Donald Trump & Arron Banks The Tory Backer who switched to supporting Nigel Farage’s Ukip! Just how inept is Donald Trump?
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
for some understanding of why the British Government is unwilling to involve Nigel Farage in negotiations regarding BreXit and even less interested in his being linked with discussions with Britain’s discussions with POTUS elect Donald Trump may be gleaned from the first article below:
‘Spy MP’ helped Russian woman in mafia inquiry
Documents show that Mike Hancock involved himself so closely in the case of the second woman that he hand-delivered a letter to her
Daniel Foggo Published: 12 December 2010
Hancock’s parliamentary assistant Katia Zatuliveter is in detention awaiting deportation (Chris Ison)
A Liberal Democrat MP whose parliamentary assistant has been accused by MI5 of being a spy intervened to stop another young Russian woman being deported. She was being investigated by Special Branch detectives over possible links to the Russian mafia.
Documents seen by The Sunday Times show that Mike Hancock involved himself so closely in the case of the second woman that he hand-delivered a letter to her, confirming her permission to remain in Britain. Her husband at the time, whom she had married to stay in the country, has accused Hancock of having designs on his wife.
Hancock’s parliamentary assistant, Katia Zatuliveter, 25, is in detention awaiting deportation. MI5 believes she is an agent of the SVR, the Russian intelligence service.
The scandal has threatened to escalate into a full-blown diplomatic incident, with the Russian embassy insisting she is not an agent, and has raised questions over whether Hancock was compromising himself by becoming overly involved with young, attractive Russian women. Ekaterina Paderina, then aged 25, married Eric Butler, then 54, in 1998 within months of meeting him in Portsmouth, where Hancock is an MP. Butler said he was questioned by Special Branch in 1999.
“There were concerns about whether Ekaterina was in the country for legitimate reasons,” said Butler, now 66 and a retired ship steward.
Another source, who knew Butler and his wife, said he was also questioned by a Special Branch officer about Paderina.
“It wasn’t her specifically that Special Branch were interested in; she was merely a cog in what they were looking at,” said the source. “To put it very bluntly, they were looking at a Russian mafia connection to Portsmouth.”
Butler said he realised shortly after his wedding that Ekaterina had married him only so as to remain in Britain. Despite the marriage, the authorities made attempts to return her to Russia, and the couple approached Hancock for help. Butler said he quickly developed reservations over involving Hancock.
“I could see him looking at her in his office in a certain way,” he said. “One day I came home and found them both in the conservatory, and Ekaterina had her legs positioned in a way which was very provocative and Hancock was leaning forward in his chair. I got angry and told him I would thump him if he didn’t get out.”
Hancock wrote letters on Paderina’s behalf to Barbara Roche, the immigration minister at the time, supporting her application to stay in Britain.
An entry in Paderina’s diary in September 1999, seen by The Sunday Times, stated: “Mike Hancock arrived, we had a chat, he gave me a letter which said that I have been granted another visa for a year. Immediately it was like having a huge weight taken off my shoulders.”
After being divorced by Butler in 2001, Paderina quickly remarried another British man. Paderina, now 37 and with the married name Banks, said she had no knowledge of Special Branch’s interest in her. She denied ever having had an inappropriate relationship with Hancock and said she could not remember a confrontation between Butler and the MP in their house.
Of her relationship with Butler, she insisted their marriage had been “valid” but added: “I didn’t marry Eric Butler for love.”
Asked if her motive in marrying him was to stay in Britain, she said yes.
Hancock denied having behaved improperly with Paderina. He admitted writing letters on her behalf but denied any knowledge of police involvement.
When told of Paderina’s diary entry, he said: “I might have dropped off a letter at their house but I was certainly never in their house. I’m not that stupid.”
To view the original of this article CLICK HERE To view this article as I first published 12-Dec-2010 CLICK HERE
Now consider just why Nigel Farage and his motley crew may not be perceived by Donald Trump in quite the same manner as their ambitions, spin and self publicity may be perceived!
That Donald Trump has been duped into consorting with these dubious individuals is potentially, in fact may already be, a reasonable cause for ire on his part – if it is not and he subsequently realises just how much his aids and allies have failed him that anger could be wider spread.
On the other hand if Donald Trump genuinely & wittingly chose to consort with these individuals it is a very poor reflection on him and should be of great concern to the American peoples who elected him as POTUS Elect and the world at large as it reflects attrocious judgement.
Such poor judgement may well be a clear justification of the lampooning article below as clearly Donald Trump has been duped into perceiving Nigel Farage as Mr. BreXit when he clearly had little or nothing to do with achieving BreXit and has consistently failed (8 times) to gain elected office in British domestic politicsdespite riding a populist band waggon.
Let us not forget Nigel Farage did all he could to prevent a Referendum on whether Britain left or remained in the EU – He did absolutely nothing to oppose the new EU Constitution subsequently enacted as The Lisbon Treaty, he and his team have repeatedly brought Britain into disrepute with their ogvert womanising and drunken loutish behaviour, not to mention childish antics and posturings eg. dressing as chickens, being cautioned by police for demonstrations few noticed, driving around like excited schoolboys with war time scout cars on public highways etc. etc.
Let us also not forget Nigel Farage’s goffer and sewer rat Mark Croucher’s drubbing in the Courts when they tried to set me up for bankruptcy with a dishonest claim in the Courts which found against them and their subsequent failure to pay the £13,000+ they were shown to owe me by the Court and failure to honour British Justice and pay their dues!
Then of course we take note of the fact that to try to block the petition of over 2.1/4 Million signatures that obtained the debate in the House of Commons on Britain’s future relationship with the EU and the resultant Referendum Nigel Farage was shown in Court to have dishonestly colluded with John Ison to try to set Nikki Sinclaire, who founded and managed The Petition that brought about the Referendum, they failed in their criminal conspiracy and Nikki Sincliare was totally exhonourated of the dishonest claims made.
These people Donald Trump’s team have foolishly presented to him should have no role in diplomacy or British domestic politics they in no way represent the values that our ancestors willingly gave their lives to enshrine in British justice, tollerance or daily life – They are largely beneath contempt. At least Donald Trump obtained the public vote that swayed the Electoral College to elect him as POTUS Elect let us not add to his problems by linking him in any way with the likes of Farage and his mottley crew of nere do wells.
As an asside: Just what is the fascination with trophy wives from behind the Iron Curtain and the fascination with the brutish politics of Russia, its satelites and its President that seems to hold these men in thrall? Clearly some amongst them are clearly a security risk, as is the ready willingness of RT to propagandise their dissidence!
US presidential election: Forecast failure
09 November 2016
A surprise victory for Donald Trump triggered volatility on markets, but investors should recall the lessons of the Brexit vote.
The victory for Donald Trump in the US presidential election appeared highly improbable only a couple of weeks ago; but it was always expected to create uncertainty and short-term volatility in markets. An initial ‘risk-off’ reaction was the likely result; bigger questions, such as over trade relations and fiscal policy, will be answered at a much slower pace.
In the meantime, it is important that investors sit tight and remember that such short-term fluctuations are an inevitable feature of markets, and do not alter the fundamental need for individuals to save and invest for their future.
Undeniably, Trump represented the ‘change candidate’; but regardless of the result, it is important to remember that the economic powers of the president are limited. Once in power, most presidents tack towards the centre. The reality is that major changes to the US economy have not corresponded with political shifts and there is little historic evidence that the US economy performs better under any particular political hue. The relationship between growth and who sits in the Oval Office is tenuous at best.
After an initial shock, markets may reflect that the checks and balances of the US political system will somewhat limit the new president’s freedom of action. Those who fear Donald Trump’s anti-trade stance will doubtless be reassured that even a Republican-controlled Congress is unlikely to simply rubber-stamp any extreme protectionist policies, not least because the Republican Party has generally favoured free trade. Moreover, the uncertainty created by the result may stay the hand of the Federal Reserve in raising rates, which should boost equity markets; should the dollar lose value on a sustained basis, it would also act as a cushion. The 10-week wait until Inauguration Day provides a further chance for initial fears to subside.
Trump will inherit a growing US economy that has recovered well from the financial crisis and is fundamentally strong, with corporate earnings on an improving trajectory. This should continue to give support to long-term investors. Uncertainties lie ahead but markets have dealt with similar recent concerns and volatility, such as in the aftermath of the Brexit vote, and reached new highs. Indeed, given the similar shock with which the result was received, the UK’s Brexit vote could even provide something like a road map over the next few months.
The reality of a Trump administration will only be known in time, but the key principles of investing still hold true, whatever the election outcome. Individuals should continue to put in place long-term plans for their financial future and not be distracted by short-term events. Skilled investment managers are best-placed to make the decisions that can help protect investments against a range of risks – political or otherwise.
According to the Wall Street Journal: “Mr Obama walked his successor through the duties of running the country, and Mr Trump seemed surprised by the scope.”
Even Trump’s aides – who are supposed to be the experts here – were “unaware the entire presidential staff… had to be replaced”, it added.
After what must have been an epic facepalm, “Mr Obama realised the Republican needs more guidance. He plans to spend more time with his successor than presidents typically do”.
So what might that “guidance” be like? Here’s the first, imagined phone call between the two…
“Hello? Is it me you’re looking for?”(Photo: Getty)
“No. Look, anyway how are things going? I know we agreed you could have my number and call if you needed any guidance but it’s day one, Donald. Aren’t you busy settling into the Oval Office?”
If you didn’t have a fluffy bunny on your head the eagle wouldn’t peck it, Donald
“Not really, Barack. There’s a damn great eagle in here and I.T. haven’t given me a password to log on yet. Where are you anyway?”
“You would need slabs about 40ft high and 10inches thick, that would be planted 7ft in the ground. It’s uneconomic to move them thousands of miles. You’d have to make the slabs near the wall.”
“Sure, sure. We can do that. New jobs. The best jobs. Make America Great Again!”
“You don’t understand Donald. Concrete is made from aggregate you have to quarry. There aren’t enough quarries for that near the Mexican border. The nearest concrete facility is in fact Mexican.”
“Bummer.”
“And before you ask Donald, a fence has lots of the same problems”(Photo: Getty)
“And because a lot of the border is inaccessible desert and mountains you’d have to build some roads to get the work crews out there. And then dig 7ft into rock to put the slabs in, put some razor wire on the top, cameras, staffing. The total cost is projected to be $15bn.”
“We’re going to borrow lots of money though. Make America Indebted Again!”
“Donald, you can do that. You can borrow some money. And you’re going to have to spend quite a lot of it on concrete and on recruiting a LOT more border guards because those guys all get pensions, you know.”
“That’s right Donald, that’s what you said. You wanted to deport 11m people. More recently you said it’s 2m to 3m, so I’m not sure how many you want to deport now.”
“Uh. Some? Dunno.”(Photo: Getty)
“As many as we can, Barack. DRAIN THAT SWAMP. “
“OK Donald, 2m would mean 1,369 deportations a day, 365 days a year, throughout your term of office. That would need a lot of immigration officials, two jumbo jets a day, a suspension of the legal appeals process and removing the entire bottom tier of the US economy. No gardeners, no nannies, no garbagemen, no fruit pickers.”
“Well we can give those jobs to Americans!”
“Yes you can. But it would also mean fewer cars being bought, fewer goods and services, a lower tax take and probably a few more vigilante groups rounding immigrants up ‘to be helpful’, so probably some criminal justice costs too. Oh and all the decent baristas would be in Cuba.”
“Mine hurt every day for eight years, Donald. Mainly because I kept hitting the desk with it whenever some dumbass on Twitter said my birth certificate was a fake.”
“Please, someone make it better”(Photo: Pete Souza/The White House/eyevine)
“It’s a great idea! It’s one of mine! Everyone says it’s the best idea EVER. “
“That would start a global trade war with every nation raising or lowering tariffs in order to attract the best goods and services, with knock-on economic effects for the Earth’s 6bn inhabitants, diplomacy and global conflict, Donald.”
“Well, OK, OK, all right then how about this? I’m going to make it easier for people to access and pay for two- and four-year technical and vocational college courses so they can all get better jobs.”
“That’s a great idea Donald.”
“It is? You think so? WOW. I totally like thought Ivanka was stupid when she suggested it.”
“DON’T TOUCH THAT BUTTON DONALD. BAD. NO. NOT THE BUTTON.”
RUN AWAY(Photo: Pete Souza/The White House)
“You sure?”
“I’m sure. How about your tax cuts? How’s that going?”
“Oh I’m going to give a multi-billion dollar tax break to billionaires.”
“I’m sure that’s not what you promised Donald.”
“Oh yeah I said the middle classes but it’ll be billionaires too, so that’s cool. And corporations. And I’m going to close bits of the internet that ISIS uses. And scrap most of your dumb doctors and nurses thing. And, and, and I’m going to keep Guantanamo Bay open and send Hillary there.”
“Oh right. Hey Donald, guess what I just worked out?”
It all sounds LOVELY(Photo: Getty)
“What?”
“It sounds like America is going to have a big wall to keep people apart, no money, a thriving black market economy, mobsters, little contact with the outside world, perks only for those who can afford it, and internet censorship. There might even be some white supremacists in there. You know where else is just like that?”
“No, where?”
“Supermax jail, Donald. You’re putting America in jail.”
“No, I’m just going to put the webby guy in jail.”
“Is that because he hasn’t given you a password yet?”
“Whaddya mean I won’t be able to log on? How can I blow stuff up if I don’t log on?”(Photo: Getty)
“No the other guy. The guy in the webby stuff.”
“You’re going to have to help me out. Where did you see him?”
“He’s in the corridor. He runs after me all the time. He’s got webs all over his clothes. And there’s this guy with pointy ears on a mask, and some dude in blue pantyhose is drinking whisky in the kitchen.”
“That’s Spiderman, Batman and Superman, Donald. You can’t put them in jail. They’re the good guys. Well, Superman will be better in a bit.”
You got the wrong president, Spidey(Photo: Peter Souza/Twitter)
“Oh yeah? How about the French toast?”
“That’s French, Donald.”
“The cars?”
“Japanese.”
“Our iPhones!”
“Made in China.”
“DAMMIT, BARACK. This is so HARD.”
“I know, man. That’s partly why we have a year and a half of presidential hustings so we get the absolute best candidates who know their stuff. Something must’ve gone wrong this time.”
ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
I am NOT a WARMIST
I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
I do NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence
I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
Nigel Farage & His Sex Life are seemingly paid for by UKIP & The EFD, its sponsors & members and Tax Payers!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
so far I have refrained from providing the facts on this story on my blog as much of it has been put in the hands of journalists and I feel it would be exceeding poor manners to draw attention to the facts that they have been given, in an effort to clean up UKIP, and publish on my blog before they have had the opportunity to publish the stories.
However you will note almost all of the facts that are coming to light at the moment have been published on this blog in some detail over the years, and unlike others whop are openly being quoted no one can legitimately or plausibly believe I am some sort of embittered anti UKIP troll who had their ambitions thwarted as I have never been a member of UKIP nor any other political party and have repeatedly refused to stand for any political office over the years – frequently making the excuse that I wouldn’t want people to think I was that corrupt! ;-)I was never interested in a job employed by UKIP and clearly as I was not interested in a sexual relationship with Farage nor did I wish to join his claque clearly the chances of preferment in UKIP would have been loaded against me it seems!I did tweet some time ago:
The Nigel Farage story has moved on today, but is by no means abating. The media, however are moving away from the slightly risky territory of the UKIP leader paying a former mistress and onto the very much safer ground of him paying his wife, Kirsten, out of his secretarial allowance.
(G.L-W comment: The story which was posted on this blog years ago when Daniel Foggo broke the story in The Sunday Times.)This is where theFinancial Timesstands, while the loss-makingGuardianhas resuscitateda video clip, with Farage stating that an MEP could earn as much as a Goldman Sachs banker through claiming expenses and employing his wife.That was part of a longer documentary,Enemy Within, screened on BBC2 in 2000, at a time when there were only Michael Holmes, Jeffrey Titford and Nigel as MEPs. That was the time when the MEPs were pledging to put their surplus expenses into a fund to help people stricken by EU red tape, with a promise that wives and other relatives would not be taken on the payroll.
(G.L-W comment: Many will remember that Farage loudly proclaimed giving £11,000 to The Metric Martyrs however, as they are happy to confirm, never receioved ANY money from Farage, Titford or UKIP.
Farage & Titford were found guilty of fraudulent use of tax payers money and were ordered to repay £11,000 – that time!)After yesterday’s epic front page headline fromThe Sun, demanding, “Did UKIP with your aide Nige?”, on the back of a page 5 story, theDaily Mailrepeats the allegation today that Farage had an affair with Anabelle Fuller, who returned to Farage’s personal payroll last year.The paper thus asks, “Could Nigel Farage’s ‘weakness for women’ be his Achilles’ heel?”, declaring that: “Ukip leader’s love life may be his undoing at May’s Euro elections”.
However, a piece onHuffington Postrehearses yesterday’s story, but is notable for some of the comments which suggest that Farage’s private life is his own affair, and nobody else’s business. That is fair enough comment, or would have been until Farage decided to mix business with pleasure. Then it becomes a legitimate public issue.
(G.L-W. comment: It is far more the business of voters, tax payers and EUroSceptics more than any as he has clearly employed a number of his sexual partners on the payroll people whose talents are clearly other than as researchers, PR or politics in general which probably explains why UKIP is so lacking in competent research & gravitas. Particularly as the UKIP leadership mantra known well to many has always been ‘What happens in Brusells stays in Brusells’.)And Farage has most certainly been mixing business with pleasure. I recall once walking into Farage’s office in Strasbourg, only to find him in a passionate embrace with the latest intern, while Kirsten was actually in town, with his newly-born child.
(G.L-W. comment: How discreet of Richard when the fact is in the office Nigel Farage was caught in delicto flagrante with a French intern who it was common gossip he passed on to Paul Nuttall when he had ffinished with her and put her on the payroll – Her name is well known, however there is no value in naming her as she like annabelle Fuller are just using their notable assetts for financial gain it seems and are not alone in UKIP.They themselves are of little or no significance beyond the fact they are on the payroll for abilities other than political competence it seems.)Later, we – the staff – had the embarrassing experience of having a fiery Kirsten storming into the office to demand from us information on what was going on. But far from being repentant, Farage gave the intern a full-time post. It thus became evident that the way to success for an attractive female was via Farage’s bed.
Very much later, theDaily Mailtracked down this former employee, but she refused to spill the beans, then having her own career to think of as a full-time Brussels functionnaire. That left the paper without a libel-proof story, so the details were never released.
As for Annabelle Fuller, her relationship with Farage was an open secret. Such was their lack of caution that Farage had to be warned several times about making it too overt. He was, for instance, cautioned against taking her to Washington for a long weekend at the taxpayer’s expense. But he never denied to friends and colleagues the nature of the relationship.
(G.L-W. comment: Were Farage an honest man he could confirm I warned him of the danger and advided him not to take her as he would be setting himself up – he took my advice and at the last minute dropped her from the trip.)
Once the newspapers started to pick it up, though, both emphatically denied their tryst, making ample use of the services of no-win, no-fee legal services. More that a few journalists fell foul of the Farage sting, leaving a legacy of ill-will that could only bode ill.
The show-down with the long-suffering Kirsten, however, could not be put off forever. More than once, she had locked him out of the house when he had returned in the small hours from his drunken, womanising binges, and with one expensive divorce already costing him dear, he could not afford another.
The question thus remains as to whether Farage did a deal with public money. At the moment, no one is saying, but not a few in the party have been asking whether paying Kirsten her £30,000 salary was “hush money” for putting up with Annabelle. There had to be a reason for breaking all the promises ever made by UKIP about not hiring wives.
But now, even Mz Fuller is back on the payroll. I think we are also entitled to know if that is because she knows where too many bodies are buried. For whatever reason, a woman with an erratic background and little to commend her, is being paid a stellar £60,000 salary by Farage – plus additional fees to her PR business.
Thus, the UKIP leader is paying his women as good as £100,000 a year from taxpayers’ funds. And it is that, not his sexual peccadilloes, which is rightly in the public interest. We, likeThe Sun, are entitled to ask questions about these employments.
The point, of course, is that secretarial allowances are to enable MEPs to service their constituencies and perform effectively as elected representatives. For that, research is essential, an area in which UKIP generally – and Farage in particular – is dismally lacking.
As a former researcher for Farage’s one-time group in Brussels, the EDD, I know only too well how vital the research role is. After I left, the role was never properly serviced. Bloom even sought my services again, but I recall my response being: “not even if hell freezes over”. I now work as a researcher in a private capacity, for some decent men.
But I am very far from being the only competent researcher in the business. And for £100,000 a year, Farage could buy some serious capability. How much of the low-grade output coming out of UKIP is the result of his spending taxpayers’ money on keeping his women quiet?
If he had done as I had suggested, and taken a like amount from the expenses of each of the UKIP MEPs, with additional group funds we could have set up a world-class research unit in Brussels, relying on the overhead being paid for by the European Parliament. The aim was to rival the famous Conservative Research Department, the unit which kept Margaret Thatcher in power.
Despite all sorts of malicious rumours and ill-informed gossip, that was the real reason Farage and I fell out. I wanted the party to be research-led, pre-empting the FUD, keeping our MEPs and members properly informed and making a solid, unimpeachable case for leaving the EU. That’s why, in the first instance, Booker and I wroteThe Great Deception, a book Farage did his best to sabotage, seeking to prevent it being published.On the other hand, he was already frittering away money on fruitless enterprises, on hiring his women and on topping up his already generous pension from his office expenses. The courageous Spiked online, meanwhile, deletes my comments on its own sycophantic piece, even as the sky darkens with pigeons coming home to roost.With the likes ofSpikedand others giving him an easy ride, Farage has got away with it for so long that he believes he can walk on water. But now, a number of journalists – who have also had to put up with a number of more sinister threats than just libel suits – have found ways of showing that he is just another opportunist politician on the gravy train.
That, of course, leaves UKIP members out on a limb. Yet Farage, in his own defence,assertsthat his supporters “have had to develop thick skins and brave resilience when dealing with ‘smears'”. By this means, he dismisses the recent press as “part of a concerted campaign to undermine us which just makes us dig our heels in and wave off the Establishment”. But it won’t wash.
This is exactly what one might expect of Farage, but those who wish to dismiss current events as “smears” need to grow up. It is a miracle that their leader has got away with it for so long. He has held hostages to fortune for so many years that it was only a matter of time before he got his comeuppance. If hadn’t been this, it would have been something else.
Nor is this the end of it. There is much, much more in the pipeline. By the time the media has finished, the only thing left of Farage’s reputation will be smoking wreckage – however long it takes. His supporters have been backing the wrong man. They need to be thinking about how to rescue the party before it too crashes and burns.
To view Dr. Richard North’s original article CLICK HERE
May I remind readers that Nigel Farage personally gave an undertaking on Meridian TV prior to being elected an MEP that UKIP MEPs if elected would under no circumstances employ wives or family members, having no doubt obtained many votes on the strength of this undertaking it clearly wasn’t long before Farage employed his wife and hi mistresses and other sexual partners.This fact did not come to light until we published the facts which were taken up by the media just as is occurring at the moment as they scour this blog and that of Junius for more reliable facts.
The theft of an MP’s House of Commons Pass, his telephone and correspondence by Annabelle Fuller, whilst enjoying employment courtesy of Nigel Farage, is also proving of interest to the media!If you want more details on these iniquitous abuses of public money I suggest you keep a close eye on the British media, who are giving them the attention they deserves, despite the other important stories in the news at the moment be that Oscar Pistorius Trial, Malayan Airways Missing Plane, Tony Benn’s Death, Russia on the verge of War with Ukraine as it seizes Crimea – yet still you will see the Farage Party featured!We can expect UKIP to make every effort to spin this story be that with Annabelle Fuller trying to draw the fire for her ex lover by bleating about being picked on – No one is interested in her it is her behaviour and that of Farage which is the matter of concern it is Farage who has been all too enthusiastic in lambasting the EU for wasting money and wrong doing.
I note Farage in staggering hypocrisy has been accusing Nikki Sinclaire of being a bitter thwarted ex member of UKIP with a vendetta which is clearly a fantasy face saving effort by Farage.
Farage also claims she acted and named him and his unethical behaviour and abuse of tax payers’ money as an act of cowardice, by acting under Parliamentary Privilege, which is a bit rich when you consider the use of Parliamentary Privilege particularly when he exposed Barrott’s offences.
For the moment I will leave readers to follow up on the facts in the media, including the dishonest denials and lies of Farage!
Phone-hacker Glenn Mulcaire blagged Nigel Farage’s phone details in a bid to stand up whether he was having an affair, a court heard.
Mulcaire, the Old Bailey heard, requested a pin reset from Farage’s mobile provider so he could listen into the politician’s messages.
The News of the World thought the UK Independence Party leader was having an affair in Brussels with Liga Howells.
Voicemails belonging to both Farage and Howells were intercepted in 2006, while a story about their alleged affair appeared in the News of the World in April 2006.
Mulcaire has already admitted phone-hacking.
Both Farage and Howells had voicemails intercepted in 2006, with a story appearing in the NotW about their alleged affair in April 2006.
For details on the News of the World article CLICK HERE
Presumably IF any compensation will be paid; from both the phone network suppliers, who gave away security codes to a blagger, and from Glenn Mulclaire, or his employers (if he was in the employ of anyone rather than a freelancer); any such compensation would of course be morally due to UKIP, because had Farage been anyone other than a leader of UKIP, his sex life would have been a matter of indifference to the media.
David Bannerman Left-Out in The Cold with no job! He could almost have counted on being re-elected as a UKIP MEP but is clearly reveiled by Tory voters despite his promises to deliver the dirt on UKIP and desperately trying to ingratiate himself with Tory Branch Chairmen!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Hi,
you may have noted that we covered this item as a TWEET a couple of days ago:
I note David Bannerman is out in the cold! Vikki Ford & Van Orden are the Tories expected to be returned as MEPs – 2014 in EU Eastern Region
but as I have a moment I have tracked down further details for you:
Tories ‘stick the knife into’ UKIP defector David Campbell Bannerman
Written by: CHRIS HAVERGAL
David Campbell Bannerman, Conservative MEP for the Eastern region
One of the region’s MEPs faces an uncertain future after failing to win the backing of party bosses.
David Campbell Bannerman, who defected to the Conservatives from UKIP in 2011, must go through a ballot of all Tory members if he is to be selected as a candidate for next year’s European elections because he did not win the support of 60 per cent of constituency chairmen.
Richard Howitt, a Labour MEP for the Eastern region, claimed the Conservatives were “tearing each other apart”.
He said: “This shows the Tories at war with UKIP in the East of England, sticking the knife in to someone they’d so recently welcomed with open arms, despite the fact most of them agree with every word he says.
“Mr Campbell Bannerman appears to be the carpet-bagger who has had the rug pulled from underneath him.”
Mr Campbell Bannerman, a Cambridge resident who is a former deputy leader of UKIP, said he was confident he would get back on the ballot paper.
He said: “It’s not about sticking knives in, it’s about democracy and I welcome the choice of the membership.
“I came to the party from UKIP and I think there is a feeling I should go to the full membership.”
The other two Conservative MEPs seeking re-election next year, Vicky Ford and Geoffrey Van Orden, both won the backing of party bosses – although Mr Howitt claimed Mr Van Orden had scraped through by a single vote.
The fourth Conservative MEP, Robert Sturdy, is retiring.
The better informed readers will remember that when David Bannerman first set out to reinvent himself as a member of UKIP, having failed ever to get elected within the Tory Party, I not only cautioned against accepting his duplicity as a turncoat but also exposed the fact that both his CV and even his claims relative to ancestry were a pack of lies.
However the inept and unprofessional leadership of UKIP with no meaningful ability to vet candidates were impressed by the fraudulent credentials he put forward!
I well remember his parents relief though at that stage hope, that David might get himself a proper job after years of drifting around the periphery of the Tory Party.
In real terms not only was David Bannerman a fraud it transpired that he was also embroilled in fraudulent abuse of the public purse and is still under investigation by OLAF as a result of Daniel Foggo’s exposure of misuse of public funds, in The Sunday Times as explained on camera by Stuart Agnew who is also still under investigation for abuse of the public purse and for his part in electoral fraud and money laundering in cahoots with UKIP’s dodgey Peer Malcolm Pearson and his private company which he uses for money laundering to cheat the system! As admitted to on camera and published in the same article!
You may also be interested to note the other Tory turncoat the odious and untrustworthy Niel Hamilton who brought shame on British House of Commons with his sleaze and cash for questions, which in part brought down the Major Government and gave rise to the 13 unlucky years of economic illiteracy of Labour’s dishonest and profligate incompetence! Hamilton featured on Panorama at the time and again in the last week in the hour long documentary by Daniel Foggo which exposed Patrick Mercer MP’s willingness to accept bribes in the form of cash for questions – another very competent exposure by Daniel Foggo, which can be seen on iPod CLICK HERE.
UKIP Treachery, Trash & Unprofessional In Fighting …!
Examples provided generously by public postings on the internet, supplied to me by disgusted supporters and members of UKIP who wish to see the party made fit for purpose!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
SORRY about the delay!
We’ll try for the screen captures & copies next – they seem to be causing conflict in loading!
There was considerable cross referencing to do AGAIN and also redacting to ensure the security of my sources, and the checkable veracity of the posts.
I appologise for the delay but having done the work last night Firefox crashed thus I have redone the work when it was convenient!
Here are the facts and the examples promised:
.
Hi,
You may find the sordid style of the odious squabbling and jockeying for position and popularity of these insecure and self serving people gives an insight into just how odious is UKIP’s leadership team and the claque who wriggle, squabble and back stab, when not fauning and grovelling or in the beds of others to gain status really are!
Let us go back in time a little with a YouTube entry from the amoral and foul mouthed Annabelle Fuller:
Interesting when you consider this foolish woman’s track record of corruption and dishonesty!
Behaviour which forced her to run away from UKIP due to her unprofessional abuse of data protection – abuse which cost UKIP one of its better donors and chairmen John Whittaker who quit as he was no longer willing to befoul his personal reputation covering for Nigel Farage’s doxy’s dishonesty and incompetence.
We understand it was the track record of foul language and unprofessionalism that cost Fuller her next job withThe British legion and then with Army Pensions, despite her father’s influence.
However she is back again with Farage and on a salary of around £50K as I recall, not to mention drawing two incomes from the public purse by being paid for other and more personal services via her claims of having PR experience of value, rather than just pestering journos with strange tweets and personal calls, as they have told me! Billed presumably through Athena PR!
Or for that matter telling lies about people and promoting her personal style whilst drunk to the extent of not just false witness and dishonesty but also stealing from the unsuspecting marque as with the Blackberry, The House of Commons pass and private correspondence when trusted to enter an MP’s flat!
I presume there is some devious means of paying to avoid the EU rule of being doubly employed from their funds! Another UKIP financial scam organised by their tame accountant to keep Farage’s fingerprints off of the paper work!
Review her comments on YouTube above and assess for yourself just howmuch of a liability she is for UKIP and then read on – you may also consider it is a blind eye to her services that explains why Farage’s wife is paid £30K for her inactivity as a UKIP staffer – unknown in terms of any work done by Farage’s own constituency office and her employment was unknown until research turned up the facts which Daniel Foggo subsequently published in The Sunday Times.
Let us move on:
Here is a posting from 10-Feb-2013 – yet again from Annabelle Fuller regarding Diane James, and involving Sean Howlett, Steven Wolfe, David Coburn and Mick McGough
The conversation moved on involving discussion of the same individuals and minded of the disproportionate income relative to competence and ability it is clear the money isn’t even for professionalism, integrity, ethics or discression!” Loyalty to the party is clearly a ‘No No’ from this specimen!
Clearly Nigel Farage’s own PA is clearly out of her depth and batting in her own self interest all too willing to drag Farage and UKIP into the gutter of her life!
These duplicitous individuals are all over Diane James like a cheap suit to her face but clearly happy to do all they can to unseat her behind her back regardless of her doing well for UKIP at Eastleigh – it seems they are working to protect their jobs by ensuring their puppet master faces no challengers – so very typical of the divisive and unprofessional behaviour in Farage’s Party!
Again the conversation moves on and we see UKIP Yoooff who themselves consider Diane James ‘An Utter Bitch‘ someone who their contempt for is manifest, with comments like ‘who has never represented the party‘
UKIP who endlessly proclaim they are ethical and represent true British values are clearly rotten to the core.
It is that they endlessly protest they are not like the other parties that makes this more shocking as they are clearly riddled with hatred, self interest, greed and rivalry on a scale that surpasses even the worst in other parties.
Then on a different theme we see the infighting in UKIP Yoooff from the correspondence with his apparent mentor Steven Woolfe:
And toadying to, of all people, Neil Hamilton, the corrupt and discreditted ex Tory, dumped in a miasma of sleaze that has now engulfed UKIP:
You will of course be able to find further examples of stupidity, self serving, unprofessionalism, nepotism, cronyism, back stabbing, disloyalty and downright vituperative trash with just a few minutes search on the internet this little party displays all the reasons that so few honourable and decent folk of any consequence back them in domestic elections.
Although UKIP’s numbers are small; relative to the main parties they sure make up for it with their vile behaviour which can be found with a moments search!
Just look at CLICK HERE where much of this material can be found to have been posted!
Regards,
Greg_L-W. . PS ADDED 22-Sep-2013
This eMail correspondence that follows is an extract from the full eMail which I received on this issue:
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:27:01 +0000
Subject: Sean / Annabelle emails
YI: Change You Cant Believe In
KT got some threats after he posted this post earlier, as readers know KT is nice and fair, yeah KT pokes fun at politicians (if you cant laugh at them then you only cry) but its always done in the right way, anyway KT is going off piste a bit, lets rewind a bit, lets go back to say …. February 10th , that cool? its an email exchange between UKIP members before the polls closed for Eastliegh, in fact a few weeks before the polls closed , these email involve Ms Fuller (Nigel Farage`s PA) , Sean Howlett and David Corburn :
They are discussing the then UKIP candidate for Eastlaigh Diane James, but then it moves on
As you can see Nigel Farage`s PA and others were bad mouthing Diane James behind her back and then being all nice to her face, even tho Diane came second in Eastleigh people close to Nigel Farage were slagging Diane James of, even after these e-mails YI (Young independence) requested that people vote for Diane James:
UKIP claim they are different than all the others, the truth is that they are as two faced as all the others, they asked voters to vote for someone they described as a “utter bitch” and someone *who has never represented the party* , different from the others? no chance!
Update : While KT was checking this piece out he came across Ms Fullers You Tube page
KT may be mistaken but UKIP are not keen on Poles……
I believe now that this post has the various screen shots we can reasonably expect utterly implausible claims that their Blogs have been hacked – surprising that they have failed to claim this previously even though they knew the material had been screen captured and circulated!
Claims of being hacked are quite fashionable at the moment – such claims are so much more plausible if they are reported when they happen rather than when when their postings are highlighted!
Mark D’Arcy in The Telegraph Shows The Utter Irrelevance of The Farage Party!Clearly results prove the point!!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,I note that Mark D’Arcy, The Telegraph political correspondent, in his predictions for the year ahead makes no mention of any relevance of UKIP but does allude in some detail to the debate obtained in The House of Commons by Nikki Sinclaire!The implication seems to be that Sinclaire has more relevance than all of UKIP, though I do feel that is something of an exageration, though based on actual achievement it does have some credibility as UKIP’s only publicity seems to be the antics of Nigel Farage, which does little but damage in terms of gravitas and his deeply destructive association with xenophobes, racists, anti Jewish, anti homosexual advocates of political violence in his pro EU membership EFD Group does the grass roots members no good!
Little wonder he cares not a jot about the many lost Court cases, the divisve behaviour of his claque and the obvious low rent irrelevance of his NEC whom he ignores as shown by the idiocy of Duffy, McGough and the other nebishes of no consequence.
To quote Mark D’Arcy for January & February:
Meanwhile, in the Commons, the whips will be endeavouring to ensure that the devil does not find work for MPs’ idle hands.
There’s some suggestion of a crunch euro-vote in the Commons at some point in February on moves to increase the UK’s subscription to the IMF – the international emergency finance facility which bails out countries in financial trouble. European test I’m not clear this will actually happen – but if it does, it could provide a difficult test for the government with Labour opposing any extra contribution that could then be used to bail out eurozone economies.
Were Labour and most of the 81 Conservative euro-rebels to join forces, the government would lose.
I’ve been pointing out for a while that the government can’t rely on its majority on issues like this, so the smart thing to do would be not to have the fight, if at all possible.
But secondly, it is a mistake to think of the 81 – the MPs who rebelled in the backbench debate calling for a referendum earlier this year – as a cohesive group, or a party within a party.
In Euroscepticism there are many mansions, and some of the 81 would be very reluctant to cast a vote that might bring down the coalition government or otherwise cause chaos.
Others wouldn’t blink before doing so. What I don’t doubt is that the core sceptic (and I really must find a better word) strategists will want to keep up pressure on ministers they continue to regard as a bit suspect on the European Union.
However what Mark D’Arcy fails to point out is that MPs NEVER vote honestly if it means they might lose their job – Just look at how corrupt was the final Maastricht vote where all those smug and voluble EUroSceptics who to this day claim they voted AGAINST Maastricht voted the bill through to save their own jobs!
I note UKIP is still talking of a surge in the Poles – The only surge in the Poles UKIP has EVER experienced was as a result of Roger Knapman’s family’s people traffiking business which clearly led to a surge in the number of Poles in his attic at the expense of British skilled artisans and labourers!
Here are UKIP’s results in a few recent actual poles (as opposed to theoretical results!):
Westbourne, Brighton and Hove
Conservative
1,027
Labour
826
Green
645
Lib Dem
45
UKIP
36
Trade Unionists &
Socialists Against Cuts
20
European Citizens Party
13
Worlingham, Suffolk
Con
706
Lab586Green137UKIP64LD46
Feltham & Heston (Parliamentary by-election)
Seema Malhotra, Labour – 12,639
Mark Bowen, Conservative – 6,436
Roger Crouch, Liberal Democrats – 1,364
Andrew Charalambous, UKIP – 1,276
David Furness, BNP – 540
Daniel Goldsmith, Green – 426
Roger Cooper, English Democrats – 322
George Hallam, London People Before Profit – 128
David Bishop, Bus-Pass Elvis Party – 93
It is near impossible to describe these results with any honesty or integrity as anything other than catastrophic and consider the fact that to get a mere 10% of the vote needed to win and considerably less % of the overall vote in Feltham UKIP prostituted almost all its policies, slinging them out of the window without a moment of democratic credibility to attract a wealthy clown as candidate!
You will note they have made a similar spectacle of themselves in Wales CLICK HERE is it any wonder they consistently bomb in the reality stakes whatever the surge in the Polls as they may dishonestly claim to be reality!
Or as Roger Knapmann showed, in Daniel Foggo’s well researched report in The Sunday Times, amongst his Poles there was also a surge made by far worse in publicity terms by the crass dishonesty and defamatory statements of the odious and corrupt Mark Croucher!
. .
Some Background On Ekaterina Paderina & Arron Banks The Tory Backer who switched to supporting Nigel Farage’s Ukip!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
‘Spy MP’ helped Russian woman in mafia inquiry
Documents show that Mike Hancock involved himself so closely in the case of the second woman that he hand-delivered a letter to her
Daniel Foggo Published: 12 December 2010
Hancock’s parliamentary assistant Katia Zatuliveter is in detention awaiting deportation (Chris Ison)
A Liberal Democrat MP whose parliamentary assistant has been accused by MI5 of being a spy intervened to stop another young Russian woman being deported. She was being investigated by Special Branch detectives over possible links to the Russian mafia.
Documents seen by The Sunday Times show that Mike Hancock involved himself so closely in the case of the second woman that he hand-delivered a letter to her, confirming her permission to remain in Britain. Her husband at the time, whom she had married to stay in the country, has accused Hancock of having designs on his wife.
Hancock’s parliamentary assistant, Katia Zatuliveter, 25, is in detention awaiting deportation. MI5 believes she is an agent of the SVR, the Russian intelligence service.
The scandal has threatened to escalate into a full-blown diplomatic incident, with the Russian embassy insisting she is not an agent, and has raised questions over whether Hancock was compromising himself by becoming overly involved with young, attractive Russian women. Ekaterina Paderina, then aged 25, married Eric Butler, then 54, in 1998 within months of meeting him in Portsmouth, where Hancock is an MP. Butler said he was questioned by Special Branch in 1999.
“There were concerns about whether Ekaterina was in the country for legitimate reasons,” said Butler, now 66 and a retired ship steward.
Another source, who knew Butler and his wife, said he was also questioned by a Special Branch officer about Paderina.
“It wasn’t her specifically that Special Branch were interested in; she was merely a cog in what they were looking at,” said the source. “To put it very bluntly, they were looking at a Russian mafia connection to Portsmouth.”
Butler said he realised shortly after his wedding that Ekaterina had married him only so as to remain in Britain. Despite the marriage, the authorities made attempts to return her to Russia, and the couple approached Hancock for help. Butler said he quickly developed reservations over involving Hancock.
“I could see him looking at her in his office in a certain way,” he said. “One day I came home and found them both in the conservatory, and Ekaterina had her legs positioned in a way which was very provocative and Hancock was leaning forward in his chair. I got angry and told him I would thump him if he didn’t get out.”
Hancock wrote letters on Paderina’s behalf to Barbara Roche, the immigration minister at the time, supporting her application to stay in Britain.
An entry in Paderina’s diary in September 1999, seen by The Sunday Times, stated: “Mike Hancock arrived, we had a chat, he gave me a letter which said that I have been granted another visa for a year. Immediately it was like having a huge weight taken off my shoulders.”
After being divorced by Butler in 2001, Paderina quickly remarried another British man. Paderina, now 37 and with the married name Banks, said she had no knowledge of Special Branch’s interest in her. She denied ever having had an inappropriate relationship with Hancock and said she could not remember a confrontation between Butler and the MP in their house.
Of her relationship with Butler, she insisted their marriage had been “valid” but added: “I didn’t marry Eric Butler for love.”
Asked if her motive in marrying him was to stay in Britain, she said yes.
Hancock denied having behaved improperly with Paderina. He admitted writing letters on her behalf but denied any knowledge of police involvement.
When told of Paderina’s diary entry, he said: “I might have dropped off a letter at their house but I was certainly never in their house. I’m not that stupid.”
It is interesting to note that Ekaterina Paderina’s new married name is Banks and it would seem her husband Aaron Banks became the principle backer of Ukip with an income and resources that seem far from transparent6!
This correspondence between Ukip’s Press Office, the Farage gofer Gawain Towler and Gerard Batten thus becomes even more interesting:
From: Gawain Towler <gawain@gmail.com>
To: Gerard Batten <gerard.batten@btinternet.com>
Subject: Fwd: Evening Standard Letters – Katia Zatuliveter
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:27
Gerard,
Can you help here?
G
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: <joshua.neicho@standard.co.uk>
Date: 6 December 2010 14:22
Subject: Evening Standard Letters – Katia Zatuliveter
ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
I am NOT a WARMIST
I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
I do NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence
I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
Liga HOWELLS, a whore who sold her body & reputation in a classic (if implausible) ‘kiss & tell story’ with claims of oral sex using ICE & practices of DISCIPLINE & HUMILIATION with Nigel Farage of UKIP featured in The NotW!!
Liga HOWELLS, ICE, HUMILIATION, FARAGE & The NotW
‘MARRIED MEP Nigel Farage formed a European union with a half-German, half-Swedish blonde and begged her—yes, it was a WOMAN—to get MaaSTRICHT with him during sex’.
‘UK Independence Party MEP Farage is a fierce Eurosceptic. But he proved he can embrace Europeans if he wants to when he bedded Liga Howells—who was born in Latvia and speaks seven languages—hours after meeting her in a pub’.
subsequently removed, when Robert Maxwell closed The News of The World as planned, but sheltering behind the non story of telephone hacking!
So here is the text of the article on 29-Jan-2006:
MARRIED MEP Nigel Farage formed a European union with a half-German, half-Swedish blonde and begged her—yes, it was a WOMAN—to get MaaSTRICHT with him during sex.
UK Independence Party MEP Farage is a fierce Eurosceptic. But he proved he can embrace Europeans if he wants to when he bedded Liga Howells—who was born in Latvia and speaks seven languages—hours after meeting her in a pub.
The public school-educated toff stunned Liga with his kinky demands.
“I was quite shocked when he asked me to smack him during love-making,” revealed 25-year-old Liga. “He asked me if I would put him over my knee, but I refused, although I did give in and give him a few gentle taps while we were having sex.
“He also liked to call me Miss. It was ‘Yes Miss’ or ‘No Miss’ when we were in bed. I found this very odd.
“It was like he needed for me to dominate him, he enjoyed being controlled. I found it all a bit weird.”
Former Latvian TV news channel reporter Liga told how the UKIP Euro leader made sure she got NO KIP making love at least SEVEN times during their night of passion.
Farage only informed her he had a wife as they lay exhausted on her bed.
“It wasn’t after the first time we had sex that he told me, it was after quite a few times,” Liga said: “Afterwards he fell asleep and kept me awake because he was snoring like a horse.”
Ex-commodity broker Farage, 41, has joined the growing list of politicians exposed in sex scandals. The News of the World revealed how Lib Dem leadership hopeful Mark Oaten had an affair with a rent boy. Then his fellow candidate Simon Hughes admitted he was gay after TWICE denying it.
Liga, who is separated from her Brit husband, met Farage in the Black Horse pub near her home in Biggin Hill, Kent, on January 6.
Farage shares a house with wife Kirsten less than three miles from the pub. But Liga said the £59,000-a-year politician moved fast to get her INTO phpbb_bed.
She said: “We got quite close in the pub and we began kissing while we were in there. We agreed it would be ‘one night, and one night only’ between us.”
Liga and Farage, who helped found UKIP in 1993, then went back to her house.
They sat drinking wine and chatting until the early hours, when they went upstairs and stripped off to get in the bath together.
“We didn’t have sex in the bath but it was quite nice. He has a very good body for a man his age. He was quite well endowed too.”
After 20 minutes they dried off and headed for the bedroom, where Liga performed a sex act using ice cubes.
She said: “I put the ice cubes in my mouth. He really enjoyed what I was doing and was very noisy in letting me know.”
But Liga said she was left speechless when father-of-four Farage, revealed his kinky fantasy. “It was so weird,” she explained. “He asked me to smack him. He went, ‘Smack me, Miss’. I have never, ever heard anything like this in my whole life.
“He did ask me to humiliate him. It is beyond belief some of the things he asked me to do. And I wasn’t prepared to do what he asked me.
“We must have had sex about seven times. He had very good stamina.”
The pair exchanged numbers —but Farage’s wife found Liga’s on his mobile and called.
Liga said: “She was completely quiet on the other end. It freaked me out.”
In December Farage hit the headlines when he taunted Tony Blair as he made his final speech as EU President in Brussels.
And in 2004 Farage was exposed for quaffing £100 bottles of bubbly in seedy lap-dancing clubs in London and Strasbourg.
Last night he admitted he was in the ‘dog house’ with his wife for staying out all night at Liga’s.
He said: “I made a huge error of judgment going back with her.”
But he claimed: “I didn’t have a sexual relationship with her.
“That’s her fantasy.”.
I was surprised at the time that when it came to the crunch it was clear that Farage, for all his puff & bon homie, seemed not to have a friend or loyal supporter in the world, as absolutely no one neither colleagues nor staff, stepped forward to help him in his hour of need only Daniel Foggo and myself – as Daniel had tipped me off that Nigel was totally drunk in a pub, on the Friday afternoon, and likely to make a fool of himself and the party if he didn’t switch his mobile off!
I phoned Nigel and convinced him to turn his phone off to avoid the risk of demeaning the party by answering to someone who would make much of his drunken state so early on a working day – A style of behaviour not uncommon to him. You will remember that as long ago as when he was working for The French Bank he had been fired for his drunken excesses during working hours!
I was tipped off that there would be a story in The News of The World during Saturday and immediately set about damage limitation.
When the story broke I read it just after midnight but waited to see if it was in the paper version or just on the NotW web site and then phoned speaking with both Nigel, who was hugely hung over if not still drunk, and his wife Kirsten – they authorised me to publish the facts as I felt best but I did in fact write the article with the factual details that refuted the ‘story’ Liga Howells had concocted and sold to the media!
Clearly she had absolutely no evidence nor proof of the details she had concocted, but then again Farage had no way to prove his innocence!
Clearly Farage had no proven excuse however one need only consider the facts to realise the improbability of the story!
Obviously Farage’s insecurity and utterly irresponsible behaviour in consorting with prostitutes – be that in a bar or elsewhere, showed just how unsuited to leadership he was and just what a liability he was to any party of consequence!
On the plus side it was clear from my conversations on the Friday that the silly man was far too drunk to have made any intelligent choices and by the evening he was far too drunk to have performed in any manner as claimed by Liga Howells!
Kirsten did confirm that he had phoned her to come and collect him from the pub but she refused – partly in annoyance but far more consequentially as she could not leave the babies at home in bed and swan off to act as taxi to a drunk some distance from home!
The state in which Farage was on the Sunday confirmed that he would have been completely incapable sexually the night before and gave the lie to the whole story that Liga had concocted to sell!
A tip off and a little digging later indicated this was a part of the MO of this particular prostitute and that it was claimed she had sold just such a story on a prior occasion!
This in no way exonerates nor does it imply my respect for the protagonists – It is unarguable that Nigel Farage is a drunk who is not trustworthy, and thus completely unable to make intelligent decisions either as a parent or a politician, a husband or a party leader!
There is nothing macho or clever in holding forth in bars or bordellos and his childish behaviour in holding interviews with journalists in public houses has served UKIP catastrophically over the years – as he is so gullible that he is frequently strung along in a manner that totally undermines any concept of gravitas, professionalism or reliability UKIP may have ever aspired to!
Too often we see photographs of Farage quite clearly Brahms & List in public – the man may well be, to many, a likeable rogue but the downside is that in reality he is an insecure, immature fool the party clown perhaps even the performing monkey but it is clear he is not, nor will he ever be, a competent and trustworthy leader as he lacks the competence on all counts!
Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
As you can see Nigel Farage`s PA and others were bad mouthing Diane James behind her back and then being all nice to her face, even tho Diane came second in Eastleigh people close to Nigel Farage were slagging Diane James of, even after these e-mails YI (Young independence) requested that people vote for Diane James:
Ukip-vs-EUkip 