrial controversy. But in today’s more diverse political, social and cultural landscape, it requires a wider and deeper application.

4. Impartiality involves breadth of view, and can be breached by omission. It is not necessarily to be found on the centre ground.

5. Impartiality is no excuse for insipid programming. It allows room for fair-minded, evidence-based judgments by senior journalists and documentary makers, and for controversial, passionate and polemical arguments by contributors and writers.

6. Impartiality applies across all BBC platforms and all types of programme. No genre is exempt. But the way it is applied and assessed will vary in different genres.

7. Impartiality is most obviously at risk in areas of sharp public controversy. But there is a less visible risk, demanding particular vigilance, when programmes purport to reflect a consensus for “the common good”, or become involved with campaigns.

8. Impartiality is often not easy. There is no template of wisdom which will eliminate fierce internal debate over difficult dilemmas. But the BBC’s journalistic expertise is an invaluable resource for all departments to draw on.

9. Impartiality can often be affected by the stance and experience of programme makers, who need constantly to examine and challenge their own assumptions.

10. Impartiality requires the BBC to examine its own institutional values, and to assess the effect they have on its audiences.

11. Impartiality is a process, about which the BBC should be honest and transparent with its audience: this should permit greater boldness in its programming decisions. But impartiality can never be fully achieved to everyone’s satisfaction: the BBC should not be defensive about this but ready to acknowledge and correct significant breaches as and when they occur.

12. Impartiality is required of everyone involved in output. It applies as much to the most junior researcher as it does to the director general. But editors and executive producers must give a strong lead to their teams. They must ensure that the impartiality process begins at the conception of a programme and lasts throughout production: if left until the approval stage, it is usually too late.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in BBC Trust, Sir Michael Lyons, Steve MORSON, Steven Morson, TV Licence Tax, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

#604* – ITS A WOPPER & STILL NO ONE BELIEVES THE LIES

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 28/08/2009

#604* – ITS A WOPPER & STILL NO ONE BELIEVES THE LIES

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

ITS A WOPPER & 2.1/2 YEARS ON NO ONE BELIEVES THE LIES IT SEEMS!

Hi,

It is now 2.1/2 years since Rob Watts wrote this article for the Sunday Telegraph and he has now moved on and is working for The Sunday Times.

It was originally stated at the public hustings for the Leadership Election in which the lies of people like Annabelle Fuller, Mark Croucher, David Lott, Douglas Denny, John Moran, Jim Carver and others of the low life of EUkip dishonesty corrupted the process, in the long term destroying UKIP as we have seen as it became dependent on the Westminster expenses publicity for a protest vote in The EU elections and has now alied itself with those like it to form a pan EU Political Party Group as some of the most revolting racist, xenophobic, sexually intollerant politicians since Eichman, Goebbels, Miterand & Barbie!

During those hustings David Bannerman, best known for his lies about his ancestry and cheating to get elected in the Eastern Region, he spoke out to add detail to a statement made by Richard Suchorzewski which he was well placed to make as Chairman of the party at that time.

Bannerman stated that the income to the party from the various activities at Ashford was more than 10% of that income nearer 15%.

Years later and 2.1/2 years since Rob’s article with trust in EUkip’s accounts rock bottom amongst a number of well informed individuals the subject of who trousered the money and howmuch they stole rages on.

Minded of the fact that the media have shown that the most meagre of MEPs can reasonably steal over £1Million from the tax payer whilst in office without breaking any laws and based on Farage’s claim in this article when measured against his Chairman at the time it would seem as if a very great deal of money has not only not reached the party but ‘gone missing’ or been used for private gain.

We are well aware that Andrew Smith as treasurer for this period not only left his post in haste abrogating on his duty when asked 28 simple accountancy questions relevant to the party accounts by The NEC but had clearly misled the Electoral Commission over donations such that the party found itself in Court and was found Guilty of electoral offences.

I do not believe I would be wrong in stating that EUkip has proved a hugely successful self enrichment scam for a small grouping – one need only read the press and study the details of Tom Wise to be very certain of this, he even boasts he has no idea of any job he is supposed to do for the ‘loads a dosh’ he trousers! Others are no doubt more duplicitous in hiding their activities but there is no denying that every MEP is in exactly the same position:

or


or to Read the fuller details CLICK HERE

& still now no plausible answers on the various activities at Ashford or running credit cards through a hotel’s account in the west country, nor the £250,000 of tax payers money given by the EU for a petition which never took place, nor accounts of public money showing over 50% of income as ‘other expenses’ etc. etc.

One notes the donations as listed by The Electoral Commission and the absences speak volumes whilst those who feel they have unsafe seats in the run up to an election would seem to feel investing part of their gains may buy a further round with their snouts in the trough of The EU – one of the greatest scams of the modern era for the talentless would seem to be to aid the EU as useful idiots acting as Massively Expensive Parasites – the MEP whose sole job is to act as a highly bribed sales rep for the EU, for one could NEVER claim the EARN their income other than in the betrayal of their fellow countrymen!

That EUkip lies as a party to try to silence its critics and has a small team of ‘terriers’ endlessly harrieing those seeking transparency and an end to the corruption.

Well I remember The Cray brothers who used to threaten people, even making efforts to corrupt the courts to intimidate on their behalf, they threatened and bullied through attacks on family and friends and efforts to bankrupt their opponents – so very like some of the behaviour of some in support of EUkip and retaining snouts in the feeding troughs on the EU Gravy Train.

Ukip donations ‘failing to get to party HQ’

By Robert Watts
Published: 12:01AM GMT 18 Feb 2007

Ukip’s Nigel Farage: ‘No money has disappeared’
Hundreds of thousands of pounds donated to the UK Independence Party has failed to find its way into the party’s central accounts, a senior Ukip official has confirmed.

David Campbell-Bannerman, the party’s deputy leader, has said that only 15 per cent of funds donated to Ukip through a call centre in Kent has been paid into the party’s head office accounts.

Outrage over the Ashford call centre has been blamed for the resignations of at least six senior party officials over the past 18 months.

Five former members of the party’s national executive committee, Ukip’s governing body, have told this newspaper they believe about £500,000 is unaccounted for in the party’s head office accounts.

These claims are disputed by Ukip’s leader, Nigel Farage. “All the money raised by Ashford can be seen in the accounts for the south-east unit – no money has disappeared,” he said.

“The Ashford call centre was something that I opened up. It doubled the party’s membership and it made a very substantial profit. It’s the single most successful thing Ukip has ever done. “

The Ashford call centre was set up in October 2003 by Mr Farage, who then ran Ukip’s south-east regional office. Staff processed donations and annual membership subscriptions.

However, even though the staff processed donations from across the country the money was paid into the accounts controlled by the south-east office.

Members of the NEC at the time said they were appalled that this allowed Mr Farage to control the majority of donations to the party. They also said for a nine month period in 2004 and 2005 Mr Farage declined to provide the NEC with details of how much money the call centre generated. Mr Farage claimed that the south-east unit controlled the office because the central party did not want to. “The NEC did not want to have any responsibility or risk for Ashford because we had run call centres in the past at a substantial loss,” he said.

“We ran call centres in London and they lost £5,000 to £6,000 every month. I said: ‘This is ludicrous, let’s do this professionally’. The NEC refused to take responsibility for it.”

Mr Farage said that the call centre raised at least £400,000 over three years. He said the majority of this money was spent on promotional DVDs, videos, postage and leaflets.

Last week, The Sunday Telegraph revealed that Ukip filed its latest head office accounts more than six months late. It is understood that over the past few days some of the party’s donors have sought assurance from the Electoral Commission before they donate more to the party.

However, disgruntled party insiders said questions about the call centre, which closed last year, are a “running sore that won’t stop”.

A recent resignation letter by Ukip’s former chairman in Wales, Richard Suchorzewsji, refers to “financial and transparency issues” involving “the Ashford call centre and various aspects of Ukip accounts”.

It is understood that the call centre was also one of the motives for the resignation of Linda Guest, who last week sent a fiercely-worded letter to the party’s chairman, Dr John Whittaker, and other members of the NEC. She wrote: “I see no point in supporting any party that is controlled by a leadership that displays such contempt for democracy when it comes to its own members.”

To view the original unbelieved excuses from 2.1/2 years ago CLICK HERE

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU
&
GET BRITAIN BACK

THE FAKE PHOTO OF NIGEL FARAGE WAS SOURCED AT
http://www.andrewcusack.com/nigfarage2.jpg
or AS SUPPLIED TO THE BNP
http://www.bnp.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/pol-nigelfarage045a.jpg
FARAGE IS STANDING IN A MUDDY PUDDLE ON A BUILDING SITE & THIS PHOTO WAS OPENLY RELEASED BY THE EU FUNDED EUkip PRESS OFFICE

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Ashford; Corruption; Dishonesty; Lies; | Leave a Comment »

#603* – EUkip ENDLESSLY DESTROYS ITSELF

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 28/08/2009

#603* – EUkip ENDLESSLY DESTROYS ITSELF

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

EUkip ENDLESSLY DESTROYS ITSELF – IF THEY COULD DO WHAT THEY ARE PAID TO DO AS COMPETENTLY THEY JUST MIGHT HAVE A FUTURE!!

Hi,

Living in Monmouthshire I become aware of activities in wales before many and UKIP is very thin on the ground in Wales & Monmouthshire – mainly due to lack of calibre and the incredibly unpleasant nature of many of the few who do exist.

I made little of a nebish councillor on an utterly irrelevant council reneging on his electorate who voted for an independent and now find they have some clown obsessed with such important matters as chewing gum, sex with murder suspects, smoking and other UTTER irrelevances.

My word how many publicans must be heaving a sigh of relief that they can claim a smoking ban has destroyed their business rather than admit it is largely due to their inability to change with the times and admit they have been out manoeuvered by competitors in a period where there are ever more pubs closing down despite the increase in licenses granted for on sales!

I wonder if these failed publicans have noticed that there are no flint axe makers left and few people enter department stores trying to buy gas mantles.

Yes I saw the article in Wales on line when it was first published but felt a story about a nobody in an irrelevant council supporting an irrelevant party EUkip was pretty much irrelevant.

Lets face it all parties have problems at their lower end – should they be blamed when their minions are found wanting?

I note the story was given large on Anthony Butcher’s corrupt little forum and on EUkip’s main site when these two characters became turncoats. One would think it was the second coming!! I guess since EUkip has so few elected representatives out of the 30,000 electable offices in Britain syphonning off £500,000,000 from the public purse for themselves, EUkip still have less than 20 for all their huff and puff! For source on 30,000 CLICK HERE

OK so parties have problems – they have candidates who get charged with sodomy of minors like EUkip did, they have MEPs who get sent to prison like EUkip, they have MEPs who lied about who they were to get elected like EUkip did, they have MEPs facing criminal proceedings like EUkip, they have a leader who has trousered £Millions like EUkip, they have a chairman who is a liar and a cheat like EUkip, they have bent ex coppers in office like EUkip, they have Press Officeers with convictions for theft of public money like EUkip, they have advisers who are serial business failure like EUkip, they have researchers potentially facing prison like EUkip, they have had a majority of their MEPs under investigation by Police &/or OLAF like EUkip, they have been found guilty in Court of criminal electoral fund raising like EUkip, they run unregistered lotteries without accounting the income like EUkip, they are dependent on turncoats for noticable representation like EUkip.

So I overlooked an irrelevant turncoat councillor or two!

Then I noted that Junius had made much of the matter, what was UKIP Forum had given it large and General Election Blog had also.

I then thought of the criminal cases that could befal a party, as listed above and minded that EUkip have a mere 20 or so elected representatives out of 30,000 yet I could not think of another party which could lay claim to each of the examples given of crime or missdoings!

So here is the article:

EUkip: Welsh EUkip Turncoat councillor makes a fool of himself!

A VALLEYS councillor is under investigation by his own party, following a web forum posting asking if people wanted to bed a murder suspect.

Adam Brown was one of two previously Independent members of Merthyr Tydfil Council who last month announced they were joining UKIP.

Since August 2007 the Gurnos councillor has been a regular contributor to the Bluebirds fans’ web forum cardiffcity.com

On July 18, a posting from Coun Brown’s account launched a poll on the question “Amanda Knox? Would you…?”

Amanda Knox is an American student currently on trial for allegedly murdering fellow student Meredith Kercher in the house they shared in Perugia, Italy, in 2007.

In a posting on July 21, Mr Brown chipped in to a discussion about rented accommodation on the same forum.

In it he said: “Simple really don’t take housing benefit tenants. Not worth the risk.”

Then on July 8 he initiated a poll called: “Does anyone give a **** about [Cardiff City manager] Dave Jones’ book…?”

Brendan Toomey, leader of the Merthyr Council Labour group, said: “If these comments were made by Coun Brown, and it looks very much as if they were, then he has slurred many of his constituents who are legitimately claiming housing benefit.

“To suggest that it is too risky for a private landlord to take on housing benefit claimants is entirely offensive.

“As for conducting a ‘poll’ regarding murder suspect Amanda Knox, it is obvious what Coun Brown is alluding to, and I find it completely insensitive and inappropriate.

“Labour will be referring him to the standards committee and I hope his national party leader will discipline him for his behaviour.”

Commenting on the Amanda Knox poll, Mr Brown at first said: “It was an example of ‘laddish’ behaviour on a football message board over two years ago.”

When it was pointed out that the Amanda Knox posting occurred last month rather than more than two years ago, he said he wanted to revise his statement, saying he knew nothing about it.

He thought a friend must have posted the comment using his (Mr Brown’s) username.

He admitted posting the messages about housing benefit and Dave Jones’ book. He claimed he had been put off letting to tenants on housing benefit after tenants living in a home he owns in Merthyr caused £5,000 worth of damage.

Last night UKIP Wales MEP John Bufton said the party would launch an inquiry into the matter.
To view the original article CLICK HERE

To Quote Junius on the matter:

Oh dear. UKIP’s leadership can really pick em. It never rains but it pours!

His first month as a UKIP councillor and already he is facing an inquiry and possible expulsion from the party!

Such is the calibre of UKIP’s latest recruits!

For more on this fool see my previous article: LINK

For Junius’ original of these comments CLICK HERE

You will note my cautionary posting when these two irrelevant little councillors were first much vaunted by EUkip on their web site (for lack of good news one must presume) and Kevin Mahoney was near orgasmic in his glee on Butcher’s squalid little forum – however who would really expect much more from Mahoney with his vituperative attitude and lack of political nouse as he drifts from party to party seeking someone foolish enough to grant him preferrment – unaware of the damage he does EUkip with his support.

I gave the caution on Junius Blog as follows:

Greg L-W. said…
Hi,

do correct me if I am wrong but it seems these two relatively irrelevant chappies on Merthyr Town Council having been elected as Independent have fallen out with everyone and have refused to participate in a democratic decision of the council (one I might say, with which I heartily disagree – even in the new communist style Governance from The EU!)

On this issue of earth shattering importance they in their sagacity decided to betray their electorate who wanted Independent Councillors, and become party bound.

Since EUkip’s avowed policies are to assist the EU in creating Pan EU political (Parties) Groups and imposing greater subsidiarity on Britain with EUkip working in committees to ensure better legislation over vassal states and throwing their lot in as good EUropeans to lead the racist, xenophobic, sexually intollerant EFD who advocate bombing and machine gunning immigrants and dressing up perverts as rabbits and hunting them.

Do you think it will make much difference having these hunts in the Valleys?

SORRY – DUE TO SPACE LIMITATIONS in Blogger answers I have continued this at:
http://CaterpillarsAndButterflies.blogspot.com #590* being posted just after 15:00 03-Aug-2009

My apologies to the Juniae and I will well understand if you opt not to publish the link!

But I will be a little M***** after all that work ensuring accuracy to publish the truth 😉

Regards,
Greg L-W.

03 August 2009 09:21

To view my original comment CLICK HERE

To view the full comment/article with pics. etc. CLICK HERE

Clearly it would seem EUkip will take anybody’s cast offs – one need only consider the liar and cheat Bannerman, the discreditted and dishonest political prostitute Marta Andreasen, the Tory reject Bob Spink who eventually so soundly denounced EUkip.

EUkip finds itself made yet further of a fool by Wales OnLine with:

AND a big week for the UK Independence Party too, as two Merthyr Tydfil councillors joined the party, giving Ukip its first council seats in the Valleys.

Adam Brown and Neil “Jock” Greer were previously independents, but who can doubt they will provide a huge boost for a party whose representatives have often had a reputation for being fruit-loops with incoherent views?

Mr Brown has passionately campaigned for a ban on the sale of chewing gum in Merthyr town centre and lives outside the borough because his house in Merthyr reminds him of his dead grandmother. Mr Greer has previously stood for the complete-opposite-of-Ukip, Forward Wales and last year attacked those councillors who switched party allegiance without submitting themselves to a by-election (which he himself is now doing).

They should fit right in, eh?

The original being at CLICK HERE

I do not for a moment define any of these hundreds of facts as more than small matters but I challenge EUkip to balance their own books by showing their big achievements made by their own efforts since their foundation in 1993.

As a long term and VERY active supporter of UKIP and an unflinching opponent over almost half a century of racism, sexual intollerance, corruption and loss of Justice, our Sovereignty, our rights to self determination and continued right to control of our borders, foreign policy, defence and alegiances in trade and commerce throughout the world both in and outside of The Anglosphere and The Commonwealth.

I would dearly love to have seen achievements of UKIP of which decent people of integrity and morality with ethics and patriotism could support.

One notes the minisculism used by their vile staff and senior supporters that so demean EUkip as they TRY to nit pick their way attacking unsalaried past devotees and ex supporters. Surely these imbeciles realise that the likes of Croucher, Septic, Mick McGough, StAthan (Kevin (Foxy) Mahoney need we wonder at his shame and use of a false name!), Douglas Denny, Brendan Padmore, The congenital idiot Bob Feel Martinis (a EUkip PPC!!!!!!!!!!), Paul Nuttall (lies, bullying and corruption), little Joshua Onion and all his sock puppets and others like them on Forums do far more harm to EUkip than ever could Junius, Warry, Collier, Gillman, West or even myself – they give absolute credibility to our postings as they struggle to defend the indefensible.

They show our various blogs and postings to be factually accurate as like fleas climbing an elephants leg with intent to rape they clamour and shout of the achievement they aim to make and how false are the statements of individuals like us as they run from fair and open debate.

per exempio read the clamourings about ‘The Defence Fund’ clearly in an attempt NOT to establish the truth but to deflect attention from the £Millions gone missing from EUkip it seems. Had they wished to establish the facts and truth they would merely pick up the phone and ask me for any detail they want. They have my telephone number!

Yet they run away from the truth to hide their shame!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU
&
GET BRITAIN BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Butcher; Brown; Greer; Nuttall; Bannerman; | Leave a Comment »

#602* – JUNIUS CLARIFIED on EUkip’s NAUGHTY BOYS!!!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 27/08/2009

#602* – JUNIUS CLARIFIED on EUkip’s NAUGHTY BOYS!!!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

JUNIUS CLARIFIED on EUkip’s STRANGELY STYLED NAUGHTY BOYS!!!!

You may recall that I recently published an article on a certain UKIP MEP who had been seen leaving a ‘gay’ club in the company of a black gentlemen.

Here is the original article in full:

A UKIP MEP – one of the new intake – was spotted at 3 am this morning leaving a notorious gay club in Strasbourg

He was seen by the researcher of a Tory MEP leaving the club in the company of a black man. What Mr X was doing in a gay club at that time of the morning should perhaps be left to the imagination!

There has been constant speculation in UKIPPER circles about this MEP’s sexuality ever since he first joined UKIP. He has always denied being a homosexual and has repeatedly said that he is “still looking for the right woman”.

I hate to disappoint him but I don’t think he will find her in that particular club!

I can confirm that UKIP’s Press Office got so upset over this damaging exposé that they immediately went into spin mode.

They even managed to get Paul Wesson – aka Aardvark – to post a denial on the British Democracy Forum.

Here is the denial:

‘Seven’ is the name of the bar and the bouncer is indeed a black guy who is known to many parliamentarians. Apparently it is not a gay bar.

He later added:

My Brussels/Strasbourg sources suggest other MEPs of different parties frequent the joint. They’re all ‘in the clear’.

And:

we have no time, no date, no MEP name and no ‘witness’.

I am saddened that Mr Wesson – a usually intelligent man – was so ready to promote UKIP’s lies and propaganda.

And if Mr Wesson had bothered to read my original article he would have seen that I did in fact give a time, date, location and witness.

Can I suggest that in future Mr Wesson checks the facts before he again decides to promote UKIP Press Office lies?

Here are the facts:

The MEP was seen leaving a notorious gay club at 3am in the morning.

The incident took place on 16th July.

The club is located in the centre of Strasbourg.

It was not the ‘Seven’ club.

He was seen leaving the club in the company of a black man.

They were alone.

The black man was not a bouncer from the club.

The witness was a researcher for a Tory MEP. He does not wished to named at this time.

The MEP’s sexuality has been in question for some time.

Now it has been suggested that the sexual activities of this particular MEP are irrelevant.

This would be true if the MEP in question was open about his sexuality.

But he is not open about his sexuality.

He has lied about his sexuality to his colleagues. He has lied about his sexuality both to the public and UKIP members. Would he have been selected as a lead MEP candidate if UKIP members had known he was a homosexual? I very much doubt it.

And he still promotes the laughable story that he is looking for the ‘right woman’ – another lie.

These lies can be added to the other lies promoted by this man – his bogus ancestry for a start.

The man is a liar and needs to be exposed as such.

We need open and honest politicians – not serial liars who frequent sleazy gay clubs in the centre of Strasbourg or Brussels.

To view JUNIUS’ Original article CLICK HERE

Hi,

May I submit Junius rather misses the point.

Firstly David Bannerman is a liar and a cheat and whether he had been a pedarast with an interest in necrphilliac bestiality would have made little difference to his placement as lead MEP candidate in The Eastern Region.

May I remind Junius that EUkip’s own returning officer has shown that the process of placement of the unpleasant list of candidates was utterly corrupt.

Junius and others may recal that Stuart Agnew loudly boasted that he had bought his position (I guess based on ability he had little choice!) , One only needs to note that no result to Jeffrey Titford’s or Stuart Gulleyslime’s investigation by the police and OLAF are ongoing and the attempts of the risible Zucherman for attempted witness intimidation are still in the hands of his union officials the Law Society.

I understand that Farage & Nuttall are still being slowly reeled in by the authorities and EUkip itself may well fall IF justice is done. The police when last I spoke with them are still persuing the abuses of Data by both the party and its executive and staff.

Clearly from my other blog CLICK HERE or CLICK HERE or CLICK HERE you will note I have more than proved that we can not trust our police or our courts to deliver justice – but let us hopw the various inquiries into EUkip see justice done and prison sentences used in an exemplary manner.

What the perversion of a EUkip candidate may be is an irrelevance as the party has shown it is without dignity, decency or duty.

What David Bannerman’s sexual perversions may be has been shown to be irrelevant as are the opinions of the members who are regularly betrayed by the, without exception, scum that now leads the vile EUkip.

The SW Regional committee called for the banning of Gawain Towler – particularly after the revelations of his being caught by his wife, in the bath with his daughter, in an inappropriate condition. This has been admitted to as I am informed by several people.

Further Malcolm Wood made it clear that Gawain Towler had admitted his shameful behaviour leading to the extraordinary comment from the authority on such matters Elizabeth Burton:
‘Don’t all men get inappropriate conditions in a nice warm bath’!

That Gawain Towler admits – nay even boasts of certain of his perversions on his web site is clearly acceptable to his wife – tasteless, degenerate and ill judged as many may find it – however his wife was so concerned and angry at this incident that she posted details of his activities with his daughter on the internet, as Towler has confirmed. It was only posted for a short time before one assumes his wife realised that a criminal pariah was unlikely to deliver much by way of maintinance and it was removed with much sabre rattling – but long after screen capture and Gawain’s own verbal confirmation to various others.

The individuals disgust me not for their legal perversions but for their venal disregard for morality and ethics and their willingness to aid the destruction of what USED TO BE Britain’s best hope for liberation from The EU until EUkip became a part of the very institution that its members so reveilled.

The committee decided that The SW did not wish to campaign for, nor risk being represented by a man espousing such morals.

You will remember that in absolute disregard for either the members or of the principles of democracy Nigel Farage in dictatorial style overturned the wishes of the membership and reinstated the odious Towler! Such arrogance from such an incompetent is staggering – is it any wonder a drunken womaniser who consorts with prostitutes whilst trousering huge amounts of money pretending to represent others finds himself so closely in affinity with some of the most vile politicians in EUrope since Eichman, Goebbels, Mitterand, Himmler, Funk and Barbie in forming his new pan EU Party Group The NFD

Perhaps he and the odious liar and cheat Bannerman would be more at home in The Labour Party where Harrier Harman, doubtless with the consent of her husband Mr. Dromey the union leader as she campaigned for liberalisation of the laws of incest and lowering of the age of consent!

I do not decry legal perversions, but I do personally consider those who function in so small a minority, being between 1.1/2 > 2.1/2%, with a life style aberrant and perverse to the norm must surely be seen as of questionable validity as representatives of the norm!

Those that lie about their perversions and their ancestry, their achievements and their values must surely be seen as unsound. Just as I consider the discreditted Marta Andreasen, due to her lack of honesty, of morality, of ethics or of British values as a political prostitute is clearly an unwise choice to be placed high on various lists for we know for certain she cheated and lied to be GIVEN her position. AND had touted herself around various parties willing to prostitute HER principles to get her snout in the EU troughs again. Be minded she applied to the Christian Democrats TWICE and was turned down TWICE as unsuitable! The Tories made it VERY clear the first time!

EUkip is rotten to the core – as a long term supporter of UKIP I am revolted by the betrayal by the scum that run EUkip. Liars, petty crooks, fraudsters, cheats and the venally self interested they have gathered with others most like them to form the pan EU party EFD!! Racists, advocates of killing imigrants, ‘HUNTING’ and shooting homeless imigrants, ethnically cleansing perverst etc. etc. Oh how very EUkip in their now comfort zone as useful idiots for the EU.

We even note that EUkip’s Chairman Paul Nuttall’s dabblings in politics show the most staggering lack of knowledge or undertanding of Britain’s political structure – whether in his blatant lies and bullying before he was dishonestly placed in Gregg Beaman’s position as the lead candidate, in total denial of the principles of democracy, or his insult to the voters in his region within moments of having gained the position of MEP based on his lies, cheating and the dustbin protest vote – that such garbage was put in place is hardly surprising but sickenning for UKIP.

Paul Nuttall is a bully, a liar, a cheat and a petty crook – may I suggest you read his postings on Anthony Butcher’s EUkip fanzeen Forum!

Regards,
Greg L-W.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU
&
GET BRITAIN BACK

‘inappropriate condition’ substituted for the facts shortly after posting the truth.

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Bannerman; Gawain Towler; Perversion; Elizabeth Burton; Marta Andreasen; Malcolm Wood; corruption; Incest; | Leave a Comment »

#601* – EUkip & FACING The GENERAL ELECTION

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/08/2009

#601* – EUkip & FACING The GENERAL ELECTION

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!


#601* – EUkip & FACING The GENERAL ELECTION – Opinions, Including Dr. Eric EDMOND, elected by UKIP members to EUkip NEC.

2010 General Election – a Poisoned Challice

I am increasingly coming to the view that winning the 2010 UK General Election will be worse than losing it. The conventional view is that with finances in such a mess taxes will have to rise and public services be cut to bring some sense of fiscal probity to HMG. Without this the UK credit rating may well slip from AAA and we will have to pay a higher interest rate price to sell government debt, gilts. These necessary actions will be horrendously unpopular politically and will lead to a host of sob stories on UK TV with single mothers, the unemployed especially the young and the homeless being portrayed as victims of an uncaring government. This is an unedifying prospect for any government, particularly one with a small or no majority facing another election in 2011/12.

The over riding aim of all politicians however is to be re-elected back on to the gravy train. Margaret Beckett’s claims in the DT this morning that “A career in politics leaves MPs out of pocket” is risible and shows how out of touch she is with the electorate. Does she take us for fools? The obvious conflict of interest between a desire to be re-elected and the poisoned challice is easily resolved – be relected as an opposition MP! This needs you to be selected for safe Labour seat and there may be some competition for those even after the expense claim junkies have been weeded out. The nice thing is you will then have Dave’s inexperienced A listers to shoot at for a couple of years on a ‘result’ wicket just like at the Oval. Even Labour’s bowling will look good and when Dave is skittled out for a low score, well all options are open!

The elephants in the room, the EU, Islamic birth rates and culture, the white under class living on benefits won’t get a mention by the main parties. Why not? Because they are all vote losers stupid. Another sure fire vote loser is Farage‘s pet project to bring back grammar schools. For every child that gets into grammar school five to ten will not. So its one winner who might vote for you and five or more losers who will vote against you. I believe in selection in education but you have go to be a lot more subtle about how to bring it back than Farage‘s simplistic approach. The Cabal don’t do subtle. They are not clever enough.

So how will UKIP fare in the UK general election? Not very well I fear. The leaders are all nicely tucked up in Brussels so there is no real incentive. There is also no District Councillor base to build on and no UKIP policies targetted at this election despite the valiant efforts of people like Alan Wood in Salisbury to build both these areas up. UKIP’s core, get out of the EU policy is not a GE issue and is easy meat for its opponents who can point to the UKIP MEPs like Andreasen who is clearly not a withdrawalist.

Worse for UKIP however is that the BNP may get an MP. They have a local authority base in some areas with a number of councillors on some councils. The UK electoral system rewards this geographical concentration of support. Also the BNP core stop immigration policy will be a big issue in the General Election especially in these areas that people have to meet the effects of immigration day in and day out. They are a transparently British party, based in, and run from, and financed in UK . They don’t have an Andreasen/EU flank that opponents can attack them on. They will almost certainly come second in one or two seats and thus be well placed for a further push if there is a quick second election.

All in all I fear UKIP has probably seen its electoral high water mark.

To view his original article CLICK HERE

Hi,

surely UKIP’s biggest problem is that they have clearly ‘gone native’ as EUkip.

Not only do they have the discreditted foreign national Marta Andreasen, who has been serially fired for her failure as a bean counter and even incurred allegations of racism when suspended by the OECD. A pro EU reformist who whored her principles around several parties before she could find one dumb enough or corrupt enough to be taken in by her – including TWO interviews with The Christian Alliance Party where at both of which she was rejected!

Then there is Trevor Colman who colluded in the theft of public money by seeking to cover up the frauds for which Tom Wise is currently facing the courts with Lindsay Jenkins. It does look as if Colman’s ‘payolla’ for his collusion in crime, as an ex cop, was first place on the MEP list with a safish seat!

That EUkip has several MEPs under investigation by the Police, Legal Authorities and OLAF can help little – clearly their MEP (until he stood down) Tom Wise & their researcher being in Court for money laundering can help little.

Then of course the fact that they are likely to be penalised to the tune of around £1/2Million on the guilty verdict of The Westminster Magistrates Courts. There are also seemingly several £M of public money that would appear to have been trousered by EUkip!

A further problem EUkip will have at The GE is that they have allied with the people they see most like them to form a pan EU Political Party Group – thus they are now associated with extremist racists, advocates of xenophobic killings and sexually intollerant to form the EFD!

Perhaps EUkip should consider who actually saved them from wipeout in the EU elections and got 13 such crass MEPs in place:

Most Expensive MPs 2007/8
Member name Total claimed
1 Eric Joyce £187,334
2 Michael Connarty £183,466
3 Alistair Carmichael £176,190
4 Ben Wallace £175,523
5 Mohammad Sarwar £174,882
6 Charles Kennedy £174,232
7 Janet Anderson £173,556
8 David S Borrow £172,706
9 Jim McGovern £171,989
10 Fabian Hamilton £171,824

Greatly helped by such crass dishonesty as that of Hazel Blears, Elliott Morley, Barbara Follett, Alan Duncan, The Kirkhopes and their ilk.

I doubt EUkip’s integrity such that they may award them medals at conference for their help, for without them EUkip WOULD NOT have had more than one or two MEPs elected and rightly so based on their track record and achievements with 12 elected MEPs during the preceding 5 years, during which they achieved virtually nothing of value to these United kingdoms, stole public money, abused their positions trashed their party UKIP and dragged the party into the gutter where clearly the leadership were more at home.

One need only read much of their publicity!

EUkip has destroyed UKIP with its dishonesty, lies, cheating and corruption.

They will NOT get an MP elected – a tragedy that UKIP has been so betrayed by its leadership – some of whom have even been ‘wangling’ for place with UKFirstParty without even resigning from EUkip – no doubt hoping to ride both horses to double their personal chances!

Sadly those left in EUkip have little or no understanding of morality, honesty, duty or ethics.

I have previously asked how David Bannerman, Nikki Sinclair, Gawain Towler etc. feel about having been grouped with the openly sexually intollerant politicians of the Lega Nord and others who believe perverts should be ‘hunted, shot at and driven out’.

How do such as William Dartmouth square the circle, regardless of his dishonest and corrupt minder Malcolm Wood, with the view that imigrants in boats should be machine gunned and bombed?

We know, based on her track record, that Marta Andreasen will be happy to prostitute herself to any view and to lie and cheat to keep her snout in the EU troughs on the gravy train.

Then again we have asked whether EUkip’s accounts are a fraud or whether Farage is a liar and has been stealing party money – answer came there none!

Do remember that we were assured by the foolish Nattrass that he had donated more to EUkip than he had earned – strange since there is no equivallence in the accounts – was he telling lies or are the accounts totally fraudulent?

Seriousy could any honest Brit. of morality advocate these low lifes should represent us anywhere let alone Westminster – of course not. No patriot would wish for such trash in our Parliament – the ones there now are an obscenity without adding such vile people as EUkip puts forward and fields as its spokesmen!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Corruption; Gone Native; | Leave a Comment »

#600* – MAY I PRESUME TO REMIND YOU AS THIS IS POSTING #600!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/08/2009

PLEASE HELP PUBLICISE THIS POST BY CIRCULATING THE DETAILS IN WHOLE OR IN PART AS WIDELY AS YOU CAN – THANKS

The Direct Link to include
in your ‘e’Mails and on your Blogs & Forums is:
http://caterpillarsandbutterflies.blogspot.com/2009/08/600-may-i-presume-to-remind-you-as-this.html

#600* – MAY I PRESUME TO REMIND YOU
AS THIS IS POSTING #600!

There are only 38 Days until The Irish are forced to vote again in a referendum to ratify The New Constitution Lisbon Treaty.

You may well find some facts to use to help them or some ideas if you CLICK HERE

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Similarly may I remind you that you can help in another matter of common justice, which you may have read of in Christopher Booker‘s column in The Sunday Telegraph this week.

Photo: UPPA
Lord Justice Wall
described East Sussex‘s behaviour as ‘disgraceful’

For more specific details CLICK HERE

If you would like more general info on the subject CLICK HERE

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You may also wish to know more of the details regarding this man:

Which you will find if you CLICK HERE
& there will be numerous more entries to add to the several already posted, during the coming week or so.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

But to really understand some of the background you will need to know more of this man:

Whose behaviour in the matter and that of 13-Mar-1996 can in my opinion be described as little short of evil.

For more background data CLICK HERE

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You may find the words of Lord Burton of interest:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You will find much additional information if you CLICK HERE particularly if you follow the many links.

Then return to this blog and start reading back through the 600 postings in the realisation that in not a single one have I ever set out to mislead or have I ever failed to provide the truth and substantiation – I understand that to date I have NEVER made a substantive error or stated an untruth.

You must judge for yourself and if you are in any doubt of the facts having read the blog please do not hesitate to contact me and I will readilly endeavour to clarify and if you find an error PLEASE contact me and if it is substantive I will not only publish the correction but will make the appropriate apology.

I do appreciate that the scum that now support and run EUkip would rather tittle and tattle than address the facts and that they are only too happy to lie about me where they can hide behind false names or on platforms where dishonesty prevails and I have no right of response.

Interestingly NEVER ONCE have any of the mischief makers called me giving their identity to check a fact nor to correct an entry, save once where I had been misled deliberately over a resignation by two EUkip apparatchiks and the correction was made with apology within minutes!

If you repeat ANY statement I have made on my blogs I will be only too happy to stand by the statement and you in any Court in defence of the truth – assuming you have quoted me accurately and in context.

I make no claims of infallibility but you may be assured that I will honestly try to do my best in the causes I support. Including in support of UKIP, which I have fearlessly and constantly supported for over a dozen years.

It is sad to have watched so many of the honest activists of UKIP either drift away or become corrupted and follow the venal and utterly dishonest and dishonourable venal path of EUkip in such betrayal of these United Kingdoms. EUkip has not only associated itself with some of the most vile politicians in EUropean politics but has attracted like minded support from a vicious and vile claque seeking their own enrichment and aggrandisement.

EUkip has become a disgrace to these United kingdoms and I fear it may be too late for UKIP but we can but hope!

If I can help YOU in an honest and honourable endeavour of a patriotic or moral nature PLEASE do not hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

Greg L-W.

For my FULL contact details CLICK HERE

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

I SUGGEST –
since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

#599* – AN OPEN LETTER re: Gawain TOWLER

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/08/2009

#599* – AN OPEN LETTER re: Gawain TOWLER

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

AN OPEN LETTER re: Gawain TOWLER! IN THE LIGHT OF THE MISREPRESENTATION OF THE LOW LIFES SUPPORTING THE CORRUPTION IN EUkip & the apparent deliberate misrepresentation by the ever childish and imature Chris Mounsey.

IN RESPONSE TO A UKIP MEMBER’S ENQUIRY.

Hi,

some time ago you asked about Gawain Towler, and what I thought of him as an MEP candidate, which I outlined in some detail.

I note that he is likely to be an MP candidate in your area!

I also note that Anthony Butcher’s much corrupted and dishonest little forum has seen fit, in its pro EUkip section, where it is accepted for pro EUkip members to lie, libel and dissemble, largely without let or hindrance, sheltering in shame behind false names; yet those who support UKIP but expose the truth about their vile leadership as EUkip are removed, either on the flimsiest of pretext or based on lies, as in my case to lie yet again.

You may remember that I stated as a fact that Peter Reeve EUkip’s bully boy RO with the shaven head and lack of understanding of ethics or morality in the Eastern Region was under investigation by the police – which he was, and a number was supplied for the police complaint; none the less the corrupt and duplicitous moderator Brendan Padmore (sheltering his duplicity behind the silly name BA Ware!), in support of EUkip, and Anthony Butcher banned me for life having been threatened and bullied with a pack of lies from another of EUkip’s scum that has floated upward – Paul Nuttall, who is a proven liar and cheat.

Back to Gawain Towler who is a particularly odious little man, beyond his mere perversions – he is a liar as shown by various ‘e’Mails I have. Sent to me by someone whom he was trying to deceive.

As you well know over a number of years I have neither interest or prejudice based on people’s perfectly legal perversions, and perversion within marriage is no concern of others outside of the relationship, save where it may be either illegal or publicly harmful particularly to children.

As you will see from my comments on my blog – this is clearly NOT about prejudice or revulsion at particular perversions, for as long as they are legal. This is entirely about values and judgement, taste, trust and braggadocio.

It is my belief and contention, as it was The UKIP South West Committee’s, that Gawain Towler has shown himself to be unsuited to represent others in a political party as an MEP and I would contend unsuitable as a constituency MP.

Gawain Towler’s legal perversions are of no concern to me; though some, with a narrower view of the world, such as many Christians and all Muslims would be concerned. Towler’s alleged illegal perversions, though widely discussed, are a matter for the authorities to substantiate and act accordingly.

I would not have raised this matter again had not some on Anthony Butcher’s forum not seen fit to exercise their dishonesty to misrepresent my perfectly clear stance as some sort of delusional attack on me – sadly EUkip has attracted all too many perfectly vile and dishonest supporters who clamour like the claque of old!

There are various other articles on Gawain Towler on my blog which you can find with the search engine if you wish but for starters:

http://caterpillarsandbutterflies.blogspot.com/2009/04/425-eukip-must-be-so-proud-in-south.html

http://juniusonukip.blogspot.com/2009/04/blog-entry-that-gawain-towler-did-not.html
and the comments thereon!

I note that on Chris Mountsey’s web site, as republished on Butcher’s squalid forum, I stand accused of libelling him!
If I have I unreservedly apologise, as I have always tried to be accurate and honest and can think of no occasion where I would have wished either to libel him or to have misled others about him. Were his claim true he is of course encouraged to show where I have supposedly libelled him and I will not only make correction but clearly apologise.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
[to Reply: Greg@GlanceBack.Demon.co.UK other addresses are auto spam filtered]

http://GregLanceWatkins.blogspot.com
for my contact details, blogs & views

We must work together to liberate these United Kingdoms from the undemocratic, corrupt, centralised, unaccountable and allien EUropean Union, which has been so damaging to Britain both in cost and destruction of our values, industry, commerce, governance, defence, British Justice, Commonwealth, borders & the Anglosphere.

No trustworthy politician has EVER provided a single solitary benefit of membership of The EU which justifies the £1.8 Million / Hour cost or loss of self determination and foreign or trade policy.

We All Know the benefits for politicians of the feeding troughs on The EU Gravy Train and the corruption at Westminster, where MPs & Peers are not required to declare the identity of their EU paymasters when they debate or vote!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in Gawain Towler; Chris Mounsey; Anthony Butcher; Peter Reeve; | Leave a Comment »

#598* – THE STENCH OF DECAY IS EUkip!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/08/2009

#598* – THE STENCH OF DECAY IS EUkip!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

THE STENCH OF DECAY IS EUkip, AS JUNIUS SHOWS – NOT JUST FARAGE & ROTTEN FISH!!

UKIP recent election results:

So much for Nigel Farage’s claim that UKIP’s support has increased since the Euro elections!

Goldsmid Ward, Brighton & Hove DC 23th July
Green 1456
Conservative 1104
Labour 816
Lib Dem 280
UKIP 129

Denton Ward, Tameside B.C 30th July
Labour 1258
Conservative 660
BNP 358
UKIP 193
Green 164

Brinsley by-election 30th July
Conservative 416
BNP 288
Lib Dems 224
Labour 68
UKIP 21

UKIP’s support has now dropped back to pre-Euro election levels.

Under Farage’s inept leadership UKIP is still not seen as an alternative to the old party system. UKIP is simply regarded as the party of the Euro election protest vote – nothing more, nothing less.

But does Farage really care? He has been re-elected to the EU Gravy Train where he can claim even more in expenses, sit on committees, indulge in stupid stunts, get drunk in bars and forget his marriage vows.

Such a shame. UKIP could have made a real difference. But rather than use our MEPs to promote our domestic policies – when UKIP’s leadership can be bothered to publish them – Farage and co waste their time sitting on worthless EU committees.

Farage has been an MEP for ten years but we are still no closer to seeing Britain leave the EU. So much for UKIP battling for Britain and independence!

UKIP exists to serve the ego of one man. Until Farage and his sycophants are removed UKIP will continue to stagnate.

Don’t waste your time or your vote on UKIP, Farage or his dishonest, sycophantic MEPs.

Hi,

IN COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE ABOVE

It is unfortunate that EUkip has so undeniably destroyed the principles and ideals of UKIP.

The catastrophic UKIP results in the EU election where UKIP failed to get a single solitary reputable MEP elected merely liars, cheats and low lifes elected by those protesting against Westminster politicians putting their vote in the ballo0t box as with a dustbin.

No wonder with the dustbin vote they got garbage – garbage that sees itself as useful idiots working for the EU in return for incrementally enhanced bribes – a group which aware no one of stature or morality would wish to be associated with them has formed a grouping of some of the most vile scum in EUropean politics since WWII.

The true value of EUkip to the British electorate is shown in their votes at By-elections and local elections!!

To understand much of this problem one need only look at each of their MEPs one by one, then consider their salaried praise singers one at a time and then see just what vile creatures support them in public, such as on Butcher’s corrupt little Forum, where many are so ashamed of their comments they hide behind silly names and others like Denny, Croucher, Onion, McGough and their ilk have done irreprable harm to the party, parlous as it is.

Junius with his mere factual statements has shown beyond doubt that EUkip is utterly politically irrelevant.

Of some 30,000 elected offices costing £Billions (where 646 MPs cost over £500M) and where an MEP can and largely does, trouser £1Million during their term – Even a corrupt congenital idiot like Tom Wise has ammassed a pension fund of around £1/4Million in just one term!

Of the 30,000 offices note howmany EUkip hold! 13 MEPs by default and around 7 or 8 elected councillors!

Clearly for all Farage and his cronies venal self enrichment Junius shows just what a waste of time the party is at large!.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in by-elections; EUkip; UKIP; Brinsley;Tameside; Brighton and Hove; | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: