Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 18/03/2012
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/02/2012
It is clear that on a greatly rising tide of EUroScepticism UKIP’s failure is exacerbated by the behaviour of its aspirant supporters (cowards, cheats, liars, fraudsters and cyber bullies) and association with racism, anti homosexuality, holocaust denial, anti judaism, advocacy of violence and the dregs of EUropean politics!
The lack of leadership ability, strategy or valid tactics is a reflection of the clear lack of professionalism and disinterest in its membership or Country beyond self enrichment of a small clique and agrandisement of their claque!
Just consider CLICK HERE!
I note the cyber cowards and liars are up to speed with their jobs!
Whether individuals like Independent UKIP, Skeptyk, Gothmog, KrisH and the like are merely cowards who know they are telling lies and are ashamed or are rewarded for their dishonesty and unpleasant manner, so damaging to UKIP and the EUroRealist cause and therefore having prostituted their ethics is a matter of conjecture but endlessly having them repeat their lies and feeble efforts as cyber bullies hidden behind the cowardly cloak of anonymity without being denounced by UKIP has done the party immense harm.
As a member ‘Trusted’ on the UKIP controlled squalid little Forum of Antyhony Butcher’s Independent UKIP currently leads the charge!
Independent UKIP Trusted Member
Despite being a compulsive liar Mr Lance-Watkins maintains he always tells the truth in everything he says. Despite obdurate rudeness over many months you maintain you’ve never been rude. Is he grooming you to take over? You’re demonstrating increasingly familiar traits.
Clearly a dishonest attempt to mislead people as neither Independent UKIP nor any of the other maggots feeding on the corruption in UKIP, and too ashamed to use their own names when abusing people, has EVER shown a single solitary consequential inaccuracy in ANY of my many 1,000s of postings!
I am also unaware of them ever being able to materially fault those posting as Junius. I am aware they haven’t a clue who posting facts as Junius but I am aware that there is a strong possibility UKIP may find itself in Court YET AGAIN were they to interfere in someone’s employment based on their various false guesses!
I note (thanks) that Niall warry has read my blog, as do UKIP leadership and their puppets and muppets, desperately trying to find a factual inaccuracy – at which they have clearly and totally failed to date. Much as they may wish to disagree with the clearly stated opinions I also voice!
Niall Warry quoted:
Niall Warry Uber Member
GLW ends his latest blog entry with this:-
Our thanks to the many who ensure we maintain the accuracy and veracity of our postings and have done so for several years & many 1,000s of postings both on our own blogs, YouTube, eMails & Forums.
You will note I ONLY publish the facts which I am willing to put my name to, and I do NOT use obfuscating or deliberately misleading identities to make ANY Posting on the internet on ANY subject.
My identity and contact data are readily available:if you require more details do either seek them out at:
IF you are interested in Health data see:
Life’s Roller Coaster – http://GregLW.blogspot.com
IF this still leaves you with reasonable details unanswered please feel free to contact me and ask directly for as long as you are prepared to, politely in an adult manner, use your real name.
The whole post is here:-
UKIP – vs – EUkip: ENSURING ACCURACY & THE TRUTH
Go on give him a call if you have a query.
To which the clearly deeply challenged UKIP useful idiot postulated:
Yet one notes that in the many 1,000s of postings I have made on my blogs, other blogs and web sites – Forums and eMails UKIP have been unable to identify a single solitary factual error of any material consequence.
Yes I have an axe to grind – does not everyone of any ability to reason? One of those axes is that I can not stand corruption amongst those I misguidedly supported. I find use of fake identities to abuse and berate private individuals in ad hominem attacks beneath contempt, I am disgusted by betrayal by those I aided and voted for, I have nothing but contempt for UKIP leadership which has NOTHING to publicly curb the cyber bullying and clear dishonesty of some of its leadership and many of its supporters, presumably in aspirant hope of reward.
I have utter contempt for fraud, liars, cheats and those who seek self enrichment and self agrandisement willingly involved in racism, religious bigotry, anti homosexuality, anti judaism and espousing violence as a primary plank of political achievement or those willing to associate with such behaviour.
I have NEVER denied that I am an individual of VERY clear and openly stated opinions and values and for the likes of the creepy succubi, puppets and inccubi of UKIP leadership to berate me for having clearly held values and opinions makes them look the fools they clearly prove to be!
FOR THE RECORD:
Yet again I repeat I have NEVER, on any issue in any place or at any time, have I deliberately lied or set out to mislead anyone on any issue.
Further in all my many postings on the internet I have ALWAYS shown clearly who I am and have always made my contact details readily available.
Further I have ALWAYS strenuously endeavoured to provide accurate FACTS and clear opinions.
Further I have ALWAYS made it clear that if ANYONE believes I have made an error of FACT and have contacted me in a polite and adult manner using an identified and contactable legal persona I have been all too willing to correct any fact which they can substantiate to be untrue.
To date NEVER has any material FACT of consequence been shown to be false, untrue or deliberately misleading.
IF you disagree and can show reason for any material FACT to be corrected do contact me and any required and substantiated substantive correction will be made, acknowledged and if need be apologised for. I will NOT merely make a clandestine adjustment or removal of such an error!
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 11/02/2012
The elected list, I am reliably informed by several individuals, was:
1st David Coburn
2nd Lawrence Webb
3rd Paul Oakley
4th Steven Woolfe
5th Helen Dixon
6th Elizabeth Jones
Is this what UKIP wishes for our country, rigged elections and selection processes overriding the democratic rights of the voters?
I have been promised a number of letters including resignation letters which I will publish if they take the factual position forward constructively towards a Clean-Up of UKIP to TRY to make it fit for purpose rather than an aid to The EU!
Just consider where the corruption of elections has led UKIP – it was Farage’s CHOICES like David Bannerman, Stuart Agnew (Thick as pig sh*t but loaded – to quote Farage), Ashley Moat parachuted in to raise Farage’s credibility, the liar and fraud Marta Andreasen, Paul Nuttall forcing out Gregg Beaman etc. etc. The list is as long as UKIP’s history and just as corrupt!
You will also remember the esteem in which UKIP leadership hold their councillors from the belated and most perfunctory note of the untimely death of one of their few decent achievers Steve Povey and do note the fact that apart from a rather limp electoral circular they put no effort into retaining any of his seats despite having a willing candidate with public sympathy on his side as his son – UKIP lost EACH seat!
Labour ex-minister and former Staffordshire Moorlands MP Charlotte Atkins won a district council seat from Ukip at Leek North on aswitch of more than 19% since last May.Tory Neal Podmore gained Staffordshire’s Leek South division.These two seats became vacant after the death of a Ukip councillor who represented both of them.
Analysis of six comparable results suggest a projected 2% nationwide Labour lead over Conservative, the same margin calculated in aBBC survey of last May’s council polls.
This week’s line-up based on five wards fought both times by all three major parties is: C 36.1%, Lab 34.5%, Lib Dem 19.3%.
RESULTSHampshire County – Winchester Southern Parishes:
C 1661, Lib Dem 1038, Ukip 133, Green 130, Lab 124. (June 2009 – C 2625, Lib Dem 1232, Ukip 557, Lab 139). C hold. Swing 5.2% C to Lib Dem.
Northamptonshire County – Towcester:
Lib Dem 1279, C 638, Ukip 124, BNP 66. (June 2009 – C 1648, Lib Dem 760, Lab 293). Lib Dem gain from C. Swing 31.6% C to Lib Dem.
South Lakeland District – Windermere Town:
Lib Dem 418, C 85, Lab50, Ukip 20. (May 2011 – Lib Dem 537, C 117, Lab 114). Lib Dem hold. Swing 1.7% C to Lib Dem.
South Northamptonshire District – Towcester Brook:
Lib Dem 774, C401, Ukip 129. (May 2011 – Three seats Lib Dem 857, C 831, Lib Dem 811,C 785, 753, Lib Dem 645, Ukip 266, 178). Lib Dem gain from C. Swing 13.6% C to Lib Dem.
Staffordshire County – Leek South:
C 725, Ukip 556, Lab 432, Lib Dem 419, Moorlands Democratic Alliance 336, Ind 192. (June 2009 – Ukip 1766, C 1355, Lib Dem 905, Lab 470, Green 323). C gain FROM Ukip. Swing 7.4% Ukip to C.
Staffordshire Moorlands District – Leek North:
Lab 514, Ukip 188,C 178, Moorlands Democratic Alliance 33, Lib Dem 24 . (May 2011 – Threeseats Ukip 694, Lab 657, 527, C 423, Ukip 336, Ind 277, C 275, 170). Lab gain from Ukip. Swing 19.1% Ukip to Lab.
Suffolk County – Kesgrave and Rushmere St Andrews:
C 1302, Lab 804, Lib Dem 514. (June 2009 – Two seats C 2821, 2799, Lib Dem 1426, 1378, Lab 689, 546). C hold. Swing 13.2% C to Lab.
Suffolk Coastal District – Kesgrave East:
C 531, Lab 241, Lib Dem194. (June 2011 – Three seats C 1405, 1390, 1343, Lab 704, 606, Lib Dem561, Green 542, Lib Dem 443). C hold. Swing 3.3% Lab to C.
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:39:41 -0500 (EST)To: ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;Cc: ;Subject: Re: Constitution
Thanks for this David,The PEPP ballot was conducted after proper debate and the real UKIP Party voted against it quite rightly. I did say before the PEPP debate that we should see the new Constitution before we voted on the PEPP Issue.We are now in a situation where 90% of our members will not understand what it is all about when they vote. This is not good enough,Martin Harvey Chairman UKIP Broxbourne, member since 1995 or earler.In a message dated 10/02/2012 20:02:23 GMT Standard Time, email@example.com writes:From: David Nixon
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:02:04 +0000To: Michael Greaves; Robert Snare; Angela Scriven; J Lesingham; Ann Rapnik; firstname.lastname@example.org; S Martin
; Mrs B Fairweather; R Ness; James McCulloch; Chris French; John Buckley; Tony Stone; A Sheehan; M Lyon; Michael Bedford; Steve Richards; r shanks; garreth evans; email@example.com; J DICKER; steve harris; C Bridewell; Rose Lynden-Bell; christina latham; jill collin; Philip Pinto; Robert Cane; Celia Pilling; David M Black; Laurence Hughes; Steve Smith; Michael Wigley; Christopher Browne; I Davison; Jean Wisker; mark stroud; John Holt; Adrian Stevens; Victor Webb; R Ings; Gwendoline Girdwood; E Ashwell; Richard Squire; Mike; J Granata; Richard Crowder; Peter Lucas; M Day; Richard Scammell; P Collins Chairman; Dave Parker; Warwick Knowles; Philip Cork; firstname.lastname@example.org; Jenny Knight; John baxter; Peter Jenkins; Lesley Kelly; ralph gay; Duncan Richardson; John Knight; richard stanton; Charles Robertson; elizabeth burton; Peter Smith; David Salmon; John Harvey; P Milverton; Stephanie McWilliam; Guy Parfitt; Anthony McIntyre; C Mozley; S Guppy ; steve parker; C Allen; Dorothy Baker; Gaston Dezart; Ian Walsh; P Le Maistre; C Guyton; Alan James; email@example.com; J Gulleford; Martin Harvey; Christopher Streatfield; Helene Davies; peter reeve; George Curtis; Andrew Smith; Susan Smith; rex parkinson-hare; Cllr John Barry; Margaret King; charles lawman; Janet Culley; lisa duffy; John Youles; P Grimes; F Fox; Evan Heasley; Leon Stedman; JOHN BUTCHER; Marion Mason; Kerry Smith; W Mountford; Renie Price; Michael Stone; IAN SMITH; P Lancaster Chairman; P Sheehan; P Rowe; P Hughes; John Rawles; R Allen; peter cope; Cilla Bethell; J White; John Galloway; S Lewis; J Mabbott; M Lynch; steve povey; M Harold; A Illsley; L Wragg; Brett Parsons; I gardner; derek bennett; Jill Seymour; alan sheath; george lawson; Mark Starr; Barry Hodgson; C Humphries; Michael Wrench; H Reed; roy hopwood; Hamish Howitt; Michael Owen; J Mallinson; Brian Jarvis; T Commis; M Bayliss; S Noble; Neil Miney; robert willescroft; P Griffiths; P Gaskell; Chris Cassidy; Gary Robinson; Peter Cuddy; Frederick McGlade; Marie McNulty; Alan Freeman Wigan; Marlene Waddington; W Jenner; Christine Diamond; wjohnbailey; firstname.lastname@example.org; Martin Shelvey; M Watson; david coburn; Graham W. Mills; Maxine Spencer; Chisholm; James Bochsler; Philip Gordon; Vanessa Crichton; don ransome; C Swabey; David Rogerson; Peter Conquest; S Hassall; marilyn swain; Willem Veldhuizen; Nicholas Smith; m storier; A Hamilton; Jim Macarthur; Keith Marriott; Heather Ward; John Scutter; n robinson; B Pexton; S Hilson; jane collins; don ukip; J Upex; A Marsland; K Hordon; Peter Morgan; Nathan Clark Garbutt; Tim Veal; Tina Dowdall; Nigel James; Ian Bannister; Clive Easton; Gwyn Parry; Michael Squires; Barry Rogers; T Greaves; C Williams; F Wykes; NathanGill1@aol.com; margaret weatheritt; nigel coghill; Eric Wilson; D Cottrell; Alexis Fernandes; gordon parkin; martin bulmer; Henry Marshall; Richard Elvin; D Watters; G Norrie; P Adams; mark bekusch; Ross Durance; pete quick; Nathan Brittain; I Tyler; S Povey; C Lovatt; R Herbert; Ralph Berry; P Smith; I Tyres; K Sinclair; N Jukes; B Mahoney; J Lodder; B Hicks; Roger FowkesCc: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org ;Subject: RE: Constitution
When we have chosen candidates before and put them in order of preference for the E.U. elections along comes a person whom we have never heard of, who has never stood in an election for the party , who has never slogged round streets leafleting day after day, who was never a member of the party before the sudden parachuting in, etc.etc. to name but one, Kilroy-silk. I for one have had enough of this so called democratic party and am not rejoining. Borough Councill and Staffs County Councillor. David Nixon
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:30:33 +0100
From: Michael Greaves
To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; gOrgv@yahoo.co.uk; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; JAndEAshwell@talktalk.net; Richard@squire.org; M.Glennon@worthing.ac.uk; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Pmilverton@gmail.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Jgulleford@btinternet.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Feros@ferio.fsnet.co.uk; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Iancompat@blueyonder.co.uk; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; Lel034@aol.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; Mike.Arthur@talktalk.net; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; PowellHilarion@aol.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; Peter_Burkinshaw@hotmail.com; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
CC: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Dear Fellow UKIP membersThank you so much for writing in with your observations on the constitution.I respectfully disagree with your proposition and urge you to vote “YES” to this new document which is so important for the future of the Party.The proposition made is inaccurate as the new Constitution will NOT change candidate selection procedures. The candidate selection procedures will be the same whether or not the Constitution is passed.The relevant Rules permitting a Constituency Association to select from the Approved List are now within the Party’s Rules of Procedure, which states:B.5.1 It is the responsibility of branches to seek to nominate candidates for parliamentary and local elections within the branch area, acting in accordance with the rules laid down in Sections R,S,T,U and V of the Rules of Procedure.S.15 Only applicants on the national approved list may apply to a branch or Constituency Association for an adoption/hustings meeting.S.16 Adoption/hustings meetings shall be advertised so that all candidates on the Approved List have the right to apply for selection in any constituency.S.17 Constituency Associations or branches which fail to select candidates within the timescale in the PPC Selection Procedure may forfeit the right to select their candidates, with the responsibility being undertaken by the region.S.18 Where there is more than one applicant in a given constituency, an open hustings meeting must be held in accordance with the PPC Selection Procedure.S.19 In this event, the choice of candidate shall be made through a ballot in accordance with the PPC Selection Procedure.I suggest that these provisions make clear that the effect suggested is not in fact the reality.Yours sincerelyMichael GreavesParty Secretary
One must appreciate the irrefutable fact that UKIP leadership are ONLY interested in themselves and self enrichment using sock puppets as liars, cheats and cyber bullies as the only way they can retain office as clearly they do not do so on democratic principles or British values being in association with racists, anti Jewish, anti homosexual, Zionist scum of EU politics who advocate violence and murder as policy, gave words of succour to Anders Brevick subsequent to his vile xenophobic murder spree and as The EFD Group advocate EU membership and revision of the scam to suit their personal needs and greeds.
4.3.d does this apply to Lord Pearson?
4.9 Yet another paragraph giving undefined power to the NEC.
12.1.1 gives the NEC unlimited and undefined power concerning selection.
12.1.2 a clumsy way of preventing another Ashley Mote incident.
188.8.131.52 gives power to the NEC and away from the local constituency in
the selection of candidates.
Subject: Vote ‘No’ to the new Constitution
Sent: 08 February 2012 12:04
Cc: Dmrsec@Ukipberkshire. Co. Uk
Subject: New Constitution
You have probably received the latest “Independence” magazine with the new Constitution inside with your ballot papers to vote “yes” or “no”. I have had a long chat to some people within UKIP and I have been persuaded to vote NO and I am urging you to do the same.
I have been alerted that there are clauses in the new constitution which make it easier for UKIP to join a Pan-European party and therefore be given a great deal of “our” money to help the EU cause.
Also the membership vote for the Assembly List was re-jigged so the first 2 voted to the top of the list were put further down. I am not happy about this because this is not acceptable in a party purporting to be democratic.
I do hope you will agree with this and vote NO to the new constitution.
Kind regardsVanessa Crichton
Vanessa Crichton was the UKIP PPC for Hammersmith. It’s a constituency where Vanessa is also the Chairman of UKIP West London. it is claimed: Vanessa Crichton has built up West London UKIP despite the obstacles the likes of Wiffen have put in her place.
You may also find this article of interest: CLICK HERE
Such a pity UKIP has absolutely no idea of ethics, integrity or professionalism! As it keeps making abundantly clear.
Noting these facts and no doubt the utterly unprofessional total disregard of Farage’s placeman Michael Greaves in his desperate attempt to rebutt critics of the latest rewrite of UKIP Constitution in yet another attempt to legitimise what UKIP leadership already does when it rigs and fixes Party elections to suit themselves regardless of the wishes – even the votes of members!
Dear Party Secretary,
Thank you for your response. It would have been nice if the ‘Rules’ to which you refer had also been circulated to members.
However, as you know perfectly well mere ‘Rules of Procedure’ will always be inferior to the principal Constitutional document. If there is any conflict between the two, the Constitution will always prevail, as it so often does in the USA – where the Constitutional issue is always fought out in the final Court of Appeal.
Para B.5.1. of your Rules of Procedure allows branches to ‘nominate‘ candidates but not to decide. I believe that Regional Committees and Branches should have the ‘right to decide‘. Mere nomination to the NEC is a worthless prerogative for Regional and Branch committees because this Constitution transfers real powers of selection to the NEC.
I do not argue with your Paras S.15 to S.19 – but they make no difference to the central objection that the new Constitution cements the right of the NEC to determine who will be selected to represent UKIP in every region for Euro elections, and every constituency for Parliamentary and Local elections.
I regret to say that your response emphatically underlines my fears that UKIP Regional committees and Branch committees are no longer to be trusted to undertake the important role of selecting suitable candidates to represent the local community. Without trust you cannot expect the wholehearted support of grass root members to get behind their candidate. Without strong commited support at local level a candidate’s chance of election is dramatically impaired.
Central and South Derbyshire
Posted in David NIXON Cllr, Douglas DENNY, Martin Harvey, Michael GREAVES, Mick McGOUGH, Steve Povey, Steven Woolfe, UKIP Corruption, UKIP Rigged Elections, UKIPs Latest Constitution Scam | Leave a Comment »
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/02/2012
However he is not alone in not honouring his promises, employing family, doing more for himself and re-election than to Leave-The-EU, failing to produce transparent accounts and colluding in corruption!
I wonder what UKIP might have achieved if the garbage that has risen to the top had made the efforts and honoured their promises in the same way as Nikki Sinclaire see CLICK HERE.
I note Gerard Batten is spending public money with Nigel Farage’s authority (Farage controls UKIP directly) on harassing employees in Court and rushing around Police Stations trying to find a policeman who has heard of him or is sufficiently impressed by him being an MEP to make a fool of himself arresting them all at Junius and myself for publishing provable FACTS about him!
It seems Gerard Batten thinks he is not only important but so important that he should be allowed to suppress the truth and use his elected office to abuse people and the law!!!
I gather he is making much of some sort of secrecy injunction, he claims loudly to hold yet seems unwilling to publish, preventing publication of details about his defence made in open Court, when he was alleged to have acted racially and I gather in a manner likely to incite racial and religious hatred – or some such.
I gather he is also happy to tell lies for personal gain such as I have never writen about him until recently in my blogs which as you will see from CLICK HERE is a gross misrepresentation of the truth!
I gather he also tries to con people into believing he is NOT under investigation by OLAF despite the irrefutable evidence of an investigation and case numbers!
IF Gerard Batten has something to hide it seems he is making his position worse and not better by trying to hide the actual truth and the facts.
IF I am wrong on ANY of the FACTS I have published I do apologise and will publish the more accurate FACTS as soon as Gerard Batten provides and substantiates them!
It will be interesting to see his open and transparent accounts, and even more interesting to note whether, like Nikki Sinclaire, he can show an audited certificate showing he spent over £40K of his own money on the EUroSceptic cause.
A more extensive version of this statement of facts and queries will feature on some of my other blogs including The Gerard Batten blog at:
I do hope this establishes the facts and Gerard Batten contacts me with any additional facts he believes the electorate should know.
Personally I believe this jumped up little twerp is completely unfit for purpose and far more interested in self enrichment than ever he was interested in a policy of Leave-The-EU which he seems to use as a vehicle to preach his vile religious hatreds and fantasies whilst trying to subvert justice.
I believe Gerard Batten is utterly odious, clearly corrupt and far better suited to his previous job as a shop assistant in a BT Shop!
May I remind Gerard Batten that to date NO ONE has EVER shown that either my blog or Junius have EVER published a fact of any consequence that we were unable to substantiate. We try to not only check facts but require more than one source for controversial facts and as members of his own staff will tell you – IF they have the integrity – we endeavour to confirm or warn by direct contact!
Telling lies about me and others in abuse of a public office ill becomes an MEP – most of the slime that lies and attacks me does so as cowards with fake IDs because they are ashamed of their own behaviour.
I gather Gerard Batten has acted corruptly and in cowardice in complete arrogant abrogation of British concepts of Justice, behind my back, trying to manipulate others.
I also note Gerard Batten may bemoan Junius publishing FACTS about him but hasn’t the vaguest clue who comprises the Junius team – yet he wants to have ‘person or persons unknown to him’ arrested on his proven corrupt say so!
Gerard Batten is dragging the name of UKIP into the gutter he inhabits with vile liars and cheats like Mick McGough – Little wonder UKIP has failed to deliver on the agenda of Leave-The-EU over the years as they rife the gravy train selectively seeking to abuse their critics and more dedicated supporters who do NOT seek income or preferment on the gravy train but the right of self determination as an independent FREE peoples in these United Kingdoms.!
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 02/02/2012
I note with interest that Nikki Sinclairwe has brought her accounts up to date once more with an audit certificate and the transparency of publication on the internet.
I am pleased to note she has honoured her undertaking to be and remain fully transparent as she acquits her duties campaigning to Leave-The-EU on a high profile whilst doing much work in her constituency on local issues, particularly those withan EU angle to them.
Without a doubt Nikki Sinclaire has done far more for the EUroSceptic cause in her 2 years as an Indepencent MEP than has been done by UKIP MEPs and furthermore unlike UKIP MEPs her accounts have always been transparent and published.
For all UKIP’s promises regarding transparency and undertakings not to fund family we note their accounts are all too similar to the Dead Sea Scrolls – what little is published is unintelligible and we all know Batten, Bloom and Farage employ members of their families – Just as we know the liar and fraud David Bannerman of the Tory party employs a UKIP Regional Organiser and at least one other UKIP staff member!
Just as Stuart Gulleford of UKIP has employed his Mother and his son has an employed position with the odious NFU rep Stuart Agnew, shich is funded by virtue of UKIP!
UKIP MEPs have made it very clear they do not honour their promises!
To hear Gerard Batten’s employee Lawrence Webb formerly Regional Organiser castigating Boris Johnson and Red Ken for not honouring promises so as to try to be noticed in the EU’s London Regional Assembly posturings is clearly the hight of hypocracy but who would expect honesty, integrity or ethics from a team with a slime like the liar and cheat Mick McGough on it!
I look forward to UKIP cleaning up its act and publishing accounts one day but in the meantime here are those of Nikki Sinclaire:
Office management and running costs in particular heating and running costs (heating, lighting, insurance and cleaning)
The cost of purchasing or renting office equipment
Telephone, including mobile phone and postal charges
The cost of office supplies and stationery
The cost of purchasing books, periodicals and newspapers
The cost of using public data consultation networks
The expenses involved in equipping Members with communications equipment and maintaining that equipment, for example the purchase or rental of a telephone, a fax machine, a computer, a modem or communications card, a printer, other IT equipment, computer peripherals and software packages:
The cost of a subscription to the Internet and to
Hotel bills and other related expenses incurred in
travelling in a Member’s Member State of
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/01/2012
Little wonder with shinning examples like the low life liar Derek Clark and the cowards in their claque they have fielded such a lack luster array of nobodies & Farage chums for The London elections!
A list including such Party Luminaries as the liar, cheat and criminal spammer Mick McGough and I note Lawrence Webb has lost his job as Regional Organiser, could this be a last minuter effort to avoid prosecution by OLAF or some such?
it was interesting to note whilst watching The EU Parl Employment Committee that Nikki Sinclaire has not only been appointed as a full committee member as an Independent British MEP but has made her mark with a sound speech in debate whilst the racist anti Jewish pro EU membership EFD delegate, the UKIP MEP Derek Clark sat in lumpen silence looking as if he hadn’t a clue what was going on – neither making a speech nor any effort at intervention.
As a dishonest and corrupt liar Derek Clark is of course wrong footed by his lies about his fraud and attacks on individuals to cover up his incompetence and his criminal use of public money that recently led to him being ordered to repay a substantial amount of money, which he had purloined!
That The EFD made no intervention speaks volumes of their utter irrelevance as today shrinkage of The British economy was announced and builders in Wales werre warned to expect a further 4%^ shrinkage at least with no chance of any upturn before 2013 (there was no reason given for ANY upturn as banks continue to fail to lend money for house purchases in the expectation that property prices will continue to fall with the related collapse in employment).
Well done Nikki Sinclaire for actually making a speech to highlight the issues.
I note that in a long piece in The Western Morning News CLICK HERE The EFD MEP UKIP’s John Bufton was very briefly quoted relative to aid for Cornwall – The article which extensively quoted The Tory EUroSceptic George EUstace MP.
Considering just how corrupt MEPs are I note there is still no effort being made by the undeniably corrupt EU who are covering up the criminality of MEPs by refusing to publish The Galvin Report naming those whose criminality led to them being forced to repay money they had stolen. We hear this includes amongst others Nigel Farage but as ever he refuses to confirm or deny the widespread rumour – just as he failed to confirm that he had broken his promises to UKIP members and the electorate at large by paying his wife £30K a year in a dishonest act of self enrichment thought to be in compensation for his ‘errant’ behaviour!
This letter from the outgoing Tory MEP was interesting:
Subject: RE: THE ROBERT GALVIN REPORT
Dear [REDACTED]Thank you for your email. Please accept my apologies for the delay in my response to you. I have been liaising with my colleagues in the European Parliament regarding your concerns.The Galvin report was published in full in the European Parliament’s register for documents. As far as I am aware the names of the MEPs concerned were never actually in the report. It was an internal audit. For your information, any requests for documents to the Parliament’s register can be made via their online form:I understand that Marjory Van Den Broeke, Head of Press at the European Parliament, is the person who has been dealing with requests for these names as Parliament spokesperson. You may wish to contact Marjory Van Den Broeke.Thank you again for your correspondence.As you may be aware I will be standing down as MEP for the West Midlands on 4th February 2012. In the case that your correspondence is still outstanding, written permission is required from you for the matter and your details to be passed on to my successor.Yours sincerely,Liz Lynne MEP
This would be far more impressive had her resignation as an MEP been on ethical grounds rather than as it seems to provide for ‘Buggins’ Turn’ particularly when the Buggins in question is the next on the Tory list.
Not quite as corrupt as LibDim. MEP Diane Wallis where the particular Buggins she stands aside for is the next on the list – Her husband!
An interesting thread has materialised on The UKIP controlled and utterly dishonest Anthony Butcher’s blog with the dishonest and cowardly UKIP claque trying to defend The EFD position over Gibraltar when we understand Nigel Farage is still far from welcome in Gibraltar after some deal involving an alleged £800,000 of timber!!!
I note one of The EFD supporters a low life too ashamed to use his name has deliberately misquoted Niall Warry to try to distort the facts to present his/UKIP’s dishonest spin. Again and again the cowards in UKIP like Independent UKIP, Gothmog, Skeptyk, SDP and the like hide their lies behind anonymity having never ONCE identified a single solitary consequential inaccuracy or effort to mislead in any of my postings – but we all know bullies and liars are usually cowards.
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 19/01/2012
Amongst other FACTS is that a man is often judged by his associates!!
I am sure that many of you will realise just how damaging it is for UKIP to be members of the extreme anti Jewish, racist, violent and anti homosexual EFD – even if it does enrich Nigel Farage as its leader which he seems willing to be whatever revolting members he is willing to accept to keep his numbers up for the extra income!
An unfortunate bit of ‘photoshop’ fun that someone circulated long ago does seem to have more than just a whisper of truth to it – Batten’s apparent incitment of racial hatred founded it seems on his personal fear of Islam as a threat to his chosen superstitions has all the redollence of fascism and the religious insecurity and obscene behaviour of German fascists!Batten is of course not alone as shown by the Zionist extremism of the then puppet leader of UKIP Malcolm Pearson as featured by the press or the anti homosexuality of Godfrey Bloom and the bullying and lies of Malcolm Pearson, Godfrey Bloom, Nigel Farage amnd others relative to Nikki Sinclaire it all looks rather too much as if Batten reflects UKIP leadership!
It can not help Gerard Batten’s Court apearances facing accusations of racism, harassment, abuse and what seems to be dishonest claims!
Nor can it help that he pays his brother for work out of the expenses he gets for representing UKIP members.
The posting at CLICK HERE must be proving almost as embarrassing to him as being associated with low lifes like the proven liar, cheat and criminal spammer Mick McGough with what seems like a sad case of OCD.
Todays revalations and the various links at CLICK HERE must be making Gerard Batten’s squalid behaviour all too likely to be found against in COURT!
For further understanding of the depth of the problems Gerard Batten seems to have CLICK HERE then consider all the additional evidence at CLICK HERE The huge amount of evidence and the many links, as regularly provided by this blog and also for that matter those who post at Junius again and again shows UKIP to be unfit for purpose – largely due to the self enrichment, self interest and lies of its all too scuzzy leadership team who have NEVER shown one iota of professionalism and have surrounded themselves with biddable low lifes and criminals!
Despite employing liars & scum like Mark Croucher, Annabelle Fuller, John Ison, Mick McGough, Peter Reeve, Marta Andreasen etc. – thieves like Tom Wise, John Ison, Annabelle Fuller, Derek Clark, Clive Page, Stuasrt Agnew, David Bannerman and the like – not to mention the likes of Graham Booth, Nigel Farage, Derek Clark, Jeffrey Titford who have already been ordered to repay sums they had misappropriated from the public purse – Gerard Batten’s associates do little to make his claims seem credible.
Let us also remember the many liars and low lifes acting in a cowardly manner as they lie and seek to defame whilst hidden buy false names like Skeptic, Independent UKIP, Ranger 121, Gothmog and others, plus those with no reputation worthy of upholding like Paul Nuttal, Anthony Butcher, Gerard Batten, Godfrey Bloom, Stuart Gulleford, Mick McGough, Mark Croucher, Brendan Padmore, Stuart Agnew, Tom Wise etc. all too willing to lie and misrepresent – Clearly untrustworthy, self serving and beneath contempt.
Despite the serial dishonesty of UKIP whose unprofessional and incompetent leadership have never once publicly censured the trash amongst them for their sordid behaviour we note NEVER ONCE have any of these garbage shown that either this blog, me personally or those at Junius have EVER ONCE lied, misled or dishonestly misrepresented UKIP or any of the liars, low lifes and self serving trash who form their leadership and its claque!
Again I remind readers that there would be no point in publishing this blog if it was not provably founded on FACTS – I also remind readers that never ONCE has it been shown that I deliberately misled ANYONE nor culpably lied, also do remember that IF I were to get a single solitary fact, however minor, wrong I do not skultk in cowardly anonymity but publish my identity, my phone number, my eMail address and postal address so that IF a correction was apposite all you need to do is contact me and the correction AND an apology will be published where apposite if required!
I have made THREE minor corrections of minor errors of fact in the many 1,000s of blogs I have written and those 3 errors are still clearly shown. ALL my postings are in MY name and attributed – for a short time I published a blog FOR someone which was NOT mine, nor MY comments, but that was removed when I published corrections which THEY wished dishonestly to hide and I no longer have anything to do with their blog.
All postings I have made have been in MY name and I have NEVER despite the lies of some in UKIP been paid one cent to publish ANYTHING!
So having proved MY honesty and integrity it would be interesting to see if ANY of UKIP could do likewise! Clearly those I have exposed could not!
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/01/2012
As regular readers of my blogs which are consistent in their support of UKIP members & the founding principles of UKIP – NEVER ONCE have the low lifes and cowards that seemingly form UKIP’s Leadership and the cowards & liars of their claque ahown a single solitary second of support, by me, for The EU, for theirs or anyone elses corruption and lies!
Nor has a single solitary posting I have EVER made been shown to be untrue, misleading or a lie in ANY material way – unlike their frequent lies and dishonest self serving spin!
Wolfman McGough about to send yet another email to his ‘love’We note that the Wolfman ‘Failed London Mayoral Candidate’ McGough has been showing increasing signs of mental derangement and instability. He has, of course, always been slightly unhinged but he appears to have got much worse over the last few weeks. McGough is now a man obsessed. And who are the subjects of this obsession? ……. None other than Greg Lance-Watkins and his wife.The Wolfman has been sending thousands of emails to the couple every month. Hundreds are sent on a daily basis! Some messages state that McGough has been receiving strange phone calls from someone claiming to a ‘homosexual former airline mogul with a knighthood’. See picture blow. Click on it for a clearer view. Another example of the McGough’s mental breakdown?Many of the emails ask why GLW is ignoring him. It reminds one of a lovesick teenager who can’t accept that the object of his desire is just not interested. Indeed, many of the messages are addressed to ‘Dearest Greg’ and end with the words ‘yours as ever’. So has the Wolfman reached a crisis point in his life? We hear that his marriage is less than perfect. Is he now so unsure of his sexuality that he sees GLW as a potential partner? McGough has even sometimes featured a picture of GLW as his avatar on the British Democracy Forum! Such is love! So when is the Wolfman going to come out of the closet?Or does McGough swing both ways? Other emails carry love messages to Lee, GLW’s wife, bearing the word ‘babes‘ or ‘Lee baby’. We wonder what McGough’s wife thinks about this?
To view the original on the Junius Team blog CLICK HERE
In passing it is abundantly clear that despite his posturings and idiocy Mick McGough and thus it seems UKIP’s other executives haven’t a clue who is or is not a member of The Junius Team, they make little more than fools of themselves with their fatuous guesses and sly hints.
It is also abundantly clear that Mick McGough is a dishonest and corrupt individual prepared to lie and cheat for his personal gain CLICK HERE and without the integrity, ethics or basic morality to apologise when shown to be dishonest and corrupt – A low life, beneath contempt whose support for UKIP and his claims of EUroScepticism are hugely damaging to the peoples of these United Kingdoms and our fight for liberty and self determination as an independent sovereign nation.
To view the original article CLICK HERE
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 02/01/2012
ADDITION 00:25hrs. 03-Jan-2012
Is there ANYONE of Consequence, Gravitas & probity Left in UKIP!
There can’t be or they would clean out the garbage and seek to work for these United Kingdoms and Liberty not just prostitute themselves and the party for personal gain!
Hello,Re lying Mick – please find attached Open Europe Transparency Report from May 2009 where his beloved boss admits employing family memberRe Paul Diamond, Batten’s barrister, only Counsel in UK with judicial warning for ‘dealings in travesty of reality’ using ‘extravagant rhetoric in his skeleton arguments’ and using ‘arguments which are to speak plainly simply wrong to the factual premises on which they are based’ – words of Lord Justice Munby and Mr Justice Beatson in R (Eunice Johns and Owen Johns) v Derby City Council with Intervener Equality and Human Rights Commission  EWHC 375 (Admin) (28 February 2011). Same judges also warn that Diamond has a habit of trying to mislead Courts and that Diamond has used similar rhetoric before Laws LJ in McFarlane v Relate Avon Limited  EWCA Civ 880,  IRLR 872, as well as Court of Appeal in Islington Borough Council v Ladele (Liberty intervening)  EWCA Civ 1357,  1 WLR 955Re Batten v Islam – he was speaker at the very first CounterJihad Conference in Brussels in 2007 that led to formation of Anti Sharia network in US as well as anti Islam movement in Europe and formation of EDL nutters in UK (attached). His ‘A Proposed Charter of Muslim Understanding’ is formative document for these Neo Nazis.Also I don’t know if you are aware but Searchlight Magazine (one which exposes Nazis and racists has written in its March edition about Batten and Alan Lake) http://theenglishdefenceleagueextra.blogspot.com/2011/03/nick-lowles-searchlight-alan-lake-is.html Also Alan Lake (Deputy Leader of EDL and chief financier) uses Batten’s texts (stupidities) to galvanise EDL via his web page http://4freedoms.ning.com. They are so closely connected that they are raising funds in US with Tennessee Freedom Coalition (US nutters) for Tommy Robinson AKA Stephen Yaxley Lennon, Leader of EDL for his legal fundhttp://barthsnotes.com/2011/11/13/christian-concern-makes-new-link-at-nashville-anti-islam-conference/. Diamond visited them in November. Obviously journalists have found out about this and asked liar Farage in Guardian but instead of admitting what they are up to he simply lied and tried to say ‘UKIP will abolish UKIP Burqa Policy’.It seems that any cause that come with any money (even religious nutters money and/or Nazi money) is more important than anything to do with British withdrawal from EU.
That a member of UKIP NEC can so readily publicise the irrefutable fact that he is so ill informed and willing to demean UKIP, with his embarrassing and childish rush to conclusions, without an iota of factual understanding, no doubt explains why UKIP is considered so untrustworthy and why the party does so consistently badly in domestic elections; clearly he is far from being the only dishonest and corrupt fool in UKIP leadership as their behaviour shows.
Perhaps someone can tell me who came 2nd. Let alone 3rd. and 4th. In the 100yards in any Olympics since Jesse Owen or even gained any place but first in any event since the war!
Who cares who the also rans are when clearly there are clearly drawn lines for first and second and even the LibDims as 3rd. count for nothing of any consequence beyond makeweights for the Tories!
But do permit me the excentricity of proving my own argument wrong by reminding others of the days when John Tindall on behalf of his National Front constantly banged on about being the FOURTH largest party in British politics and surges in the electoral polls. No doubt a style Farage learned from his Father who was, I understand, a member and their old family friend Buster Mottram who against all advice Nigel Farage insisted was brought into the party!
The future of UKIP seems all too likely to emulate that of The NF (for clarity National Front NOT Nigel Farage!) – destroyed by its own leadership squabbles and its extremist, violent, racist and xenophobic fellow travellers.
ADDITION 00:25hrs. 03-Jan-2012
I was amused by the comment of Niall Warry – he has always struggled in his busy day to follow many of my blogs and as one can see from his own postings he is more attuned to brevity, though his comments do tend to have consistent verity.
Mick McGough on the other hand makes something of a fool of himself, as ever!:
Mick McGough’s offensive and demeaning reply:
If you ,who is very close to GLW cannot follow his delirious rants how are we expected too?Clearly his medication is having a serious effect on his writings,never noted for accuracy,spelling or good English.He is clearly desperate to maintain his output in order to continue receiving the President’s EUros.One has to admire a man who writes lies for money and who marries to protect the same.Perhaps GLW should limit his output to the up cycle of his bipolarity.
Minded that McGough is presenting as a UKIP NEC member and a lead candidate for the EU’s London Assembly and has lied and cheated his colleagues to be selected as an MEP candidate for UKIP it is a measure of their desperation that he makes such a fool of himself and thus UKIP!
Let us consider his silly comment:
If you ,who
Should this not be – If you, who – as it is customary to place the comma after the word and NOT immediately preceding the following word!
is very close to GLW cannot follow his delirious rants
Pray enlighten – in what way does he claim ‘delerious’ – it is he who is the proven liar, seeks election, fantasises and leaps to utterly inaccurate conclusions whilst using dishonest and defamatory slurs. It is Mick McGough that sends offensive eMail spam in the 1,000s to my anti virus spam blocker and so demeans those he claims to represent – yet he gratuitously and without a shred of foundation rushes to show his lack of comprehension of medicine and diagnostics!
how are we expected too?Clearly
Might McGough have meant ‘to’ and surely spaces would help to make him look less foolish!
his medication is having a serious effect on his writings,never noted for accuracy,spelling or good English.
Perhaps Mick McGough in his haste and exuberant obsession has no understanding of the use of the space bar on his keyboard for when he is inconsistent and uses it for a change he places the spaces in the wrong places!
Some indication of the medication he fantasises over might help as I take none other than a rather strong mouth wash as I have a seriously damaged imune system as a result of my cancer and am thus prone to infection and ulcers.
He is clearly desperate to maintain his output in order to continue receiving the President’s EUros.
To keep repeating his dishonest fantasies would seem to be convincing the poor obsessive but he has proved he lacks both the honour, integrity and self respect to support his lies and demeaning comments with fact or evidence – That even The Fourth largest Party in British politics considers this to be anything other than sound reason for de-selection of such a fool speaks volumes of the desperation and lack of professionalism in UKIP!
One has to admire a man who writes lies for money
Again I challenge Mick McGough to show a single solitary lie amongst the many 1.000s of blogs I have published and Forum contributions I have made – Yet5 again this grubby little man will run and hide, bombarding my spam filter with more childish postings and hide behind his own dishonesty unable to show an instance where I have lied as he claims – when it is a proven and public fact that he is a liar and a cheat, a low life and a blight on humanity seekimng reward yet willing to act against the interests of EUroRealism and UKIP on a serial basis.
Michael McGough you are not only a liar but clearly damaging to UKIP amd the ethics of these United Kingdoms – without honour, integrity or ethics.
Not even man enough to apologise for your odious behaviour and reprehensible dishonesty.
and who marries to protect the same.
McGough not only makes a fool of himself with such comments but that UKIP endorse such vile comments by failure to sanction him as a member of their executive he demeans UKIP and those he pretends to represent.
Perhaps GLW should limit his output to the up cycle of his bipolarity.
Another lie, another unethical dishonesty another desperate effort to defame – Mick McGough you are beneath contempt.
Provide your evidence or be man enough to apologise and withdraw from UKIP so as not to further damage their sick and ailing Party.
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/12/2011
possibly the most damning thing about UKIP at the moment is the serial dishonesty and openly held self interest & fantasies of Mick McGough on public forums – where as a member of the UKIP clique seeking agrandisement and enrichment he makes a fool of himself with his unsustainable dishonesty, personalised attacks and inability to convince anyone but himself.
Mick McGough endlessly postures and pretends to know who the members of The Junius team are and it is clear he hasn’t a clue!
Mick McGough makes a spectacular fool of himself having spam mailed me with some 17,000 offensive, puerile and childish eMails, which my anti virus & spam screen have detected and dumped unread – this sort of behaviour from a member of UKIP’s claque and inner team on the NEC so demeans the Party!
Then we have this proven liar making accusations of dishonesty against me and substantiating his claim by proving my comment! He states that I lied when I made the comment he works for Gerard Batten and then in the same paragraph he admits to working for UKIP London which is effectively Gerard Batten – the poor man is an idiot!
We then see him trying to show how clever he is by pointing out that he doesn’t work for Gerard Batten and that the authorisation of an order for printing (as I recall) which I published showing that Gerard Batten‘s brother was working for Gerard Batten was in some way misleading which I admit was beyond me to understand!
Defending the indefensible seems a habit in UKIP management!
Many will remember that Nigel Farage gave solemn undertakings on TV that no one in UKIP would employ relatives and when it became clear he was employing his own wife aty £30K and published in The Sunday Times it then started to be clear others were doing likewise!
Godfrey Bloom was employing family members; Graham Booth was trying to kline up family members with cushy jobs on the EU gravy train, seemingly mistresses were on the payroll,; Gerard Batten was employing his brother; Stuart Gulleford had employ7ed his Mother on Jeffrey Titford’s behalf, now I note he has found his son a job working for Stuart Agnew; Lisa Duffy whilst an employee and NEC member lacked the professionalism to prorogue herself when votes were taken that effected her live in boyfriend – Need I go on?
Whilst the self serving shower of unprofessional fools in UKIP carry on their largely irrelevant self destruction the real world goes on!
There seems no sign that UKIP has noticed this EU wide event that hands ultimate control and dictatorial powers to the unelected bureaucrats of the EU central committee!
Having made much of his pretence that he has the vaguest clue that he knows who is on The Junius team would Mick McGough be so good as to justify what I believe to be a lie or apol;ogise and withdraw his defamatory and insulting claims.
Likewise I call on Mick McGough to publish a public apology for his lies and offensive behaviour in his official capacity where he is known by all to be a member of the UKIP NEC & leadership team and his behaviour and dishonesty demeans the party and undermines the honest members.