Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • March 2023
    M T W T F S S
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Archive for the ‘John Ison’ Category

The Media Admits Nikki Sinclaire Opened The Door To The Good Things That BreXit Will Bring …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/01/2019

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
The Media Admits Nikki Sinclaire Opened The Door To The Good Things That BreXit Will Bring …
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail:
Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

The BLOG:
https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

The Main Web Site:
www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

it is easily forgotten that if the independent MEP Nikki Sinclaire had not organised and used her own money to have the British peoples petition Government to hold a full debate in the House of Commons & delivered 225,000 signatures to Parliament – there would have been no IN / OUT Debate relative to the EU.

It is also worth remembering just how duplicitously and dishonestly Nigel Farage campaigned to try to prevent her achieving the 100,000 signatures she needed to force the debate. Just as you will remember Nigel Farage and Ukip did absolutely nothing in Britain to try to stop the new EU Constitution which was signed into EU law as The Lisbon Treaty which Gordon Brown authorised – despite the efforts of the Conservative Party to prevent it!

Many believe that out of spite Nigel Farage colluded with John Ison & Mark Croucher, aided by the corrupt West Midlands Police & CPS, to plant evidence in an effort to frame Nikki Sinclair via the Courts – fortunately the set-up was badly organised and despite Police sitting in Court with the CPS watching the proceedings and influenced by John Ison admitting to his criminal activities in open Court so blatantly that the Judge cautioned him officially Ms. Sinclaire was totally exhonourated of all the lies and allegations brought against her by the Police and approved by the CPS.

Neither the CPS nor West Midland Police had the common courtesy to admit their errors and it would seem they had prepared a case for when she was found guilty aimed at totally bankrupting her!

No damages were forthcoming for the huge stress they had put her under for a number of years with their lies, nor were damages given for her loss of income and loss of her future prospects politically as a result of their dishonesty.

It is also of note that despite having admitten to falsifying evidence and other criminal behaviour in open Court and implicating Nigel Farage the police failed to prosecute either of them and made the palpably false claim that they did not have evidence of the crimes!

Clearly neither the Police nor the CPS can be trusted and are thus unfit for purpose and can not be believed in providing evidence in Court!

Let us therefore remember the price Nikki Sinclaire paid, on our behalf, to ensure BreXit happened.

These are ‘the good things that will happen if no-deal Brexit happens’

Adam Smith
Tuesday 29 Jan 2019 3:36 pm

No-deal Brexit is usually described with words like ‘chaos’, ‘crashing out’ and ‘shortages’ but there are a lot of people who believe it will be great for Britain.

So what are the benefits of a hard-Brexit?
Well number one on anyone’s list has to be £39 billion which is the amount of cash the UK has agreed to pay the EU in the Withdrawal Deal.

to delay 01

A leave supporter takes part in a demonstration near the Parliament in London, Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2019.

With Britain’s House of Commons bitterly divided on the way forward for Britain’s departure from the European Union, lawmakers representing various factions are vying to have their say in the Brexit process after they overwhelmingly rejected the government’s divorce agreement two weeks ago.

LEAVE CAMPAIGNERS 01.jpg

(AP Photo/Matt Dunham) For some Brexiteers no-deal is what they voted for (Picture: AP)

Instead of sending the cash to Brussels the UK Government could pay around a third of the annual NHS England budget, or even buy thousands of busses plastered with snappy promises. Or with all that unexpected cash sloshing around in the UK’s current account, all 62 million of us in the country could be given a one off cash payment of £628.

If there is no backstop, customs union or other type of deal then as from March 30 the UK can make its own rules up for the first time since 1970.

This is what no-deal fans believe is the most exiting part of leaving the EU. TOPSHOT – Protesters hold up placards and Union flags as they attend a pro-Brexit demonstration promoted by UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) in central London on December 9, 2018, as the crucial vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons looms. – Prime Minister Theresa May appears likely to lose a historic vote on the Brexit deal she has struck with EU leaders in a crucial parliament vote on Tuesday.

Defeat in the House of Commons is almost certain to lead to either a no-confidence vote from the opposition or a leadership challenge from within her own Conservative Party.

Former UKIP and independent MEP Nikki Sinclaire, whose petition helped force a parliamentary debate about a referendum, told Metro.co.uk: ‘No deal will return parliamentary sovereignty immediately and thus allow the UK to enter into negotiations with the EU on an equal basis and we would be more likely to get a better deal. ‘First and foremost it will allow us to trade with the rest of the world unhindered.

We will be free to enter into free trade agreements with whom we like.’ She added: ‘The UK would reclaim its seat at the World Trade Organisation and would be able to play its full part. We would once again be an independent member of the G7 without oversight of the EU.

sinclaire, nikki 02

Former UKIP MEP Nikki Sinclaire leaves Birmingham Crown Court after a pre-trial review of her case where she is accused of money laundering in relation to travel expenses and misconduct in a public office.

Former MEP Nikki Sinclaire believes Brexit will be brilliant for Britain (Picture: PA) ‘Our aid to third world countries could be more targeted. The UK is the second largest donor of foreign aid in the world.

However, the best aid would be able to buy these countries goods therefore able to help these countries trade themselves out of poverty.

‘And another great thing about a no-deal Brexit is that we will never have to see or hear Nigel Farage again!’

Animals lovers are excited about a no-deal Brexit and have already called for the UK to ban the ‘cruel transport of live cattle’ which under EU laws is allowed.

cow 01 transport 01

A cow looks out from a transport truck after being sold at the livestock market by auctioneers Greenslade Taylor Hunt at Sedgemoor market in Bridgewater, U.K., on Saturday, July 27, 2013.

Farm income in the U.K., the European Union’s third-biggest wheat grower, fell 14 percent in 2012 as wet weather reduced harvests and costs climbed, the government said.

Live cattle across borders could be stopped immediately after a no-deal Brexit

The RSPCA’s David Bowles said: ‘The European parliament’s environment, petitions, agriculture and transport committees repeated that member states do not properly comply with or enforce the necessary animal welfare protections and that it is difficult to meet the welfare needs of animals during long-distance transport. ‘These calls for reduced journey times, better animal welfare provisions and much stricter enforcement by member states were also voted through by the Environment Committee.

‘However, the EU Commission has always ignored these calls so we need the governments in the UK to take advantage of Brexit and bring an immediate end to these journeys and this suffering.’ epa07226100

davis, david mp 05

Former Brexit Secretary, David Davis speaks on a mobile telephone as he passes the British Houses of Parliament in central London, Britain, 12 December 2018. British Prime Minister Theresa May will face a challenge to her leadership on 12 December 2018 after 48 letters calling for a contest were delivered to the Chariman of the 1922 Committee. May will find out her future after Conservative Members of Parliament vote between 18:00 GMT and 20:00 GMT later in the evening.

Arch Brexiteer David Davis believes the pound will drop after a no-deal Brexit and ‘that would not be a bad thing’.

He said: ‘The first thing that will happen is it will go about five, ten points down further from the 15 it already is. ‘So, we’ll end up 20 or 25 below what it was before the referendum. That’s not a bad thing. The pound’s always been too high from the point of view of industry because of the effect of the City. ‘Our competitive position with vis-a-vis Europe would be dramatically better even if there are tariffs.’

Chairman of Wetherspoons pub chain, Tim Martin is seen during an interview in London on June 14, 2016. At popular British pub chain Wetherspoon, the EU referendum debate is hard to avoid — it’s in the magazine given out to customers, on the company website and even on special anti-EU beer mats.

Tim Martin is hoping for a no-deal Brexit (Picture: AFP)

martin, tim 01

Wetherspoons boss Tim Martin also believes a no-deal Brexit will help the UK.

He said: ‘We can eliminate tariffs on thousands of products, many of which aren’t made in the UK, like rice, bananas, oranges, New Zealand wine – 12,000 products, and that will make people in the country better off.’

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337

Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.

Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<

&

>Side Bars<

&

The Top Bar >PAGES<

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

 

Please Be Sure To

.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in EU, EUkip, GL-W, GLW, Greg Lance - Watkins, Greg_L-W., John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Nigel FARAGE, Nikki SINCLAIRE, Police Corruption, UKIP, West Midlands Police | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

… Endemic Corruption in West Midlands Police …

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 16/05/2017

Do Visit Our New Website @

www.InfoWebSite.UK

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,

>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
Also: The Top Bar >PAGES<

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

… Endemic Corruption in West Midlands Police …
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~000a ukip-025 count.png~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

when you consider the High Court’s comments in the case below, perhaps we can understand why the case brought against Nikki Sinclaire was so utterly amateur and corrupt, it does seem as if there is endemic and institutionalised corruption in The West Midlands Policeforce and all too likely when you consider the murtder of Charles de Menenez and the rise of Cressida Dick who was in charge of that murder, and the clearly corrupt case against Jasna Badzak, and the dishonesty of Gerard Batten when he used the police to try to bqankrupt me with his lies – it seems it isn’t just The West Midlands Police!

Even earlier than these cases you would be astonished at not only howmuch evidence we had to supply to OLAF and The Bedfordshire Police before they finally condescended to charge the Ukip MEP Tom Wise and Lindsey Jenkins with embezzelling tax payers’ money from the EU purse.

Tom Wise had even paid his solicitor, from the stolen money in his account, to fund trying to use the law to silence me and if possible bankrupt me to prevent me continuing to expose the truth. Nigel Farage never was prosecuted for the stolen money he received from Tom Wise and also as Tom Wise finally admitted his part in the crime the charges against Lindsey Jenkins were not proceded with.

Despite having worked with Daniel Foggo and exposed the crime in the National Press the police took a very long time to act and it was only because I would not drop the matter that Bedford Police finally brought charges that led to Tom Wise being sentenced to 2 years in prison!

It does look all too much as if Ukip, the CPS and the police collude in corruption!

Let us not forget that in giving evidence against

Nikki Sinclaire, who organised, obtained and presented the peoples’ petition which obtained the IN/OUT EU Referendum to restore the fundamental human right of selfdetermination to the British peoples,

Ukip’s lakey John Ison admitted he not only fabricated evidence, but also stole from Sinclaire and was colluding with Nigel Farage in setting her up!

Perhaps even at this late date the West Midlands Police and the CPS, whose deputy director sat in on much of the case and seemed to have colluded in the efforts to stitch Sinclaire up, could show some integrity and explain why they failed to appologise to Sinclaire, when she won her case and they resoundingly lost on all counts, and also why they failed to prosecute John Ison and those with whom he colluded – minded that the Judge in the case cautioned John Ison as he was incriminating himself in open Court!

Consider not just how corrupt West Midlands Police have been shown to be in the case below but also what a foul mouthed bunch of low lifes they have shown themselves to be. Also this would seem to be endemic over many years for was it not the same force who fabricated evidence some years ago against ‘The Birmingham Six’ a case they never solved!

Consider also the lies and fabrications by the police, to try to dishonestly cover up corruption and incompetence, in the Hillsborough case. So we can go on: Consider the murder of the newspaper seller brutally attacked and killed on camera by a Metropolitan Police lout.

Consider these cases before you trust the police again, as it seems all too common!

You should also, when you have read this article below then read CLICK HERE

This is just the latest well documented case:

West Midlands police unit accused of perjury and falsifying evidence

Counter-terror unit members described as ‘criminals who fabricate evidence’ in Old Bailey trial of terror suspects

Three suspects on trial
Three of the suspects on trial at the Old Bailey: Mohibur Rahman, Khobaib Hussain and Naweed Ali. Tahir Aziz (not pictured) is also on trial. Composite: Pa/Rex

A West Midlands police counter-terrorism unit has been accused in court of perjury, falsifying notebooks and hiding text messages related to the trial of a group of terror suspects who called themselves the “Three Musketeers”.

Simon Hussey, a senior officer in West Midlands police’s special projects team, began giving evidence at the Old Bailey trial of four men from the Midlands accused of plotting terror attacks in late April but his cross-examination was interrupted, and the personal and work phones of several officers involved in the case were seized by the police shortly afterwards.

Defence barrister Stephen Kamlish QC said the texts and call records exposed the unit as “criminals who fabricate evidence, who ensure that documents go to courts that aren’t true accounts” and that Hussey and his team had repeatedly discussed their evidence with one another during the trial, despite being under orders from the judge, Mr Justice Globe, not to discuss the case.

Giving evidence in April, Hussey told the judge he had no communication during the trial with “Vincent”, an undercover officer who posed as the boss of a fake courier company set up to gather intelligence on two of the defendants. Central to the defence case is the allegation that Vincent planted a bag containing a pipe-bomb, an air pistol and other items under the driver’s seat of the car of Naweed Ali, one of the defendants, where it was discovered by the security services and triggered a major security alert.

But the messages and phone logs revealed repeated contact between Vincent and Hussey, including a seven-minute phone call from Vincent immediately after he finished giving evidence on his first day. Hussey said he could not remember what they had discussed. They also travelled in a group from Birmingham to London during the trial and stayed in the same hotel until they were advised not to by the prosecution’s barristers.

“Yes we met, but the principle is we don’t discuss the case,” he said.

“That was a clear and blatant lie,” Kamlish responded.

In the runup to the trial, the officers met at Hilton Park service station on the M6 to revisit their witness statements. Kamlish said a service station was chosen to avoid being spotted. “This is your regular clandestine criminal meeting place, isn’t it, so that other people won’t see you there,” he said.

Hussey denied this. “The location was geographically suitable for them to meet,” he said. “I believe that the statements were sent for Andy and Hajji [a third undercover officer] so that they could refresh their memories prior to attending the court to give evidence so they could individually prepare for the case.”

Kamlish claimed Vincent had rewritten his notebook by hand after the four men were arrested to include references to seeing defendants with the bag in which the pipe-bomb and air pistol were found. This was a “very big lie at the heart of the case”, he said.

The week after the arrests, Hussey texted Vincent: “We have agreed with cookie [a senior officer] that you will write your pocket book for Pesage [the name of the operation], not type, hope that helps.” Kamlish said this revealed Vincent falsifying his notes.

Hussey denied this: “Prior to that text to Vincent there had been discussions with Vincent as to who should complete a typed copy of his written pocketbook. It is generally the case that operatives produce a typed copy of their written pocketbook … I said I would ask [another officer] who would produce the typed copy and he said his team would do that. So that text to Vincent tells him we’ve agreed that,” he said.

The text messages revealed a tight-knit group of officers: Vincent texted Hussey that he was preparing to give an “Oscar performance” on the witness stand, adding: “I won’t let you down … I would die first .”

Another undercover officer, referred to in court as Andy, retired shortly after the operation ended. Vincent texted him: “So you wanker … U leave me with a load of fucking wet wiped nob heads who don’t know how to put a job together wipe arses or cover tracks … Wanker …. Miss you.”

Hussey told the jury: “We’re close as colleagues, yes.”

The evidence is part of a 10-week trial of Naweed Ali, 29 and Khobaib Hussain, neighbours from Birmingham, and Mohibur Rahman, 32 and Tahir Aziz, 28 of Stoke-on-Trent, on charges of preparing terrorist acts between May and August 2016. All four men deny the charges.

The men were arrested in August 2016 during a major security alert after the bag containing the pipe bomb – which was later found to be non-viable – and the other weapons was found.

The case continues.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Just who will Police The Police in our society,
as they seem to be Out of Control, arrogant & self obsessed

You should also, now you have read this article above then read CLICK HERE

From the Hillsborough Inquest to Plebgate, from the revelations about undercover officers to the shooting of Mark Duggan, the last few years have been as controversial as any in the history of British policing. The government has introduced a range of new measures to try and make the police service more accountable.
These have included the strengthening of the Independent Police Complaints Commission, measures to crack down on officers retiring when under investigation, and a new openness surrounding police disciplinary hearings. But have these new ideas really worked or is there, as some claim, real resistance to accountability?
How effective are attempts to crack down on police misconduct? Mark Gregory reports.


Regards,
Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

www.InfoWebSite.UK

DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<

 

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: @Greg_LW

I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide

eMail: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

https://InfoWebSiteUK.wordpress.com

www.InfoWebSite.UK

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in Arron Banks, BREXIT, Douglas CARSWELL, EUkip; UKIP; Peter Oborne; Daily Mail; EUkip + The BNP; Libertas + The Jury Team;, Hillsborough, John Ison, Nigel FARAGE, Nikki SINCLAIRE, OLAF, Paul Nuttall, SINCLAIRE MEP, UKIP, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Fraud, UKIP LEADERSHIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Nigel Farage & John Ison – Evidence Of Their Collusion In Criminal Activity!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 09/07/2016

Nigel Farage & John Ison – Evidence Of Their Collusion In Criminal Activity!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name! 

.

Nigel Farage & John Ison – Evidence Of Their Collusion In Criminal Activity has been very clearly shown in Court in what seems to be the mallicious and questionable prosecution of Nikki Sinclaire!

000a ukip-025 count.png

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
this statement of opinion has been added to the article:
Nikki Sinclaire COURT CASE Exposes Nigel Farage’s Involvement
For the context of my comment: CLICK HERE

A statement of opinion written and added by myself G.L-W. Sat-09-Jul-2016:

There may well have been a statement from the defence that:

There is no suggestion of any wrong-doing by Mr Farage or any other party official.

However it is clear that at very least John Ison would seem to be in breech of his employment contract and in breech of ‘The Computer Misuse Act’ and Nigel Farage is very clearly colluding with John Ison in criminal activity – thus it would seem clear that Nigel Farage and John Ison are involved together in criminal behaviour!
It also seems very clear that Nigel Farage, John Ison and possibly others conspired together on numerous occassions in criminal activity, including unlawfull entry, and breech of ‘The Data Protection Act’ involving confidential Government information and confidential data, and in breech of ‘The Computer Misuse Act’.
As this information has been in the hands of the Police and the CPS for some years it is hard to understand on what grounds they have persecuted Nikki Sinclaire over so many years when all they seem to have by way of evidence is some 10 receipts that seem to be administrative errors yet they had very clear evidence & proof of criminality, it would seem, involving and undenied by Nigel Farage and John Ison.
It would seem that this entire farago has been to frame Nikki Sinclaire with the collusion of the Police and CPS unless one can readily accept that both the Police and CPS are both incredibly gullible and very stupid!
Nikki Sinclaire has clearly misplaced her trust in John Ison and has been betrayed by him in a criminal manner; Nigel Farage’s mallicious behaviour is seemingly equally as criminal in that he colluded in criminality of a period of time with John Ison. Steve Morson was also clearly informed of the criminal behaviour but in obvious mittigation supplied what seem to be true and honest evidence of the criminality to the Police making it irrefutable that John Ison and Nigel Farage had acted and colluded in criminality together.
End of G.L-W comment added Sat-09-Jul-2016
.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.

Posted in EU, EUkip, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Nigel FARAGE MEP UKIP, Nikkie SINCLAIRE MEP, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/07/2014

This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

 This charging of Nikki Sinclaire Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice when in the context of the €Billions the EU squanders, overpays and loses to fraud particularly relative to 29 months on bail where justice delayed is clearly justice denied!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
This Rather Looks Like A Sad Reflection On British Justice!Hi,

You may find some of the facts below; and there many downloads and screen captures which I have supporting the opinions below; of interest IF you value campaigning for British Justice, responsible & competent police and cleaning-up Ukip to make it fit for purpose!

http://juniusonukip.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/nigel-farages-useful-idiot-john-ison.html

http://ukip-vs-eukip.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/0323-ukip-official-implicated-in-theft.html

http://markcroucher.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/07-mar-2011-ukip-john-ison-mark.html

http://markcroucher.blogspot.co.uk/

https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/category/john-ison/

Croucher/ Ison blog : http://allaboutukip.blogspot.co.uk/2010/12/ms-sinclaire-and-how-she-dare-not-sit.html

On the, at the time, UKip controlled BDF:

It is believed that John Ison used to post occasionally as “Paul Beech”, which is BP backwards – Bob Pacific on blog also. It was removed (changed to Dave Briggs!) I hear this was done after it was shown to a UKIP MEP in Sept 2010!

“The Common Man” (Oh so Very common!) was MC backwards – Mark Croucher. This was verified for me by a UKIP Brussels insider (Croucher admitted it) at the time.

Mjolnir post on the subject was removed by BDF Moderators!

I can’t find an internet archive of Skeptyk’s BDF entry on the subject or his sordid and dishonest blog, and my source of screenshots have gone missing! It was December 2010, and posted Gregg Beeman’s salary details, but I doubt it was Ison as he was driving to the Alps about that time, so my guess is Croucher.

The information in the downloads was seemingly obtained in a burglary of Nikki Sinclaire’s office by John Ison and I hold a copy of the eMail he sent, containing copies of the material he obtained, some dozens of scans, obtained either by burglary or at very least dishonestly, supplied to the duplicitous and dishonest Mark Croucher – who worked as Nigel Farage’s sewer rat seeking out any material that could be used by Farage and his cronies to manipulate and control people – Notably it was Nigel Farage’s son who commented to Roger Knapman that he was the only person on whom his father did not have a (black) file!

The so called evidence against Nikki Sinclaire would seem to have been obtained by theft including burglary also recordings of phone calls recorded by John Ison and edited by Mark Croucher is also available – whether the police know that the evidence was stolen and the recordings edited I know not! However after almost 30 months on bail it is clear the police have had to drop a number of their original claims against Sinclaire & the 3 members of her staff originally bailed, as they obviously have failed to stand them up even when aided by the dishonest and self serving John Ison or anyone who worked for Farage!

There is absolutely no doubt that any errors of claiming by Nikki Sinclaire (or more likely her staff and most probably deliberate claims inserted into her accounts by third party efforts to damage her) do NOT justify the prolonged period of bail used to smear her name on the grounds of ‘Justice delayed is justice denied’!

The standards of behaviour by the police and others in these allegations give one every concern for the calibre of justice that can be expected and even a guilty verdict would not seem justice in the long run!

Clearly Justice should be seen to be done and much of the behaviour of those involved in the accusations and allegations, not to mention gathering of information and the vile gutter commentaries of a personal nature against Nikki Sinclaire by many of the low lifes associated with Ukip that this shoddy police activity has caused is a matter not of dignity or competence on the part of the police or Ukip and its associates but a slur on both the body politic and the tenets of Justice in these United Kingdoms.

It has been suggested by a retired police Acting Chief Supt. of 30 years distinguished service that:

‘….no interview / charges presented face-face + hand delivered summons (charges) (after this period on bail+ investigation) = possible’ “strong grounds for malicious prosecution charge”.

Misconduct in Public Office does carry a maximum life sentence and is presented under common law, not statute.

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/misconduct_in_public_office/#a015

An easy “catch all” – but it has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt!

May I also draw your attention to:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news…etty-cash.html

ALSO the fact that despite his many lies and efforts to deny his crimes and seek to claim they were invented by myself Derek Clark UKIP MEP was found guilty by OLAF of extensive false claims of EU expenses and was merely ordered to repay somewhere between £50K & £100,000 and seemingly no further action was taken.

In the case of Stuart Agnew MEP UKIP no action was seemingly taken to recoup the numerous £1,000s he falsely claimed as expenses as he admitted on camera to The Sunday Times nor against David Bannerman MEP UKIP (now a Tory MEP!) similarly implicated and neither have cleared their name!

Similarly UKIP leader & MEP Nigel Farage and a previous MEP leader of UKIP Jeffrey Titford were ordered to repay monies they had falsely claimed in expenses!

It is also worthy of note that Nigel Farage has also been accused of dishonest accounting having failed to declare donations to UKIP of over £200,000 and there is also still the issue of what happened to what may have been as much as £1M collected through the Ashford ‘scheme’ which he described as ‘UKIP’s best ever money maker’, however the party chairman, David Bannerman spoke on a point of orderr in reasponse to Richard Suchorzewski at a public meeting in Derbyshire, conceding that less than 15% of the money raised was ever presented to UKIP!

There was it seemed extensive money laundering in that large sums of money were processed through credit card donations which were processed through the credit card machine of Graham Booth UKIP MEP’s Hotel in Torquay!

Similarly there were many £1,000s collected in buckets and if accounted at all only loosely, as the outcome of the Court case brought against UKip by The Electoral Commission, which UKip lost, though UKip turned the issue to advantage seeking to raise the money and costs by bucket collections at a series of public events and by seeking donations. Contrary to claims the donation made by Alan Bown was clearly a breech of the rules as Alan Bown had removed himself from the electoral register as, I understand a part of his divorce proceedings when he left his wife and was co-habiting with one of his betting shop manageresses. Thus the donation was not legal!

A situation bearing many similarities to the donation UKip received some years previously when they accepted a sizeable donation from the owner of a UK football club who was not on the electoral register. UKip, without complaint, refunded the money that had been an unlawfull donation and arrangements were made by thwe donor to have it re-donated in a legal manner (in that case I believe it was by his wife who was on the electoral register) – Just as could have been done relative to Alan Bown’s donation.

Despite claims by dishonest or ill informed UKip members this was not a case of ElCom picking on UKip relative to the large donation made by an individual, subsequently found to be criminal, made to the Lib.Dims. as in that case they had carried out due diligence, even going so far as to contact ElCom for a ruling on the matter before utilising the money. I understand at the time of rec eipt of the money the individual was on the electoral register and neither the Lib.Dims. nor ElCom could have had any idea he was subsequerntly to be found guilty of criminality!

I was reliably informed, at the time of the start of this sorry debacle, that as soon as the tampering with her accounts took place and she was aware of it she immediately contacted the EU Payments Office and provided all the details she could and whether the EU Payments Office arranged repayment or merely wrote it off as being a paltry amount relative to the normal level of squandering of tax payer’s money that is endemic in the undemocratic and corrupt EU, I know not.

On these few comments alone and the links given it becomes all too apparently clear, in my opinion, that this is little short of malicious prosecution, seemingly for political gain or pure malice, of some sort, of individuals or groups of individuals and that the lack of ethical behaviour in extending the bail period from Feb-2012 (after Nikki Sinclaire herself had made public, and I believe had reported this to the police, she had reason to believe her accounts had been maliciously tampered with by a member of staff she believed had possibly made false claims and stolen from her) until this week.

Some 29 months on bail, with no further questioning and apparently no details of the police claims supplied, is little short of harassment and could justifiably be claimed as having ensured she was not re-elected as an MEP and is thus currently unemployed, technically, with a case pending which ensures she will be unable to get responsible employment until justice has been seen to be done and her name cleared – presumably with a healthy level of compensation!

Particularly as it is clearly shown and provable, in her accounts, that Nikki Sinclaire injected a sum in excess of £120,000 of her own money from salary and other personal sources also used a large sum of fully audited money, raised through donations, to fund her work and responsibilities, as she believed them to be (viz: obtaining 220,000 signatures to her petition to HM Government which was the direct and sole cause of David Cameron being forced to hold a debate of the House of Commons relative to Britain’s membership of the EU and thus the undertaking of an IN/OUT referendum, which he clearly led thwe public to believe would be binding).

It is bizarre to believe that an individual who donated a sum well in excess of £100K would then bother with some penny ante sum (by the standards of fraud in the EU by MEPs) – had she wished to gain more income a few £1.000 on mistakenly claimed travel expenses would be dwarfed by her net loss of personal monies through her donations. Even were the police able to engineer a conviction I do not believe Justice would be seen to be done and it is my opinion the entire matter is seeking to ‘get egg off the face of The police’ for having firstly believed the miscreants who would seem to have dishonestly and deliberately ‘set her up’ and for secondly having so tardily acted to bring the matter to Court even if they believe they have a case.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in British Justice, Derek CLARK, EU, EU Corruption, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Mark CROUCHER, Nikki SINCLAIRE, Stuart AGNEW, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

#0761* – A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/03/2012

#0761* – A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

.Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.
A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

As published on http://john-ison.blogspot.com earlier this morning!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

 A Summary of some aspects of the John ISON farce!

Hi,

it is interesting to note the obvious disgust at John Ison’s behaviour and revulsion at the unprofessional behaviour of UKIP leadership in their anti homosexual and vindictive treatment of Nikki Sinclaire, on a UKIP controlled Forum!

It is all but impossible for UKIP to claim it is not anti homosexual and now especially with the addition of the supporter of Tom Wise!

Roger Helmer defedtee from the Tories because he could not get his own way when he stepped down as an MEP, he who set out to try to have the deffinition of where his house was, in order to try to claim even more expenses as an MEP!

Roger Helmer recently stated his opinion that homosexuality was a treatable mental illness – surely the world left that view behind in the 1960s, when we campaigned for the decriminalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults. I should imagine The Tories are glad to see the back of this idiotic man with his arcane views and his plastic EUroScepticism as he milks the system for all it is worth TO HIM!

  1. Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Fonzarelli View Post
    Depending on which side of the Miss Sinclaire/Mr Ison ‘conflict’ one finds oneself on, one could feel that the other is only interested in smearing them.

    One could, or one could try to think beyond the purely superficial.

    In January 2010, UKIP’s NEC unwisely allowed itself to be dragged into what was basically a personal spat between two MEPs, Sinclaire and Farage.

    The correct course would have been to tell Nigel Farage that the NEC had no constitutional power to compel MEPs to join a particular group (which it hadn’t), and that any complaint about Nikki Sinclaire leaving the EFD should be submitted through the party’s disciplinary channel. That would have forced Farage to demonstrate exactly how Sinclaire had breached UKIP’s rules (if she had), provided an opportunity for mediation, and ensured that if necessary the matter be decided in the proper way by the discipline committee (from which NEC members are barred).

    Instead of which, the chairman of the NEC foolishly issued a statement Statement from UKIP chairman – UK Independence Party on behalf of the committee, announcing that Sinclaire would not be permitted to stand for UKIP at future elections on the grounds of her having left the EP group, and having “failed to declare other relevant issues to the interview panel when she was selected as a UKIP candidate” (which she denied). If Sinclaire chose to challenge this legally, as past experience suggested she might, any breach of normal disciplinary procedure or evidence of her having been treated less favourably than others in similar situations, would obviously disadvantage UKIP hugely.

    Within a matter of months, first Mike Nattrass then Trevor Colman followed her out of the EFD, yet no action was taken against them by the NEC and, unlike Sinclaire, both are still accepted as UKIP MEPs and listed as such on the party website.

    Now we see that the article linked by Alex McKee at #9 raises the possibility that the second of the accusations levelled at Sinclaire – that of failing to declare relevant issues to a candidate selection panel – may also have applied to John Ison.

    Ison stood as UKIP candidate in Redditch in 2005 and Solihull in 2010, being bound by the party constitution on both occasions to make “a written application and shall make full disclosure of any fact, political or personal, that may have a bearing on their suitability for selection as a candidate”. In 2010 the application form stated: “I am not aware of any circumstances from my past that might cause embarrassment to the party were it to be revealed”.

    Did Ison fail to declare that he had been banned by court order from seeing his children, and lie by signing the form anyway? If so, now that the story is known through circulation on the internet, the NEC will be guilty of victimizing Nikki Sinclaire if it doesn’t ban Ison from standing in all future elections just as it has banned her.

    If he did declare it and was allowed to stand despite this, the party and all its future candidates will be at risk from resulting bad publicity, but why would a party that goes to the length of demanding CRB checks on its candidates precisely in order to screen out potential problems, regard a court order protecting five-year-olds from their own father as not having a bearing on his suitability as a candidate?

    Reply With Quote
  2. #23

    Senior Member Steve Morson's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wonderful Worcestershire
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by Barboo View Post
    One could, or one could try to think beyond the purely superficial…..

    And indeed you do, Barboo. A quite stunning post, extraordinarily well-informed and astute.

    The questions it raises, which I asked myself on being informed of the archive article on the court case only recently, are for members of the party. Which is why I did not ask them publicly.

    What a mess.

    Steve
  3. #24

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Barboo View Post
    Did Ison fail to declare that he had been banned by court order from seeing his children, and lie by signing the form anyway?

    I’ve no idea what Ison has or has not declared but he was pre-UKIP a notable public campaigner for fathers rights. How have you come to the apparent conclusion that his own circumstances were not already in the public domain?

    Reply With Quote
  4. #26

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Morson View Post
    And indeed you do, Barboo. A quite stunning post, extraordinarily well-informed and astute.

    Thank you, Steve!


  5. #27

    Trusted Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by Independent UKIP View Post
    I’ve no idea what Ison has or has not declared but he was pre-UKIP a notable public campaigner for fathers rights. How have you come to the apparent conclusion that his own circumstances were not already in the public domain?

    I haven’t come to any conclusion on the matter and that is not the point. UKIP’s constitution does not put responsibility onto candidate selection panels for acquainting themselves with applicants’ personal circumstances from what is in the public domain. It states categorically that candidates shall make full disclosure.

    If John Ison did not do so then natural justice demands that he should be treated the same as Nikki Sinclaire in what the NEC claims was a similar circumstance (failure to disclose, which she denies), and banned as she was from standing in future elections. Not to ban Ison would be a second example of Sinclaire being treated more harshly than others, the first being that action was taken against her for leaving the EFD but not against Nattrass and Colman.

  6. #28

    Uber Member Niall Warry's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somerset
    Posts
    7,406

    It is very simple really Nigel doesn’t concern himself with rule books, as I’ve had experience of, by his selfish standards there is one rule for him and his mates and another for his foes.

You may be interested to note YET AGAIN that the false accusation of failure to disclose made against Nikki Sinclaire was an unprofessional pack of lies from UKIP Leadership and pure discrimination.

Nikki Sinclaire was madse technically bankrupt (ie based on the claim of one man who served p0apers at an address at which she clearly did not live as she washelping UKIP set up their head office in Birmingham!).

The details were IMMEDIATELY reported by Nikki Sinclaire to The Returning Officer in the election, in which she stood. She also informed Michael Zucherman The UKIP Part Secretary at the time.

I also published the full details at the time as they were a matter of public record, as is the fact that John Ison was not found guilty in a Court Case of assault on his wife who left him for another woman but WAS deemed unfit to have access to his children, presumably his volatile temper or underhand behaviour were deemed a risk to children.


As to bankruptcy being ostensibly a cause of the UKIP Leadership’s unprofessional and partisan behaviour the Guilty Judgement against Nigel Farage, Godfrey Bloom and UKIP inCourt would seem to indicate otherwise as would the official caution from the EU Parliament aganst Godfrey Bloom for his anti homosexual bullying.


It is interesting to note that John Ison’s vindictive and malicious behaviour against Nikki Sinclaire and his various thefts and seeming ‘construction’ of so called evidence, in collusion with others (including the proven corrupt Christopher Gill see: CLICK HERE) may all be a vindictive attack based on John Ison’s seemingly very ‘challenged’ sexuality and unhappy marriage!


Nikki Sinclaire’s treatment at the hands of UKIP’s partyisan and unprofessional leadership can not be on the grounds of her historic bankruptcy reported at the time, despite the clamourings of Nigel Farage’s sewer rat Mark Croucher who we KNOW colluded in what seems clearly to be efforts to set Nikki Sinclaire up to curry favour with Nigel Farage!


I say it can not be based on the irrefutable fact that Niel Hamilton the formerly disgraced Tory MP was courted by Farage and joined UKIP some 5 years ago and is now, we understand, promised a leading seat as a contender for election to public office once more and as is also a matter of record he was bankrupt and was recently boasting of it on national TV.


Perhaps Niall Warry was correct that in the corrupt world of UKIP:
It is very simple really Nigel doesn’t concern himself with rule books, as I’ve had experience of, by his selfish standards there is one rule for him and his mates and another for his foes.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com  
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<  
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
eneral Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World WideofOUR-ENEMY-WITHIN&To Leave-The-EU 

. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World WideofOUR-ENEMY-WITHIN&To Leave-The-EU  
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Barboo, Ho, John Ison, John ISON Thefts, Niall WARRY, Nikki SINCLAIRE MEP, osexual, Roger Helmer, UKIP anti Homosexual, UKIP Bullying, UKIP Leadership Corruption | 1 Comment »

#0757* – The Idiotic allegations of John ISON in Perspective!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 24/02/2012

#0757* – The Idiotic allegations of John ISON in Perspective!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&


Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.
The Idiotic allegations of John ISON in Perspective!

They are no more credible with the encouragement of UKIP’s corrupt Leadership & clearly self seekingly malicious!

See also The John Ison blog CLICK HERE!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

its interesting to note that in keeping with the serial dishonesty and indubitable corruption in UKIP where we note Nigel Farage was ordered by OLAF to repay a substantial amount of money to the public purse, so also did Jeffrey Titford – just as Derek Clark was ordered to repay somewhere between £30,000 & £100,000 he had fraudulently obtained and spent.

Despite PROMISING the electorate that NO UKIP ELECTED OFFICER would employ members of their family – We then see that not only was Farage clearly fiddling his expenses but openly admitted he had made a couple of £Millions over his actual expenses – yet there is no record declared of him EVER making a substantial donation to The UKIP cause – it seems that it is just a self enrichment scam for him used to fund his extravagant drinking and sex life!

The media also brought it to the attention that he was paying his wife for her personal services £30,000 a year.

Then of course there is Marta Andreasen who lied about her CV, lied about being a whistle blower and was in breech of UKIP electoral rules when she conned her way onto the UKIP list as a result of playing to Nigel Farage’s ego!

Then of course there were the lies of Mick McGough to dupe his fellow UKIP members to fraudulently obtain a place on their MEP hopefuls and the NEC.

Of course there was the admission of fraud by Stuart Agnew on his and David Bannerman’s behalf and the open efforts to defraud the electorate by fraudulent breaking electoral law and with Lord Pearson laundering money in donations.

This is just the tip of the corruption in UKIP – little wonder that they have achieved so very little towards the aim to Leave-The-EU and are seen increasingly as a joke in the EU parliament. They are clearly unfit for purpose even amongst the corrupt MEPs and unelected beauraucrats of the EU.

There are many other instances running to £Millions – the well publicised fiddles surrounding the Ashford scams or the £1/4M that was spiritted out of Farage’s office account as other expenses, or the various off shore bank accounts etc. etc.

Now we have the scum of UKIP crowing with glee that they have villified Nikki Sinclaire as a result of the CLAIMS of her ex employee who she once permitted to remain on staff after he had directly stolen money and when he saw a way to harm his benefactor and employer would seem to have fraudullently purchased travel tickets to negate her legitimate travel claims – it was of course from a position of trust that he reported the purchase of travel for a relatively small amount of money.

Let us not forget it was part of John Ison’s job to manage Sinclaire’s travel claims and buy such tickets as were required I gather!

This looks to be a classic and very distastefull pack of lies by a failed employee who saw an opportunity to cash in and seek preferrment in UKIP by toadying with lies.

Clearly this is my opinion based upon such facts as I do have and the boasts of John Ison which can be proved and his thefts from Sinclaire’s offices.

This seems more premeditated than the thefts by Annabelle Fuller when she stole an MP’s Blackberry and House of Commons pass and when caufght seemingly invented a claim of inappropriate sexual advances by the MP – any who have read her sordid blog with its sexual comment and outpourings of promiscuity, drunken reverrie and foul language – her claims were clearly implausible as were his lies to The Independent & The Daily Mail when she duped Farage into endorsing her foolish comments.

The alegations made against Nikki Sinclaire are clearly a fabrication – when one realises they amount to so little relative to the 10s of £1,000s that her auditted accounts show she donated from her own money to the Leave-The-EU cause.

In fact the claimed allegations are only a fraction of the donations she has given to UKIP!

Alleging deliberate fraud does rather make the accuser look rather stupid when the paltry sum claimed is a fraction of that which Sinclaire has donated – What fraudster acting with ANY criminal intent donates more than they are alleged to have used!

Compare the allegations maliciously made against Nikki Sinclaire with the institutionalised abuse of tax payers’ money by The EU with which MEPs and unelected EU bureaucrats willingly collude as they stuff their pockets:

1) ACP-EU joint parliamentary assembly in Kinshasa, Congo, Nov 2010: £853,360, 50 MEPs for eight days, £17,067 per head
2) ACP-EU joint parliamentary assembly in Tenerife, Spain Jan 2010: £588,404, 64 MEPs for seven days, £9,193 per head.
3) Eurolat parliamentary meeting in Cuenca, Ecuador, Nov 2010: £385,441, 39 MEPs for four days, £9,883 per head.
4) Eurolat, Seville, Spain, May 2010: £201,880, 51 MEPs for three days, £3,958 per head.
5) EU-US transatlantic meeting, Washington, Dec 2010: £170,334, 28 MEPs for three days, £6,083 per head.
6) Inter-parliamentary delegation to Shanghai, China, May 2010: £147,280, 11 MEPs for eight days, £13,388 per head.
7) EU-Chile joint parliamentary committee, Valparaiso, Chile, May 2010: £125,347, nine MEPs for six days, £13,927 per head.
8) Enlarged bureau visit to Shanghai, China, May 2010: £120,292, seven MEPs for eight days, £17,184 per head.
9) EU-Mexico joint parliamentary committee, Mexico, Nov 2010: £107,954, 11 MEPs for six days, £9,814 per head.


10) TAR delegation to Ottawa, Nov 2010: £97,883, nine MEPs for nine days, £10,875 per head.

Obscene isn’t it?

A part of the reason these United Kingdoms should Leave-The-EU at the earliest possible opportunity.

. .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com  
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar<
 Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com  
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com  
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com  
TWITTER: Greg_LW 

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World WideofOUR-ENEMY-WITHIN&To Leave-The-EU  
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Fraud Allegations, John Ison, Nikkie SINCLAIRE MEP | Leave a Comment »

#0432* – a UKIP ROUNDUP In Haste

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 21/04/2011

#0432* – a UKIP ROUNDUP In Haste

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 
.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
a UKIP ROUNDUP In Haste!

I haven’t even read my ‘e’Mails today! But please bear with me as I had my first dose of heavy duty ‘cocktail’ chemotherapy and a wonderfull aray of pills today and I’ve run out of time!

IF you want to follow the details of the treatment over the last 13 years and follow as I beat the obscene disease yet again just scan down the RIGHT SIDEBAR and CLICK ON the Pic. of the ‘WARM HANDS’ being washed!

You might wish to join with filth like Mick McGough who dragged CIB, UKIP, The TFA and others into the gutter he inhabits with his published glee at a supporter of UKIP The CIB and The TFA who has spent many years opposing Britain’s membership of The EU – A sad reflection of what thes organisations making money as they ride on the gravy train consider TRUE BRITISH VALUES!

We note Anthony Butcher hosts McGough’s filth at:
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip/90831-collection-anti-ukip-greg.html  

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

a busy day so please accept the haste.

I received this which may interest you

Date: (REDACTED)
From: (REDACTED)
Subject: UKIP smears
To: johnwest81@hotmail.com

Mr West, A friendly warning. Peter Reeve and others have contacted several members of UKIP about you. They have been advised to contact the radio station where you work with allegations of racism. ‘The worse the better so he loses his job’ were the words used. That they consider this acceptable behaviour disgusts me. They have lost my support forthwith.(REDACTED)

I am aware of the author and have checked the veracity to the best of my ability and it ties in with filth published by another of UKIP’s parasites Skeptyk and also endless childish attacks from the serial liar Mick McGough.

No doubt incresing numbers of UKIP genuine supporters not looking to feed their bank accounts or egos at the expense of their Country will be realising that not only is Mick McGough a proven liar but also willing to sell out his own associates for personal gain and Independent  UKIP and the sad failure Skeptyk who have both, for all their lies and posturing just like Stuart Parr and others been made to look complete idiots and clearly dishonest.

Endlessly these maggots that have sought to exploit the EU and UKIP for personal gain find they are proved liars over and over. Endlessly they claim that my Blog publishes untruths yet in the many 1,000s of postings I have made they have utterly failed to identify a single consequential fact that I have published that is materially untrue.

However as they leap up and down in the gutter the ordure they coat themselves with their unpleasant, dishonest and childish behaviour has shown ever more what odious cowards they are.

As with Mick McGough and Douglas Denny their lies over several years are beneath contempt.

Let us consider THE FACTS provided by the mailing I have published above.

I gather not a single letter of complaint regarding John West’s broadcasts has been recived in the 7 or 8 months he has hosted and also co-hosted two breakfast shows a week at ICR. We then have the proof positive that incitement to defame and lie was published by Mick McGough, Skeptyk, Peter Reeve and others and  a tiny weenie flurry of near identiacal libelous, defamatory and dishonest lies arrive at ICR and when the chppie running the station writes to each complainant not one has the intelligence or morality to write and apologise.

I note Skeptyk also lied about John West requesting the removal of a copyright picture from his blog. Perhaps Skeptyk might care to substantiated this lie as he claims he was written to he can very easily publish John West’s letter.But of course he can’t as John West has never sent such a letter and yet again Skeptyk is proven to be a liar.

I have a feeling that within the month UKIP are likely to realise just how big a mistake they have made in inciting this vile underhand and cowardly attack on John West has been.
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Hi,

here is a new resource for EUroSceptics and EUroRealists at:
 

  This new site was launched on the 20-Apr-2011 and would seem to have much going for it as it is aimed at assisting EUroSceptics, EUroRealists and activists alike – seemingly with a help line.


I wish the site well and hope it lives up to my personal hopes.


On the subject of Resource Sites – do not forget the various links in the Right Sidebar of this blog and many of my other blogs.

Do not forget to take advantage of the LINKS in The TABS at the head of the current blog daily.

I understand a New Resource that may well become of much note and more embarrassment to The EU is scheduled to be launched during this coming weekend – but more of that then!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Hi,

here is another all to typical mailing – this time regarding Mid Suffolk.
 

From: (REDACTED)
To: (REDACTED)
Subject: RE: UKIP Mid Suffolk
Date: (REDACTED).ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P{padding:0px;}.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahom

Dear Sir,

I vote UKIP and was disappointed that their were was no candidate for my area! Conservative, Liberal, Labour and Green Party……UKIP could have used this election, an opportunity missed.

To keep and increase the support of the UKIP possible voters lets hear a bit more on issues in the media by some of the elected members who are not shy or able to put across the views written

Thank You
(REDACTED)

The danger the correspondent faces is that if people are NOT selected by a democratic process unfortunately one ends up with individuals being elected based upon lies and dishonesty and using Conservative oriented and sponsored so called PR agencies like Athena-PR to gain advantage – interestingly a fact that only came to light when this blog published the fact that Nigel Farage employed a professional agency to ensure his election.

You may remember his previous placement as leader was also founded on lies and dishonesty that emmanated from the Party’s own returning officer – who was sacked from the job for his corruption and by the lies of UKIP salaried Press Officers!

UKIP internal elections and selection processes have similar levels of integrity to those of Godfrey Bloom’s favourite baboon!!! CLICK HERE & HERE

It is also valid to ask oneself if it is better to field no candidate rather than make the party look crass by fielding a shy and retiring school girl taking her ‘A’ levels who will not be interviewed nor provide a photograph or statement when seeking office of Mayor of Leicester as is Regine Anderson, on behalf of UKIP CLICK HERE
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
You may also be amused by the posting on and about Anthony Butcher’s Forum and the pond life that regulary post their lies there as enumerated earlier:

Consignment of geriatric shoemenders

As I say, hilarity. Arising from hypocrisy and crass stupidity.

‘Allowing smoking in a pub not a real crime’? Would it be a crime if it wasn’t Nick Hogan? What constitutes a crime in that case, or is it a matter of who commits it?

It’s always worth coming on here for a smile. Anyway, here’s today’s mental exercises for the sagacious law professors, ethicists and elevated equestrians pitching in here(answer ALL questions):

Law: civil and criminal

1) Is entering premises and intentionally stealing documents from a someone a crime? (OK, a hint: section 9 of the Theft Act 1968) (10 points)

2) If a tiny part of the contents of said documents (e.g. a contract) are then posted on a website, is that a criminal or civil offence? Explain your choice. (No more hints – you’ve had one!) (20 points)

3) If person A sends person B a private e-mail, containing a viciously untrue allegation, then promulgates it to all and sundry within an organisation with a view to destroying person B’s reputation by nature of the allegation, what offence has been committed? (20 points)

Ethics

4) Person A sends someone Private Messages in an internet forum, then uses the forum to complain that they have been discussing / publishing the contents of those messages with other people. Person B sends Person A Private Messages, which another party, Person C then hints strongly to B the contents of the messages he sent to A. What kind of character is Person A? (Assume – correctly – that B does NOT disclose the contents of PM’s, e-mails or other discretions.) (25 points)

5) If Person A from Q.4, operates the website mentioned in Q.2, is there a criminality issue / moral conflict? (25 points and a Gold star for the best answer!)

Ends

I won’t enter the discussion of the merits of the Denby / Bloom situations, I think they’re both overblown teacup storms, indicative of deeply sinister, cliquey croneyism and hysterical mischief-making, both as destructive as each other.

For me, I cannot stop thinking about my (fairly lengthy) chat at the leadership hustings last autumn, where I was regaled with stories of planned “professionalisation” of a certain entity. Seems like years ago.

Steve

It is particularly interesting to note that the author of this is a Branch Chairman still and has been a dedicated supporter who has in the past stood, at his own expense, in elections for UKIP yet seemingly Bromsgrove is now only fielding a single paper candidate- One must assume as a resuult of watching the lies and antics of UKIP leadership towards their local UKIP elected MEPs Nikki Sinclaire and Mike Nattrass both of whom have endeavoured to give of their best to the local party and also local issues.

That allegations of theft were made against John Ison and that even the media did not believe him, when he was put up to his malicious betrayal of trust, is now a matter of widespread knowledge, even made fun of on the floor of The EU pretend parliament!

Whether the Police take action against him is a matter for The CPS but it is clear to me that absolutely no credence has been given to the odious little man by either the press, the police or OLAF.


My appologies to Steve Morson for having posted his public domain posting onto this blog without his express permission, but he was either out or not taking phone calls this evening.


Steve Morson knows from past experience I always seek to obtain either the author’s permission or two or more reliable sources for private texts, also where possible I try to contact individuals to ensure they will stand by their claims made in the public domain.
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
You may also in passing care to note that it seems that Nigel Farage has employed yet anothre Conservative who is not opposed to EU membership and withdrawal from The EU but rather CLEARLY STATES that he is in favour of membership of The EU and seeks implausible changes.

No doubt these new staff are to makke it easier for Farage to betray the party and with his sycophants and self seekers like Mick McGough, Stuart Agnew, William Dartmouth, David Bannerman, Marta Andreasen and others seek to dump the principles and values of UKIP in favour of Pan EU Party Allegiances with appeasers rather than act with integrity as withdrawalists.  

Those of course who are not aiming to dump UKIP alltogether and seek new homes in The Conservative Party or center right Spanish Politics!

For more details you may find this LINK of help!
It is interesting to note that UKIP Northern Ireland are seemingly either going native before they even start or making up policy on the hoof CLICK HERE where he conflates CAP & CFP in some confussion and though he talks of withdrawal he has far more to say about changing The EU. Is this also to seek inclusion in a Pan EU Political Group?

Another brief pointer for UKIP having been found Guilty on various counts relative to Nikki Sinclaire and with no sign of UKIP doing anything constructive other than madly stall to try to keep their behaviour out of the media until AFTER the elections – A point Douglas Denny may wish to raise when next he has the courage to challenge Nigel Farage on matters of integrity, probity, transparency and so very much more!


.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62

Posted in CIB, Douglas DENNY, Godfrey BLOOM MEP, Independent UKIP, John Ison, Mick McGOUGH, Nigel FARAGE MEP, Nikki SINCLAIRE MEP, Skeptyk, Steve MORSON, TFA, ThEUnit, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

#0421* – UKIP CHORLEY & MORE SIGNS of LEADERSHIP STUPIDITY!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 16/04/2011

#0421* – UKIP CHORLEY & MORE SIGNS of LEADERSHIP STUPIDITY!
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  
.
UKIP CHORLEY & MORE SIGNS of LEADERSHIP STUPIDITY as ENDORSEMENTS COME IN for Colin DENBY!

It seems Nick Hogan is far from popular and held in contempt by many – not least those who seemingly have problems with him of a commercial nature!

Is UKIP Leadership merely funding Hogan from Party income as the only way they can get publicity?

Clearly UKIP have no one of competence or ability in their Press Office as shown by the dirth of publicity of any gravitas year after year & cheap Publicity Stunts and self serving so called Celebs & minor shock jocks just don’t cut the ice!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

it seems that without competent leadership UKIP just sinks further into the hole its parasites and self serving sycophants of the weak and venal leadership create.

Would that UKIP had managed to find a leader of some competence to capitalise on the undeniable skills as a performer of Nigel Farage who can on a good day put on a bravura performance.

Sadly although UKIP’s message is very much to the fore amongst the public their childish antics, obvious incompetence, lack of professional PR, lack of structure, and obvious lack of a competent Organ Grinder (leader), leaves them with a discordant tune on their organ and a performing monkey – hardly the stuff of front line politics.

When was the last National Press Article treating this bunch of clowns as grown up politicians?

You will remember that at the desperate little attempt to re-launch recently apart from a full on spat between Nigel Farage’s two Party funded doxies nothing of interest happened and fortunately Farage’s women and their nocturnal antics did not make The Press – merely gossip amongst the better informed!

Previously the only publicity from the UKIP autumn conference was for Nikki Sinclaire’s Petition for A Referendum which is imminently due for a new push towards the 100,000 signatures across Britain. The only other publicity was based on a pack of lies from Jon Ison trying to currie favour with the other maggots seeking attention in support of UKIP’s failed leadership.

You may remember that John Ison was reported in The Sunday Times and even there no points of value emerged as it was clear to the Journalist that the story lacked veracity so it was beset with ‘Allegedlies’ bringing UKIP into disrepute to the informed reader.

Dressing up as chickens, draping banners off of motorway bridges, playing with inflatable toys, driving around in WWII scout cars from a museum, standing in an APC on a trailer and pretending it is a tank seems the best UKIP can do to get publicity as it lacks any credibility with the media – well look at their PR staff!!

Now we have this manufactured farce in Chorley that due to lack of competent leadership has merely brought the party into disrepute yet again!

You may wish to read more of the FACTS surrounding UKIP’s incompetence and duplicity in Chorley CLICK HERE

From: REDACTED 
To: REDACTED 
Sent: REDACTED
Subject: Re: Nick Hogan & UKIP

Colin,

I have seen in the paper today that you have withdrawn your nomination for Chorley Candidate, And I am shocked and disturbed that you have been forced into this repast I have know you for a number of years now and have always found you to be forth right and honest.

You have strong opinions which many of your supporters agree with and never once would I have ever classed you as racist.

You have fought for this country and the freedom that it represents.

You have my sincerest support and hope you can use this endorsement in some way to repair the damage that “Nick Hogan” has achieved.

Perhaps the UKIP Party should look more closely at him and his ties to other organisations which hold extreme views.

Also while there at it what about his criminal background as well – I always said all politicians were crooks and this just proves my Point!!

Best wishes
REDACTED

I have redacted the names as I am well aware how vile UKIP can be.

On that note even that has backfired on the maggots like Mick McGough and Skeptyk as I gather their childish attacks on John West to try to lose him his job have yet again brought UKIP into disrepute.

I gather as a result of the publicity John West has been getting from UKIP his listener figures are markedly up and hits on his YouTube publicity clips has markedly increased.

For those who haven’t noticed John West has been working in the broadcast industry for 7 or 8 months with a show of his own and also as a stand in with other presenters. I gather his show is proving very popular and he has been doing little jokey pieces on video to promote the entertainment including some to raise funds for various charities.

After this long on air and as a result of attempts to damage him by UKIP’s low life they even sent eMails to his Radio Station which do make UKIP look quite revolting when they are so clearly orchestrated and similar in their lies – it has been noted by John West’s colleagues that this was sponsored by UKIP!

How can UKIP ever be expected to be taken seriously with this gutter trash acting for it?

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62

Posted in Chorley, Colin DENBY, John Ison, John WEST, Mick McGOUGH, Nick HOGAN, Nikki SINCLAIRE MEP, Skeptyk, YouTube | Leave a Comment »

#0411* – UKIP Branch Ch. SLAMS UKIP CORRUPT BEHAVIOUR

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 10/04/2011

#0411*- UKIP Branch Ch. SLAMS UKIP  CORRUPT BEHAVIOUR
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
A UKIP Branch Chairman & PPC SLAMS UKIP’s  CORRUPT BEHAVIOUR & The Style of its Parasites!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Default Disgusting! Gerard (not) the (only) subject of smear campaign

As sources of amusement go, I find this forum one of the most reliable, and this thread an exemplar.
I view it occasionally, as it often leaves me in despair, and contribute rarely. Anyway, here goes.
Skeptyk by name and nature indeed. Given the world we inhabit Skeppy, I’m rather surprised that a decent cove such as yourself (genuine flattery) should think a smear e-mail against Gerard as ‘non-existent’ (feigned scepticism), but then go on to ask for it’s contents to be PM’d to you as proof, while hiding behind a pseudonym (hypocrisy and irony )

Well it does seem as if he has the measure of that revolting gathering of self serving, self enriching filth! Skeptyk, Independent UKIP, Gothmog (William Shaw), Baron von Lottsov (more stupid than venal!), Gawain Towler, Mark Croucher, KrisH (Kris Henderson), Annabelle Fuller, Bannerman, Agnew, Reeve, Nuttall, Batten, Kris or KS (Kris Seunarine), Andreasen, Bloom and the rest of the low lifes beneath contempt seeking personal gain by the betrayal of principle and patriotism.

There is nothing to be gained in calling someone an “X sockpuppet” if you yourself are a “Y sockpuppet”. IMHO. It was interesting to see the usual coterie of ‘defenders’ doubted the existence of that infamous e-mail header posted on this very forum (4th March), and deleted in extreme haste. If it was fictitious (it wasn’t – it’s on Junius for the curious), why the panic? People on here seem to have their own interpretation of libel laws; another source of hilarity. I doubt that there’s more than a few members here who could actually afford a libel lawyer – for 1 day!
I’ve tired of the forum where the only way some people feel that they can “contribute to discussion” is behind a cloak of anonymity. There is genuinely no explanation for this other than moral cowardice.

Perhaps he overlooks the reasons besides moral cowardice – dishonesty, corruption, stupidity, self enrichment, malice, sycophancy for example!

I have been the victim of an extremely nasty and totally unnecessary smear campaign recently, but of course, as a lowly branch chairman, it is of no consequence to the masses.

There was however an effort to embroil this blog – just as with the unpleasant smear of Gerard Batten – the reason being obvious in that not only do most of the informed in UKIP read this blog with an astonishing degree of regularity but also it is read by several well connected members of the media on a regular basis.

What is most staggering is that there was no conceivable, rational need or purpose for it; what is most puzzling is “why” it was done.

As with most activity in UKIP I believbe that you will find it was in an effort to denigrate others to gain points in the race to get their snout into the trough on the gravy train as a sycophant of Nigel Farage’s.

That and – I suppose – the fact that its source is a member of the party’s disciplinary committee.

If the mutually shared belief is that the individual in question is John Ison perhaps it is worthy of note that it is widely understood that he was stained an almost permanent brown colour in his endeavours at Oldham to gain the colour yet unwilling to make any efforts for UKIP in his own region – It seems to have paid off, as he was seemingly rewarded with a position on UKIP’s risibly styled Disciplinary Committee!

A position allocated without even making formal application I am given to understand.

The choice of smear ‘type’ was also curious; it leaves one to ponder whether some of the more ‘unsavoury’ accusations made against the party have a foundation in truth.

Hence it always proves essential for me and also I understand for those posting on Junius, to check our facts with care – there are no shortage of liars, cheats and duplicitous bufoons on UKIP’s leadership team and amongst their parasites – the maggots feeding on the party they have all but destroyed!

I will yield more by PM for those prepared to reveal their true identity under solemn promise – I will give my WORD – of utter secrecy.
The biggest laugh of all came when the attempt to use Greg Lance-Watkins as the vehicle for the smears, blew up in their face badly – I almost lost control of my bladder .

Amusingly there is so much back biting and jokeying for position in UKIP’s upper echelons that often I will receive ‘inspired’ leaks from both sides trying to gain an advantage. Fortunately to date the level of general stupidity amongst UKIP leadership and the scum gathered around them has made it easy to spot the internal betrayals and attempts to set each other up – thus to date this blog has NEVER been duped into publishing a single solitary error or dishonesty of any significancve – but as many know we do check our facts.

Completely out-of-the-blue, I received a phone call several weeks ago from GL-W, seeking confirmation or denial of 3 stupid slurs, before posting an article attacking me, on his bog (sic).

All a part of ensuring that this blog – whatever name inadequates may childishly call it – ensures it maintains its track record of 100% Truth and accuracy.

When I trashed them, he decided not to post, as ‘…I am a stickler for facts…’ and my threats of legal action (if he went ahead) were treated with snorting derision.

The derision was not a challenge it was that he was being so stupid as to think I might deliberately publish anything dishonest.

Just as I have NEVER published a single solitary article comment or article, posting or eMail in any identity other than my own. Unlike the likes of Skeptyk, Independent UKIP and the like I have nothing to be ashamed of and many will be aware I have offered to attend any meeting to answer cross examination on any and all the facts I have presented on this and my many other blogs and postings.

They (the leak’s ultimate source – it was an e-mail originally sent only to me) ended up with their own dedicated weblog, courtesy of GL-W. With a remarkable level of detail and – more importantly – apparent accuracy, to say nothing of appropriately choice adjectives!

I presume the allusion is to CLICK HERE

I was told that the leak had distributed the contents of this 1-to-1 e-mail to a “…wide list of people…”. Hold on, does that constitute ‘libel’?
This ‘politics’ is a strange business!

Steve MORSON’s Original Article CLICK HERE

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62

Posted in Gerard BATTEN MEP, Independent UKIP, John Ison, Skeptyk, Steve MORSON | Leave a Comment »

#0327* – UKIP MEP Nikki SINCLAIRE Locates More EU Waste!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 06/03/2011

#0327* – UKIP MEP Nikki SINCLAIRE Locates More EU Waste! 
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
UKIP MEP Nikki SINCLAIRE Locates More EU Waste!
As Featured By The SUNDAY TIMES!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

Yet another excellent exposure of EU profligacy and waste with OUR money!

The News of The World also had a large quantity of material but have been persuaded to suppress it by the intervention of Nigel Farage seeking it seems to damage the efforts of Nikki Sinclaire to do the job she was elected to do – it would seem he has colluded with his mistress Annabelle Fuller and the Tory Head Office plant he placed in UKIP Press Office some time ago Stephen Sobey both of Athena-PR and long term friends and the apparent pack of lies and set-up structured by John Ison who is currently under investigation by the Police for various and numerous thefts.

The News of The World has been advised of the Crime Numbers and the position of The Press Complaints Commission under 10:1 some time ago and hence presumably they have not run with the dishonest penny ante smear set up against Nikki Sinclaire.

It may also have made the claims presented to The Sunday Times which had to be surrounded by ‘Allegedly’ with much frequency and The NoTW position look a little silly on the febrile evidence stolen to try to show what seem to be switched fuel receipts, presumably from one vehicle to another, and then made to look as if Sinclaire had fiddled about £1,200 look even more stupid when Guy Basnett realised from her published accounts, and the extensive help she gave him, that she had donated around £54,000 from her own salary to the cause of EUroRealism and also The Petition for a referendum.

It is worth remembering that when these CLAIMED receipts were being put into the accounts John Ison was responsible for Nikki Sinclaire’s transport and for her to have signed off a receipt it would first have been approved by John Ison who was in a position of trust and commensurately salaried!

I wonder when it will prove expedient for John Ison to turn on his new best friends and betray them as he tried dishonestly to do with the material he stole from Sinclaire?

Nikki SINCLAIRE MEP
Locates The Scanners
for The Sunday Times
Yet More EU Waste!

Airports may get body scanners MEPs won’t use

Scanners bought by the European parliament at a cost of more than £500,000 to improve security at its headquarters have never been used

Daniel Foggo

Published: 6 March 2011
A man demonstrates a check by a full body scanner at Hamburg Airport Many MEPs have reservations about scanners because of human rights issues (Joern Pollex)
Six body scanners bought by the European parliament at a cost of more than £500,000 to improve security at its headquarters in Brussels and Strasbourg have never been used because MEPs objected to the invasion of privacy.
The scanners, which emit low-level x-rays to show images of people naked, have been mothballed in a basement for six years.

Yet MEPs have now asked the European commission to consider the use of body scanners at all airports across Europe. This could lead to passengers being compelled to undergo body imaging before being allowed to fly.

The revelation comes after a series of security breaches at the parliament in Brussels. Last month a French journalist smuggled in an imitation firearm during a visit by Prince Charles to highlight the lax security. There have also been three armed robberies within the confines of the parliament building, leading some MEPs to condemn the security system as a “farce”.

Nikki Sinclaire, MEP for the West Midlands, said: “MEPs put their own self-importance ahead of security in the parliament, with many refusing to undergo the simplest of security checks. Security is a great cause for concern.” The scanners — Rapiscan Secure 1000s — were bought in 2005 at a cost of 725,730 euros (£621,000).

The same model is being used at Manchester and Heathrow airports as well as about 70 others in the US. It works by peppering a passenger with very weak radiation in order to project an x-ray image of them on to a viewing screen. This depicts any concealed objects as well as showing intimate areas of the body.

At the time of their purchase, the European parliament was opposed to the use of body scanners in airports. In 2009 MEPs voted to sell the scanners it had bought. Despite slashing the asking price, no buyers have come forward.

The commission has been tasked with considering the use of body scanners. One option is to make them mandatory at all airports. Airports in the EU are now allowed to use the scanners only in an authorised trial of the equipment or in response to a higher threat risk.

Many MEPs still have reservations over the use of the scanners because of human rights issues and possible health risks. EU policy is expected to be decided by July this year.

A spokesman for the European parliament said: “The scanners were bought following September 11, 2001, when the parliament was looking at security measures. They were never intended to be used routinely.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE
 .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Athena-PR, EU WASTE, Guy BASNETT, John Ison, News of The World, Nigel FARAGE MEP, Nikki SINCLAIRE MEP, SCANNERS, Sunday Times | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: