May 2023
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31

Archive for the ‘Money laundering’ Category

#0696* – For Those Interested In UKIP & Related Corruption & Ethics!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 17/11/2011

#0696* – For Those Interested In UKIP & Related Corruption & Ethics!
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

For Those Interested In UKIP & Related Corruption & Ethics!

This just a recent glimpse!

Try the right sidebar & many links!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
Hi,

I contend that UKIP Leadership its parasites and sycophants are self serving, corrupt, inept, unprincipled, unethical and unfit for purpose.

Sadly the evidence is all too readily available and the facts speak for themselves – just look at the array of low lifes squabbling and defaming like fools in bedlam!

You may want to keep up to date with the ethical resignation of Steve Allison from UKIP elected Office and his appointment to Party Office due to his split loyalty one wonders if Peter Reeve will act ethically or hide behind the spin that has been put out that implies work he has been doing for David Bannerman was before he returned to The Tories!

Were this the case one is forced to ask what motivated Gollom to mount such an attack and have such a dispute when he has for many years tried to ride to horses for two masters and acted in an unprincipled manner and for money also.

There is also much to be learned at CLICK HERE

The many other links will prove informative:

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS

A measure of the ineptitude of UKIP leadership and its parasites is thet in 20 years they have abjectly failed to make so much as a dent on UK politics with less than 20 elected members holding places in the 19,500 or so domestic governance structure!

Their abject failure to build an organisational structure – provide a vision, have ANY strategy or tactics – put forward absolutely no defence to the EU Constitution which was enacted and imposed as The Lisbon Treaty.

Nor have UKIP provided so much as an exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms.

Richard North makes his latest comments (a part of everyone’s recovery from major heart surgery one must presume!) that even show they have far less understanding of The EU structure than one would expect but then again who of any consequence or gravitas is part of their self serving and self enriching claque!

Struggling for coherence – by Richard… Thursday, November 17, 2011

Maybe it is just post-operative blues, but I’m struggling to get back into the frame, with the news agenda lacking any apparent coherence. We are seeing much the same EU stories as before, nothing has been resolved and the UK political position is no further forward.

I am grateful, therefore, to Witterings from Witney, for picking up a comment of mine on the Norwegian situation, brought up by Cameron in his Lord Mayor’s Banquet speech, and supposedly rebutted by Farage.

This affords me an opportunity to display some irritation (hey! I’m entitled occasionally) at the limitations of our “own” side. For, while one expects nothing of Cameron – or any of the other Tories who seem impervious to knowledge on the EU – one would hope that our own would take the time to find out something of the organisation of which they speak.

In the case of Norway, this is quite important, as the situation is deemed to be a weak point in the eurosceptic armoury. Even outside the EU, it is held, Britain would have to adopt common trading law, as does Norway but, unlike currently, we would lose any influence in its framing, having thus to adopt in the manner of Norway, laws sent to us by fax from Brussels – the so-called “fax law” option.

Bizarrely, Farage concedes this point, although it is not true and can easily be demolished. We have rehearsed it many times and wrote a definitive piece in May 2008, pointing out the actual situation. Most of these laws are not agreed by the EU at all, but by intergovernmental bodies such as UNECE, of which Norway (and the UK) is a member. The legislation is then processed by the EU commission acting in more of a bureaucratic than legislative role.

In other pieces, such as this, I have pointed out that there are dozens of UNECE-type bodies, which would also continue in place even if we left the EU, and through which we would continue to agree international standards, to which EU members would also be bound. Outside the EU, therefore, we would have just as much influence over single market-type law, adopted by EU members.

The down-side, of course, is that leaving the EU would actually provide less relief from petty regulation than we might imagine, although we could disapply much of it from the domestic market.

This though, is core knowledge which should be shaping the debate. But, tediously, one of the leading players continues to do nothing other than display his ignorance, having never troubled to expand his knowledge-set beyond the basic minimum.

And this is why UKIP risks being left at the starting gate, should we come to a real debate about the mechanics of leaving the EU. The Party has no more to offer than the Tories, and that is perilously little.

One sees, for instance, the halt and the lame in that direction, talking blithely about which powers to repatriate and how they would go about reclaiming them, demonstrating absolutely no practical understanding of the complexities involved.

Strangely, of all the policies at present managed by the EU, the first we should claw back is the research programme. This is quite simply because, to repatriate powers, we must replace policies – otherwise there is no point in so doing. And those that are aware of the processes will be aware that a huge amount of policy development (a complex, expensive and time-consuming process) is funded under the research programme.

Thus, is order to reclaim powers, we must develop new policies and, to do that, we must reclaim the policy-making tools.

And so do we need coherence in the debate. Leaving the EU is eminently practicable, possible and necessary, but only if we are able to offer a credible and realistic pathway. To its shame, the eurosceptic community has yet to deliver on this and, when we hear the likes of Farage parade his ignorance, we wonder how longer we are going to have to wait.

. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar
< Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU

Posted in Money laundering, Richard NORTH Dr, UKIP Corruption | Leave a Comment »

#0372* – UKIP – Den DOVER – Similarities & a WHISTLE CONCERT!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 23/03/2011

#0372* – UKIP – Den DOVER – Similarities & a WHISTLE CONCERT!
.

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.

UKIP Corruption – Tory Den DOVER ex MEP – Similarities & a WHISTLE BLOWING CONCERT!!!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Former MEP faces ‘judgement day’ in ECJ hearing

By Martin Banks – 22nd March 2011

On Thursday we find out whether the court agrees that the financial abuse was flagrant

Chris Davies

Former UK MEP Den Dover will go to court later this week to contest a decision that he should repay part of his parliamentary expenses.

The European Court of Justice in Luxembourg is expected to give its ruling on the case on Thursday.

Parliament says that between 1999 and 2008 it paid a total of just over €1m to a company called MP Holdings Ltd which listed as its directors Den Dover’s wife and daughter.

The money came from the allowance intended to pay the salaries and costs of a MEPs‘ staff and Dover’s company was supposed to administer it independently.

Questions about the arrangements started to be asked in 2006 but it was not until 2008 that parliament’s secretary general suggested that there was a conflict of interest and asked for details of the actual expenditure.

In October, the secretary general ruled that for the period August 1999 to June 2008 only €482,000 could be justified as having been paid in salaries, national insurance and legitimate staff travel expenses.

On Tuesday, a parliament spokesman told this website, “We will wait for the decision of the court. If the court supports parliament’s position, then parliament will continue steps to recover the funds from the former MEP.

“However, parliament has no powers to prosecute anyone.”

UK Liberal Democrat MEP Chris Davies has campaigned for more transparency in MEPs’ pay and allowances and has taken a particular interest in the Dover case.

Davies said, “I hope that most people elected to parliament know the difference between right and wrong, honourable and dishonourable behaviour, without having to have it laid down by law. But the fact is that some do not – as recent ‘cash for amendments’ – revelations suggest.“

He said the scale of abuse that “seems to have become common practice” amongst some MEPs was revealed in a secret report by parliament’s internal auditor in June 2008.

Davies said, “I was one of the few MEPs who had the chance, as a member of the budgetary control committee, to read the report in a sealed room.

“The report led to changes which have very significantly curbed the abuse of the secretarial allowance payments, but disgracefully, parliament is still requesting that the Court of Justice keeps the auditor’s report secret. This is ridiculous given that it can be found on the internet.

“So Den Dover might well feel very hard done by to have been fingered and chased by parliament when so many others seem to have got away with it.

“Indeed, I think he could have got away with it himself if he hadn’t tried to be clever and make payments through an ‘independent’ company.

“My interpretation of the rules that applied at the time is that he could have legitimately paid the entire allowance to his wife in her capacity as his secretary. She could have been the best paid secretary in the world but the payments wouldn’t have been challenged.”

He went on, “On Thursday we find out whether the court agrees that the financial abuse was flagrant and the money must be repaid.

“Alternatively, the court could just agree that the parliamentary rules were so lax for years that it would not be fair to demand retrospective repayments now.”

The case before the ECJ is administrative not criminal, but if Den Dover is required to repay the money does it end there?

“In Britain, MPs have gone to jail for wrongly claiming €22,000. What length of imprisonment would be justified by false claims for €573,000?”

Original article CLICK HERE

Or another take on the issue:

Tomorrow is judgement day for former UK Conservative MEP Den Dover (North West region). The European Parliament is demanding that he repay £538,290 that it alleges was wrongly claimed by him between 1999 and 2008. He is contesting the decision and the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg is about to give its ruling.

The Parliament says that over this period it paid a total of £959,446 to a company called MP Holdings Ltd which had as directors Dover’s wife and daughter. The money came from the allowance intended to pay the salaries and costs of an MEPs’ staff, and the company was supposed to administer it independently and at arm’s length from the MEP, although it seems that Dover’s staff included his wife and daughter (part-time)

Questions about the arrangements started to be asked in 2006 but it was not until 2008 that the Parliament’s Secretary-General suggested that there was a conflict of interest and asked for details of the actual expenditure. In October the Secretary-General ruled that for the period August 1999 to June 2008 only £421,156 could be justified as having been paid in salaries, national insurance and legitimate staff travel expenses.

So what does the Parliament consider was illegitimate expenditure?

£101,068 for three cars

£15,404 for office supplies and equipment, £89,235 for postage and stationery, £100,735 for the costs of rent and renovation of Den Dover’s ‘office’, which just happened to be in his private home, and £20,767 for telephone costs (MEPs get a separate allowance for all these office expenses, and none of them are supposed to be paid from the staff budget)

£17,880 for ‘entertainment expenses’

And (just) £200 in donations to the Conservative Party (!!!).

The Parliament says that the rest of the money it wants back represents the costs of VAT that the company apparently failed to pay to the UK’s HMRC.

Dover’s defence seems mainly be to challenge the figures, claim that the Parliament should prove that the money was wrongly spent rather than force him to prove that it was properly used, and declare that the European Parliament had never made absolutely clear that MEPs might have to produce evidence of how the money had been spent. He says that the Parliament went along with the arrangements for years without challenging them or suggesting that procedures needed to be tightened.

I hope that most people elected to the European Parliament know the difference between right and wrong, honourable and dishonourable behaviour, without having to have it laid down by law. But the fact is that some do not – as recent ‘Cash for Amendments’ – revelations suggest.

The scale of abuse that seems to have become common practice amongst some MEPs was revealed in a secret report by the Parliament’s internal auditor in June 2008.

The report led to changes which have very significantly curbed the abuse of the secretarial allowance payments, but disgracefully the Parliament is still requesting that the Court of Justice keeps the auditor’s report secret – ridiculous given that it can be found on the internet.

So Dover might well feel very hard done by to have been fingered and chased by the Parliament when so many others seem to have got away with it. Indeed, I think he could have got away with it himself if he hadn’t tried to be clever and make payments through an ‘independent’ company.

Tomorrow we find out whether the Court agrees that the financial abuse was flagrant and the money must be repaid, or whether it agrees that the parliamentary rules were so lax for years that it would not be fair to demand retrospective repayments now – in which case there may be many MEPs who will wonder why we stuck not only by the rules but by the principles of financial transparency and honesty when we could have just pocketed £100,000 or two every year as some cheating bastards did.

To view this article CLICK HERE

I wonder if Nigel Farage will be considered liable under the same rules having dishonestly and corruptly paid a family member around £30,000 a year, put a block entry in his constituency office of £211,000 for office sundries, which amounted to over 50% of the expenses and paid £6,000 to have an accountant sign off the books which were fully drawn up. Condoned and colluded in the payment of around £250,000 from a UKIP enterprise into a private bank account, paid £250,000 into one of his own off shore banks in a single cheque – the list of, if not criminal, downright suspicious transfers of money in a clandestine manner is far from short!

Then of course there was the claim made as a boast to Denis McShane regarding personal profit over and above his salary and incurred expenses that he would guess he had trousered around £2 Million at that stage.

There is of course the detail of the fact that at the time Nigel Farage claimed that the various apparent scams he was involved in regarding Ashford Employment, in its various ‘guises’, that it was THE most profitable activity UKIP had ever engaged in – meanwhile The Chairman of UKIP at the time David Bannerman, claimed that less than 15% of the money raised had ever reached UKIP’s account!

No doubt were he honest Douglas Denny could throw much light on this, as he would seem to be patsy for much of the fantasies that surround UKIP accounts, having been for a period Party Secretary and the Treasurer for Nigel Farage’s EU Region. Sadly we are unlikely to get any honest answers from Douglas Denny who has a long track record of dishonesty, fantasy and abuse.

Was the truth behind what seems to be outright scams within UKIP – including the various rip offs and failure to account 100s of £1,000 of tax payers money in Petitions that were never held yet were provided with tax payers’ money and various other scams that would seem to have been funded by UKIP members unwittingly.

Was this the reason why Nigel Farage deliberately engineered the removal of Martin Hasslam which coincidentally involved Nigel Farage’s family friend and in fact protege in UKIP Buster Motrom.

The amount of quite blatant money laundering that has involved what seems very clearly to be a criminal element that have control of the leadership of UKIP is to those of us who had hoped for probity and integrity of UKIP, quite shamefull.

Break ins, thefts from offices, trousering of public money, false witness, lies about elected members and deliberate smear campaigns, desperate attemts by the filth gathered as leadership to try to defame me – all of which have spectacularly failed as not one single fact I have published in 1,000s of postings has EVER been proven wron, dishonest or misleading – then there is the harrassment and abuse of members who seek answers and a relatively indifferent police force seemingly too bone idle to investigate the thefts and fiddles of these politicians and their parasites.
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01291 – 62 65 62

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

on: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

Posted in Buster MOTRAM, Chris Davies MEP, David BANNERMAN MEP, Den Dover ex MEP, Douglas DENNY, Martin HASSLAM, Money laundering, Nigel FARAGE MEP, Parliament Magazine, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Fraud | Leave a Comment »

#0243* – AGNEW, PEARSON, BANNERMAN etc BEFOUL UKIP Members’ Principles AGAIN

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 06/01/2011

#0243* – AGNEW, PEARSON, BANNERMAN etc BEFOUL UKIP Members’ Principles AGAIN!
.

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.

Stuart AGNEW, Lord PEARSON, David BANNERMAN etc BEFOUL UKIP Members’ Principles AGAIN!
CLEARLY ALTHOUGH PLACED by UKIP AGNEW Now Oscillates in his criminality and lack of morality between his many masters – The EU, UKIP, The EFD, The NFU – in flagrant disregard for Britain or leaving The EU!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

I believe that members supporting the original principles and aims of UKIP will be interested in the article at The Midnight Group CLICK HERE.

There is a great deal more useful information available at CLICK HERE IF you can help it might be a good way for you to contribute to the campaign to leave The EU.

I see that the utterly corrupt leadership of UKIP and its parasites, not only content to condone and encourage criminality and fraud are now leaving the high ground in the anti EU membership campaign to The Tories whilst using one of the criminal elements of the leadership to betray UKIP principles and values to promote the scams and EU rip offs his long term employers have owned him to perform!

We note Stuart Agnew, one of UKIP’s placemen in their sordid claque of leadership has advocated MORE EU subsidies on behalf of his NFU?EU masters in direct opposition to the principles and values of UKIP, leaving Caroline Spellman to speak out against the EU subsidies for farming which at the end of the day is a VERY badly run business dependent, due to dishonesty and corruption, on subsidies which wrecks the economies of subsistence farmers world wide.

How this odious little man can so betray the principled grass routes of UKIP with his promotion of the utterly corrupt EU CAP beggars belief until one realises that he represents his own interests as a leading member of the EU QUANGO The NFU – which is hugely subsidised by the tax payer to uphold EU dishonesty.

We note Stuart Agnew, who has openly admitted he is a criminal and clearly admitted he is involved in fraud, money laundering and with David Bannerman stealing tax payers’ money to fund their self interest politically.

You may well remember that Stuart Agnew provided a film to The Sunday Times in which he showed clearly how UKIP was willing to act dishonestly and break the law to money launder and both he and Lord Pearson, who has betrayed UKIP in other areas and has proved both dishonourable, duplicitous and a corrupt liar elsewhere – confirmed they had already broken Electoral Law to launder money for UKIP and their personal interests – Using Global Britain (a company set up by Pearson and others).

Some background to Agnew, Pearson & Bannerman’s criminality can be found at CLICK HERE

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01291 – 62 65 62

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

on: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

Posted in David Bannerman, EFD, Lord Pearson, Money laundering, NFU, Stuart AGNEW, Sunday Times | Leave a Comment »

Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

For The Website Authors

The 20 most RECENT POSTS

POSTS & Comments SO FAR!

Archives

Categories

GOOGLE TRANSLATE

Follow me on Twitter

TWITTER N.I.Bs.

PAGES:

Just Say NO to EU

FleXit A WAY FORWARD

HoC – EU Exit Plan

EU_Referendum.com

JUNIUS On UKIP

REFERENDUM & How To Win!

Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Contact YOUR Political Servants

GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

Flying Spaghetti Monster

The EU In A Nutshell

The EUropean PARLIAMENT

The European Union

GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

The GREAT DECEPTION

The MANY NOT THE FEW

MINISTRY of DEFEAT

The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

SCARED to DEATH

Ten Years on

VIGILANCE

Voodoo Histories

WATERMELONS

Blogroll

Archive for the ‘Money laundering’ Category

#0696* – For Those Interested In UKIP & Related Corruption & Ethics!

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS

Struggling for coherence – by Richard… Thursday, November 17, 2011

Related articles

Share this:

Like this:

#0372* – UKIP – Den DOVER – Similarities & a WHISTLE CONCERT!

Former MEP faces ‘judgement day’ in ECJ hearing

Related articles

Share this:

Like this:

#0243* – AGNEW, PEARSON, BANNERMAN etc BEFOUL UKIP Members’ Principles AGAIN

Share this:

Like this: