Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

Archive for October, 2009

#693* – AS EUkip LEADER WHAT ARE MALCOLM WOOD’s VIEWS ON ISLAM?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 31/10/2009

#693* – AS EUkip LEADER WHAT ARE MALCOLM WOOD’s VIEWS ON ISLAM?

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

AS EUkip LEADER WHAT ARE MALCOLM WOOD’s VIEWS ON ISLAM?!

Speaking on behalf of Malcolm Wood Farage‘s chosen new leader of EUkip we note that Lord Pearson’s view is that:

01. Islamics breed at 10 times the speed of the indigenous peoples of Britain.

02. Perverts be they male or female homosexuals should be used by The Church as the spearhead of a battle against Sharia Law.

This could prove more than a tad of a problem for Malcolm Wood in his efforts for Farage to ensure EUkip stays totally under Farage‘s control using Malcolm Wood as his strings to work the hapless and ill considered Peer.

May I suggest that whilst Malcolm Wood was writing his love letter to Farage he could perhaps write the rest of Farage’s policies for Pearson as the acceptable face of racism – Don’t confront the issues exacerbate the problems with BNP style incitement based on differentiation of superstitions!

We look forward to hearing from Malcolm Wood what Lord Pearson thinks and having done that no doubt we should note these will be the thoughts of the mallign influence of Farage, ensuring he hangs onto control.


We note that the plight of EUkip is such that the near imbecilic PPC for Harlow The Liar & Cheat Michael McGough managed in an audience and panelists of 22 having travelled any distance, as he is willing to to have his voice heard – from those 22 one interupted McGough’s cringeworthy drivel about how clever he was even to the extent of criticising his sponsors The MEPs of EUkip and the EUkip Press Office for not telling everyone how clever he was!

His performance, badged to EUkip, was so embarrassing that a ‘genuine’ EUkip PPC stating that people hadn’t given up an afternoon to listen to his drivel and another viewed exactly the same sentiment and said he would listen to no more & walked out.

Is it any wonder that EUkip has had to fall back on having EUkip’s reputation dragged further into the gutter by Mark Croucher’s appointment as a spokesman in The EU – how his payment is effected to pretend he isn’t seems imaterial when 3 MEPs (including 2 EUkip) have assured me that he is and now 3 main stream journalists – If it walks like a ………….

Farage must realise just how damaging his stewardship of EUkip has been – as I warned over a dozen years ago Farage may well have built up EUkip but it is clear that he has done this for his own gain and now we see the consequences I predicted coming to roost as he destroys the party by having dishonestly and corruptly seized the leadership.

From Dishonestly and corruptly seizing the leadership when it was supposedly an electoral process he has moved on to a series of placements which made it possible for a claque of low lifes seeking self agrandisement in his glory to carry out witch hunts against loyal members and raise the profile of The BNP such that they astonishingly managed with Farage‘s personal assistance and the aid of Mark Croucher to obtain 2 BNP MEPs to espouse their vile views in EUrope.

Forward the march of the Faragista Fan Club through a series of lies and personalised attacks on loyal supporters and the ever present lies about how Farage had dealt with Tom Wise when in fact all he had ever done was seemingly blackmail Tom Wise into handing over some £5,000 of the money he had fraudulently obtained and by process of Money Laundering through an obfuscated bank account use the stolen money to pay one of Farage‘s personal debts!

In return we can readily assume Tom Wise was given a pay rise and control of his own budget – a privilege denied other EUkip MEPs. In fact unlike the other EUkip MEPs Tom Wise was permitted to appoint his own staff! Currently I understand that Godfrey Bloom would seem to do the bulk of the interviewing and one lady was astonished to be told by the party chairman (puppet though he may be) that he regretted he could not employ her as Nigel Farage made all the appointments!

For the record NIGEL FARAGE DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO EFFECTIVELY CENSURE TOM WISE – Tom Wise not only remained a member of EUkip until March 2009 but also no one ever asked him to resign, furthermore when his membership period ended he was officially asked to renew his membership. In fact in May he was phoned at home and asked to not only renew his membership but also contribute funds to help EUkip in the EU Elections!

It is also interesting to note that Farage has PERSONALLY been responsible for the loss of a donation of £367,000+ and legal costs of well over £1/2Million.

As a leader Farage has lived down to expectation and even now as he seeks desparately to duck out of his responsibilities he is fighting to retain control by placement of a puppet leader of HIS Party which has moved yet another crass step towards living down to the soubriqette of The BNP in blazers with Lord Wakko of Islamaphobia!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Lord Pearson; Malcolm Wood; Malcolm Pearson; Farage; Leadership; Tom Wise; | Leave a Comment »

#692* – SPANISH MEP’s BASIC DISHONESTY SABOTAGES HER

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 31/10/2009

#692* – SPANISH MEP’s BASIC DISHONESTY SABOTAGES HER

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

#692* – SPANISH MEP’s BASIC DISHONESTY SABOTAGES HER FEW BASIC ABILITIES!

Hi,

Marta Andreasen the Spanish MEP’s fundamental dishonesty sabotages what abilities she may have.

In Spain it may be accepted to lie and cheat to become an MEP as Marta Andreasen did. Interestingly unlike Britain (a fraction of the size of Spain)which is broken up into Mickey Mouse Regions of like authority such as London, South West Region, Wales, East Midlands, Scotland or The South East Region; Spain is not broken into such regions and thus has 52 complete unknowns as MEPs none of which would seem to be identifiable to any issue, detail or region thus seemingly they represent no one – in fact a fundamental denial of the claimed aims of the EU since thus Spain perpetuates Nationality!

The Andreasen woman we know to be dishonest and corrupt – she even claims to be a British resident now! That it was orchestrated as a shameful swindle on the electorate and also the members of EUkip – I believe she should be removed from office having obtained office based upon both the dishonesty of abuse of the electoral process and also on the grounds of lies and fraud – as is most clearly shown by the Judgement of The Courts CLICK HERE

Do listen to the lies of Marta Andreasen on BBC Radio 4 Question Time earlier this week:
CLICK HERE

We note once again this woman failed to correct the false introduction that led people to believe she was The EU’s Chief Accountant when she was merely one of many 1,000s of bean counters in The EU – in her case a department under the remit of ONE of the many commissioners.

We note also that she perpetuates the myth that she was in some way a ‘Whistle Blower’ the Judgement shows beyond any reasonable doubt that she WAS NOT a ‘Whistle Blower’, you will know that she made absolutely no traceable comment on the workings of The EU until she had lost her case against being fired for failure of duty.

For more information about this clearly dishonest, obviously duplicitous and completely unreliable woman you might care to read up on further facts CLICK HERE

For the facts behind her employ as a bean counter for The EU it is a sad reflection on the EU that that duplicitous dullard Kinnock failed to check her claims in her CV where she failed to show she had been suspended for 18 months by the OECD where she had previously worked – nor the reasons!

Similarly the corrupt and shoddy journalism of Accountancy Age leaves much to be desired such that one wonders if her husband, with whom she lives in Barcelona, may hold influence as an economist or a share holder CLICK HERE

You may also care to read The EUkip Returning Officer’s recommendations and his statement that she was NOT an eligible candidate for the role of MEP – a position that led Malcolm Lord Pearson into a collusion in conspiracy to corrupt due democratic process to aid Nigel Farage against the best interests of EUkip & indeed Britain CLICK HERE

It does seem an act of staggering stupidity for a man of Lord Pearson’s undoubted talents to have entered into such a corrupt deception – presumably on no more than a pack of fabrications from Farage – this man is clearly without judgement though he may well see Farage for the ill educated unqualified performer he is clearly he has failed to see Farage for the duplicitous self obsessed and under confident chappie he most clearly is and seemingly he has failed to realise that Farage has absolutely no leadership skills past underhand bribery and low cunning.

That Pearson has clearly grasped the fact that Farage is without OQ is clear when he speaks of him or the demeaning way in which he puts him down and tolerates his fawning manner.

The astonnishing thing is that Lord Wakko is seeking to lead EUkip that should just about cap off TheBNP in blazers view of the party, with Lord Wakko of Islamaphobe in thrall!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Andreasen; Marta Andreasen; BBC; Any Questions; | Leave a Comment »

#691* – 28-Oct-09 Has LORD PEARSON ANY INTEREST IN EUkip?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 31/10/2009

#691* – 28-Oct-09 Has LORD PEARSON ANY INTEREST IN EUkip?

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

28-Oct-09 Has LORD PEARSON ANY INTEREST IN EUkip?
IN THE MIDST OF A LEADERSHIP BID HE IS IN AMERICA, LEAVING FARAGE’S DUPLICITOUS PUPPET MALCOLM WOOD AS A SPACE FILLER!

I do feel that since we are supposedly reliably advised that only 2% of the Islamists advocate violence to establish their beliefs in the ascendancy, clearly we should be working with the 98% of peaceful Muslims to build a consensus of care – the problem is that those 98% are all but invisible, more scared of the vile extremist 2% than are we.

We have managed to live alongside Judaism where one could make much the same claim when differentiating between Jews & Zionists – one need only read Deuteronomy 4:35>40ish.

Confronting an enemy with so little understanding of them is a massive downfall of the Pearson doctrine. Even in war fare in Africa we used native trackers and negotiators and I do contend his stance is risky as it stands every chance of alienating the 98% yet failing to deal with the 2% whereas supporting and protecting the beleaguered 98% provides a very ready army of well informed supporters.

Do not forget that it was by dealing with the Pakistanni Muslims of Birmingham that I and a couple of others obtained a ‘Fatwa’ AGAINST suicide bombing and attacks on people in host nations.

When my computer is back to normal I will post the full Fatwa with the signatures of 1,200 Mullahs.

When cattle stampede on the open range only an idiot would confront them and try to stop them – the wise and the experienced will work either to turn them and keep turning them until the mill or drive them into a blind gulch.

Just as we have worked with the 98% of decent Jews and built trust and bridges whe have been able to seriously damage the vile Zionist extremists. We should do the same with Muslims, work with the moderate 98% who are currently intimidated by the extremist 2%.

For those who wish to understand a little more of Islam you will note I have listed in the right sidebar both FITNA CLICK HERE & an electronic version of The Quran CLICK HERE in your choice of languages.

Perhaps at the hustings Malcolm Wood could let us all know just what Malcolm Pearson plans to do to get these United Kingdoms out of The EU – as without leaving The EU he can blather on pointlessly about Islam or Education, Language or Law but not one word has any value since 80% of our laws are imposed by The EU and enacted into law by rubber stamping at Westminster without consideration of their efficacy or benefit to Britain.

Do note two small details – the balance 20% of law enacted MUST be compliant with EU Law.

Do read article II Section II of The ECA which clearly states that the Minister concerned MUST act as the Quissling of The EU and must enact the law either by statutory instrument or order in council!

It is for this reason that more law is passed without debate during the summer recess than in the qhole of Parliament’s sittings for a year!

How does Lord Pearson Malcolm Wood seek to address this embarrassing question when he realises that for all the pose and prattle he can not influence who crosses our borders and what religion or superstition they may have!

Of more immediate concern to EUkip members is EXACTLY how does he believe that Nigel Farage has stitched EUkip up with a GUILTY verdict and £3/4Million of debt and how would he have avoided this had he been leader at the time?

How does he feel that NO action of consequence was EVER taken regarding Tom Wise who is in Court at Southwark Crown Court at 10:00hrs. 02-Nov-2009 with his co-conspirator Lindsay Jenkins – Unlike Farage who did nothing even letting him remain in EUkip until March 2009 when Wise refused to renew his membership. What would Pearson have done differently? Was Farage wrong to tell lies to the media live on air?

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip;UKIP; Leadership; Malcolm Wood; Lord Pearson; Islam; Muslim; | 1 Comment »

#690* – Has Malcolm Lord Pearson STOOD DOWN?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/10/2009

#690* – Has Malcolm Lord Pearson STOOD DOWN?

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Has Malcolm Lord Pearson STOOD DOWN AS A EUkip LEADERSHIP CANDIDATE?!

Hi,

Increasingly it looks as if Lord Pearson has stood down and been replaced by Malcolm Wood – Malcolm Wood has been proven duplicitous and dishonest having lied to members and lied about supporters – rigged meetings, betrayed committee decisions and colluded in corruption of EUkip for money.

We note that Malcolm Wood has now usurped Lord Pearson’s role as a leadership candidate – not I guess that that matters much since both will clearly do EXACTLY what Farage tells them to as they have done for many years.

Malcolm Wood clearly wrote the sick making love letter to Farage, which made Malcolm Pearson look like a complete plonker. Malcolm Wood is answering questions as if he was Malcolm Pearson on the EUkip love in Forum which is now so heavily censored as to be no more than a joke thanks to EUkip’s legal advisors Ma Zucherman of Bent & Manure whose advice it seems was given that has now caused EUkip a £3/4Million debt and subject to a Guilty verdict.

Why doesn’t Pearson write his own replies – Eton can surely not have left him illiterate! Who cares what Malcolm Wood believes? Malcolm Wood will just do exactly what Farage demands.

Many will remember Malcolm Wood’s South West Committee decided to demand the de-selection of Gawain Towler despite the assurances of Elizabeth Burton that all men get erections in nice warm water – not a view subscribed to by Towler’s wife as she stated on her web site and it was we understand a matter of great fascination to their daughter! Towler also considered it apposite to relay his perverse sexual activities on his blog bringing EUkip into obvious disrepute – postings that whatever his sexual obsessions would have been equally damaging!

Gawain Towler was de-selected on the Friday by, we understand, a unanimous decision of the committee he had been selected to serve. On the Monday, as I recall the political committee of EUkip met and UNANIMOUSLY reselected him in complete disregard for the democratic process or the wishes of the members! It is interesting to note that we are officially advised that EUkip’s Political Committee does not keep minutes and as Paul Nuttall has assured people in public acting as Farage’s unelected puppet chairman of EUkip – The Political Committee IS Nigel Farage!

Do EUkip really want such a debased and dishonest man as Malcolm Wood as leader as clearly a vote for Lord Pearson will ensure Malcolm Wood leads the party for Farage – Lord Pearson is far too busy to lead the party it is clear and as even Malcolm Wood admitted he only took the duty of standing because his arm was twisted!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Pederasty; Perversion; Judgement; Malcolm Wood; Pearson; Leadership; | Leave a Comment »

#689* – WHY IS THE WEST NOT MAKING ALLIES OF MODERATE MUSLIMS?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/10/2009

#689* – WHY IS THE WEST NOT MAKING ALLIES OF MODERATE MUSLIMS?

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

WHY IS THE WEST NOT MAKING ALLIES OF MODERATE MUSLIMS & DISTANCING ITSELF FROM EXTREMIST CULTS?

Hi,

in an attempt to understand the seeming determination of EUkip to destroy itself what with a series of deliberate decisions to confront and aggrivate the authorities when they had absolutely no case for a defence and having escalated a correctable error, when offered aid by The Electoral Commission, to escalate that to a debt of £3/4Million can only be seen as delibersta as surely, stupid as they are, they were advised of the dangers.

That said I note the front runner for leadership of EUkip is Malcolm Lord Pearson of Rannock aka Farage’s fixer Malcolm Wood (since Malcolm Pearson is clearly out of touch with EUkip).

Entering >”Malcolm Pearson”+”anti Islam””Lord Pearson”+”anti Muslim”< 633 are shown enetering my name 7 & 4 present. Based upon name alone which presents 10 times as many results for Pearson as I one would have hoped he would have clocked up a mere 70 at most!

I incline to agree with Alan Wood when he says: “I do not approve of Lord Pearson’s intended election strategy of making “the threat of radical Islam the major focus”. This is the wrong approach to winning an election. It will automatically make UKIP candidates unelectable for its negative ‘hate’ message. Radical Christian Tony Blair, who went to war in Iraq on a lie and helped to kill thousands of innocent civilians, might be a better target. Let me make it clear that if Lord Pearson is elected as Party Leader I will leave the party after 13 years of service. He will lead us into the wilderness.

I was amused to see a post of mine from Feb. 2006 registered which was remarkably prescient some 3.1/2 years later in a flux situation.

 Old 11-02-2006, 02:59 AM
#13 (permalink)
Greg Lance-Watkins
Banned (FOR TELLING THE TRUTH!!!)

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Web Cam behind your screen – Smile
Posts: 838
Greg Lance-Watkins

Hi,


this was predicted as the next move quite a while back.


At this moment Tiny Blur is positioning an army of other people’s sons in Afghanistan effectively confronting Islam in Iran and Pakistan prepared for what may well be escalated to a nuclear confrontation to confirm the status of the US Dollar as the reserve currency of choice.


Intel is undecided at this moment whether a incident in EUrope or Israel would best suit their purposes.


Some 30 mullahs were briefed in mostly in Italy from whence we can trace about 12 who went shortly after the Haj INTO phpbb_the Middle East via Egypt with a selection of some anti Islamic cartoons, some from the batch published last September but with many more drawn and added.


Seemingly this was to incite the diaspora to prepare them for attack from America either direct or utilising Israel for a first strike.


Matthew I coucil caution not because I disagree with you but because it is never wise to swim in muddy water in the presence of crocodiles!


Such caution will serve you well – never confront an enemy if you do not know his strength, the ground on which you fight or the willingness of reserves to conjoin.


Choose your ground and know your enemy – this is one of the first forays of the third world war – beware and remember Sarajevo! Be minded that Israel has placed Hamas in the ascendancy!
EUkip; UKIP; Lord Pearson; Islam; Judaism; Zionism; Extremists; Moderates; Perversions;

Regards,
Greg
Greg Lance-Watkins is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

One is forced to wonder why someone who is in some other ways not unintelligent, might seemingly seek confrontation with Islam – a concept which is foolish in the extreme.

The huge majority of Muslims, not only in Britain and the West but in their own original Countries are if anything more frightened of extreme Islam than we could ever be. Just as decent Jews are disgusted by the behaviour of the Zionists particularly their bellicose manner in Palestine – which clearly risks war on an unprecedented scale yet decent folk are brow beaten into praise of their disgusting behaviour.

None are more intimidated by the mad Mullahs than decent Muslims nor of Zionism than decent Jews. It is worth remembering the obscene fanaticism of Zionist Jewry when rather than lose the Zionists marched their entire peoples off of the cliff at Massada and was not Solomon the first recorded suicide terrorist killing himself and 3,000 jews in the Temple – yet rather than reveile this disgusting act Zionists venerate him and his actions.

Be minded that Zionism has in place the David Plan for anihillation if they are not granted their evil wishes. Is it Malcolm Lord Pearson’s aim to confront Zionism in defence of decent Jews both in Palestine and around the world or does he solely aim to antagonise the extremists of Islam to bring a reign of terror on decent Muslims.

We have seen the danger of overly pandering to Political Correctness and falling in the Frankfurt Schhols overt Communist trap – aided by our enemies in the hard left of politics with The Fabians, ANL, Common, Purpose, Critical Theory, Searchlight, control beyond authority, ALF, the moral majority, the Rowntree trust, UAF, and the entire metissage of our society seeking its destruction and the birth of Communism in a New World Order of Global Governance – so clearly aided by the scum of EU politics.

No wonder decent moderate Jews and Muslims – both largely Semites – fear the retribution of the west far less than the evil of their own extremists.

The over pandering to perversion in this Country is as we have seen all too starkly in Liverpool, in recent days, is leading to the bad old days of beating up homosexuals ‘pandering’ in public toilets – gay they are not but legal they are. The extremists of the Frankfurt School’s construct ‘Stonewall’ will drive us back to those bad old days in their attempt to undermine and destroy the values of western civilisation.

That our SS and Family Courts have children’s homes running over with children seeking homes yet they fail on all counts to effect their adoption we note that almost 50% of all under age prostitutes are in the care of the state and over 80% of all indiginous prisoners were at some stage in care as children – clearly the left wing state is catastrophic as a parent yet of the lower middle class decent parents from whom they seize children like Anthony & Debbie Syms and the Franklins in Plymouth (I can tell you no more about them as I am under an injunction so that what seems to be the criminality of Doctors, The Courts, The County and The SS can it seems be hidden by a corrupt cloak of secrecy).

Of the children seized under secrecy orders from loving caring families 96% are adopted as it seems they target attractive children! It is hard to meet the quota with children with a hunted look, incontinent from sodomy, covered in burns and with broken bones – such homes are also harder to deal with!

Just where is EUkip heading having forgotten, it seems, that it was actively promoted to get Britain OUT of the EU not as some childish inept political party to enrich a chosen few!

Malcolm Wood has clearly proved himself untrustworthy and duplicitous – not above outright dishonesty and betrayal of UKIP members, he is no leader for EUkip and clearly he has been provided by Farage to keep Pearson on as Farage’s puppet – either that or as his brain cell!

A risk not beyond the stupidity of some in EUkip with their fear of race, religion, creed and colour and their allegiance with some of the most vile extremists in EU politics from the anti Jewish Greek contingent through racism, xenophobia and hunting out perverts with violent intent to all but their own!

I note when the statement of Pearson’s stance on Islam was made in The Telegraph there was absolutely no sign of a convincing rebuttal in even the letters column.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Lord Pearson; Islam; Judaism; Zionism; Extremists; Moderates; Perversions; | Leave a Comment »

#688* – EUkip STILL HAS ITS LOVERS – TOO BLINDED TO CHECK THE FACTS!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 28/10/2009

#688* – EUkip STILL HAS ITS LOVERS – TOO BLINDED TO CHECK THE FACTS!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

EUkip STILL HAS ITS LOVERS – TOO BLINDED TO CHECK THE FACTS! IAIN DALE CLEARLY IS BLINDED!

UKIP Stares into a Financial Abyss
Iain Dale 4:22 PM
UKIP has been denied the right to appeal to the Supreme Court over the £363,000 fine over the illegal donation by Alan Bown. It seems astonishing that the Court of Appeal would make this decision. UKIP must now make a direct appeal to the Supreme Court or face financial ruin. I say this with no relish at all, as the punishment in this case does not fit the crime. If a UKIPballs type rescue fund is set up, I suspect a lot of non UKIP voters will put their hands in their pockets.


As Michael Crick has blogged, the LibDems will also be shifting uneasily in their seats at this decision, as it could them next. They face having to pay back £2.4 million over the donation from convicted fraudster Michael Brown.

I have responded on Mrs. Dale’s Diary!
He would seem to be in love!

Hi,


One wonders who is the sloppier Journalist Michael Crick with his lazy and completely unchecked article blinded by his clever realisation that the names Bown and Brown were similar – for that is where the similarity between The series of decisions made by EUkip to antagonise and insult The Electoral Commission and our Courts based on crass advice.


Then of course the Lib.Dims. were not so dim – be minded that when EUkip accepted the donation from Bown & his company neither were legitimately registered and when EUkip were clearly advised and subsequently requested by El.Com. to regularise the position by returning the money to Mr. Bown on arrangement to receive it back from him or from a legitimate company he owned.


Phone calls, ‘e’Mails, letters and face to face meetings from El.Com to try to cajole this simple adjustment but EUkip made a series of daft, perverse and utterly idiotic decisions to ensure the authorities had absolutely no choice but to take the matter all the way incrementally granting EUkip solutions.


Strange that Brown’s donation was made by a legitimately registered company which was trading and registered as the Lib.Dims. due diligence established – right down to checking with the bankers to ensure both legitimacy and sufficient funds.


I understand they had the monies held in escrow until the matter was lodged with El.Com. and effectively OKd.


You will note that it was subsequent to the legitimate due diligence and clearance that the authorities locked the dealings of 5th. Avenue etc.


The Lib.Dims. unlike EUkip did all they could to assist the authorities even providing duplicates of all documents required to the authorities and it could be argued that the documentation they supplied have aided the authorities to obtain convictions of what seems to be a Ponzi scheme run by Brown.


Which was the sloppiest journalist?
Michael Crick for his indolent article without checking the facts or those journalists who with stars in their eyes did little more than copy him.


EUkip has incurred a #3/4Million debt by making a series of deliberate decisions related to an illegal donation made by an unregistered company and by an unregistered individual.


The Lib.Dims. carried out due diligence to the satisfaction of the El.Com. on a donation from a company legitimately registered which was SUBSEQUENTLY found to be fraudulently mismanaged.


That EUkip has been spared making yet another ridiculous decision to enrich the lawyers by the Courts showing there were no grounds on which to appeal (Courts don’t fall for sympathy propaganda being clearly more responsible than journalists).


This is just yet another example of the incompetence of EUkip’s leadership team as they could not have acted more stupidly and look where they have landed the party!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Iain Dale; Michael Crick; ElCom Verdict; ElCom Appeal Refused; | Leave a Comment »

#687* – Mark CROUCHER & The BDF EXPOSED AS DAMAGING EUkip

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 27/10/2009

#687* – Mark CROUCHER & The BDF EXPOSED AS DAMAGING EUkip

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Mark CROUCHER, Brendan PADMORE & OTHERS USE  The BDF TO LIE & BULLY as EXPOSED & ARE DAMAGING EUkip!

Hi,

At the time and date Croucher’s faked ‘e’Mail was made and published on Anthony Butcher’s corrupt web site, controlled by dishonest individuals such as the EUkip chairman Paul Nuttall and his staff – both paid and unpaid, seeking preferment, John West had not received any monies from what was called the defence fund.
Regardless of the malicious and all too frequently dishonest and childish taunting and twisting claims and inferences of such as Mark Croucher his incubi and succubae, Brendan Padmore, Michael McGough and various cowards too ashamed to put their name to their postings.

Usually Croucher is quite good with his weasel words and computer fakes and set ups.

May I point out that he has shot himself in the foot by attributing the time line on TWO counts.

Firsty this item does not provide proof of anything relative to the point he is trying to make, it is a mere snap shot, taken out of context to try to prove matters long subsequent.

Secondly he has categorically stated the posting from West was made on the 18th. Feb 2009 – Croucher has foolishly failed to recognise that the thread he attributes this to was locked on the 17th. Feb 2009.

It is noted that Brendan Padmore is wriggling and squirming to supply ways to support the duplicitous and untrustworthy Mark Croucher a vile little failure of a man without honour, integrity or morality and proven on substantive matters to be both a liar and a cheat. Brendan Padmore yet again displays his dishonestyas he desparately tries to do as he is told by EUkip to suppress the truth.

I note the moderator CSteam would seem to have the measure of Croucher and comments ‘he has not received the screen capture’ Croucher CLAIMS to have the implication being that he is somewhat smarter than Padmore and does not trust the false evidence provided by Croucher. To comment the item has not arrived would indicate it was requested!

Here is the posting that shows Croucher’s dishonesty – but we can expect weasel words to try to wriggle out of the facts from him once he realises he has been exposed.

The bottom line is that Croucher CLAIMS to have evidence of a statement made by John West which somehow proves 8 months later that subsequent to the 18th.Feb 2009 John West did or did not get money from some private source or other!

This is no more than vexatious and spitefull mischief making of absolutely no relevance to the fact that there are those who have proved beyond doubt that there is every possibility that upwards of £10 Million may well have been industrially skimmed from UKIP by the corrupt individuals who have dishonestly and corruptly seized control of the party.

It is appreciated that as an official spokesman for EUkip, from time to time, and as a serial liar there is every reason to believe that Croucher is being used yet again to try to muddy the waters so as to shelter the undeniable lies, corruption and dishonesty of EUkip and its leadership.

You will note a poster ‘Barboo’ forensically exposes the dishonesty and duplicity of Mark Croucher.

First here is Croucher’s unsound claim followed by Barboo’s detailed evidence.

23-10-2009, 02:06 PM
#641 (permalink)

Mark Croucher


Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dartford, Kent


Posts: 1,643


——————————————————————————–


Sorry, I would have posted this in the proper complaints thread, but West ensured it wandered so far off topic that the thread was closed. I’m hoping all interested can find it here. It was posted on the 18th February 2009 and the time looks like 4:32pm, but as it was a screen print and the date and time text is in reversed print, it hasn’t come out very well on my printer. The significance of the date was that it was after his case was thrown out at Ipswich court as an abuse of the court process, which was the only reason I printed it. You may recall there was a whole load of threads which were deleted at that time. To put it into context, I was mocking West’s non-existent legal advice and pointing out that any competent firm of solicitors would have told him the correct court to file his case with, and had suggested that the defence fund money was wasted. I don’t have all of my original post – just the last few lines of it, but I distinctly remember it.


Quote:


Originally Posted by johnwest

I have not received a penny from any fund. You are a liar. You do not need to worry about my legal advice as Nigel and his cabal will find out how good my legal team is soon enough when certain other matters come to court as this is just the starting point. Already a national newspaper is interested and there will be more to come so you can mock now but your boss wont be pleased when the full story comes out and you will be laughing on the other side of your face when your corruption is exposed.

So put that in your pipe and smoke it, West. And stop abusing the complaints system for your own ends: you know you said it, everybody else knows you said it, and yet you make a complaint after thinking that nobody had a copy of your comments. I’m surprised the moderators don’t ban you for being such a glib onanist and making such a blatantly false complaint.

One wonders what Croucher has put in his pipe and smoked to be so damaging to what personality he may have had!

Barboo’s statement shows Croucher for what he is:

Yesterday, 05:18 PM
#647 (permalink)

Barboo
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 597

——————————————————————————–

Quote:


Originally Posted by B.A.Ware


Thread re-opened as MC has provided his evidence.

Where is this evidence, BA? Have you retrieved a deleted thread and found John West’s alleged statement? Can we see it, please, because what Mark Croucher has provided so far is an embellishment of his existing claim which does not stand up to scrutiny. It is not ‘evidence’.


Mark Croucher informed us at post #592 of this thread So what did happen to the defence fund money? that John West’s alleged statement, “I have not received a penny from any fund” was in a posting on a deleted thread http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip…tml#post613761


Clicking on that link from #592 brings up an ‘invalid thread’ page, the full address of which shows that the deleted thread MC referred to was entitled ‘Judge dismisses West case as abuse of small claims process’.


Mark Croucher enlarged on this at #641 of this thread by giving the date and time of John West’s alleged post on the deleted thread as 18 February 2009, 4:32pm, and saying, “To put it into context, I was mocking West’s non-existent legal advice and pointing out that any competent firm of solicitors would have told him the correct court to file his case with, and had suggested that the defence fund money was wasted”.


The problem with this is, the thread ‘Judge dismisses West case as abuse of small claims process’ was deleted on 17 February, as Mark Croucher himself complained at the time he started a new thread to replace it, so John West could not have made the alleged posting on the 18th. The sequence of events can be checked as follows:


In the Complaints section (P.25) at 02:11pm on 17 February, John West reported a post Reported Post by johnwest Mark Croucher had made to the thread ‘Judge dismisses West case as abuse of small claims process’, on the grounds that MC had given a link to a blog which had published what JW claimed to be an untrue version of his court case.


At 4:18pm on 17 February Mark Croucher started a new thread So now we can’t talk about John Wests court case being dismissed?, in which he referred to the previous thread as having being deleted, and restored the blog link.


At 07:43pm on 17 February John West made a further complaint Reported Post by johnwest saying, “Despite complaining about Mark Croucher’s original posting I now see that he been allowed to repeat the allegations under a new title . . . . What is the point of removing a thread if you then allow the allegations to be repeated by the same person using a new thread?” Following this, moderator B.A.Ware allowed the new thread to remain open but removed the link to the offending blog.


Also, it was at post #3 of this complaint that John West made what is so far his only proven comment on the funding of his legal action: “I also noticed that in one of Mark Croucher’s posts he accuses Geoffrey Collier of helping to fund my legal action. This is also not true”. Geoffrey Collier has since confirmed at #464 of this thread that JW’s statement was correct.


The new thread ‘So now we can’t talk about John Wests court case being dismissed?’ continued and Mark Croucher did make the mocking comments about John West’s legal advice that he describes above, but his barbs (at #23, #30 and #67) were aimed at Geoffrey Collier, not John West. JOHN WEST DID NOT CONTRIBUTE AT ALL TO THIS THREAD so, despite all his spinning, Mark Croucher has still not provided the evidence of John West’s alleged statement required by the moderators.


Will you repost it, please, if you have found such evidence in a now deleted thread that forum members can no longer access?

It is worthy of note that the thread Mark Croucher relies upon was started by Croucher as another malicious and spitefull thread to attack someone (John West) seeking to expose the truth of the corruption of EUkip.

The interesting FACT is that the thread was locked because of the undeniable FACT that Mark Croucher had in contempt of Court attributed a comment to a Judge firstly which was never made and was thus a lie and a libel a fact compounded by the fact he attributed the comment to a Judge who was absent from the court and had NOT attended The Court concerned.

The thread was locked because Mark Croucher had lied – yet again and for malicious purposes. This being not just a misrepresentation but and outright lie.

Interestingly Brendan Padmore in a desparate attempt to aid Croucher in his dishonesty again fails to seek the truth and makes the utterly implausible claim that he remembers the details of a posting from 18th. Feb 2009 – a posting we have shown beyond doubt did not exist and even if it had provides Croucher and his little help mate Padmore with no substantiation of their claims merely substantiation they are dishonest and untrustworthy.

I once again state that beyond any doubt, however Croucher his incubi & succubae may seek to rewrite facts to suit themselves – John West at no stage in time received a single penny piece as cash or cheque, nor any other sum of money, from the so called defence fund, Niall Warry or myself towards ANY legal costs he may have incurred in seeking to expose the corruption of EUkip nor UKIP nor any individual therein – either for past cases, current cases or ongoing cases. There was NEVER an intent to fund his costs, particularly in the light of the Sanders findings!

I can also confirm that none nor any donors to the fund in question have voiced or made any complaint as to the handling of the fund, and having spoken to all the donors known to me all bar one has stated they were entirely happy with the handling, were aware of the dishonest implications of Croucher and have offered further monies if required.

I trust Junius will post this on their blog at:
CLICK HERE

– where it will be more readily noticed than on
CLICK HERE
where although there is good traction and it is regularly read by the media and many others there is a great deal more factual data and it may be ‘swamped’ but it will be posted there eventually.

Please be so good as to pass this ‘e’Mail on or post it on your blog or web site if you can – it is important not only to expose the truth but to stand united against the dishonesty of EUkip and their vile little fixers and smearers. So redollent of Cultural Marxism and the smears of The Frankfurt School, Common Purpose, Searchlight, Fabianism and other such ‘soft communist’ organisations mainly of the extreme nihilism of the vexatious left of politics.

If you require further facts or clarification please do not hesitate to contact me.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; BDF; Dishonesty; Anthony Butcher; Brendan Padmore; Barboo; Cultural Marxism; Politically Correct; Mark Croucher; Croucher; | Leave a Comment »

#686* – UPDATES ~ #684* – Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/10/2009

#686* – UPDATES ~ #684* – Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK – Leadership Candidate!
OR
Is it just a love letter from Malcolm WOOD!!

Hi,

I was most interested to visit Lord Pearsons leadership web site at CLICK HERE

The very first line tells us much:
The full site will be live very shortly but in the meantime here is my manefesto…

does this explain much of his fear of Islam? He has a manefesto where many would have a manifesto – perhaps he is a Buddist – Ommmmmmm Maneeeee Festooooo Ommmmmmmm!

UPDATED and altered to ‘Manifesto’ after this web site pulled the leg of Malcolm WOOD who we understand is befouling Malcolm Pearson’s campaign.


Sadly Malcolm Wood has a long track record of dishonesty and duplicity, which I can only hope will harm Pearson’s campaign.

It does look very much as if Wood wrote this sick making love letter to Farage & it is clear that Pearson, who has little clue of what goes on in EUkip as if you only get your news from one source it is clear you have little balance to your knowledge.

I have read many of Lord Pearson’s speeches and this just does not read like his thinking – I do not believe he would stoop to such sick making language and he is always very patronising to Farage treating him as the upstart and mocking him – Pearson being an educated and urbane individual is well able to make remarks that pass clean over the head of such as Farage.

The list of proposers is fairly sickenning too – it lacks the humanity Pearson would have brought to it had he ‘rigged’ it himself – it just smacks of no change there then!

Finally on authorship I really do not believe Lord Pearson would have done something as totally infra dig as to publish the childish weenie waggling list of look at me and howmany people I didn’t need! He just isn’t that insecure!

Can we be sure this isn’t the list sold to the BNP?

You only need to read the list of supporters to know that if Farage does manage to put him on his throne – it will just be more of the same, as EUkip slides ever further into the gutter as a vehicle of Farage’s personal lack of Officer Qualities, integrity and failed leadership – So very sad when you consider just how much Farage had to offer before personal gain took over and the party was destroyed.

Embarrassing as Alan Wood may find it, I totally agree with him, he has hit the nail on the head with his opening statement in his leadership bid:

“I do not approve of Lord Pearson’s intended election strategy of making “the threat of radical Islam the major focus”. This is the wrong approach to winning an election. It will automatically make UKIP candidates unelectable for its negative ‘hate’ message. Radical Christian Tony Blair, who went to war in Iraq on a lie and helped to kill thousands of innocent civilians, might be a better target. Let me make it clear that if Lord Pearson is elected as Party Leader I will leave the party after 13 years of service. He will lead us into the wilderness.


Our enemy is the EU and I will have a ‘Manifesto for Government’ of the British for the British.


Most importantly, the anti-EU parties in UK have to work together rather than splinter the vote. I am already in discussion with others outside of UKIP to explore where all anti-EU people other than BNP can work together for the benefit of the ’cause’. The BNP have hijacked the anti-EU cause and we have to show the people affected by EU immigration policies that its the EU and not ethnicity or religion which is the problem.”


You can phone me on 07748 197 996 – 8am – 10pm only please.


UKIP LEADERSHIP ELECTION 2009


CANDIDATE – ALAN STEPHEN WOOD CEng MSc MIMechE

I completely agree with Alan Wood and totally repudiate the Islamaphobia of the statement attributed to Malcolm Pearson.

Does Pearson, like Farage’s other chumps & partners, take the extreme xenophobic position of advocating burning the possessions of immigrants and bombing and machinegunning boats with Africans in them? I appreciate that Batten has been heard regularly to say that Lega Nord don’t go as far as he would like them to.

Is Malcolm Pearson similar in his views and believes in some form of ‘ethnic style’ cleansing to erradicate perverts who have perfectly legal sexual perversions or take the stance of extreme anti Judaism of EUkip’s Greek chums?

As leader will Lord Pearson embrace these ghastly extremists of the EFD Pan EU Political Party group that EUkip has embraced or will he order Farage to act honourably and decently?

As leader will Lord Pearson fire David Bannerman for his dishonesty and cheating?

As leader will Lord Pearson get rid of the utterly discreditted cheat Marta Andreasen?

As leader will he publicly censure Farage for his dishonesty regarding Tom Wise?

As leader will he distance the party from people like Douglas Denny, Mark Croucher, Michael McGough, Andrew Smith, Peter Reeve and the others who do so much damage to the reputation of the party with their dishonesty and corrupt behaviour?

No I didn’t think so – Just more gutter politics from EUkip for the personal gain of a small claque and the cabal!

I was amused at the sloppy proof reading and I see SteveReed is now an MEP as is Katie Bloom Howden (wasn’t that a member of Godfrey’s family he pays?), on that basis I was surprised not to see Lady Caroline.

In that Malcolm wood has made it very clear Farage’s puppet didn’t want to be leader but to use his own terminology had his arm twisted – I wonder howmany of the assentors felt they had their arm twisted and would much rather not have been on the rather embarrassing list – in fact one wonders howmany would far rather not be associated at all with the Islamaphobia, anti Jewish, racist and sexually intollerant policies Malcolm clearly espouses having so foulsomely praised his super hero.

Does Malcolm Lord Pearson of Rannoch also put his name to the financial corruption or will he order forensic accounting to ascertain where the money has vanished and who should be forced to resign for their deliberate decision to abuse the Courts and statutory bodies leading to the clear Guilty verdict and a £3/4M. debt?

Anyway Malcolm Wood continues to say:


Personal Statement from Lord Pearson of Rannoch


Although I understood his reasoning, I deeply regretted Nigel’s decision to step down as leader. Sadly my efforts to get him to change his mind, publicly at the conference and privately, have been to no avail.


I had to think long and hard before putting my own name forward to lead UKIP. I knew that were my bid successful, I would be committing to an indefinite period of hard work and would have to forgo directorships and other interests. However I also realised that any sacrifice would be trivial compared to those made by Nigel Farage over nearly two decades. Dauntingly, I would also find myself successor to the most eloquent politician in the land.


Initially I declined to volunteer because I lacked ambition to lead a political party. But I believe passionately in my country and in the democracy and freedom which so many generations have fought to win and defend, often at terrible cost, all now being sold out by a selfish and deluded generation of gutless professional politicians.


In the end it was the sheer persistence of many UKIP members and donors who said that it was my duty to offer myself to my country’s service. I suppose that is arm-twisting UKIP style!


So what can I offer you?


Perhaps I should start by telling you what I am not. In a party with 13 MEPs I am not an elected politician. You must consider whether that is or is not a virtue. It does mean that I am available in this country, without the continual distraction of continental travel. Certainly I am well placed by my seat in the House of Lords to articulate our case. It is, of course, Westminster where these great issues must eventually be decided.


That I am not a professional politician may be no disadvantage in an age when our political class is widely despised. My background is in international insurance. I would like to think that habits such as delegation, training and financial discipline might be useful in the necessary reorganisation of a party whose power and influence has outgrown its infrastructure.


There is one particular area where I feel I should be able to contribute usefully. With the likely implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, these are perilous days. We are desperately short of time if we are to save our great country. This means we have to rapidly recruit and train a large force of people dedicated to national survival. To this end we need to cast a broad net and my contacts with the wider Eurorealist movement could prove very valuable. Along with David Willoughby de Broke in the Lords, as well as through my activities with Global Britain, I can lay some claim to having rare contacts throughout the movement. I hope that I enjoy some respect from people as politically diverse as Lords Stoddart and Tebbit and with others less well known but with considerable financial assets and patriotic dedication. As far as I know, I have no enemies within UKIP and remain on good terms with many who have left us.


What of my political philosophy? I am essentially interested in conserving the British constitution against all who threaten it, most particularly from those “Traitors within the Gate”, the British politicians who have betrayed their own people.


It is rare for a new party to survive long in British politics. UKIP has stood that test of time and changed the political agenda singlehandedly. Our recent success must now be turned to maximum advantage.


We must develop the quality of our candidates and activists. This requires training, with experienced campaigners helping those who have yet to cut their political teeth. This has to be backed up by activity manuals and informative literature. As someone who has provided (I hope useful) publications such as “What is the point of the European Union?” and “BETTER OFF OUT” I may have something to offer here.


We have speak to the British people in straightforward language. Against the background of the country’s financial crisis, we must show how leaving the EU is positive, invigorating, vastly enriching; in short everything to be welcomed and absolutely nothing to be feared. Hand in glove with this goes the promotion of binding national and local referendums. Only thus can power be returned to the people from the political class in Westminster and Brussels.


UKIP policies should be short and incisive and targeted to emphasise what can only be achieved by leaving the EU. They should also be selected to embarrass the old parties by showing how their political correctitude has left them out of touch with the basic common sense of real people. Examples abound: Their refusal to entrust us with education vouchers or to insist on work permits for foreigners; their failure to maintain our borders and their appeasement of militant Islam.


My ambition is for UKIP to do well enough in the General Election to trigger a revolutionary realignment of British politics. In place of our current ‘one party state’, with all the older parties blindly deferring to the EU, we desperately need a new and genuine Opposition. Already many Conservative MPs and most of their activists are with us. Many decent Labour and Lib Dem supporters are also getting the point.


Our priority, which cannot be overstated, must be to maintain our aim of an amicable divorce from the European Union. My slogan is “Friendship and Free Trade only.” Anything and everything we do must be directed to this end and nothing must compromise this objective.


We now have a growing majority of the British people who share this view and a monopoly, amongst the moderate political parties, in expressing it. This is an electoral gold mine.


I shall feel honoured and humbled if you elect me to lead what is the noblest cause in British politics today. But whoever is elected can rely on my full support.


Malcolm Pearson


Biography.


Lord Pearson of Rannoch was born in 1942 and educated at Eton.


In 1964 he founded the PWS Group of international insurance brokers, which went public in 1984 and was sold to the THB Group in 2008. He is now Hon. President but is willing to sacrifice that position should he become leader of UKIP.


During 1975-82 he was the main protagonist in the “Savonita Affair” at Lloyd’s of London, when his refusal to collect a fraudulent claim led to reform at Lloyd’s, and a new Act of Parliament.


From 1984-90 he actively promoted freedom in the Soviet Union through financial and other assistance to dissident groups.


In the period 1983-92 he represented commerce on the Council for National Academic Awards, Britain’s largest degree awarding body, which validated the courses in our Polytechnics (Universities since 1992). He joined with Baroness Cox and others in fighting far left control of Teacher Training, Social and Media Studies, etc.


In 1984 he founded the Rannoch Charitable Trust, which has funded such things as refugees from Communism in Europe, various human rights initiatives, research into British state education, the environment of the Scottish Highlands, free market economics and Islamic fundamentalism.


In 1990 Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher raised him to the Peerage.


During 1991-97 he led several successful amendments in the Lords on Scottish environmental legislation.


In 1992 he received an Honorary Doctorate (of Laws) from Council of National Academic Awards, for services to Higher Education.


During 1992-96 he was a Member of the House of Lords Select Committee on the European Union, which led him to become a leading exponent of the case for the UK to leave the European Union.


In 1992 he became Hon. President of RESCARE – The National Society for Mentally Handicapped People in Residential Care, a subject where he has family experience.


In 1998 he joined with Lord Harris of High Cross (Independent) and Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Labour) to found “Global Britain”, a non-party think tank, to research alternatives to UK membership of the European Union. (See http://www.globalbritain.org )


In 2004 he lost the Conservative whip for suggesting that people should lend their vote to the UK Independence Party, in elections to the European Parliament, and now sits in the Lords, along with Lord Willoughby de Broke, as a UKIP peer.


His many speeches can be found on http://www.lordswhips.org.uk/


His belief in freedom of speech and disregard of controversy was illustrated in 2009 when he invited the Dutch MP, Geert Wilders, to show his anti-Islamist film, “Fitna”, in a press conference at the House of Lords. When Mr. Wilders was banned by the Home Secretary from entering the UK, Lord Pearson went ahead with the film and accused the British Government of appeasing Islamism. (Google: “Fitna” and “Geert Wilders”).


For many years he has been an articulate critic of the institutional pro EU bias of the BBC and has personally invested in research, proving the case much to their discomfiture.


Lord Pearson’s Web Site CLICK HERE will be available in the
near future.

Let us hope he does not fall foul of ‘The Firm’ and have Her Majesty speaking out in The News of The World against him for having seized her flag as his banner – she has seized on Griffin and his having chosen Winston Churchill and The Spitfire as a theme which EUkip thought was so good that they copied the idea!

I wonder if Her Majesty had been aware that the liar and cheat David Bannerman had visually tried to imply some similarity to Churchill, or the part trying to use the symbolism of TheBNP which seems increasingly accurate as EUkip allies itself with the most extreme of racist xenophobes, anti Jewish, violent sexually intollerant bigots that membership of their new Pan EU Political Party group could muster.

We must wait to see if Pearson knows ANYTHING about EUkip or just the lies of Farage and if all goes to plan he can stand down after the General Election if Farage gets elected he can hand the party to David Bannerman to continue the destruction or back to Farage if he fails at Buckingham to fulfill his ambitions.

Meanwhile let us see at what stage EUkip is abandonned and the new Pan EU Party takes over, as posted in my other blog!

Lord Pearson makes a good patsy to carry forward Farage’s ambitions.

ASSENTORS for LORD PEARSON OF RANNOCH

Lord Pearson would like to thank all the many members who offered to assent to his nomination.
Only fifty were permitted under the rules and these were selected for their offices in UKIP and for geographical coverage
The balance are listed as unofficial assentors to acknowledge their kindness.

Proposer
NIGEL FARAGE MEP & UKIP LEADER BROMLEY

Seconder
JEFFREY TITFORD EX MEP & EX UKIP LEADER LEWES

Official Assentors selected for UKIP & geographical position.

DAVID CAMPBELL BANNERMAN MEP & DEPUTY LEADER WEST LONDON
WILLIAM (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH MEP CENTRAL DEVON
STUART AGNEW MEP N NORFOLK & BROADLAND
GODFREY BLOOM MEP HOWDEN
MARTA ANDREASEN MEP RUYMEDE
DEREK CLARK MEP DAVENTRY
JOHN WHITTAKER EX MEP & UKIP CHAIRMAN NORTH LANCS
GRAHAM BOOTH EX MEP TORBAY
ALAN BOWN NEC THANET
GEORGE CURTIS NEC COLCHESTER
CHRISTOPHER GILL NEC LUDLOW
DOUGLAS DENNY NEC BOGNOR & LITTLEHAMPTON
PHIL GRIFFITHS NEC WIRRAL
DAVID LOTT EX PARTY CHAIRMAN OVERSEAS
ANDREW SMITH EX PARTY TREASURER EPPING FOREST
STEVE ALLISON CAMPAIGN MANAGER SEDGEFIELD
DAVID (The Lord) WILLOUGHBY DE BROKE HOUSE OF LORDS STRATFORD ON AVON
STEVE HARRIS HAVANT
DON RANSOME BOSTON & SKEGNESS
FRED McGLADE NORTH LANCS
BRUCE ROBERTSON NORTH CORNWALL
JAMIE (The Earl of) WEMYSS TEWKSBURY
JILL SEYMOUR TELFORD & WREKIN
JOHN KELLY E DEVON
IDRIS FRANCIS NEON VALLEY
MIKE SMITH GLOUCESTER
PETER WYATT TOTNES
DOROTHY BAKER TAUNTON
GREG KNOPP MEDWAY
JEFF MAGER CAMBORNE & REDRUTH
DAVID BENDALL COTSWOLD
STEPHANIE McWILLIAM SE CORNWALL
SIR GEORGE EARLE CENTRAL DEVON
MICK McGOUGH REDBRIDGE & WALTHAM FOREST
ROD TRELEASE BOURNEMOUTH WEST
ROLLO REID CHRISTCHURCH
PAUL HENKE FIFE
MAZHAR MANZOOR GUILDFORD
HUGH WILLIAMS SW DEVON
FRANCES HOWARD SALISBURY
SAM SUTTON NEW FOREST WEST
GERRY KELLEY WARRINGTON
ELIZABETH BURTON North Devon
YVONNE LARG REIGATE
JENNY SLEEP MAIDENHEAD
HUGH JONES SWANSEA WEST
STEPHEN PARKER STROUD
DAVID ROWLANDS MONTGOMERYSHIRE
CHRIS ADAMS AYLESBURY
PETER ADAMS FIFE

Additional Volunteer Assentors in alphabetical order.

G.L-W. Clearly a new EU standardised alphabet!!!

AFONSO AFONSO MOLE VALLEY
SHIRLEY JACOBS SPELTHORNE RW&S
DONALD MACKAY GLASGOW S M Scots Activist
MARGARET ADAMS MAIDENHEAD
CLARE AFONSO MOLE VALLEY
CHRISTINE AVERY TORBAY
MICHAEL BEDFORD ESHER & WALTON
FIONA BEER TOTNES
JEFF BEER TOTNES
MR J BETHEL LUDLOW
MRS C. BETHELL LUDLOW
MARGARET BIGGART MOLE VALLEY
SARAH BLACKBURN Esher Walton
MAURICE BLACKBURN ESHER & WALTON
ADRIAN BLAKE STROUD Stroud Chairman
EMILY BLATCHFORD NW HANTS
KATIE BLOOM HOWDEN MEP Yorks
PAM BOOTH TORBAY
DONALD BRIDGMAN TORBAY
ROBERT BROWN NW CAMBS
LISA BUCKLE CENTRAL ESSEX
CHRISTOPHER CAFFIN NEW FOREST WEST
J CAFFIN NEW FOREST WEST
ROBERT M CANE MOLE VALLEY
GEORGE CHAMBERLAINE MAIDENHEAD
IAN CLARK BORLAND DUMFERNLINE
DENIS CRAWFORD SW NORFOLK
RICHARD CROWDER NORTH WILTS
ELIZABETH CURZON-HOWE NORTH DEVON
ANN DAVIS MAIDENHEAD
C F DUPLA SOMERTON & FROME
RICHARD EDWARDS GLOUCESTER
DEREK ELLIOTT CAMBORNE & REDRUTH
WIINIFRED EVANS FELTHAM & HESTON
DAVE FOWLER AYLESBURY//BUCKINGHAM
PETER FRYETT TORBAY
MARY GATLING SALISBURY SW F Long standing activist
TONY GATLING SALISBURY SW Long standing activist
JOHN GILDER SOMERTON & FROME
JOHN Glanvill TORBAY
STUART GULLEFORD BRENTWOOD & ONGAR E Ex Titford Office manager
IAN HAMILTON EDINBURGH
MARGARET HARDING SOMERTON & FROME
ANDY HEAPE MAIDENHEAD
DICK HORSNELL OVERSEAS
EDWARD HUXLEY RUNNYMEDE & WEYBRIDGE
LESLEY KELLY E DEVON Devon Branch chairman
VALERIE KING SOMERTON & FROME
FREDERICK KING SOMERTON & FROME
KEN KNIGHT MAIDENHEAD
RICHARD LAMERTON HEREFORD SOUTH WM M Hereford Chairman
MRS R LAMERTON HEREFORD SOUTH
CHRISTINA LATHAM LEWES SE F E Sussex Organiser
ANDREW LEIGH PLYMOUTH SW M SWCC Plymouth Chairman
DAVID LUCAS SE CORNWALL SE Cornwall Chairman
TONY McINTYRE TIVERTON SW M SWCCTiverton Chairman
COLIN McNAMEE WELLS
JIM MERRILEES SOMERTON & FROME
PETER MILVERTON SOMERTON & FROME
BOB MIMS CAMBORNE & REDRUTH
JOHN MORAN KINGSTON
CHRIS NORMAN SOMERTON & FROME
BEN PARKER SALISBURY/SW WILTS
DAVID PARKER CAMBORNE & REDRUTH Ex Chairman
IAN PROCTOR ST AUSTEL & NEWQUAY SW M Newquay Chairman
SUE RANSOME BOSTON & SKEGNESS
ANDREW REED OVERSEAS MEP
SUSAN SEYMOUR MAIDENHEAD
JOHN SKELTON TORBAY
G SLEEP MAIDENHEAD
BERNARD SMITH CHICHESTER CHAIRMAN CHICHESTER
JENNIFER SPAIN MOLE VALLEY
DANIEL SPARKES GLOUCESTER Gloucestershire Chairman
JOHN SQUIRE MAIDENHEAD
TONY STONE EAST SURREY SE M Well known SE Activist
IAN M STRACHAN TAYSIDE NORTH
ALAN TALLETT CHRISTCHURCH D
JANET TAYLOR MOLE VALLEY
PAUL TOZER SOMERTON & FROME
JOHN WALLACE ARUNDALE & S DOWNS
JENNY WALSH TORBAY
IAN WALSH TORBAY
KEN WIGHT MAIDENHEAD
MALCOLM WOOD SALISBURY
JENNY WOOD SALISBURY
SHIRLEY WYATT TOTNES

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Malcolm WOOD; Alan WOOD; WOOD; PEARSON; Lord PEARSON; Malcolm PEARSON; Leadership; | Leave a Comment »

#685* – UPDATE OF: #681* – EUkip STORY ILL JUDGED &; SHODDY JOURNALISM

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/10/2009

#685* – UPDATE OF: #681* – EUkip STORY ILL JUDGED &; SHODDY JOURNALISM

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

UPDATE – EUkip STORY ILL JUDGED & SHODDY JOURNALISM by Michael CRICK & THE GULLIBLE COPYIST Christopher BOOKER!

AN EDITORIAL ADDITION WAS MADE AT 18:20hrs. see my second letter below.

AN EDITORIAL ADDITION WAS MADE AT 23:20hrs. see additions below.

Ukip faces bankruptcy after Electoral Commission appeal
There is a startling contrast between the treatment of Ukip and the Lib Dems in cases involving party donations, says Christopher Booker


By Christopher Booker
Published: 8:16PM BST 24 Oct 2009




Thomas Hardy fans will be familiar with the “Skimmington ride”. This was the old practice whereby, when someone had affronted communal morality, a mob would gather outside the culprit’s house to make a loud noise by banging pots and pans together while shouting abuse. Such an unlovely spectacle was the Skimmington conducted by Thursday evening’s Question Time, happily diverting attention from several rather more important issues of the day, such as the suicide of the Royal Mail. These might even have included the fact that, for the first time in history, a British political party, rather more popular and respectable than the BNP, may have to close down, following a court ruling which threatens it with bankruptcy.


A neat summary of some of the illogicalities behind the Appeal Court’s ruling that the UK Independence Party, with 13 MEPs, must hand over £750,000 for a trivial breach of electoral law, was provided on his blog by the BBC’s diligent political reporter Michael Crick.


As “Case A”, he described how, in 2005, Ukip received donations amounting to £363,607 from a bookmaker, Alan Bown. Mr Bown had a legitimate business and had for years been on the electoral register where he lives in Kent. But, due to an oversight, his name had not been included on the register for the year when he gave the money. In 2007, when the Electoral Commission tracked this down, a district judge ruled that Ukip should pay £18,000 as a penalty for failing to check whether Mr Bown’s name was on the register. This was not good enough for the Commission, which appealed, demanding that all Mr Bown’s donations must be confiscated. When the Appeal Court last week supported the Commission, this left Ukip with a legal bill amounting to £750,000 which it hasn’t got, thus facing it with bankruptcy.


Mr Crick then presented “Case B”, concerning Michael Brown, whose donation of £2.4 million was the largest ever enjoyed by the Liberal Democrats. Mr Brown made his gift through a highly dodgy company called 5th Avenue Partners. In 2008, before being found guilty on £10 million fraud charges, he changed his name, grew a beard, he skipped bail and moved to Spain. The Electoral Commission, having investigated this murky story, found that the Lib Dems had accepted the donation in “good faith” (even though it came from a company built on fraud), and seems unwilling to take further action.


The Political Parties, Elections & Referendums Act 2000, which the Electoral Commission was enforcing, was based on a report by the eminent lawyer Lord Neill of Bladen, whose concern, over donations, was that they should come from legitimate sources, not be anonymous, and should not be from people living abroad. In the cases of Bown and Brown, one was an honest Englishman, running a legitimate business whose only mistake was a minor error of paperwork; the other is a very shady character who, having been caught out running a business built on fraud, now lives anonymously abroad.


On which party, asked Mr Crick, do we think the Electoral Commission came down like a ton of bricks? Apart from the Lib Dems, of course, no one will have rejoiced more at last week’s verdict than the Conservative Party. One of the Tories’ biggest fears, since Ukip came second in this year’s Euro-elections with 2.5 million votes, has been that many otherwise natural Tories might be tempted to vote for Ukip again in next year’s general election – not just as Euro-sceptics frustrated by Mr Cameron’s weaselly line on the EU, but in protest against the degradation of all our main parties by the allowances scandals.


If Ukip is forced out of play, many such voters will stay at home. The only electoral beneficiaries of the court’s ruling could thus be the BNP, who, however disreputable themselves, might well win rather more protest votes against the squalid antics of our “political class” than they would have received otherwise.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

FIRST: May I draw attention to the fact that EUkip does NOT face bankruptcy over this matter – the first foolish mistake in the article – as written in to the 2008 accounts as lodged is the statement from the auditors that:
There is a pending risk of liability under legal liability before the Courts in the matter of impremissable donations and that Mr. Alan Bown has undertaken to pay the sum and the costs should the Courts find against EUkip.

May I also point out that under the Constitution The NEC accepts the liability for the debts of the party both jointly and severally a condition, duty and liability that pre dates their obscenely costly incorporation as a Limited Company.

My Comment to The Sunday Telegraph was quite long enough without adding those passing details!

Here is a copy of my comment:
Hi,

I have been something of a fan of Christopher Booker from his early days as a script writer for the seminal TW3, through Private Eye and now a regular in The Sunday Telegraph neither here nor in his books, many with Dr. Richard North, have let down the reader so badly as this article.

This is almost as sloppy a piece of journalism as was that of Michael Crick – Booker you are not the office junior doing re-writes from the worthy you are an investigative journalist – why did you check none of your facts?

I am aware of every step of the way in this case from my first warning the past Treasurer John de Roeke as he has publicly confirmed, the then chairman David Lott and the effective leader of the day Nigel Farage that Alan Bown had permitted himself to be struck off the electoral roll for ‘marital’ reasons.

I advised them that they should repay the money, as they had done with the earlier donation by Sir Jack Haywood of Wolves. & have it repaid either through one of Alan Bown’s legitimate companies (I was unaware of the donations through one of his unregistered companies, at the time!).

Sir Jack Hayward’s Lady wife repaid EUkip the shortfall – thus de Roeke engineered 3 excellent and very beneficial press coverages based upon the single donation and EUkip’s THEN probity.

The Electoral Commission made some 13 telephone & written communications seeking to assist in regularisation.

They even had face to face meetings and EUkip saw fit to make deliberate decisions to insult and antagonise the Official Regulator.

Would EUkip advocate that all laws should be broken by those who can get away with it, if we were unfortunate enough to see them elected?

Eventually after exploring every avenue The Electoral Commission were forced to bring the matter to Court where even on the steps EUkip & Bown would have been permitted to take all parties to lunch and obtain the good publicity of rotating cheques to regularise the matter but no – like a small spoilt child Farage led his hapless band OVER the precipice and even then Judge Tim Workshop showed both wisdom and leniency to the satisfaction of all concerned.

It was only in the aftermath of the court case and rapped knuckles with a ‘contrived’ forfeiture of a mere £18,000 that EUkip were led to destruction by the insults and braggadocio of their leadership cocking a snoot at the Courts and Electoral Commission to such an extent that it could not be reasonably tollerated.

Oh why did you not carry out the very simplest of checks with due dilligence Christopher as to build a reputation for veracity takes years and this second foolish foray makes you look like a man cuckolded by his lover!

Your earlier betrayal of your own standards was over the discreditted Marta Andreasen where you were too blinded by the beauty of the story to let facts get in the way.

Please assure us you have not ignored the facts to bring us the stories of Snatch Vehicles in Iraq, poor policies in Afghanistan, idiocy and betrayal in The EU, duplicity in Governance and more recently that you have not overlooked the facts to write a good yarn on climate and temperature changes and the mendacity of Social Services and The Family Courts.

It is a simple matter to find the full written judgement AGAINST Marta Andreasen on my blog at:
http://CaterpillarsAnd Butterflies.blogspot.com

It was also a simple matter for me to confirm, knowing the details and dishonesty of Andrew Smith, whose ‘e’Mail was published in this paper some years ago I believe or in the rival paper which seems to acquire many of this paper’s better journalists! (Who check their facts!)

I found my conversations with the Electoral Commission informative over the years as was my long conversation when confirming the story you copied from Michael Crick was bunkum – a simple matter of a phone call to an executive in The Lib.Dems. and access to their silk for comment.

Perhaps to help your readers we can enlighted:
The £2.4M. donation was NOT from Michael Brown as you carelessly copied but from his Company 5th. Avenue Partners – unlike the company that made donations to EUkip for Alan Bown 5th. Avenue Partners was a legitimately registered Company in Britain.

Unlike EUkip the Lib.Dems.  (Electoral Commission correction) did ‘due dilligence’ checks above and beyond those called for under law. The company showed as squeeky clean to these checks even to the checks with their bankers of sufficient solvency and legitimacy before presenting the cheque for payment.

The matter was passed, at the end of the allowed 30 days to the Electoral Commission who made absolutely no querie until some time later AFTER a serious fraud office enquiry commenced when The Lib.Dems. were asked to co-operate with the police, which they did.

I understand it would not be too great a stretch to claim that without The Lib.Dims. meticulous files and internal transparency of accounts aided by The Electoral Commission the case against 5th. Avenue Partners and Mr. Michael Brown might not have been so strong as despite the puff & blow of the Government money laundering laws are like so many others that this Government and their EU cronies have devised are just down right shoddy and fail to address the problems for which they are designed particularly with Ponzi type scams as was seemingly the Brown 5th.Ave.Ptnrs. case.

Sadly Christopher Booker you have been shoddy and unprofessional and without even the charm and skirl of a Spanish skirt!

I can obviously provide a great deal more factual information Christopher and am as happy to do so now as when I cautioned on this story from the very start.

I’m so glad I hold the evidence that confirms the story of ‘Janet’ which you have written up brilliantly and can be followed in full at:
http://stolenkids-sads.blogspot.com/ which will shortly include the re-submission to the lower Courts and an outline of The Bundle for The Human Rights Courts together with a privately obtained 6 page escorriation of the handling of the case by a leading custody consultant of world reknown.

Perhaps recovery from the culture shock of a fortnight in India has damaged judgement 😉

Regards,
Greg L-W.
A UKIP supporter
&
Booker Fan of VERY MANY YEARS standing!

Here is another comment!

Mr Booker has completely destroyed his credibility after writing this. I really thought he had more sense than to fall for the Farage spin machine.

UKIP had every chance to rectify their ‘mistake’ but they ignored all of Elcom’s warnings.

Andrew Smith, UKIP�s treasurer at the time, even advised in an email that UKIP mislead Elcom.

Farage then publicly attacked Elcom at a UKIP conference.

Why should we feel any sympathy for Farage? If you break the law you pay the price.


John West


on October 24, 2009 at 11:14 PM

AN EDITORIAL ADDITION WAS MADE AT 18:20hrs. see my second letter below.

I made a further comment on the original article web site in response to other comments made – all of which can be seen at: CLICK HERE
Hi,

Tom Collins is confused when he asks:

How Greg Lance Watkins can call himself a UKIP Supporter, after his vicious diatribe, is beyond me.

But he is VERY Confused when he claims:

The admin.staff at UKIP made an error over a post code address !
That’s all.

If only it was a simple error but clearly it was not as I showed in brief, it was a series of very clear and deliberate decisions by several EUkip executives acting in concert AGAINST the best interests of UKIP members, supporters and these United Kingdoms.

EUkip is of course the party where Derek Clark MEP on Farage’s instruction signed an agreement that Britain would be subject to GREATER Subsidiarity to The EU and that EUkip would work WITH The EU to STRENGTHEN its control over Britain and other vassal states!

I am a dedicated supporter of UKIP wishing Britain to excercise our basic human right of ‘Self Determination’ in freedom through our own accountable Westminster GOVERNMENT not a rubber stamping office of parasites fiddling their expenses.

I as do UKIP members wish Britain to leave The EU and be a self governing global trading Nation.

I totally repudiate the actions of what is EUkip with its alliances with racists, xenophobes, anti Jewish, sexually intollerant, violent bigots as ‘chums’ to form a Pan EU Political Party (masked as the EFD group).

I also repudiate EUkip’s endemic bullying, dishonesty and blatant corruption.

JeremyT has got it right when he claims:
This is a curious judgement

Indeed it is at a glance but when one realises due to deliberate chosen decisions EUkip forced The Electoral Commission and The Courts to this decision it becomes less ‘curious’.

Indeed Alan Bown is the party penalised as EUkip’s accounts clearly show the party as potentially facing the financial liability which the auditors attest is covered by an undertaking by Alan Bown to pay the forfeiture and such costs as are incurred!

Little wonder that Farage and his placemen have seen fit to make a series of utterly idiotic choices to seemingly deliberately exacerbate a situation which the authorities made effort after effort to resolve amicably to UKIP’s advantage.

It is not so much a ‘curious’ judgement as perverse behaviour from EUkip and to whose advantage one is forced to ask oneself as it sure to hell is not of benefit to Britain, the people at large nor members and supporters of UKIP – so very deliberately distanced from EUkip by abuse and obfuscation.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

 AN EDITORIAL ADDITION WAS MADE AT 23:20hrs 25-Oct-2009. see additions below.

I note the following comment made which sadly I am unable to refute – though I do not know ‘Bert’ he seems very well informed and depressingly accurate from EUkip’s viewpoint as they seek to obfuscate by ‘ad hominem attack’ being unable to bring facts to bear – one need only note the unsound and inaccurate comment of Robert Feel Martinis who recently, due to ill health and dishonesty lost his platform and his route to The Gravy Train he craved!

Bert’s comments follow:
1. Why does UKIP refuse to publish its MEPs� EU expense claims? It is hypocritical that UKIP should condemn the EU for failing to sign off its accounts while refusing to detail its MEPs� use of taxpayers� funds.


2. When will Farage publish his expense claims so that voters may learn how he has claimed �2,000,000 in 10 years? What is he hiding? Even Tory MEP5 now publish their EU expense accounts.


3. What happened to UKIP supporters� donations? Between 2003-5, nearly 90% of donations into UKIP�s Ashford Call Centre disappeared in administration costs. Another �200,000+ disappeared in Farage�s SE Region in �other costs� (see Electoral Commission website). Demands for audits have been rejected by Farage. Why? What is being hidden?


4. On 27.1.05, why did UKIP MEP5 vote to support a motion whose subtext called for �closer political, economic and social integration� with the EU, for brainwashing in schools and for the outlawing of �xenophobia�, a thought-crime defined by the EU as merely an aversion to the Euro? UKIP MEPs, who breached their own party constitution, neither apologised nor renounced this treachery.


5. Why, in early 2007, did UKIP MEP Derek Clark sign an agreement in Bucharest endorsing subsidiarity and the Common Agricultural Policy? Roger Knapman, ex UKIP leader, refused to accept such a �. . .major departure from what we believed to be UKIP�s policy � withdrawal from the EU, a complete rejection of its authority and of the CAP. Subsidiarity is an EU doctrine which assumes EU sovereignty. . . Accepting subsidiarity accepts ultimate EU sovereignty.�


6. On 29.2.08 a press statement from Farage condemned the Labour Government for discriminating in favour of Eastern Europeans immigration at the expense of non white immigration from Africa and Asia! What is the point in wishing to preserve the nation state from the EU when, as a result of multiculturalism and Afro-Asian immigration, there will be no nation within the state left to preserve in 40years?


7. Why does Farage receive more appearances on BBC Question Time than any Cabinet Minster? Could part of the answer lie in a press conference when Farage stated that the only means to defeat the BNP was to vote UKIP? In 10 years, UKIP has wasted �millions in taxpayers� funding and private donations; money that has been sidelined into a politically-correct dead end, just like all the efforts of UKIPs� well-meaning members.


8. Why does the foreign Marta Andreasen (Farage�s number two in the SE) merely desire reform of the EU and not withdrawal?


Bert
on October 25, 2009
at 06:46 PM

Now we have the absurd and ill informed comments of one John MacKei who is clearly no associate of the truth or even facts!

Greg Lance-Watkins 07:07 AM


I can see why Nigel Farage was so keen to get rid of you. You’re utterly barmy !


Paolo Caldato 07:12 AM


You’re not mad, just very spiteful – and you don’t understand about the principle of the judiciary interpreting legislation.


The judiciary are required to take great account of what Parliament meant when it passes particular laws; in this case the intention was set out very clearly in Booker’s article.


As the UKIP / Bown case does not fit principle – as clearly laid out in this article – there should have never been a question of them being found in breach of the law, it being a trivial and inconsequential ‘hiccup’ in an administrative process.


Thus, for the Judge to find against UKIP is, to put it mildly, extraordinary.


Clearly there is more influencing the judge than logical application of the law. The fact that UKIP are ‘anti-establishment’ makes the ruling seem like far too much of a coincidence – especially in light of the Liberal Democrats being able to hold on to the proceeds of a serious crime(s).

John Mackie
on October 25, 2009
at 09:26 PM

Hi,

It does seem John MacKie at 09:26PM is no confidant of Farage’s as even Farage would not promote such a claim.

I NEVER joined UKIP – I had no interest in office merely in Britain leaving The EU.

Farage did NOT get rid of me as you so misguidedly claim – I gave Farage the undertaking to support him in any reasonable way as an MEP, officer or any secondary post as the informed will know. (You can easily verrify this if you know any of his dwindling honest staff of the period.[Addition])

I also informed him and others that he could count on my implacable opposition if he ever tried to become leader as I believed he would as leader destroy UKIP as he lacked Officer Qualities or leadership ability and was without gravitas or the required integrity.

How right I was.

As for your understanding of the law in the matter of The Electoral Commission I guess the Telegraph is a little better than a corn flake packet or the advice EUkip has received.

With respect sir you are utterly wrong in how the £3/4Million debt was incurred but why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy story.

IF you can manage to be more rational and consider FACTS do call me and chat through what you have been led to believe because clearly it is untrue.

By all means record the conversation and take it to Silk to have it checked for accuracy.

Have you actually read the law in this matter?

In the light of the letter and spirit of the law as drafted and enacted you will find Judge Tim Workshop’s attempt to ameliorate the original forfeiture was most brave of him and was acceptable to the plaintiff.

It was only the foolish insults by the defendants that forced The Judge into the embarrassment of Judicial Review where it was made most clear he had permitted of a leniency not within his remit.

Rather than hurl unfounded insults based on a lack of facts why not establish the facts with some responsibility.

Mr. MacKenzie since you have seen fit to impugne my sanity yet can not provide one shred of evidence to support your dishonesty perhaps you could act honourably and withdraw your claim and appologise.

Then perhaps you would care to call me and bring some balance to your ill informed accusations even as made against The Judiciary and Her Majesty’s Courts.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Farage; Electoral Commission; El.Com.; Michael CRICK; Christopher BOOKER; BOOKER; Richard NORTH; | Leave a Comment »

#684* – Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/10/2009

#684* – Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK – Leadership Candidate!!!

Hi,

I was most interested to visit Lord Pearsons leadership web site at CLICK HERE

The very first line tells us much:
The full site will be live very shortly but in the meantime here is my manefesto…

does this explain much of his fear of Islam? He has a manefesto where many would have a manifesto – perhaps he is a Buddist – Ommmmmmm Maneeeee Festooooo Ommmmmmmm!

Anyway it continues to say:


Personal Statement from Lord Pearson of Rannoch


Although I understood his reasoning, I deeply regretted Nigel’s decision to step down as leader. Sadly my efforts to get him to change his mind, publicly at the conference and privately, have been to no avail.


I had to think long and hard before putting my own name forward to lead UKIP. I knew that were my bid successful, I would be committing to an indefinite period of hard work and would have to forgo directorships and other interests. However I also realised that any sacrifice would be trivial compared to those made by Nigel Farage over nearly two decades. Dauntingly, I would also find myself successor to the most eloquent politician in the land.


Initially I declined to volunteer because I lacked ambition to lead a political party. But I believe passionately in my country and in the democracy and freedom which so many generations have fought to win and defend, often at terrible cost, all now being sold out by a selfish and deluded generation of gutless professional politicians.


In the end it was the sheer persistence of many UKIP members and donors who said that it was my duty to offer myself to my country’s service. I suppose that is arm-twisting UKIP style!


So what can I offer you?


Perhaps I should start by telling you what I am not. In a party with 13 MEPs I am not an elected politician. You must consider whether that is or is not a virtue. It does mean that I am available in this country, without the continual distraction of continental travel. Certainly I am well placed by my seat in the House of Lords to articulate our case. It is, of course, Westminster where these great issues must eventually be decided.


That I am not a professional politician may be no disadvantage in an age when our political class is widely despised. My background is in international insurance. I would like to think that habits such as delegation, training and financial discipline might be useful in the necessary reorganisation of a party whose power and influence has outgrown its infrastructure.


There is one particular area where I feel I should be able to contribute usefully. With the likely implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, these are perilous days. We are desperately short of time if we are to save our great country. This means we have to rapidly recruit and train a large force of people dedicated to national survival. To this end we need to cast a broad net and my contacts with the wider Eurorealist movement could prove very valuable. Along with David Willoughby de Broke in the Lords, as well as through my activities with Global Britain, I can lay some claim to having rare contacts throughout the movement. I hope that I enjoy some respect from people as politically diverse as Lords Stoddart and Tebbit and with others less well known but with considerable financial assets and patriotic dedication. As far as I know, I have no enemies within UKIP and remain on good terms with many who have left us.


What of my political philosophy? I am essentially interested in conserving the British constitution against all who threaten it, most particularly from those “Traitors within the Gate”, the British politicians who have betrayed their own people.


It is rare for a new party to survive long in British politics. UKIP has stood that test of time and changed the political agenda singlehandedly. Our recent success must now be turned to maximum advantage.


We must develop the quality of our candidates and activists. This requires training, with experienced campaigners helping those who have yet to cut their political teeth. This has to be backed up by activity manuals and informative literature. As someone who has provided (I hope useful) publications such as “What is the point of the European Union?” and “BETTER OFF OUT” I may have something to offer here.


We have speak to the British people in straightforward language. Against the background of the country’s financial crisis, we must show how leaving the EU is positive, invigorating, vastly enriching; in short everything to be welcomed and absolutely nothing to be feared. Hand in glove with this goes the promotion of binding national and local referendums. Only thus can power be returned to the people from the political class in Westminster and Brussels.


UKIP policies should be short and incisive and targeted to emphasise what can only be achieved by leaving the EU. They should also be selected to embarrass the old parties by showing how their political correctitude has left them out of touch with the basic common sense of real people. Examples abound: Their refusal to entrust us with education vouchers or to insist on work permits for foreigners; their failure to maintain our borders and their appeasement of militant Islam.


My ambition is for UKIP to do well enough in the General Election to trigger a revolutionary realignment of British politics. In place of our current ‘one party state’, with all the older parties blindly deferring to the EU, we desperately need a new and genuine Opposition. Already many Conservative MPs and most of their activists are with us. Many decent Labour and Lib Dem supporters are also getting the point.


Our priority, which cannot be overstated, must be to maintain our aim of an amicable divorce from the European Union. My slogan is “Friendship and Free Trade only.” Anything and everything we do must be directed to this end and nothing must compromise this objective.


We now have a growing majority of the British people who share this view and a monopoly, amongst the moderate political parties, in expressing it. This is an electoral gold mine.


I shall feel honoured and humbled if you elect me to lead what is the noblest cause in British politics today. But whoever is elected can rely on my full support.


Malcolm Pearson


Biography.


Lord Pearson of Rannoch was born in 1942 and educated at Eton.


In 1964 he founded the PWS Group of international insurance brokers, which went public in 1984 and was sold to the THB Group in 2008. He is now Hon. President but is willing to sacrifice that position should he become leader of UKIP.


During 1975-82 he was the main protagonist in the “Savonita Affair” at Lloyd’s of London, when his refusal to collect a fraudulent claim led to reform at Lloyd’s, and a new Act of Parliament.


From 1984-90 he actively promoted freedom in the Soviet Union through financial and other assistance to dissident groups.


In the period 1983-92 he represented commerce on the Council for National Academic Awards, Britain’s largest degree awarding body, which validated the courses in our Polytechnics (Universities since 1992). He joined with Baroness Cox and others in fighting far left control of Teacher Training, Social and Media Studies, etc.


In 1984 he founded the Rannoch Charitable Trust, which has funded such things as refugees from Communism in Europe, various human rights initiatives, research into British state education, the environment of the Scottish Highlands, free market economics and Islamic fundamentalism.


In 1990 Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher raised him to the Peerage.


During 1991-97 he led several successful amendments in the Lords on Scottish environmental legislation.


In 1992 he received an Honorary Doctorate (of Laws) from Council of National Academic Awards, for services to Higher Education.


During 1992-96 he was a Member of the House of Lords Select Committee on the European Union, which led him to become a leading exponent of the case for the UK to leave the European Union.


In 1992 he became Hon. President of RESCARE – The National Society for Mentally Handicapped People in Residential Care, a subject where he has family experience.


In 1998 he joined with Lord Harris of High Cross (Independent) and Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Labour) to found “Global Britain”, a non-party think tank, to research alternatives to UK membership of the European Union. (See http://www.globalbritain.org )


In 2004 he lost the Conservative whip for suggesting that people should lend their vote to the UK Independence Party, in elections to the European Parliament, and now sits in the Lords, along with Lord Willoughby de Broke, as a UKIP peer.


His many speeches can be found on http://www.lordswhips.org.uk/


His belief in freedom of speech and disregard of controversy was illustrated in 2009 when he invited the Dutch MP, Geert Wilders, to show his anti-Islamist film, “Fitna”, in a press conference at the House of Lords. When Mr. Wilders was banned by the Home Secretary from entering the UK, Lord Pearson went ahead with the film and accused the British Government of appeasing Islamism. (Google: “Fitna” and “Geert Wilders”).


For many years he has been an articulate critic of the institutional pro EU bias of the BBC and has personally invested in research, proving the case much to their discomfiture.


Lord Pearson’s Web Site CLICK HERE will be available in the
near future.

Let us hope he does not fall foul of ‘The Firm’ and have Her Majesty speaking out in The News of The World against him for having seized her flag as his banner – she has seized on Griffin and his having chosen Winston Churchill and The Spitfire as a theme which EUkip thought was so good that they copied the idea!

I wonder if Her Majesty had been aware that the liar and cheat David Bannerman had visually tried to imply some similarity to Churchill or the part trying to use the symbolism of TheBNP which seems increasingly accurate as EUkip allies itself with the most extreme of racist xenophobes, anti Jewish, violent sexually intollerant bigots that membership of their new Pan EU Political Party group could muster.

We must wait to see if Pearson knows ANYTHING about EUkip or just the lies of Farage and if all goes to plan he can stand down after the General Election if Farage gets elected he can hand the party to David Bannerman to continue the destruction or back to Farage if he fails at Buckingham to fulfill his ambitions.

Meanwhile let us see at what stage EUkip is abandonned and the new Pan EU Party takes over, as posted in my other blog!

Lord Pearson makes a good patsy to carry forward Farage’s ambitions.
TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in UKIP | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: