Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

Archive for the ‘UKIP anti Homosexual’ Category

UKIP & Farage Embroiled in Vile Anti Lawrence Family Racism

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 08/03/2014

UKIP & Farage Embroiled in Vile Anti Lawrence Family Racism
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

UKIP & Nigel Farage Embroiled in Vile Anti Lawrence Family Racism by John White, a candidate they chose due to the inprofessional failure of their selection processes!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

UKIP candidate forwarded racist e-mail ranting against the family of murdered Stephen Lawrence

  • Ex-UKIP candidate sent racist diatribe to Tory MP
  • He stood for the UKIP party in mid-Worcestershire in 2010
  • Was visited by police a fortnight ago
  • In his e-mail he compared Stephen Lawrence to ‘an ape’

By Glen Owen, Mail on Sunday Political Correspondent

|

Questioned: Ex-UKIP candidate John White, who was called into the police after a diatribe comparing Stephen Lawrence to an ape

Questioned: Ex-UKIP candidate John White, who was called into the police after a diatribe comparing Stephen Lawrence to an ape

 

A Tory MP called in the police after his UKIP opponent sent him  a grotesque diatribe comparing  the family of murdered Stephen Lawrence to apes.

Tory MP Peter Luff has revealed that John White, who stood for UKIP in Mid-Worcestershire at the 2010 General Election, emailed Mr Luff to ask if it was ‘a joke’ that Baroness Lawrence had received a peerage.

Mr White attached a tirade by a racist internet commentator, who wrote that the peerage made him ‘ashamed to be British’.

Shockingly, the commentator – who called himself ‘Pete Lucas’ – goes on to say: ‘Mrs Lawrence should be elevated higher than the indigenous Brit, which she would normally be, due to the preference of her species for dwelling in high places’ – seemingly a reference to monkeys.

‘Pete’ goes on to describe the peerage as ‘treason’ and says this ‘latest ludicrous elevation of an ethnic-minority woman to baroness on the grounds of her being black with the distinction of having had a son murdered (sic) by white-men, is a crass injustice’.

Sic is a Latin term used to highlight an apparent mistake – indicating that ‘Pete’ does not believe that Stephen’s death counted as murder.

After Mr Luff told Mr White that he was ‘truly appalled’ by the email, an unapologetic Mr White replied that his nephew had been murdered ‘by some foreigner’ and claimed that the case remained ‘unsolved’ because the victim’s mother was ‘a white British citizen’.  

Mr Luff referred the email exchange to the police – who concluded that although the content was ‘deeply unpleasant’ it did not constitute a crime.

Last night Mr White, 71, confirmed he had been visited by West Mercia police a fortnight ago over the email.

He said: ‘I told them that I had forwarded the email and still agreed with it.

Murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence

Doreen Lawrence at a Liberty Fringe meeting

Write caption here

 

 

‘As far as I’m concerned we have freedom of speech in this country and I will say what I think.

‘I’m not frightened to speak and say what other people are too frightened to say. I’m not racist. I have black and Polish friends but I think it’s wrong that people play the race card just to prove a point.

‘The police wanted to know who Pete Lucas was but I told them I had no idea and they said the case was closed as far as I was concerned.

‘I don’t understand why the Stephen Lawrence case is still going on. It’s been 21 years and it’s time everyone moved on. That’s why I sent it. I still agree with it.’

Mr White claimed he didn’t agree with the ‘monkey’ reference, but still did not regret sending the  email. He added that he had let his UKIP membership ‘lapse’ a couple of years ago.

The row comes just days after a damning report revealed the full extent of corruption by officers investigating Stephen’s death, including a police cover-up and a ‘spying operation’ on the grieving family by an undercover unit.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage has battled to contain a string of revelations about the views held by some of his candidates

UKIP leader Nigel Farage has battled to contain a string of revelations about the views held by some of his candidates

 

Stephen, 18, was stabbed to death by a group of up to six white youths in an unprovoked racist attack at a bus stop in Eltham, South-East London, on April 22, 1993.

Baroness Lawrence fought back tears in the House of Lords last week as she reacted to the report by barrister Mark Ellison QC.

Last night, a UKIP spokesman said that Mr White was no longer a member of the party.

He added: ‘UKIP abhors racism and takes all allegations of racism extremely seriously.

‘John White left UKIP in 2012 after becoming unhappy about the direction of the party.’

Mr White, who won more than 3,000 votes at the last Election, was a member of the Labour Party for 33 years, switching to UKIP when Gordon Brown became  Labour leader.

Last night Mr Luff told The Mail on Sunday: ‘One only has to see the dignity with which Lady Lawrence has reacted to this week’s revelations to realise how much she deserved her place in the Lords.

‘This exposes UKIP for the narrow-minded bigots they really are.’

UKIP leader Nigel Farage has battled to contain a string of revelations about the views held by some of his candidates.

Last week he pledged to weed out ‘eccentric’ candidates who have ‘skeletons in their cupboards’, and said everyone who wanted to stand as an MP or an MEP would have to sign a charter to prove they are not extremists.

As a result all new candidates now have to make a written declaration that they have ‘never engaged in, advocated or condoned racist, violent, criminal or anti- democratic activity’.

To view the original article CLICK HERE
One has to marvel at the crass unprofessional stupidity of Nigel Farage and the team of low lifes and incompetents he has selected as his leadership clique consider:
Last week he pledged to weed out ‘eccentric’ candidates who have ‘skeletons in their cupboards’, and said everyone who wanted to stand as an MP or an MEP would have to sign a charter to prove they are not extremists.
This is as obscene a concept as the vile suggestion by his long term associate and partner in his leadership team as an EFD Group member his MEP Gerard Batten who advocates the racist concept that ALL Muslims should sign an undertaking renouncing violence!

Just how stupid do you think they assume people are – do they really believe someone with mass murder in mind aiming to give up their lives in deluded fanaticism  would be deterred by some footing form signed as a gateway to their dreams of riding on the gravy train!

He added: ‘UKIP abhors racism and takes all allegations of racism extremely seriously.
Yet it was Nigel Farage who set up and recruited members for the odious extremist and racist EFD Group and forced UKIP into not just membership but active participation in the support of the extremists, racists, anti Jewish, anti homosexual advocates of violence as a political expedient in persuit of their xenophobic & racist aims.

The hypocrisy of UKIP leadership clique and many in their claque and the rank and file members, many of whom are ex supporters of the now largely defunct BNP is quite staggering – even by UKIP leadership standards!

As UKIP claim to rise in popularity they obviously come under ever closer scrutiny from the media – whilst they took a low profile they were of little interest thereby proving the veracity of the long held belief:

‘The higher up the tree the monkey climbs the more you see its Rs’.

The natural increase in scrutiny is exposing many very unpleasant views of UKIP & its leadership team and sadly it is this very unpleasant and bullying aspect of UKIP that will be its final undoing!

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in GL-W, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., UKIP, UKIP anti Homosexual, UKIP anti Judaism, UKIP befouled by Batten AGAIN, UKIP Candidate, UKIP Extremism, UKIP Racism | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

#0761* – A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/03/2012

#0761* – A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

.Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.
A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

As published on http://john-ison.blogspot.com earlier this morning!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

 A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

Hi,

it is interesting to note the obvious disgust at John Ison’s behaviour and revulsion at the unprofessional behaviour of UKIP leadership in their anti homosexual and vindictive treatment of Nikki Sinclaire, on a UKIP controlled Forum!

It is all but impossible for UKIP to claim it is not anti homosexual and now especially with the addition of the supporter of Tom Wise!

Roger Helmer defedtee from the Tories because he could not get his own way when he stepped down as an MEP, he who set out to try to have the deffinition of where his house was, in order to try to claim even more expenses as an MEP!

Roger Helmer recently stated his opinion that homosexuality was a treatable mental illness – surely the world left that view behind in the 1960s, when we campaigned for the decriminalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults. I should imagine The Tories are glad to see the back of this idiotic man with his arcane views and his plastic EUroScepticism as he milks the system for all it is worth TO HIM!

  1. Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Fonzarelli View Post
    Depending on which side of the Miss Sinclaire/Mr Ison ‘conflict’ one finds oneself on, one could feel that the other is only interested in smearing them.

    One could, or one could try to think beyond the purely superficial.

    In January 2010, UKIP’s NEC unwisely allowed itself to be dragged into what was basically a personal spat between two MEPs, Sinclaire and Farage.

    The correct course would have been to tell Nigel Farage that the NEC had no constitutional power to compel MEPs to join a particular group (which it hadn’t), and that any complaint about Nikki Sinclaire leaving the EFD should be submitted through the party’s disciplinary channel. That would have forced Farage to demonstrate exactly how Sinclaire had breached UKIP’s rules (if she had), provided an opportunity for mediation, and ensured that if necessary the matter be decided in the proper way by the discipline committee (from which NEC members are barred).

    Instead of which, the chairman of the NEC foolishly issued a statement Statement from UKIP chairman – UK Independence Party on behalf of the committee, announcing that Sinclaire would not be permitted to stand for UKIP at future elections on the grounds of her having left the EP group, and having “failed to declare other relevant issues to the interview panel when she was selected as a UKIP candidate” (which she denied). If Sinclaire chose to challenge this legally, as past experience suggested she might, any breach of normal disciplinary procedure or evidence of her having been treated less favourably than others in similar situations, would obviously disadvantage UKIP hugely.

    Within a matter of months, first Mike Nattrass then Trevor Colman followed her out of the EFD, yet no action was taken against them by the NEC and, unlike Sinclaire, both are still accepted as UKIP MEPs and listed as such on the party website.

    Now we see that the article linked by Alex McKee at #9 raises the possibility that the second of the accusations levelled at Sinclaire – that of failing to declare relevant issues to a candidate selection panel – may also have applied to John Ison.

    Ison stood as UKIP candidate in Redditch in 2005 and Solihull in 2010, being bound by the party constitution on both occasions to make “a written application and shall make full disclosure of any fact, political or personal, that may have a bearing on their suitability for selection as a candidate”. In 2010 the application form stated: “I am not aware of any circumstances from my past that might cause embarrassment to the party were it to be revealed”.

    Did Ison fail to declare that he had been banned by court order from seeing his children, and lie by signing the form anyway? If so, now that the story is known through circulation on the internet, the NEC will be guilty of victimizing Nikki Sinclaire if it doesn’t ban Ison from standing in all future elections just as it has banned her.

    If he did declare it and was allowed to stand despite this, the party and all its future candidates will be at risk from resulting bad publicity, but why would a party that goes to the length of demanding CRB checks on its candidates precisely in order to screen out potential problems, regard a court order protecting five-year-olds from their own father as not having a bearing on his suitability as a candidate?

    Reply With Quote
  2. #23

    Senior Member Steve Morson's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wonderful Worcestershire
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by Barboo View Post
    One could, or one could try to think beyond the purely superficial…..

    And indeed you do, Barboo. A quite stunning post, extraordinarily well-informed and astute.

    The questions it raises, which I asked myself on being informed of the archive article on the court case only recently, are for members of the party. Which is why I did not ask them publicly.

    What a mess.

    Steve
  3. #24

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Barboo View Post
    Did Ison fail to declare that he had been banned by court order from seeing his children, and lie by signing the form anyway?

    I’ve no idea what Ison has or has not declared but he was pre-UKIP a notable public campaigner for fathers rights. How have you come to the apparent conclusion that his own circumstances were not already in the public domain?

    Reply With Quote
  4. #26

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Morson View Post
    And indeed you do, Barboo. A quite stunning post, extraordinarily well-informed and astute.

    Thank you, Steve!


  5. #27

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Independent UKIP View Post
    I’ve no idea what Ison has or has not declared but he was pre-UKIP a notable public campaigner for fathers rights. How have you come to the apparent conclusion that his own circumstances were not already in the public domain?

    I haven’t come to any conclusion on the matter and that is not the point. UKIP’s constitution does not put responsibility onto candidate selection panels for acquainting themselves with applicants’ personal circumstances from what is in the public domain. It states categorically that candidates shall make full disclosure.

    If John Ison did not do so then natural justice demands that he should be treated the same as Nikki Sinclaire in what the NEC claims was a similar circumstance (failure to disclose, which she denies), and banned as she was from standing in future elections. Not to ban Ison would be a second example of Sinclaire being treated more harshly than others, the first being that action was taken against her for leaving the EFD but not against Nattrass and Colman.

  6. #28

    Uber Member Niall Warry's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    7,406

    It is very simple really Nigel doesn’t concern himself with rule books, as I’ve had experience of, by his selfish standards there is one rule for him and his mates and another for his foes.

You may be interested to note YET AGAIN that the false accusation of failure to disclose made against Nikki Sinclaire was an unprofessional pack of lies from UKIP Leadership and pure discrimination.

Nikki Sinclaire was madse technically bankrupt (ie based on the claim of one man who served p0apers at an address at which she clearly did not live as she washelping UKIP set up their head office in Birmingham!).

The details were IMMEDIATELY reported by Nikki Sinclaire to The Returning Officer in the election, in which she stood. She also informed Michael Zucherman The UKIP Part Secretary at the time.

I also published the full details at the time as they were a matter of public record, as is the fact that John Ison was not found guilty in a Court Case of assault on his wife who left him for another woman but WAS deemed unfit to have access to his children, presumably his volatile temper or underhand behaviour were deemed a risk to children.


As to bankruptcy being ostensibly a cause of the UKIP Leadership’s unprofessional and partisan behaviour the Guilty Judgement against Nigel Farage, Godfrey Bloom and UKIP inCourt would seem to indicate otherwise as would the official caution from the EU Parliament aganst Godfrey Bloom for his anti homosexual bullying.


It is interesting to note that John Ison’s vindictive and malicious behaviour against Nikki Sinclaire and his various thefts and seeming ‘construction’ of so called evidence, in collusion with others (including the proven corrupt Christopher Gill see: CLICK HERE) may all be a vindictive attack based on John Ison’s seemingly very ‘challenged’ sexuality and unhappy marriage!


Nikki Sinclaire’s treatment at the hands of UKIP’s partyisan and unprofessional leadership can not be on the grounds of her historic bankruptcy reported at the time, despite the clamourings of Nigel Farage’s sewer rat Mark Croucher who we KNOW colluded in what seems clearly to be efforts to set Nikki Sinclaire up to curry favour with Nigel Farage!


I say it can not be based on the irrefutable fact that Niel Hamilton the formerly disgraced Tory MP was courted by Farage and joined UKIP some 5 years ago and is now, we understand, promised a leading seat as a contender for election to public office once more and as is also a matter of record he was bankrupt and was recently boasting of it on national TV.


Perhaps Niall Warry was correct that in the corrupt world of UKIP:
It is very simple really Nigel doesn’t concern himself with rule books, as I’ve had experience of, by his selfish standards there is one rule for him and his mates and another for his foes.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com  
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<  
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
eneral Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World WideofOUR-ENEMY-WITHIN&To Leave-The-EU 

. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World WideofOUR-ENEMY-WITHIN&To Leave-The-EU  
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Barboo, Ho, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Niall WARRY, Nikki SINCLAIRE MEP, osexual, Roger Helmer, UKIP anti Homosexual, UKIP Bullying, UKIP Leadership Corruption | 1 Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: