Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

Archive for the ‘John ISON Thefts’ Category

Nigel Farage & John Ison – Evidence Of Their Collusion In Criminal Activity!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 09/07/2016

Nigel Farage & John Ison – Evidence Of Their Collusion In Criminal Activity!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name! 

.

Nigel Farage & John Ison – Evidence Of Their Collusion In Criminal Activity has been very clearly shown in Court in what seems to be the mallicious and questionable prosecution of Nikki Sinclaire!

000a ukip-025 count.png

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
this statement of opinion has been added to the article:
Nikki Sinclaire COURT CASE Exposes Nigel Farage’s Involvement
For the context of my comment: CLICK HERE

A statement of opinion written and added by myself G.L-W. Sat-09-Jul-2016:

There may well have been a statement from the defence that:

There is no suggestion of any wrong-doing by Mr Farage or any other party official.

However it is clear that at very least John Ison would seem to be in breech of his employment contract and in breech of ‘The Computer Misuse Act’ and Nigel Farage is very clearly colluding with John Ison in criminal activity – thus it would seem clear that Nigel Farage and John Ison are involved together in criminal behaviour!
It also seems very clear that Nigel Farage, John Ison and possibly others conspired together on numerous occassions in criminal activity, including unlawfull entry, and breech of ‘The Data Protection Act’ involving confidential Government information and confidential data, and in breech of ‘The Computer Misuse Act’.
As this information has been in the hands of the Police and the CPS for some years it is hard to understand on what grounds they have persecuted Nikki Sinclaire over so many years when all they seem to have by way of evidence is some 10 receipts that seem to be administrative errors yet they had very clear evidence & proof of criminality, it would seem, involving and undenied by Nigel Farage and John Ison.
It would seem that this entire farago has been to frame Nikki Sinclaire with the collusion of the Police and CPS unless one can readily accept that both the Police and CPS are both incredibly gullible and very stupid!
Nikki Sinclaire has clearly misplaced her trust in John Ison and has been betrayed by him in a criminal manner; Nigel Farage’s mallicious behaviour is seemingly equally as criminal in that he colluded in criminality of a period of time with John Ison. Steve Morson was also clearly informed of the criminal behaviour but in obvious mittigation supplied what seem to be true and honest evidence of the criminality to the Police making it irrefutable that John Ison and Nigel Farage had acted and colluded in criminality together.
End of G.L-W comment added Sat-09-Jul-2016
.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.

Posted in EU, EUkip, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Nigel FARAGE MEP UKIP, Nikkie SINCLAIRE MEP, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/07/2014

This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

 This charging of Nikki Sinclaire Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice when in the context of the €Billions the EU squanders, overpays and loses to fraud particularly relative to 29 months on bail where justice delayed is clearly justice denied!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!Hi,

You may find some of the facts below; and there many downloads and screen captures which I have supporting the opinions below; of interest IF you value campaigning for British Justice, responsible & competent police and cleaning-up Ukip to make it fit for purpose!

http://juniusonukip.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/nigel-farages-useful-idiot-john-ison.html

http://ukip-vs-eukip.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/0323-ukip-official-implicated-in-theft.html

http://markcroucher.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/07-mar-2011-ukip-john-ison-mark.html

http://markcroucher.blogspot.co.uk/

https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/category/john-ison/

Croucher/ Ison blog : http://allaboutukip.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/ms-sinclaire-and-how-she-dare-not-sit.html

On the, at the time, UKip controlled BDF:

It is believed that John Ison used to post occasionally as “Paul Beech”, which is BP backwards – Bob Pacific on blog also. It was removed (changed to Dave Briggs!) I hear this was done after it was shown to a UKIP MEP in Sept 2010!

“The Common Man” (Oh so Very common!) was MC backwards – Mark Croucher. This was verified for me by a UKIP Brussels insider (Croucher admitted it) at the time.

Mjolnir post on the subject was removed by BDF Moderators!

I can’t find an internet archive of Skeptyk’s BDF entry on the subject or his sordid and dishonest blog, and my source of screenshots have gone missing! It was December 2010, and posted Gregg Beeman’s salary details, but I doubt it was Ison as he was driving to the Alps about that time, so my guess is Croucher.

The information in the downloads was seemingly obtained in a burglary of Nikki Sinclaire’s office by John Ison and I hold a copy of the eMail he sent, containing copies of the material he obtained, some dozens of scans, obtained either by burglary or at very least dishonestly, supplied to the duplicitous and dishonest Mark Croucher – who worked as Nigel Farage’s sewer rat seeking out any material that could be used by Farage and his cronies to manipulate and control people – Notably it was Nigel Farage’s son who commented to Roger Knapman that he was the only person on whom his father did not have a (black) file!

The so called evidence against Nikki Sinclaire would seem to have been obtained by theft including burglary also recordings of phone calls recorded by John Ison and edited by Mark Croucher is also available – whether the police know that the evidence was stolen and the recordings edited I know not! However after almost 30 months on bail it is clear the police have had to drop a number of their original claims against Sinclaire & the 3 members of her staff originally bailed, as they obviously have failed to stand them up even when aided by the dishonest and self serving John Ison or anyone who worked for Farage!

There is absolutely no doubt that any errors of claiming by Nikki Sinclaire (or more likely her staff and most probably deliberate claims inserted into her accounts by third party efforts to damage her) do NOT justify the prolonged period of bail used to smear her name on the grounds of ‘Justice delayed is justice denied’!

The standards of behaviour by the police and others in these allegations give one every concern for the calibre of justice that can be expected and even a guilty verdict would not seem justice in the long run!

Clearly Justice should be seen to be done and much of the behaviour of those involved in the accusations and allegations, not to mention gathering of information and the vile gutter commentaries of a personal nature against Nikki Sinclaire by many of the low lifes associated with Ukip that this shoddy police activity has caused is a matter not of dignity or competence on the part of the police or Ukip and its associates but a slur on both the body politic and the tenets of Justice in these United Kingdoms.

It has been suggested by a retired police Acting Chief Supt. of 30 years distinguished service that:

‘….no interview / charges presented face-face + hand delivered summons (charges) (after this period on bail+ investigation) = possible’ “strong grounds for malicious prosecution charge”.

Misconduct in Public Office does carry a maximum life sentence and is presented under common law, not statute.

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/misconduct_in_public_office/#a015

An easy “catch all” – but it has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt!

May I also draw your attention to:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news…etty-cash.html

ALSO the fact that despite his many lies and efforts to deny his crimes and seek to claim they were invented by myself Derek Clark UKIP MEP was found guilty by OLAF of extensive false claims of EU expenses and was merely ordered to repay somewhere between £50K & £100,000 and seemingly no further action was taken.

In the case of Stuart Agnew MEP UKIP no action was seemingly taken to recoup the numerous £1,000s he falsely claimed as expenses as he admitted on camera to The Sunday Times nor against David Bannerman MEP UKIP (now a Tory MEP!) similarly implicated and neither have cleared their name!

Similarly UKIP leader & MEP Nigel Farage and a previous MEP leader of UKIP Jeffrey Titford were ordered to repay monies they had falsely claimed in expenses!

It is also worthy of note that Nigel Farage has also been accused of dishonest accounting having failed to declare donations to UKIP of over £200,000 and there is also still the issue of what happened to what may have been as much as £1M collected through the Ashford ‘scheme’ which he described as ‘UKIP’s best ever money maker’, however the party chairman, David Bannerman spoke on a point of orderr in reasponse to Richard Suchorzewski at a public meeting in Derbyshire, conceding that less than 15% of the money raised was ever presented to UKIP!

There was it seemed extensive money laundering in that large sums of money were processed through credit card donations which were processed through the credit card machine of Graham Booth UKIP MEP’s Hotel in Torquay!

Similarly there were many £1,000s collected in buckets and if accounted at all only loosely, as the outcome of the Court case brought against UKip by The Electoral Commission, which UKip lost, though UKip turned the issue to advantage seeking to raise the money and costs by bucket collections at a series of public events and by seeking donations. Contrary to claims the donation made by Alan Bown was clearly a breech of the rules as Alan Bown had removed himself from the electoral register as, I understand a part of his divorce proceedings when he left his wife and was co-habiting with one of his betting shop manageresses. Thus the donation was not legal!

A situation bearing many similarities to the donation UKip received some years previously when they accepted a sizeable donation from the owner of a UK football club who was not on the electoral register. UKip, without complaint, refunded the money that had been an unlawfull donation and arrangements were made by thwe donor to have it re-donated in a legal manner (in that case I believe it was by his wife who was on the electoral register) – Just as could have been done relative to Alan Bown’s donation.

Despite claims by dishonest or ill informed UKip members this was not a case of ElCom picking on UKip relative to the large donation made by an individual, subsequently found to be criminal, made to the Lib.Dims. as in that case they had carried out due diligence, even going so far as to contact ElCom for a ruling on the matter before utilising the money. I understand at the time of rec eipt of the money the individual was on the electoral register and neither the Lib.Dims. nor ElCom could have had any idea he was subsequerntly to be found guilty of criminality!

I was reliably informed, at the time of the start of this sorry debacle, that as soon as the tampering with her accounts took place and she was aware of it she immediately contacted the EU Payments Office and provided all the details she could and whether the EU Payments Office arranged repayment or merely wrote it off as being a paltry amount relative to the normal level of squandering of tax payer’s money that is endemic in the undemocratic and corrupt EU, I know not.

On these few comments alone and the links given it becomes all too apparently clear, in my opinion, that this is little short of malicious prosecution, seemingly for political gain or pure malice, of some sort, of individuals or groups of individuals and that the lack of ethical behaviour in extending the bail period from Feb-2012 (after Nikki Sinclaire herself had made public, and I believe had reported this to the police, she had reason to believe her accounts had been maliciously tampered with by a member of staff she believed had possibly made false claims and stolen from her) until this week.

Some 29 months on bail, with no further questioning and apparently no details of the police claims supplied, is little short of harassment and could justifiably be claimed as having ensured she was not re-elected as an MEP and is thus currently unemployed, technically, with a case pending which ensures she will be unable to get responsible employment until justice has been seen to be done and her name cleared – presumably with a healthy level of compensation!

Particularly as it is clearly shown and provable, in her accounts, that Nikki Sinclaire injected a sum in excess of £120,000 of her own money from salary and other personal sources also used a large sum of fully audited money, raised through donations, to fund her work and responsibilities, as she believed them to be (viz: obtaining 220,000 signatures to her petition to HM Government which was the direct and sole cause of David Cameron being forced to hold a debate of the House of Commons relative to Britain’s membership of the EU and thus the undertaking of an IN/OUT referendum, which he clearly led thwe public to believe would be binding).

It is bizarre to believe that an individual who donated a sum well in excess of £100K would then bother with some penny ante sum (by the standards of fraud in the EU by MEPs) – had she wished to gain more income a few £1.000 on mistakenly claimed travel expenses would be dwarfed by her net loss of personal monies through her donations. Even were the police able to engineer a conviction I do not believe Justice would be seen to be done and it is my opinion the entire matter is seeking to ‘get egg off the face of The police’ for having firstly believed the miscreants who would seem to have dishonestly and deliberately ‘set her up’ and for secondly having so tardily acted to bring the matter to Court even if they believe they have a case.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in British Justice, Derek CLARK, EU, EU Corruption, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Mark CROUCHER, Nikki SINCLAIRE, Stuart AGNEW, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

#0761* – A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/03/2012

#0761* – A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

.Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.
A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

As published on http://john-ison.blogspot.com earlier this morning!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

 A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

Hi,

it is interesting to note the obvious disgust at John Ison’s behaviour and revulsion at the unprofessional behaviour of UKIP leadership in their anti homosexual and vindictive treatment of Nikki Sinclaire, on a UKIP controlled Forum!

It is all but impossible for UKIP to claim it is not anti homosexual and now especially with the addition of the supporter of Tom Wise!

Roger Helmer defedtee from the Tories because he could not get his own way when he stepped down as an MEP, he who set out to try to have the deffinition of where his house was, in order to try to claim even more expenses as an MEP!

Roger Helmer recently stated his opinion that homosexuality was a treatable mental illness – surely the world left that view behind in the 1960s, when we campaigned for the decriminalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults. I should imagine The Tories are glad to see the back of this idiotic man with his arcane views and his plastic EUroScepticism as he milks the system for all it is worth TO HIM!

  1. Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Fonzarelli View Post
    Depending on which side of the Miss Sinclaire/Mr Ison ‘conflict’ one finds oneself on, one could feel that the other is only interested in smearing them.

    One could, or one could try to think beyond the purely superficial.

    In January 2010, UKIP’s NEC unwisely allowed itself to be dragged into what was basically a personal spat between two MEPs, Sinclaire and Farage.

    The correct course would have been to tell Nigel Farage that the NEC had no constitutional power to compel MEPs to join a particular group (which it hadn’t), and that any complaint about Nikki Sinclaire leaving the EFD should be submitted through the party’s disciplinary channel. That would have forced Farage to demonstrate exactly how Sinclaire had breached UKIP’s rules (if she had), provided an opportunity for mediation, and ensured that if necessary the matter be decided in the proper way by the discipline committee (from which NEC members are barred).

    Instead of which, the chairman of the NEC foolishly issued a statement Statement from UKIP chairman – UK Independence Party on behalf of the committee, announcing that Sinclaire would not be permitted to stand for UKIP at future elections on the grounds of her having left the EP group, and having “failed to declare other relevant issues to the interview panel when she was selected as a UKIP candidate” (which she denied). If Sinclaire chose to challenge this legally, as past experience suggested she might, any breach of normal disciplinary procedure or evidence of her having been treated less favourably than others in similar situations, would obviously disadvantage UKIP hugely.

    Within a matter of months, first Mike Nattrass then Trevor Colman followed her out of the EFD, yet no action was taken against them by the NEC and, unlike Sinclaire, both are still accepted as UKIP MEPs and listed as such on the party website.

    Now we see that the article linked by Alex McKee at #9 raises the possibility that the second of the accusations levelled at Sinclaire – that of failing to declare relevant issues to a candidate selection panel – may also have applied to John Ison.

    Ison stood as UKIP candidate in Redditch in 2005 and Solihull in 2010, being bound by the party constitution on both occasions to make “a written application and shall make full disclosure of any fact, political or personal, that may have a bearing on their suitability for selection as a candidate”. In 2010 the application form stated: “I am not aware of any circumstances from my past that might cause embarrassment to the party were it to be revealed”.

    Did Ison fail to declare that he had been banned by court order from seeing his children, and lie by signing the form anyway? If so, now that the story is known through circulation on the internet, the NEC will be guilty of victimizing Nikki Sinclaire if it doesn’t ban Ison from standing in all future elections just as it has banned her.

    If he did declare it and was allowed to stand despite this, the party and all its future candidates will be at risk from resulting bad publicity, but why would a party that goes to the length of demanding CRB checks on its candidates precisely in order to screen out potential problems, regard a court order protecting five-year-olds from their own father as not having a bearing on his suitability as a candidate?

    Reply With Quote
  2. #23

    Senior Member Steve Morson's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wonderful Worcestershire
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by Barboo View Post
    One could, or one could try to think beyond the purely superficial…..

    And indeed you do, Barboo. A quite stunning post, extraordinarily well-informed and astute.

    The questions it raises, which I asked myself on being informed of the archive article on the court case only recently, are for members of the party. Which is why I did not ask them publicly.

    What a mess.

    Steve
  3. #24

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Barboo View Post
    Did Ison fail to declare that he had been banned by court order from seeing his children, and lie by signing the form anyway?

    I’ve no idea what Ison has or has not declared but he was pre-UKIP a notable public campaigner for fathers rights. How have you come to the apparent conclusion that his own circumstances were not already in the public domain?

    Reply With Quote
  4. #26

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Morson View Post
    And indeed you do, Barboo. A quite stunning post, extraordinarily well-informed and astute.

    Thank you, Steve!


  5. #27

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Independent UKIP View Post
    I’ve no idea what Ison has or has not declared but he was pre-UKIP a notable public campaigner for fathers rights. How have you come to the apparent conclusion that his own circumstances were not already in the public domain?

    I haven’t come to any conclusion on the matter and that is not the point. UKIP’s constitution does not put responsibility onto candidate selection panels for acquainting themselves with applicants’ personal circumstances from what is in the public domain. It states categorically that candidates shall make full disclosure.

    If John Ison did not do so then natural justice demands that he should be treated the same as Nikki Sinclaire in what the NEC claims was a similar circumstance (failure to disclose, which she denies), and banned as she was from standing in future elections. Not to ban Ison would be a second example of Sinclaire being treated more harshly than others, the first being that action was taken against her for leaving the EFD but not against Nattrass and Colman.

  6. #28

    Uber Member Niall Warry's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    7,406

    It is very simple really Nigel doesn’t concern himself with rule books, as I’ve had experience of, by his selfish standards there is one rule for him and his mates and another for his foes.

You may be interested to note YET AGAIN that the false accusation of failure to disclose made against Nikki Sinclaire was an unprofessional pack of lies from UKIP Leadership and pure discrimination.

Nikki Sinclaire was madse technically bankrupt (ie based on the claim of one man who served p0apers at an address at which she clearly did not live as she washelping UKIP set up their head office in Birmingham!).

The details were IMMEDIATELY reported by Nikki Sinclaire to The Returning Officer in the election, in which she stood. She also informed Michael Zucherman The UKIP Part Secretary at the time.

I also published the full details at the time as they were a matter of public record, as is the fact that John Ison was not found guilty in a Court Case of assault on his wife who left him for another woman but WAS deemed unfit to have access to his children, presumably his volatile temper or underhand behaviour were deemed a risk to children.


As to bankruptcy being ostensibly a cause of the UKIP Leadership’s unprofessional and partisan behaviour the Guilty Judgement against Nigel Farage, Godfrey Bloom and UKIP inCourt would seem to indicate otherwise as would the official caution from the EU Parliament aganst Godfrey Bloom for his anti homosexual bullying.


It is interesting to note that John Ison’s vindictive and malicious behaviour against Nikki Sinclaire and his various thefts and seeming ‘construction’ of so called evidence, in collusion with others (including the proven corrupt Christopher Gill see: CLICK HERE) may all be a vindictive attack based on John Ison’s seemingly very ‘challenged’ sexuality and unhappy marriage!


Nikki Sinclaire’s treatment at the hands of UKIP’s partyisan and unprofessional leadership can not be on the grounds of her historic bankruptcy reported at the time, despite the clamourings of Nigel Farage’s sewer rat Mark Croucher who we KNOW colluded in what seems clearly to be efforts to set Nikki Sinclaire up to curry favour with Nigel Farage!


I say it can not be based on the irrefutable fact that Niel Hamilton the formerly disgraced Tory MP was courted by Farage and joined UKIP some 5 years ago and is now, we understand, promised a leading seat as a contender for election to public office once more and as is also a matter of record he was bankrupt and was recently boasting of it on national TV.


Perhaps Niall Warry was correct that in the corrupt world of UKIP:
It is very simple really Nigel doesn’t concern himself with rule books, as I’ve had experience of, by his selfish standards there is one rule for him and his mates and another for his foes.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com  
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<  
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
eneral Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World WideofOUR-ENEMY-WITHIN&To Leave-The-EU 

. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World WideofOUR-ENEMY-WITHIN&To Leave-The-EU  
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Barboo, Ho, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Niall WARRY, Nikki SINCLAIRE MEP, osexual, Roger Helmer, UKIP anti Homosexual, UKIP Bullying, UKIP Leadership Corruption | 1 Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: