Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
#187* – Little BERTTIE HITT’s CONFESSIONS Of Support For Corruption
Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
LITTLE BERTTIE HITT THROWS HIS TOYS OUT OF HIS PRAM WHEN CAUGHT OUT!
Hi,
an interesting letter has surfaced from Bert Hitt that throws much light on Our Article on this blog – interestingly a letter we have already published on this blog from Gollom shows that Bert Hitt is more than a little short of the truth – well lets be fair – Gulleford has supplied us with a letter from his office which indicates Ian Smith and little Berttie were not at the meeting for the reasons they pretend to!
From: Bert Hitt
40 Raven Close
Mildenhall
Bury St Edmunds
Suffolk
IP28 7LF
To: Mr D. Hudson
Newmarket,
Suffolk
CB8 0BS
Dear Dave
As myself and (George Hayes are Mildenhal Parish Councillors we have been heavily ,
involved on behalf of the public, opposing our Parish Council with our Registration Application of the Jubilee Field (Recreation Ground.), to prevent a car park being built on it to enable Sainsburys to build a Supermarket in Mildenhall. Naturally our registration under the Commons Act 2006 has been opposed by the Parish Council and Sainsburys, this has incurred us a considerable amount of hours preparing our case replying to opposition statements for what looks like a public hearing.
Sorry I am clearly missing something.
Start by reading the Returning Officer’s 9 page OFFICIAL report on the corruption, particularly in the Eastern Region the full text can be found here
I agree totally – that EUkip faiiled to respond to correct the issue when it was passed on by John West to the relevant officer in EUkip who did absolutely NOTHING to rectify the corruption left John West in the embarrassing position that either he acquitted his Civic Duty (something that you as a Councillor would I presume uphold) or colluded in a crime after the event which is a criminal action!
What would YOU have done – especially as a responsible EUkip member and an elected Councillor – before we hear more criticism your answer would be appreciated. Would you have acted honestly or in a criminal manner?
Your grubby little inuendo that John West acted BECAUSE he was not selected is a lie – I have details of correspondence back to October LAST YEAR showing he was taking actions to clean up EUkip.
Further you will be aware that Titford & the ghastly Gulleford were using EUkip money to directly corrupt the selection process back in February this year.
May I suggest you check your facts in future like a good little parish councillor as it besmirches your civic office to bear false witness.
I like others felt this was a deplorably damaging act by going to the police in the first place with an alleged claim with no proof causing it to become public knowledge. I understand the police have found nothing illegal and have since dropped the case.
Well little Berttie Werttie Hittie Wittie rather than try to belittle an honest man who has done something that took courage I do not have any reason to believe you might have let us see if you are man enough to make an open and public apology for your underhand behaviour.
Let us consider that John West has the great good fortune of a strong willed and competent wife – is it jealousy that you have a dull meatball as a wife that leads you to insult another man’s wife, or are you like the lead candidate in the region unable/unfit to drive AND without a wife.
What are the great qualifications YOU have to offer that you are just a footling little parish councillor! What qualifications has the liar, fraud and cheat Bannerman to offer as an unmarried serial failure in the Tory party without social graces or confidence a dull speaker who can’t even get a job without telling lies about his utterly irrelevant ancestry. A little chappie who hasn’t had a proper job for years and lives in a little flat in Acton between two railway lines. A man who has sold out ALL his principles and has taken The EU’s 30 pieces of silver as an employee!
Would you rather consider Andrew Smith whose total lack of professionalism as an accountant and irresponsibility has landed EUkip with a Guilty verdict in the Courts and still might, subject to Judicial Review coast EUkip between £1/2 & 1 Million.
Or the qualifications of the bullying buffoon Stuart Agnew who considers the position is his by right as he has effectively bought it.
Let us see if you are man enough to apologise for your outrageous and gratuitous misrepresentation of John West.
Be minded that John West out of loyalty to UKIP and his principles not only organised two conferences for the party despite attempts of the dishonest like Gulleford & Titford to sabotage them!! He also was willing to put up his and his wife’s money to gain experience and raise his profile for The General Election by hopefully getting a foot on the selection ladder.
He did not expect to be cheated and was happy to lose fairly, but with little Berttie Werttie corrupting the elections with other cheats and with EUkip willing to sponsor criminality being an honest man he stood little chance.
As an elected member of a team you would seem to have abrogated on your duty in that team and now, rather late in the day, seek to pass the blame to your elected colleague. As a councillor even if only of some footling parish council you will be aware such offices are a matter of teamwork – what did YOU do to inculcate meetings? Also you may not have noticed having clearly never done anything serious or responsible in life and clearly nothing honest – it is the norm that The Chairman & Secretary agree the detail and the Secretary effects the functionary duty of organisation.
Recently you phoned me to tell me about a group of chairmen of branches had got together and formed this Nemarket Declaration Group to challenge the judgement of the Selection Committee, I immediately asked you if this had anything to do with John West, if so, I was opposed to it. ‘The impression I got was that you are one of the ringleaders and had voted on behalf of the branch without calling a meeting which upset Ian and George when I told them.
May I point out that having already decided, before coming, that you were opposed and having admitted you orchestrated opposition with no knowledge of the facts you woul of course, as Ian Smith’s second, claim the pre-rehearsed plan was ‘reasonable’
You will note that of the well over 175 postings in this CaterpillarsAndButterflies series there is not a single solitary one which is sufficiently inaccurate that EUkip believe that they can demand I correct it – such that being dishonest cowards they act in an underhand manner and threaten the weak and those without morality or understandings of ethics to prevent publication of the truth as with the weak and cowardly Anthony Butcher who seemingly will do anything to assist Farage and his corrupt associates – much, it seems, as would you little Berttie.
If it is your determinance to continue to support corruption and the lies of EUkip then may I suggest your resignation might well be an intelligent act towards cleaning up EUkip.
Bert Hitt.
c.c Jeffrey TitfordlStuart Gulleford.
c.c Peter Reeve
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU
Ukip-vs-EUkip 