Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

Archive for the ‘Plebs’ Category

Police Abuse of Power Redolent of Nikki Sinclaire’s 29 Months on Bail!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 19/08/2014

Police Abuse of Power Redolent of Nikki Sinclaire’s 29 Months on Bail!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
 
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
 
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Police Abuse of Power Redolent of Nikki Sinclaire’s 29 Months on Bail showing the intimidatory arogance and hubris and the slovenly style of policing so common in Police States!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
 
Hi,
 
it is sad to note the collapse in ethics and behaviour of Britain’s police services, once the envy of the world!
 
The main article below is all too similar to the standards of ethics and integrity of police forces in third world police states wher over equipped police waddle around full of their own importance, with a lack of understanding that they are NOT the servants of the state but of the people!
 
That policiong standards are in free fall in Britain are all too apparent one need only note the 30 or so police murders by armed police executing citizens when in Britain, rightly or wrongly, there is no death penalty!
 
Ignoring the more vile cases of abuse permit me to lead examples similar to that in the article of which I am all too well aware:
 
Consider the case of Nikki Sinclaire MEP for the West Midlands until the recent election, she was arrested on the pretext of allegations regarding supposed missuse of expenses based on what seemed all too apparently to be the lies of John Ison who having been dismissed would seem to have burgled her office and stolen confidential paperwork. Nikki Sinclaire was held on bail for 29 months in which she wasnot questioned in any detail by police yet it was acceptable for the corrupt in UKip to constantly make accusations regarding her status leading to great damage to any campaign for re-election. Was this just shoddy policing or even more seriously a case of corrupt or political policing for it is certain it proved the addage that ‘ Justice delayed is Justice denied’!
 
Then there is my own experience where based on toltally dishonest lies from the UKip MEP Gerard Batten I was ordered to apear at Chepstow Police Force or be arrested to surrender to about 3 hours of cross examination under caution – it was clear that the local police were acting at the demand of The Metropolitan Police, which the local police confirmed.
At the end of the interview, when it was clear there was absolutely no case to answer merely efforts to contrive a claim based on lies and misrepresentations, unsubstantiated by any evidence, from Gerard Batten.
To this date, sojme two years, I have received no appology nor any further comment from the police on the matter – neither appologising for their gul;libility nor for their shoddy behaviour.
 
The Police then make complaint that many consider them to be little more than a rabble of over paid, over pensioned plebs and bemoan the fact they no longer receive the support of the people they serve! Little wonder.
 
Then there is the case of a friend of mine who moved from London, closing his successful business to relocate to the North West where he set up with his wife and child as an Independent Teacher and academic coach. Suddenly his home was raided and his teaching material and computers were seized – then came rumours and allegations that his computers were being searched for child pornography – thus ensuring the collapse of his new business.
Some 2 years later his computers were returned to him with no further action! The police, seemingly acting in collusion with the interests of a local dignatary were only too willing to destroy an innocent man’s business and risk his marriage, his health and his family!
 
I feel sure that at least 50% of thinking readers of this article can easily think of similar examples of which they know – not just the well publicised murders, never challenged or the abuse of public figures!

Long-term bail allows lazy police and prosecutors to leave cases to gather dust

Where are the checks and balances to make sure power isn’t being abused?

There is a story, possibly apocryphal, that when Andrew Mitchell unearthed evidence that he had been “framed” by Downing Street police, he wanted to make a statement saying: “This is outrageous. How can the police do this to me? I am Cabinet minister.”

But after he was persuaded by an astute colleague to alter it, he said: “If this can happen to a senior minister, then what chance does a youth in Brixton have?”

I was struck by this distinction last week in relation to a different police investigation of which, indirectly, I had knowledge. It concerns a journalist, a friend of mine, who was arrested as part of the Metropolitan Police’s phone hacking investigation.

I have been outraged at how he has been treated, and, while he is a friend, I think there is a wider issue of public concern.

The basic facts are these: in 2012 the Times journalist Patrick Foster was accused during the Leveson Inquiry of “hacking” into an email account run by an anonymous police blogger three years before in 2009.

He was said to have used the “hack” to identify the blogger – which resulted in the policeman being identified. Furthermore Mr Foster was accused of providing a misleading statement to the High Court when the policeman tried to take out an injunction to stop his name being published. Such allegations were bound to come to the attention of the police and rightly so. But the manner in which they conducted their investigation should be unacceptable in any society governed by the rule of law.

After the allegations became public Mr Foster wrote a letter to the police promising to answer any questions. They confirmed it was “highly likely” that they would want to speak to him and would “make arrangements as necessary”.

Seven months later those “arrangements” turned out to be a dawn raid at his home. He was interviewed under caution and placed on police bail and told to return several months hence to find out if he was to be charged.

At the time, Mr Foster was working as a freelance journalist – and that work quickly dried up under the suspicion. When he returned to the police station he was bailed again for several more months. Then again. Then again.

That went on for two years during which time he was unable to work or plan and had to wait every three months to find out if he were to face charges.

It was not a complicated case; all the information was in the public domain or available to the police before his arrest. At no stage has he been given any explanation for the delay.

Last week the police offered him a caution for committing a technical breach of the Computer Misuse Act. He still maintains he was innocent and believes that if he had rejected it no charges would have followed.

So why does this matter? How does it pass the Brixton test? Well, because last year around 3,000 other people were held on police bail for one to three years. There are no time limits, no judicial oversight and no proper checks and balances on the police to make sure power is not being abused.

It allows lazy police and prosecutors to leave cases to gather dust. It allows a form of punishment by default, even though we believe in the principle of innocent until proven guilty. And in any civilised society that has to be unjust.

To go back to Andrew Mitchell, this is not about special pleading for journalists (or politicians). It is an issue that should concern us all and needs to be urgently addressed.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
 
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
 

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
 
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
 
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
 
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Nikki SINCLAIR, Plebs, Police, Police State, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

 
%d bloggers like this: