Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

“Farage’s politics lack credibility”

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/02/2013

“Farage’s politics lack credibility”
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

“Farage’s politics lack credibility”!

A comment made in The Herald in Scotland & based on facts & track record how right they are!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
clearly having consistently failed in domestic politics in these United Kingdoms for some 20 years, with less than 30 people elected to any office of consequence in British politics, where some 19,500 seats are available by election – it ill becomes Nigel Farage to posture and preen in Scotland where during those 20 years UKIP have made virtually no progress:

Interview: meet Nigel Farage

 
Thursday 21 February 2013

UK Political Editor MICHAEL SETTLE meets the UKIP leader who’s never short of an opinion or two for an in-depth interview on Europe, immigration, and the independence referendum

 

It is an irony piled on top of another irony that Nigel Farage’s London office sits uncomfortably in Europe House, the headquarters of the European Commission which, in a previous guise, was the home to Conservative Central Office.

When I mention this, the UKIP leader points out that the Commission’s London postcode even has the letters EU in it. “I’m not kidding,” declares Mr Farage, his eyes rolling in disbelief.

Yet while he might be a political cuckoo in the EU nest, the ebullient politician appears to be sitting pretty.

Never in such media demand, UKIP’s fortunes – in England, at least – are on the rise. Opinion polls have put the anti-EU party as high as 16%, while in a raft of by-elections last year it came second or third, replacing the Liberal Democrats as many voters’ party of protest.

“Yeah, to have grown over the last couple of years in the opinion polls the way we have has been very gratifying but we have to prove that that’s material and not theoretic. That’s why the county elections (this year in England) are very important and the euro elections (next year across the UK) are crucial to the whole momentum thing.”

Yet while momentum has been building south of the border, UKIP has barely caused a ripple in the Scottish political pool.

At the last euro election in 2009, it came sixth behind the Greens and polled under 5% and in the 2011 Holyrood elections, when UKIP proposed scrapping MSPs and replacing them at Holyrood with Westminster MPs, it did even worse and got less than 1%.

“Yeah, I have said Scotland has been a graveyard for us and that’s because the entire national debate in Scotland has been a different debate and the word ‘independence’ has meant something entirely false and that’s why I’m so pleased it’s been exposed and we can now have a proper debate in Scotland about far bigger constitutional issues than the relationship between Holyrood and Westminster; far bigger than that is the relationship of both those institutions with Brussels and that’s all changed.

“What’s been very interesting over the last few months is that as UKIP has grown in the polls we’ve grown in Scotland too.”

Like many others perhaps, I missed this development and ask what evidence Mr Farage has for this.

“Look at the regional breakdowns; look at YouGov, Comres, Survation, look at all of them. They vary and they fluctuate but we’ve been as high as 9% of the vote in Scotland. Given where we came from two years ago, it’s a significant shift, a potential shift in support for UKIP in Scotland.

“I’m not pretending it’s easy. We’ve managed in Wales, we got 15% in Wales, very credible, almost in line with our national percentage. We’ve had some little bits of electoral success in Northern Ireland. Clearly, the north of England has developed into almost as much as a powerhouse than the south of England for UKIP.

“The idea that perhaps people might have had 10 years ago that this is a sort of home-counties-retired half-colonels-who-were-jolly-angry (party), clearly that’s changed already.

“The missing part of the jigsaw within the UK has been Scotland and that’s because the debate hasn’t allowed us in; there’s been a different conversation going on.”

He goes on: “I never, ever make rash or stupid predictions, I just don’t – maybe comment and statements – and we are going to do everything we can in 2014 in the European elections in Scotland to get a breakthrough and to get elected representation in Scottish politics.

“We have proved in England that even with a small bridgehead, if your position is a good intellectual position, that is clearly arguable and events prove you right, you can build from a small bridge head into something that is quite significant in politics. I would say for UKIP in Scotland the 2014 European elections are the absolutely key.”

The UKIP leader makes clear that if the party is to become any sort of political force in Scotland, then it has to succeed in the 2014 euro elections.

“So I’m putting it on the line. For UKIP Scotland, who have been a relatively small organisation and who have valiantly battled on, who in the last year and a bit have suddenly started to grow and attract some fresh talent, our campaign on wind farms and various things is suddenly bringing in new and different type people.

“But there has to be some realisable gain to keep any sense of momentum and any positivity within the party going forward; 2014 is the watershed for UKIP Scotland.”

Unlike most politicians, who pause and nuance their remarks, trying to avoid controversy at any price, Mr Farage shoots from the hip and seems to revel in his forthrightness, laughing his tobacco-flavoured croaky laugh many times throughout the interview.

Yet the only time he hesitates and goes quiet is when I ask if 2014 – when pundits believe UKIP will attract the largest number of votes – could be a moment when British politics is realigned.

“I’ve wondered and thought about this for years…It’s such a tough question to answer but I would just say this – some of the top line issues that are most closely and clearly associated with UKIP are of such enormous power as political issues across the political spectrum; the Thatcherite right will agree with them but very big sections of patriotic Old Labour feel the same on these questions too, that there is the possibility that we could do what the Reform Party of Canada did and do something dramatic and remarkable.”

So it could be a mould-breaking SDP moment?

“Oh no, they got Blair. Blair was the first SDP Prime Minister. In fact, they’re all bloody SDP. Cameron’s SDP. The SDP achieved a total victory without actually winning themselves. This can manifest itself in lots of ways. In the case of the Reform party in Canada, they became the biggest party in the Canadian Parliament. So this can manifest itself in all sorts of different ways.”

So is it possible UKIP could realign British politics?

“Again, as I said earlier, I don’t make wild and silly predictions but I do think there is something very powerful in our headline issues.”

One of which is immigration. The latest controversy that has flared up is about what might or might not happen from January 2014 – just four months before those euro elections – when the work restrictions on Bulgaria and Romania will be lifted.

The UK Government, having admitted to having its own estimate about a possible influx of migrants, then said it did not have one; the estimate in 2004 when Poland and other eastern European countries joined the EU turned out to be wildly inaccurate.

“They’re in a mess,” declares Mr Farage. “They’re really scared because for years it was easy: Europe was over there, that was for intellectuals like Bill Cash and the Oxford Union; and immigration was over there and an entirely separate issue. Now in the minds of the public, they’re coming together as one and the same and they’re absolutely terrified of it.

“Every estimate that has been put out over the last 10 years on this, be it by the British Government, be it by the Romanian embassy, be it by whoever you like, has always been wrong by a factor of five or by a factor of 10 or whatever it may be. They’re half hoping it will go away.”

The UKIP leader produces a piece of paper and insists the declaration at the weekend by Coalition ministers that they can get tough with EU migrants wishing to take advantage of Britain’s benefits system is pie in the sky.

“Cameron says any Romanian who comes and has appendicitis will die on the street and we’ll all stand around and laugh. Within five hours of him saying it, Viviane Reding, the relevant European Commissioner, comes back and says sorry these are treaty commitments and she’s right.”

He refers to the habitual residency test where a migrant has to prove he or she is a job seeker, a worker, a student, a self-employed person or a self-sufficient person to qualify for welfare.

“Apart from pensioners, no one is excluded. What will not happen is Romanian pensioners will not be able to come and get old age pensions, that’s clear. That’s the one group of Romanians who will find access to direct benefit more difficult but absolutely everbody else that I can see can pass habitual residence. It’s possible that they could under the law be made to wait three months. I completely concede it’s possible.

“But if you come in and say I’m self-employed and I’m going to go and apply to be a Big Issue seller, you are by definition a self-employed person seeking work and you qualify on day one and not just for unemployment benefit but for housing benefit as well.

“There’s nothing this mob can do about this because they have signed us up to be in a political union with countries who frankly…Bulgaria and Romania are not fit to be in a political union with us. I’m not stating that political point of view from arrogance or anything like that. I can fully accept we could be in a political union with France and Germany – I don’t want us to be – but I can see why in many ways that might be a valid proposition on the table but with these former Communist east European states, countries who have not recovered..”.

So talk of a crackdown by Iain Duncan Smith was just spin?

“The improbability of what’s being said…is laughable. He was trying to stop people voting UKIP in the Eastleigh by-election. They’re terrified. It’s the biggest issue on the doorstep. I tell you why. When the Government said up to 15,000 a year from eastern Europe (would come), there are more than that in Southampton, and Eastleigh is a suburb of that. People down there are seeing social housing, a chronic problem in Eastleigh, and unskilled labourers getting jobs, just a nightmare.”

Europe, of course, or rather getting Britain out of the EU, is UKIP’s raison d’etre. When I suggest David Cameron with his promise of an in-out referendum had shot his party’s fox, the Farage eyes bulge.

“If he wins the next election, no chance; following a renegotiation, not on offer; he will give us a referendum, heard it all before; cast iron Dave, why on earth would we believe him this time round and even if he means it, we have reached the point of ‘cry wolf’, nobody else believes him. The body language, the tone, everything about that speech dripped with insincerity from start to finish.”

But it was a success politically because the putative rebellion by Conservative MPs has fizzled away, I suggest.

“They’re tribal Tories, who gives a damn about them? Forget that building over there, let’s talk about the housing estate a mile down the road, what’s the impact been three weeks on? Zero.

“Far from shooting our fox what he has done inadvertently is to legitimise everything we have said for 20 years by putting it into the mainstream national debate; that there should be a conversation on in or out and, secondly, unwittingly and without wanting to he has let the genie out of the bottle.

“Rather like with the euro once we had a public debate on the euro public opinion swung against it. It was 50-50 in the 1990s, absolutely 50-50, people like me were thinking God almighty, they’re selling us easier holidays in Spain, and maybe they’re going to carry the day. But when we had the full debate after Blair, Heseltine and Clarke launched the Britain in Europe initiative, within 18 months we had a two-to-one majority against joining the euro and it’s never changed since.

“The same is true of the bigger broader European debate, the genie is now out of the bottle, this can’t be suppressed, there is going to be a debate on all four corners of the United Kingdom over the next year or two, or over the next five years, on this issue and that from my perspective is all to the good.”

So, I suggest, that must lead to the referendum Mr Farage believes Mr Cameron, despite his promise, will not deliver.

“If UKIP closed down tomorrow, there would be no referendum ever. We could be here in 100 years. His backbenchers pose no threat to him at all. There isn’t a single Tory backbencher who has said they would vote against their prime minister in a motion of confidence, not one. If we disappear, the referendum threat goes; if we stay, the referendum threat will be maintained. I very much believe that one of UKIP’s very important jobs is to make sure that Labour make the same promise too – and they will.”

Yet he acknowledges that the PM’s speech was necessary to stop Tory MPs joining UKIP. “Had he not made that speech there would have been defections; yes, of course.”

It is when I mention Europe in the context of the Scottish independence debate that I realise I have lit the blue touch paper. The development this week with Nicola Sturgeon insisting an independent Scotland would not need to sign a full accession treaty but simply amend the current one visibly ruffles the Farage forehead.

“There’s nothing she has said on television that has impressed me. Frankly, she appears to be grossly out of her depth in the position she is in. Just for once, I’m going to go with Mr Barroso and not Nicola Sturgeon.”

He continues: “At least Irish nationalism is a pure, honest form of nationalism. Scottish nationalism, which has been a fraud committed on the Scottish electorate for the last few decades, has finally been exposed as nothing more than what has now become its own political class, seeking to justify its own existence. There is complete intellectual and economic dishonesty in the SNP’s arguments and I frankly have got no time for them at all, or her.”

Mr Farage, who has previously acknowledged a sneaking respect for Alex Salmond – who has passed his ‘would I have a pint with this person’ test – says the First Minister played a good hand on independence “up until he was exposed”.

He explains: “For a couple of decades, he played the hand incredibly well. He sold a completely false argument to the Scots, that you could leave Westminster and be independent and, in a little after-breath, be part of the EU.

“Gradually as time has gone on, it has become clearer and clearer to people in Scotland that being in the EU is completely inconsistent with the concept of independence and what sealed it is the European Commission President making clear that if you left the UK you have to reapply and sign a treaty that commits you to joining the euro.

“So that’s what’s changed everything and frankly the sheer dishonesty, the twists and turns, and the hiding of the report and all the things the SNP have done, they’re doing themselves electorally huge damage.”

So where does this leave the SNP’s campaign for independence?

“It’s finished already. I don’t think the SNP proposal of Scottish independence as part of the EU flies, works, is logical; it’s done, it’s dead in the water. Far too many canny Scots have worked that out.

“If the SNP is able to reposition itself between now and the referendum, we can have this conversation again, but at the minute they appear to be in such a muddle and backtracking on everything, from the currency to the sovereign to…some idea this could be a treaty amendment, no, the irrationality of their position has been exposed.”

I ask if he will, given his forthright pro-UK views, be an asset to the No campaign? He replies he will not be part of it.

“That’s for Scottish UKIP to get involved in, it’s not for me to get involved in. If I’m asked to speak in a university debate, I probably would. Am I going to be touring round Scotland in a referendum campaign on Scottish independence? No. UKIP Scotland can do that. I don’t see that as my role particularly.”

Yet UKIP is regarded as the Nigel Farage Party?

“Look, I have given, in so many ways, maybe illogically, the best years of my adult life in trying to make this point of view and this political brand an accepted, mainstream, genuine part of national British political debate.

“I’ve no idea why I’ve done it. I can’t explain it. It didn’t fit into my life plan at all. I’ve just done it and I’ve probably got more drive, more energy and more belief than most people who walk through the front door.

“But I couldn’t have done it on my own. I couldn’t have done it without thousands of activists and lots of people…There is a team of people behind Nigel that help to make this work now and without whom it couldn’t have worked.”

A politician referring to themselves in the third person is always interesting but, given the party’s rising star, is he regretting not standing in Eastleigh?

“No. If Diane James does win, you boys will not go on saying we’re a one-man party; that’ll be ended. That blows a hole in that.

“It’s my stated aim that I intend to lead this party as an active candidate into the European elections in 2014 and I want to cause an earthquake. I can’t do that as a backbencher in the House of Commons.

“If we’re going to get the momentum for something remarkable to happen in 2015, it can’t happen without a big success in 2014 and right now at this moment in time, it could change, I’m the best qualified person in UKIP to lead that charge in 2014.”

Soon, UKIP will be moving out of Europe House and into spanking new offices off Bond Street; the party’s fortunes, it seems, are moving upmarket.

To view the original interview CLICK HERE

With no Ukip presence here,

Farage’s politics lack credibility

 
Friday 22 February 2013

I read, with a sense of incredulity, Nigel Farage’s seemingly scathing attack upon the Scottish Government and the independence referendum (“Farage: Independence dead in the water”, The Herald, February 21).

One may go as far as to assert that at times Mr Farage’s tone was a trifle arrogant. It is surely inconceivable for one to take any credence from what the man has said in the article, when he and his party currently have no seats in Westminster or Holyrood and the rise of Ukip remains to be seen. Undoubtedly, Mr Farage would justify his assertions by highlighting that recent opinion polls may have tended to illustrate a slight support for Ukip in some parts of England and a small proportion in Scotland, in light of the current Coalition and the contentious issue of membership of the European Union.

It is easy for Mr Farage to pour scorn upon the Scottish Government (indeed the UK Government for that matter) as the United Kingdom has, thus far, no experience of his Ukip party as a source of accountable authority.

It will be extremely captivating to observe if Mr Farage’s aspirations amount to what he desires regarding his share of the electorate (especially in Scotland) and how he would put that into practice over a raft of issues, other than the aforementioned issue of severing membership of the EU.

At this stage I don’t envisage anywhere near the sort of landslide victory the SNP enjoyed in the 2011 Holyrood election, or Labour enjoyed in the 1997 General Election, unless something goes drastically wrong with the four main parties in Scotland.

John G McMenemy,

Braeside Avenue,

Milngavie.

I welcome Nigel Farage’s intervention in the independence debate; with friends like him, the No campaign certainly needs no enemies. His remarks, especially about the Deputy First Minister, seem to be based on nothing more than ignorance and prejudice.

Are bluster and assertion really all that is on offer from the opponents of Scottish independence? Where is the much-trumpeted “positive case for the Union”?

The almost daily predictions of impending disaster that would follow a Yes vote from the mainstream UK parties are bad enough, with Mr Farage and Ukip, however, the dissembling and bombast are even more transparent.

If I were a showman I’d say, “Nice try, Nigel, but no coconut!”

David C Purdie,

12 Mayburn Vale,

Loanhead, Midlothian.

It was disappointing to note personal attacks on Nicola Sturgeon by Ukip’s Nigel Farage, a clear act of desperation that has lowered the tone of the independence debate.

Mr Farage’s optimism in putting up Ukip candidates at the next European and Parliamentary elections in Scotland is totally misplaced.

At every election he pledges this will mark a breakthrough for his party in Scotland, but it never transpires.

At the last European Parliamentary elections in 2009 Ukip came second in the UK, securing just under 17% of the vote and securing 13 MEPs.

In Scotland, however, it came behind the Greens in sixth place with just over 5% of the vote. At the last Scottish Parliamentary election in 2011 Ukip achieved less than 1% of the vote.

While this Little Englander party has had success south of the Border, where the majority want the UK to leave the EU, in Scotland this position is reversed with the majority wanting to remain within the largest single market in the world.

Ukip in England has forced Mr Cameron into an in-out referendum on UK membership of the EU, but its isolationist agenda has only ever seen it inhabit the fringes of Scottish politics, where it is destined to remain.

Alex Orr,

77 Leamington Terrace,

Edinburgh.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Clearly some have swallowed Nigel Farage’s duplicitous claims as with Alex Orr above who believes Nigel Farage’s party had something to do with Cameron’s fudged and untrustworthy offer of a Referendum. Neither Nigel Farage nor his rump of a party with no elected individuals of any note, character or gravitas and out of a total of over 19,500 electable offices in UK Governance with less than 30 elected to any office of consequence after 20 years.

It may be of interest to those who have swallowed his propaganda that Nigel Farage had not even signed the UK wide petition in favour of a Referendum devised, organised, collected and delivered by Nikki Sinclaire’s Team that has delivered over 1/4 Million valid and verified signatures to Downing Street and Parliament at Westminster, that forced the debate in Parliament that gave rise to David Cameron’s second guarded promise of a Referendum.

I do concede that Nigel Farage and his clique and their vociferous claque did much to try to sabotage the efforts and assist The EU!

I am also happy to concede that in a shameful example of ‘Band Wagon Jumping’, so true to style, Nigel Farage grudgingly signed the petition AFTER the event!

May I also remind readers and researchers that under the aegis of Nigel Farage, David Lott & Mark Croucher over £1/4M was raised to mount a petition but no such petition was ever presented nor any mechanism set up for its presentation, nor was any accounting of the money raised ever presented and many are of the belief that Nigel; Farage, Davbid Lott & Mark Croucher stole the money for their own benefit!

Clearly, with his ambivalence, posturing and irrelevance in Scotland Nigel Farage and his party have done much to alienate Scottish voter, hence the risible results they have consistently had in Scotland (or for that matter in any area of UK Domestic politics!)

Per exempio:

Ukip warns Scots: ‘don’t expect British cash’

Tom Gordon
Scottish Political Editor
Sunday 23 December 2012

THE leader of the UK Independence Party (Ukip) has warned Alex Salmond he would be “naive in the extreme” to assume the rest of the UK would simply wave through a generous exit package for Scotland in the event of a Yes vote in 2014.

Nigel Farage MEP, whose fiery Euroscepticism has helped his party overtake the Liberal Democrats in recent polls, said the people of England, Wales and Northern Ireland would not want to hand over a “fat cheque” if Scotland chose to quit the UK.

He told the Sunday Herald he had no issue with Scotland deciding its own destiny, but that this was not the same as granting the First Minister’s every wish in negotiations with Westminster.

If there was a Yes vote, talks between Edinburgh and London – including those on how to divide the UK’s assets and the national debt – would start during the 2015 General Election campaign. If Ukip pushed for the rest of the UK to get the best deal possible for its citizens it would upset Salmond’s hopes of a smooth transition, and might mean David Cameron taking a similar hard line for fear of losing more Tory voters to Ukip.

Farage said: “It seems to me a remarkably naive approach for the SNP to think a post-independence rump government of the UK would just say ‘Tally ho chaps, here’s a big cheque’.

“It may be that people like Mr Cameron, Mr Miliband and Mr Clegg would like that to happen.

“But can you imagine the reaction from the English electorate? It would show yet again how out of touch they are in the political class.

“There would be an enormous political reaction, and not just in the Tory shires, but across the country. If they think gay marriage is an issue, it will pale into insignificance compared to that.

“While the political class might want to pat Alex Salmond on the back, there’s absolutely no way that the people of Wales, England and Northern Ireland would be happy with that – of course they wouldn’t.

“And to think that they might just ignore it is daft. It’s naive in the extreme.”

Although a Little Englander approach would finish Ukip in Scotland, no party with UK in its name was ever likely to be particularly active in Scotland after a Yes vote.

The SNP described Farage’s comments as “bizarre”.

A spokesman said: “Scotland already more than pays its own way, and on independence will inherit its share of the assets and liabilities of the UK.

“Ukip has repeatedly failed to make any impression in Scottish politics, which is no surprise given Mr Farage seems so out of touch.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

2 Responses to ““Farage’s politics lack credibility””

  1. timberland men's white ledge boot review said

    I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the
    layout of your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

    Like

  2. Rogalski said

    I discovered your blog website on google and test a couple of of your early posts. Continue to keep up the superb operate. I simply additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to studying more from you later on!…

    Like

We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse. No comment has EVER been barred or deleted which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual. You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner. We welcome genuine comments.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: