UKIP’s unprofessional lack of political understanding!
.
Please Be Sure To .
. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
To Spread The Facts World Wide
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
UKIP’s unprofessional lack of political understanding has led them into many pitfalls!
The lack of political gravitas, even knowledge, has beguiled them into the idiocy of laying claim to being Libertarian!!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
clearly UKIP has virtually no understanding of political doctrines, which has led them into the oft made proud boast of being Libertarian – Under no circumstances can UKIP be presented as Libertarian and all too often it would seem they have confused Libertarian with libertine, in the light of the louche behaviour and sadly often lewd behaviour of their leadership clique and its immediate claque of paid supporters.
The unprofessionalism of UKIP is all too often seen in the manner in which these self serving clowns rig their own elections and their overt support for racism, anti homosexuality, anti Judaism, xenophobia and criminality all seemingly in the interest of self enrichment.
The selection process and appointments are all centrally controlled either by Nigel Farage or those he has employed or engineered into position thus it is clear where ‘The Buck Stops’.
Olly Neville was an openly de3clared Libertarian, in the true sense of extremist behaviour with a record for self publicity and outspoken stupidity. Yet due to UKIP’s utter unprofessionalism he was selected by the pretence for leadership within UKIP as chairman of their heavily controlled Yoof wing – a recipe for disaster.
Even in his own election statement was clear appare4nt advocacy of incest thinly masked as ‘only for debate’ yet due to lack of professionalism UKIP’s pretence at leadership failed to realise their folly and sanctioned his appointment.
Yes they have summarily dismissed him from his elected post but that has done little to prevent his name and his childish shock comments from being for ever linked to UKIP!
To QUOTE today’s Telegraph:
Former Ukip youth leader asks: What is wrong with necrophilia?
Olly Neville, who was the leader of Ukip’s youth wing until this month, defends sexual intercourse with dead bodies.
Tim Walker. Edited by Richard Eden
Olly Neville, who was the leader of Ukip’s youth wing until earlier this month, has written an article in praise of sexual intercourse with dead bodies. “What is wrong with necrophilia?” is the title of the piece, which he wrote for the Backbencher, a “libertarian” online magazine.
To view the quote in its original format CLICK HERE
What is wrong with Necrophilia?
Olly Neville January 29, 2013 9
In the first part of ‘What is wrong with’, I looked at the moral and practical justification (or lack thereof) for the current ban on consensual incest. Today, I take one murky step further into the realms of unpleasant sexual acts with a look at what is wrong with Necrophilia.Necrophilia does not have some of the ‘problems’ that incest faced. There is no real prospect of pregnancy or any of the issues related with that. However, it does face what is at first glance the larger issue that the person you are having sex with is dead, so can’t consent. One of the big arguments for incest was that it was consensual, so surely this barrier halts those with a corpse fetish dead in their tracks (excuse the pun).
This is in fact not necessarily the case; consent can be given. I’ll add a general caveat here despite the fact that those that wish to be offended/sickened won’t read and won’t care about it. Legalising necrophilia does not mean legalising having random sex with any corpse you want – just like legal sex doesn’t mean you can sleep with any person you want.
Consent can be given by the owner of the corpse. When someone dies they no longer can own property – they pass on their belongings to a person or persons of their choosing. Your body is another one of your belongings, clearly you own your body in life but as you can’t own it when you cease to exist, it, like all other possessions, is inherited by the person you specify. It becomes their corpse.
At the moment people allow their organs to be taken and transplanted on death, their bodies used for medical science. I see no problem in an individual donating or selling their body to a necrophiliac. But going further (which is where people will probably disagree with me) I believe that once you have given your body to someone it is theirs to do with as they wish. If they want to sell it on so be it. If a body is just another possession in that it can be owned like any other, and used like any other.
This, of course, can be avoided by having your inheritee sign a contract – probably with your lawyers – that they will do with your body as you require, as a condition on inheriting it and anything else. In most cases if you want your body buried or cremated your loved ones will do it, rather than have sex with it. But if you are truly distrusting, a contract can ease your fears.
So consensual necrophilia is possible, getting agreement from the person before death, or from the owner of a corpse who inherited it without being required to not sell it on. Of course necrophilia poses other problems such as diseases, but banning it for this reason opens up a can of worms in regard to whether you can ban things because the person doing it might hurt themselves. Having normal sex can cause disease, base jumping is likely to see you hurt. Necrophilia can be no more banned due to risk of disease than rugby can be banned due to risk of broken bones.
I would be interested to hear people’s views on whether a body can be treated as a possession. Despite many people’s attachment to their bodies and their natural squeamishness at the prospect of people having sex with a corpse, neither desiring a body not to be property, nor disgust at the implications makes it not so. Necrophilia is pretty disgusting a concept, which is why most people don’t do it, but here like in any case – as JS Mill said:
“If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”
What is wrong with a voluntarily, consensual sexual coupling? What is wrong with Necrophilia?
To read the original half baked article CLICK HERE
Are we to believe that UKIP might professionalise and show a more mature and competent side in the future? Well sadly not as their lack of leadership and self indulgent stupidity has been a stock in trade for many years, hence there are very few informed individuals who take them remotely seriously and they pose their greatest threat; not as the dellusionally claim, to The Tories as in the next breath they claim to take votes from all parties alike (few as that may be!) but more realistically their crass antics and lack of any political gravitas does the most harm to The EUroSceptic movement and those who wish to Leave-The-EU.
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
to Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
TWITTER: Greg_LW
Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
Ukip-vs-EUkip 
We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse. No comment has EVER been barred or deleted which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual. You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner. We welcome genuine comments.