Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • August 2013
    M T W T F S S
    « Jul   Sep »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Archive for August, 2013

The Ferrets in The UKIP Sack Nattrass, Pain etc.

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 31/08/2013

The Ferrets in The UKIP Sack Nattrass, Pain etc.T
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

The Ferrets in The UKIP Sack, or at least squabbling for preferment, Mike Nattrass, Chris Pain etc.!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
my only reservation with this all but standard UKIP style correspondence is the percentage which is supposedly anonymous.Like most honourable individuals I yhave little but contempt for people too ashamed of their actions to put their names to it!

—–Original Message—–
From: mike nattrass <mikenattrass@hotmail.com>
Sent: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:09
Subject: FW: Emailing: STAND UP AND BE COUNTED – RE BAD UKIP MEP SELECTIONS

This is being passed round in the East Midlands.

They are now going nuts in EAST MIDLANDS because they think the MEP LIST IS
A PROCESS RIGGED FROM TOP TO BOTTOM BY TWO PEOPLE nominated by Farage.

Open the attachment.

Mike


Subject: Fwd: Emailing: STAND UP AND BE COUNTED – RE BAD UKIP MEP SELECTIONS
From: chris.ukip@btinternet.com
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:27:23 +0100

I have just had this email sent over to me from Derbyshire. It is apparently doing the rounds in the East Mids.

Regards,

Chris

I am totally shocked that my two local UKIP members from Derbyshire David Gale one of the best police commissioner results for UKIP, and Phillip Rose secretary of the east midlands counties committee, have not made the list to be voted on for the MEP selections.  as these are two hard working local activists, the fact that they have not made the final cut is dubious to say the least.

 

Several of the areas are being represented in the MEP selection process by people they do not want. All our candidates have come from two counties so we have no representation from Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Lincolnshire, Rutland.  This will impact on our vote at the ballot box. The down side of this is that instead of having four MEP’s in the next elections, we will probably only have one. It has been apparent that the list has been picked by Steve Crowther, Party Chairman, raising doubts about his suitability as future chairman of the party.

 

In the east midlands these are the candidates we have been given are as follows:-

 

Barry Mahoney ~ this man has never done anything in or for the region in the last eight years. He did not campaign in the last European election at all, and was not re voted onto the east midlands committee because of his lack of attendance at meetings.

 

Roger Helmer ~ came over from the conservatives, supposed to be retiring through ill health.  He has not been to an East Midlands regional meeting yet even though he has been in the party a year and a half.  He has not contributed financially to the region either.

 

Margot Parker ~ stood against UKIP at the last European elections. She stood in Corby in the by-election which is a plus point for her.  Unfortunately she did not bother to stand for UKIP in a previous council by-election a few months before leaving the seat uncontested.  She also left the general election seat uncontested at the last general elections. Her profession is advising people how to get around EU law, so if she obtains the post of MEP we will be adding to her job CV and she will not be inclined to push forward for the UK to leave the EU.

 

Jonathan Bullock ~ has only been in the party 9 months, he should not be eligible to stand as the criteria is you have to be in the party 12 months.

 

Nigel Wickens ~ nobody knows who Nigel Wickens is.

 

The above does not make good reading for anybody in the party that wants to move forward. I thought the national selection process was a good idea and although, I was not in UKIP during the last European elections these results seem to suggest that the regions selection process was a far better process last time. The fact that concludes my thoughts is that Lincolnshire activist, Christopher Pain, has not made the list.  He has worked hard for the party for years attained the positions of Branch Chairman, Counties Chairman, East Midlands Chairman, NEC member, County Councillor, organised conferences and had some of the best election results for the party.

 

We then have to look at Mike Nattrass MEP being told he was not worthy for selection in the West Midlands makes a mockery of the all system. He has been one of the most hard working MEP’s, after Nigel Farage, in the whole party.  He has worked tirelessly and donating hundreds of thousands of pounds to the party.

 

Neil Hamilton has been deemed unworthy to stand for selection in the South West, but his silence has been bought by a high luxury job in the party.

 

All three of the following are not in the top 10, but 6 people who are not known in the area are above them, why?

 

In the south east Steve Harris their regional organiser was number 3 candidate on the last MEP list.

 

Andrew Montclies ex NEC member and policy writer for UKIP

 

Piers Wauchop NEC member long standing with 8 years plus as a County Councillor, a hard working kingpin in the south east.

 

In London Paul Oakley is top of the list an unknown character not been a hard working activist for UKIP, yet he has been deemed to be a higher calibre than MEP Gerard Batten.

 

Then we look slightly further afield Jonathan Arnott has been placed number 1 on the list in the North East.  This has dismayed local activists as they have never seen Jonathan Arnott in the region at all, people do not know who he is.

 

David Coburn has been placed number 1 in Scotland the information coming from Scotland is that he has not been there for 30 plus years.

 

These are just a few examples of the bazaar selection process that appears to be riddled with corruption from UKIP.

 

I joined UKIP because I thought they were the party of the people and as an activist I am absolutely distraught at the way many good candidates across the country have been treated and bypassed.

 

I am enclosing the email addresses of all the NEC members and if you agree that the selection of candidates is wrong, please email them and tell them.  If not I am sorry for bothering you, but a big injustice has been done here by our leaders, they are telling you who they want on the selection vote as MEP, not who we want.  What will happen at the next general election if we don’t stand up now and be counted?

 

Fellow activists and I have decided that if this injustice is not addressed we will not be actively campaigning or donating to the European elections at all.  I believed UKIP to be a democratic party yet it appears we are taking on the habits of the EU which I despise strongly

 

Alan Bown  alanbown@btinternet.com

Bours Loise  louisebours@yahoo.co.uk

Chris Pain   chris.ukip@btinternet.com

David Coburn   ClanCoburn@hotmail.co.uk

George Curtis  gscurtis@aspects.net

Gerard Batten  gerard.batten@btinternet.com

Godfrey Bloom  gbloom@ukip.org

Hugh Williams  ughmwilliams@tiscali.co.uk

Jonathan Arnott  vote.jonathan@googlemail.com

Michael Greaves  michael.greaves@gmail.com

Michael Mcgough  michael.mcgough@lineone.net

Neil Hamilton   neilhamilton49@rocketmail.com

Paul Nuttall   ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk

Piers Wauchop  wauchope@hotmail.co.uk

Rod Peers   mepselection@ukip.org

S. J. Crowther  sjcrowther@btinternet.com

Sebastian Fairweather   sebastian.fairweather@ccc.ox.ac.uk

Steven Woolfe  steven.woolfe@ukip.org

Stuart Wheeler  stuartwheeler@chilham-castle.co.uk

 

Regards

A Once Dedicated UKIP Activist

Clearly too gutless to validate their poison pen with the addition of their name, though it seems all too clear who the dweeb who authored this is!Since virtually all appointments within UKIP are orchestrated by one man, internal selections and elections have regularly been rigged and fiddled it is interesrting to note that people like Mike Nattrass who was a main mover in the corruption only speak out when they personally fall foul of the system they helped set up and support!

It does give a measure of the caliber of the trash that form the bulk of UKIP’s hierarchy. Clearly without honour, integrity or basic decency just as with the low lifes who turn a blind eye to the corruption when it works for their gain like Andrew Smith, Gerard Batten, Mick McGough and the anonymised cowards with their lies and unpleasant efforts to defame true supporters of UKIP who seek to clean it up to make it fit for purpose ratheer than fit for personal gain!

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Mike Nattrass vs. UKIP – Judgement 28-Aug-2013

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 28/08/2013

Mike Nattrass vs. UKIP – Judgement 28-Aug-2013
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Mike Nattrass vs. UKIP – Judgement 28-Aug-2013!
A TOTALLY pointless waste of between £10 & 20K with a predictable & inevitable outcome!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 3017 (Ch)
No. 3BM30448

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
CHANCERY DIVISION
BIRMINGHAM DISTRICT REGISTRY

 

Birmingham Civil Justice Centre
28th August 2013

B e f o r e :

HIS HONOUR JUDGE PURLE QC
____________________

#905* - EUkip's Mike NATTRASS FINALLY CLEARED BY OLAF

MICHAEL NATTRASS Claimant
– and –
UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY Defendant

____________________

Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO
Official Shorthand Writers and Tape Transcribers
Quality House, Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP
Tel:  020 7831 5627  Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com

____________________ MR. STEPHEN EYRE (of counsel) instructed by the Wilkes Partnership appeared on behalf of the Claimant.
PROF. MARK WATSON-GANDY (of counsel) instructed by Griffin Law appeared on behalf of the Defendant.

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

JUDGE PURLE QC:

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-GB
X-NONE
X-NONE

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;}

·  In this application Mr. Michael Nattrass seeks an injunction against the United Kingdom Independence Party until trial in the following terms: “The defendant is strictly enjoined and restrained whether by itself its servants or agents or otherwise howsoever from conducting or purporting to conduct a ballot of the membership of the United Kingdom Independence Party with a view to selecting candidates for the election to the European Parliament to be held in June 2014”.

·  I shall refer to the Defendant as UKIP.

·  Mr Nattrass has been a West Midlands UKIP MEP since 2004. The next election will be in 2014. The candidates for the elections will be selected by a national UKIP ballot from amongst those selected for the purpose (60 in number) by a body called the National Selection Panel.

·  A selection process has been gone through which Mr. Eyre, who appears for Mr. Nattrass, has eloquently submitted is legally flawed. Mr. Nattrass was not one of the 60 people who came successfully through the selection process. Approximately 200 people applied, each paying £500 for the privilege, so there are at least 140 disappointed candidates. There are, however, 60 people who would no doubt claim to have been properly selected. Those 60 people prima facie have a contractual right to proceed to the ballot stage, which is a ballot of the entire party. If I granted the injunction that is sought, their apparent contractual rights would be infringed, yet none of them is before the court. It seems to me that that gives Mr. Eyre a real difficulty. However, that is not his only difficulty.

·  The flaws that he relies upon (or did rely upon) were 2-fold. The first was the relatively technical one that no formal resolution constituting the National Selection Panel, as required by the rules, was put to the National Executive Committee. That, however, has been effectively cured, as Mr. Eyre concedes, by a resolution of 18th August 2013 ratifying everything previously done, passed before this claim was brought, with only 1 vote against. Accordingly, Mr. Eyre now limits his legal attack before me to the second ground pleaded which is that there is, he says, an implied term in the rule book that the assessment of potential candidates for elections to the European Parliament would be conducted

(a) fairly, as between the potential candidates,

(b) by reference to objective criteria;

(c) in such a manner that each potential candidate would in interview be given an opportunity to address issues which might materially influence the assessment of his suitability for election;

(d) in such a manner that the criteria were applied and the assessment conducted in the same manner in respect of each potential candidate.

·  It is said that the implication is necessary in order to give business efficacy to the arrangements for the selection of candidates or on the ground of obviousness.

·  The details of the selection process are set out in the rule book, which is itself referred to in the defendant’s constitution and is the governing document for the selection of candidates. Moreover, the rule book was sent to all candidates and entry into the process was deemed to be acceptance of the rules.

·  The rules are very detailed. I turn in particular to section T4 which deals with the National Selection Panel which is to be appointed from among senior party members and chaired by the party chairman. That selection panel is enjoined to appoint three-person Assessment Panels to undertake the assessment and interview process within a prescribed timetable. There are detailed conditions as to how they are to operate. In particular, they are to engage the services of an independent third party recruitment company to assist with the assessment phase and assessment is to include, but not be limited to, various components such as loyalty indicators. It is further provided that candidates should make themselves available for interviews and public speaking tests on dates to be determined. There is a discretion on the National Selection Panel’s part to provide for alternative arrangements in exceptional cases and there are detailed provisions to assist the assessment process such as the organisation of public speaking events. 60 candidates in England are to be chosen. Only those candidates go forward to the ballot stage.

·  Those very detailed provisions, which I have merely summarised, but which cover several pages of the rule book, do not need to be buttressed by implied terms of the sort contended for here. I have no doubt that many of the detailed provisions, such as the reference to an independent third party recruitment company, are intended to ensure that the process is fair, but that is brought about by an express provision. There are many other detailed express provisions, and it is simply not necessary to imply anything further.

·  Moreover, it is not at all clear to me that Mr. Nattrass has established any breach of the implied terms he pleads or, if he has, what the consequences of that breach are. He has not come anywhere near to establishing that he would or should have been selected if the process had been different.

·  It is said that he should have been given the opportunity to comment upon matters which have been taken into account against him in the selection process, in particular loyalty issues. It is said that he was not given that opportunity, which could easily have been afforded to him in interview. Were this a judicial process, subject to the rules of natural justice, Mr Nattrass might have a case, as on his allegations UKIP was, according to him, in breach of the requirements of natural justice. But Mr Eyre, for Mr Nattrass, prudently disclaims any duty on UKIP’s part to observe the rules of natural justice. One can see the intractable difficulties that could lead to. The selection process could be much prolonged and all candidates (not just Mr Nattrass) would have to have the opportunity to comment upon any matter that might be taken into account against them before the process could be concluded.

·  In political life people form views about other people who are in the public eye based upon their track record, and what they have done and said. It seems to me to be quite impossible to argue that there should be a duty to put to a candidate everything that might conceivably be held against that person at the end of the day. What the selection process was meant to achieve was a comparative assessment of all the candidates. One of the reasons for not selecting a candidate may be that there are better candidates. If a duty of natural justice or its equivalent is to be read into the process, then every candidate should presumably have a free reign to comment upon other candidate’s comparative weaknesses, which is clearly not, nor is it claimed to be, the case.

·  It seems to me that what happened in this case does not give rise to a serious argument that Mr. Nattrass has been the victim of a breach of contract or other wrong. In any event, it seems to me that the balance of convenience is very much in favour of allowing the proposed ballot to proceed.

·  I can see that damages is an unattractive remedy for Mr. Nattrass, because he would be in the territory of loss of a chance and there would be major, if not intractable, problems of proof.

·  Nevertheless, I must weigh against that the fact that any injunction I grant now would require, effectively, the whole process to be gone through again with whatever further legal challenge (if any) that may arise at the end of the day after that process has been completed and will disrupt the ballot that everyone is expecting will now go ahead, and the ensuing preparations for next year’s elections, which are fixed in time. It seems to me that the court should require exceptional circumstances before it interferes with the selection processes of a political party and, just as Mr. Justice Stanley Burton in Choudhry v Triesman [2003] EWHC 1203 (Ch), declined to compel a registered political party to allow candidates to stand if the party had genuine and substantial concerns as to the regularity and honesty of the procedure for their selection, so too, in my judgement, where there has been (as in this case) a process, albeit one which (I assume for the purposes of this argument) may be flawed, but which has resulted in the selection of sixty candidates for election, it would be quite inappropriate, save in the most exceptional circumstances, for the court to intervene and interfere with that process.

·  There is no suggestion of corrupt practises in this case, merely of unfairness (I say “merely” without minimising the importance of fairness in public life). There is only so much that the court should be asked to do. The court should be very wary of finding itself in the position where it starts to control part of the ongoing democratic political process in this country. I decline to do so in the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, the injunction is refused.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

A Reminder of the standard of UKIP MEPs with Bloom!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 27/08/2013

Reminder of the standard of UKIP MEPs with  Bloom!

#0124* – UKIP’s GODFREY BLOOMing Stupid – Whores, Plant Pots, Foul Twit TWITTERING

 

 

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 26/09/2010

 

#0124* – UKIP’s GODFREY BLOOMing Stupid – Whores, Plant Pots, Foul Twit TWITTERING

 

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

 

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 

 

 their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

 

UKIP’s GODFREY BLOOMing Stupid Whores & Copulating In The Street,

Banned from DEFRA Fishermen’s Meeting,

Drunk In The EU Parliament Representing YOU,

Running to avoid payment in a Bordello,

Urinating in Plant Pots & Banned from Hotel,

Drunk @ The Mansion House & Banned,

Quotes UKIP for Diplomatic Imunity When Arrested,

Speech proclaiming French Killing Greenpeace Operative,

Now this string of The Foul Twit TWITTERING!

 

 

 

 No Wonder Bloom

 

Uses a Wing Nut

 

To Hold His Head On!

 

Goddersukip

 

  1. I’ll be on Radio 3 Counties today on the subject of Burka at 1 pm http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/threecounties/hi/tv_and_radio/
  2. Listen to me on Alex Jones TV End of National Sovereignty & The Beginning of Global Servitude http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMvSmG6Hhlk
  3. #cop15 is just a scam http://bit.ly/5roZio
  4. @DowningStreet is worried about #climate deniers. We should worry more about the stupid Cnuts inside it. http://bit.ly/6OnIbF
  5. Your problem is not ‘climate sceptics’ @EdMilibandMP but that your self-serving green agenda is too easy to see through http://bit.ly/6OnIbF  
  6. Delegates at #copenhagen who think they can control the elements are a bunch of stupid self-serving Cnuts. http://bit.ly/6OnIbF #eu
  7. Delegates at #cop15 who think they can control the elements are a bunch of stupid self-serving Cnuts. http://bit.ly/6OnIbF
  8. on radio Leeds now!!!http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/playlive/bbc_radio_leeds/#UKIP
  9. Visit my blog on Climate Change http://blog.godfreybloommep.co.uk/#UKIP
  10. ‘ And now – Cameron’s cast iron guarantee to the Countryside Alliance.’ #ukip
  11. On radio Humberside today at 12.15. Subject? Alan Johnson’s admission that Labour made mistakes on immigration http://bit.ly/1BIea .#ukip
  12. http://bit.ly/1BIea2  
  13. So now we know why government scientists talk bollocks on climate change#ukip
  14. Please get me on a quango-I’m skint! #UKIP
  15. It is cooling stupid!!!!!#UKIP
  16. So MPs don’t like retrospective legislation. Who does? the FSA!#UKIP
  17. Live on the Jeremy Vine show at 1.00 today http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/ #UKIP
  18. So our rivers are dirty? Thank you EU 1999 Landfill Directive! #UKIP
  19. I gather the BBC have admitted the globe is cooling! Well well. #ukip
  20. I’m wearing a bow tie today- so there! #ukip
  21. Obama does know how expensive free healthcare is #UKIP
  22. Likes Dan Taylor’s blog http://ddtaylor88.wordpress.com # UKIP
  23. Enough is enough!!!! http://tinyurl.com/m87qb4 #UKIP
  24. From nanny state to bully state http://bit.ly/9ajq7 # ukip
  25. Vote UKIP tomorrow for a REAL change!
  26. Successful last day campaigning!
  27. BBC 1 at 6.30 tonight in the mean time you can go have a look at my latest videos on http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision
  28. I was invited by Whitby fishermen to attend a fisheries meeting. Defra barred me!
  29. Lord Stoddart of Swindon the Independent Labour Peer Says VOTE UKIP
  30. I was on Daily Politics today to explain MEPs expenses. Go to http://bit.ly/1OAeTV and put the timer on 03.15.
  31. http://bit.ly/1OAeTV
  32. Come on `Dave` why don`t you take on `Nige` live or don`t you box out of your weight?
  33. Cameron seems to think Kilroy-Silk left UKIP because we are nutters. He thinks we are nutters because we didn`t elect him leader.
  34. supporting his secretaries Emma and Vicki who are playing cricket for Yapham Ladies tonight!
  35. Very happy to be quoted in Hugh Muir’s Politics diary ( the Guardian) …without being lynched : http://bit.ly/t2Xdtless
  36. No to EU internet regulation!!!! http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision
  37. BBC 5 live on the European elections.Was not too bad (as usual) http://www.bbc.co.uk/fivelive/programmes/mayo.shtml (mark on 41 min)#UKIP
  38. http://www.bbc.co.uk/fivelive/programmes/mayo.shtml
  39. @Towler Help Gawain I am confused by twitter!
  40. Watch my latest videos on gender equality issues.http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision #UKIP
  41. Watch my new video on GoddersVision http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision #UKIP
  42. I voted in the economic and monetary affairs committee this morning. Why do they want to regulate on EVERYTHING? #UKIP
  43. Watch me on http://tinyurl.com/de4zlw timer on 34.15 #ukip  
  44. Tax and spend socialist Ken Clark has put his cock in the custard, it was only a matter of time#UKIP
  45. Welcome to the mad, mad world of the EU http://tinyurl.com/day7gb #UKIP
  46. Why does political compassion always involve taking money from good people and giving it to wasters? #UKIP
  47. Good Piece by Barry Gibson Huddersfield Daily Examiner on Maternity Leave http://tinyurl.com/c95d8r #UKIP
  48. Just arrived in Brussels.Many things on my desk; constituents mugged in Spain, wind farms, maternity leave… #UKIP
  49. A bottle of Champagne for anyone who can tell me when Sir Liam Donaldson was right about anything. #UKIP
  50. Politicians! We are in the shit because we overborrowed. We cannot borrow our way out! #UKIP
  51. How much has the government spent on Classic FM adverts telling us not to over rev our cars? #UKIP
  52. Had a young visitor from Strasbourg University today, he asked me what we had voted on today: Couldn’t tell him, all rubbish. #UKIP
  53. Darling says rich EU countries should help poor ones. Could Luxembourg leave the UK a bag of money by the bin behind No 11 asp? #UKIP
  54. Loony Leila Deen, “greeny Deeny”, is on bail for throwing slime over Mandy, Deeny, baby isn’t he slimy enough? #UKIP
  55. On Lord Mandelson’s green custard incident “I thought he had sneezed” # UKIP
  56. Publican looses everything. Get the timer on to 1.35 http://tinyurl.com/df3p9y
  57. Haven’t Police better things to do than catching a publican smoking in his own bar after hours? What is England coming to?
  58. Gordon Brown has announced he will be devising a system where failure is not rewarded with government money. Ironic or what?
  59. http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision

 

See This Twit’s TWITTERINGS CLICK HERE

 

Childish or what CLICK HERE

 

 

Monday, 07 December 2009 13:23
Paul_and_Godfrey
Legend has it that Cnut the Great, Viking King of England, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, 985-1035, once commanded the waves to stop. Two versions of this story exist, one holding that Cnut really believed that he could do such a thing, the other telling that Cnut’s stunt was merely intended to show that he possessed only the power of any other mortal. Either version contains a lesson in humility for the leaders of the world now assembling in Copenhagen.
They believe that with just a stroke of their bureaucratic pens they can control the elements. A directive can be issued, and LO! Climate change will be stopped in its tracks.
There is a gulf between the minds of the Great and the Good and reality. They are under the misapprehension that we can command the natural world. Even worse, for us, they think that their meeting to create a ‘global deal’ on CO2 emissions will result in world peace, environmental utopia, and every single human on earth dancing for joy at the prospect of being subject to carbon laws, regulation, and taxes. Yippeeeee! No more flights! Waheeey! No more cars! Yahooo! No electricity!
One complete bunch of Cnuts – the editorial team at the Guardian newspaper – believes that it, along with 56 other publications throughout the world, can rightly issue instructions to the world through their editorial columns. The group of 56 newspapers today issued a statement simultaneously urging that there were just ‘fourteen days to seal history’s judgment on this generation’.

The science is complex but the facts are clear. The world needs to take steps to limit temperature rises to 2C, an aim that will require global emissions to peak and begin falling within the next 5-10 years. A bigger rise of 3-4C — the smallest increase we can prudently expect to follow inaction — would parch continents, turning farmland into desert. Half of all species could become extinct, untold millions of people would be displaced, whole nations drowned by the sea. The controversy over emails by British researchers that suggest they tried to suppress inconvenient data has muddied the waters but failed to dent the mass of evidence on which these predictions are based.

There is no science which says that 2 degrees is a special point, and that a temperature rise of 3 to 4 degrees will produce the consequences that the Guardian’s biblical prophecies foretell. These are just political targets, dreamt up by political activists. There is no scientific ‘evidence’ on which such predictions are based, and there are no predictions, just the Guardian’s fantasy. There is nothing like this in the IPCC reports. They have made it up. If you can show me otherwise, please be my guest.
Complete Cnuts ex-Beatle, Paul McCartney, and IPCC Chair, Rajendra Pachauri were in Brussels last week, pushing lentils. They want to persuade the EU to persuade its citizens to stop eating meat because, according to them, eating meat causes climate change. This is the kind of nonsense that the Copenhagen conference (and the EU) is all about – bossing people about, telling them how they should live their lives and what to have for dinner. We had a barbecue in Brussels to let McCartney and Pachauri know what we thought of their silly plan.

Paul Nuttal and me, eating sausages at McCartney and Pachauri.

Silly Cnut, the Prince of Wales has been invited to Copenhagen by the Danish government, according to the Times.

He will travel to the Danish capital in a seven-seat RAF aircraft. His spokeswoman said that it was not possible to travel on a scheduled flight because of prior engagements and the risk of being delayed. … In Brazil earlier this year the Prince warned that fighting global warming should have a higher priority on the world’s agenda than fighting poverty, and that there were only eight years left to save the planet.

It’s easy for Cnut’s like Prince Charles to convince themselves that private jets are necessary for their job of saving the planet, and that poverty is just a trivial problem. He ought to be setting an example, and cycling to Copenhagen.
But Charles won’t be the only Cnut travelling to and around Copenhagen in luxury. The Telegraph reports that

On a normal day, Majken Friss Jorgensen, managing director of Copenhagen’s biggest limousine company, says her firm has twelve vehicles on the road. During the “summit to save the world”, which opens here tomorrow, she will have 200. … The airport says it is expecting up to 140 extra private jets during the peak period alone, so far over its capacity that the planes will have to fly off to regional airports – or to Sweden – to park, returning to Copenhagen to pick up their VIP passengers.

You see, while the world’s top brass pat themselves on the back, arranging for international agreements about what to do with your money, and how to tax and regulate your life, they will be tucking into some of the finest grub in the world, staying in luxurious hotels, and swanning about in carbon-guzzling vehicles, all under the pretence that they are ‘saving the planet’.
The Telegraph mentions some other Cnuts…

As well 15,000 delegates and officials, 5,000 journalists and 98 world leaders, the Danish capital will be blessed by the presence of Leonardo DiCaprio, Daryl Hannah, Helena Christensen, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Prince Charles.

What possible use is there for actor Leonardo DiCaprio at an international conference on climate change? Is it a movie? It’s certainly based on fiction. Maybe he’s playing the Cnut?
Remember, you can’t go to this conference to have your say about your own future, and nobody has asked you what you want the British or EU governments to do in Copenhagen. But DiCaprio is given VIP treatment. All you need to get a seat at this table, it seems, is the right number of millions of dollars in the bank. Then everyone will celebrate your heroic efforts to prevent Armageddon. Meanwhile, you and I will have to pick up the tab for this face-stuffing opportunity for the rich and famous, and live with the aftermath.
Our Prime Minister, who is widely regarded as perhaps the biggest Cnut in the whole country, said in the Observer, yesterday,

Let no one be in any doubt about the overwhelming scientific evidence that underpins the Copenhagen conference. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change brings together over 4,000 scientists from every corner of the world. Their recent work has sharpened, not diminished, the huge and diverse body of evidence of human-made global warming. Its landmark importance cannot be wished away by the theft of a few emails from one university research centre. On the contrary, the pernicious anti-scientific backlash that the emails have unleashed has exposed just what is at stake.

Like his idiot pal, Prescott, Brown has plucked the figure of 4,000 scientists out of thin air. There aren’t 4,000 contributing scientists to the IPCC, as I pointed out a few weeks ago. Why aren’t our most senior politicians in command of the facts? How can they expect us to beleive that they can control the weather if they can’t get such basic matters clear in the minds?Simple numbers like 4,000 and simple facts about the structure and operation of the IPCC ought to be well within their grasp.

The purpose of the climate change deniers’ campaign is clear, and the timing no coincidence. It is designed to destabilise and undermine the efforts of the countries gathering in Copenhagen today.

Too bloody right we want to destabilise and undermine the big party at Copenhagen, Mr. Brown. The reason is that you’re a bunch of self-serving Cnuts, who can’t even get your own facts straight. This much is plain: you don’t know what you’re talking about, nobody voted for you to be PM, and nobody voted for the action you are committing the UK to at Copenhagen. You should worry less about the made up ‘scientific consensus’, and think more about what public opinion says.

 

Childish or what CLICK HERE

Now consider team Junius’ views at the time:

Saturday, 11 September 2010

UKIP: Godfrey Bloom banned from Strasbourg hotels after being caught urinating in the corridors

 

 

 

Godfrey Bloom is a drunk, an adulterer and a fool. Every time he opens his mouth or his trousers he brings the Euro-realist movement further into disrepute.

He has now been banned from several hotels in Strasbourg after being caught urinating in a hotel corridor. He was so drunk that he couldn’t make it to a toilet and so decided to ‘water’ a handy pot plant.

A truly disgusting man.

Godfrey Bloom facts:

He sought to influence the outcome of UKIP’s latest NEC elections by sending out a letter ‘advising’ UKIPPERS how to vote. See: LINK

Bloom has admitted visiting brothels in Hong Kong, and said that the majority of prostitutes were not exploited: “In short, most girls do it because they want to”. Perhaps he would like to tell that to the women forced into prostitution by criminal gangs. LINK

He was once arrested by Brussels Police. He farcically pleaded diplomatic immunity after telling the police that he was a UKIP MEP! Fortunately for Bloom and his black ‘companion’ the Police later released them without charge.

After a visit from female students at Cambridge to Bloom in the European Parliament, he was accused of sexual harassment and making a torrent of misogynist remarks. The students, who had in fact been there to show SUPPORT for Bloom, were shocked by his behaviour. One student wrote that Bloom touched her leg.

Mr Bloom asked a colleague ‘Isn’t she the most delicious bimbette? Absolutely thick, but good tits’. Of the businesswoman who he had invited to share the platform at the next day’s press conference, Mr Bloom had only four words: ‘big tits, very feisty’.”

Bloom denied the touching but not the comments.

The three British MEPs with the worst attendance record are David Bannerman, Paul Nuttall and Godfrey Bloom, each averaging under 63 per cent. LINK

Bloom exploited a loophole to pay a relative to work for him.

He states on his website that he “employs no immediate members of his family on his secretarial allowance unlike most other MEPs”. However Victoria Skowronek, his 21-year-old secretarial assistant, is his niece.

Miss Skowronek also works for an investment company in which Bloom is a major shareholder. LINK

Bloom applauded the French bombing of a Greenpeace ship. One man died in the attack. LINK

Bloom secretly claimed a second EU pension. Another so-called ‘Euro-sceptic’ who is happy to reap the rewards of being a Euro MEP!

Bloom was banned from the Mansion House after a drunken outburst.LINK

And he has even made drunken speeches in the EU Parliament.

And to think that we could have Richard North representing UKIP in Yorkshire! He should have been UKIP’s lead candidate in 2004 but Farage rigged the selection so his drinking buddy could join him in Brussels!

To view the original article CLICK HERE

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Mike Nattrass’ Efforts to Expose UKIP Corruption

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/08/2013

Mike Nattrass’ Efforts to Expose UKIP CorruptionTITLE
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Mike Nattrass’ Efforts to Expose UKIP Corruption now feature in The Mirror! One of the comments was amusing ‘Another picture of Farage drinking. Friggin hell doesn’t he ever stop?’!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage under pressure as own MEP threatens legal showdown

By 

Former deputy leader Mike Nattrass is threatening legal action, claiming Nigel Farage’s party has stitched him up.

Farage is accused of being a 'control freak'
Farage is accused of being a ‘control freak’
Reuters

UKIP is heading for civil war as one of its top Euro MPs claims he has been banned from standing in elections next year.

Former deputy leader Mike Nattrass is threatening legal action, claiming Nigel Farage’s party has stitched him up.

“I’m fighting back with a legal injunction,” Nattrass, 67, told the Sunday People.

“The whole European selection process has been fixed and rules have been ignored. The fight has just started.”

The former property company boss has been West Midlands MEP for UKIP since 2004.

He blames UKIP chairman Steve Crowther for orchestrating a plot to bounce him as a candidate.

And he says he fell foul of the leadership after denouncing a right-wing Italian group with which UKIP was aligned in the European Parliament.

But three years ago he also wrote an email attacking leader Farage as a “control freak”.

It added: “I’m concerned the party brand will be tarnished, even holed below the water line, by his monopoly of power.”

A source said: “Nigel has a long memory for people who have crossed him.”

Last week UKIP was in chaos when chief executive Will Gilpin stepped down after just eight months. He launched a devastating attack on Farage, accusing him of running a party of “enthusiastic amateurs having a good time rather than the professional fighting team they could be”.

It is thought Farage wants to replace Gilpin with ex-Tory MP turned Ukipper Neil Hamilton.

Nattrass has emailed supporters saying: “There has been no reason given for my exclusion from the selection process.” He denies failing “a head-shrinking test”, saying: “I never took one and the shrinks who missed me were the lucky ones.”

Carl Humphries, the Chair of Worcester UKIP branch, is also backing Nattrass. He emailed: “I’m amazed and disappointed to find Mike’s name is not on the list of approved candidates.

UKIP said: “We don’t comment on unsuccessful candidates.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE

To view Mike Nattrass’ original letter regarding Nigel Farage CLICK HERE.

For the full text of Mike Nattrass’ threat to waste his money with Court action he would almost certainly lose CLICK HERE

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 24/08/2013

 

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR! Despite a poll of members of UKIP yet to come the final list will be drawn up at the last minute next year in accord with the wishes of Nigel Farage (See UKIP Constitution!)!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

although UKIP presented its list of candidate MEPs on 17-Aug-2013 it seemed so irrelevant that I have only just got around to publishing it!

UKIP just published a tedious and uninformative list, almost as if they wished to hide the facts from their beguilled followers & the claque, so I have picked up a few more facts for you!

MEP candidates

 

 Category: MEP Candidates
 Published on Saturday, 17 August 2013 06:51
The following people are our candidates for MEP selection and will be voted for by the membership. Ballot papers go out at the end of August an the voting closes on September 20.
England
Nigel Farage
Paul Nuttall
Janice Atkinson
Patrick O’Flynn
Stuart Agnew
Ray Finch
Jonathan Arnott
Roger Helmer
Paul Oakley
Gerard Batten
Godfrey Bloom
Margot Parker
Tim Aker
Andrew Smith
Michael McManus
Jill Seymour
Gawain Towler
Julia Reid
Louise Bours
Michael Heaver
Andrew McNeilis
Jane Collins
John Tennant
Phil Henrick
Jonathan Bullock
Diane James
Jason Smith
Bill Etheridge
Amjad Bashir
Anthony Brown
Elizabeth Jones
Shneur Odze
Tony McIntyre
James Carver
William Dartmouth
Lawrence Webb
Keith Crawford
Alastair McFarlane
Steven Woolfe
Michael  Wrench
Michael Green
Peter Whittle
Robert Smith
Lee Slaughter
Nigel Jones
Mike Hookem
Peter Harper
Simon Strutt
Simon Noble
Andy Monk
Patricia Culligan
Alan Stevens
Mick McGough
Lyndon Jones
Donna Edmunds
Barry Mahoney
Barry Cooper
Nigel Wickens
Gary Shores
Richard Elvin

Scotland

DavidCoburn
Mike Scott-Hayward
Christopher Monckton
Otto Inglis
Paul Henke
Malcolm Macaskill
Ross Durance
Steve McKeane
Kevin Newton

Wales

Nathan Gill
James Cole
Gareth Dunn
David Rowlands
Caroline Jones
Martyn Ford
Brian Morris

Let us break this down into EU regions to make it more intelligible.

Though even this listing is before a NATIONAL vote on Regional issues!

It is before Nigel Farage through his muppets & puppets on HIS engineered NEC has parachuted in a few more drinking buddies and chums at the last minute and selected the order HE wants for each region – as is his perogative as a result of the all too apparently rigged vote on Constitutional amendments to make him effectively the dictator in his very own centralised and authoritarian party where Libertarian would seem to interpret as libertine or louche!

Eastern – shortlist
Patrick O’Flynn
Stuart Agnew
Tim Aker
Andrew Smith
Michael Heaver
Andy Monk
Mick McGough
East Midlands – shortlist
Roger Helmer
Margot Parker
Jonathan Bullock
Barry Mahoney
Nigel Wickens
London – shortlist
Paul Oakley
Gerard Batten
Andrew McNeilis
Anthony Brown
Elizabeth Jones
Lawrence Webb
Alastair McFarlane
Peter Whittle
North East – shortlist
Jonathan Arnott
John Tennant
Richard Elvin
North West – shortlist
Paul Nuttall
Michael McManus
Louise Bours
Shneur Odze
Steven Woolfe
Lee Slaughter
Peter Harper
Simon Noble
South East – shortlist
Nigel Farage
Janice Atkinson
Ray Finch
Diane James
Nigel Jones
Simon Strutt
Patricia Culligan
Alan Stevens
Donna Edmunds
Barry Cooper
South West – shortlist
Gawain Towler
Julia Reid
Tony McIntyre
William Dartmouth
Keith Crawford
Robert Smith
West Midlands – shortlist
Jill Seymour
Phil Henrick
Bill Etheridge
James Carver
Michael Wrench
Michael Green
Lyndon Jones
Yorks & N Lincs – shortlist
Godfrey Bloom
Jane Collins
Jason Smith
Amjad Bashir
Mike Hookem
Gary Shores
Scotland – shortlist
David Coburn
Mike Scott-Hayward
Christopher Monckton
Otto Inglis
Paul Henke
Malcolm Macaskill
Ross Durance
Steven McKeane
Kevin Newton
Wales – shortlist
Nathan Gill
James Cole
Gareth Dunn
David Rowlands
Caroline Jones
Martyn Ford
Brian Morris

Lack lustre and bereft of gravirtas or character as the list may be and with several notable individuals notable for their ignorance, ill manners, temper tantrums, stupidity and either alcohol or sexual abuses and perversions:

Let us make the list even more intelligible with the actual results  (marks) apportioned at the interview/selection stage!

Eastern – shortlist
Patrick O’Flynn – 87
Stuart Agnew – 86
Tim Aker – 81
Andrew Smith – 81
Michael Heaver – 78
Andy Monk – 71
Mick McGough – 70

East Midlands – shortlist
Roger Helmer – 85
Margot Parker – 81
Jonathan Bullock – 77
Barry Mahoney – 69
Nigel Wickens – 68
London – shortlist
Paul Oakley – 83
Gerard Batten – 82
Andrew McNeilis – 78
Anthony Brown – 75
Elizabeth Jones – 75
Lawrence Webb – 74
Alastair McFarlane – 74
Peter Whittle – 72
North East – shortlist
Jonathan Arnott – 85
John Tennant – 78
Richard Elvin – 67
North West – shortlist
Paul Nuttall – 89
Michael McManu – 80s
Louise Bours – 79
Shneur Odze – 75
Steven Woolfe – 73
Lee Slaughter – 72
Peter Harper – 71
Simon Noble – 71
South East – shortlist
Nigel Farage – 97
Janice Atkinson – 88
Ray Finch – 85
Diane James – 76
Nigel Jones – 72
Simon Strutt – 71
Patricia Culligan – 71
Alan Stevens – 70
Donna Edmunds – 70
Barry Cooper – 69
South West – shortlist
Gawain Towler – 80
Julia Reid – 79
Tony McIntyre – 75
William Dartmouth – 75
Keith Crawford – 74
Robert Smith – 72
West Midlands – shortlist
Jill Seymour – 80
Phil Henrick – 78
Bill Etheridge – 76
James Carver – 75
Michael Wrench – 72
Michael Green – 72
Lyndon Jones – 72
Yorks & N Lincs – shortlist
Godfrey Bloom – 81
Jane Collins – 78
Jason Smith – 76
Amjad Bashir – 76
Mike Hookem – 72
Gary Shores – 68
Scotland – shortlist
David Coburn – 75
Mike Scott-Haywa – 75rd
Christopher Monckton = 73
Otto Inglis – 73
Paul Henke – 70
Malcolm Macaskill – 66
Ross Durance – 63
Steven McKeane – 62
Kevin Newton – 56
Wales – shortlist
Nathan Gill – 83
James Cole – 79
Gareth Dunn – 76
David Rowlands – 73
Caroline Jones – 69
Martyn Ford – 69
Brian Morris – 63

Already the controversy rages with a very acrimonious series of comments and media coverage of  the rejected James Delingpole,

A Courtcase has been threatened by the deeply disturbed & disturbing Mike Nattrass ( CLICK HERE )who clearly wants to see his loss of credibility escalate and huge eventual costs when he loses his no hope action (as he lost when he issued writs against The Times but was forced to withdraw when he saw their evidence!).

Then of course there was coverage in many papers such as:

The fruitcake test: UKIP candidates face psychometric testing before being selected …but Godfrey ‘Bongo’ Bloom passed

  • Personality quiz used to check the honesty and reliability of politicians
  • Media skills, public speaking and manifesto knowledge also tested
  • Godfrey Bloom who complained about aid to ‘Bongo Bongo land’ passed
  • But another MEP Mike Nattrass failed to make the grade
  • Tough regime designed to prevent repeat of local elections embarrassment

By Matt Chorley, Mailonline Political Editor

|

‘A ‘fruitcake test’ has been used by the UK Independence Party to uncover unsuitable characters who might embarrass the party.Psychometric tests were used to analyse the personalities, reliability and honesty of more than 300 people wanting to run in next year’s European elections.

Experts were called in to prevent a repeat of May’s local elections when UKIP candidates were accused of sexism, racism and homophobia.

But one candidate who passed with flying colours was Godfrey Bloom, the sitting MEP who last week railed against Britain giving aid to ‘Bongo Bongo land’.

Pass: UKIP's Godfrey Bloom cleared the party's psychometric testing, but last week caused a political storm after complaining about British aid being sent to Bongo Bongo land

Pass: UKIP’s Godfrey Bloom cleared the party’s psychometric testing, but last week caused a political storm after complaining about British aid being sent to Bongo Bongo land

UKIP leader Nigel Farage ordered a shake-up of the party selection process to weed out people with views which risked living up to David Cameron’s infamous claim that the party was a ‘bunch of fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’.

A professional recruitment company was hired to oversee the process, ahead of elections to the European Parliament in May 2014.

To read the rest of the article CLICK HERE

I just love the picture of Bloom looking as barking mad as he clearly is – iresponsible to the last and seemingly due to his hold over Nigel Farage not only out of control but beyond discipline, whether urinating in hotel plant pots, heckling as a guest (on behalf of UKIP voters) at a Mansion House function, being arrested for copulating with a black prostitute on the bonnet of a car in a Brussels street, defaming women or abusing foreigners it rather shows the idiotic inadequacy of Psychometric testing to eliminate fruit cakes and liabilities.

What next will the Farage Party sink to, ouija boards, grapho analysis, crystal balls, astrology and Mystic Meg to make their decisions!

It is bad enough having elected politicians who are not up to the job and spend £Millions on so called consultants to advise them how to do the job for which we pay them but imagine if UKIP were to be elected somewhere one could expect them to squander money on chums with jobs as Tarot Card readers, Rorschach testers and divinets – clearly they can’t even manage basic interviews!

At least we haven’t seen the likes of Annabelle Fuller posting confidential videos on You Tube to try to fiddle the results this time SO FAR! Thus causing genuine Court cases and the resignation of UKIP’s chairman as unwilling to go on telling lies for Nigel Farage to protect his doxies!

Little wonder that Will Gilpin quit the job of CEO, I’m astonished he took so long to realise he would be undermined at every opposrtunity by the crass team of self serving clowns running UKIP!

The office witches & wizards put in place to rig the selection, when some were even standing themselves and most were appointed and salaried by Nigel Farage left Nigel Farage gently fuming in his own party, for which he has made up by promising that the liar and cheat Neil Hamilton, having missed out as a candidate will be given a plum job in the party – some fear it might be to replace Will Gilpin as CEO, others believe it will be as chairman of the party or party secretary!

UKIP with its gaggle of Old Etonian has neens at the top – Malcolm Pearson, Stuart Wheeler, Willaim Dartmouth, Hugh Williams & the rest) gets more like The Extremist Nutter Wing of The Tory Party!

In real terms it would be nice to believe that there was someone on their list of hopefuls whom someone of ethics, intelligence and gravitas might wish to represent them but sadly there isnt – they are by and large a dismal collection of self serving and odious political wanabes!

It was interesting to note that Will Gilpin’s comments on UKIP so closely resembled comments made on this and other bl;ogs that are desperately trying to work to see UKIP cleaned up and distanced from the garbage it has attracted with its dash for numbers rather than calliber, ability, commitment, patriotism, gravitas and responsible planned exit from The EU.

Nationalist, racist, yobbery and cowardly sneering by nebishes too ashamed of their behaviour to pout their name to it or dependent on abuse and insult unsubstantiated by facts, strategy, tactics or a plan serves the EUropSceptic cause ill.
It now starts to look as if UKIP is so unfit for purpose as to be iredeemable and more of a hinderance than a help to the cause! Hence when there has been a massive swing towards opposition to membership of The EU UKIP has failed abysmally to gather together those who would have naturally supported them.

Consider the words of Will Gilpin or for that matter the two untrustworthy liars Marta Andreasen & David Bannerman who despite their basic dishonesty did make many of the same comments! The idiotic comments of the likes of Bloom do much to prove the failure of UKIP as do the efforts of the idiotic in the party who try to sell the false premise thaty there is no such thing as bad publicity – well it seems without bad publicity UKIP doers little to attract good publicity!

Little wonder that UKIP has and continues to fail in domestic politics merely acting as the dustbin for protest votes in EU elections!
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

UKIP: Farage’s kiss of death

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/08/2013

UKIP: Farage’s kiss of death

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

UKIP, or at least the media, are becoming all too well aware that Nigel Farage, although he has ensure he is the only recognisable performer in his party, is likely to prove to be kiss of death to UKIP!
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

I note that Dr. Richard North has made verys similar comments on his excellent and well informed and researched blog as I.

Richard’s comment on his experience with Nigel Farage:
The bigger issue, though, is Farage’s assertion that he is going to take greater control. Long before he became party leader, he and I used to sit in the shared office in Strasbourg discussing the problems of leading such a fractious party as UKIP. And despite having first Michael Holmes and then Jeffrey Titford as leader – MEPs both – we agreed that it was not a good idea to have an MEP in charge.

almost exactly mirrors numerous conversations I have had with Nigel!

In fact I am clearly on record as saying that I would vigerously assist and support UKIP and its aim to Leave-The-EU under even half competent leadership but would implacably oppose it were Nigel Farage stupid enough to become the leader5 as I was well aware of his abilities as a performer but like Richard all to0o well aware of his total inability to lead much more than a rubber duck around a bath on a piece of string – A comment I have made often to0 Nigel himself.

It was clear, even in the early days of UKIP, that Nigel’s management and leadership skills were divisive and self serving rather than competent and his judgement of people was at the very least inept! A little flattery and a semblance of fawning adulation went a long way as long as there was little or no apparent ability or drive, ambition or intellectual gravitas!

I have been proven right time and again as Nigel purged the party of individuals of ability and ethics!

I was right then as is Richard’s title and the facts he puts forward now!

UKIP: Farage’s kiss of death

Richard North, 22/08/2013  


000a Adams-021 farage.jpg

To no-one’s very great surprise, the UKIP saga has continued running, with the BBC and others picking up on the criticisms aired by Will Gilpin, the recently departed chief executive. The thoroughly unprofessional Mr Farage is well in evidence, with the BBC headline telling us that he has too much power in UKIP.

By any measure, therefore, Farage’s response to Gilpin is bizarre. Instead of retrenching, and even showing some signs of remorse, he comes storming back, telling the Telegraph that he will take a step back from public politics so that he can “get a grip” on UKIP by taking “direct control” of the party.

The idea that Farage will also cut back on his media appearances – as he claims – is hard to believe. The man thrives on publicity and cutting him off from the media would be like depriving an addict of his heroin.

The bigger issue, though, is Farage’s assertion that he is going to take greater control. Long before he became party leader, he and I used to sit in the shared office in Strasbourg discussing the problems of leading such a fractious party as UKIP. And despite having first Michael Holmes and then Jeffrey Titford as leader – MEPs both – we agreed that it was not a good idea to have an MEP in charge.

The debilitating effect of the travel, absence from the UK, the complexity of the task in following the EU agenda and exploiting the opportunities afforded by membership of the European Parliament, all meant that it was virtually impossible for any single person to function effectively as both an MEP and a leader. It simply a very bad idea.

Thus, we risked ending up with the worst of all possible worlds, a representative under-performing as an MEP and also making a hash of the leadership – which is precisely what Farage has done.

The problem would not be so acute if the party had an effective management committee (in the NEC), a strong and effective chairman and/or a skilled and effective chief executive with the authority and backing to run the party. But, while lacking almost entirely any of his own management skills, Farage has been able to exercise the dark arts in which he is a consummate practitioner and neutralised these alternative power bases.

For Farage thus to say that he is going to take “direct control” is a harbinger of doom, not least in his unwillingness or inability to control his drinking pal, the oaf Bloom, who seems intent on committing political suicide. The Conservatives must think that Christmas has come early.

Nevertheless, it was UKIP the party that appointed Mr Gilpin. And now that he is complaining of being undermined by Farage, it is thoroughly perverse to have the source of the problem assume control of the mess he has created.

What is more, while there is a managerial vacuum in UKIP, there is an even greater policy vacuum. The Article 50 issue and the exit plan are just two of the areas which need considerable development and firm leadership. For Farage to desert the political leadership of the party, in order to attend to managerial aspects – for which he has little aptitude and almost no competence – is no answer at all.

The thing that makes this all so bizarre though is that Farage, having exercised far too much control in the past, now sees as the remedy exercising even more. This suggests he has learned nothing from recent experience and is entirely impervious to the bad publicity he is currently getting. The Adams cartoon from the Telegraph (pictured) and the number of adverse comments he is getting on the paper’s website all point to his having scored an own goal.

But for those of us seeking improvement in the party, the concern (and energy) might be misplaced. UKIP is beginning to look as if it is beyond redemption. Without a sound ideological base and a competent leader, it may be on its way to the same political graveyard as the Social Democratic Party (SDP) which in the 1983 general election took 28 percent of the vote and has since disappeared.

The SDP’s fate was to be absorbed into the Lib-Dems which, as of last week, were taking eight percent of the polls. Not ever has UKIP approached 28 percent in the polls, so it has less far to fall.

While it may do well in the euro-elections, Will Gilpin himself suggests that UKIP may underperform at the 2015 general election – and that may be the start of its decline to obscurity. Nevertheless, for all his skills, Gilpin has no track record as a political campaigner, but it is fair to say that success depends as much on good administration and management as political skills.

With Farage now assuming greater control over the helm, future campaigns are ostensibly in the hands of a man whose administrative skills do not even stretch to ensuring the publication of expenses claims, thus breaking manifesto promises. His management skills – and certainly his personnel management – can be measured as a minus quotient. There can, therefore, be no confidence that we will see any improvement in UKIP’s performance under Farage’s more direct control.

Then, when it comes to the vital web presence, whatever Will Gilpin’s failings might have been, in Farage we are looking at a man who, until recently, had trouble finding the “on” switch on a computer. He had to get his staff to print his e-mails so that he could read them.

More importantly, we are now looking at a politician who is failing to respond correctly to political signals. Far from resuscitating UKIP’s management, he is so badly misreading the signals that he is courting catastrophic failure. 

But the greater disaster is a party that cannot control or restrain its own leader. This is a party which has received the kiss of death. It is sadly ironic that it should come from one of its founders, who is now set to preside over the decline of his own creation.
To view Richard’s original article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Is This The Beginning Of The End of UKIP?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 21/08/2013

Is This The Beginning Of The End of UKIP?
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Is This The Beginning Of The End of UKIP? As the media exposes more and more of their crass and irresponsible behaviour and Nigel Farage tries to retrench by withrawing from the one job he CAN do to do one he is a proven failure at!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

I believe UKIP has been shown in its true colours – I dealt with much of what is revealed, yet again, at CLICK HERE

Nigel Farage wants Ukip to remain ‘a bunch of amateurs’

Ukip cannot become a professional political organisation that threatens the main parties because Nigel Farage refuses to give up power over it, the party’s former chief executive has said.

Chief executive of Ukip leaves after eight months in job

Mr Gilpin is said to have left on good terms 

Will Gilpin, who left his job this week, said that Mr Farage’s reluctance to accept professional management means Ukip will remain “a bunch of enthusiastic amateurs” who never fulfil their political potential.

Mr Gilpin, a former RAF pilot hired to professionalise Ukip, told theTelegraph that Mr Farage and his inner circle resisted his efforts to improve the party’s management and organisation.

Mr Gilpin is a former RAF Tornado pilot who then spent a decade working on major projects for organisations including BP and the Home Office.

He joined Ukip last year, and said he found a chaotic and disorganised party built around Mr Farage’s personality and whims.

“The thing I am most shocked by is that Nigel does his own thing without the party knowing where he is or what he is doing,” he said.

“Nigel is a great orator and a useful man for the party, but you have to use him in the scope of the wider organisation, rather than thinking ‘It’s all about Nigel’.

“Nigel would see the party as being about him. The party is structured like a flying wedge, pushing Nigel forward.”

Focusing on the 2015 general election, Mr Gilpin drew up plans for a standardised plan for election campaigns across the country, a “lessons learned” culture to ensure constant improvements, and a training regime for staff and candidates. He also planned a new structure to address the “big hole” in Ukip’s policy agenda.

Updating the party’s organisation would inevitably reduce Mr Farage’s influence over Ukip, Mr Gilpin said. “Nigel has to have less power. There is no way around it.”

What’s the biggest problem facing Ukip?
They’re not professional enoughThe fact that they’re not polished is an asset to them – it’s our voting system that limits themNigel Farage has too much control over the partyNigel Farage doesn’t have enough control over the partyThey don’t promote or value women

However, he said, he was blocked by Mr Farage and his circle, who resisted changes that would formalise party rules and make them more accountable to members.

“The leap from being a small group of people who have fun and do what they want to being a professional political party was too much,” Mr Gilpin said.

The refusal to change will limit Ukip’s ability to win Westminster seats in 2015, he said.

“The party has decided it likes things the way they are – so Ukip remains a bunch of enthusiastic amateurs having a good time, rather than the professional fighting team they could be,” he said.

“Individually, they have the skills to make that happen, but that means working together, and that is not really happening.”

In 2015, Mr Gilpin said, Mr Farage and his team will underperform.

“They might still win some seats – but not as many as they would if they organised and structured themselves to make the most of what they have,” he said.

Ukip sources have this week suggested that Mr Gilpin left because he was better suited to running IT systems than to a senior management role.

Mr Gilpin said he left the party because of Mr Farage’s refusal to implement his plans.

“I left by mutual agreement in response to my dissatisfaction at the fact I was not being allowed to do the job I was hired to do, which was to professionalise the party,” he said.

A Ukip spokesman said that Mr Gilpin “leaves with a great deal of warmth”.

He said: “He has worked very hard to provide the structures that he was asked to provide and which proved very uncomfortable to some in the party. He has been very successful and we wish him all the best.”

The party has not said who will replace Mr Gilpin. Rumours have suggested that Mr Farage is keen for the job to go to Neil Hamilton, the former Conservative MP who joined Ukip in 2002, but party sources insisted that was not the case.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

It becomes increasingly obvious that Farage’s party is unfit for office and is incompetent to manage its own affairs with any sense of responsibility let alone represent the voters in any position of authority.

One is forced to wonder if on top of the huge number of allegations of corruption and dishonesty that UKIP has been totally incapable of rebutting over many years and the many broken promises they have made to gain election (though largely they have failed to dupe the voters) could these latest revelations together with the all too plausible claims of rigging the selection of their list of staggeringly mediocre MEP candidates could this be the beginning of the end of the Farage cult?

That in the form of UKIP Farage’s cult is further demeaned by the crass comments of senior members like Godfrey Bloom, the appointment as a ‘fit individual’ of the liar & cheat Neil Hamilton to their NEC or the fantasist and thoroughly unpleasant and crass Mick McGough as an executive of the clique on the NEC – there are so very many examples that it merely becomes a bore to list them again when the articles regarding the departure of their CEO and the desperate efforts of Farage to try to hold the line, as shown in the media article below are so damaging.

Clearly yet another nail in the coffgin of any pretence that Farage’s party has any credibility comes with their MEP and past deputy leader of the party resorting to law to try to force UKIP to act legally and ethically (fat chance!) CLICK HERE

Nigel Farage to take a step back from politics to ‘get a grip’ on Ukip

Nigel Farage has said that he will take a step back from public politics so that he can “get a grip” on Ukip by taking “direct control” of the party.

Nigel Farage: ‘By offering a £1,300 voucher to those in two income households while dismissing single earning households shows contempt for more than a million families who opt for the more traditional child rearing structure. ‘ Photo: Getty Images

Following criticism from Will Gilpin, Ukip’s former chief executive, Mr Farage said that he will now do “less politics” in a bid to “professionalise” the organisation.

Mr Gilpin, who left this week, said that Mr Farage’s reluctance to accept professional management means the Ukip will remain “a bunch of enthusiastic amateurs” who never fulfil their political potential.

He said that Mr Farage “has to have less power” if Ukip is to become a professional political organisation.

However, in an interview with The Telegraph, Mr Farage said that Mr Gilpin “couldn’t be more wrong”.

Mr Farage said that he had given up “total control” of the party in 2010 in order to “lead” rather than “manage” Ukip.

“I gave up total control of Ukip in 2010,” Mr Farage said. “I got re-elected on the slogan of ‘Vote for me to lead the party not run or manage it’.”

In an apparent criticism of Mr Gilpin’s work with Ukip, Mr Farage added: “The party does need professional management but thus far we haven’t found the person to deliver it.”

Mr Farage said that he will now take more control of the party until he is “confident” the right managerial structure is in place.

“I gave up all managerial control of the party in 2010, I gave it up to a new group of people and at the moment we haven’t got to where we need to and so therefore…I will now be once again taking back some direct managerial control of the party until I’m confident we’ve got the right people in place.

“I will have to do less politics, fewer interviews, fewer public meetings, fewer appearances and I will have to spend more time directly overseeing the jobs being done, because the problem we have had is one of non-delivery.”

Asked if that will mean he is less of a public figure in the coming months Mr Farage said: “I’m afraid I’m going to have to be. It’s not what I intended but we do need to get a grip on things. We do need to professionalise things and so I’m going to have to take a much more direct, managerial role.”

What’s the biggest problem facing Ukip?
They’re not professional enoughThe fact that they’re not polished is an asset to them – it’s our voting system that limits themNigel Farage has too much control over the partyNigel Farage doesn’t have enough control over the partyThey don’t promote or value women

However, Mr Farage also said that he “hopes” Ukip members are “enthusiastic amateurs”.

“In many ways I think that enthusiastic amateurs and people who actually believe in what they are doing is in a way our key energy point and our key dynamic,” he said. “All you have to do with that is to make sure that it’s managed and directed in the right way.”

Mr Gilpin has said that his departure was prompted by Mr Farage’s refusal to implement his plans.

“I left by mutual agreement in response to my dissatisfaction at the fact I was not being allowed to do the job I was hired to do, which was to professionalise the party,” he said.

The party has not said who will replace him, but rumours suggest Mr Farage wants Neil Hamilton, the former Conservative MP who joined Ukip in 2002.

A Ukip spokesman said that Mr Gilpin “leaves with a great deal of warmth“.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Clearly the article above shows just how much of a problem Farage and his party have – the dilema is that having regularly purged his party of anyone who might challenge or outshine his particular talents as a performer he now findas himself in a position of desperation where he feels forced to give up the one thing he is indisputably good at – being the affable cheeky chappie as a performer with his 3 or 4 set speeches and his readiy if disingenuous smile acting as the party performer and face of the party to try to manage the party – a job for which he has shown no ability nor credibility.

We must remember that it was Farage who has repeatedly promised to professionalise the party before elections over many years yet has abjectly failed to deliver. It was also Farage who promised the electorate that no one in UKIP would ever employ family, on Meridian TV and elsewhere, yet was exposed paying his wife Kirsten £30,000 a year by Daniel Foggo in the broadsheet media.

Subsequently it was shown that even his constituency office was not only unaware of this dishonest scam but could identify no work that Kirsten Farage performed for the party!

Then it was found that despite reaffirmation of the promises Farage’s drinking buddy Godfrey Bloom was not only renting a family owned property but employing members of his family. There were also allegations that Farage’s long term associate Gerard Batten was using UKIP money to publish anti Islamic pamphlets likely to incite racial disharmony and paying over the odds to his brother to print them!

It has also been shown on the public record that sums of money which may well exceed at least a £Million has been spiritted away unaccounted for not to mention substantial sums of money converted from the party RBS bank account as unaccountable cash.

There is also the matter of over 50% of Nigel Farage’s office account of some £450,000 being glibbly dismissed as ‘Sundry expenses’  whilst the accountant who presented the account from the trial balances of David Samuel Camps (Office Manager of a staff of 2!) the accountant was paid £6,000!!!

What happened to the cinsequential amount of cash collected in buckets by Nigel Farage’s placement John Moran, during the period when UKIP was trying to gain publicity from their breech of electoral law, for which they were found guilty!
OR
for that matter what happened to over 85% of the cash collected as a result of the Ashford, apparent scam, also involving the proven liar John Moran and others – it was Richard Suchorzevski who exposed the probable fraud and theft of the money which the chairman at the time David Bannerman admitted in a public meeting was unaccounted but that less than 15% of the money collected ever reached UKIP!

Now we are expected to believe that Nigel Farage has the skills, competence and experience to professionalise his party – I think not, when you consider his staggering lack of jusgement when it comes to appointments and backing them, to name a few:
Godfrey Bloom, Mark Croucher, Clive Page, Annabelle Fuller, Hugh Williams, Robert Kilroy Silk, Marta Andeasen, David Bannerman, Christopher Monkton, Andrew Smith, Tom Wise, Mick McGough, Douglas Denny, Neil Hamilton, Michael Pearson, Gawain Towler and many others who have similarly proved to be catastrophic for the party in their own varied ways.

Clearly Fasrage is NOT the man to professionalise his party he has shown he is not fit for the job!

UKIP chief walks out after only eight months after struggling to adapt to ‘individualistic DNA’ of the party

  • Chief executive Will Gilpin ‘far better suited to’ corporate IT, say party sources
  • Former RAF pilot hoped to make UKIP more professional
  • Ex-Tory MP Neil Hamilton rumoured as replacement

By Gerri Peev

|

The chief executive of UKIP has left after only eight months in the job, because he struggled to adapt to the ‘individualistic DNA’ of the party.

Will Gilpin, a former RAF pilot, started at the UK Independence Party last December, hoping to make it more professional.

But Mr Gilpin, who has also worked as a computer security guru and Home Office adviser, is now returning to corporate IT, which party sources say ‘he is far better suited to’.

‘Mutual agreement’; Will Gilpin will leave his role as chief executive of UKIP

'Mutual agreement': Will Gilpin will be leaving UKIP after only eight months to return to corporate IT ‘Better suited’: Gilpin will return to his career in corporate IT

Mr Gilpin, a former RAF pilot, started at the UK Independence Party last December, hoping to make it more professional.

But Mr Gilpin, who has also worked as a computer security guru and Home Office adviser, is now returning to corporate IT, which party sources say ‘he is far better suited to’.

The party said Mr Gilpin had struggled to adapt to working at a smaller organisation which relied heavily on volunteers, and where the ‘DNA is individualistic’.

UKIP insisted there was no bad blood and that the decision not to renew his contract had been made by ‘mutual agreement’.

A party spokesman said: ‘We thank him for his time, effort and the hard work he has put in and wish him all the best for the future.’

A source added that there was ‘no question of Will failing in the role’.

There is now speculation that former Tory MP turned UKIP supporter, Neil Hamilton, may take the top role. But the spokesman said he was ‘not aware’ of this.

Mr Gilpin, who describes himself as ‘socially liberal’, graduated from Cambridge with a computer science degree.

The former Tornado pilot also has a psychology degree from the Open University, makes films and builds websites.

 

He has already updated his profile on professional networking site LinkedIn.

It lists his past occupation as ‘CEO/Head of IT for a political party’. It does not name UKIP.

Mr Gilpin has also worked for the Home Office, Learning and Skills Council, Lloyds TSB and BP.

Top job: Former Tory MP Neil Hamilton has been rumoured to be in line for the chief executive role in UKIP, though the party will not confirm this

Top job: Former Tory MP Neil Hamilton has been rumoured to be in line for the chief executive role in UKIP, though the party will not confirm this

UKIP has enjoyed a huge surge in popularity over the past year and is now third in the opinion polls, at 14 per cent, in front of the Lib Dems on ten per cent.

But it has still been embroiled in controversy thanks to some of its more eccentric members.

Earlier this month, it emerged that UKIP candidate Dean Perks had given a speech supporting Sharia law. He said if someone was faced with the threat of having their hand chopped off, they would not steal.

Just days later, UKIP MEP Godfrey Bloom prompted outrage by suggesting that foreign aid was going to ‘bongo bongo land’.

RTo view the original article CLICK HERE

It is clear that the media is developing a contempt for Farage’s partyy and as such UKIP’s meaningful support is bound to be damaging as the truth about their inadequies to the task and both corruption and crass behaviour render the party unfit for office in its present form – A fact that Will Gilpin is merely the most recent of a long line of competent people has shown – though to be fair UKIP has gained in support with the demise of The BNP and as a result of their own racism and anti homosexuality with its associates in their EFD Group!

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Antics of Nattrass & more alleged UKIP coruption!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/08/2013

The Antics of Nattrass & more alleged UKIP coruption!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

The Antics of Nattrass & more alleged UKIP coruption!!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

look more knockabout fun and allegations of coruption in UKIP as the in fighting and unprofessional self serving squabbling goes on – It would be hilarious were it not so damaging for the more serious supporters of the aim to Leave-The-EU via a Referendum and Article #50!

All this as the bufoon Godfrey Bloom as a drinking buddy of Farage makes yet another tasteless and crass outburst and UKIP loses its CEO Will Gilpin who has found UKIP unprofessionalisable and undisciplined akin to ‘herding cats’.

Clearly the recent lesson of failure of around 1600 of there some 1,750 candidates in the local elections and the fact they are nowhere near getting an MP elected, not even in a by-election seems to have taught Farage’s clique and its claque nothing – little wonder no one of stature or gravitas wittingly supports their all too personal ambitions and the endless squabbling like ferrets in a sack!

—–Original Message—–
From: mike nattrass <mikenattrass@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 8:32
Subject: FW: I NEED YOUR HELP !!!!!!

I am unsure if you have seen this and sorry to bother you, but I am under attack from people who are unwilling to state their case.

The message below has been sent out by Carl Humphries of his own initiative and I have not been involved in writing it.

I will be taking legal action against the UKIP NEC, as I can see that the UKIP MEP selection process rules have not been followed. This will be my last resort having tried to extract the reasons on a friendly basis. Many on the NEC can see what is happening and agree with me.

There has been no reason given for my exclusion from the MEP selection process, nor for other candidates who deserve to be listed and put before the UKIP membership for a democratic result.

In my case the hustings and an interview were the total process and no other tests. Existing MEPs being excluded from the other two aspects. The interview was a panel of three, of whom two have not been in UKIP long and were lacking in experience and had no understanding of the West Midlands at all nor the history of UKIP and the third was Steve Crowther UKIP Party Chairman. No “problems” were mentioned at that interview!

One of the three is an employee of a fellow candidate and another an employee of the party. Much to the surprise of certain NEC members who thought the NEC would choose!

When I asked why I was excluded Steve Crowther said it was “consultants” but in my case I met not a single consultant and the Daily Mail says I failed a head shrinking test which I never took……….. and the shrinks that missed me were the lucky ones!

If you wish to reply to Carl on ukip21st@hotmail.co.uk please do.

If you have questions please ask.

This is a party believing in a local referendum, with some of us saying “Let the people decide” So why are people in our party worried about a free choice of candidates?

Regards.

Mike

I did not consider it was worth publishing the eMail below last week but the receipt of Mike Nattrass’ earlier today made it somewhat more relevant!


From: ukip21st@hotmail.co.uk
To: jgh45@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: I NEED YOUR HELP !!!!!!
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:52:54 +0100


To all UKIP members in my contact list ,

During the past 3 years I have spent countless hours of my time and several thousand pounds of my own money promoting UKIP . During this time I have had the support of Mike Nattrass our local MEP .

I am most amazed and very disappointed to find that Mike’s name is not on the list of approved candidates for next years European Elections . I don’t know if this is an error by the selection committee or a deliberate omission . I hope that it is the former .

I have spoken to Mike and he wishes to continue representing us .

This is where I need you help . Please send me an email expressing your support for Mike .

I will then email Nigel Farage requesting him to show leadership and support for one of his UKIP loyal members and that he insists that Mike’s name is added to the list .

When you read the above attachments you will realise that Mike’s CV is second to none .

I look forward to receiving you support .

Carl Humphries

Chairman , UKIP worcester and District Branch .

Many will remember the corruption of the last MEP selection process and the report by the then returning officer that utterly damned the party CLICK HERE

Interestingly as Mike Nattrass was not himself disadvantage in the last selection process he did not speak out then in support of those who were yet when it happens again and to him it seems he is all too willing to protest!

I wonder whether his utterly inefectual performance as an MEP might have influenced the selecting clique – though were that the case few would be on the list atall!

Might it have been his much publicised daliance with a woman outside of his marriage that led him to be thrown out by his wife, or the realisation of how costly divorce would be and his complete vault face as he ditched his ethics and integrity rejoining the UKIP racist and anti homosexual extremist EFD Group to try to secure his place on the gravy train to possibly fund his divorce that led to his de-selection.

Maybe having failed his return to his wife and parting with his mistress may also have had influence.

Maybe it was his uncontrollable temper and obscene language at NEC meetins etc. that may have held sway – I do not believe we will ever know as any spin from UKIP, based upon past experience is likely to be a pack of lies as it has been previously in Court!

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Publicity Is Not Always Good as UKIP Will Learn!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/08/2013

Publicity Is Not Always Good as UKIP Will Learn!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

The sad figure of Godfrey Bloom demonstartes, yet again, Publicity Is Not Always Good as UKIP Will Learn!!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

Hi,

it is sad to note that such a highly paid political bufoon honestly believes that any publicity is good publicity!

Let us not forget he founded and chaired the Pan EU Political Alliance Group of which Marine LePen is a member just as Farage’s party UKIP did likewise to form the EFD Group which links them undeniably with racists, anti Jewish, anti homosexual Holocaust Deniers and violent criminal extremists.

Fringe politics has all too many self serving over paid fools – don’t for a moment think it is only the two main parties that have that embarrassment!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

Here is the provenance of his damaging idiocy:

Ukip MEP Godfrey Bloom: Women Better In The Pantry Than In A Car

  Posted: 20/08/2013 13:15 BST  |  Updated: 20/08/2013 13:17 BST

The Ukip MEP who was accused of racism after he referred to countries that received aid from Britain as “bongo bongo land” has said women are better in the kitchen and men who support feminism are “effete”.

“Most women can find the mustard in the pantry quicker than a man and most men can reverse a car better than a woman,” Godfrey Bloom said on Tuesday.

He added: “Men and women care about different things on a micro-scale. Leaving the lavatory seat up, wet towels on the bed and the top left off the toothpaste will drive a wife mad.

“A man simply cannot understand what the problem is. Most wives do not regard putting petrol in the car as any part of their responsibility. Men cannot see the point in making the bed if you are going to get back in it tonight.”

Writing on Politics.co.uk, Bloom did admit there were some exceptions to this rule, but said those women who could park a car well was “not the norm”.

Bloom also attacked modern feminism as being spawned by “rather shrill, bored, middle class women of a certain physical genre”.

And he said they were supported by men who “seem to have no link with the usual social and sporting male preserves” who were “slightly effete politically correct chaps who get sand kicked in their face on the beach”.

The MEP also was keen to defend his own “alpha male” credentials. “I would not be caught dead at a birth of a baby and I’m happy to punch the first man who tries to steal my beer,” he said.

Earlier this month Bloom provoked a serious backlash following his characterisation of places that receive UK development aid as “bongo bongo land”.

He defended the comment on a variety of grounds, including the claim the word was actually the name of a type of “white” animal. And, therefore, not racist

“If anybody would care to take a look at the Oxford dictionary this morning, they would find ‘bongo’ is a white antelope that lives in the forest,” he said. “There is no connotation of racism about whatsoever. ‘Bongo land’ is the land of the antelope.”

To view the original media article CLICK HERE

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

FOR THE RECORD – A STATEMENT OF FACTS

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/08/2013

FOR THE RECORD – A STATEMENT OF FACTS

Hi,

For the record – despite the obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies of those trying to hide the truth about UKIP as it is – It is of absolutely no consequence how many read this blog or this web site or my Twitter or my postings around the internet and elsewhere, just like UKIP membership numbers are of no consequence just as it is irrelevant how many watch a UKIP video in America, China or even France – it is a matter of the caliber of those who read the entries NOT numbers.
This web site and all its entries are posted as an archive and if ONE person of influence reads it whether media, politician or individual and it leads to cleaning up & professionalising UKIP & giving it some ethical gravitas and consequence thus making it fit for purpose as a party, which British citizens would be proud to join to Leave-The-EU, it has served its purpose.
This blog is an archive available to all and made as accurate as possible, clearly differentiating between my opinions and values and factual reportage of UKIP.
As is clear: Any error of fact is always corrected, if brought to my attention, and comments are always published – for as long as they are compliant with the terms clearly stated as follows:

We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse.

No comment has EVER been barred or deleted, which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual.

You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner.

We welcome genuine comments.

From my conversations with Team Junius I gather their aims were largely similar, as was their aim to inform and provide an archive of facts in support of UKIP becoming fit for purpose to lead to Leave-The-EU, which clearly it currently is not, as it tends to represent its own personal ambitions rather than British self determination, values and ethics.

At the moment Junius team have largely stopped addressing UKIP’s problems, in the belief that it is unlikely that UKIP will have any consequential influence on domestic politics after their failure in the local elections of 2013 when out of over 1,700 seats in which they stood candidates a mere 147 were elected and already they are falling by the wayside and or resigning due in part to lack of vetting, lack of professionalism and in some cases over racism, inappropriate behaviour and convictions for theft etc.

UKIP’s achievements are so clearly the product of a single individual that Junius has stood back from their role exposing UKIP’s ineptitude and dishonesty as unfit for purpose as to continue putting their own jobs at risk is no longer of sufficient consequence in the light of UKIP’s failure to obtain MPs, Police Crime Commissioners, Mayors or any other role of any gravitas or significance in domestic politics in 20 years.

Team Junius, I am told, possibly re-enter the position of political commentary if the situation alters and UKIP becomes of greater relevance in UK domestic policy rather than self serving also rans!

For more FACTS regarding the accuracy of this site and my postings elsewhere read CLICK HERE
For more FACTS & information about me, including contact data, IF it will help you understand the FACTS this web site and my many other postings cover CLICK HERE

I NEVER post in cowardly anonymity, nor obfuscate my identity as I believe it is an ethical matter of integrity to stand by ones comments. If unsure or deliberately misleading one should NOT demean oneself by dishonesty hiding one’s identity as a coward or a traitor would.

For the record I have NEVER had personal aspirations politically, nor have I ever stood for office; further I have NEVER joined or been a member or been funded by any political party, faction or similar organisation.

I trust these facts help clarify details for the ill informed and the outright liars who seek to defame me, my blogs, postings and web sites.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: