Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

Archive for the ‘Marta ANDREASEN MEP’ Category

Farage drags UKIP into his gutter of corruption & obfuscation

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 24/04/2014

Farage drags UKIP into his gutter of corruption & obfuscation
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Nigel Farage drags UKIP into his gutter of corruption & obfuscation, in undeniable contempt for his own & UKIP’s promises of transparency and accountability – Mocking UKIP members & tax payers alike.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
that this editorial article is written by seemingly the ex UKIP MEP & current Tory prospective MEP Marta Andreasen somewhat debases the value of the commentary made as if it is she one should remember she is a liar, a fraud, a fantasist and a cheat who was dumped by The EU as a book keeper and subsequently sought to pass herself off as Chief Accountant and a self proclaimed whistleblower counter both all the evidence and also the fact that she lost her Court Case over the matter!
It is unfortunate that the broadly accurate article was not written by someone of repute, integrity and ethics, as in this instance it is no less accurate despite the nature of the reporter!

Farage is making a mockery of EU allowances

Politicians should have receipts for all payments from taxpayers

Marta Andreasen
Published at 12:01AM, April 23 2014
Are parliamentary allowances different from expenses? This is the debate that has been taking place after revelations about how Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader, allegedly misused his office cost allowances and Maria Miller, the former Culture Secretary, over-claimed on her expenses.
I do not think there is a difference. The public will not make a distinction either. Politicians represent the people. Taxpayers pay for their allowances or expenses through taxes. Whether the money is deposited before or after the invoice is raised, or the amount is fixed or not, is irrelevant.
Whenever taxpayers foot the bill, their right to expect that their taxes are used “legally and regularly” — that is, according to the rules — is beyond question. Nor is there a doubt about their right to expect full transparency and accountability from those who represent them.
The European Parliament pays allowances and does not require invoices but it does have rules. An MEP cannot just, as Mr Farage said, “spend it as he sees fit”: the money is not there for champagne nor is it a free credit line or a salary top-up.
Setting aside Mr Farage’s shrill defence that he sees himself as a taxpayer-funded freedom fighter, another much more fundamental issue arises — the conflict of interest of those involved with the EU.
When I was the European Commission chief accountant back in 2002, I came to the conclusion that it is the aim of the EU bureaucracy to keep beneficiaries of EU funding happy — this includes organisations in the member states, MEPs and civil servants — so that they keep supporting “the project”.
I tried to reform the system — to insist that no payments are made without documentation to justify them — but was instead pressured to sign off on accounts and payments known to be wrong. When I did not sign, I was sacked.
The problem for Ukip’s leader is that he has been making his livelihood out of the European Parliament for 15 years. He is now running for another five years. That is why it irks me to hear him talking about himself as anti-establishment. He has, after all, been paid out of the public purse. He has become part of the establishment that he attacks, which is deeply hypocritical.
To view the original editorial artticle CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Fraud | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Marta ANDREASEN’s Unlawfull Election by: Lynnda Robson

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 01/05/2012

Marta ANDREASEN’s Unlawfull Election by: Lynnda Robson
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.
Hi,In the light of a reminder on a UKIP controlled Forum, corruptly owned and managed by Anthony Butcher a parish councillor and wannabe in Long Ashton Bristol, I am reminded of the following details and MUCH more can be read about the discreditted Marta Andreasen at CLICK HERE .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Marta ANDREASEN’s Unlawfull Election by: Lynnda RobsonClean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable! 

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership
& NEC is what gives the remaining 10%
a bad name!

 

The Court Judgement against Marta Andreasen in full can be viewed at CLICK HERE

That Marta Andreasen is clearly corrupt, blatantly dishonest and utterly discredited has never been in contention – that EUkip have exploited her dishonesty seems obvious and that the liars, cheats and low lifes can expect reward as a part of The EU scam is clear for all to see!

Marta Andreasen is unfit as an MEP for these United Kingdoms and brings shame and contempt on the due process of EUkip’s own legally constituted rules and so called Constitution. It is clear that EUkip lack the moral compass to find their way home let alone lead anyone forward!

Hi,

let us not forget what Lynnda Robson of UKIP who worked for the odious Gerard Batten in his offices in London had to say about Marta Andreasen in the context of elections:

Lynnda Robson – aide to Gerard Batten MEP – warned Farage, Christopher Gill and the NEC. They ALL ignored her:

I am writing about numerous breaches of the Rules for Candidates by three
candidates in London. One of them is Ralph Atkinson, but I will not go
into details as I know Gerard Batten has already informed you about his
activities.The other two are Marta Andreassen and Tim Worstall who I
believe should be disqualified from this election. I am aware that Marta
has decided to run in SE Region but believe that she should be
disqualified in London and her votes reallocated since she was not
entitled to them.


This is quite a long email, I’m afraid, but there are an awful lot of rules being broken.

The reasons I believe they have both breached the rules are as follows:

1. Eligibility (external, under Electoral Commission Rules)

Under Section 4, Becoming a Candidate, of its European Parliamentary Election Rules, Elcom says that candidates must be:

Quote:

A British citizen…. or a citizen of another member state who is resident in the UK or Gibraltar during the nomination period.

Both
Marta and Tim are clearly not UK residents. When asked about this at
the London hustings Marta airily replied she was ‘addressing’ this
issue. Some people I spoke to afterwards interpreted this (possibly
cynically, but in the light of recent developments perhaps not) as
roughly meaning ‘ if I get a high place on the list I will find an
accommodation address in the UK for the minimum time necessary to meet
Elcom criteria’. Tim has apparently said he will move back to the UK
‘soon’. Seems odd since he is reportedly a tax exile who can only spend
183 days in the UK and he is building a house in Portugal for himself
and his family and they are currently all resident there.


Christopher
Gill’s response to this was that he had not bothered to consult Elcom
or check its rules as this was an internal election – unbelievable!


One
would hope that UKIP will not be a party to any breach of certainly the
spirit, if not the letter, of the Electoral Commission rules but
according to Christopher Gill: ‘At a later stage all candidates will of
course have to comply with whatever electoral legislation is then in
force or otherwise be disqualified from standing’ which seems to confirm
the cynics’ idea that an accommodation address will be found for them
for the minimum amount of time necessary.


2. Eligibility (internal, under UKIP rules)

Under
its constitution UKIP restricts full membership to UK citizens and
resident foreign nationals. It also requires its Parliamentary
candidates to be fully paid-up members in good standing.


Marta could therefore not possibly be a full member at the time her nomination was made and must therefore be ineligible.

Christopher
Gill says she is an Associate Member but cannot tell me exactly how
many other Associate members we have in the Party and indeed how many of
them there were before Marta was given this (possibly) unique status.


Certainly
nowhere on the membership application form is there an option to become
an Associate Member. The UKIP constitution also states (16.4) ‘All
parliamentary candidates must be paid-up members of the Party in good
standing…’ – no mention of associate members there, I see.



3. Same Proposer

Marta
and Tim had the same proposer – Lord Pearson. This is expressly
forbidden but Christopher Gill has told me categorically he is not
prepared to take any action as he felt ‘Lord P. was only being helpful’!
Apparently breaking rules is OK if it is Lord P. doing it for Marta and
Tim!


4. CRB checks

All candidates were mandated to have a
full, advanced CRB check (not something vaguely similar in another
country, but the full UK version). Indeed, £41 of the £250 deposit was
for this purpose. So important are these checks considered to be when
identifying suitable candidates that the London Assembly candidates list
was delayed for two months last year because of the requirement by the
leadership, at a late stage, for all candidates to have these checks.
You will all recall Nigel Farage stressing the importance of these
checks and saying that if we had them in place in 2004 they would have
picked up Ashley Mote’s transgressions – therefore it was imperative
that all candidates must have them in 2008.


But to have a CRB
check you need a UK address at which you reside and for which you can
produce utility bills. Once again neither Tim (who I believe can only
spend a certain amount of days in the UK, which would indicate he is
non-resident for tax purposes) nor Marta (who lives in Barcelona) would
have been able to obtain a UK advanced CRB check as neither is resident
in the UK. Why was an exception made for them?


Very odd reply
from CG to this one ‘Marta has never made any attempt to hide the fact
that she lives in Barcelona’!! and ‘Tim lives in Bath’. However, TW told
me that although he owns a flat in Bath this was rented out and he was
living in Portugal with his family.


5. Candidates standing in more than one Region

It
was clearly required that candidates make it clear, both at the
hustings and by other means, if they are standing in more than one
Region. Marta certainly didn’t mention it at the London Hustings, nor is
it in her published candidate details. Many of these members who might
otherwise vote for a certain candidate would be far less inclined to do
so if they knew he/she actually considered our Region second best.


Christopher
Gill’s response was: ‘The point you make about declaring an interest in
another region is well made – in a message to all MEP Interview Panel
Chairmen dated 10th July David Challice highlighted the fact that the
onus was upon candidates to publicly disclose if they were standing in
more than one region. This instruction seems to have been ignored in at
least one other region to my certain knowledge and will feature in my
report’.


What use is ‘featuring in his report’ going to be? The damage has been done and another rule broken.

I
know that the fact the shortlists were published on the UKIP website
should apparently have enabled members to do some detective work and
identify who was standing in more than one Region – but again this does
not seem to comply with the spirit of the rule or why it was made, as
very few of our members ever look at the website, let alone delve deeply
into the members section, and I doubt one in a thousand of our
‘ordinary’ members, as opposed to those of us more involved with the
Party, is aware of multi-region candidates.


6. Electoral Roll number

All
candidates were required to give their UK electoral roll number on the
application form. Unless they have given a false address, neither of
these candidates can possibly be on the UK electoral register.


Christopher
Gill acknowledges this is a problem for MA which should have been
noticed and addressed earlier, although he contends that TW is a UK
resident (wonder if HMRC know this?) but again refuses to take any
action.


From this litany you will realise why many of us are
extremely sceptical about the validity of these two candidates. At every
turn it would appear that exceptions and accommodations are being made,
and rules broken and ignored, to get them on, and keep them on, the
candidate lists. I would appreciate a full explanation of why they were
exempted from the stringent criteria that the rest of us had to comply
with in order to be considered and would ask the NEC to disqualify both
of them.


To paraphrase George Orwell: ‘Why are some candidates
more equal than others?’ I am absolutely sure that if when I had applied
I had said :


I’m not a UK resident
I’m not a fully paid-up member of UKIP
I can’t get a CRB check
My proposer has also proposed someone else
I’m not on the UK electoral Register; and
I have no intention of mentioning I will be standing in two Regions

I believe I would have been very firmly rejected – and rightly so.

Such
chicanery will not play well with Elcom or our other enemies in the
media and the community at large. And there are a number of people
already aware of these facts, and upset about them. Indeed some of these
questions have already been asked on the Democracy Forum – whose
members number many who most certainly do not wish us well – so are thus
in the public domain . This really could badly damage our chances in
the 2009 elections and we should not be putting ourselves in this
position.


I would formally ask the NEC to disqualify these two candidates from standing in London Region.

Please
do not think I have anything personal against Marta – on the contrary,
my limited acquaintance with her has always been a pleasure. And Tim
seems a personable sort of fellow. But rules are being broken and
distorted to keep these two candidates on the list and this is simply
WRONG.I have already informed Christopher Gill that should this request
be ignored then I wish to withdraw from the London list, and whilst I
will do everything to ensure Gerard is elected I will not campaign or
fund-raise if Atkinson, Andreassen or Worstall remain on the List.


I
have also told him that I want my £250 returned as this has obviously
been taken from me under false pretences. The false pretext in this case
being that all candidates would be treated equally and subject to the
same rules, which is patently not the case.
Ends.

After
being sued in the Court for the return of her £250 deposit UKIP paid
her the money, plus costs. However, they refused to admit liability and
said that they were returning her deposit “as a gesture of goodwill”.This
is, of course, complete nonsense. UKIP returned the deposit because
Lynnda asked for documents, including a copy of Marta Andreasen’s
application form and a copy of her £250 cheque and CRB documentation. It
is thought these may not have existed in a form which would have
satisfied the Electoral Commission or UKIP’s Constitution.

Tim
Worstall’s application form would have proved interesting reading since
he was a tax exile living in Portugal and, therefore, could not be a
full member of UKIP, legally pay his £250 donation OR get a CRB check.

For more details of the dishonesty & corruption of UKIP’s selection process including the outright lies and cheating of Mick McGough see: CLICK HERE

Regards,

Greg L-W.

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

 

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

 

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

. . .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
Alternate & Future Site: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<
 Also:
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Marta ANDREASEN Court Judgement, Marta ANDREASEN MEP, UKIP, UKIP Corrupt Elections, UKIP Corruption | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

#0610* – UKIP Leadership Lacks Any Competence

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 01/08/2011

#0610* – UKIP Leadership Lacks Any Competence

 Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  
.
~UKIP Leadership & the Jackasses they have gathered around them Lacks Any Competence or understanding of Professionalism!

They lack probity, transparency, leadership, vision, plan, strategy, tactics or even basic ethics!

UKIP are currently clearly unfit for purpose – liars, cheats, rogues and nere do wells interested ONLY in their personal gain and prepared to lie and stab eachother in the back for profit!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

one has to wonder just how such a shower of crass incompetents and liars as UKIP under its present duplicitous and befouled leadership team can be so unprofessional and so dishonest and yet so hugely enrich themselves without a single one of those who remain as UKIP MEPs making ANY donation of substance from the Millions they control save a few £1,000 towards their own personal re-election.

Just one year’s pension, which they will all receive annually for their whole retirement, outstrips their financial commitment to UKIP!!

Havimng warned UKIP in many postings and with a full blog of details at CLICK HERE set up to keep UKIP and the media informed after many vile outbursts from Mario Borghezio, Umberto Bossi, Timo SoinniMorten Messerschmidt, Francesco Speroni, and the rest of the extremist pond life Farage considers suitable allies for UKIP.

I guess it is little wonder that only the scum of The EU would want to be associated with the liars, cheats, bullies and low lifes in the leadership of UKIP self serving scum like David Bannerman, Derek Clark, Marta Andreasen, Godfrey Bloom, Mick McGough, Annabelle Fuller, Stuart Agnew, Tom Wise, Mark Croucher and sadly for all his dapper insecurity and lack of any officer qualities the self enriching, self serving Nigel Farage who has happily condoned the extremist racism, outright xenophobia, vile anti homosexuality, sordid anti Judaism, violence and advocacy of murder by members of The EFD Group he co-chaired for the money!

Having condoned and colluded with the criminality of The EFD it was only when this blog and Junius were finally picked up on what we have been saying all along and the story went international in the press that Farage reacted with his mealie mouthed attempt at damage limitation CLICK HERE

On the 28th. I received an unprofessional and idiotic letter from one of Farage’s muppets but whereas I had received substantive confirmation of the other facts I had received Steve Crowther’s letter from an anonimised source and I never publish material I can not prove and trust – however now that the letter showing the complete untrustworthy and unprofessional nature of UKIP has entered the public domain – I feel it is safe to publish:

Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011
Subject: Norway
From: sjcrowther@btinternet.com
To: sjcrowther@btinternet.com; sjcrowther@btinternet.com; sjcrowther@btinternet.com; jkelly8543@aol.com
CC: gawain@gmail.com; duncanbarkes@hotmail.com

Dear All

NIgel Farage has issued the following statement today:

“As co-president of a Group in the European Parliament that stands for Freedom and Democracy, I find Breivik’s actions and ideology of hatred totally repugnant. Anybody who would try to praise the political ideology of this mass murderer is morally and politically misguided.”

UKIP dissociates itself from the remarks of Mario Borghezio – as has the Lega Nord itself. The Lega Nord is considering the issue, and we will await the result of their deliberations before discussing implications for the EFD.

Regards, Steve.

Stephen Crowther, Executive Chairman, UK Independence Party
Eastacombe House, Heanton Punchardon, Barnstaple, N Devon EX31 4DG.
Phone 01271 813844. Mobile 07775 787579. 

The response from Mike Nattrass at least shows I am not alone in believing UKIP to be utterly unprofessional untrustworthy, duplicitous and crass:

From: mike nattrass
To: NEC3 ; john kelly
CC: gawain ; duncanbarkes
Sent: Thu, 28 Jul 2011
Subject: RE: Norway

Sorry Steve.

But your email below is a classic.

Most UKIP MEPs are currently seen as “Birds of a Feather” in a Mickey Mouse Group of Nutters (including way out Italian Nutters) called the EFD Group and we are about to vote for the next stage …. more of it (Pan European Parties) … on Nigel’s recommendation.

Nikki, Trevor and myself have left the Group (detailing the records of these people) and David Campbell-Bannerman could take no more …… yet we are voting on PEPPs. Am I missing something here? Is this the destruction of UKIP we are looking at?

I would like to laugh but the members are starting to cry.

Mike

MIKE NATTRASS MEP

Is it any wonder the British electorate see UKIP as little more than a comedy act?


Do remember it was not just Mario Borghezio in The EFD that praised and or condoned the actions of Anders Breivik and do remember that when a spokesman of The EFD was published as advocating killing North African immigrants UKIP & Farage stayed silent and continued to represent The EFD in Parliament and share offices, committees, travel, 400 budget and other perks of supporting The EU.
It was not until his position with his snout in the trough was threatened by Press comment around the world that the duplicitous Farage emerged full of ‘p*ss & wind’ and made a statement! – How on earth did UKIP get embroilled in this mess, some may ask, simple they prostituted UKIP taking the money and lept into bed with anyone who would have them and thereby have probably destroyed UKIP’s credibility for ever!
Let us hope in this act of betrayal there is still hope and it leads to the clean-up of UKIP with a new leadership and the removal of the filth stacked high from the shoulders of which the present leader struts and preens.
If UKIP does not remove between 50 & 100 of its leadership and leading parasites within the next couple of months then it is clear they are unfit for purpose and a part of the problem with no sign of being a part of the solution.
Now let us look at actual elections after 18 years:

Sadly for Britain in many ways this is a true reflection of what the British public think of UKIP in terms of domestic politics.

Ok a generalisation but UKIP usually gets between 2 and 8 percent WHERE IT STANDS in domestic elections.

In EU elections where the British electorate are well aware that MEPs are as much use as a soup sandwich and only there for the ride on the gravy train – unable to effect anything whatsoever – the electorate use the system to show their contempt.

Little wonder that when opposition to the EU is raging and Westminster has betrayed these United Kingdoms that UKIP manages, largely based on dishonesty, to get MEPs elected.

Yes dishonesty – you will remember the pure and outright lies told by Mark Croucher, Marta Andreasen, Nigel Farage, Stuart Agnew, Derek Clark, David Bannerman and others including dishonestly rigging elections and selection processes and inventing BNP fantasies – to get ANYONE selected and elected.

The result in Stanmore Park with a bare 2% with 48 votes is lets face it a true reflection of UKIP under its present leadership, as it squabbles and postures with not a single solitary MEP of integrity left as they prostitute the party by association with the utter slime of EU politics in The EFD and now wish to help The EU destroy National politics by enriching themselves in a PEPP!

Little wonder that out of 19,500 seats this bunch of low lifes have never managed to get more than 30 elected at any level!

Am I being unfair?

I think not – just how could UKIP’s greatest achievement be getting the much vaunted Mare of Ramsay wow – control of little more than a village council with less than 10,000 inhabitants amongst the 60 Million + of Britain.

Declared as being on a roll we note the true role was total disaray with Bufton refuding to participate in the elections as Farage invented assinine policies on the hoof without consultation because lets face it he has an NEC of liars, cheats, fools and idiots.

The results were across Britain so catastrophic even his great placement the liar and fraud Marta Andreasen called for Farage’s resignation!

The outcome is clearly reflected in Stanmore Park on the 28th. – Published for the world to see on Google Alerts on the 29th.:

Mariilyn Ashton, Conservative, 1395
Niraj Dattani, Labour, 509
Eric Silver, Independent, 299
Sylvia Warshaw, Liberal Democrat, 98
Lynda Robinson, Green, 53
Herbie Crossman, UKIP, 48

There are even now some racist idiots trying to portray this as acceptable on the basis that Stanmore Park is not ethnically British – so it becomes clear that for all its braying UKIP is a racist party!

Were the statement true it seems not to have hampered the votes of Marilyn Ashton who won and who sounds very ‘ethnically British’, only one candidate sounds to be other than caucasian.

I incline to applaud the result of Niraj Dattani without whose ancestors we would most probably have lost WWI and most deffinitely WWII and the EUscam would have gone ahead almost a century ago – how flattering that so many people from the sub continent of India have chosen to live as British citizens and how clearly many of them oppose membership of The EU.

I would hazard a guess that well over the 2-8% of the electorate amongst the Muslims, Hindus, Christians, Tamils, Jaynes, Budhists and others from India and Pakistan are actively opposed to membership of the EU!

Regards,
Greg_L-W. 

. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Mario Borghezio EFD MEP, Mark CROUCHER, Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Morten Messerschmidt, Nigel FARAGE MEP EFD Leader, Stuart AGNEW MEP NFU, Tom WISE, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

#0606* – Is UKIP TERMINALLY TAINTED by EFD Associates & PEPPs OR …….

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 28/07/2011

#0606* – Is UKIP TERMINALLY TAINTED by EFD Associates & PEPPs OR …….

 Please Be Sure To
 .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  
.
Is UKIP TERMINALLY TAINTED by EFD Associates & PEPPs OR can it be Cleaned-Up?

Cleaned-Up sufficiently to be taken seriously as a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem by the Ethical Majority in Britain!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

To Check Details use Links in text & ALSO The >Right SidebarUKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS<

Hi,

in considering UKIP, The EFD and Pan EU Political Parties one would do well to consider the quote of a dedicated long term member of UKIP in discussion of UKIP’s partner on The EFD‘s comments Mario Borghezio‘s comments when he said of the violent Norwegian Christian nutter & spree killer Anders Breivik:

“One hundred per cent of Breivik’s ideas are good, in some cases extremely good. The positions of Breivik reflect the views of those movements across Europe which are winning elections.”

It is a disgrace that UKIP are associated with such people.

He is quite right and this highlights one of the potential catastrophic outcomes of UKIP, or any genuinely patriotic party, following the money and being lumped in with the comments of vile Nationalists be they British, as with The BNP, EDL, Zionism (under a guise of Friends of Israel) or the like.

Yet more astonishing is that a party can stand for votes and clamour and expound on being patriotic and not at all like these Parties mentioned, yet join with even more odious foreign partners for self enrichment!

Interestingly UKIP loudly (currently) bans ex members of The BNP & UKFirst Party, due to their racism, and in UKFP‘s 9about whom UKIP knew astonishiongly little as proven by their idiotic belief that I would have been a member or associated with Peter Cole or its other founders for whom I had utter contempt, particularly in the light of their association with Tom Wise – (an association which was clandestine and unknown by Robin Page, Petrina Holdsworth & John West I believe! Also probably others involved such as Trevor Coleman) – UKIP’s case seemingly being for daring to stand in British elections to oppose the racism and association of UKIP with such groups as The EFD to clean-up the party and make it electable yet are banned from joining UKIP!

It is notable UKIP leadership claque wave these rules arbitrarily when it suits them, as with John Petley of UKFP who was reintroduced as an employee of Prof. Tim Congdon and conveniently UKIP overlook the fact that an ex UKIP elected NEC member is the registered owner of The UKFirst Party (by the way he is African by ethnic origin!), having driven him out of UKIP – is this clandestine racism on UKIP’s part?

So it would seem UKIP is happy to support vile racist, anti Jewish, anti homosexual advocates of murder when it suits them, especially when it pays its own corrupted leadership and its parasites!

Is UKIP now a spent force that has betrayed its electorate, its Country, its values for a grubby claque of charlatans who are enriching themselves as they feed at the EU Troughs and would seem to be a part of the problem with no serious role in the solution?

This may not be a popular question for UKIP, but clearly it is they who have provided the need for it to be very clearly answered, and that they have so desperately undermined their own credibility, not just by association with the scum of EU Politics in The EFD Group but by whom they have employed and empowered – so many low lifes like Mark Croucher, Mick McGough, Hugh Williams, Annabelle Fuller, Marta Andreasen, Malcolm Pearson, Gawain Towler, Stuart Agnew, David Bannerman, Derek Clark and the like all proven liars and cheats they clearly command nor deserve respect in any field, least of all political.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.
. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW
 

 Please Be Sure To 
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Anders BREIVIK, Mario Borghezio EFD MEP, Marta ANDREASEN MEP, NORWAY, Tom WISE MEP UKIP | Leave a Comment »

#0599* – UKIP & FARAGE LACK BASIC MORALITY or ETHICS

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 23/07/2011

#0599* – UKIP & FARAGE LACK BASIC MORALITY or ETHICS

 Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!    
.
~UKIP, FARAGE & The Leadership Claque LACK BASIC MORALITY or ETHICS!

Again and again they believe they are above the law and hold Britain and OUR Courts in contempt!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

further to my having posted the outcome of UKIP’s idiotic debacle in the Appeal Court this week – more details of which can be found at CLICK HERE – A perfectly rational question was asked of me, as posted below, to which I responded as shown:

Re: UKIP Lose Yet Again In The Courts!

Originally Posted by Streetwalker 

You post regually about the quality of personel that UKIP attracts ,of the connections with other European parties with questionable policies (EFD) . Over the years UKIP have expelled /refused membership to various undesirables . UKIP it seems are doing ,or rather trying to do exactly what you have long surgested in cleaning up its act . It would seem that ex BNP member Hardy had not changed his ultra right wing views after all .
UKIP’s one fault here is taking the advice of the legal proffesion to appeal the case . Sometimes you have to walk away , even when you are in the right.

My Reply:

Hi,

if only that was the basic truth I would agree with you – It is not.

UKIP’s inept and corrupt leadership has, as so often before, chosen to invent its rules on the hoof – do read the full judgement which can be see at CLICK HERE UKIP seem to believe, in their ineptitude and mismanagement, that they can have different rules for different people and as a result they make utter fools of themselves.

We note ex Deputy Leader and Party Chairman David Bannerman has made the written statement that Farage incurs an annual legal bill of around £140,000 AFAIR.

Fortunately David Bannerman, a liar, cheat and low life has decamped to The Tories as I predicted 7 years ago!

I totally endorse any action to clean-up UKIP, as without it they are a part of the problem and no part of the solution.

Breaking the laws of the land and being found guilty on a serial basis is no example for ANY politician to set – That is NOT cleaning up the party that is further befouling it – just as having different rules at different times for different people and liars and cheats like Mick McGough, Stuart Agnew, Marta Andreasen Derek Clark and their ilk as members of their leadership team makes them look no more than foolish – hence they have less than 30 people in elected office out of some 19,500 seats available – after 18 years!

I entirely agree that The BNP is a vile and contemptible organisation and I believe UKIP should NOT encourage racists and the anti Jewish low lifes that gather around the BNP to join without a panel clearance (3 months of ill informed membership of the BNP and a denunciation may well be a Patriot looking for a home rather than a Nationalist!). Be minded that Nigel Farage, as effectively THE PARTY, employed a BNP member as an election agent!

Do remember Nigel Farage who makes all the rules with a claque of chosen sycophants and boot lickers invited his family friend Buster Mottram to join UKIP against advice!

You may remember the outrageous comments of Nigel Farage’s puppet Malcolm Pearson that were so offensive to Muslims.

You may well have noted that UKIP endorses the killing of North African immigrants as espoused by their partners in the EFD Group.

Indeed cleaning up UKIP to try to make them electable, by informed decent people, is long over due and if they are unwilling to act with morality and ethically, show vision, display strategy, effect tactics and devise an exit and survival strategy after 18 years then PERHAPS they are working for The EU, rather than for withdrawal, as they have astonishingly NEVER had training sessions, an organisational structure or one wit of professionalism – do they assist The EU on purpose?

It has proved hugely rewarding for a small claque who feed at the troughs on the gravy train!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

 . .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW
 

 Please Be Sure To 
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Alan HARDY, Anti Jewish, Anti Muslim, Buster Mottram, David BANNERMAN MEP, EFD Group, Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Mick McGOUGH, Nigel FARAGE MEP, Stuart AGNEW MEP NFU, The BNP | Leave a Comment »

#0597* – A VERDICT TODAY? UKIP ONTO A LOSER IN COURT YET AGAIN

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/07/2011

#0597* – A VERDICT TODAY? UKIP ONTO A LOSER IN COURT YET AGAIN

 Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!    
.
~We may have A VERDICT TODAY? 
I believe yet again UKIP are ONTO A LOSER IN COURT!

They are happy to duck dive lie and defame to use members’ money to dishonestly renege on their moral duty to pay their bills with integrity!

I wonder if they would be so free with legal costs if it came out of their pockets but as was recently published by a UKIP MEP £140,000 of legal costs is not considered significant – well it wouldn’t be it is from other peoples pockets!

VERDICT ADDED

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

I gather we may well see a verdict to my posting made a week or so ago which I have posted as a repeat below to remind you.

The case came to Court yesterday so we may well have a verdict later today:

#0588* – UKIP ONTO A LOSER IN COURT YET AGAIN

#0588* – UKIP ONTO A LOSER IN COURT YET AGAIN

.
Win, Draw or Lose The Members Will Again Be The Losers!

Just as UKIP’s failure to honour the British Courts and their verdict to pay me the £12.1/2K has done nothing but show them for the dishonest, corrupt incompetents that they are!
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
Hi,

so yet again UKIP will be in Court squandering members’ money or has some gullible fool put up the £30 – £40 – £50,000 it will take to yet again learn their lesson!

Time and again UKIP finds itself in Court and rarely it seems do they win – each time costing members money and almost without fail garnering bad publicity.

Many will have heard how UKIP set out to harass me and not only did they lose their case but they have failed to honour their debt resultant which runs to something over £12.1/2K – UKIP lack even the integrity to settle that moral debt and have utterly ignored the British Courts whom they clearly hold in contempt having on various occasions sheltered behind The EUropean Courts and employment in EUrope to seek to duck their responsibilities or hide their fundamental corruption.

This time rather than honour the Court Judgement and pay compensation of £750 reinstating a member who they had accepted in full knowledge of his background and fully approved by Nigel Farage – now we see them gambling with other peoples’ money when they KNOW that their costs will far exceed the £750 the Court ordered them to pay.

UKIP whether it wins, draws or loses will be 10s of £1,000s of pounds out of pocket.

It may be worth their while reading Marta Andreasen’s call for removal of Farage as leader once again and in detail!

Subject: GENERAL NEWS
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:18:20 +0100

Hello everyone,

I’m sure most, if not all of you know, that I obtained judgment in the High Court last year against not only the local chairman of the political party of which I am a member, but also the party itself.

The defendant’s did not like that and appealed. The appeal is to be heard next week in the Court of Appeal in London. As at the original hearing, I shall be representing myself. And, as a condition of the appeal, the other side will not be able to claim costs against me even if they win – and I’ll see to it they don’t! They also have a new barrister on the job; it appears the original one left his chambers for pastures new some time after the hearing last September. I can’t understand why. Perhaps losing against a layman was more than his professional constitution could bear. But that’s his problem. Anyway it’ll be yours truly up before the ‘big beaks’ next week!

I’ve been on something of a weight loss/fitness programme these past six weeks. I’ve lost a total of 16 lbs, which I suppose is fairly good going. Over the last few weeks, however, this has plateau’d to a loss of 1 lb per week, which I came to find discouraging, especially after all the effort it takes. It reached the point where, on Saturday night just gone – I weigh myself each Saturday morning – I resolved to give it up as a bad job and go back to being a fat slob again.

The next morning I woke up and, having drunk my first coffee of the day, went off to buy a copy of the last edition of the News of the World. Now I haven’t bought a copy of that newspaper for YEARS, but as it was the last opportunity to do so I thought I’d see what it had to offer.

I had a good look through it. The glossy supplement didn’t have much of interest to men, apart from a lovely picture of the luminously beautiful Thandie Newton near the front. There was the obligatory crossword near the end and on the opposite page were the star forecasts for the week. Now my star sign is Leo, so I had a look at what the resident clairvoyant had to say. It was this (and you can check on it):

“YOU HAVE THE WILLPOWER TO START, OR RESTART, A FITNESS PLAN AND ENSURE IT WORKS”

Mystic Meg saves the day.

BYE FOR NOW

ALAN

How can such folly backing a sure financial loser be of ANY merit to Farage or UKIP or least of all its members and credibility.

Is this how UKIP sees itself acting were it ever to gain power in any context of consequence not merely Mare for a village in Cambridgeshire!

VERDICT ADDED

As Expected The Appeal Courts found against UKIP & Upheld the Guilty Verdict.

Subject: UKIP APPEAL
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:54:34 +0100

.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P{padding:0px;}.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}

Hello everyone,

Well, UKIP’s barrister – fine man that he is – argued and argued yesterday in Court 74, Court of Appeal…unsuccessfully. It’s now official: those within UKIP who are so inclined cannot do what they like; they are bound by the law like the rest of us.

Nigel Farage turned up, accompanied by a lady of, shall I say, ample bosom, who I took to be some form of assistant. He disappeared before the proceedings commenced, without having even acknowledged me. She, however, remained and I saw her and Parkin, who was also there, cosying up to one another behind me in the court room. There was also a short, very fat, grey-beared man hovering around the place, clearly as part of the opposing side’s team. Does anyone recognise the description?

Anyway, that’s it in a nutshell. Where they are planning on going from hereon is anyone’s guess. Oh, I almost forgot, when the barrister, the wheelchair-bound Mr Engelman (Trinity Chambers), was asked about the costs he quoted a figure of £16,000 in total. Somehow I find myself doubting that…

ALL GOOD WISHES

ALAN HARDY

So let us consider:

Well, UKIP’s barrister – fine man that he is – argued and argued yesterday in Court 74, Court of Appeal…unsuccessfully. It’s now official: those within UKIP who are so inclined cannot do what they like; they are bound by the law like the rest of us.

How could a qualified barrister suggest his client takes such a case when from the facts in the public domain UKIP was clearly guilty AND surely the fact that they had already been found guilty was more than something of an indication and the fact they had to lodge acceptance of the full costs of both parties even if they had by some miracle won would have made a very hollow reversal which The Courts most clearly indicated was unlikely.
 
Nigel Farage turned up, 

One has to wonder why Nigel Farage would turn up to such a minor case where any kind of victory would save UKIP £750 yet cost them very many £1,000s.
One could be forgiven for wondering if his escort and a weekend away was the motivation!

Could it possibly be that he had employed a salaried member of staff in the role or is she posiibly to be paid for her ‘services’ via her so called PR Agency and self publicist skills!

accompanied by a lady of, shall I say, ample bosom, who I took to be some form of assistant. 

He disappeared before the proceedings commenced, without having even acknowledged me. 

Hardly surprising as he must have had the intelligence to realise UKIP were unlikely to win and even if they did it would cost the membership fees of at least 1,000 members and most probably nearer 2,000 members – hardly a sound investment by a competent leader!

Little wonder that he slunk off to await the verdict beyond public view – I would speculate he was more than adequately filled in later in the day by his assistant.

She, however, remained and I saw her and Parkin, who was also there, cosying up to one another behind me in the court room. There was also a short, very fat, grey-beared man hovering around the place, clearly as part of the opposing side’s team. Does anyone recognise the description?

This could easily be a description of Mick McGough who is omni present licking any boots that may enhance his inadequacy he is ever willing to lie, cheat and dissemble in his own interest or it seems that of his owners.

However it seems more likely to have been Michael Greaves who pretends to some legal experience in the distant past – Though the last record I can find would seem to indicate he was  fired as Councel some 10 or more years ago, for abrogation of his duties and professional responsibilities.

Anyway, that’s it in a nutshell. Where they are planning on going from hereon is anyone’s guess. Oh, I almost forgot, when the barrister, the wheelchair-bound Mr Engelman (Trinity Chambers),

See his URL CLICK HERE 

was asked about the costs he quoted a figure of £16,000 in total. Somehow I find myself doubting that…

It does sound unlikely however it may well have meant his own fees.

One can only consider UKIP Leadership in their stupidity as having been ill advised to act so irresponsibly but perhaps the motivation was more influence from Nigel Farage’s point of vie by the interests of his assistant than by any measure of common sense or responsible adult behaviour!
. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
~UN-PROFESSIONAL RESPONSES DEMEAN UKIP!
Alan Hardy’s comments serve him ill but he is merely a member!
It does seem when Steve Crowther, Steve Allison or any of the other buffoons speaks out they damage the party credibility!!
.
Hi,

one has to wonder whose ‘e’Mails are the more damaging to the cause they ‘claim’ to espouse.

I would submit that Steve Allisons are the more consequential as they are so clearly anti UKIP’s best interests.

So let us see what they have to say for themselves:

Firstly I would contend that Alan Hardy’s comments were far from wise when he stated:

Subject: UKIP’S APPEAL
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:23:22 +0100
From: alan hardy
To: Gordon Parkin , Jonathan Arnott , lisa duffy , , Malcolm Goyns , Nigel Farage , Stephen Allison
Dear Sirs,

Courtesy of the Court of Appeal: those within UKIP who feel so inclined CANNOT do as they please, they are bound by the law as are the rest of society. And I may add that UKIP faces further legal action unless the decision not to allow former members of the BNP to stand as candidates for the party, as well as for internal posts, is reversed. Indeed I would like to see written evidence that it even exists.

Take note all of you, especially Mr. Farage.

ALAN HARDY
successful litigant.

Clearly one can empathise with Alan Hardy and just as Nigel Farage must have realised he had exposed UKIP to a hiding for nothing and a bill in the region of £30-50K. That  Farage left hurriedly from The Appeal Courts in The Strand it ill becomes Alan Hardy to crow over so obvious a victory.

Perhaps Farage would have served the party better had he read the original judgement which I have posted in full – see The Right Sidebar & click on Alan Hardy etc.

You will note the judgement draws attention to the fact that The BNP issue was clearly no more than a fig leaf etc.

To seek to uphold the fundamentals of basic law is now branded by some of UKIP’s enemies  as being ‘anti UKIP’.

Surely no one would deny UKIP the right to enact into their Constitution, Rules or Manifesto the resolution to prevent past members of The BNP from joining UKIP, on some grounds or other but clearly not on the grounds of Racism, anti Judaism, anti homosexuality or opposition to immigrants as UKIP’s parners in The EU The EFD are not only pro EU membership but have advocated killing Immigrants from North Africa, are avowedly Racist espousing segregation on public transport etc., anti Homosexual advocating dressing them as rabbits and shooting them and include Holocaust Deniers.

That UKIP welcomes membership of such a group yet seeks to ban ex members of The BNP from joining makes their claimed ruling look a little foolish and more a petty rivalry than a point of principle sadly.

That UKIP has a track record of involvement with The BNP members and before them The National Front is indisputable. It is also worth reminding people of UKIP’s own extremist past with the vetting of members by the criminal Gerry Gable via the equally dishonest Mark Croucher and false accusations of membership and association with The BNP.

That Alan Hardy sent his ‘e’Mail makes it look as if he is fronting efforts at bringing in BNP members which I doubt he would be so foolish as to espouse but we may well find his ‘e’Mail is little more than a venting of his anger at the dishonesty of UKIP as he has, I am given to understand, written confirmation from Nigel Farage that he had informed UKIP of his past membership of The BNP and Farage accepted him as a UKIP member specifically.

I still contend Alan Hardy’s ‘e’Mail was unwise whether he wishes to drift out of UKIP seeing them as a spent force or continue his active membership. He has also undermined his own credibility should he be serious in his bluster about further legal action.

I would contend Alan Hardy has harmed his own position but done little harm to UKIP save in costs, which are a mere bagatelle relative to the £Millions Farage has personally made from his position in UKIP.

Let us see if you think Steve Allison’s comments are any more professional or are they effectively anti UKIP in the manner that they damage the party and its credibility since he speaks as an executive of the party, unlike Alan Hardy who is merely an ex member of The BNP who is in dispute with UKIP over his membership status!

Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011
From: steve.allison107@btinternet.com
To: steve.allison107@btinternet.com
Subject:

You may have heard that UKIP lost its appeal in court today against the re-admittance to membership of a Mr.Alan Hardy. This is being spun by certain anti-UKIP Blogs and Websites as a defeat for UKIP and touted an example of how Nigel has been wasting UKIP’s money on personal legal vendettas.

I do not think anyone who knows me would accuse me of being a Nigel Sycophant or someone who believes Nigel can do no wrong, However, in this case I am definitely 100% behind Nigel. Alan Hardy is a former member of the BNP and his case is AT THE MOMENT limited to him. However, I believe that he is being used as a Trojan Horse to force UKIP to accept BNP Members into out ranks and worse. I copy below an e-mail that Hardy sent after the Appeal Court Ruling.

UKIP has to fight this man to the bitter end! We have all worked too hard to destroy the myth that UKIP and the BNP are in any way alike, we must keep out the BNP, this is a fight we cannot afford to lose.

Steve Allison

Let us consider this in some detail:

You may have heard that UKIP lost its appeal in court today against the re-admittance to membership of a Mr.Alan Hardy.

The Court’s ruled that Alan Hardy could not be barred from the party on the grounds given in the light of the facts – may I suggest that those who have UKIP’s long term wellbeing at heart and genuinely support UKIP take the trouble to read the judgement and it becomes clear why The Courts not only found in favour of Alan Hardy but that the original judgement was upheld by The Appeal Courts in The Strand.

This is being spun by certain anti-UKIP Blogs and Websites as a defeat for UKIP and touted an example of how Nigel has been wasting UKIP’s money on personal legal vendettas.

How else could any honest individual see this? I can not speak for anti UKIP blogs as i rarely read them  and then only by accident – sadly the blogs UKIP controls do more than enough damage to UKIP!

Clearly no one is likely to take UKIP seriously as a part of the law making process when it is so clearly in abuse of the law itself and something of a vexatious litigant!

Those who actively seek to support UKIP seek to clean-up the party not provide costly cover for its dishonest executive!

I do not think anyone who knows me would accuse me of being a Nigel Sycophant or someone who believes Nigel can do no wrong,

Perhaps you could show where Steve Allison has intentionally spoken out to clean-up UKIP and make it electable other than in his personal interest!

However, in this case I am definitely 100% behind Nigel.

Steve Allison pretends to balance yet promptly defends Nigel Farage’s ineptitude thereby showing a clear lack of judgement on his own part.

Alan Hardy is a former member of the BNP and his case is AT THE MOMENT limited to him.

Indeed it is and also to the irrefutable fact that UKIP leadership was aware of his past BNP affiliations and actively promoted or at least condoned his membership granting him not only membership of UKIP but as I recall a branch membership status!

However, I believe that he is being used as a Trojan Horse to force UKIP to accept BNP Members into out ranks and worse.

Were that the case do not forget it was Nigel Farage who threw open the gates of Troy and on precedent alone made the entry of The Trojan Horse possible to mix our poets it may be apposite to some to see the engineer hoist on his own petard but I as a supporter of UKIP over many years would like Laocoön caution as so aptly did Virgil with his notable line “Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes”

I copy below an e-mail that Hardy sent after the Appeal Court Ruling.

As per the mailing I received previously and have posted above.

UKIP has to fight this man to the bitter end!

A wise General selects his ground and also his time for battle where an inept fool charges in and looses as have UKIP – Indeed the end will be bitter. You may yet find that in making much of this issue UKIP may yet throw open the gates and stand bereft of clothing for a battle – however aware of the ineptitude of Alan Hardy’s message were it I seeking the well being of UKIP I would act with good grace and grant his membership as the Courts have legally shown in HIS CASE there were no legal grounds used in his removal.

Thereby no precedent will be set and the Trojan Horse can stand at the side of the road to the castle until it is shown to be of no use in smuggling the troops of the claimed enemy into the camp.

We have all worked too hard to destroy the myth that UKIP and the BNP are in any way alike, we must keep out the BNP, this is a fight we cannot afford to lose.

This of course is no more than self serving spin and clearly twaddle when you consider UKIP’s fellowship with ex NF members and the use it has made of ex BNP members – that it is clearly twaddle is shown by UKIP’s associates in The EU – merely BNP with funny accents!!

Steve Allison

Were it I seeking to serve UKIP I would not be wasting members’ money nor undermining UKIP’s credibility but as a long term supporter I would be considering the long term and to that end I would call an immediate NEC meeting. I would enact a rule empowering a sub committee of people seen as honest and of probity from within UKIP which would by deffinition preclude members of The NEC and leadership claque and I would empower them to review every member, starting from the top and reserve the right to refund the membership of any member who fulfilled certaimn criteria in terms of past memberships and Criminal Records.

One would have to take care as to how this was worded as it could well preclude individuals like Derek clark, Nigel Farage, Jeffrey Titford, Graham Booth and the like from membership as they have all fallen foul of the law I understand and have had to repay monies they fraudulently obtained or dishonestly used. I understand we are yet to hear the outcome of the case against Stuart Agnew and that against David Bannerman though I gather Mike Nattrass has withdrawn his claim against The Sunday Times and they are to publish an update that subsequent to their earlier article OLAF have decided to take no further action against Mike Nattrass.

In the matter of cleaning up UKIP the party would be well served were it to put before the committee as constituted such individuals as Annabelle Fuller, Mick McGough, Douglas Denny, Andrew Smith, Hugh Williams and others who through their fantasies and dishonesty have corrupted UKIP and demeaned its reputation as a credible political force.

I wonder what the anti UKIP bloggers that Steve Allison seems to follow will make of dealing with the truth and on what leg they would seek to stand if UKIP were cleaned-up and presented a credible professional stance with vision, strategy, tactics a plan – training and a structure that would make them presentable to the informed electorate and encourage activists to rejoin with probity and transparency.

Until that time UKIP defames itself daily on its own controlled blogs such that one wonders what an anti UKIP blog would find to write about – though Steve Alison has made a pretty fair fist of showing us by example.

As a supporter I am all too well aware that unless UKIP makes these moves towards professionalising they are increasingly a part of the problem when it comes to leaving The EU and have no place in the solution.

For more details regarding this particular case do CLICK HERE
. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com  
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW
 

 Please Be Sure To 
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Nigel FARAGE MEP, UKIP, UKIP Profligacy | Leave a Comment »

#0588* – UKIP ONTO A LOSER IN COURT YET AGAIN

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 13/07/2011

#0588* – UKIP ONTO A LOSER IN COURT YET AGAIN

 Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!    
.
UKIP ONTO A LOSER IN COURT YET AGAIN!

Win, Draw or Lose The Members Will Again Be The Losers!

Just as UKIP’s failure to honour the British Courts and their verdict to pay me the £12.1/2K has done nothing but show them for the dishonest, corrupt incompetents that they are!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

so yet again UKIP will be in Court squandering members’ money or has some gullible fool put up the £30 – £40 – £50,000 it will take to yet again learn their lesson!

Time and again UKIP finds itself in Court and rarely it seems do they win – each time costing members money and almost without fail garnering bad publicity.

Many will have heard how UKIP set out to harass me and not only did they lose their case but they have failed to honour their debt resultant which runs to something over £12.1/2K – UKIP lack even the integrity to settle that moral debt and have utterly ignored the British Courts whom they clearly hold in contempt having on various occasions sheltered behind The EUropean Courts and employment in EUrope to seek to duck their responsibilities or hide their fundamental corruption.

This time rather than honour the Court Judgement and pay compensation of £750 reinstating a member who they had accepted in full knowledge of his background and fully approved by Nigel Farage – now we see them gambling with other peoples’ money when they KNOW that their costs will far exceed the £750 the Court ordered them to pay.

UKIP whether it wins, draws or loses will be 10s of £1,000s of pounds out of pocket.

It may be worth their while reading Marta Andreasen’s call for removal of Farage as leader once again and in detail!

Subject: GENERAL NEWS
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:18:20 +0100

.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P{padding:0px;}.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}

Hello everyone,
 
I’m sure most, if not all of you know, that I obtained judgment in the High Court last year against not only the local chairman of the political party of which I am a member, but also the party itself.
 
The defendant’s did not like that and appealed. The appeal is to be heard next week in the Court of Appeal in London. As at the original hearing, I shall be representing myself. And, as a condition of the appeal, the other side will not be able to claim costs against me even if they win – and I’ll see to it they don’t! They also have a new barrister on the job; it appears the original one left his chambers for pastures new some time after the hearing last September. I can’t understand why. Perhaps losing against a layman was more than his professional constitution could bear. But that’s his problem. Anyway it’ll be yours truly up before the ‘big beaks’ next week!
 
I’ve been on something of a weight loss/fitness programme these past six weeks. I’ve lost a total of 16 lbs, which I suppose is fairly good going. Over the last few weeks, however, this has plateau’d to a loss of 1 lb per week, which I came to find discouraging, especially after all the effort it takes. It reached the point where, on Saturday night just gone – I weigh myself each Saturday morning – I resolved to give it up as a bad job and go back to being a fat slob again.
 
The next morning I woke up and, having drunk my first coffee of the day, went off to buy a copy of the last edition of the News of the World. Now I haven’t bought a copy of that newspaper for YEARS, but as it was the last opportunity to do so I thought I’d see what it had to offer.
 
I had a good look through it. The glossy supplement didn’t have much of interest to men, apart from a lovely picture of the luminously beautiful Thandie Newton near the front. There was the obligatory crossword near the end and on the opposite page were the star forecasts for the week. Now my star sign is Leo, so I had a look at what the resident clairvoyant had to say. It was this (and you can check on it):
 
“YOU HAVE THE WILLPOWER TO START, OR RESTART, A FITNESS PLAN AND ENSURE IT WORKS”
 
Mystic Meg saves the day.
 
BYE FOR NOW
 
ALAN

How can such folly backing a sure financial loser be of ANY merit to Farage or UKIP or least of all its members and credibility.

Is this how UKIP sees itself acting were it ever to gain power in any context of consequence not merely Mare for a village in Cambridgeshire!
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Apeal Courts, COURT Again, Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Nigel FARAGE MEP, UKIP, UKIP Contempt for British Justice, UKIP Default, UKIP Guilty Verdict | Leave a Comment »

#0545* – UKIP MEPs COULD FIND THEMSELVES EXPOSED

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 12/06/2011

#0545* – UKIP MEPs COULD FIND THEMSELVES EXPOSED

 Please Be Sure To
My Blogs  To Spread The Facts
World Wide
To Leave-The-EU  

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
 A DISPROPORTIONATE NUMBER of UKIP MEPs COULD FIND THEMSELVES EXPOSED!

Clearly the cases against Tom Wise & Lindsey Jenkins are resolved!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Hi,

this verdict could well prove very embarrassing for a number of UKIP MEPs who we know have been under investigation and on whom we have actually supplied the Official OLAF and sometimes Police investigation numbers.

Verdicts have been reached on Mike Nattrass we are assured and also on Graham Booth.

There have also been verdicts and decisions reached on Nigel Farage & Jeffrey Titford.

It is understood that a verdict has been reached by OLAF on Derek Clark but it is unknown if The British Police will actually prosecute.

Stuart Agnew has admitted to fraud and has given details of how he and David Bannerman have defrauded the tax payers and are we understand subject of protracted investigation by OLAF pending outcome/verdict.

Marta Andreasen has yet again lost a Court Ruling over her whistle blowing fantasies.

A verdict was reached by The Courts finding UKIP, Nigel Farage & Godfrey Bloom guilty of abuse, dishonesty and harassment of of Nikki Sinclaire MEP who has acquiesced to withdraw her case for the sake of the members in return for a published apology CLICK HERE

UKIP lost a case seeking to harass and silence me from publishing the truth and are in derelection of Judgement with a debt to me – as yet unpaid of £12.1/2K if one listened to Marta Andreasen their bankruptcy may preclude them from acting honourably and settling their debt.

This new Court Ruling as reported below may well leave the low lifes in UKIP with no fancy stories for their criminality. There will of course be those who were honourably acquitted of their crimes but one wonders why they do not publish their judgements to clear their names and The Party’s tattered reputation.

A reputation that even with an alleged spend of £170K in legal bills annually proping up their egos and miscreant behaviour is unsurprisingly going down the drain.
.

Court rules on MEPs’ fiddles

A landmark ruling in the European Court of Justice could force MEPs to disclose evidence of misconduct and financial abuse

Bojan Pancevski Published: 12 June 2011
The European parliament may have to disclose a number of internal audits (Frederick Florin)  

The European parliament could be forced to disclose wide-ranging evidence of financial abuse and misconduct by MEPs after a landmark court ruling last week.
On Tuesday the European Court of Justice ruled that the parliament must release a 2008 report which documented the way MEPs can manipulate allowances to pocket more than £1m from a single five-year term, in addition to their salaries.
The Sunday Times website is today publishing the full report, which the parliament has tried to suppress. Even now it plans to appeal against the court ruling, which follows a three-year battle by Ciaran Toland, an Irish campaigner.
In 2009 this newspaper published part of the report drawn up by Robert Galvin, the parliament’s chief internal auditor.
Abuses include MEPs claiming up to £180,000 in annual staff allowances without having to keep any proof; awarding themselves bonuses of up to 1½ times salary and diverting public money into front companies. The ruling could also result in the parliament having to disclose information including:
– Names of MEPs forced to repay money or found to have committed wrongdoing.
– Internal audits showing abuse of funds by MEPs or senior eurocrats.
– Details of purchases including cars and furniture and information about contracts, some of which have reportedly been awarded without a tendering procedure.

It is understood that more than 10 MEPs are being investigated for possible abuse of funds and could be forced to return money.

To view the original article CLICK HERE
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
 Please Be Sure To
My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide To Leave-The-EU  

Posted in David BANNERMAN MEP, Derek Clark MEP, Graham Booth MEP, Lindsey Jenkins, Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Mike Nattrass MEP, Nigel FARAGE MEP, Stuart AGNEW MEP, Tom WISE MEP | Leave a Comment »

#0542* – UKIP IS WELL SHOT OF David BANNERMAN – More To Go!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 10/06/2011

#0542* – UKIP IS WELL SHOT OF David BANNERMAN – More To Go!

 Please Be Sure To
My Blogs  
To Spread The Facts 
World Wide 

To Leave-The-EU  
 

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
UKIP IS WELL SHOT OF David BANNERMAN – 
LET US HOPE

The Tories Still Have The Lid Off of Their Waste Bin

More To Go From UKIP YET – To Make It Fit For Purpose!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Hi,

do bear in mind it was I who spoke out loud, around when the picture of David Bannerman in this article – just over 7 Years ago when he not only betrayed The Tories but lied through his teath having failed in the big pond, to engratiate himself with the minnows in what was The UKIP Puddle some 7 years ago.

David The Desk – Pigeon Holed over 7 years ago
As A Liar, Cheat & Self Serving Low Life
TIME HAS PROVED ME RIGHT

David Bannerman lied about his track record in The Tories where he was virtually unknown and apart from being a bag carrier had never had much of a job.

Then he lied about his parentage.

He then lied about his ancestry.

He then lied about his achievements in a CV that contained almost as much Hockum and Self Serving Spin as the duplicitous and dishonest Marta Andreasen.

UKIP were then IDIOTS to take him on Just as The Tories are IDIOTS to take him back – a self serving dishonest and utterly oleaginous creep with some particularly unattractive personal peccadilloes.

Only Nigel Farage was gullible enough to make him his protege in UKIP – as he did with the fraud Marta Andreasen, The Tory Plant Stephen Sobey, The Idiotic Lord Pearson, The risible Christopher Monkton, The debauched drunkard Godfrey Bloom, The weak kneed Godfrey Bloom, Stuart Crisis of Confidence Wheeler, The ridiculous Paul Nuttall, The brown noses and liars Mick McGough, Gawain Towler, Michael Heavers, Ray Finch, Jon Ison, Annabelle Fuller, Peter Reeve, Mark Croucher, Malcolm Wood, Hugh Wil;liams, Stuart NFU Stuff The Party Agnew, Wee Willy Tantrum from Dartmouth, Need we go on?

Whilst bringing all these clowns, wastrels and self serving parasites on board to the detriment of the party so that he could build a dung heap on which to stand in no fear of being outshone consider who he drove out in disgust: CLICK HERE So that his mediocrity would never be outshone nor his inability and ineptitude as a leader would not be challenged!

David Bannerman should fit in well with The Cleggerons – a cheat, a liar, a turncoat and a self serving rascal.

UKIP defector David Campbell-Bannerman rocks the boat

Politics can be nasty business. Just ask David Campbell-Bannerman.
David Campbell-Bannerman
The Eastern MEP’s defection from UKIP to the Conservatives has angered his former colleagues.
“Nobody really knew who he was, there would have been a bigger reaction if one of our local councillors had defected to the Conservatives,” says Lisa Duffy, the UKIP Mayor of Ramsey in Cambridgeshire. She says she used to call Mr Campbell-Bannerman a close personal friend.
“I was with him at a party just the other week and he gave no indication he was going to do this. How can he say we’re just a pressure group? What’s he been doing for the last five years?”
UKIP’s leader Nigel Farage is also just as blunt about his former deputy, telling us: “I think he’s been a disappointment to our members in the East. This defection is purely about his career. We’ll just shrug our shoulders, ignore him and move on.”
If he didn’t have enough to cope with, Mr Campbell-Bannerman’s office in Cambridge has got a burst pipe and he’s had to base himself in Health Secretary Andrew Lansley‘s boardroom.
“You’ve got to be brave to do this” he says “and you do get a lot of abuse and vitriol but I haven’t changed by views. I am still 100% behind withdrawal from the EU” he said.
He hasn’t wasted time espousing his views within the Conservative party either.
In an article for the influential Conservative Home he said the Tories should be changing their policy on Europe either by allowing an in/out referendum or ideally by advocating withdrawal.
“The situation is changing,” he says. “The Euro is in trouble and may well collapse, more countries need bailing out, a growing number of people are questioning why we are still in the EU.
“I want to argue from within (for withdrawal). No one has painted a picture of a positive alternative of an independent Britain outside the EU trading in a friendly way.”
So within a fortnight of joining the Tories he’s already rocking the boat.
The Conservatives will tolerate Mr Campbell-Bannerman’s views – many other MEPs and MPs share them – but they are in the minority and there are no plans yet to change party policy.

SORRY ABOUT THE OLD PHOTO BUT IT CAME WITH
THE LOAD OF OLD BALONEY IN THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE CLICK HERE
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
 Please Be Sure To
My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide To Leave-The-EU  

Posted in Christopher MONCKTON, David BANNERMAN MEP, Gerard BATTEN MEP, Godfrey BLOOM MEP, Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Nigel FARAGE MEP, Stuart WHEELER | Leave a Comment »

#0528* – UKIP & FARAGE Share A Mary Hopkins Moment!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 05/06/2011

#0528* – UKIP & FARAGE Share A Mary Hopkins Moment!
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
UKIP & FARAGE Share A Mary Hopkins Moment!
To Help Understand CLICK HERE!
However it seems UKIP Is Learning Life Is What gets In The Way of Your Plans!

Even the sad inadequates who form the claque of sycophants are clearly bewildered as they trot out their juvenile hero worship – oblivious of just how stupid they show themselves to be!

The older ones see their scams and jollies threatened by their own corrupt inadequacy!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

UKIP has been extraordinarily fortunate to date as they are considered of such little relevance that the media have, like the public, largely ignored their childish squabbling to keep their snouts in or near the troughs on the gravy train.

As Steve Allison so clearly put it there is no clear provenance that UKIP MEPs taking up their seats in the farcical EU Parliament has been of any benefit to EUroScepticism and withdrawal from The EU.
Accurate QUOTE CLICK HERE

I trust this picture will help – The theory that it was ‘Set Up’ was one of several put forward by Nigel Farage over a period of time as each previous one was shot down in flames:

There were even claims made that the meeting had never taken place which somewhat unravelled when it was scientifically proven that the picture was NOT a photo montage.

Interestingly the many stories put forward by the Farage spin machine were so palpably dishonest that they destroyed any hope of rebuttal and an article in The Times Newspaper stood uncorrected as factually corrected.

To quote a senior elected party member:

“I don’t question HIS recollection of the incident or HIS interpretation of the story. I’m sure he is sincere in his beliefs. Similarly I don’t question anyone’s belief in an almighty God. I’m sure they are sincere in their beliefs. I don’t share those beliefs but it doesn’t  make me right and them wrong or visa versa. However, I know that you and I will never agree on this because there is no god but Farage and Heaver is his prophet so there is no point discussing it further really is there?”

And to think this was said long after intelligent people had realised what a nasty little creep Michael Heavers is – currently he is clearly Nigel Farage’s butt boy a funded cheer leader and praise singer without ethics, principles, vision or integrity, replacing the serial liar and utterly corrupt failed publican, press officer and much else – Mark Croucher.

Nigel Farage’s personal links with The BNP were irrefutable and his links with The National Front are ongoing though as The NF fades there is less notable a link.

That Farage’s father Guy had NF links as a Subaltern in the army before he left and that the close family friend Buster Motram, who was introduced by Farage to the party against wiser counsel. That Farage had racist and anti Jewish links is irrefutable – you will also note he spoke on numerous occasions at The Swinton Circle, seen by many a more balanced individual as racist and most clearly an organisation which harboured known fraud and corruption giving a frequent platform to the known criminal Tom Wise.

Do not be beguilled by the politically idiotic and malicious with stories of National Democrat membership being of overly much concern as it was a nascent organisation that was made up of those largely moving away from the hard core racism of The National Front or its splinter group The BNP. The ND had little time to formulate policy before it sallied forth into an election, largely making up policy as it went along.

The National Democrats didn’t last long and withered bringing down The National Front as it slid from obscurity to oblivion, some members drifting off to The BNP and others to meet up with chums from NF days in UKIP whilst the raw recruits in the main seem to have been welcomed by UKIP.

Farage’s election agent for a considerable time was National front.

The renunciation of The BNP of today is a desperate move to create a distance for publicity purposes from the racist, anti Jewish anti homosexual and violent agenda thinly disguised in The BNP whilst openly supported by UKIP within The EU – despite any protestations to the contrary.

Look closely at UKIP’s Pan EU Political EFD Grouping and you will realise just how corrupt and dishonest is their position renouncing The BNP on the one hand whilst all too willing to support their EFD equivallent in their violent anti homosexuality, holocaust denial, anti Judaism and racist comments and behaviour.

That members of UKFirstParty are banned is a pure act of petty spite as a result of shame at having lied cheated and rigged internal selection procedure and having been called to account by some who had spoken out against such corruption.

That UKFirstParty was set up as a UKIP spoiler party was a myth promoted to cover the shame of losing such a large chunk of relatively influential senior members as a result of the outright dishonesty of UKIP leadership and the parasites who feed from their largesse.

UKIP politician defects to Tories because he wants to join a ‘serious party’

A former deputy leader of UKIP today announced his defection to the Conservatives in a bitter blow for the anti-EU party and its leader Nigel Farage. 
David Campbell-Bannerman, the UKIP MEP for the East of England, said that he was switching to join the Tories because he wanted to represent a serious party and not a pressure group. 
Mr Campbell-Bannerman, 50, had been responsible for drawing up much of UKIP’s wider policy agenda including defence and foreign policy and his defection comes at a time of simmering discontent with Mr Farage’s leadership. 
Earlier this month, Marta Andreasen, UKIP MEP for South East England, called for Mr Farage to step down after disappointing results for the party in the local elections. 

“Party members and supporters are justifiably angry. After promises of success and claims that the party would triple the number of its seats, after large amounts of party members and donors money was spent on what was a poorly led campaign, the result was frankly dismal,” she said.

To view this article CLICK HERE

Meek Lib Dems pale next to squabbling UKIP

Here’s thrilling news for Nick Clegg. At last there’s a party leader who is having a more torrid time: Nigel Farage of the UK Independence party. First, the MEP David Campbell Bannerman, a former deputy leader, defected to the Conservatives. Now another MEP seems to be threatening legal action. 

When Marta Andreasen, once hailed as UKIP’s Sarah Palin, recently called on Farage to resign after the party’s dismal haul in local elections, he dismissed her as “hopelessly out of touch” and added “she hasn’t been in the UK for several months”. 

Andreasen now wants him to retract that remark, warning darkly of “other avenues of redress”. She says: “His comments create the impression that I am somehow an absentee MEP. Nothing could be further from the truth.” 

UKIP and Farage, who was only re-elected leader last November, are beginning to resemble a squabbling couple: can’t live with him, can’t live without him.

To view the original CLICK HERE

Also an interesting truth catches up with Nigel Farage from 2004 see: CLICK HERE
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62

Posted in Anti Jewish, BNP, David BANNERMAN MEP, Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Nigel FARAGE MEP, racist, Racist EFD, Tom WISE UKIP MEP, UKIP anti homosexuality | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: