Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

Archive for the ‘UKIP Corruption’ Category

Police Interview Annabelle Fuller Nigel Farage’s ‘Lover’

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 17/01/2015

Police Interview Annabelle Fuller Nigel Farage’s ‘Lover’
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

Police Interview Annabelle Fuller, Nigel Farage’s ‘Lover’, 3.1/2 years after she admitted theft from an MP’s flat!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
3.1/2 years after Annabelle Fuller, whilst working for Nigel Farage in one or other capacity, admitted she had breached National security by stealing a House of Commons pass, a Blackberry communication & recording device and confidential correspondence from Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen’s flat, the police fi8nally got around to interviewing her.

This does not give one much faith in British Security!

I understand that approaching a year ago the MP demanded police took action against Annabelle Fuller with regard to the implausible claims she made of sexual assault. Allegations Annabelle Fuller would seem to have dreamed up to cover her theft when caught fleeing the building by the building’s security guard.

Annabelle Fuller would seem to have appreciated her allegatiomns were implausible and unsustainable shortly after her ‘claim’ as she withdrew her allegations.

The tardy manner in which the police have dealt with this matter adds credibility to the claims of Jasna Badzak that would seem to imply that there are certain corrupt police who are aiding and abetting criminality of individuals in Ukip’s leadership team.

Allegations of criminality that would seem to be bourn out both by Douglas Denny and evidence he holds and the transcripts of Gerard Batten’s Court case against Jasna Badzak which seem clearly to show perversion of the course of Justice and dishonesty on the part of Gerard Batten and members of the police and judiciary.

Further it seems likely that various Freedom of Information applications, which seem to have presented those who are obliged to supply the data with cause to stall and wriggle in efforts to avoid supplying the facts, will when they are supplied under law may well place the criminals who were involved in Court facing serious charges and the probability of consequential custodial sentences and subsequent damages that could well bankrupt them and Ukip!

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Andrew BRIDGEN MP, Annabelle FULLER, Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, UKIP Corruption | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GP – RN: A Personalised Example Of Ukip’s Endemic Corruption

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 03/12/2014

>GP – RN: A Personalised Example Of Ukip’s Endemic Corruption
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

>GP – RN: Richard North gives A Personalised Example Of Ukip’s Endemic Corruption and shows just how long and how widely the corruption has existed in Ukip.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
further to m,y post regarding this widely covered presentation of Ukip’s endemic corruption CLICK HERE, which was in both the blogosphere and the legacy media,
Richard North has shown there is nothing new about this Ukip corruption of basic democratic principles and their unethical rigging of selection processes and elections, both internally as a party and thus corrupting UK elections, North has given details of his own direct experience and then the desperate and dishonest efforts of Ukip to try to belittle and denigrate his factual reporting of such matters.
EUReferendum

Wednesday 3 December 2014

000a Times-002 fixed.jpg

The trouble with doing reviews of Times pieces is that they are behind the paywall, so you can’t just link to them and rely on the reader to click-through to get the details, thereby only having to publish the bare bones of the story. You have to post virtually the whole thing, which sometimes means giving more emphasis to a story than it merits.

This would have been the case with this not very important story, albeit on the front page (above). It’s about UKIP rigging their own selection procedures for MEP candidates. Fortunately, though, the Independent has run it, which means I don’t have to go into the detail.

The reason I needed to mention it at all is to make a quick point, as part of a more general piece about Ukip, correcting what appears to be a standard attack briefing that party supporters use to libel me on comment threads, in a usually forlorn attempt at character assassination.

The claim is made that I resigned the party “before I was pushed”, after the election of Godfrey Bloom as Yorkshire Region MEP in 2004. To stop this falsehood spreading it, I have to rebut it. In fact, I resigned in 2003, in protest at the way the selection procedure had been rigged, and the way Farage, with the complicity of David Lott, then party chairman, quite deliberately blocked the appeal which could have set aside this selection and put me in pole position.

It is the case, therefore, that Ukip has been rigging its selection processes for many years, which partly explains why so many of the current batch of MEPs are such dross. Any such assertion from me, though, brings forward the accusation that I hold a “grudge” against The Dear Leader – so it is useful to have the legacy media detail other examples of rigged selection – doubtless because it too has a “grudge”.

Actually, no one who knows me would ever suggest that I had such a base relationship with a man with whom I shared a desk for four years, and for whom I wrote speeches. Life is far too short. And even if I had become a Ukip MEP, I would almost certainly have resigned over the embarrassing Kilroy debacle, so the past hasn’t been changed that much. Right now, I would still be out on my own.

Rather than a grudge, what I do have is the most profound contempt for Farage – the calm, icy sort. Any passion has long gone. And that’s actually a very different thing. Outside the cult, his incompetence, dishonesty and other less than savoury personal attributes do not really support any other view, but above all else, his attempts actively to block policy development have to be the most important reasons for regarding him in such an unfavourable light.

Overall, this “rolling dysfunction” is holding back the party and threatens to bring down the entire anti-EU movement. An example of the immediate effects are picked up by Dr Eric Edmund, a perceptive critic of Ukip and its leader. He links to yet another train-wreck interview, this one with current chairman, Steve Crowther, graphically illustrating the policy chaos that exists within the party.

This is chaos which intensifies by the hour, after Farage disowned a policy on camera, despite it having been minted by deputy leader Nutall at the Doncaster conference in September – of which Farage was apparently unaware. That left him to admit he had “misspoken“, after being forced to acknowledge that the policy on sex education remained party policy.

However, frequenting – as one does – the occasional comment thread, I recently had my own personal epiphany, coming to the realisation that Ukip’s root problem is that its people don’t even understand what policy is. Even with the benefit of a thoroughly-grounded seminar in the principles of policy-making, I asserted, they wouldn’t understand what they were being told, much less be able to put it into practice.

What, in essence, the party is producing is a list of aspirations rather than policies. The core failure is the lack of any connection between what they want to happen, and the means of making those things happen, in such a way that one can be assured that the outcomes are deliverable. This confusion between aspiration and policy means that the party can never progress to a state of coherence.

Party supporters, on the other hand (and not entirely unreasonably), point to the similar inadequacies of the established parties. But this simply highlights the further failure to understand the nature of politics. It is for the challengers, with no track record, to demonstrate their capabilities. Conventionally, this is done through the mechanism of policy statements – something which Ukip has so far failed to do.

Over the months to come, this failing will become increasingly evident, as Mr Cameron unveils his “play”, with which he seeks to undermine and eventually destroy the upstart. Putting together a series of technical measures, complete with some theatrical contrast provided by apparently obstructive Poles, he will attempt to do this by delivering a policy which shows that he has the potential to control immigration from within the EU.

On the other hand, Ukip – despite making immigration its core issue, eliding it with its anti-EU sentiment – has failed yet to deliver a credible (or any) policy on how it would control immigration from outwith the EU.

It has failed in this context to realise that “controlling our borders” is not a policy, per se, but an aspiration – and a wholly unrealistic one at that. As long as the UK admits 34 million visitors to this country each year – the majority without visas – it has effectively ceded perimeter control, the system then relying on other layers and stratagems.

The party might be better off calling for control over immigration policy. That is an altogether more realistic and focused aspiration than “controlling and managing our borders”, which it currently tells us it would seek to do. The act or process of “controlling and managing” is exactly that – an act or process – a means to an end. In policy terms, it is meaningless without declared objective and then the detail of how the controlling and managing would be done.

Nor indeed does it help having Ukip telling us that: “We will extend to EU citizens the existing points-based system for time-limited work permits”. That does not begin to constitute a policy. Nor even is it, in itself, a component of a policy.

To have the makings of a policy, the putative policy would have to be directed to, and linked with, a specific objective or outcome. It would then have to be couched in such terms as to make it clear that it could contribute to the declared objective – whatever that might be. Any system or process, as such, is blind – and has as much a capability to obstruct as support any particular policy line.

But where the real policy wonks play is in co-ordination – the thing known more commonly as “joined up policy”. The “perfect” policy is one thing, but can get a little bit raggy when you have to take other considerations into account. For instance, you might well come up with the best in highly-polished defence policies, only to have it fall apart when your foreign policy delivers you enemies you didn’t want, didn’t expect and can’t fight – a bit like UK policy really.

Here, the rank amateurism of Ukip comes to the fore, best evident when one reads that: “UKIP would not seek to remain in the European Free Trade Area (EFTA) or European Economic Area (EEA) while those treaties maintain a principle of free movement of labour, which prevents the UK managing its own borders”.

Now here one must recall that Ukip hasn’t actually declared what it is trying to achieve, and we also know that “managing” borders is not a policy as such, but a process. So we end up with a political party that is prepared to ditch a proven and workable trade relationship because it interrupts an indeterminate process aimed at an undefined effect, with no specified outcome.

In this event, we are open to the suggestion that Ukip may be well-motivated and be seeking a desirable outcome. But since the party has neither defined its preferred outcome nor any credible means by which it might achieve it, we can be excused from accepting that it has any policies.

Meanwhile, we can see Mr Cameron’s policy being rolled out, the overall objective undeclared but loosely translated as “stuff Ukip”. Helping in this noble endeavour are his allies who are talking down immigration. They are also rubbishing the “Norway option”, something they have in common with Ukip – which must tell you something.

Meanwhile, we have the entertaining prospect of theatrical Poles, providing the backcloth for Mr Cameron’s stunning victory to come. The harder he has to battle, the better and more convincing he will look.

If Ukip had policies, of course, it would be easier to assess Mr Cameron’s games, by reference to what Ukip had on offer. One would simply compare what is with what could be. That’s the way politics is supposed to work. Poor Ukip, though, hasn’t discovered this yet – and Farage never will. If his party grows up, things might be different but, for the moment, contempt seems in order for the Peter Pan of politics.

Richard North 03/12/2014

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Richard NORTH, UKIP, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Dishonesty | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Yet More Ukip Corruption In Lincolnshire

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 01/12/2014

Yet More Ukip Corruption In Lincolnshire
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

 Yet More Ukip Corruption In Lincolnshire, yet another rigging of selection process – this time in Ukip’s No. 2 target Westminster Seat!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
yet further provenance of the total corruption of the process of democracy within Ukip – a circumstance repeated time and time again making a total mokery of the much vaunted principles of democracy in Ukip.
There is absolutely no doubt that there has been constant and continuous rigging of Ukip selection and election processes. Ukip has been utterly dishonest in its due process and has not only rigged selections and elections but has used them to steal money from their members – offering democracy and votes to members who had put their names forward with various payments required to obtain the right to stand for el;ection!
Corruption in Ukip and overt fraud has been endemic, whether as when Douglas Denny dishonestly acted for Nigel Farage to do all he could to ensure Farage was elected leader – a stunning act of corruption and dishonesty from someone supposedly empowered as the Returning Officer for the election with the duty to ensure ‘fair play’ and adherence to the rules yet himself cheating for Nigel Farage directly!
Douglas Denny was caught out, in no small part by this blog which exposed the corruption, subsequently he was removed as Returning Officer by the NEC, regardless of his hissy fit and lies to try to cover his tracks. Douglas Denny’s removal however (which is fully documented despite intervention dishonestly to try to remove all the evidence given by my blogs) However unfortunately by that time the damage was done and the election of Farage was nothing more than a corrupt coronation.
There are many more examples of the corruption of Ukip which have beenconclusively proven – below is just yet another example:

Nigel Farage with Robin Hunter-Clarke

UKIP’s oft-burnished reputation as a democratic grassroots party is set to take a battering with its own members — after the party’s top committee intervened to install one of their own number as the candidate for their #2 target seat.

With polling from Survation giving the party a massive 20-point lead, 22 year-old councillor and National Executive Committee (NEC) member Robin Hunter-Clarke is set to become the youngest MP in more than 30 years if he prevails in the Lincolnshire seat of Boston and Skegness, which is second only to Clacton in its demographic receptiveness to UKIP.

But emails leaked to Scrapbook lay bare a conspiracy amongst party top brass to install Hunter-Clarke as candidate. The day before the selection hustings was to take place, shortlisted candidates received a message from a local party official notifying them of “an anomalous situation”:

“I greatly regret that this situation has arisen and I hope that you will appreciate that it has done so solely as a result of the intervention of the NEC.

Apparently they’d decided to unilaterally install Hunter-Clarke on the shortlist, with corrupt former Tory minister Neil Hamilton withdrawing his name:

“The shortlist was duly drawn up and was submitted to the NEC. Unusually, they made adjustments to the list and one name was withdrawn and was replaced by another.

And it gets even more stinky. It turns out that Hunter-Clarke was not only on the NEC, which nobbled proceedings in his favour, but also the local committee which drew up the original shortlist in August — meaning he had seen his opponents’ CVs and had the inside track on their strengths and weaknesses.

The local party proposed sharing CVs amongst the other hopefuls — but UKIP’s head of candidates David Soutter didn’t respond until, errrr, the day before the selection meeting:

“Clearly, this was an undesirable situation and the only remedy seemed to be for all of you to have sight of each others’ CVs in order to create a level playing field.

“I wrote to [David Soutter] setting out the situation and suggesting the above remedy. That was 2½ weeks ago and I have just today received Mr. Soutter’s agreement as to this proposed course of action.

Hilariously, Soutter then refused to tell locals which candidate had prevailed at the meeting until a week later:

We’re currently awaiting a statement from ‘Kipper HQ, who insist the whole process has been above board.

UPDATE: UKIP statement: “Steps were taken to ensure that the selection in Boston and Skegness was a fair and balanced one. Robin Hunter-Clarke was selected by to fight the seat by an overriding and overwhelming vote by the Branch.”​

To view the original article CLICK HERE
Further comments ‘e’Mailed to me adds further details to this story of typical Ukip corruption:
Robin Hunter-Clarke was not only on the NEC, which nobbled proceedings in his favour, but also the local committee which drew up the original short-list in August — meaning he had seen his opponents’ CVs and had the inside track on their strengths and weaknesses.

Hunter Clarke is of course a Farage sycophant, and he makes much of being a local lad.  The problem is that he in fact lives in Chester where he is a law student.  Quite how he is going to manage to keep up with his studies is anyone’s guess, let alone fulfil his responsibilities as a councillor in Lincolnshire!
Hunter Clarke faces 260 mile round trips to attend council meetings in Lincoln, and be fully available to his constituents on local matters.  This appears not only to be exhausting for the young chap but potentially very expensive for the public.

He has been parachuted into the Boston & Skegness parliamentary seat – without a bye or leave to the local party.  Even though he has precious little experience of life (he’s still a student) he already sits on the UKIP NEC and is Chairman of a UKIP branch, and he’s a p/t councillor.  Now he’s set to be a PPC for UKIP, and possibly an MP!  What skills does he have to achieve such a rapid rise to prominence, apart from being a sycophant?  If elected will he continue to ‘read law’ and be a p/t MP as he is a p/t councillor?  Or will he become yet another career politico who will never have any first hand experience of the real world?

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Boston, David Soutter, Lincolnshire, Robin Hunter - Clarke, UKIP, UKIP Corruption | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

>GUEST POST: Summarising The Vile Behaviour Of Gerard Batten

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 06/11/2014

>GUEST POST: Summarising The Vile Behaviour Of Gerard Batten
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

 >GUEST POST by Louise Mensch:

Summarising The Vile Behaviour Of the Ukip MEP Gerard Batten in bullying and harrassing Jasna Badzak whom he would seem to have colluded with apparently corrupt police officers to persecute and abuse.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
having been the target of the lies and distortions of Gerard Batten myself in the past, where by distorting the facts he colluded with, what seemed to be corrupt police, to try to have me arrested and prosecuted in clear abuse of his elected public office as a servant of the people.
I was in fact arrested and interrogated for around 3 hours based upon Gerard Batten’s corrupt dishonesty, mainly regarding his overt racism and publications seemingly designed to incite racial hatred, distrust and possible violence.
Fortunately the South Wales Police were less inclined to jump to his bidding and advised I had done no wrong and nno further action was possible on the part of the Met. Police who were working for Gerard Batten and Ukip and seemingly in cahoots in the corruption.
Having seen a copy of Jasna Badzak’s most recent arrest warrant/notification:
BADZAK ARREST CHARGES 01 04-Nov-2014
and being all too well aware of the corruption, bullying, lies and general abuse of office by Ukip, its leadership clique and its claque I regret I find all that Louise Mensch has had to say in her GUEST POST below, just as the Post by Lee Jasper in his original posting I found totally plausible and more than likely.
I believe Gerard Batten is beneath contempt and sadly he does little damage to Ukip for those who have a grasp of the shamefull standards of the low lifes who lead and in many cases exploit it for their personal gain and in keeping with their lack of ethics and integrity in persuit of racist aims, anti homosexual beliefs and willingness to lie with the aplombe of their leader Nigel Farage who would seem, like so many sociopaths, all too willing to preside over an utterly befouled organisation seemingly created in his own disgusting image.
Galvin Reardon

Why Was Jasna Badzak Arrested for RTing a Critical Blog about UKIP?

Jasna Badzak is a former member of UKIP.

She has a conviction for fraud (of a month’s salary and travel expenses) for the MEP for whom she used to work, Gerard Batten. She protests her innocence. She had no prior criminal record, had a high-level security clearance and was of good character as determined in court.

So far, so clear.

Ms. Badzak is also a cardiac patient.

On 4th November Ms. Badzak was arrested by a Detective Sergeant in the Major Crimes Unit at Westminster for the alleged crime of harassing Gerard Batten MEP. Despite her cardiac condition, the unusual decision was taken by the DS concerned to force her and her lawyer to attend the police station in person to be arrested.

He stated that this was done after consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service.

I understand that the criminal offence of “harassment” with which she was charged constitutes RTing a blog by the socialist former deputy Mayor of London Lee Jasper, and over an article allegedly published in the Sunday Times.

The blog contains Mr. Jasper’s impressions of Ms. Badzak’s various accusations against Batten and UKIP and how the police dealt with them. While I certainly cannot endorse all it contains (simply because I have no knowledge of various matters) Jasper is clear that he describes allegations, rather than facts. I read the blog carefully. It is more about alleged corruption in the Met than it is about Mr. Batten, whom it mentions in passing. Nowhere does the blog make threats towards Mr. Batten. Nowhere does it use racial or religious slurs against him. It is not in the league of actual online harassment against a politician such as that leveled against Stella Creasy MP or Luciana Berger MP.

Furthermore, the arresting officer has arrested, for harassment, ONLY Ms. Badzak. He has not contacted Lee Jasper, who wrote the blog, or Michael Crick of Channel Four News, who earlier RTed the blog. Mr. Crick called the DS in question and asked if he should present himself for arrest too, having also RTed the blog, and earlier than Ms. Badzak did. No reply was forthcoming. I have asked the arresting officer to explain what Major Crime has been committed; why Ms Badzak was required to attend in person given her medical condition; and which of his superiors in the Met knew the grounds on which Ms. Badzak was arrested.

I have obtained, as a journalist, some evidence of threats made by specific Metropolitan Police officers against other journalists – for clarity, not myself, Michael Crick, nor Lee Jasper (qua blogger), but a separate journalist.

As I believe that a great abuse of power is being committed here, and that there is evidence of deeply troubling and improper collusion between some officers of the Metropolitan Police Force and politicians to act against a private citizen, I shall be submitting the evidence I hold to the following people and bodies:

The Home Affairs Select Committee

The IPCC

Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe

and the Electoral Commission.

However, as the emails I have obtained appear to involve improper actions by police officers, there must be transparency. Complaining to police officers about police officers does not always, alas, produce the results one would wish.

Therefore I am now going to type out the exact content of the email sent to a journalist by a Met Police officer. I am leaving out everything that could identify any of the parties involved, including the date, the location, the names of the publications, the recipient, or the sender. But unredacted evidence will be sent to those parties I have identified above. The email was sent to a journalist at a national publication.

Dear Sirs

It has been brought to the attention of the Metropolitan Police, that in recent days journalist [sic] from [publication – redacted] and [publication – redacted] have been provided material by an unknown source about the political affairs of Mr. Gerard Batten MEP. An ex-employee of Mr. Batten’s  has [redacted] been charged with numerous dishonesty offences [sic] and is currently awaiting trial at Southwark Crwon Court [sic]. Part of the bail conditions for this ex-employee is not to contact directly or indirectly Mr. Batten. This condition is in place to prevent any further publication of articles which the Courts have deemed to be untruthful and concerning to Mr. Batten.

Any articles published which are linked to the subject may result in further arrests being made. I request that while these ongoing Court proceedings are underway that you thoroughly check the sources of the information, prior to contacting either Mr. Batten or going to press.

regards

[signature of the officer. The officer lists themselves as being a “Financial Investigator”]

The journalist replies that they have attempted to contact the officer by phone but failed to reach them. I am omitting this in case it offers identifying information. The journalist’s reply goes on

I spoke to Gerard Batten about his alleged links to far-right groups such as [redacted].

I fail to see how this is relevant to a serving Met officer investigating financial crime. Why have you chosen to intervene in this matter on Batten’s behalf, copying him into our exchange on his private email address?

Most people would interpret it as an attempt to warn me off writing about Batten. This, I believe, is a potential abuse of office.

I’d be grateful if you could respond to the following questions by 7pm tonight:

Who asked you to contact me? Was it Batten or somebody else in your unit/team who knows Batten?

What is your relationship to Batten?

Are you a member or supporter of UKIP?

Are you a member or supporter of [redacted] or any other [redacted] organisation?

The reporter then signs off. I have also seen an email from the reporter to Mr. Batten.

….but I wanted to know why you asked [name of officer] at the Met Police to get in touch with me about something to do with a fraud case when I spoke to you [redacted] about something completely different, i.e. your relationship with [redacted] and [redacted]?

You’ll be familiar with this exchange as [name of officer] copied you in and stated my recent contact with you had been “brought to the attention of the Metropolitan Police” – clearly by you or someone in your office – and then went on to allege that I had been “provided material by an unknown source” without any proof of this. [name of officer] – a financial investigator – said it was all to do with your “political affairs”. So what’s it got to do with him? He even suggested I could be arrested if I published an article about you.

I’d be grateful for your explanation as I have some concerns about such an intervention by the police on behalf of a politician.

I am redacting the rest of the email, but there is nothing further substantive to it.

You will note that in both cases here, an officer unconnected to the appropriate department appears to be taking unwarranted actions against Ms. Badzak, and in favour of Mr. Batten. The one officer, whose emails I quote here, is a Financial Investigator writing about “the political affairs of Mr. Gerard Batten MEP”. The other officer, a different person, who required Ms. Badzak to attend in person for arrest on the charge of harassment for RTing the critical blog, is with the “Major Crimes Unit”. That officer’s response was to tell me to “go through channels” if I had questions for the Metropolitan Police. I do not have any questions for the Metropolitan Police (as of yet). I have questions for that specific officer. I told that officer so and I await that officer’s reply before escalating the complaint.

Lee Jasper’s blog is an extraordinary read. It is important to say that I have no idea what in it is truthful or not truthful, but there is one thing in his blog I do want to verify from evidence that I have in my own possession. Here I am quoting sections of his blog on the existence or otherwise (!) of two Metropolitan Police Officers. (I cannot verify that what he reports they did or didn’t do is accurate; he is reporting what Ms. Jadzak told him.)

All of her complaints were being handled by a Metropolitan Police Officer, one Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon. Despite repeated requests for updates on what was happening to her complaints she had no response from Reardon.

…..She reported this intimidation [LM- referred to earlier in LJ blog] to the Met and was surprised to find out that yet again these complaints were being refereed to a Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon, the very same officer who had failed to investigate her initial complaints of UKIP racism and EU fraud.

Worried about escalating violent intimidation and seeking to cope with her own failing health, Jasna then seeks a restraining order court injunction against Batten in Feb 2012.

Met officer supports UKIP. 

Here’s where the begins to get interesting, MPS Detective James Galvin turns up at court, embraces Gerard Batten proceeds to tell the court that the MPS has no record of any allegations against Batten nor were there any current, active police investigation into him. That was a lie and, as the MPS has now admitted Galvin, had no authority to represent the Met or attend court. Her case was eventually dismissed as a result.

Gerard Batten, then formally wrote to the MPS on October 5th 2012 reporting his fraud allegations against Jasna. He actually wrote his allegation on UKIP letterhead, which must constitute and attempt to politically influence the investigation.  The Met having failed to investigate any of Jasna serious previous allegations, then acted immediately upon receipt of Battens complaints. .

Jasna was subsequently arrested on 29th November 2011, when surprise, surprise, Detectives Constable James Galvin and Detective Sargent Shaun Reardon both, attended her home. They wanted to arrest her there and then, but she Jasna was so ill, it was decided to take her to hospital instead.

The Met formally denies the existence of two serving police officers misleading the Prime Minister David Cameron. 

Subsequent to her eventual arrest and charging, Jasna wrote to the Met Commissioner Bernard Hogan Howe asking, why her many complaints to the MPS had not been investigated? This she pointed out, was in total contrast to the Mets swift and immediate response to Battens complaint.

This lead to another key question, why had DC Galvin had turned up at the injunction hearing, defending Batten?

The answer, when it came, was as shocking as it was unexpected. The Mets Department of Professional Standards informed her that the Metropolitan Police Service employed no such named police officers. Shocked and alarmed she persisted and again she was told again that no such officers were employed by the Met.

She then wrote to the Independent Police Compliant Commission who after some time, wrote back, confirming, that after discussions with the Met, they too  confirmed that no such officers existed.

Jasna at this stage was completely frustrated and wrote to Mayor of London, Boris Johnson and Prime Minister David Cameron. Both men wrote to the Met and both were told, in writing, that no such officers worked for the Met.

The fact is the Prime Minister, the Mayor of London and the IPCC, were mislead and possibly willfully mislead, by the Met DPS about the existence of these two officers.

This begs they very important questions as to precise circumstances that led to two of the most senior Tory politicians in the land were provided with inaccurate and misleading information?

I can confirm in this blog that I have, in my possession, the following evidence:

1. A letter to Jasna Badzak from a third officer at the Met Police’s Directorate for Professional Standards saying that they could not investigate a complaint against officers Galvin and Reardon because they did not exist “the officers you have named as being officers of the MPS are not officers with the MPS. I have throughly interrogated all MPS systems and cannot find any trace of those officers.”

2. An email  to Jasna Badzak from the same officer dated 10 Jan, 2013, again repeating that these two officers, do not exist (following her astonished protests of disbelief, since these officers had actually shown up at her house and arrested her).

Jasna Galvin 2

3. Firm evidence that, in a phone call to Ms. Badzak, a fourth officer – this time of the rank of Inspector, I think it is important to state that – spoke to her about this matter and stated

Insp: “In 2012, I understand you attempted to make a complaint about officers Fleming, Galvin and Reardon… you made a complaint.” Ms. Badzak said she had made a complaint to the Mayor of London and the Prime Minister, who, she said, wrote to Bernard Hogan-Howe, who, she said, passed it further down. The Inspector replied “Yes”. “And I got the reply which I got which said that these police officers do not exist,” Ms. Badzak responded. “Yes,” the Inspector replied. “We made an error, and I apologize for that error.” Ms Badzak exclaimed “You made an error!” The Inspector replied “Yes. They do exist. It wasn’t correct what we told you.” Ms B: “So why did you tell me that, then?” Insp “The officer who made that decision, and told you, is on a career break, he’s not in the country, I can’t ask him why. But it may be that he misread our database. You know – sometimes people make human errors. But the bottom line is we made a mistake, I apologize, we made a mistake.

Again – Ms Badzak was arrested, November 4th, by a DS in the Major Crimes Unit, Westminster, for “harassment” of Gerard Batten, MEP, for RTing a blog in which these allegations are detailed.

Personally, I believe in transparency. I am absolutely confident of my evidence and I present it here in order that there be as little cover-up going forwards as possible. I am prepared to make my evidence available to the IPCC and other sources.

One officer threatening a journalist

A separate officer in the Major Crimes Squad arresting Ms Badzak for harassment

A third officer from the Directorate of Professional Standards denying the existence of Met Police Officers (twice, and in detail, and emphatically) that Ms. Badzak claims harassed her

A fourth officer of the rank of Inspector telling Ms Badzak that the officer who denied their existence was “on a career break” “out of the country” “I can’t ask him why” “It may be that he misread our database”

Clearly, this matter goes beyond any kind of politics to the very deepest, darkest abuses of our capital’s major police force against a private citizen. I am not an investigative journalist (thankfully, Mr Crick does have those credentials) but I recognize shocking abuse when I see it, and I hope I have enough of a sense of duty not to remain silent when I am confronted with hard evidence of injustice being done.

Post navigation

3 thoughts on “Why Was Jasna Badzak Arrested for RTing a Critical Blog about UKIP?”

  1. A search for MPS Detective James Galvin does not produce anything. He does not seem to be an MPS officer or has been retired for some time.

  2. Hi,

    I can confirm the style of behaviour of Ukip’s MEP Gerard Batten and his apparent collusion with what seems, all too clearly, to be a corrupt element of the police.

    Whether the police in question are current or ex members of the BNP or current or past members of Ukip and or other extremist groups is hard to ascertain – due largely to the clandestine nature of those concerned and their lack of transparency.

    I am able to confirm the behaviour having been investigated by police named in Jasna Badzak’s case and having been arrested and interviewed under caution on their instruction – based upon the lies or at very least distortions of fact by Gerard Batten.

    Regards,
    Greg_L-W.
    Greg Lance-Watkins
    Greg_L-W@BTconnect . com

    http://ukip-vs-eukip.com

To view the original of this GUEST BLOG CLICK HERE.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Gerard BATTEN, Jasna Badzak, Lee Jasper, Louise Mensch, Michael Crick, Nigel FARAGE, Police, Police Corruption, UKIP, UKIP Corruption | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

What Goes Around Comes Around in Ukip For The Corrupt Douglas Denny

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 06/11/2014

What Goes Around Comes Around in Ukip For The Corrupt Douglas Denny
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

What Goes Around Comes Around in Ukip For The Corrupt Douglas Denny after his lies and abuse for Nigel Farage he now realises what rigging elections and selections for Farage’s party feels like when the victim!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
after all those years of telling lies on behalf of Nigel Farage and corruptly rigging elections for him it would seem his own dishonesty has caught up with him and Farage’s authoritarian central control of the party, in denial of democratic principles is now working against him – effectively Douglas Denny hasn’t a leg to stand on as he discovers loyalty in Ukip is a one way street.
Douglas Denny is finding out just what it is like to be at the receiving end of the sort of vile behaviour he was so long at the center of meting out his lies and distortions, a style Denny himself did so much to set up.

Ukip ditches its candidate for Portsmouth South

Douglas Denny

Douglas Denny

Roger Bird, general secretary of Ukip, confirmed to The News that Douglas Denny was no longer the prospective parliamentary candidate (PPC) following a decision by the party’s national executive committee (NEC).

It followed confusion about Mr Denny’s position, with the chairman of the Portsmouth Ukip branch unaware of the deselection and speaking of his shock when he was told yesterday.

Mr Denny was elected as the candidate by the local branch last year.

Mr Bird said the party’s ruling committee had removed Mr Denny from the position, but that he was free to apply to other constituencies.

‘He has responded so we know he has received this notification,’ said Mr Bird.

‘There have been other incidents where the NEC has chosen to open the field of candidates to a wider field.

‘It’s nothing personal against him. He’s a long-standing member of the party – someone for whom I have a lot of respect.’

Mr Bird added similar deselections had taken place in other constituencies.

He said: ‘It’s a more routine event than it might otherwise feel.

‘Internally we don’t see it as being serious or malicious or disciplinary. It’s simply a process which the party goes through.’

Stuart Potter, branch chairman, said he understood Mr Denny remained the candidate until The News notified him of a statement it had received from the party.

He said he was ‘not happy’ about the decision.

He added: ‘He would have been an exceedingly good candidate. We have put a lot of resources into Doug and got him known as the PPC. There’s been a lot of footwork done and he has been to meetings with us. It’s a bit of a shock, but we have to move forward.’

He said the branch would now have a new round of applications before a hustings later this year.

A party statement said Mr Denny’s position was withdrawn in early October ‘at which point the UKIP Portsmouth Association was informed’. Mr Bird added: ‘It seems as though communication has not filtered its way through the branch.’

Mr Denny was not available for comment.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Douglas DENNY, Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, UKIP Corrupt Elections, UKIP Corruption | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

UKIP & Farage’s Unprofessional Sleaze Ever More Consistent

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/04/2014

UKIP & Farage’s Unprofessional Sleaze Ever More Consistent
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

UKIP & Nigel Farage’s Unprofessional Sleaze Ever More Consistent making them an ever better dustbin for the protest vote in EU Elections & explaining why they are such a failure in Domestic Politics with their lack of infrastructure and self serving leadership with its constant squabbling & consistent corruption & betrayal of the electorate.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

Now Ukip’s second poster boy builder is revealed to be an IRISH actor as Farage battles to contain row over supporter’s tweets about ‘evil’ Islam

• ‘Builder’ seen begging in the street is Dave O’Rourke from Dublin
• Featured in £1.5million poster campaign against EU immigration
• Gaffe follows suspension of Andre Lampitt who wore builder’s hat in TV ad
• The Zimbabwean branded the Prophet Mohammed a paedophile on Twitter
By MATT CHORLEY, MAILONLINE POLITICAL EDITOR
PUBLISHED: 12:27, 25 April 2014 | UPDATED: 12:48, 25 April 2014

Ukip is battling to rescue its flagship £1.5million ad campaign today, after it emerged a builder who featured in a poster complaing about foreign workers is actually an actor from Ireland.
The gaffe emerged just hours after the party suspended a second man who appeared in an election broadcast video wearing a hard hat for a series of tweets which condemned Islam as ‘evil and branded the Prophet Mohammed a paedophile.
Ukip leader Nigel Farage today admitted ‘something went wrong’ with the party’s vetting system.
Scroll down for video

Ukip faced embarrassment today after it emerged the builder in its latest anti-immigration advert was an actor, Dave O'Rourke, who is from Ireland
Ukip faced embarrassment today after it emerged the builder in its latest anti-immigration advert was an actor, Dave O’Rourke, who is from Ireland

Ukip leader Nigel Farage admitted something had gone wrong with the party's vetting system
Ukip leader Nigel Farage admitted something had gone wrong with the party’s vetting system

 

Never rains then it pours: Ukip leader Nigel Farage admitted something had gone wrong with the party's vetting system

Never rains then it pours: Ukip leader Nigel Farage admitted something had gone wrong with the party’s vetting system

 

 
Still smiling: Nigel Farage is faring well in the polls ahead of the European elections next month

Still smiling: Nigel Farage is faring well in the polls ahead of the European elections next month

The row comes despite attempts to improve the party’s image and prevent a repeat of last year’s local election campaign which was dominated by controversy about the outburst and behaviour of candidates.

On Tuesday Mr Farage unveiled a series of hard-hitting anti-immigration posters as part of its campaign for the European elections on May 22.

 One featured a builder begging on the street with the message: ‘EU policy at work. British workers are hit hard by unlimited cheap labour.’

But today it emerged the man is not a builder at all, but actor Dave O’Rourke from Dublin.

HOW UKIP SAW ITS £1.5MILLION CAMPAIGN RUN INTO TROUBLE

The launch of the anti-immigration poster campaign on Tuesday was supposed to mark the start of a new, more professional era for Ukip.

The award-winning Edinburgh-based advertising agency Family – which has worked for the BBC, Debenhams and the Conservatives – helped produce the campaign funded by ex-Tory donor Paul Sykes.

But critics branded the slogans ‘racist’, even before revelations about the people in the poster and TV adverts plunged the party into turmoil.

Builder posted offensive tweets

 
Zimbabwean decorator Andre Lampitt appeared in the Ukip party political broadcast to complain about the impact of immigration in Britain

 

Builder in TV advert posts racist tweets
Zimbabwean decorator Andre Lampitt posed in a builder’s hard hat to complain that ‘lads from Eastern Europe’ were undercutting him.

But on Twitter he posted a series of offensive comments,  claiming Ed Miliband is ‘not British’, condemned Islam as ‘evil’, branding the Prophet Mohammed a paedophile and saying he wanted Africans to ‘kill themselves off’.

UKIP RESPONSE: Nigel Farage: ‘Repellent was the word we used, and I will stick with that. We have put in place a vetting procedure and something has gone wrong.’

‘Voter’ is Ukip events manager

 
Lizzy Vaid appears as a voter from Devon in the new Ukip manifesto, but actually works for the party

 

Lizzy Vaid appears in a full-page photograph as a voter from Devon, but is actually Ukip’s events manager and an assistant to the party leader.

UKIP RESPONSE: Nigel Farage: ‘The fact that Lizzie Laid is half-Indian and works for us is as far as we are concerned a non-issue. Most parties use actors. We use Ukippers.’

‘Jobless builder’ is an Irish actor

 
Ukip faced embarrassment today after it emerged the builder in its latest anti-immigration advert was an actor, Dave O'Rourke, who is from Ireland

 

Eye-catching poster shows a builder begging on the street with the message: ‘EU policy at work. British workers are hit hard by unlimited cheap labour.’

But he is Dave O’Rourke, an actor from Ireland who moved to Britain 10 years ago.

UKIP RESPONSE: Director of communications Patrick O’Flynn: ‘The vast majority of people used in political poster campaigns are actors. It is totally standard practice.’

 

On his profile on the acting website StarNow, he boasts of being able to speak in several accents including Irish, South African, English, Scottish and German.

He says: ‘I’m originally from Dublin, Living in the UK 10 years. I’m currently acting full time and looking to build my portfolio.

‘I’m hard working and fully committed to a role and my character to give the best performance I can deliver.’

His CV includes a part as ‘a troubled youth with psychotic tendencies’ in Saltwater, a 2001 Irish drama with In Bruges and Harry Potter star Brendan Gleeson.

He has since taken part in two drama courses in Edinburgh and played an HMRC officer in the 2008 drama Adulthood.

People from Ireland are able to move freely to the UK under the immigration rules which Mr Farage is campaigning against.

To add to the embarrassment, only this week Mr Farage boasted: ‘Most parties use actors. We use Ukippers.’

It followed the revelation that ‘Lizzy Vaid from Devon’ who featured in the party’s manifesto is actually Ukip’s events manager based in London.

Today Ukip director of communications Patrick O’Flynn insisted: ‘The vast majority of people used in political poster campaigns are actors. It is totally standard practice.’

The gaffe comes after Ukip moved to suspend Andre Lampit, a decorator who appeared in a party political broadcast.

Mr Lampitt had previously condemned Mr Miliband as ‘not a real Brit’ and suggested Africans should ‘kill themselves off’.

In a series of posts on Twitter, he said he loathed the charity Oxfam and welcomed Aids outbreaks in Africa, saying: ‘Inner peace will come when Aids does what it should and reduce  African density.’

Like Mr Farage, he said he admired Russian leader Vladimir Putin, adding: ‘At least Putin loves his country. David Cameron does not love Britain, he loves the EU.’

Asked about Mr Lampitt’s comments, Mr Farage said: ‘Repellent was the word we used, and I will stick with that. We have got the European elections happening, we have also got local elections and we have got 2,234 candidates standing for Ukip.

‘It’s our biggest ever push in local elections. We have put in place a vetting procedure and something has gone wrong.’

Pressed on whether he viewed Mr Lampitt’s comments as racist, Mr Farage told BBC Breakfast: ‘I think they probably are, yes.’

He added: ‘Someone has made a mistake, so I’m going to have an investigation into this and somebody must be disciplined for this.’

Ukip said it was ‘shocked’ by his views, which will embarrass the party as it prepares for local elections next month – with Mr Lampitt standing as a councillor in Merton, South London.

The builder, who describes himself as ‘born British in Rhodesia’, was one of five supporters hand-picked to appear in a prime-time television campaign starting this week.

He was featured in the broadcast criticising immigration from the EU, saying: ‘Since the lads from Eastern Europe are prepared to work for a lot less than anybody else, I’ve found it a real struggle.’

Yesterday, the party said it was suspending him after discovering he had expressed ‘repellent’ views in a series of potentially unlawful messages on Twitter over recent months.

In one tweet Mr Lampitt claimed that Islam was not a religion and called it an ‘evil organisation respecting a prophet who as a pedo.’[sic]

He added: ‘All Muslims need to leave Europe… or denounce their pathetic satanic religion.’

Zimbabwean decorator Andre Lampitt appeared in the Ukip party political broadcast to complain about the impact of immigration in Britain


UKIP leader Nigel Farage admits: ‘something has gone wrong’
 

Another message insisted: ‘Most Nigerians are generally bad people… I  grew up in Africa and dare anyone to prove me wrong.’

He suggested Africans should be ‘left to ‘kill themselves off’ and suggested people should ‘get over’ slavery, which he said was an ‘act of war’.

‘His racist views might even make the BNP wince with embarrassment’

Tim Farron, Lib Dem president

 

Condemning the Labour leader, he said: ‘Miliband is not a real Brit. I  hope he never gets to be PM! He was only born here.’

In another message, he said Mr Miliband, whose father Ralph was born in Belgium to Polish parents, was ‘Polish, not British’.

He also suggested examination of statistics on rape would reveal a racial bias among attackers, and in another message declared: ‘Enoch Powell was right’.

A Ukip spokesman said: ‘We are deeply shocked that Mr Lampitt has expressed such repellent views.

 
The UK Independence Party political broadcast
 

 
‘His membership of the party has been suspended immediately pending a full disciplinary process.’

However, it was not clear whether Mr Lampitt can be removed from the party’s list of council candidates in Merton, because nominations closed yesterday.

The timing of the row is unfortunate for Mr Farage, who has this week rejected claims from some Labour MPs that his party’s latest election billboards on immigration are racist.

Ukip had suggested its candidates would be put through more rigorous checks following a series of controversies over the views of some on race, gay marriage and other issues.

It faces questions about how it failed to check messages posted over several months and available for all to see on Mr Lampitt’s Twitter page.

Last night his account appeared to have been deleted and he could not be reached.

Lib Dem president Tim Farron said: ‘I cannot believe Ukip did not check the comments of this man before they used him in their broadcast.

The row is a blow for Ukip leader Nigel Farage, who spent the day campaigning in Knutsford in Cheshire

The row is a blow for Ukip leader Nigel Farage, who spent the day campaigning in Knutsford in Cheshire

‘His racist views might even make the BNP wince with embarrassment. A week after the French National Front opened their arms to Ukip, with comments like these it’s easy to see why they did.

‘Ukip might wrap themselves in the flag, but these comments are deeply offensive to anyone with decent British values.’

‘We are deeply shocked that Mr Lampitt has expressed such repellent views’

Ukip spokesman

 

Mr Farage promised to eliminate ‘Walter Mittys’ from his candidate list after Ukip defence spokesman Godfrey Bloom – one of his closest allies – quit following outbursts in which he described foreign nations as ‘Bongo Bongo Land’ and women as ‘sluts’.

The Ukip leader said he would ensure only ‘reliable, steady, solid people’ could run for election.

Labour’s Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper described Mr Lampitt’s tweets as nasty and divisive.

She said on Twitter: ‘Appalling tweets from Ukip member chosen to front campaign. Ukip should reflect very carefully on the way they encourage nasty divisive views.’

To view the original article CLICK HERE
This staggeringly unprofessional behaviour from UKIP and the endless repetition of this sort of incompetence and the serial examples of financial profligacy and self serving dishonesty and such events as paying wives and mistresses wityh tax payers money and holding overseas bank accounts to seemingly avoid the taxes of Britain and on and on with candidates and councillors embroilled in racism and internal squabbling it is little wonder the British public have not entrusted UKIP with a role in domestic politics.
Little wonder that after 21 years of such behaviour UKIP still has no MPs and has never even come close to having a UKIP MP and has so very few Councillors yet is seen as an appropriate dustbin of an unsavoury nature for protesters to use as a dustbin to register their opprobrium at the body politic in the politics of the EU which are seen as largely irrelevant in Britain where the electorate realise there is no value in MEPs and where there is a near total lack of any basic concepts of democracy.
It would seem that the more odious the dustbin the more effective it is to show ones contempt at politicians!
UKIP clearly fills that role in EU elections!
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, UKIP Corruption, UKIP COUNCILLORS | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Justin Adams, were he still alive, might disagree with Farage!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/04/2014

Justin Adams, were he still alive, might disagree with Farage!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Justin Adams pilot of Farage’s plane, were he still alive, might disagree with Nigel Farage’s claim “I’m a little bit more aware of others than perhaps in my worst moments I would have been before.”

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

Nigel Farage interview: ‘To do what I’ve done, you have to lack self-awareness’

To view the original article CLICK HERE
If you read this archive of Farage & UKIP’s antics:
UKIP ARCHIVE SKELETON 01There are many reasons why Nigel Farage would not wish to have a full investigation of UKIP corruption and the practices of its leadership and as for a full forensic accounting of how public money has been used for private gain and huge amounts of money have seemingly gone missing would of course be strenuously avoided – no doubt with the intent to both hang onto personal gains and avoid prison!
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Dishonesty, UKIP Sleaze | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

It Is Not For Farage To Decide What Perceived Criminality Is Investigated

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/04/2014

It Is Not For Farage To Decide What Perceived Criminality Is Investigated
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

It Is Not For Nigel Farage or even HIS Party UKIP To Decide What Perceived Criminality Is Investigated and seek to set himself above the law and any need for ethics and accounting for tax payers’ money.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

Nigel Farage changes position on audit of his MEP allowance spending

Ukip leader denies saying he would allow audit after allegations of misuse, claiming it would be wrong for him to be singled out
Ukip leader, Nigel Farage, campaigns in Dudley for votes in the European elections 

Ukip leader, Nigel Farage, campaigns in Dudley for votes in the European elections. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

Nigel Farage has shifted ground on an offer to allow an independent audit of his spending of European parliamentary allowances, denying he ever accepted the suggestion.

In an interview with the Guardian, the Ukip leader instead claims it would be wrong for him to be singled out for a spending audit as it would put him in a different position to every other British MEP.

Farage said it was not the case that a fortnight ago he said he was happy to have his expenses independently audited. He told the Guardian: “I said if every other British MEP wants to, then I would.

“I mean, I am not going to be one out of 73 that is held up as an example of all that is wrong with the European Union. After all, I’ve been saying that myself for years, so this is absolutely ludicrous. If all 73 people want to go on to a new regime then of course I’ll do it, but to be singled out in this way is frankly ridiculous.”

But Farage appeared to say something different when he was questioned on 15 April following allegations in the Times newspaper about the misuse of his allowances.

When asked on BBC Radio 4′s Today programme if spending on his parliamentary allowance was independently audited, Farage replied: “No it is not. It does not need to be. There is no provision within the rules of the parliament for any of this to be audited.”

He was then asked by the interviewer: “Would you be happy for that to happen? To say ‘Yes, I will have this looked at by an independent accountant?’” to which Farage replied: “If that would settle the argument of course I would”.

His new stance was challenged by the Liberal Democrat MEP Chris Davies who said almost all Labour, Liberal Democrat and Conservative MEPs commission professional accountants to audit or certify the spending of their allowances.

The audit published on MEP websites is required by all three political parties and goes beyond what is required by the European parliament.

Davies said Farage should stop changing his position.

“He has variously claimed that his receipts have been lost or that he hasn’t had the time to complete his expenses. He will not account for many tens of thousands of pounds of public money given to him for office expenses over the years.

“Like the overwhelming majority of British MEPs I publish independently audited accounts for my general expenditure allowance spending. I have done this for many years and will continue to do so.”

Jon Ashworth, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, also called for Farage to be open with the public. “Ukip should bring itself into line with the other political parties in the European parliament. It should have its MEPs’ allowances independently audited by a professional.”

When asked by the Guardian whether he could guarantee that every penny had been spent correctly, Farage said: “I can guarantee one thing; that I haven’t done it for personal gain. But how I’ve spent my time and money, and whether I’ve spent it because I’m an MEP, or because I’m Ukip, I would suggest to you is a very grey area.

“It’s a difficult divide. I’ve made no bones about it that I would use the wherewithal provided by the European parliament to go round Britain and campaign against Britain’s membership of the European Union. I think I’m just about within the rules. I think I’ve kept just the right side of the line, albeit pushing right up to it, sure.”

He said the public was not interested in whether he had spent the monthly fixed-rate allowance of £3,850 for MEPs properly.

“I mean, given the abuses for personal gain that have gone on with expenses in Westminster, I don’t think the general public are that interested in whether I’ve strictly observed the rules on what is campaigning and what isn’t. We always knew these criticisms would come at some point, but I have a completely clean conscience. If someone in Brussels wants to martyr me for that then well … well, they won’t, they won’t.”

Davies said MEPs receive an annual allowance of £44,000 which is intended to cover the cost of rents, telephone bills and all expenditure associated with the running of an office. The money is paid into an MEP’s private bank account and the parliament trusts individuals to use it in accordance with the rules. There is no requirement for receipts to be kept, although many British MEPs do so and publish details of their expenditure.

To view the original article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Sleaze | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Farage’s Abuse of Tax Payers’ Money Hugely Damaging to UKIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 24/04/2014

Farage’s Abuse of Tax Payers’ Money Hugely Damaging to UKIP
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Nigel Farage’s Abuse of Tax Payers’ Money Hugely Damaging to UKIP & do NOT forget that the Westminster sleaze & scandal over expenses was in fact over abuse of Allowances or to be more specific ‘Secondary Allowances’ – Yet Farage splits hairs over how his tax payer funded £Millions are invested and abused, in total hypocricy!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

‘I spent EU allowance cash on campaigning against it’

Nigel Farage

Nigel Farage has claimed he spent almost £60,000 in “missing” allowances on campaigning to leave the European Union, in an apparent breach of EU rules.
The Ukip leader has come under pressure after The Times revealedthat he claimed to have spent almost £60,000 on upkeep for a constituency office provided by supporters rent-free. The sum does not include expenditure on office equipment, stationery, staff salaries or phone bills.
Mr Farage has failed to fully explain how he spent the money for more than a week and also faced questions over nearly £300,000 which was paid out of his local branch as unexplained “other costs”. Former party insiders have alleged that he repeatedly blocked or silenced their efforts to inquire into the party’s finances. Ukip responded by publishing on its website a list of journalists from The Times which, it said, had links to the Conservative party.
Mr Farage spent several hours yesterday giving interviews to the media, but declined to speak to this newspaper. Party aides said the paper had not been “even-handed”.
Mr Farage told a Times reporter: “You should be ashamed of yourself.”
Pushed to explain how he could have spent £15,500 a year since 2009 on insurance, utilities and business rates for a small office near Bognor Regis as he had claimed, Mr Farage said: “I would like to abolish the allowances system.” Asked again where the money had gone, he replied: “Campaigning against British membership of the EU.”
To view the original article CLICK HERE
In complete disregard for the promises Nigel farage made on live media (Meridian TV) to get himself elected when he promised he nor anyone in UKIP who was elected would employ family members!
Of course some £30K a year of tax payers’ money goes here:
and even more tax payers’ cash is spent on others in his stable:
FULLER, Annabelle 07
&
LALOUX, Aurelie 01
Perhaps one should note:
FARAGE, Nigel 85 BILLBOARD 01
The Huffington Post takes on the issue with perhaps more humour than The Times as they co-operate with The Police as are The Guardian in aiding Police and HMRC in inquiries!

Nigel Farage Gets Hundreds Of Brits Applying To Be His Assistant

Posted: 23/04/2014 10:43 BST

Hundreds of British workers have come forward to challenge Nigel Farage’s claim that only his German wife is capable of doing the job of being his assistant, an employment agency has said.

The Ukip leader was forced to defend the decision to employ his non-UK spouse at the same time as launching a poster campaign warning that unemployed Europeans were “after” people’s jobs in this country.

He told the BBC that “nobody else could do that job”, earning “a very modest salary for working extremely unsociable hours for me and being available up to seven days a week”.

But a fake advert for a similar role placed by the agency on its website attracted 764 applications in just 12 hours – 649 of them from UK nationals.

Headed “PA Wanted For Top European Politician”, it stipulated that applicants “must be able to work long and some unsociable hours up to seven days a week” and described the pay as “modest”.

It identified the employer as Ukip, which it described as “a Eurosceptic right-wing populist political party in the United Kingdom”.

Rhys Maddock, director of Xpat Jobs, said: “With our knowledge of the UK and European employment market, we just knew that what Farage was saying was not true.

“There are lots of highly-qualified PAs looking for work and many would jump at the chance to work for a politician such as Farage, perhaps seeing it as a stepping stone to a similar role with MPs or ministers.

“They would definitely be willing to put the long hours in, although they may want to change the sleeping arrangements that go with the current post.”

Some applications also came in from Poles, Romanians and Germans interested in the role.

The firm said it would pass on the best 25 CVs to Mr Farage.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..e

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Annabelle FULLER, Aurelie LALOUX;, Kirsten FARAGE, Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Sleaze | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Farage drags UKIP into his gutter of corruption & obfuscation

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 24/04/2014

Farage drags UKIP into his gutter of corruption & obfuscation
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Nigel Farage drags UKIP into his gutter of corruption & obfuscation, in undeniable contempt for his own & UKIP’s promises of transparency and accountability – Mocking UKIP members & tax payers alike.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
that this editorial article is written by seemingly the ex UKIP MEP & current Tory prospective MEP Marta Andreasen somewhat debases the value of the commentary made as if it is she one should remember she is a liar, a fraud, a fantasist and a cheat who was dumped by The EU as a book keeper and subsequently sought to pass herself off as Chief Accountant and a self proclaimed whistleblower counter both all the evidence and also the fact that she lost her Court Case over the matter!
It is unfortunate that the broadly accurate article was not written by someone of repute, integrity and ethics, as in this instance it is no less accurate despite the nature of the reporter!

Farage is making a mockery of EU allowances

Politicians should have receipts for all payments from taxpayers

Marta Andreasen
Published at 12:01AM, April 23 2014
Are parliamentary allowances different from expenses? This is the debate that has been taking place after revelations about how Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader, allegedly misused his office cost allowances and Maria Miller, the former Culture Secretary, over-claimed on her expenses.
I do not think there is a difference. The public will not make a distinction either. Politicians represent the people. Taxpayers pay for their allowances or expenses through taxes. Whether the money is deposited before or after the invoice is raised, or the amount is fixed or not, is irrelevant.
Whenever taxpayers foot the bill, their right to expect that their taxes are used “legally and regularly” — that is, according to the rules — is beyond question. Nor is there a doubt about their right to expect full transparency and accountability from those who represent them.
The European Parliament pays allowances and does not require invoices but it does have rules. An MEP cannot just, as Mr Farage said, “spend it as he sees fit”: the money is not there for champagne nor is it a free credit line or a salary top-up.
Setting aside Mr Farage’s shrill defence that he sees himself as a taxpayer-funded freedom fighter, another much more fundamental issue arises — the conflict of interest of those involved with the EU.
When I was the European Commission chief accountant back in 2002, I came to the conclusion that it is the aim of the EU bureaucracy to keep beneficiaries of EU funding happy — this includes organisations in the member states, MEPs and civil servants — so that they keep supporting “the project”.
I tried to reform the system — to insist that no payments are made without documentation to justify them — but was instead pressured to sign off on accounts and payments known to be wrong. When I did not sign, I was sacked.
The problem for Ukip’s leader is that he has been making his livelihood out of the European Parliament for 15 years. He is now running for another five years. That is why it irks me to hear him talking about himself as anti-establishment. He has, after all, been paid out of the public purse. He has become part of the establishment that he attacks, which is deeply hypocritical.
To view the original editorial artticle CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Marta ANDREASEN MEP, Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Fraud | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: