Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

Archive for the ‘Police Corruption’ Category

UPDATE Louise Mensch’s Take On Ukip Abuse Of Jasna Badzak

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 12/11/2014

UPDATE Louise Mensch’s Take On Ukip Abuse Of Jasna Badzak
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

!!

>GUEST POST –
UPDATE of CLICK HERE:

Louise Mensch’s Take On Ukip MEP Gerard Batten’s apparent collusion with police in the Abuse Of Jasna Badzak
+
the comments

to date at the time of this posting.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Galvin Reardon

Updated: Did Police lie to Jasna Badzak’s lawyers?

Update Monday: I have added further evidence on the actions of a) the police officer who colluded with Gerard Batten MEP and threatened journalists, and on DC Galvin’s actions against Ms. Badzak and his statements to her lawyers in advance of her criminal trial. I can only suggest readers search for the word “Update”. It seems necessary to evidence at the point where it is referenced, rather than adding it separately.

 

This blog is a story of how two Met Police Officers conspired and colluded against a private citizen on behalf of a politician, Gerard Batten MEP,  falsely arresting her, falsely testifying against her, and framing her for a crime she did not commit.

It is a story of how they were assisted by another policeman who directly colluded with Mr. Batten to smear Jasna Badzak before her trial to journalists, and threaten them if they wrote negative stories on Batten; a fourth policeman corruptly claiming that they did not exist; and a fifth policeman who, I believe, falsely claimed that Officer 4 was uncontactable and could not be asked why he had lied about the existence of these first two officers.

Complaints of police corruption should, of course, normally be addressed through the proper police channels.

But I have hard evidence before me that complaints, repeatedly made through those proper channels, were corruptly dealt with (see the Met Officer in the Directorate of Professional Services lying about the policemen that were the subjects of so many complaints by saying they did not exist, so he would not take the complaint further). I have seen hard evidence that the IPCC referred the corruption case back to the same corrupt force that had lied to, forged evidence on, and threatened journalists over Ms. Badzak.

When the IPCC and the Met’s own DPS are refusing to investigate or actively lying (as I have proven the latter were), the only recourse to justice is the sunlight of public exposure. I put my faith in the public, and once I have blogged with redaction all the evidence I have, only then will I take it to the Met who conspired, and the IPCC who failed to investigate them – despite the clear evidence I put before you all, right now, in the open.

Jasna Badzak is a former member of UKIP.

She has a conviction for fraud (of a month’s salary and travel expenses) for the MEP for whom she used to work, Gerard Batten. She protests her innocence.  She had no prior criminal record, had a high-level security clearance and was of good character as determined in court.

So far, so clear.

Jasna Badzak is also, now, a cardiac patient.

She had her first cardiac arrest at the age of 39, due to stress from being pursued by corrupt officers of the Metropolitan Police force intervening improperly on behalf of an elected politician. She had no prior history of heart trouble of stress. She is now 41 years old and still a cardiac patient; the campaign by certain officers of the Met Police against her continues. I believe and hope that when charges of perverting the course of justice are eventually brought, that the CPS will add to them charges of Actual Bodily Harm – the police officers who did this to Jasna were well aware of her cardiac condition.

On 4th November Ms. Badzak was arrested by a Detective Sergeant in the Major Crimes Unit at Westminster for the alleged crime of harassing Gerard Batten MEP. Despite her cardiac condition, which her lawyers informed this Detective Sergeant of, the unusual decision was taken by the DS concerned to force her and her lawyer to attend the police station in person to be arrested.

He stated that this was done after consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service.

I understand that the criminal offence of “harassment” for which she was arrested constitutes RTing a blog by the socialist former deputy Mayor of London Lee Jasper, and over an article allegedly published in the Sunday Times.

The blog contains Mr. Jasper’s impressions of Ms. Badzak’s various accusations against Batten and UKIP and how the police dealt with them. While I certainly cannot endorse all it contains (simply because I have no knowledge of various matters) Jasper is clear that he describes allegations, rather than facts. I read the blog carefully. It is more about alleged corruption in the Met than it is about Mr. Batten, whom it mentions in passing. Nowhere does the blog make threats towards Mr. Batten. Nowhere does it use racial or religious slurs against him. It is not in the league of actual online harassment against a politician such as that leveled against Stella Creasy MP or Luciana Berger MP.

Furthermore, the arresting officer has arrested, for harassment, ONLY Ms. Badzak. He has not contacted Lee Jasper, who wrote the blog, or Michael Crick of Channel Four News, who earlier RTed the blog. Mr. Crick called the DS in question and asked if he should present himself for arrest too, having also RTed the blog, and earlier than Ms. Badzak did. No reply was forthcoming. I have asked the arresting officer to explain what Major Crime has been committed; why Ms Badzak was required to attend in person given her medical condition; and which of his superiors in the Met knew the grounds on which Ms. Badzak was arrested.

I have obtained evidence of threats made by specific Metropolitan Police officers against other journalists – for clarity, not myself, Michael Crick, nor Lee Jasper (qua blogger), but two other separate journalists.

As I believe that a great abuse of power is being committed here, and that there is evidence of deeply troubling and improper collusion between some officers of the Metropolitan Police Force and politicians to act against a private citizen, I shall be submitting the evidence I hold to the following people and bodies:

The Home Affairs Select Committee

The IPCC

Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe

and the Electoral Commission.

However, as the emails I have obtained appear to involve improper actions by police officers, there must be transparency. Complaining to police officers about police officers does not always, alas, produce the results one would wish.

Here is the exact content of the email sent to a journalist, by a Met Police officer. I am leaving out everything that could identify the parties involved. The email was sent to a journalist at a national publication.

Dear Sirs

It has been brought to the attention of the Metropolitan Police, that in recent days journalist [sic] from [publication – redacted] and [publication – redacted] have been provided material by an unknown source about the political affairs of Mr. Gerard Batten MEP. An ex-employee of Mr. Batten’s  has recently been charged with numerous dishonesty offences [sic] and is currently awaiting trial at Southwark Crwon Court [sic]. Part of the bail conditions for this ex-employee is not to contact directly or indirectly Mr. Batten. This condition is in place to prevent any further publication of articles which the Courts have deemed to be untruthful and concerning to Mr. Batten.

Any articles published which are linked to the subject may result in further arrests being made. I request that while these ongoing Court proceedings are underway that you thoroughly check the sources of the information, prior to contacting either Mr. Batten or going to press.

regards

[signature of the officer. The officer lists themselves as being a “Financial Investigator”]

Police officer threatens journalist

The journalist replies:

I spoke to Gerard Batten about his alleged links to far-right groups such as the English Defence League.

I fail to see how this is relevant to a serving Met officer investigating financial crime. Why have you chosen to intervene in this matter on Batten’s behalf, copying him into our exchange on his private email address?

Most people would interpret it as an attempt to warn me off writing about Batten. This, I believe, is a potential abuse of office.

I’d be grateful if you could respond to the following questions by 7pm tonight:

Who asked you to contact me? Was it Batten or somebody else in your unit/team who knows Batten?

What is your relationship to Batten?

Are you a member or supporter of UKIP?

Are you a member or supporter of [redacted] or any other [redacted] organisation?

Many thanks for your time and attention.

Best wishes,

[name]

Journalist challenges police offier

The reporter also emailed Mr. Batten.

….but I wanted to know why you asked [name of officer] at the Met Police to get in touch with me about something to do with a fraud case when I spoke to you [redacted] about something completely different, i.e. your relationship with Alan Lake and the EDL?

You’ll be familiar with this exchange as [name of officer] copied you in and stated my recent contact with you had been “brought to the attention of the Metropolitan Police” – clearly by you or someone in your office – and then went on to allege that I had been “provided material by an unknown source” without any proof of this. [name of officer] – a financial investigator – said it was all to do with your “political affairs”. So what’s it got to do with him? He even suggested I could be arrested if I published an article about you.

I’d be grateful for your explanation as I have some concerns about such an intervention by the police on behalf of a politician.

Journalist challenges Batten

Now, not only did the police officer above copy in Gerard Batten MEP, on his private email address, to that officer’s threats to this journalist – but Gerard Batten MEP was also in direct contact with the same officer. This again is a typed out email from Mr. Batten to the officer threatening the journalist

Dear [Diminutive, familiar form of the first name of the officer, whose email to the journalist had used their formal first name],

Very sorry to bother you with this. Please see the exchange of messages below. I have only just been able to get into my office to email you, I didn’t have your email address to hand.

I got a text message from [name of journalist being threatened by the police officer] at about 9pm last night. I told him to email me any questions.

In my view he is just trying to draw me out, but we will find out tomorrow.

Regards,

Gerard.

Batten colludes with officer threats

Gerard Batten MEP then forwards on to the police officer the email of reply he sent to the journalist’s questions about his collusion with the police officer. As you will see, Mr. Batten refuses to answer the journalist’s questions about whether he, Batten, asked the officer to intervene with this journalist, threatening him on Batten’s behalf.

Dear [name of journalist],

I sent you an email last Friday with my comments. I have nothing further to add. If you have any questions regarding Mr.] [surname of officer]‘s email, I can only suggest that you address them to him.

Regards

Gerard

You will note that in both instances here, an officer unconnected to the appropriate department appears to be taking unwarranted actions against Ms. Badzak, and in favour of Mr. Batten. The first officer, the one whose emails I posted above, is a Financial Investigator writing about “the political affairs of Mr. Gerard Batten MEP”. The other officer, a different person, who required Ms. Badzak to attend in person for arrest on the charge of harassment for RTing the critical blog, is with the “Major Crimes Unit”. That officer’s response was to tell me to “go through channels” if I had questions for the Metropolitan Police. I do not have any questions for the Metropolitan Police (as of yet). I have questions for that specific officer. I told that officer so and I await that officer’s reply before escalating the complaint.

UPDATE:  I have now been able to establish that the evidence against Jasna Badzak was so wafer-thin that she was re-bailed THIRTEEN TIMES before being charged. I have further established that the charging officer was THE VERY SAME OFFICER who had smeared her to the press before her trial, when she enjoyed the presumption of innocence, and colluded directly with Gerard Batten MEP – both this officer to Batten, and Batten to this officer – in threatening journalists and smearing Ms. Badzak to those same journalists. Below is the charging sheet. I have cut it off before the name of the charging officer can be read. It is the same officer. The top of the charge sheet is also missing as it gives Badzak’s address

Charge sheet

Lee Jasper’s blog is an extraordinary read. It is important to say that I have no idea what in it is truthful or not truthful, but there is one thing in his blog I do want to verify from evidence that I have in my own possession. Here I am quoting sections of his blog on the existence or otherwise (!) of two Metropolitan Police Officers. (I cannot verify that what he reports they did or didn’t do is accurate; he is reporting what Ms. Jadzak told him.)

All of her complaints were being handled by a Metropolitan Police Officer, one Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon. Despite repeated requests for updates on what was happening to her complaints she had no response from Reardon.

…..She reported this intimidation [LM- referred to earlier in LJ blog] to the Met and was surprised to find out that yet again these complaints were being refereed to a Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon, the very same officer who had failed to investigate her initial complaints of UKIP racism and EU fraud.

Worried about escalating violent intimidation and seeking to cope with her own failing health, Jasna then seeks a restraining order court injunction against Batten in Feb 2012.

Met officer supports UKIP. 

Here’s where the begins to get interesting, MPS Detective James Galvin turns up at court, embraces Gerard Batten proceeds to tell the court that the MPS has no record of any allegations against Batten nor were there any current, active police investigation into him. That was a lie and, as the MPS has now admitted Galvin, had no authority to represent the Met or attend court. Her case was eventually dismissed as a result.

I interrupt Lee Jasper’s blog at this point to introduce readers to what appears to be DS James Galvin. Sources say that this is James Galvin’s public Facebook profile

Galvin FB jpeg

This James Galvin has locked his Facebook profile so that his previous online comments and activism re UKIP cannot be seen. Unfortunately for him, he forgot to completely change his settings. The following are taken from “Photos James Galvin Likes” and “Pages James Galvin Likes.” And I have taken screenshots of a great, great many more. Enjoy – although I’m sure Jasna Badzak didn’t

GU 1jGalvin UKip 12jGU 5jGU 6jG U P 1jG U P 2j 

By Sunday, 9th November, DS Galvin had removed all the UKIP photos he liked and UKIP pages he liked from his Facebook, after I tweeted several examples. He had left up his pro-UKIP activism on “Posts James Galvin likes” and “Posts James Galvin has commented on.” DS Shaun Reardon had also deleted his LinkedIn profile. If indeed this is the same James Galvin, the conflict of interest with Galvin’s political activism online is obviously huge.

I have been able to verify, in a court statement provided in the civil case by DS James Galvin, that he intervened in a private citizen’s civil case on behalf of Gerard Batten MEP of UKIP.  I have this evidence in my possession.

Galvin civil statement

Furthermore, having intervened in a civil case on behalf of Gerard Batten MEP without any authorization to do so, James Galvin should not have been investigating Jasna Badzak for any alleged offence. He had a giant conflict of interest. Ms. Badzak filed a complaint against him as soon as he intervened in her civil case.

Update: I have now been able to verify that police documents exist, appearing to show that DC Galvin told Ms. Badzak’s lawyers saying he had NOT been a witness in the civil case.

Galvin civil

“Whilst investigating another matter a man called Goran from Hodge Jones and Allen who claimed to represent Ms. Badazk asked me if we were going to charge Ms Badzak, he also asked if I had given evidence in a civil matter. This took place in the custody suite of Charing Cross Police Station. When answerd [sic] that the CPS would be handed the file and I had not given evidence he said “He had concerns”. I invited him to make a formal allegations [sic] if he had concerns and upon showing him out of the Police station asked him to make his complaint to a senior officer via the station office if he had “Concerns”

Yet despite all these many, huge, irregular, politically motivated actions DC James Galvin took against Jasna Badzak, he was one-half of the investigating team and one-half of the arresting team.

My quotation from Lee Jasper’s blog resumes below

Gerard Batten, then formally wrote to the MPS on October 5th 2012 reporting his fraud allegations against Jasna. He actually wrote his allegation on UKIP letterhead, which must constitute and attempt to politically influence the investigation.  The Met having failed to investigate any of Jasna serious previous allegations, then acted immediately upon receipt of Battens complaints. .

Jasna was subsequently arrested on 29th November 2011, when surprise, surprise, Detectives Constable James Galvin and Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon both, attended her home. They wanted to arrest her there and then, but she Jasna was so ill, it was decided to take her to hospital instead.

The Met formally denies the existence of two serving police officers misleading the Prime Minister David Cameron. 

Subsequent to her eventual arrest and charging, Jasna wrote to the Met Commissioner Bernard Hogan Howe asking, why her many complaints to the MPS had not been investigated? This she pointed out, was in total contrast to the Mets swift and immediate response to Battens complaint.

This lead to another key question, why had DC Galvin had turned up at the injunction hearing, defending Batten?

The answer, when it came, was as shocking as it was unexpected. The Mets Department of Professional Standards informed her that the Metropolitan Police Service employed no such named police officers. Shocked and alarmed she persisted and again she was told again that no such officers were employed by the Met.

She then wrote to the Independent Police Compliant Commission who after some time, wrote back, confirming, that after discussions with the Met, they too  confirmed that no such officers existed.

Jasna at this stage was completely frustrated and wrote to Mayor of London, Boris Johnson and Prime Minister David Cameron. Both men wrote to the Met and both were told, in writing, that no such officers worked for the Met.

The fact is the Prime Minister, the Mayor of London and the IPCC, were mislead and possibly willfully mislead, by the Met DPS about the existence of these two officers.

This begs they very important questions as to precise circumstances that led to two of the most senior Tory politicians in the land were provided with inaccurate and misleading information?

I can confirm in this blog that I have, in my possession, the following evidence:

1. A letter to Jasna Badzak from a third officer at the Met Police’s Directorate for Professional Standards saying that they could not investigate a complaint against officers Galvin and Reardon because they did not exist “the officers you have named as being officers of the MPS are not officers with the MPS. I have throughly interrogated all MPS systems and cannot find any trace of those officers.”

DPS lies on headed paper 2j

2. An email  to Jasna Badzak from the same officer dated 10 Jan, 2013, again repeating that these two officers, do not exist (following her astonished protests of disbelief, since these officers had actually shown up at her house and arrested her).

Jasna Galvin 2

3. Firm evidence that, in a phone call to Ms. Badzak, a fourth officer – this time of the rank of Inspector, I think it is important to state that – spoke to her about this matter and stated

Insp: “In 2012, I understand you attempted to make a complaint about officers Fleming, Galvin and Reardon… you made a complaint.” Ms. Badzak said she had made a complaint to the Mayor of London and the Prime Minister, who, she said, wrote to Bernard Hogan-Howe, who, she said, passed it further down. The Inspector replied “Yes”. “And I got the reply which I got which said that these police officers do not exist,” Ms. Badzak responded. “Yes,” the Inspector replied. “We made an error, and I apologize for that error.” Ms Badzak exclaimed “You made an error!” The Inspector replied “Yes. They do exist. It wasn’t correct what we told you.” Ms B: “So why did you tell me that, then?” Insp “The officer who made that decision, and told you, is on a career break, he’s not in the country, I can’t ask him why. But it may be that he misread our database. You know – sometimes people make human errors. But the bottom line is we made a mistake, I apologize, we made a mistake.

Again – Ms Badzak was arrested, November 4th, by a DS in the Major Crimes Unit, Westminster, for “harassment” of Gerard Batten, MEP, for RTing a blog in which these allegations are detailed.

UPDATE: THU Nov 6, 2 of 2: I have now seen evidence that Ms. Badzak’s conviction for fraud was based in large part on an “expert witness statement” provided by DS Shaun Reardon. This is the same DS Reardon to whom she had addressed all her initial complaints about UKIP racism and Mr. Batten, complaints which had not been acted upon. This is the same DS Reardon whom she complained about to the IPCC. When Ms. Badzak was reporting extensive physical harassment at her home by members of the EDL, as noted in Lee Jasper’s blog, she was amazed to find that her complaints about that were being directed to…. DS Shaun Reardon, whose inaction was the subject of her IPCC complaint. Again, nothing was done. 

It was Officer Galvin whom, it is alleged, showed up, unauthorized, to court to defend Mr. Batten in her attempt to secure a restraining order against Batten (I am trying to verify this part of the story).

But it was then DS Reardon and Officer Galvin together who showed up at Ms. Badzak’s house to arrest her for fraud. She complained about both of them – clearly there was at this point a colossal conflict of interest in having either officer, both with pre-existing complaints about them to the police, arrest or investigate Ms. Badzak for anything. And then she was told, the Mayor of London was told, and the Prime Minister was told, falsely, that neither officer existed, see above.

This morning I must update and report that I now have further evidence in my possession that Ms. Badzak’s conviction for fraud was based in large part on the “expert forensic witness” of DS Shaun Reardon who claimed that she forged a bank statement. I have a copy of DS Reardon’s “expert witness” statement to the court, testifying against Ms. Badzak This is the same Reardon who was the subject of her complaints and who was “disappeared” by the Directorate of Professional Standards at the Met in a letter, on headed official paper, in my possession. 

As far as I can tell the only evidence against Ms. Badzak for fraud was this “altered statement” alleged to exist by…. Detective Sgt. Shaun Reardon

More later. 

Personally, I believe in transparency. I am absolutely confident of my evidence and I present it here in order that there be as little cover-up going forwards as possible. I am prepared to make my evidence available to the IPCC and other sources.

One officer threatening a journalist

A separate officer in the Major Crimes Squad arresting Ms Badzak for harassment

A third officer from the Directorate of Professional Standards denying the existence of Met Police Officers (twice, and in detail, and emphatically) that Ms. Badzak claims harassed her

A fourth officer of the rank of Inspector telling Ms Badzak that the officer who denied their existence was “on a career break” “out of the country” “I can’t ask him why” “It may be that he misread our database”

Clearly, this matter goes beyond any kind of politics to the very deepest, darkest abuses of our capital’s major police force against a private citizen. I am not an investigative journalist (thankfully, Mr Crick does have those credentials) but I recognize shocking abuse when I see it, and I hope I have enough of a sense of duty not to remain silent when I am confronted with hard evidence of injustice being done.

Post navigation

30 thoughts on “Updated: Did Police lie to Jasna Badzak’s lawyers?”

      1. Hi,

        I would contend he is not being gutless – merely acting to close ranks and destroy evidence that might be used to gain justice – rather than support what seems to be a completely corrupt case.

        Seems like a case of police destroying evidence prior to disclosures!

        Regards,
        Greg_L-W.

      2. The good news is that I took screen snapshots of his linkedin credentials. It’s mainly IT, counter terrorism, financial and terrorism work related experience.

        The scary part is that this creature was heavily involved in corruption/bribery, fraud and money laundering, etc investigations. If, as alleged, he had been involved in framing a mother for the most trivial amount of money, evaded questions from the prime minister and was hidden by the department of professional standards, then what credibility is there in his investigative career? Is his m.o, to frame targets he investigates?

      3. Hi,

        this and the removal of evidence from other social networks is not illegal mut it does show an element of shame and possible guilt at their behaviour – not to mention their willingness to destroy evidence to shine a different light on facts.

        Just as they (the Police & Judiciary) would seem to have done in collusion with the clearly dishonest Gerard Batten who has provided other examples of his efforts to corrupt British Justice.

        Regards,
        Greg_L-W.

  1. A search for MPS Detective James Galvin does not produce anything. He does not seem to be an MPS officer or has been retired for some time.

    1. Thanks to Olympic Champion Matthew Pinsent on Twitter (@matthewcpinsent) for finding this from Sep 2013 – scroll to bottom of article for our friend “Disappearing DC James Galvin”

    2. I can’t reply to your comment above b/c of word press’s stupid nesting policy, but you are so right. DS Reardon’s corrupt actions in this case render ALL OF HIS CONVICTIONS now unsafe. This will be HELL ON EARTH for the Metropolitan Police Force.

  2. Hi,

    I can confirm the style of behaviour of Ukip’s MEP Gerard Batten and his apparent collusion with what seems, all too clearly, to be a corrupt element of the police.

    Whether the police in question are current or ex members of the BNP or current or past members of Ukip and or other extremist groups is hard to ascertain – due largely to the clandestine nature of those concerned and their lack of transparency.

    I am able to confirm the behaviour having been investigated by police named in Jasna Badzak’s case and having been arrested and interviewed under caution on their instruction – based upon the lies or at very least distortions of fact by Gerard Batten.

    Regards,
    Greg_L-W.
    Greg Lance-Watkins
    Greg_L-W@BTconnect . com

    http://ukip-vs-eukip.com

    1. If DS James Galvin is from Essex then he was certainly a member of the BNP as I have an old membership list with address and email

      1. Yup, I do think Galvin might be BNP. Also the article states that Ms. Badzak was harassed at home by EDL activists.

        One wonders if EDL are in fact the street action arm of UKIP? More interestingly, does the EDL fall under the control of MPS intelligence officers like the two disappearing creatures?

  3. It does occur to me that these vanishing Police Officers might have been involved in undercover investigations, not necessarily at the time the enquiries were made, and their identity as Police Officers might not be easy to confirm. We know that decades after such activity, the MPS will “neither confirm nor deny” the existence of a Police officer with such a history. (See “Bob Lambert” case described at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29743857 )

    Maybe such caution is justified, but an arrest creates documents, signed by officers, and this raises an obvious question: how does a non-existent Police Officer make an arrest?

    Was a name mis-spelled and did that mess up the records search? If that’s how the MPS works. it’s pretty incompetent.

    1. If DS Shaun Reardon is now undercover, then why are his details on LinkedIn? Why is he advertising his skills, paid for by the taxpayer, as transferable to the commercial sector; does it include his SO15 knowledge? Is Reardon under deep cover hassling cardiac patients and minorities in Tottenham? What are his connections with the MPS’s Air Support Unit and his apparent commissioning of tasks?

      1. So now Reardon’s personal details are no longer public. Does this mean that the Metropolitan Police Service are now going to lash out like the first shits they are? You know dawn raids, seizures of computers, the usual smashey smashey and hard arrests.

    2. Hi,

      silly me – I thought police confidentiality was to present wives becoming aware of their relationships with women under surveilance and to prevent those same women claiming maintenance for police children conceived whilst ‘On The Job’!

      Regards,
      Greg_L-W.

  4. she should count nerself lucky that she had a degree of notoriety. the law is supposed to be a caution and two courses of action before you can be tried for ‘non violent harassment’ however working as a reporter for a local publication I have sat through hundreds of cases pushed through to court by the cps, where the accused has allegedly sent as little as a facebook message or text and there is no actual evidence they were even linked to the accounts or at the device at the time – only for these cases either to be backed up by a bent cop or the victims ‘friend’ obviously in on the charade who provides the hearsay evidence that they ‘think this person sent the message’ and the magistrate finds them guilty every single time and we are instructed by our editor not to mention any of this – and just print the guilty verdict alonside the accusation – which they are allowed to do simply because magistrates court proceedings arent recorded! these people will be told they have a right to appeal, but in 99% of cases the appeal court will see the guilty verdict and the charge turn that appeal down because they dont want to be wasting money on an appeal case over a facebook message, even though that conviction stands to ruin someones career or life!

    record ALL magistrates court events and force police to wear shoulder mounted cameras I say, which wont happen, because the CPS know the police will have to actually obey the law and you will see the conviction rate fall by half overnight!!

  5. I should further add that in many of these cases the magistrates are way out of their depth to even be presiding on 21st century issues and clearly dont even understand the internet or social networking which is capitalised on by the CPS who are blatantly just making things up on the spot and the evidence presented by the police and CPS clearly fails necessary evidence standards on so many levels, which is just skirted over to give some poor sod who doesnt even know whats going on a guilty verdict despite protesting his innocence, who is then further named and shamed as a ‘harasser of women’ by the local press doubling his woes. the legal system is rotten to the core and these ‘guilty even when proved innocent’ laws like harassment offer too much wiggle room for the spineless to work in cohorts with bent cops and abuse them.

  6. Looks like the day of the SWEATS has arrived for Reardon and Galvin. Apparently Galvin gave false witness in a court of law.

    Is Ms. Badzak’s conviction still considered safe? Is UKIP fit for public office? How many UKIP members are also BNP members?

  7. OOOOoo! This is getting delicious. I love it when corrupt bullies get their comeuppances.

    Please take care. The MPS is corrupt and stupid enough to call in favours with New York’s ‘finest’.

  8. I have found your blog via Mr Jasper and I am disgusted but not surprised at the clear corruption against Ms B from public servants within the MPS.
    All to often in life many watch as injustices of all kinds takes place on this planet,you have written your blog beautifully well with enough subtle dry sarcasm to make me chuckle at the outrageous actions of those concerned within the MPS.
    It is correct the officers related should face charges of ABH against Ms B,furthermore the request of her attendance at the police station on her sons birthday is NOT a coincidence the *powers that be* are essentially trying to ruin this brave woman for standing up against corruption and trying to send her insane.
    I am personally dealing with the DPS currently as a private citizen who herself has had to challenge overt and subtle collusion from officer x in an ongoing complex harassment campaign against myself conducted by a not very pleasant individual,the police have been used by this individual to encroach upon my life and disturb my desire of living peacefully.
    Causing me alarm and distress while attempting to harass me at my private dwellings.
    To not stand up and say *no* to bullies is not an option.
    I think it extremely important and courageous of Ms B foremost for highlight ing this severe breach of power against herself and her family.
    Yourself Mr Jasper, keep up with this and while important to be careful do not let any attempts at oppressing the truth silence what needs ideally to be picked up media wise nationally and internationally.

    1. Are subjected to stalking type harassment by the Metropolitan Police Service? They are known for using various security state infrastructure to hound people as an extra-judicial measure.

To view the original of this article (as updated) CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Gerard BATTEN, Jasna Badzak, Louise Mensch, Police, Police Corruption, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

When The CPS, Courts, Police & Politicians Are Corrupt?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 09/11/2014

When The CPS, Courts, Police & Politicians Are Corrupt?
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

When The CPS, Courts, Police & Politicians Are Corrupt, as they would seem to haver been in Ukip MEP Gerard Batten’s persecution and abuse of Jasna Badzak (or for that matter myself) who can honest people of integrity turn to?

We have today had the publication of how these people can spirit away 100s of files effecting a cover up of sexual abuse of children in the days of Leon Britton – what hope of justice and conviction of the real criminals!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
to the informed it is abundantly clear that this article is an outcome of the apparent abuse of the legal process by Ukip MEP Gerard Batten in collusion with police officers who show clear signs of corruption and a case which has corrupted British Justice in the Courts – for more details See CLICK HERE
MENSCH, Louise THE SUN re CPS 10-Nov-2014 02
Here is the article in full – to view it at a more convenient size do find it on The Sun web site or double click the view below:
MENSCH, Louise THE SUN re CPS 10-Nov-2014 04
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Gerard BATTEN, Jasna Badzak, Louise Mensch, Police, Police Corruption, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST: Update BY Louise Mensch re Batten

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 07/11/2014

>GUEST POST: Update BY Louise Mensch re Batten
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Earlier >GUEST POST: Updated BY Louise Mensch re Ukip MEP Gerard Batten & matters pertaining to his apparent abuse of Jasna Badzak in collusion with police and others.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

UPDATE:

THU Nov 6, 2 of 2: I have now seen evidence that Ms. Badzak’s conviction for fraud was based in large part on an “expert witness statement” provided by DS Shaun Reardon. This is the same DS Reardon to whom she had addressed all her initial complaints about UKIP racism and Mr. Batten, complaints which had not been acted upon. This is the same DS Reardon whom she complained about to the IPCC. When Ms. Badzak was reporting extensive physical harassment at her home by members of the EDL, as noted in Lee Jasper’s blog, she was amazed to find that her complaints about that were being directed to…. DS Shaun Reardon, whose inaction was the subject of her IPCC complaint. Again, nothing was done. 

It was Officer Galvin whom, it is alleged, showed up, unauthorized, to court to defend Mr. Batten in her attempt to secure a restraining order against Batten (I am trying to verify this part of the story).

But it was then DS Reardon and Officer Galvin together who showed up at Ms. Badzak’s house to arrest her for fraud. She complained about both of them – clearly there was at this point a colossal conflict of interest in having either officer, both with pre-existing complaints about them to the police, arrest or investigate Ms. Badzak for anything. And then she was told, the Mayor of London was told, and the Prime Minister was told, falsely, that neither officer existed, see above.

This morning I must update and report that I now have further evidence in my possession that Ms. Badzak’s conviction for fraud was based in large part on the “expert forensic witness” of DS Shaun Reardon who claimed that she forged a bank statement. I have a copy of DS Reardon’s “expert witness” statement to the court, testifying against Ms. Badzak This is the same Reardon who was the subject of her complaints and who was “disappeared” by the Directorate of Professional Standards at the Met in a letter, on headed official paper, in my possession. 

As far as I can tell the only evidence against Ms. Badzak for fraud was this “altered statement” alleged to exist by…. Detective Sgt. Shaun Reardon

More later. 

Personally, I believe in transparency. I am absolutely confident of my evidence and I present it here in order that there be as little cover-up going forwards as possible. I am prepared to make my evidence available to the IPCC and other sources.

One officer threatening a journalist

A separate officer in the Major Crimes Squad arresting Ms Badzak for harassment

A third officer from the Directorate of Professional Standards denying the existence of Met Police Officers (twice, and in detail, and emphatically) that Ms. Badzak claims harassed her

A fourth officer of the rank of Inspector telling Ms Badzak that the officer who denied their existence was “on a career break” “out of the country” “I can’t ask him why” “It may be that he misread our database”

Clearly, this matter goes beyond any kind of politics to the very deepest, darkest abuses of our capital’s major police force against a private citizen. I am not an investigative journalist (thankfully, Mr Crick does have those credentials) but I recognize shocking abuse when I see it, and I hope I have enough of a sense of duty not to remain silent when I am confronted with hard evidence of injustice being done.

To view the original of her statement where some of the comments are most informative with alarming revelations of the corruption of British ‘Justice’
CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in BATTEN, Gerard BATTEN, Police, Police Corruption, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST: Summarising The Vile Behaviour Of Gerard Batten

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 06/11/2014

>GUEST POST: Summarising The Vile Behaviour Of Gerard Batten
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

 >GUEST POST by Louise Mensch:

Summarising The Vile Behaviour Of the Ukip MEP Gerard Batten in bullying and harrassing Jasna Badzak whom he would seem to have colluded with apparently corrupt police officers to persecute and abuse.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
having been the target of the lies and distortions of Gerard Batten myself in the past, where by distorting the facts he colluded with, what seemed to be corrupt police, to try to have me arrested and prosecuted in clear abuse of his elected public office as a servant of the people.
I was in fact arrested and interrogated for around 3 hours based upon Gerard Batten’s corrupt dishonesty, mainly regarding his overt racism and publications seemingly designed to incite racial hatred, distrust and possible violence.
Fortunately the South Wales Police were less inclined to jump to his bidding and advised I had done no wrong and nno further action was possible on the part of the Met. Police who were working for Gerard Batten and Ukip and seemingly in cahoots in the corruption.
Having seen a copy of Jasna Badzak’s most recent arrest warrant/notification:
BADZAK ARREST CHARGES 01 04-Nov-2014
and being all too well aware of the corruption, bullying, lies and general abuse of office by Ukip, its leadership clique and its claque I regret I find all that Louise Mensch has had to say in her GUEST POST below, just as the Post by Lee Jasper in his original posting I found totally plausible and more than likely.
I believe Gerard Batten is beneath contempt and sadly he does little damage to Ukip for those who have a grasp of the shamefull standards of the low lifes who lead and in many cases exploit it for their personal gain and in keeping with their lack of ethics and integrity in persuit of racist aims, anti homosexual beliefs and willingness to lie with the aplombe of their leader Nigel Farage who would seem, like so many sociopaths, all too willing to preside over an utterly befouled organisation seemingly created in his own disgusting image.
Galvin Reardon

Why Was Jasna Badzak Arrested for RTing a Critical Blog about UKIP?

Jasna Badzak is a former member of UKIP.

She has a conviction for fraud (of a month’s salary and travel expenses) for the MEP for whom she used to work, Gerard Batten. She protests her innocence. She had no prior criminal record, had a high-level security clearance and was of good character as determined in court.

So far, so clear.

Ms. Badzak is also a cardiac patient.

On 4th November Ms. Badzak was arrested by a Detective Sergeant in the Major Crimes Unit at Westminster for the alleged crime of harassing Gerard Batten MEP. Despite her cardiac condition, the unusual decision was taken by the DS concerned to force her and her lawyer to attend the police station in person to be arrested.

He stated that this was done after consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service.

I understand that the criminal offence of “harassment” with which she was charged constitutes RTing a blog by the socialist former deputy Mayor of London Lee Jasper, and over an article allegedly published in the Sunday Times.

The blog contains Mr. Jasper’s impressions of Ms. Badzak’s various accusations against Batten and UKIP and how the police dealt with them. While I certainly cannot endorse all it contains (simply because I have no knowledge of various matters) Jasper is clear that he describes allegations, rather than facts. I read the blog carefully. It is more about alleged corruption in the Met than it is about Mr. Batten, whom it mentions in passing. Nowhere does the blog make threats towards Mr. Batten. Nowhere does it use racial or religious slurs against him. It is not in the league of actual online harassment against a politician such as that leveled against Stella Creasy MP or Luciana Berger MP.

Furthermore, the arresting officer has arrested, for harassment, ONLY Ms. Badzak. He has not contacted Lee Jasper, who wrote the blog, or Michael Crick of Channel Four News, who earlier RTed the blog. Mr. Crick called the DS in question and asked if he should present himself for arrest too, having also RTed the blog, and earlier than Ms. Badzak did. No reply was forthcoming. I have asked the arresting officer to explain what Major Crime has been committed; why Ms Badzak was required to attend in person given her medical condition; and which of his superiors in the Met knew the grounds on which Ms. Badzak was arrested.

I have obtained, as a journalist, some evidence of threats made by specific Metropolitan Police officers against other journalists – for clarity, not myself, Michael Crick, nor Lee Jasper (qua blogger), but a separate journalist.

As I believe that a great abuse of power is being committed here, and that there is evidence of deeply troubling and improper collusion between some officers of the Metropolitan Police Force and politicians to act against a private citizen, I shall be submitting the evidence I hold to the following people and bodies:

The Home Affairs Select Committee

The IPCC

Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe

and the Electoral Commission.

However, as the emails I have obtained appear to involve improper actions by police officers, there must be transparency. Complaining to police officers about police officers does not always, alas, produce the results one would wish.

Therefore I am now going to type out the exact content of the email sent to a journalist by a Met Police officer. I am leaving out everything that could identify any of the parties involved, including the date, the location, the names of the publications, the recipient, or the sender. But unredacted evidence will be sent to those parties I have identified above. The email was sent to a journalist at a national publication.

Dear Sirs

It has been brought to the attention of the Metropolitan Police, that in recent days journalist [sic] from [publication – redacted] and [publication – redacted] have been provided material by an unknown source about the political affairs of Mr. Gerard Batten MEP. An ex-employee of Mr. Batten’s  has [redacted] been charged with numerous dishonesty offences [sic] and is currently awaiting trial at Southwark Crwon Court [sic]. Part of the bail conditions for this ex-employee is not to contact directly or indirectly Mr. Batten. This condition is in place to prevent any further publication of articles which the Courts have deemed to be untruthful and concerning to Mr. Batten.

Any articles published which are linked to the subject may result in further arrests being made. I request that while these ongoing Court proceedings are underway that you thoroughly check the sources of the information, prior to contacting either Mr. Batten or going to press.

regards

[signature of the officer. The officer lists themselves as being a “Financial Investigator”]

The journalist replies that they have attempted to contact the officer by phone but failed to reach them. I am omitting this in case it offers identifying information. The journalist’s reply goes on

I spoke to Gerard Batten about his alleged links to far-right groups such as [redacted].

I fail to see how this is relevant to a serving Met officer investigating financial crime. Why have you chosen to intervene in this matter on Batten’s behalf, copying him into our exchange on his private email address?

Most people would interpret it as an attempt to warn me off writing about Batten. This, I believe, is a potential abuse of office.

I’d be grateful if you could respond to the following questions by 7pm tonight:

Who asked you to contact me? Was it Batten or somebody else in your unit/team who knows Batten?

What is your relationship to Batten?

Are you a member or supporter of UKIP?

Are you a member or supporter of [redacted] or any other [redacted] organisation?

The reporter then signs off. I have also seen an email from the reporter to Mr. Batten.

….but I wanted to know why you asked [name of officer] at the Met Police to get in touch with me about something to do with a fraud case when I spoke to you [redacted] about something completely different, i.e. your relationship with [redacted] and [redacted]?

You’ll be familiar with this exchange as [name of officer] copied you in and stated my recent contact with you had been “brought to the attention of the Metropolitan Police” – clearly by you or someone in your office – and then went on to allege that I had been “provided material by an unknown source” without any proof of this. [name of officer] – a financial investigator – said it was all to do with your “political affairs”. So what’s it got to do with him? He even suggested I could be arrested if I published an article about you.

I’d be grateful for your explanation as I have some concerns about such an intervention by the police on behalf of a politician.

I am redacting the rest of the email, but there is nothing further substantive to it.

You will note that in both cases here, an officer unconnected to the appropriate department appears to be taking unwarranted actions against Ms. Badzak, and in favour of Mr. Batten. The one officer, whose emails I quote here, is a Financial Investigator writing about “the political affairs of Mr. Gerard Batten MEP”. The other officer, a different person, who required Ms. Badzak to attend in person for arrest on the charge of harassment for RTing the critical blog, is with the “Major Crimes Unit”. That officer’s response was to tell me to “go through channels” if I had questions for the Metropolitan Police. I do not have any questions for the Metropolitan Police (as of yet). I have questions for that specific officer. I told that officer so and I await that officer’s reply before escalating the complaint.

Lee Jasper’s blog is an extraordinary read. It is important to say that I have no idea what in it is truthful or not truthful, but there is one thing in his blog I do want to verify from evidence that I have in my own possession. Here I am quoting sections of his blog on the existence or otherwise (!) of two Metropolitan Police Officers. (I cannot verify that what he reports they did or didn’t do is accurate; he is reporting what Ms. Jadzak told him.)

All of her complaints were being handled by a Metropolitan Police Officer, one Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon. Despite repeated requests for updates on what was happening to her complaints she had no response from Reardon.

…..She reported this intimidation [LM- referred to earlier in LJ blog] to the Met and was surprised to find out that yet again these complaints were being refereed to a Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon, the very same officer who had failed to investigate her initial complaints of UKIP racism and EU fraud.

Worried about escalating violent intimidation and seeking to cope with her own failing health, Jasna then seeks a restraining order court injunction against Batten in Feb 2012.

Met officer supports UKIP. 

Here’s where the begins to get interesting, MPS Detective James Galvin turns up at court, embraces Gerard Batten proceeds to tell the court that the MPS has no record of any allegations against Batten nor were there any current, active police investigation into him. That was a lie and, as the MPS has now admitted Galvin, had no authority to represent the Met or attend court. Her case was eventually dismissed as a result.

Gerard Batten, then formally wrote to the MPS on October 5th 2012 reporting his fraud allegations against Jasna. He actually wrote his allegation on UKIP letterhead, which must constitute and attempt to politically influence the investigation.  The Met having failed to investigate any of Jasna serious previous allegations, then acted immediately upon receipt of Battens complaints. .

Jasna was subsequently arrested on 29th November 2011, when surprise, surprise, Detectives Constable James Galvin and Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon both, attended her home. They wanted to arrest her there and then, but she Jasna was so ill, it was decided to take her to hospital instead.

The Met formally denies the existence of two serving police officers misleading the Prime Minister David Cameron. 

Subsequent to her eventual arrest and charging, Jasna wrote to the Met Commissioner Bernard Hogan Howe asking, why her many complaints to the MPS had not been investigated? This she pointed out, was in total contrast to the Mets swift and immediate response to Battens complaint.

This lead to another key question, why had DC Galvin had turned up at the injunction hearing, defending Batten?

The answer, when it came, was as shocking as it was unexpected. The Mets Department of Professional Standards informed her that the Metropolitan Police Service employed no such named police officers. Shocked and alarmed she persisted and again she was told again that no such officers were employed by the Met.

She then wrote to the Independent Police Compliant Commission who after some time, wrote back, confirming, that after discussions with the Met, they too  confirmed that no such officers existed.

Jasna at this stage was completely frustrated and wrote to Mayor of London, Boris Johnson and Prime Minister David Cameron. Both men wrote to the Met and both were told, in writing, that no such officers worked for the Met.

The fact is the Prime Minister, the Mayor of London and the IPCC, were mislead and possibly willfully mislead, by the Met DPS about the existence of these two officers.

This begs they very important questions as to precise circumstances that led to two of the most senior Tory politicians in the land were provided with inaccurate and misleading information?

I can confirm in this blog that I have, in my possession, the following evidence:

1. A letter to Jasna Badzak from a third officer at the Met Police’s Directorate for Professional Standards saying that they could not investigate a complaint against officers Galvin and Reardon because they did not exist “the officers you have named as being officers of the MPS are not officers with the MPS. I have throughly interrogated all MPS systems and cannot find any trace of those officers.”

2. An email  to Jasna Badzak from the same officer dated 10 Jan, 2013, again repeating that these two officers, do not exist (following her astonished protests of disbelief, since these officers had actually shown up at her house and arrested her).

Jasna Galvin 2

3. Firm evidence that, in a phone call to Ms. Badzak, a fourth officer – this time of the rank of Inspector, I think it is important to state that – spoke to her about this matter and stated

Insp: “In 2012, I understand you attempted to make a complaint about officers Fleming, Galvin and Reardon… you made a complaint.” Ms. Badzak said she had made a complaint to the Mayor of London and the Prime Minister, who, she said, wrote to Bernard Hogan-Howe, who, she said, passed it further down. The Inspector replied “Yes”. “And I got the reply which I got which said that these police officers do not exist,” Ms. Badzak responded. “Yes,” the Inspector replied. “We made an error, and I apologize for that error.” Ms Badzak exclaimed “You made an error!” The Inspector replied “Yes. They do exist. It wasn’t correct what we told you.” Ms B: “So why did you tell me that, then?” Insp “The officer who made that decision, and told you, is on a career break, he’s not in the country, I can’t ask him why. But it may be that he misread our database. You know – sometimes people make human errors. But the bottom line is we made a mistake, I apologize, we made a mistake.

Again – Ms Badzak was arrested, November 4th, by a DS in the Major Crimes Unit, Westminster, for “harassment” of Gerard Batten, MEP, for RTing a blog in which these allegations are detailed.

Personally, I believe in transparency. I am absolutely confident of my evidence and I present it here in order that there be as little cover-up going forwards as possible. I am prepared to make my evidence available to the IPCC and other sources.

One officer threatening a journalist

A separate officer in the Major Crimes Squad arresting Ms Badzak for harassment

A third officer from the Directorate of Professional Standards denying the existence of Met Police Officers (twice, and in detail, and emphatically) that Ms. Badzak claims harassed her

A fourth officer of the rank of Inspector telling Ms Badzak that the officer who denied their existence was “on a career break” “out of the country” “I can’t ask him why” “It may be that he misread our database”

Clearly, this matter goes beyond any kind of politics to the very deepest, darkest abuses of our capital’s major police force against a private citizen. I am not an investigative journalist (thankfully, Mr Crick does have those credentials) but I recognize shocking abuse when I see it, and I hope I have enough of a sense of duty not to remain silent when I am confronted with hard evidence of injustice being done.

Post navigation

3 thoughts on “Why Was Jasna Badzak Arrested for RTing a Critical Blog about UKIP?”

  1. A search for MPS Detective James Galvin does not produce anything. He does not seem to be an MPS officer or has been retired for some time.

  2. Hi,

    I can confirm the style of behaviour of Ukip’s MEP Gerard Batten and his apparent collusion with what seems, all too clearly, to be a corrupt element of the police.

    Whether the police in question are current or ex members of the BNP or current or past members of Ukip and or other extremist groups is hard to ascertain – due largely to the clandestine nature of those concerned and their lack of transparency.

    I am able to confirm the behaviour having been investigated by police named in Jasna Badzak’s case and having been arrested and interviewed under caution on their instruction – based upon the lies or at very least distortions of fact by Gerard Batten.

    Regards,
    Greg_L-W.
    Greg Lance-Watkins
    Greg_L-W@BTconnect . com

    http://ukip-vs-eukip.com

To view the original of this GUEST BLOG CLICK HERE.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Gerard BATTEN, Jasna Badzak, Lee Jasper, Louise Mensch, Michael Crick, Nigel FARAGE, Police, Police Corruption, UKIP, UKIP Corruption | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST: Gerard Batten – Ukip MEP Further Demeans Ukip & His Office!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 06/11/2014

>GUEST POST: Gerard Batten – Ukip MEP Further Demeans Ukip & His Office!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

>GUEST POST by Louise Mensch:

Gerard Batten – Ukip MEP Further Demeans Ukip & His Office!

Not just by his own vile comments based opn his personal superstitions which are likely to exacerbate racial hatred and incite violence against those of other religious superstitions but also by his odious associates and apparent abuse of his elected office and seeming ability to corrupt justice to his own ends!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
I do not believe it is unreasonable to believe that Gerard Batten‘s behaviour is nothing less than evil – an opinion I find supported by a considered investigation of his associates and his all too apparent abuse of his public office as an elected public servant.
You will find a considerable amount of factual information regarding Gregory Lauder-Frost, including details of his criminal activities and prison sentences on this blog web site by putting his name into the >Search< facility at the head of the >Right Sidebar<
Similarly if you CLICK HERE and >Search< in the same manner on that site!
Just as you can >Search< for further facts regarding Gerard Batten and his shamefull behaviour there is also information pertaining to Andrea Williams and some of the arcane bronze age superstitions of herself and her associates in the self styled so called christian concern group, which spreads hate and evil incitement wfor those who do not share their superstitrion – unsurprisingly it would seem that Gerard Batten has links with these odious extremists colluding with them in the production of material, both publications and deliberate public utterances, likely to incite racial hatred.
I understand that Gerard Batten went so far as to utilise a Barrister, closely associated with the judge in his persecution and bullying of Jasna Badzak, who acts for these ‘religious’ extremists seeking to impose their strange views on others with the same style as the Imams they also seek to abuse!
I am all too well aware of the pernicious behaviour of Gerard Batten and his associates having been personally threatened by Gregory Lauder-Frost and arrested based upon the lies and or distortions of Gerard Batten and what seem to be his errand boys in the police force – fortunately my reputation for integrity stood me in good stead when interrogated under caution by the South Wales police leading to dismisal of Gerard Batten’s odious claims and efforts to harm me.
Just as when an agent of Ukip, their press officer Mark Croucher supported by their deputy leader Paul Nuttall and their ex press officer Clive Page who acted to try to bankrupt me with a Court case claiming over £100,000. The Court found against Ukip’s Mark Croucher and costs were awarded to me, thus Ukip has a moral obligation to refund my costs, which ran to some £13,000 + interest, being without honour or integrity and in contempt of British Justice and British Courts neither Mark Croucher nor Ukip have had the integrity to settle their undeniable debt.

Gerard Batten and the ex-BNP member, Gregory Lauder-Frost.

A Facebook link is not much to go on.

But on occasion, it can unearth a piece of an ever-clearer puzzle.  We previously covered UKIP MEP Gerard Batten’s connections to a fundamentalist group named Christian Concern: in particular, his emails to its founder, Andrea Minichiello Williams who is known for her radical beliefs on abortion (she thinks it should be illegal), the age of the earth (she says it’s 4,000 years), the Human Fertilisation & Embryology Act (she considers it “the act of the devil”) and homosexuality (she thinks it is sinful).

Gerard Batten MEP and the founder of Christian Concern, Andrea Minichiello Williams, who believes that the earth is 4,000 years old.

Equally disturbing perhaps, was Batten’s endorsement of the “Muslims’ Charter” proposed in a document written by Christian Concern’s Islamic Affairs advisor, Sam Solomon.  The Charter would involve Muslims in Europe, and ONLY Muslims, being made to sign a Charter pledging ‘non-violence’ and the renouncing of select passages of the Qur’an.  The foreword of the document was written by Batten himself.

Batten wrote the foreword to Sam Solomon's 'A Proposed Charter Of Muslim Understanding', published in 2006.

Some readers may have concluded that this disproportionate blaming of Muslims for violence in Europe would not look out of place in the British National Party.  Well readers, today’s entry is a small but not inconsequential bit of Facebook activity involving Gerard Batten and a former BNP member, Gregory Lauder-Frost. In 1992, Lauder-Frost – then a member of the Conservative Party – was convicted of defrauding an NHS health authority to the sum of £100,000.  Currently, he is the founder, Vice-President and Treasurer of the ‘Traditional Britain Group‘ – a right-wing organisation whose website claims that ‘the heterosexual family is the primary social unit’.  In terms of personnel, it is a splinter group of the notorious Conservative Monday Club that repeatedly called for repatriation of non-white Britons over a period lasting decades.

Gregory Lauder-Frost: Former BNP member and convicted fraudster.

In recent years, Lauder-Frost is perhaps better known for his Facebook rant about the peerage given to Doreen Lawrence, whom he described as a ‘nobody’ and ‘anti-white’.  In a subsequent interview to Radio 5 Live, he stood by his comments while bemoaning how the House of Lords was being taken over by ‘spivs’.

Furthermore, on the Traditional Britain Group’s Facebook page, there are comments (unmoderated) suggesting that the black British writer Malorie Blackman should be repatriated from the UK.  A comment bemoaning ‘ethnic whinging’ was actually ‘liked’ by the admin, and even Lauder-Frost himself!

Racist comments under a TBG post about Malorie Blackman, on eof which is 'liked' by the TBG admin AND Lauder-Frost's personal account.

Clearly, Lauder-Frost has not taken heed from the time Hope Not Hate revealed his anti-Semitic Facebook comments in 2012.  However, this does not appear to have deterred Gerard Batten from befriending Lauder-Frost on Facebook and letting him post on his Timeline.

Gregory Lauder-Frost communicating with Gerard Batten on Facebook.

So what does it mean?  It is a catalyst for further investigation.  In 2011, Lauder-Frost proudly announced that Batten would be the Guest of Honour at the Traditional Britain Group Annual Dinner.

Lauder-Frost waxing lyrical about the 2011 TBG Guest of Honour - Gerard Batten.

Gradually, the case against Batten begins to build.  It appears that Lauder-Frost was not a stranger to him; he was a man who trusted Batten enough to let him make a speech to his organisation.  Some say that support for UKIP often overlaps with support for the British National Party, and this is a classic example of that: a UKIP MEP meets a former BNP member who is attracted to UKIP’s disproportionate emphasis on immigration.  In case you’re interested, here is the video of Batten’s speech at the 2011 annual Traditional Britain Group dinner.

One final thing.  Junius on UKIP wrote a blog entry connecting Lauder-Frost and Batten a while ago.  Yet if you click on its URL now, you will find that the content has been removed following a legal threat made by, in all probability, Batten or one of his aides.  We do not believe that an MEP, a man elected by the public to serve and represent them, should be able to silence information that is most definitely in the public interest.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Christian Concern Group, Christian Soldiers of UKIP, CROUCHER, ea Williams, Gerard BATTEN, Gregory Lauder-Frost, Police, Police Corruption, Police State, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ukip MEP Gerard Batten’s Apparent Abuse & Corruption

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 05/11/2014

Ukip MEP Gerard Batten’s Apparent Abuse & Corruption
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Ukip MEP Gerard Batten’s Apparent Abuse of his position as an elected representative of the peoples of these United Kingdoms & Corruption of the intent of Justice and British values of free speech and the truth.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
FIRSTLY – Please accept my tardy reprtage of this obscene behaviour by Ukip MEP Gerard Batten in what seems to many, including myself, to be an abuse of his public office and a travesty under law seemingly colluded in by corrupt or at very least crassly irresponsible Police Officers – my delay is due to the fact that both my telephone and broadband access to the internet have both been of line since late Sunday/early Monday until late this afternoon, due to a fault on the BT line due to a break in their very elderly aluminium cable!

May I commend Louise MENSCH and many others for having had the perspicacity to note this obscene abuse of public office by Gerard Batten in breech of his elected position of trust for him to take advantage of his elected office to clearly collude with police of dubious morality to act on his behalf to seemingly abuse the intent of the judiciary yet again relative to anyone – in this case Jasna Badzak.
English: Gerard Batten MEP poses with proteste...

English: Gerard Batten MEP poses with protesters outside parliament (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I am happy to attest that Gerard Batten has lied to mislead the police, whether with their collusion or not I can not say, in order to try to damage me and has also acted corruptly in his carrying out and influence of Ukip Kangaroo Courts having denied an individual appearing before a Ukip internal Court to ensure a defendant was denied the right to have the most basic of right to defend themselves.
Gerard Batten’s abuse of trust and his elected office as a Ukip MEP is and has often been crass, incompetent and beneath contempt. I believe his position is of such a low grade that had Ukip ANY integrity they would demand his resignation as an MEP – howe4ver having extensive experience of the levels of corruption and bullying endemic in Ukip I doubt they have even the understanding of ethics to act with integrity.
First may I suggest that you may wish to note the comment of the professional journalist and commentator Michael CRICK from his Twitter Account CLICK HERE

Blog on which an ex-kipper – not the author, not – was arrested 4th Nov for RTing

0 replies 20 retweets 4 favorites

Former MP Louise Mensch asks Met’s Major Crime Unit why not also charge me for retweeting Lee Jasper’s Sept blog, as they did Jasna Badzak?

0 replies 36 retweets 13 favorites

Beware. Don’t RT link … Ex-Ukip member Jasna Badzak did & Major Crime Unit charged her w harassing MEP Gerard Batten

0 replies 69 retweets 17 favorites

Totally bizarre. Ex-Ukip member Jasna Badzak charged w harassment for tweet link to Lee Jasper blog on Gerald Batten

0 replies 50 retweets 9 favorites

Louise MENSCH from her Twitter Account Site CLICK HERE

‘whistleblower’ arrested for what appears to be contrived harassment charge by UKIP MEP

0 replies 7 retweets 0 favorites

EXCLUSIVE: Want to know about UKIP & how NASTY they REALLY are? Shocking stuff from Lee Jasper

0 replies 36 retweets 11 favorites

Lee Jasper writes blog detailing Met harassment of Jasna Badzak. Badzak RTs it. Met arrests Badzak, but not Jasper. What’s going on?

0 replies 6 retweets 1 favorite

Crazy: Jasna Badzack, UKIP critic arrested after UKIP Gerrard Batten MEP complains to Met Police.

0 replies 9 retweets 2 favorites

. as this evidence is evidence against the authorities I do not trust them, and prefer transparency.

0 replies 1 retweet 2 favorites

I’m a man of the left I’m supporting has potentially been the victim of a grave injustice.

0 replies 5 retweets 4 favorites

if that’s harassment the sports journalists should be arrested every Monday.

0 replies 3 retweets 1 favorite

5. Officer who threatened a journalist writing re EDL links was in Financial division. Officer who arrested Badzac for tweet Major Crimes

0 replies 4 retweets 1 favorite

4. I have seen evidence that in both cases the officers in the Met Police were in inappropriate departments, not related

0 replies 4 retweets 0 favorites

the story has been picked up by and now, weirdly, – follow for developments

0 replies 11 retweets 5 favorites

. threats that journalist should not publish a story on Gerard Batten MEP. The officer copies in Gerard Batten MEP

0 replies 6 retweets 1 favorite

The journalist threatened by the officer is neither me nor but a different journalist.

0 replies 4 retweets 1 favorite

KABOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RT

0 replies 832 retweets 575 favorites

that, by the way, is a word for word direct quote. have a major scandal developing, in my view, including false arrest.

0 replies 13 retweets 2 favorites

3. The email from officer to a journalist warns of publishing source material on “the political affairs of Mr. Gerard Batten”

0 replies 10 retweets 2 favorites

. having seen email evidence of threats to journalists over political stories on Mr Batten it is my duty to act

0 replies 6 retweets 3 favorites

…or even Lee Jasper for the original. What is going on?

0 replies 1 retweet 1 favorite

2. A demand by a DS working in Major Crimes Unit that Ms. Badzac present herself for arrest for RTing the blog even though cardiac patient

0 replies 10 retweets 1 favorite

Evidence I have personally seen: threats from an officer to a journalist preparing a story on UKIP expenses fraud

0 replies 35 retweets 7 favorites

Blog on which an ex-kipper – not the author, not – was arrested 4th Nov for RTing

0 replies 20 retweets 4 favorites

. My concern at the moment is the false arrest of Ms, Badzac. That blog is not harassment

0 replies 0 retweets 1 favorite

Criticism of your policies and actions can be very annoying, but it’s no crime. Not harassment. Not “Major Crime”.

0 replies 14 retweets 11 favorites

There’s harassment of politicians – like received – threats,racist, religious abuse. then there’s criticism.

0 replies 5 retweets 4 favorites

by the way, the officers are at fault for arresting a person for RTing a critical, but not threatening, blog about a politician. He isn’t

0 replies 3 retweets 1 favorite

Perhaps Theresa May should investigate just how riven with corruption is the Met?

0 replies 3 retweets 0 favorites

It is actually heartening that, when you see evidence of a plain miscarriage of justice against an ordinary person, politics is set aside.

0 replies 6 retweets 3 favorites

I will say that I never thought the day would come when I would ever agree with about anything.

0 replies 5 retweets 5 favorites

Wouldn’t have given it much credence if I hadn’t seen the documents, but on the other hand, I have now seen them. again.

0 replies 6 retweets 1 favorite

Interestingly, have seen evidence (an email) that the Met Police also threatened journalists preparing stories on UKIP and expenses fraud.

0 replies 25 retweets 5 favorites

A “Major Crime Unit” DS arrested an ex-Kipper for RTing this. Major Crime? “Harassing” Gerard Batten MEP

0 replies 17 retweets 1 favorite

Lee Jasper’s a tool but wtf? “: Don’t RT link Badzak did & Major Crime Unit charged her w harassment”

0 replies 2 retweets 0 favorites

Also Axelrod may now come over to UK soon to help Ed M after NEC row over salary

0 replies 6 retweets 0 favorites

NEC figures were unhappy with Axelrod’s pay / arrangements at this week’s meeting

0 replies 7 retweets 0 favorites

please r/t Poppy badges £2 ticket office Derby Nottm Leics St Pancras £35,000 raised to date

0 replies 5 retweets 3 favorites

The arresting officer works for the Met’s “Major Crime Unit”. I am awaiting to hear what “major crime” of “harassment” criticizing an MEP is

0 replies 2 retweets 2 favorites

I have asked the arresting officer why she alone was charged w”harassment” and not the author or who also RTed

0 replies 10 retweets 3 favorites

This means somebody at the CPS agreed to charge her. “Crime” is harassment. Blog makes no threat implicit or explicit against Batten

0 replies 3 retweets 0 favorites

As says, an extraordinary story is happening Gerard Batten MEP. Jasna Badzak charged w. harassment for blog Lee Jasper wrote

0 replies 13 retweets 1 favorite

Beware. Don’t RT link … Ex-Ukip member Jasna Badzak did & Major Crime Unit charged her w harassing MEP Gerard Batten

0 replies 69 retweets 17 favorites

Former MP Louise Mensch asks Met’s Major Crime Unit why not also charge me for retweeting Lee Jasper’s Sept blog, as they did Jasna Badzak?

0 replies 35 retweets 13 favorites

To ensure you can make your own judgement of the issue to hand may I suggest you read Lee Jasper’s article in full, you will find the article on the internet at CLICK HERE
My own personal experience of the lack of ethics and self serving self seeking dishonesty and general behaviour, as I have observed, of Gerard Batten leads me to believe that the well known commentator, journalist and broadcaster Lee Jasper’s article is likely to be substantively true and correct.
Please be aware that my support and concern is not JUST for Jasna Badzak in this issue but also for her seriously damaged health, seemingly largely due to the dishonesty, bullying and harrassment she has endured at the hands of Gerard Batten and certain seemingly corrupt police officers and a subourned Judiciary, but my concern is also for my Country and the apparent unsound and untrustworthy state of all too many Politicians, Police and other public servants who seem to believe they have the right to uphold or invent ways to uphold what they perceive to be the law whilst acting partially and in self interest in ignoring many criminal offences to suit themselves.
Allk too often one can all too readily believe the police act as an out of control, over equipped occupying agency acting as enforcers on behalf of causes THEY find profitable at the expense of their role as public servants, again and again being reported or seen to be persecuting some whilst turning a blind eye to the crimes of others and closing ranks to obfuscate and cover-up actions when called to account.
A sad day for British standards of justice and values.
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Gerard BATTEN, Gerard BATTEN MEP, Jasna Badzak, Police, Police Corruption, Politicians, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

From That Which I KNOW of This Case I Believe It Is Corupt

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 17/09/2014

From That Which I KNOW of This Case I Believe It Is Corupt
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&