Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • December 2022
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Posts Tagged ‘Electoral Commission’

The Fine Levied On Nigel Farage Did At Least Prove His Guilt

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/10/2014

The Fine Levied On Nigel Farage Did At Least Prove His Guilt
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

The Fine Levied On Nigel Farage, by the Electoral Commission, for failure to declare some £30K+ Did At Least irrefutably Prove His Guilt

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
although ignorance of the law is ostensibly no defence and this must be considered to be particularly the case when the ignorance is displayed by those who ostensibly make the law and draw 100s of £1,000s from the public purse for legal and professional advice to have made no issue of the matter and placed a tokenry fine on Nigel Farage was probably the most sensible action on the part of the Electoral Commission.
It does seem that during the period in question Nigel Farage had no intent to defraud in this instance being a matter of a mere 30 or 40 £1,000 – he had far more pressing issues to deal with as he boasted to a Press lunch he had made a profit of around £2million on his expenses during that time and he was after all clandestinely paying his wife around that sum each year, from Ukip resources, not to mention it would seem using selected members of the Ukip & EFD the staff as publicly funded personal entertainment.
It was also during the same period thata sum possibly approaching £1Million was raised by the Ashford scam (declared by Farage to be ‘Ukip’s most successful funding scheme ever’) and that money just seems to have vanished in the ether, as with many other unaccounted sums.
I believe that a clear statement of Nigel Farage’s guilt in this instance, as was shown by the fine, was adequate and I also note acceptance of that guilt was clear in that the fine was promptly paid. This is on its own adequate pending a full forensic accounting of where so many £Millions of public money has VANISHED as is the duty of the Police and other law enforcement agencies to ensure that those in public office act in a transparent and ethical manner providing clear accounting of what happens to tax payers’ money, that of donors and the public purse – I look forward to the acquital of their duty by the Police and revenue authorities in relation to the huge area of suspect behaviour by Ukip, particularly over financial matters!
OR
Could it be that there are those in the Police, HMRC, SFO and similar bodies who have succumbed to bribes in one form or another to orchestrate a cover-up, for little or nothing seems to be being done to bring these people to justice when clearly there are a significant number of people who believe their actions to be criminal.

Nigel Farage fined £200 for breaching electoral laws

The UK Independence Party leader has been fined by the Electoral Commissoin for failing to declare tens of thousands of pounds worth of free office space.

Nigel Farage

Ukip leader Nigel Farage has been invited to join a leaders’ TV debate Photo: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images
 

Nigel Farage has been fined £200 for breaching electoral laws.

The UK Independence Party leader has been fined by the Electoral Commissoin for failing to declare tens of thousands of pounds worth of free office space.

The electoral watchdog found that the failure to report the “regular non-cash donation of the free use of office premises from a donor, Mr John Longhurst”.

It said: “The failure to report had been ongoing since 2001 and has been independently valued as rising from £3,500 to £3,800 per year over this time.”

Mr Farage has paid the fine, the Commission said. The Commission said that the office was for his own use.

Under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 all non-cash donations of more than £1,500 must be reported to the Commission.

Although the donations had not been reported to the Commission, they had been properly reported to the European Parliament by Mr Farage.

The Commission is satisfied that there had been no intent to hide the donations.

The Commission also said that the Conservative party had forfeited a £28,000 impermissible donation from a company called Henley Concierge Limited.

A Ukip spokesman said: ​”The Electoral Commission wholly accept that Nigel Farage sought professional advice and followed it in good faith and that the use of the office was not concealed.

“They therefore concluded that Mr Farage was ‘honestly mistaken as to [his] obligations’. Nigel has paid the fine and the matter is now settled.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Ashford, Electoral Commission, Nigel FARAGE, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/07/2014

This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

 This charging of Nikki Sinclaire Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice when in the context of the €Billions the EU squanders, overpays and loses to fraud particularly relative to 29 months on bail where justice delayed is clearly justice denied!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!Hi,

You may find some of the facts below; and there many downloads and screen captures which I have supporting the opinions below; of interest IF you value campaigning for British Justice, responsible & competent police and cleaning-up Ukip to make it fit for purpose!

http://juniusonukip.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/nigel-farages-useful-idiot-john-ison.html

http://ukip-vs-eukip.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/0323-ukip-official-implicated-in-theft.html

http://markcroucher.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/07-mar-2011-ukip-john-ison-mark.html

http://markcroucher.blogspot.co.uk/

https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/category/john-ison/

Croucher/ Ison blog : http://allaboutukip.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/ms-sinclaire-and-how-she-dare-not-sit.html

On the, at the time, UKip controlled BDF:

It is believed that John Ison used to post occasionally as “Paul Beech”, which is BP backwards – Bob Pacific on blog also. It was removed (changed to Dave Briggs!) I hear this was done after it was shown to a UKIP MEP in Sept 2010!

“The Common Man” (Oh so Very common!) was MC backwards – Mark Croucher. This was verified for me by a UKIP Brussels insider (Croucher admitted it) at the time.

Mjolnir post on the subject was removed by BDF Moderators!

I can’t find an internet archive of Skeptyk’s BDF entry on the subject or his sordid and dishonest blog, and my source of screenshots have gone missing! It was December 2010, and posted Gregg Beeman’s salary details, but I doubt it was Ison as he was driving to the Alps about that time, so my guess is Croucher.

The information in the downloads was seemingly obtained in a burglary of Nikki Sinclaire’s office by John Ison and I hold a copy of the eMail he sent, containing copies of the material he obtained, some dozens of scans, obtained either by burglary or at very least dishonestly, supplied to the duplicitous and dishonest Mark Croucher – who worked as Nigel Farage’s sewer rat seeking out any material that could be used by Farage and his cronies to manipulate and control people – Notably it was Nigel Farage’s son who commented to Roger Knapman that he was the only person on whom his father did not have a (black) file!

The so called evidence against Nikki Sinclaire would seem to have been obtained by theft including burglary also recordings of phone calls recorded by John Ison and edited by Mark Croucher is also available – whether the police know that the evidence was stolen and the recordings edited I know not! However after almost 30 months on bail it is clear the police have had to drop a number of their original claims against Sinclaire & the 3 members of her staff originally bailed, as they obviously have failed to stand them up even when aided by the dishonest and self serving John Ison or anyone who worked for Farage!

There is absolutely no doubt that any errors of claiming by Nikki Sinclaire (or more likely her staff and most probably deliberate claims inserted into her accounts by third party efforts to damage her) do NOT justify the prolonged period of bail used to smear her name on the grounds of ‘Justice delayed is justice denied’!

The standards of behaviour by the police and others in these allegations give one every concern for the calibre of justice that can be expected and even a guilty verdict would not seem justice in the long run!

Clearly Justice should be seen to be done and much of the behaviour of those involved in the accusations and allegations, not to mention gathering of information and the vile gutter commentaries of a personal nature against Nikki Sinclaire by many of the low lifes associated with Ukip that this shoddy police activity has caused is a matter not of dignity or competence on the part of the police or Ukip and its associates but a slur on both the body politic and the tenets of Justice in these United Kingdoms.

It has been suggested by a retired police Acting Chief Supt. of 30 years distinguished service that:

‘….no interview / charges presented face-face + hand delivered summons (charges) (after this period on bail+ investigation) = possible’ “strong grounds for malicious prosecution charge”.

Misconduct in Public Office does carry a maximum life sentence and is presented under common law, not statute.

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/misconduct_in_public_office/#a015

An easy “catch all” – but it has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt!

May I also draw your attention to:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news…etty-cash.html

ALSO the fact that despite his many lies and efforts to deny his crimes and seek to claim they were invented by myself Derek Clark UKIP MEP was found guilty by OLAF of extensive false claims of EU expenses and was merely ordered to repay somewhere between £50K & £100,000 and seemingly no further action was taken.

In the case of Stuart Agnew MEP UKIP no action was seemingly taken to recoup the numerous £1,000s he falsely claimed as expenses as he admitted on camera to The Sunday Times nor against David Bannerman MEP UKIP (now a Tory MEP!) similarly implicated and neither have cleared their name!

Similarly UKIP leader & MEP Nigel Farage and a previous MEP leader of UKIP Jeffrey Titford were ordered to repay monies they had falsely claimed in expenses!

It is also worthy of note that Nigel Farage has also been accused of dishonest accounting having failed to declare donations to UKIP of over £200,000 and there is also still the issue of what happened to what may have been as much as £1M collected through the Ashford ‘scheme’ which he described as ‘UKIP’s best ever money maker’, however the party chairman, David Bannerman spoke on a point of orderr in reasponse to Richard Suchorzewski at a public meeting in Derbyshire, conceding that less than 15% of the money raised was ever presented to UKIP!

There was it seemed extensive money laundering in that large sums of money were processed through credit card donations which were processed through the credit card machine of Graham Booth UKIP MEP’s Hotel in Torquay!

Similarly there were many £1,000s collected in buckets and if accounted at all only loosely, as the outcome of the Court case brought against UKip by The Electoral Commission, which UKip lost, though UKip turned the issue to advantage seeking to raise the money and costs by bucket collections at a series of public events and by seeking donations. Contrary to claims the donation made by Alan Bown was clearly a breech of the rules as Alan Bown had removed himself from the electoral register as, I understand a part of his divorce proceedings when he left his wife and was co-habiting with one of his betting shop manageresses. Thus the donation was not legal!

A situation bearing many similarities to the donation UKip received some years previously when they accepted a sizeable donation from the owner of a UK football club who was not on the electoral register. UKip, without complaint, refunded the money that had been an unlawfull donation and arrangements were made by thwe donor to have it re-donated in a legal manner (in that case I believe it was by his wife who was on the electoral register) – Just as could have been done relative to Alan Bown’s donation.

Despite claims by dishonest or ill informed UKip members this was not a case of ElCom picking on UKip relative to the large donation made by an individual, subsequently found to be criminal, made to the Lib.Dims. as in that case they had carried out due diligence, even going so far as to contact ElCom for a ruling on the matter before utilising the money. I understand at the time of rec eipt of the money the individual was on the electoral register and neither the Lib.Dims. nor ElCom could have had any idea he was subsequerntly to be found guilty of criminality!

I was reliably informed, at the time of the start of this sorry debacle, that as soon as the tampering with her accounts took place and she was aware of it she immediately contacted the EU Payments Office and provided all the details she could and whether the EU Payments Office arranged repayment or merely wrote it off as being a paltry amount relative to the normal level of squandering of tax payer’s money that is endemic in the undemocratic and corrupt EU, I know not.

On these few comments alone and the links given it becomes all too apparently clear, in my opinion, that this is little short of malicious prosecution, seemingly for political gain or pure malice, of some sort, of individuals or groups of individuals and that the lack of ethical behaviour in extending the bail period from Feb-2012 (after Nikki Sinclaire herself had made public, and I believe had reported this to the police, she had reason to believe her accounts had been maliciously tampered with by a member of staff she believed had possibly made false claims and stolen from her) until this week.

Some 29 months on bail, with no further questioning and apparently no details of the police claims supplied, is little short of harassment and could justifiably be claimed as having ensured she was not re-elected as an MEP and is thus currently unemployed, technically, with a case pending which ensures she will be unable to get responsible employment until justice has been seen to be done and her name cleared – presumably with a healthy level of compensation!

Particularly as it is clearly shown and provable, in her accounts, that Nikki Sinclaire injected a sum in excess of £120,000 of her own money from salary and other personal sources also used a large sum of fully audited money, raised through donations, to fund her work and responsibilities, as she believed them to be (viz: obtaining 220,000 signatures to her petition to HM Government which was the direct and sole cause of David Cameron being forced to hold a debate of the House of Commons relative to Britain’s membership of the EU and thus the undertaking of an IN/OUT referendum, which he clearly led thwe public to believe would be binding).

It is bizarre to believe that an individual who donated a sum well in excess of £100K would then bother with some penny ante sum (by the standards of fraud in the EU by MEPs) – had she wished to gain more income a few £1.000 on mistakenly claimed travel expenses would be dwarfed by her net loss of personal monies through her donations. Even were the police able to engineer a conviction I do not believe Justice would be seen to be done and it is my opinion the entire matter is seeking to ‘get egg off the face of The police’ for having firstly believed the miscreants who would seem to have dishonestly and deliberately ‘set her up’ and for secondly having so tardily acted to bring the matter to Court even if they believe they have a case.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in British Justice, Derek CLARK, EU, EU Corruption, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Mark CROUCHER, Nikki SINCLAIRE, Stuart AGNEW, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

A Snippet of FACTUAL COMMENT on UKIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 10/11/2012

A Snippet of FACTUAL COMMENT on UKIP
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

A Snippet of FACTUAL COMMENT on UKIP, made on a public Forum controlled by UKIP, by Geoffrey Collier!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
in reading this snippet of factual comment, let us remember that Geoffrey Collier is one of UKIP’s many long standing members who wage a long drawn out battle to clean up UKIP, eradicate the endemic corruption, seek to introduce ethics and professionalism and generally make UKIP fit for purpose.What is important to remember is that not only is he still a member of UKIP, (which I have NEVER been) though there is little doubt this is based on hope over experience, he was one of UKIP’s most successful Branch Chairmen EVER – both in the gain in size of his branch, the size and the income generated by his branch.

It must be with some embarrassment and a great deal of sadness that he comments as he does – seeing his hopes for an independent Britain so exploited and befouled by UKIP’s leadership clique and their claque of liars, cowards & fools at and close to the top.

“It may be wise for Mr McGough to remember that it was his friend Andrew Smith who provided evidence to the Electoral Commission which assisted their case against UKIP in obtaining a conviction for accepting impermissible donations.

That same Mr Smith considers that he has the necessary qualities to become a Police Commissioner. Sadly, this is the background against (which) we labour for our cause.

The EU budget debate has collapsed; and we have candidates in police commissioner and parliamentary by-elections next Thursday.

Does the level of debate which we have on this thread suggest that important matters are afoot? If Mr McGough is a sound example of the NEC members, can we expect to remain a serious source of talent to extricate this nation from the E.U.?

People have worked hard for years against the consequences of ‘being in Europe’, only to see corruption, stupidity and ignorance frustrate their efforts from the very same NEC which supposed to be offering leadership.

UKIP has a good case; a good membership, but moral and intellectual poverty among the leadership. That cannot be seriously doubted”.

Geoffrey Collier is far from alone in his sadness at such an unprincipled and self serving betrayal by the scoundrels who have taken control of the party that so many of us had high hopes of. It is that dishonesty, self serving self enrichment and total lack of honour or ability amongst UKIP’s leadership and its claque that drives many of us to STILL try to clean up UKIP and effect a root and branches prunning of the dead and corrupt matter in the party.Even in forest management to TRY to control die back harsh remedial action and constant copicing is required – Politics is no different as disease and corruption are prone to become endemic in pursuit of the favoured places at the troughs on the gravy train and like rats in a corner those feeding at the troughs will take any dishonest, corrupt, sordid and dispicable action to keep their snouts in the trough it would seem.

Farage makes much of his desire to see Denis McShane in prison for his corruption of the public purse but let us consider the extent of self enrichment Farage has indulged himself in from that same purse be it paying his wife £30K a year, travelling widely for pleasure whilst6 failing to acquit his duties of leadership, transparency and professionalism.

Let us not forget Farage wittingly borrowed stolen money from Tom Wise to settle his own debts and it was not repaid. Let us not forget that Nigel Farage has never been able to show where over 85% of the monies raised by Ashford vanished (UKIP’s most successful fund raiser HE called it!), nor has Farage ever shown where over £1/4Million vanished, seemingly trousered, obtained from the public purse for a petition that was never carried out.

Let us also note that Nigel Farage was, like Denis McShane, found guilty of obtaining money from the public purse and using it for unacceptable purposes – Farage himself was ordered to repay some £11,000 thus purloined!

More recently Derek Clark lied, cheated and abused the system to the tune of over £30,000 which he was forced to repay – Farage has failed to censure this theft or the lies surrounding it nor has he issued an apology for the behaviour of the liar and low life Derek Clark or UKIP staff for the lies about myself, my blog or that of other UKIP supporters making efforts to expose the corruption & make UKIP fit for purpose.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Embarrassingly for UKIP Andrew SMITH stands for PCC

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 09/11/2012

Embarrassingly for UKIP Andrew SMITH stands for PCC

.

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

.

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

.

Embarrassingly for UKIP Andrew SMITH stands for PCC ln Essex!

The calliber of the candidates would seem to indicate the irrelevance of the office & the self enrichment potential it offers!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

Just one week until Essex Police Commissioner elections on November 15

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, November 08, 2012

Essex Chronicle

Follow

pollingstation

Andrew Smith, UKIP, 63, from Epping. He has a degree in economics and statistics and is a qualified chartered accountant.

He said: “It gives me the experience to deal with the huge budget cuts facing Essex Police, which are not going to go away anytime soon. I want Essex Police to be trusted by the public and to refocus on the side of the victims.”

http://bcove.me/g940y7se

.

  • Profile image for Greg_L_W

    by Greg_L_W

    Thursday, November 8 2012, 10:28PM

    “Hi,

    do not forget that Andrew Smith as the nominal treasurer of UKIP legged it, unable or unwilling to answer some 29 simple questions about the accounts and left the accounts in disaray with boxes of unexplained receipts & no work done.

    It was also the thoroughly duplicitous Andrew Smith who eMailed UKIP chums as to how they could/should deliberately dupe The Electoral Commission in a seeming act of fraud and electoral criminality.

    It was also Andrew Smith who seized control of a UKIP committee and placed a proven liar & cheat on it as his main defender!

    It was also Andrew Smith who engineered the departure of a UKIP employee who threatened his apparent scams.

    It was also Andrew Smith who failed to show that less than 15% of the money raised in a UKIP fund raising scam reached the party.

    I appreciate the irrelevance of these PCCs and their lack of control for their £85 to 100K incomes but even so a man of so little integrity as Andrew Smith would not even be able to pretend to ethical values!

    Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the Exit and Survival Plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits when we Leave-The-EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples – they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our borders.

They also have a duty to put in place contingency plans for the collapse of The EUro & The EU or the wishes of the peoples of Britain to Leave-The-EU.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for over 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the Main Stream Media and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING, at very best if they ALL agreed they would then  still have less than a 10% say in the governance of Britain by The EU.

Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING towards that unanimous promise!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01594 – 528 337

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS: ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning to Leave-The-EU for these United Kingdoms and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country & minded that membership of The EU is sucking out the life blood and identity of our Country in a counter patriotic manner and at a cost in hard cash of some £53 Million a day we must consider:

Denying the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs and the no longer relevant MPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour.

Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples, by the peoples of our Country.

It is time that the entire mechanism of governance in these United Kingdoms, which has so clearly failed our Country and our peoples, was radically overhauled and updated to democratic status – failure to change will mean when we Leave-The-EU and/or it finally collapses, as it surely will, we will be no better off as the self same self styled, self enriching clique will be all too willing to betray us as they have done relative to The EU and its fore runners.

To achieve change support rational planning as with The Harrogate Agenda and similar thinking of gravitas.

Demand a Royal Commission on the cost benefits of leaving The EU and of remaining its vassals with a clear ‘Exit & Survival Strategy‘ for implementation OR responsible contingency planning dependent on THEN holding a Referendum on IN or OUT to Let-The-People-Decide!

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&
To Leave-The-EU
  
 


Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Seems Mike Nattrass has finally Quit UKIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 13/08/2012

Seems Mike Nattrass  has finally Quit UKIP

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Seems Mike Nattrass  has finally Quit UKIP – having quite some time ago rejected the pretence at leadership of Nigel Farage he and Trevor Colman quit his sordid extremist EFD Group of racists, xenophobes and EUroPhiles seeking reform & rewards!!

.
PLEASE NOTE UPDATE 15-Aug-2012 11:00hrs.:
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
I had always believed only a clown would try to ride two horses – first we had the gullible fool Robert Kilroy Silk who fell for the lies of Nigel Farage, who promised him leadership of UKIP, to get him to support the party – A promise not within Farage’s ‘gift’. For a brief period RKS tried to ride two horses but ended up falling off both.
Similarly we had the liar and fraud David Bannerman currying favour with both The Tories & UKIP to gain a seat as an MEP – Farage grabbed at the publicity  but Bannerman seeing his lies had worn thin and with an OLAF inquiry into his fraudulent use of public money fled to The Tories seeking preferment for his betrayal.
Bannerman will shortly find having betrayed one party and then the other he ends up rejected by both as dishonourable, duplicitous, corrupt and totally untrustworthy.
Now, despite other such clowns willing to ride any horse to be on the gravy train such as Marta Andreassen, who touted herself around various parties and lied to get herself on the gravy train.
Let us consider Mike Nattrass!
He Does Have Some Political Sense
I’m told!
I note after various efforts to drag UKIP’s reputation in the mire he did have one act of integrity and refused to follow the demands of his Party leader Nigel Farage and quit the vile Pan EU EFD Political Group with its racism, xwenophobia, criminals, anti Judaism, anti homosexual and other extremist practices.
There was hope that Mike Nattrass was finally acting honourably and would be thrown out of UKIP together with his chum, the near invisible and utterly irrelevant self serving Trevor Coleman as clever Trevor had also stood down from the odious Farage group.
Nikki Sinclaire had acted exactly the same but shown leadership in quitting the group and was thrown out of UKIP – however it was later established in Court that this was more a matter of anti homosexuality, petty jealousy and inadequacy on the part of Farage, Bloom and UKIP – so found the Court!
UKIP, Farage & Bloom were found guilty and you may well remember the published apology to Nikki Sinclaire in an effort to deffer High Court Action by her against these named individuals and organisations.
Were Nattrass & Coleman banned from the party – NO, there was a classic act of different standards Sinclaire was banned from the party but whether due to gender or some other terms the same punishment was not meter out to Coleman or Nattrass, and nor it seems was such a stance taken against the Spanish MEP when she openly called for Farage’s resignation in an open letter on the grounds of his incompetence that had led to the catastrophic results he achieved in the local elections!
Now I note Mike Nattrass isn’t even a member of UKIP he has opted out with a wimper rather than a fanfare of integrity – he has quietly moved on and is now the leader of another party and clearly he can not lead one party whilst being a member of another – this is even clearer an effort to hedge his bets than Oddly Ratkinson’s position with his own group when he made a bid to become leader of UKIP!
I was interested to note Mike Nattrass’ new party as listed on The Electoral Commission’s web site at:
If YOU find the Commission’s web site too beset with jargon and interlinking pages perhaps this screen capture will help:

So its official then!

Mike Nattrass has betrayed the electorate and quit UKIP but seems not to have been man enough to tell people – do we now expect some half baked threat of legal action claiming that I have libelled him like the fool he made of himself threatening The Sunday Times when they published the details of him being under investigation by OLAF, which he was!

Just as Mike Nattrass is listed as leader of his own political party.

Presumably he has conveniently forgotten to inform his electorate and maybe not even his staff!

I wonder what Nigel Farage’s view on this little chaps having set up in opposition is!

I doubt Mike will think it worth coming back from his long summer holiday in his villa in Portugal, where he spends much of his time rather than work in his constituency to Leave-The-EU, to promote his new party.

I wonder, in view of the name of Mike Nattrass’ new party, whether when he does emerge to do some work if he will follow the example of Nigel Farage and try to piggy back on the efforts made by Nikki Sinclaire to ensure a full debate on the aim to Leave-The-EU in Parliament or the gathering of a consequential number of signatures to keep the concept of an IN / OUT Referendum to Leave-The-EU.

Of course had UKIP been fit for purpose it might be wise to force the issue of a referendum rather than just keep embarrassing the government and keeping the flame of self determination, as a fundamental human right, alight – as Nikki Sinclaire most clearly has.

Is Nattrass hedging his bets to try to steal Sinclaire’s achievements to which he has, in fairness, contributed public money he had access to but beyond that his study in fence sitting seems over with his new party!
Clearly due to the abject failure of UKIP, particularly without competent, trustworthy or professional leadership, the chances of winning an IN / OUT Leave-The-EU Referendum are very low.
UKIP has failed to get the message out to the electorate and in 20 years have failed to even provide the reassurance of a sound exit and survival strategy – UKIP under Farage’s misguidance has even allied itself with extremists in EU politics who amongst other things welcome membership of The EU and seek to make some reforms!
I look forward to reading Mike Nattrass’ new party manifesto – it should be quite funny with his mangled English and endless anger at anyone who dares to question him or his lack of logic!
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

UPDATE 15-Aug-2012 11:00hrs.:

Nikki Sinclaire has NOT been thrown out of UKIP merely forced out of her elected office of UKIP MEP and lied about, bullied and attacked by UKIP leadership and its parasites.
Nikki Sinclaire now sits as an Independent MEP and NOT a UKIP MEP and is thus to all intent and purpose thrown out of UKIP though her membership continues all be it in name only.

I gather there are claims that Mike Nattrass is similarly still a UKIP member though he too sits as an independent MEP independent of UKIP with Nikki Sinclairte & Trevor Coleman.

I understand Mike Nattrass, presumably to maintain Farage’s income is allowed to set up and register a political party in opposition to UKIP – or as UKIP would claim of anyone seeking to Leave-The-EU but not under their rather sordid banner of corruption and lies – A Spoiler Party!
(as the UKFirstParty was deemed; despite its honourable intentions to provide an open honest and accountable democratic party to Leave-The-EU without the corruption that is omni present in UKIP & for some rendered UKIP unfit for purpose such that an alternative was clearly needed, particularly with liars and cheats like Mick McGough, David Bannerman etc. in The Eastern Region – Though I question how successful they were in the light of the involvement of Peter Cole, Tom Wise & Bruce Lawson or the undertakings of Trevor Colman, though most of the others would seem to have been unaware of this and of honest intent.)

Clearly whatever the paperwork may claim it is clearly dishonest for UKIP to claim Nattrass & Sinclaire are members in anything but name, as they with Trevor Coleman have rejected the leadership of UKIP, and refuse to sit with UKIP or associate with UKIP’s extremist, racist, anti Jewish, anti homosexual and anti Islamist group which includes various individuals with criminal records for assault, Holocaust Denial and similar offences and a number who have been found guilty of fraudulent use of public money and/or are still under investigation for same.

Please accept my apology for stating the realities rather than the minisculism and pedantry of the internal machinations of UKIP & misleading detail 😉

On the same logic let us remember that Tom Wise UKIP MEP was similarly NEVER thrown out of UKIP and despite what were outright lies from Nigel Farage, repeatedly made on the media – Tom Wise remained in UKIP as a member, and was asked by letter to renew his membership in the February of his last year as an MEP, responding with a written refusal, which we have published elsewhere on our blogs.

My failure to provide every last detail will clearly be misrepresented by the liars and scoundrels in UKIP to desperately imply I have deliberately lied – I apologise for stating the facts in insufficient detail and clearly there was no intent to mislead, as the detail did not materially alter the facts.

G.L-W.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

#117* – The EUkip Filth & The Edmond Kangaroo Court (01)

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 12/11/2008

#117* – The EUkip Filth & The Edmond Kangaroo Court (01)

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

MORE EVIDENCE OF EUkip LEADERSHIP’S UNDERHAND CORRUPTION!

Hi,

you may well have read my earlier blog or my eMail Newsletter, in which I stated that I was in receipt, from someone closely associated with EUkip’s sordid leadership claque the text regarding their planned Kangaroo court hearing, which was to be a part of Nigel Farage’s Reichstag Fire moment – engineered it would seem to try to give a corrupt cabal amongst the leadership the excuse to seize draconian power.

Still in the rather foolish belief that amongst that which had floated to the top of the EUkip septic tank might be something of decency & morality, with some understanding of British values and Justice! – I refrained from publishing the vindictive and vile compilation trumped up against Dr. Eric Edmond by the undeniably dishonest, fraud and liar David Bannerman, no doubt in obeisance to his venal and vile master and their corrupt associates.

I now publish below the full text as shamefully drawn up by the sad failure Bannerman and endorsed by the proven corrupt NEC only one of whom spoke out in disgust at this behaviour, Drs. Abbott & Edmond having already left in disgust, disassociating themselves from the undeniably dishonest and corrupt behaviour boasted of by the sleazy drunken womaniser Nigel Farage. Farage had admitted, seemingly with no realisation of the enormity of his actions, that he had set-up and tricked one of UKIP’s most loyal and decent long term supporters Martin Hasslam, who has so consistently given generously of his money and hugely of his expertise and time (in the misguided belief that supporting this evil that is EUkip of today was, in some way, patriotic!).

It is unlikely that anyone of integrity will not see through the disgusting lack of morality in this so called ‘Submission For Disciplinary Action’, drawn up by the discredited David Bannerman as the first in a series of reprehensible kangaroo courts.

Bannerman was supported in his dishonesty by Farage’s self seeking puppet, the odious NuttAll parachuted in unelected as a ‘Puppet Chairman’, when Dr. Wittacker’s disgust at the dishonesty of the NEC finally boiled over and he quit – the last straw it seems was being forced to sign a letter claiming the foul mouthed Annabelle Fuller had resigned and the pack of implausible lies about taxi drivers and Morocco peddled to cover for her criminality!

Read on – there is a huge amount more yet to come:
STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIALA SUBMISSION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION
AGAINST DR ERIC EDMOND

Presented on request of the NEC for discussion at the
November NEC meeting

Introduction

The NEC has the power under the Party Constitution to expel or suspend a member of the NEC for ‘unbecoming conduct’ under Articles 7.18.4. The intention of this clause is to exclude any NEC member who behaves in such a way as consistently to disrupt the NEC and prevent it from conducting its business in a proper, efficient and orderly manner. This ongoing conduct thereby proves him or herself to be unfit to continue as an NEC member.
By offering Dr Edmond the opportunity to speak at the last NEC and by deferring discussion of the matter to a future NEC, and by providing a copy of this paper in advance to Dr Edmond, the NEC has sought to act reasonably and fairly under the Constitution.

The motion agreed at the 8th September NEC was: “That in view of the indication by Dr Edmond that he wished to have the opportunity to prepare to meet any charges against him, and in view of representations by various NEC members that they wish to have the opportunity of putting forward their own complaints against Dr Edmond, David Campbell Bannerman was invited to prepare a submission for disciplinary action against Dr Edmond under clause 7.18 of the constitution to be heard at the next NEC meeting and with proper notice of at least 7 days being given to Dr Edmond of the content of that submission.”

1. The Charge of ‘Unbecoming Conduct’ Against Dr Eric Edmond, with supporting evidence.

The majority view of the NEC is that Dr Eric Edmond has been a consistently disruptive influence on the NEC since he was elected, and that his behaviour needs to improve markedly if he is able to continue as an NEC member. The facts show a clear pattern of disruptive and abusive behaviour, and of contempt for the NEC and its members. This is clear from the evidence cited below:

1.1 Threats to go outside the NEC, and support for police action

Dr Edmond has made serious threats against the NEC. For example, he said in

an e mail of 25th July “If you persist in this I will have to seek remedies outside the NEC.”

Dr Edmond supported John West’s recurring attacks on UKIP, including seeming to encourage unjustified attempts to instigate police action against the party. In his e mail of 13th August he says to John West and John Whittaker “I urge him to do so as quickly as possible so the police can get on with their investigation as quickly as possible”.

1.2 Aggressive personal behaviour

Even at his first NEC, on 7th April, Dr Edmond engaged in an aggressive attack on the Leader and his style of leadership. He again attacked Nigel Farage at the 14th July NEC regarding Nigel’s use of the Political Committee for political decisions (despite this being made clear as its purpose in the Constitution, and owing to a need to make quick political decisions). Mr Farage explained forcefully that the reason was a lack of trust in the NEC owing to past leaks.

Dr Edmond also engaged in attacks also on Douglas Denny at 14th July NEC, calling him an “idiot”, when Mr Denny objected to Edmond’s slanderous remarks against Christopher Gill (see below).

In an e mail to Douglas Denny of 2nd September, Edmond rudely says. “you are raving again.” This was in response to Mr Denny making reasonable comments which ended in the observation: “All I have seen so far, is a constant tirade [by Dr Edmond] against the “leadership” of UKIP and what appears to be deliberate disruption and promotion of discord in the NEC. What is your agenda ? It does not appear to me to be what you told the membership.” and in an e mail of 4th September from Edmond, “your reply is rubbish”. As Lisa Duffy made clear in her e mail of 28th September: “The only angry raised voice has been Dr Edmond”.

1.3 Bringing the Party into disrepute, by writing to a body UKIP is
engaged in a legal dispute with, to make wild and damaging accusations

Dr Edmond has written to the Electoral Commission in the middle of a legal case against the party by that same organisation.

He wrote to Mr Franks of the Electoral Commission on 10th September saying: “I gather you are the investigating officer in charge of investigating alleged financial improprieties at UKIP with a case currently under judicial review. I was expelled from UKIP NEC on Monday. I am deeply concerned about my financial liabilities as while on the NEC party officials stone walled over answering questions on financial matters and in one case gave a completely untruthful answer.

“I copy to you my letter to the residual NEC as record of the date and content of my request for financial information as UKIP leaders usually ignore awkward but important questions. I am not sure who legally is currently chairman of UKIP Whittaker or Nuttall as the Monday meeting was improperly convened but Whittaker seemed to chairing the meeting.”

He also claimed in his e mail of 10th September “I will of course also be seeking guidance from the Electoral Commission as to the propriety of all financial and other transactions made during my term of office”.

It is difficult to accept that Dr Edmond has the interests of the party at stake when he acts this way. He was seeking to do major damage to the cause of UKIP. This alone is enough for a complaint to the disciplinary committee.

1.4 Slanderous Comments made against Christopher Gill at the NEC meeting of 14th July 2008

At the 14th July meeting, Eric Edmond challenged the suitability of Christopher Gill to act as Returning Officer, given that as a Tory MP “he did not even make it as a PUSy (Parliamentary Under Secretary)”, the lowest grade of Minister. He did this despite the fact that Christopher Gill was not present at the meeting, and therefore not able to defend himself.

Nigel Farage said that this remark was not nice, and below the belt, as many MPs are not just in Parliament for Ministerial positions and serve their constituencies well.

Eric retorted that no, “it is due to a lack of talent”.

David Campbell Bannerman commented that this remark was slanderous, and urged Dr Edmond to withdraw it. He refused to do so. Douglas Denny said it was actionable.

At the subsequent NEC of 8th September, Mr Campbell Bannerman inquired whether Dr Edmond had apologised subsequently to Christopher Gill, and Christopher confirmed no such apology had been received.

At that NEC, Dr Edmond claimed that he had not made the remarks, but many members of the NEC commented that he was wrong, and that they had a clear recollection that these remarks were made, as stated.

Whilst fair criticism is of course acceptable, this kind of unpleasant and libellous abuse in front of Christopher Gill’s peer group, and without him present to defend himself, is not acceptable conduct by an NEC member.

1.5 Breaches of NEC confidentiality

Dr Edmond has broken strict NEC confidentiality rules. For example, in an e mail of 13th August to Robin Page, Dr Edmond reported: “I have expressed my
dis-satisfaction with this to our leader but he replied the NEC leaked so much he could only have people he could trust on his Political Committee.” This was a discussion at an NEC meeting and was confidential to that meeting. NEC rules clearly state that breach of confidentiality can lead to instant dismissal from
the NEC.

Yet Dr Edmond also displays rather a contempt for confidentiality. In his e mail of 30th September he dismisses breaches of NEC confidentiality as “unproven” and to raise such concerns as an “allegation that smears us all”. This is despite consistent evidence of leaks – as Rachel Oxley states in her e mail of 30th September, “It really is stating the obvious to say the e mail correspondence of the NEC is being passed on as we see our comments reproduced in part or in full in the e mail circulation list of Greg Lance Watkins and on Anthony Butcher’s forum.”

1.6 Support for a disruptive attempt by John West to sit on the NEC

Eric Edmond encouraged John West to believe he had a right to sit on
the NEC, even though there is no ‘ladder’ system in operation for the NEC
(leading to the next highest voted candidate taking a free place) and there was no vacancy, as confirmed by an NEC discussion and vote on 8th September. As a result John West was sitting in at the NEC meeting on 8th September and had subsequently to be asked to leave, as he had no right to be there.

Dr Edmond at the NEC denied he had encouraged West to attend, yet he supported his case at the NEC of 8th September and in his e mail of 30th August, he said: “UKIP Constitution requires 12 elected members. There are currently only 11. John West, the 5th placed person in the last NEC election therefore should be on the NEC. Can you please send him an invite to this effect ?” and in his email of 31st August he argued: “John West has a democratic mandate to fill our vacant NEC slot.. but he is democratically entitled to sit on the NEC.”

This was done without the courtesy of checking the rules with the Party Secretary nor discussing the matter with the Party Chairman, and was done in an aggressive manner. This is the comment made to a former Party Secretary Douglas Denny in e mail of 1st September: “If you persist in trying to thwart the democratic process you make us the same as the EU” and another of same date where he says “it is silly for you to try and deny democratic process for Mr West and invoke it for your own ends.”

Latterly, he has compounded his abusive approach by calling in an email of 20th. September for the Party Leader to be barred from the NEC owing to an OLAF inquiry, the Deputy Leader to resign, for John West to take his place, and with an attack on the Treasurer and MEP Candidate Marta Andreasen.

1.7 A recurrent attempt to undermine faith in the MEP selection process

Eric Edmond is entitled to his views and to criticise the conduct of Party business or the MEP selection process as an NEC member. However, his conduct goes way beyond a legitimate holding to account.

Eric Edmond has supported every single complainant regarding MEP selection in his e mails with enthusiasm – John West, Robin Page, Lynnda Robson, Gerard Batten, Victor Webb, Chris Hudson, Rollo Reid.

He makes grossly exaggerated claims in an e mail of 19th August that “This is the latest in a succession of allegations of improprieties in the MEP election process. We have a situation where rules and due process are being ignored at all levels of the party, emails from NEC members to those involved in running the election are not replied to, legal actions are in progress and someone who were told had resigned for an unforgivable breach of confidence is now allegedly back performing the same functions but with a murky contractual relationship with UKIP. A general state of anarchy prevails and the leadership produce no evidence to the NEC to support their actions. I support your call for to scrap the election… (and for) an emergency NEC.” The vast majority of regions and candidates have been satisfied with the process, even where their ambitions have been sadly disappointed, and yet Dr Edmond seeks to stop, destroy and invalidate the entire process.

Factually, Edmond ignored the guidance regarding closing dates and did not bother to confirm this with the party before stirring the issue up outside the NEC.

In an e mail of 15th August he claims “Messrs Page & West seem to have a strong prima facie case that there were not given fair treatment in our MEP selection process and I request this be put on the NEC agenda for discussion at our Sept meeting. Page’s case seems to be strong as UKIP did extend the closing date for nominations in Wales and possibly other regions as well. West’s case is also strong and potentially far more damaging as it has elements of malicious intent.” Never did he acknowledge that West had clearly libelled Jeffrey Titford MEP, Stuart Gulleford and the Deputy Leader in advance of his YouTube posting (and which was not at all acceptable), nor that West had even gone to the police to make these false accusations.

Even after notice of disciplinary action was given, Dr Edmond was still unquestionably supporting Mr West. In an e mail of 28th September, Edmond says, “John West has not used any foul language and addressed the NEC in mild
and moderate language.” John West never “addressed” the NEC, he was merely asked why he was attending the meeting, and then asked to leave whilst this was discussed. Dr Edmond further claimed in his e mail of 29th September that a firm but polite response from Douglas Denny to continued harassment by email by West was “offensive and threatening”.

This support is despite the fact that West’s malicious charges to the Essex police have been formally dismissed as having no substance whatsoever.

Then Edmond enthusiastically embraces Victor Webb’s complaints. In a 20th September e mail about Victor Webb he proclaims “He seems to me to have a prima facie case for a complaint”, asking the Chairman to have Mr Webb at the NEC in person, as he did with John West.

An e mail of 30th July attacks the South West process, stating that “Rollo Reid, the chairman of the nearby Christchurch branch and one of our best activists was not selected as an MEP candidate whilst Julie Harrison, Graeme Booth’s niece who had only been in the party one week according to the SWCC figures was selected ! I pointed out to the SWCC at which 3 members of the selection committee were present how demoralising this decision would be for our activists. Was Mr Gill party to this decision ?”.

As early as 11th June Dr Edmond was declaring in an e mail that “I heard a rumour that the £250 MEP nomination fee had been waived for some candidates. As a candidate myself I have an obvious interest. Do you know if there is any truth in this rumour?”

And at the NEC meeting on 9th June, Edmond supported the issue of the Fenland branch and Len Baynes, who had attacked the Regional Organiser for Eastern, Peter Reeve, and which they had unfairly tried to deselect as a Prospective Parliamentary Candidate.

As for the selection process, Dr Edmond raised a motion at the NEC of 14th July for the South West demanding the region has its own, independent voting system using the Electoral Reform Society, claiming people have “a lack of faith in the integrity in voting on MEP candidates”. This was despite the fact no other region has requested a different voting process, and that the Returning Officer Piers Merchant is not only known to be very fair but is from the South West himself. Edmond also boasted of disrespect for the Deputy Leader from some in the South West. The motion was defeated.

Dr Edmond did attend the MEP vote count at Head Office in person and sought to test the voting system there, only to find that the device he used proved the process was robust and the results exactly the same as his.

1.8 Inconsistent and inaccurate public statements

Dr. Edmond has made a number of inaccurate statements, within the NEC and outside of it. As cited above, he insisted he did not make slanderous statements about Christopher Gill, when this was raised at the 8th September meeting, even though this was the clear recollection of the majority of NEC members.

Even after the disciplinary warning Dr Edmond has continued to make a series of inaccurate statements as to the facts whilst regularly claiming “I just tell the truth” (in his e mail of 28th September). His version of events once again is at complete odds with the recollection of the majority of the NEC, which he consistently denies. In his email of 28th September, for example, he says:
“Your statements… about what happened at the 8th Sept NEC are highly misleading and distort the truth”.

Dr Edmond claimed at the 8th September NEC itself that it “was not a properly constituted meeting of the NEC” and that the new Chairman was not authorised by the NEC, even though the Party Leader had explained he had called and had agreement from a required number of NEC members before the Party Conference announcement.

Dr Edmond has also claimed several times, including to outside audiences, that he was “illegally expelled” from the NEC when he had not been. But in spite of this, in his e mails of 20 September he asks to be placed on the NEC agenda 5 items, which he is only entitled to do as an NEC member, and asking for NEC seconders.

This inconsistent position is amplified in his e mail of 28th September, where he again claims that “there is no doubt in my mind, to Delroy Young or the listeners outside that I was expelled from the NEC.”

Lisa Duffy clearly records the accurate and majority view of the events in her e mail of 11th September, “Once you were back in the room John Whittaker then informed you of the motion put forward and asked you if you would like to address the meeting in response. Dr Edmond I clearly recall that you said No John I would not, I am going to leave the meeting and prepare my defence and speak to my legal team in Freshfields. At NO point were you expelled or suspended from the NEC. At this present time you remain an elected member of the NEC and your response will be heard at the next NEC meeting.”

Douglas Denny recalls in his e mail of 10th September “I remember well your voluntary leaving of the NEC meeting – which I highlighted to the members of the meeting when it occurred. You were in a position to engage in the proceedings, which you refused. Despite your refusal, you are being given further reasonable time and dispensation to engage in this issue I understand.”

Rachel Oxley made similar observations in an e mail of 12th September:

“The circumstance of Dr Edmonds’ leaving the NEC meeting on Monday 8th September are exactly as described by Lisa Duffy, Christopher Gill and Doug Denny. It was his express wish to leave in order to obtain legal advice before giving the NEC his response… Doug Denny remarked that Dr Edmonds had left the meeting of his own volition as he felt that it should be noted. The Forum frequented by some UKIP members and former members contains a rather different version- in which the NEC behaved disgracefully in expelling him etc.”

She added further comments in an 22 September e mail: “It is interesting, isn’t it, that Dr Edmonds should suggest agenda items and propose motions for our next meeting despite his having personally informed at least one British Democracy Poster (Sponplague) that he is no longer on the NEC, following his alleged ‘expulsion’. He appears to be wanting to have his cake and eat it too, in gaining the sympathy & kudos that his alleged shoddy treatment by the NEC will bring, whilst still wishing to dominate the agenda.”

This is in contrast to claiming he was “asked to leave the NEC by Chairman John Whittaker” in an e mail of 20th September, and in a 10th September e mail declaiming “my outrageous, unjustified and illegal expulsion from the NEC”.

1.9 Unreasonable demands for unrelated information

In his e mail of 10th September, Dr Edmond demands a range of documents, said to be for his legal defence as to his proposed expulsion, but which have nothing to do with the charge of ‘unbecoming conduct’. They include details of the Party’s financial transactions April to September 2008, issues around Alan Bown’s court case constituting a further donation, and financial donations from the Ramsgate Call Centre for 2007/08. These demands he then copies to the Electoral Commission, to cause further trouble.

Proposed Motion to the NEC

In conclusion, in light of this evidence of unbecoming conduct by Dr Eric Edmond as an NEC member, the following motion is put to the next NEC on 3rd November 2008:

MOTION:

‘That in the light of Dr Eric Edmond’s unbecoming conduct as an NEC member, both during NEC meetings and through relevant e mails and other communications, that under Article 7.18.4 of the UKIP Constitution, Eric Edmond be suspended immediately as a member of the NEC, and remain suspended for the next three NEC meetings post the 3rd November NEC meeting. After that suspension period, Dr Edmond will be allowed to reapply to attend future NEC meetings, but will only be accepted back after a majority decision of the NEC and by Dr Edmond providing a suitable written undertaking to behave in a responsible and dignified manner during NEC meetings and through his other UKIP activities. Any breach of that undertaking would lead to the automatic and immediate resumption of his suspension from the NEC, through a further motion.’ 

I doubt readers of ANY integrity will be astonished to note not just the fundamental dishonesty of Bannerman in drawing up this rather childish and indubitably vicious attack – There is something skin crawlingly similar in the behaviour displayed by Bannerman & his supporters to William Golding’s ‘Lord of The Flies’ but with Kafkaesque overtones of ‘The Trial’.How any honest man could accuse Dr. Eric Edmond of ‘Bringing EUkip Into Disrepute’ in the light of the serial shamefull behaviour of EUkip’s leadership and NEC – much of which has been exposed in the media:

Drunken, Racial Abuse, Abuse of The Data Protection Act, Assault, Adultery, Consorting with Prostitutes, Fraud, Embezelling, Money Laundering, Lies, Dishonesty, Failures of Accounting, Lack of Probity, Lack of Transparency, Hypocracy etc. etc.Then we note that in terms of ‘Bringing EUkip Into Disrepute’ David Bannerman himself has colluded in & profitted from corrupt elections and has for many years lied on a serial basis about his ‘so called’ ancestry and fraudulently and dishonestly gained his present appointment based on undeniable lies, fraud and his claimed Father’s ownership of a desk!

It is astonishing that the ONLY member of the NEC to seek Justice and Honesty with the integrity to and courage to speak out was Delboy Young – It is not that I am astonished at Del’s integrity and courage, it is that I am disgusted at the lack of integrity and corruption of all others who were present, who have thus heaped ordure on their own heads and indubitably ‘Brought EUkip into Disrepute’.

I am particulary astonished that Christopher Gill once a Tory MP so demeaned himself and brought shame on his head after an otherwise honourable if lack lustre contribution to Justice and Democracy over many years – it would seem that even on reflection his conscience has not caused him to speak out in the face of such evil – Shame on Christopher Gill who at least should have set some example to these sordid people.

I shall be returning to this Kangaroo Court that is clearly something of a Kristall Nacht with its false flagged lies so very redollent of The Reichstag Fire used by Hitler to seize absolute control and set aside The Constitution as it is clear Farage’s Brown Shirts are so pliantly doing to their eternal shame, as they selectively and out of context quote people and the Rule Book.

I shall address the shame of each and every paragraph, in the context of the eMails quoted and those who bear false witness. I shall also address the shameful behaviour one at a time of each and every individual present and participating in this revolting witch hunt.

I shall also, at my convenience, publish a recording I hold of the NEC – most likely together with other damning material in the run up to the EUropean Elections of June 2009 – to ensure that these United Kingdoms are never again represented by such shamefull people or disgusting acts.

Should you doubt these people are that evil just read my posting #116* if you read nothing else.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST– since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: