January 2026
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
	1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Archive for the ‘UKIP’ Category

#96* – Don’t study Maggots Without A Strong Stomach!!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 28/10/2008

#96* – Don’t study Maggots Without A Strong Stomach!!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership & NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Hi,

Firstly may I take this opportunity of thanking Len Baynes for having the good grace and integrity to publicly appologise for having dishonestly made an accusation against me and when challenged and finding he was unable to substantiate his claim he had the wisdom and fundamental decency to withdraw his false and unfounded accusation and appologise.

Thank – you Len and as far as I am concerned the matter is not only history but is accepted as being an error that is as if it had never happened and may I wish you good luck in your efforts to clean up EUkip and make it electable for people of integrity in the best way you see fit.Unfortunately it would seem that Bruce Lawson is, unlike Len Baynes, a fool without integrity, short of morality and utterly untrustworthy as proven by his abuse, harassment and bullying threats which he was neither man enough to substantiate nor wise enough to apologise for.

Bruce Lawson is clearly a pompous self important self imprest pratt who whilst Treasurer of EUkip failed in his claimed intent, abrogated on his duty and has proved untrustworthy having published confidential correspondence written and received in a position of trust as Treasurer – a duty and responsibility he freely accepted yet betrayed by publishing confidential material on his wersonal web site under the guise of UKIP – Mr. Lawson you are no gentleman and not to be trusted even amongst the odious scum that would seem to have floated to the top of EUkip.

Having been proven a bully and dishonest you have clearly failed to have the integrity to appologise when proven in the wrong – may I suggest that you stick to impressing yourself in the shaving mirror for the standard of behaviour you have displayed impresses no individual or integrity or morality and falls far short of the behaviour any gentleman would have the right to expect.Both EUkip & UKIP are well rid of you and it is to be hoped you never bring your contemptible lack of morality to the body politic ever again as it befould the aims of liberty and the values we seek to re-establish in Britain.

On the matter of irresponsibility and EUkip being brought into disrepute one need look no further than a letter I received from the NEC late this evening wherein it is clear that in its irresponsibility EUkip’s leadership and NEC bring the party into disrepute by failing to act with decency, integrity and morality – this time in the matter of refunding the money quite clearly owed to John West – in as far as it was obtained from him and EVERY other EUkip candidate in the dishonest selection of those the leadership wanted appointed on their list of MEP candidates.

That the process was dishonest is clear in two very clear aspects:

Christopher Gill the ex Tory MP was appointed to oversee the application phase and he utterly failed to acquit his duty and then like a pussy cat rolled on his back to oblige the leadership – having dishonourably failed to acquit his duty both in deserting his post to suit HIS convenience supposedly/claimed on holiday and also displaying his utter incompetence by failing expeditiously to answer correspondence and failing in his duty of care under the law relative to The Data Protection Act or the control of the staff working for him.

Christopher Gill’s behaviour was nothing less than shamefull and a disgrace and any man of calibre would have had the integrity to tender his irrevocable resignation having brought EUkip into such disrepute.

2.)
We must consider the selection process as irrelevant and invalid as shown by The Returning Officer, the facts I have published and the mailings of Ms. Lynnda Robson & Mr. Robin Page.

Clearly the positions of such as:
Bannerman (a Fraud, liar and cheat employed by the EU!),
Tiny Tim Whatzit (Resident in Portugal and thus not fulfilling requirements),
Ms. Andreassen (an alien with no plausible interest in Britain beyond the money scammed from EUkip, a track record of being pro. EU, resident in Barcelona, Spain and having failed to comply with the rules)

WHERE WAS GILL? It was Gill’s DUTY to oversee a fair & just selection process – Gill FAILED as has been made very clear.

CONSIDER:

Letter 01:

Date: Monday, 20 October, 2008, 5:00 PM
For the attention of the Party Chairman
Copied to the NEC

Dear Mr Nuttall,

I am still waiting for the return of my £250 deposit. In a previous email to you I requested the return of this money as it was obtained under false pretences. The MEP selection process was clearly unfair, dishonest and rigged to benefit certain individuals. The report on the MEP section/ election process written by Piers Merchant, the Returning Officer, proves this beyond doubt.

Indeed, he recommended that a special committee be appointed to investigate the whole selection process in the East. The NEC’s failure to follow his advice is simply another example of how it has brought the Party into disrepute by failing to deal with the corruption and dishonesty that now threatens to destroy UKIP.

Unfortunately, rather than deal with the genuine concerns raised by myself and others it apparently now plans to conduct a witch-hunt in order to remove those of us who have had the courage to fight for honesty, accountability, decency and transparency. How very EU! If the Party should decline to co-operate I will have no choice but to follow the steps taken by Lynnda Robson and take legal action. I am now in contact with Ipswich County Court. Unless I receive a cheque for £250, plus £20 interest, within seven days I will instigate legal proceedings against UKIP.

Yours sincerely,
John West
Chairman UKIP Ipswich & East Suffolk
Secretary UKIP Suffolk CoastalLetter

Letter 02:

Subject: Re: Legal action against UKIP
To: johnwest81@hotmail.com

Dear John

After taking legal advice, the party has concluded that you have no right to ask for the return of £250.

Best wishes
Paul Nuttall

Letter 03:

Subject: RE: Legal action against UKIP
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:12:27 +0000

Dear Paul,

I am saddened that you are prepared to listen to misguided legal advice from, I presume, Michael Zuckerman.

You will be aware that your own returning officer’s report ( now in the public domain) expressed grave concerns about the selection process and recommended that a sub-committee be appointed to investigate the whole matter. The NEC, of course, ignored his recommendations. It is quite clear that the whole selection process was rigged to favour certain candidates.

What saddens me is your willingness to go along with this corruption and dishonesty. You did tell me upon becoming chairman that you would be ‘a new broom’. You forgot to mention that you would be using the same handle! You have already conceded your liability to refund the money by refunding Lynnda Robson’s deposit, plus costs. If the selection process had been fair the leadership would have contested her claim in court. You also returned Robin Page’s deposit for the same reason.

Paul, your response is wholly inadequate. May I suggest that you obtain competent legal advice from someone other than Michael Zuckerman as both my wife and I will be taking UKIP to the Small Claims Court.

Yours sincerely,
John West
Chairman UKIP Ipswich & East Suffolk
Secretary UKIP Suffolk Coastal

Letter 04:

Subject: FW: Legal action against UKIP
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:33:12 +0000

Dear Paul,

I have now issued a county court claim against UKIP.

You gave me no other choice.

Yours sincerely,
John West

CONCLUSION:

I presume that John West has lodged a statement in full and also has lodged the supportive evidence of the rules AND the Returning Officer’s very clear report placed in the public domain.

It will be noted that to prove the process was fair John West is entitled to demand copies of the cheques paid by EVERY other member with proof their check was cleared, also the CRB checks for each and every applicant should be lodged in confidence with the Court together with proof of their residency and voter role entry.

I understand Lynnda Robson made such an application and it would seem EUkip leadership knew they would loose through the Courts for EVERY entrant in the failed process and not only refunded Lynnda Robson’s £250.00 but also have paid her expenses.

Similarly I understand that £250.00 was paid to Robin Page as the first acceptance of fault on their part and as the first stage in such claims for damages he will eventually seek! In that Robin Page was within 4 votes of election at the last EU Election and this only because it seems Tom Wise abused his access to the membership lists and self promotion in his EU employed capacity at the time. This time there is no competent candidate notable in the Eastern Region and thus it would be reasonable then, I presume, for Robin Page to make damages claim for the loss of potential income as an MEP!!!

This may be fanciful but you must be aware that the lead candidate will not be able to stand eventually as he has brought EUkip into disrepute as a fraud, a liar, a cheat having proved a failure in the Tories he came to EUkip based upon lies and dishonesty which befoul the reputation of EUkip – this he has compounded by taking a job with the EU with an undertaking to act in a manner directly contra his position with EUkip. As the realisation that he is beneath contempt in his exploitation of EUkip for his personal gain integrity will overcome pity on the part of EUkip and he will have no option but to resign – even based on his corrupt morality!

The number 2 is Stuart Agnew and he has openly made it clear he intends to exploit the job for his own gain and considers his absolute right to election claiming directly that he has bought the position. Further he is aware that he is taking advantage of dishonesty – a contemptible little bully of a man with no integrity and the bombast of a fool.

No. 4 in the Region is Andrew Smith who is on EVERY count unsuitable – it was his indisputable dishonest abrogation of duty that has led to a guilty verdict against EUkip for having endeavoured to cheat the Electoral Commission, it is his dishonesty that makes EUkip at risk of forfeiture and costs of around £500,000 in a Judicial Review. Further it was Andrew Smith who as Treasurer failed to acquit his professional duties and resign when faced by some 20+ questions relative to his duties which proved beyond doubt he had acted dishonourably and contra the simplest of professional competence as a book keeper let alone the Party Accountant/Treasurer – Andre Smith also failed to protect EUkip from the debts and liabilities of call centres considered by many members to be corrupt.

I would contend if EUkip were to have a candidate elected in June 2009 there is little doubt that had EUkip complied with democratic process, which the Returning Officer attests it was not – Robin Page would be an MEP in June – Just what do YOU believe will be the level of damages in the Courts minded of the damage to Robin Page as a journalist by the loss of this position?Interestingly having spoken with both the Police and the DPA there is every intention that they WILL be vigerously prosecuting enquiry and subsequent due process in the matter of the publishing of material of a confidential nature on YouTube with regard to John West.

The cowardly and dishonourable action of John Wittacker in signing the dishonest letter regarding the foul mouthed slut Annabelle Fuller (Those who feel I may be harsh in branding this sordid slut thus might care to view her pathetic and obscene childish Blog!).

Wittacker may well have lied as Chairman and subsequently resigned having felt he was forced to sign the lies by Farage but I doubt he would lie under oath in Court when the time comes – probably around April on next year.

Then after the guilty verdicts against EUkip and its leadership and NEC there will no doubt be the open and shut damages case that could run well towards 6 figures for reasons which will become apparent in the fullness of time!On the matter of LAW – I am given to believe that the Police have failed to let Tom Wise the EUkip MEP off the hook for fraud, embezzling and money laundering as a liar in abuse of his position of trust as made clear in the media.

I do not know as yet whether Lindsay Jenkins will be charged or whether they will consider her too irrelevant and merely a rather foolish woman impressed by a younger man! Tom Wise was I am reliably informed due to surrender to bail to the Police on Wednesday 29-Oct-08 – However I understand he has announced, confirming what I had heard previously, that The Police have had ‘words’ with him and have shown they have more than a passing interest!

The Police I understand have extended the Bail Period for a further 3 months.

I do NOT personally believe that this action indicates the Police do not intend to charge and prosecute in the long run – I shall therefore NOT publish the documentary evidence I hold at this stage copies of which have been provided to the Police – I believe that there is reason to believe that since the Police have evidence that they consider to make the case open and shut as we understand it – I believe the extension of bail is because they have as a result of this case opened the edge of a MUCH larger case which they do not wish to damage by moving too soon on the larger and more serious issue.

It I was Trevor Colman I would not sleep easy in view of the corruption in which he participated to use his status as a retired Police Officer to orchestrate a cover-up of the criminality of Tom Wise as made public and as a result of Trevor Colman’s shameful dishonesty it led to collusion in the criminality of Tom Wise as known by the leadership and NEC at the time colluding in the cover-up. I appreciate it does seem that Trevor Colman has benefited from his dishonesty, weakness, corruption and prostitution of his Queen’s Commission – both in the pecuniary gain of his partner/mistress Sue Palfrey and also in his seeming reward by being placed in the position of MEP – shame on EUkip that they see this as seemly behaviour for their representatives – though I do appreciate they are well off in having rid themselves of the liar and low life Graham Booth a man of very little merit who went so far as to try to parachute his clearly unsuitable relative into his job – I guess since her only notable claim was her relationship to the odious Booth and claims that her hobby of parachuting was any better or more relevant qualification than knitting or gardening!

The members of EUkip are well shot of the liar and all round nebbish Graham Booth but surely they did not deserve to have him replaced by the corrupt and bent copper Trevor Colman – surely even EUkip have SOMEONE of better calibre in the South West – the list is risible for next June.EUkip seek votes for election to run/represent our Country – what a shameful display of competence they have made of running their own Party – Clearly until EUkip is cleaned up and re-structured no individual of integrity would wittingly vote for them.

I call Farage DIRECTLY to account – on the hustings whilst his staff were cheating and publishing lies to keep they snouts in the trough as with the ex and much failed Press Officer a proven liar and cheat – Do you deny Nigel Farage that time and again you made the proud and dishonest boast that it was essential members voted for you as if you were elected there were various senior Tory MPs who had undertaken to join EUkip under your leadership and there were various individuals willing to put up big money to back the party the moment you became leader.Despite the many witnesses do you deny these lies?

Nigel Farage having lied to get yourself elected perhaps you would care to apologise for your lies and admit you are, as I stated at the time, incompetent to lead the party, without the gravitas and not trusted having gathered around yourself spivs, chavs, liars, cheats, frauds and failures it does not in fact elevate your position it shows the calibre of those who you can afford to buy.

Nigel Farage other than as a rather lightweight affable performing monkey can you identify a single solitary area of competence you bring to leadership other than as a rather glib and shallow barrow boy who trades on myths of success from almost 20 years ago in a City boom you rode briefly as a gambler.

Nigel Farage you have brought little but shame on EUroScepticism almost no publicity of gravitas and virtually no leaflets of calibre, no training, no credible structure and a collection of VERY low grade acolytes as praise singers. You have not eben produced sufficient men of stature to form an NEC risible puppets and parasites who would be unable to hold down a meaningfull position of power and stature.

By the way there has been so many letters leaked to me from the NEC in attempts to clean up EUkip that I do appologise to those who are sending them _ I regret I can not publish them all and also PLEASE accept my judgement as there are some that I believe would not help and may well unfairly damage so those I will withhold at the moment – there are lots more to come.

To come full circle – let us hope Farage and others have the stature and integrity of Len Baynes who was man enough to apologise when he made a mistake rather than continue to emulate the shabby and cowardly behaviour as displayed by Bruce Lawson who acted in a manner so redolent of EUkip’s leadership and MEPs – a coward, a bully, untrustworthy and with no political merit – merely an inflated opinion of himself as with the low lifes and nere do wells that sadly represent EUkip all too often! Follow Lawson’s lead and run away PLEASE give UKIP a chance!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

MAY I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU

Posted in Andrew SMITH, EUkip, Fuller, Graham Booth, Lawson; Agnew; Farage; Nuttall; Wittaker, Len Baynes, Lindsay JENKINS, Robin Page; John West;, Tom WISE, Trevor Colman, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

Steven WOOLFE Not Seemingly The Catch he is SOLD AS!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 21/02/2008

Steven WOOLFE Not Seemingly The Catch he is SOLD AS!
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

I found this article about Steven Woolfe of interest and can only assume it is the Steven Woolfe UKIP leadership have positioned on their anti democratic selection list as candidate for London – presumably a drinking buddy of the self serving and dishonest, self serving, unprofessional chavs who lead UKIP – from one disaster to another!

Ex-councillor fails to return laptop and £200

Feb 21 2008 by Owen R Hughes, North Wales Weekly News

A SACKED councillor who claimed thousands of pounds in allowances despite not attending a meeting for six months has still not returned his laptop to the council.

Tory Steven Woolfe, 39, was kicked off Conwy County Council in September 2007 after failing to attend a single meeting since March. He had claimed around £20,000 in allowances over 18 months after winning a by-election in Colwyn Bay’s Rhiw ward in March 2006.

Now the council has revealed that his laptop, which are presented to all members, remains outstanding, along with £200 he owes the council.

Conwy County Council told the Weekly News that arrangements had been made for the return of the Hi-Grade Notino AS1400 laptop, but then admitted it had no contact number for the ex-councillor, who is thought to have left the area.

LibDem Cllr Trevor Stott, who was elected to replace Mr Woolfe last November, said: “People are concerned about whether the money paid to Mr Woolfe has been repaid and also whether council property has been returned.

“It was tax payers’ money he was paid and they want to know if he has paid any back. I would be interested to know if he will return the laptop as well.”

The Weekly News was told the allowance paid to Mr Woolfe while he was a councillor could not be claimed back and that he had made no voluntary repayments.

But a spokesman added: “Arrangements have been made for the return of a laptop and we are in the process of recovering a small amount, less than £200, that is due to the authority.”

Plaid Cllr Phil Edwards said: “The council should be taking all steps necessary to recover a laptop from any councillor who is no longer a member.

“These are expensive pieces of equipment and even more costly than a standard laptop due to the fact they have additional security software installed. If he still has a laptop it means someone else on the council is missing out.

“I also believe Mr Woolfe should pay back the allowance he claimed after March 2007 when he clearly decided he would no longer attend meetings. If he will not pay back that money then the Conservative party should make up the shortfall.”

Manchester-born Mr Woolfe pledged to help transform the Bay when elected in 2006, claiming the town was perceived as dirty and unsafe. He was made a member of the council’s audit committee as well as the environmental and community wellbeing scrutiny committees.

But between March 23 and September 23 2007 he failed to attend a single meeting, which resulted in him automatically forfeiting the seat.

Cllr Keith Toy, leader of the local Conservatives, said the Woolfe affair was a “sad history” and that council procedures needed to be tightened to ensure it would never happen again.

“The party tried to take action at the time, but the real fault lies in a system which says councillors only need to attend two meetings over a six month period to receive their allowance,” he said. “I’d much prefer we go back to the system where members are given an allowance based on the hours and work they put in.”

A council spokesman confirmed the laptop had been purchased in 2002, and the warranty expired in 2005: “It will cost us money to decommission it but it’s council property, therefore we require that it is returned,” she said.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

There are other articles:

An apology to Cllr Steven Woolfe – North Wales Weekly News

Aug 14, 2008 … IN an article headed “Councillor in expenses enquiry” published on October 4, 2007, we reported that Mr Woolfe resigned from Conwy County …

http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/…/an-apology-to-cllr-steven–woolfe– 55243-21528661/

Ex-councillor fails to return laptop and £200 – North Wales Weekly …

Feb 21, 2008 … Tory Steven Woolfe, 39, was kicked off Conwy County Council in September 2007 after failing to attend a single meeting since March. He had …

http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/…/ex-councillor-fails-to-return-laptop- and-200-50142-20501604/

It’s our money – North Wales Weekly News

Feb 28, 2008 … I AGREE former Tory county councillor Steven Woolfe should return his council- owned laptop computer.

http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/…/it-s-our-money-50142-20531519/

14 August 2008 – Conwy County news, Llandudno, Colwyn Bay …

Aug 14, 2008 … An apology to Cllr Steven Woolfe Aug 14 2008. IN an article headed “Councillor in expenses enquiry” published on October 4, 2007, we …

http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/conwy-county-news/…/14/

Articles from August 2008 – North Wales Weekly News

Feb 5, 2011 … An apology to Cllr Steven Woolfe. 00:08, Aug 14 2008; Conwy County News · True taste of France. 00:08, Aug 14 2008; Conwy County News …

http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/2008/08/

ADDITION MADE:

So despite the way he has been presented by UKIP leadership it seems Steven Woolfe is just another untrustworthy failed Tory.We understand that he is currently a redundant ‘compliance clerk’ for a City firm!

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU

Not UKIP’s Finest Hour as Cllr. Potts shows the way! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
I Believe UKIP IS Anti Homosexual (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
Derek Clark UKIP MEP Disbands Committee to cover his lies! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP MEP Gerard BATTEN, UKIP & Gregory LAUDER-FROST (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
The Current Plight of UKIP (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP’s Catastrophic Hubris & Dishonesty (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
More Thoughts & Facts on UKIP’s Abject Failure! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP Expecting Catastrophic Domestic Election Results (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
First she came for the Homosexuals & now she has come for the Muslims! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
Nigel Farage & the mediocre squalor of UKIP (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
Seems Gerard Batten NOT Found Guilty! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP’s EU Funded Hypocricy (ukip-vs-eukip.com)

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: Claque, London, NEC, Steven WOOLFE, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

Ashley MOTE MEP Trial – A UKIP Summary

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 17/08/2007

Ashley MOTE MEP Trial – A UKIP Summary
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Ashley MOTE MEP Trial – A UKIP Summary!

Nigel Farage instructed staff, paid for by UKIP to sit in court to ensure control of the subsequent publicity.

Yet he took absolutely no meaningfull action when Tom Wise was being investigated for outright fraud and embezzlement whilst in office, aided by the Tory Lindsey Jenkins!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

at The Palace of Westminster
appending the signatures of the 25 Barons,

directly descended from those who signed The Magna Carta,

to the petition of S.A.Ni.Ty.

of The Magna Carta Society

L > R

Ashley MOTE, Malcolm WOOD
Barry Lord ASHDOWN
Greg LANCE-WATKINS

COURT COVERAGE OPINION D.S-C.

you should note in reading this that David Samuel-Camps (Nigel Farage’s constituency office manager) was salaried by UKIP to attend the case from Nigel Farage’s personal office and write a suitable report.

You may also wish to note that Nigel Farage had turned the trial of Ashley Mote, for an offence long prior to his joining UKIP, into an apparently personal vendetta.

Crown v Ashley Mote

(16 July – 17 August 2007)
A Summary

To the best of our knowledge and belief the following has been written,
on the basis that it is a fair, accurate and impartial account of the
proceedings, in front of a jury, as instructed by His Honour Judge Price.
In a trial that lasted for four weeks Ashley Mote faced twenty-five indictments.
Nine related to False Accounting; nine for Obtaining Money Transfers by
Deception; one for Failure to Notify Change of Circumstances; six for Evasion
of Liability by Deception (this refers to Council Tax, but did not involve Mote
receiving monies).
The case revolved around claims for Income Support, Housing Benefit and
evasion of liability of Council Tax from 1996 to 2002, whilst he was in receipt
of personal income, which he failed to declare to the Benefits Agency as
required by law.
Chichester District Council Housing Benefits department and the Department
of Work and Pensions (DWP) alleged that he had received £73,000 in
benefits to which he was not entitled, during that period.
The prosecution called a number of officials from the Housing Benefits
department to explain how the benefit system works. Prior to the trial, the
defence said it would accept their evidence, but would raise some queries.
The defence asked some of these witnesses’ questions on interpretation of
what constitutes ‘income’. (The point here was that regardless of whether the
‘income’ was subject to income tax, any income should have been declared in
order that an entitlement to benefits can be correctly assessed).
Both sides employed forensic accountants and they produced agreed
schedules that were accepted by the defence and prosecution. It had also
been agreed that only one of the accountants needed to give evidence.
The prosecution mounted a very strong case and proved that Mote was a
director of a number of companies, two of which he initially denied having any
dealings with.
They also revealed that during the six years he was on benefits he received
over £10,500 as a tax-free lump sum from a private pension plan, along with
annual payments of £991 before tax. He failed to declare this to the agency,
as required on the A1 and A2 benefits forms. He used part of the lump sum
to take a holiday in Barbados and to pay off some debts – again whilst still
claiming Income Support and Housing Benefit.
He also failed to declare that he was a company director. In an interview with
the DWP in 2001 he denied having any involvement with a company called
Tanner Management saying that his dealings with that company were few and
years ago, when in fact he was the director of the company. In a second
interview in March ’02 he refused to answer questions regarding Tanner
Management and in a third interview he answered “No comment” to all
questions – on legal advice.
He did not reveal to the agency that he had deposited £5000 with a financial
broker in 1993 for use in “spread betting” on the currency markets.
1
This “gambling” as it was referred to in court, brought in a substantial amount
of money over the six-year period, which he again failed to declare to the
Benefits Agency as income. His defence was that, as he did not have to
declare these “winnings” to the Inland Revenue he did not have to inform the
Benefits Agency. This despite the fact that the claims form specifically asks if
the claimant has “any other monies coming in”.
Suspicions were raised by Chichester District Council’s Housing Benefit office
when they discovered that the rent for his accommodation at Langley Court
East was greater than the amount of Housing Benefit he was receiving and
they began investigating how he was making up the difference.
They discovered that the rent for his flat was paid through a company called
Caravelle Investments Ltd and had a letter from that company stating that
they were the landlords, when in fact the landlord was an individual – Mr
James Low. Mr Low was shown the letter from Caravelle just prior to the trial
and was dismayed at its content. He had never heard of Caravelle before
and stated in evidence that his family owned the property – not Caravelle Ltd.
Also on the letter was a reference to OSS.
Mote became involved with a cleaning company in 1996, which was owned by
his wife’s cousin Miss Rance. They set up a limited company with Mote as
the company secretary. It was decided that she and Mote would have the
same “drawings” from the company; that she would look after the physical
side of business whilst Mote took care of the administration and accounts.
Each month Mote would contact Miss Rance to tell her how much she could
withdraw from the company account for herself and to cover employees’
wages. She made separate claims for ‘consumable’ expenses, such as
cleaning fluids etc. It was also agreed that the company should take out loans
to purchase cars for Mote and herself. She re-paid the loan from her own
salary, whilst Mote paid for it through his Tanner Management account. This
was shown on the company accounts as payments to Tanner Management
Ltd. Miss Rance was asked if her company had any dealings with Tanner
Management and she answered, “No, there was no reason for (the cleaning
company) to have dealings with it”
Miss Rance became worried when Mote would not tell her how much he was
drawing from the company and when she queried this with him at a meeting in
a hotel lobby, as his drawings did not appear in the company accounts, he
said that it was because “it was done in a another way”. Miss Rance then
sought advice from her own accountant who asked to her to obtain the
account books. She was invited to Langley Court and was told she could look
at the books but could not take them away – Mote had left a note to that
effect, which was produced in evidence.
Asked about credit card payments that appeared on the accounts she stated
that the company did not have any credit cards, especially an American
Express card. Asked about other payments she said she had no idea as to
what they were for or who the people were that the payments were made to.
Asked whether her company had an office, she said “No” and said that she
worked from home and she assumed that Mote did too.
However, in the accounts was an item for office rent. The prosecution asked
Miss Rance if she had trusted Mote. “Yes of course I did” she replied, “he was
family for God’s sake!”
2
It was later clarified that Mote had two credit cards and an Amex card for
personal use and was using monies from the company’s account to make
credit card payments, via his Tanner Management Ltd bank account. Miss
Rance said in evidence that £30,000 had “disappeared” from her company’s
account.
After a forensic account analysis of Mote’s bank statements, cheque stubs,
paying-in books etc, the prosecution were informed that Mote had spent over
£150,000 for the six-year period 1996-2002 whilst still claiming Income
Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax relief.
Much of Mote’s financial dealings were done through Tanner Management
Ltd. The prosecution proved that far from only having a few dealings with the
company some years ago, “Tanner Management Ltd was Ashley Mote and
Ashley Mote was Tanner Management Ltd, all the family knew that” said Miss
Rance, and that he had “lied” about this connection. Originally registered in
the Isle of Man the company was under the control of Mote who moved the
company address to a PO Box in Petersfield and rented office space in the
name of Tanner Management in same town, just six miles from where he
lived. The office rent of £235 per month was paid through the cleaning
company’s account.
Written evidence was submitted by the prosecution from various bank
officials, confirming that documents submitted by them were true and
accurate.
DWP investigators gave evidence regarding the interviews they had had with
Mote in late 2001 and 2002, and a summary of the investigations they had
undertaken.
“Agreed Facts”, with regard to benefit claims to a total of £73,041, were
submitted and accepted along with bank and credit card accounts in Mote’s
name.
On the 6th August Mote took the stand in his own defence.
He began by giving details of his working background culminating in him
setting up a company called Q International in the late ‘70s – early ‘80s. It
was a management consultancy with a staff of 30 people and offices in the
USA, Australia and the UK. He explained that the company had dealings with
multi-national corporations and was a thriving business. During this time he
met an American called Jack Tanner in Houston and because of mutual
interests, decided to set up an international property company. The company
was registered in Delaware USA and the Isle of Man as Tanner
Management,. Asked the reason for this he said it was to take advantage of
the tax regimes in those places, which was normal business practice. It was
later incorporated as a limited company
In 1989 Q International failed due to “Black Wednesday” when Britain crashed
out of the ERM. Mote was faced with financial ruin and was forced to sell his
house in order to pay off an overdraft and other creditors. He tried to find
employment during 1991 – 93 but it was “hopeless”. He then applied for
benefits but was advised that as he had been self-employed he would be
better off trying to set up another business. Asked how he had managed
financially during this period, he said “increasing debt and support from
3
friends”. He then worked abroad until 1996 until the work dried up and he
returned to the UK to look for further employment, but eventually ended up
claiming benefits.
As he had reached the age of sixty by 1996 he was now entitled to Income
Support and was not expected to be actively seeking employment.
He confirmed that all the signatures on the claims forms were his. Asked
about Caravelle Ltd he confirmed that signatures on letters from the company
were Jack Tanner’s. Asked why Caravelle was named as his landlord he said
that it was because Jack Tanner had guaranteed the rent, should there be a
shortfall if Mote was in financial difficulties, although he agreed Mr James Low
was in fact the actual landlord.
With regard to the spread betting he said he deposited £5000 with GNI
Financial Brokers in the early 1990’s, which set him up with an account with
Overseas Sterling Services (OSS). The defence then took him through the
Income Support and Housing Benefit forms to confirm that they were correct.
He was asked about cheques that he had written, but the judge did not follow
his explanation. Mote gave reasons for the cheques but did not remember
some of them as he suffered from a bad memory, a point that was raised a
few times during his evidence and cross-examination.
Asked what effect he believed his 65th birthday had had on his Income
Support he said he had missed the fact that his state pension was “topped up”
with Income Support and it did not cross his mind that he was still on benefits,
despite a letter from the Agency detailing his state pension and Income
Support entitlements.
In anticipation of a private pension transfer of £10,600 he took a holiday in
Barbados in September 2001. He said he used the balance to pay off some
debts.
He was then asked about his interviews with the DWP. In the first interview in
November 2001 he provided them with bank statements and other
information, all of which were “edited” by him. Asked why they were edited he
said that they contained personal material that was not relevant. His next
interview was in March 2002 where he read a prepared statement and
refused to answer questions regarding Tanner Management Ltd, although his
legal representative had been notified of the questions beforehand. His
Income support was stopped on 20th September 2002. He attended a third
interview on 6th November 2002 but answered all questions with “No
comment”.
The defence then asked about payments into his Abbey National account,
which Mote explained was to facilitate his benefit payments. Three character
witnesses were called to give verbal evidence along with a written statement.
Only one of the verbal witnesses was cross-examined.
Under cross-examination Mote was asked about Caravelle Investments Ltd
and OSS. Mote said that OSS was the codeword for his account with the
financial brokers, but eventually he admitted that OSS Ltd was a company
that he had set up, through his original company that crashed in 1989, and
both shared the same address as that of Tanner Management in the Isle of
Man.
4
In the forensic analysis a company called Cater Allen was mentioned. The
company is a private bank and Mote initially denied that he had an account
with them. The following day it was revealed that he had lied, as monies from
his spread betting went through that account to another of his bank accounts,
Abbey International, which Mote had also denied having any knowledge but
during the period between July 98 and September 2002 there were 5
payments of £750 and one of £1500, none of which were declared to the
Benefits Agency. Again, all this whilst he was still on benefits.
The prosecution asked for authority to obtain bank statements from Cater
Allen and Abbey International for the whole period, but Mote refused, only
allowing them access to the bank statements for 2002.
He was then asked about his mortgage application in 2004. Whilst the
prosecution acknowledged that it was outside the 1996-2002 period, they
drew attention to the fact that Mrs Mote had stated on the application form
that she had been employed by a company called ODI Services as company
secretary since 1999 on an annual salary of £12,000 plus dividends. This had
not been declared on the Income Support, Housing Benefit forms as “any
other monies coming in?” The letter from ODI Services to the mortgage
lenders confirming her employment and salary was produced in evidence,
signed by the managing director, Barnaby Mote, their son. It emerged that
the salary payments and dividends paid to Mrs Mote were then ‘gifted’ back to
Barnaby Mote. Ashley Mote stated in evidence that he no knowledge of these
arrangements.
Part way through Mote’s evidence Barnaby Mote was “interposed”, despite
objections from the prosecution. He was questioned on salary payments and
dividends to his mother and agreed that the monies had been “gifted” back to
him in order that he would not be liable for a higher rate of income tax. When
contacted by Chichester Housing Benefit office regarding Mrs Mote’s income
he sought legal and accounting advice and paid off the income tax.
On further cross-examination Ashley Mote was asked about a company called
Franklin Wines. He explained that it was an Australian company that was
trying to break into the UK wine market and that he had been asked by the
company for advice on how to go about it. The company paid him various
amounts, from £1,000 to £3,000 during the period from October to December
2002, which he considered to be expenses. It then transpired that Mote had
become a director of the company – none of which was declared to the
Benefits Agency.
The prosecution then made its closing argument and accused Mote of
“dishonesty” and “lying”; of facilitating his “lifestyle” which included bills for
restaurants, trips abroad and club membership fees.
This was done through his credit cards, which were then paid for by money
from his spread betting, money from the cleaning company and other
business activities, which he repeatedly maintained were business expenses
rather than income.
The defence’s argument was that here was a man who had been devastated
by the collapse of his successful company in the ERM crash of 1989, lost his
house and who had made every effort to find work, up until 1996.
5
Faced with the prospect of claiming benefits he had said that he did not
understand the benefit system and the consequent form filling. The defence
explained that Mote suffered from memory loss and was unable to mount a
proper defence as he had destroyed a lot of documents, due to lack of space,
following his move from Langley Court to a small flat and his MEP
commitments.
In his summing up the judge spent a great deal of time explaining the
indictments and the witness evidence. After deliberating for 10½ hours, the
jury were recalled and asked if they had reached verdicts on any of the
indictments. They were then taken through each of the indictments, 17 of
which they all agreed on as guilty, 3 not guilty and 5 undecided. They retired
again and came back with verdicts on the 5 undecided indictments – 4 guilty
and one not guilty – giving a total of 21 verdicts of guilty and 4 not guilty.
The judge thanked the jury in the usual manner and told them that they could
stay on to hear the rest of that day’s proceedings. One juror left. The judge
then told Mote that he faced a custodial sentence and that he was setting bail
at £50,000. He told him that he had to surrender his passport and not to
leave England and Wales. On being informed by the defence that Mote had
an EU diplomatic passport as well, which was the property of the EU
parliament and therefore could not be surrendered, the judge demanded its
surrender immediately on the basis that he was the judge in this court, not the
EU.
He said that Mote had piled “deceit upon deceit”, that he was “not
understanding the reality” and of “not understanding the position he was in”.
The judge had real concerns regarding Mote’s true financial position and
assets.
(After sureties had been given for bail, the case was adjourned for reports.
Sentencing was eventually set for the 4th September.)
4th September 2007
After pleas for mitigation from defence counsel, Judge Richard Price said the
following:
“Between 1996 and 2002 you made a series of claims for income support,
council tax and housing benefit. The prosecution say they were false and
dishonest and you failed to tell the authorities of your true financial position.
The prosecution case was you had, and you knew you had, substantial other
money which you dishonestly failed to disclose.
After detailing the 21 charges of false accounting, failing to notify a change in
circumstances, obtaining money by deception and evasion of liability, of which
he was convicted and the four of which he was acquitted, Judge Price said,
“The sums involved in what were a carefully planned series of deceptions
were significant. £31,000 income support, £29,000 housing benefit and
£4,000 council tax, sums in the region of £65,000 of tax payers money
dishonestly obtained by you. You chose to dispute the allegations, you
chose to plead not guilty. That is clearly a matter for you but it deprives you of
a discount for a guilty plea.
6
“You did not help yourself in your evidence to the jury. You gave every
impression of being a thoroughly dishonest man and as cross-examination
continued it became clear that there was a great deal that you had not
disclosed including the existence of two more bank accounts. You also went
to a great deal of trouble to cover up your tracks to make it difficult for the
authorities to find out anything about you.
You opened at least one company registered in the United States of America
and used post office box addresses in the Isle of Man and latterly close to
your home. During the relevant period you were claiming this money you
were in effect receiving substantial sums of money, tens of thousands of
pounds which you kept quiet about.”
The judge said that there were two sources of money, one from the cleaning
company whilst wife received money from their son’s company, which she
declared, but Mote could not do that as he was receiving benefits.
“What you did was to claim re-imbursement of expenses which you had not
incurred so boosting your income but doing it in a thoroughly dishonest way.
The second source of income was gaming on currency. Whether that was the
source of that money or wasn’t you knew perfectly well you had to declare it.
You knew it was money you had to declare.
To say this case has ruined you is an under-statement. It is a tragedy. You
have never been in trouble and always been an extremely hard working man
who built up a successful business, which collapsed through no fault of your
own. Witnesses spoke about your tireless efforts to get back on your feet
again at an age when most people consider retirement.”
“You were after the period covered by these charges elected as a member of
the European Parliament. You campaigned vigorously to help your
constituents say people who have written testimonials.
“Nevertheless the offences of which you have been convicted can only be
visited by custodial sentences, nothing else would be appropriate. Because of
the dates spanned there is no power to suspend the sentences, there is
nothing in this case which would justify exceptional circumstances. The
Court of Appeal has said that because of prison overcrowding prison will be
more difficult to serve. I take into account your age and everything said on
your behalf.
“The appropriate sentence is nine months imprisonment on each (count), to
run concurrently.”
Mote will be serving his sentence in Winchester Prison.
Reporting by David Samuel-Camps BA (Hons) Dip PA and Miss Tina Astley
Additional reporting
Lynda RoughleyA copy of this can be found if you CLICK HERE.

ADDED LATER:
A measure of the veracity of the reporting was that the claim was Ashley Mote was to serve his sentence in HMP Winchester – he was NOT so sentenced! HMP Winchester was the clearing prison for the region of the court!

Ashley Mote was assesed and rapidly moved to Ford Open Prison where he served between 3 and 4 months befor his release.

During the time Mote was serving his sentence his constituency staff were continuing to work and in regular contact with him on behalf of his constituents in acquittal of his duties as an MEP.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU

Nigel Farage & the mediocre squalor of UKIP (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
Marta ANDREASEN’s Unlawfull Election by: Lynnda Robson (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
Derek Clark UKIP MEP Disbands Committee to cover his lies! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
I Believe UKIP IS Anti Homosexual (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP’s Catastrophic Results are being spun by “Comical Alis” (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP MEP Gerard BATTEN, UKIP & Gregory LAUDER-FROST (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
The Current Plight of UKIP (ukip-vs-eukip.com)

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: Ashley Mote, Ashley MOTE MEP, Benefits, Council Tax, David Samuel-Camps, European Union, Member of the European Parliament, Twitter, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

EU Charter of misunderstanding Muslims

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 16/01/2007

EU Charter of misunderstanding Muslims

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Dr. Sahib Mustaqim Bleher discusses Sam Solomon & Gerard Batten UKIP MEP ‘EU Charter of misunderstanding Muslims’ with Ashley Mote MEP!!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

EU Charter of misunderstanding Muslims

Those who, like our prime minister, want to engineer a so-called “moderate” Islam probably look with admiration to Sam Solomon’s “A Proposed Charter of Muslim Understanding” published in December 2006 with a foreword by UK Independence Party MEP Gerard Batten (but without featuring an impressum or stating a publisher or printer as normally required by law for publications in the UK). An colleague of Mr Batten, Ashley Mote MEP, sent a copy to the Islamic Party of Britain for comment, informing that the document had been launched in the European Parliament. To save other politicians wanting to follow suite from embarrassment (the old saying applies that it is better to keep you mouth shut and give the semblance of intelligence than to open it and remove all doubt), I am reproducing my reply on behalf of the Islamic Party of Britain.

Dear Mr Mote,

may I first thank you for affording us the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Charter of Muslim Understanding you sent us; an open and frank discussion and exchange of ideas is the best way to achieve mutual understanding even if, in the end, we may only agree to differ.

Sam Solomon’s proposed charter of Muslim understanding is quite extraordinary both in its content and, maybe even more so, in its very existence. The European Parliament purports to represent the people of Europe (via their member states) irrespective of their religious or ideological beliefs. That the parliament should be asked to enter into a separate agreement with a sub-section of its own constituents appears unprecedented. Is there also going to be a charter of Catholic understanding, Protestant understanding, Jewish understanding, Humanist understanding, Atheist understanding, Hindu understanding, Sikh understanding, Scientologist understanding etc. etc.? Or is the very belief in Islam as a religion considered so outlandish to Europe that Muslim constituents are to be treated as a separate and outside entity apart from the rest of the citizens of Europe?

It is on the basis of this aberration that we could not support such a charter even if the content was agreeable. In his foreword to the charter Gerard Batten MEP is trying to differentiate between fundamentalist and moderate Muslims, a very common attempt amongst politicians today, although those terms are meaningless simplifications given the complexity of any religious or ideological belonging. There is no doubt that amongst the citizens of any nation there are people who might not agree with all or some of the principles upon which the respective nation is built. There will also be people with divided loyalties. However, this is not a Muslim phenomenon. The UK Independence Party to which Mr Batten belongs, for example, has members in the European Parliament whilst at the same time being in disagreement with the various treaties and the legal framework upon which the European Union is built. Such is the nature of democracy.

Of course, people like Mr Batten or Mr Solomon might want to differentiate between a mere disagreement of ideas and the so-called threat of violence and terrorism eminating from “fundamentalist” Islam. We reject indiscriminate violence and terrorism, but we cannot accept that they are a particular Muslim phenomenon. Rather they are the weapon of choice for the powerless objecting to political oppression and can therefore only be resolved by political means. Our government recognised this in the case of Irish terrorism which mainly abated once a political settlement of grievances was in sight. Our government’s involvement in the illegal invasion of Iraq or unashamed partisan support for Israel in her quest to dominate the region through aggression against her Palestinian or Lebanese neighbours, on the other hand, is fuelling international terrorism.

At no time in the history of “the Troubles”, however, has there been the suggestion that there ought to be a charter of Catholic understanding – since Irish Republicans confess Catholicism – or of Jewish understanding – since many Jewish citizens in the UK have dual nationality and loyalty and are even reservists in the Israeli Defence Force. Had such a charter, “allowing” – to paraphrase Batten – “Catholics/Jews from all strands of belief to make it plain that they reject those extremist interpretations of their religious texts that promote or excuse violence and bring Catholicism/Judaism into conflict with the modern world” been proposed, the Catholic Church or the Jewish Board of Deputies would rightly have rejected it as inappropriate.

Having hereby rejected the very notion of such an endeavour, I will still comment on some of the rather presumptious proposals contained in the charter document, for many secular politicians these days seem to arrogantly want to redefine religious beliefs for their own convenience. In his introduction Mr Solomon suggests that Muslim leaders should agree that anybody deviating from the path of his charter should be outcast from the religion of Islam as a non-Muslim heretic. Islam does not have a hierarchical church structure and does not afford anybody the right to give such an undertaking.

Mr Solomon would do well to at least study the religion of Islam before wanting to mandate the behaviour of its scholars. His demand for them to issue specific fatwahs is as presumptious as if he were to tell the Pope which edict to pass next. A fatwah or religious edict in Islam is not the mere expression of an opinion by an individual or a group, it is a well researched and referenced argument requiring the same level of scrutiny of source texts and precedents as a judgment passed in a court of law. In article 1 of his charter Mr Solomon demands the issuance of a fatwah prohibiting the use of force and violence against non-Muslim and in article 5 he demands that the notion and all teachings of violent physical Jihad be “regarded as invalid, inappropriate and irrelevant” and “hence inapplicable”. Article 51 of the UN Charter, on the other hand, states that “nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations”. What Mr Solomon is, therefore, effectively saying is that Muslims or Muslims nations should voluntarily surrender the rights afforded to them by the UN Charter. Whether Mr Batten or Mr Solomon like it or not, the Palestinian uprising is a legitimate expression of self-defence sanctioned under international law as long as Israel is in illegal occupation of Palestinian land. A similar case could be made with respect to many other conflicts in the world, yet here we are told that any Muslim supporting and defending such a right of self-defence should be excommunicated.

Moreover, Mr Solomon now also wants to play God by asking Muslim leaders to agree that “all Qur’anic Jihad verses encouraging physical violence, whether implicit or explicit, or any other quotations from the any Islamic source, be that Sunnah or the sayings of the Prophet or that of the learned scholars … are to be regarded as inapplicable, invalid and non- Islamic; All Qur’anic verses that COULD (my emphasis) be of inciting nature religiously, ethnically or discriminatory in regard to gender are just historical and will be regarded as non-effective for today’s world; These verses will be either deferred or suspended until such time as scholars find a solution for their interpretation.” Here is Chutzpah par excellence. The only missing ingredient is that Mr Solomon might want to be appointed to Chief Mufti of all European Muslims and put in charge of a new revised edition of the Qur’an acceptable to his taste.

After asking for a commitment in article 7 to fully cooperate in spying on their co-religionist by watching and monitoring mosque sermons and other mosque teaching programmes for messages not in accordance with this Charter, monitoring all publications, and reporting on any secret and suspicious gatherings of youths, Mr Solomon treats us in article 10 to three pages of Qur’an verses which he would want to have revised or rendered invalid, hastening to add that the list is not exclusive. Amongst those verses are even some which declare the belief in the trinity to be mistaken, which makes me think that the Spanish Inquisition was a lot more honest than Mr Solomon’s pretense at reaching an understanding; at least they spelled it out that conversion to Christianity was the only option available to Muslims in Europe.

Dear Mr. Mote, the above cursory points might not be the response you were hoping for. It is a sign of the immaturity of debate and irrationality of approach by those wishing that Islam as a serious proposition within Europe would simply go away that such half-baked proposals even have to be discussed. I am sure that anybody proposing a charter suggesting that the European parliament legislate on the interpretation of the Talmud or the New Testament would be made a laughing stock rather than be given a serious rebuff by the Christian Churches or the Rabbinical authorities. I have endured the ignorant assumptions and presumptious insults emerging from the pages of Mr Solomon’s charter and given them my attention only because I am all too painfully aware how little he and others like him know about the subject on which they speak. If there is to be more understanding between European citizens of different religious and ideological persuasions, maybe the first step should be to facilitate the education of European citizenry about what adherents to those religions or secular belief systems actually believe in. This would be a vastly more rewarding exercise than the current scare-mongering polemics against a sub-section of people within the countries of Europe, of which the document you asked us to comment on is a prime example.

Yours sincerely,
Dr Sahib M Bleher
general secretary
Islamic Party of Britain

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: Ashley Mote, EU, Gerard Batten, GL-W, Greg Lance-Watkins, Greg_L-W, Proposed Charter of Muslim Understanding, Sahib Mustaqim Bleher Dr, Sam Solomon, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, RESIGNATION LETTER

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 05/10/2006

Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, RESIGNATION LETTER
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, RESIGNATION LETTER!

05-Oct-2006! Be minded that Richard Suchorzewski was elected by the members of Ukip to the NEC & was Chairman of Ukip Wales and a Leadership Candidate.
Told by Nigel Farage he had no future in the party for having challenged for the leadership & sought straight answers to finance & other areas of corruption!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, RESIGNATION LETTER

Richard Suchorzewski Resignation Letter

Dear Colleague,

It is with great sadness and after much consideration that I have today sent by eMail and Royal Mail to The Chairman of UKIP the following letter:

5 October 2006

Dear Chairman,

Please be so good as to accept, and post on UKIP.org, this my letter of resignation from The UK Independence Party.

It was a privilege to be elected Chairman of UKIP Wales and work to represent the members in restructuring and introducing an organisational structure for growth. I would like to thank, for their invaluable assistance, John Bufton as Regional Organiser and my hard working and supportive committee and members in Wales. I am pleased to have been able to help turn UKIP Wales around and put in place foundations for growth and success in the National Assembly Elections next May.

I was honoured to be elected by the membership to represent them on the NEC, where they believed I had specialist skills and experience to best represent their interests, to the benefit of UKIP and its primary cause.

When I stood for the leadership election I did so, on a ticket of Transparency, Integrity and Equality. These standards reflect my inner beliefs, as well as the moral, ethical and Christian principles upon which I have based my whole life. I knew there were significant problems with the Party, and also believed that the moral integrity of a number of people at the top left much to be desired.

It was my belief that should I be elected leader these problems could be resolved and the Party then could move forward together, on a firmer footing in probity and strength.

Nothing however prepared me for the scurrilous behaviour, defamatory comments and downright dishonesty of some of Nigel Farage’s & David Bannerman’s staff, supporters and members of the Press Office staff, in which they clearly colluded.

I was accused of having associations with the BNP – even when these scoundrels knew that my grandfather was murdered by the Nazis in a concentration camp and my Great Grandfather was discovered hanged by them from a lamp post near his home by my 14 year old Father. Further I am angry that UKIP’s leadership were happy to collude in this base and obscene slur, particularly in the light of the fact that I have been ‘courting’ a young woman from St Lucia for the last 2 years, she herself has been victimised by racial abuse.

I was accused of being a homosexual, despite no evidence of this, and my having been happily married for 14 years, a marriage which sadly ended in an amicable divorce and now subsequently I am courting the above mentioned lady.

I was accused of having ‘run up’ a company debt of £4millions in one of my businesses when these accusers knew that I had purchased the company with secured debts, that it had already accrued, amounting to £4millions of losses. My business is in the field of mergers and acquisitions, specialising in the purchase, development and sale of problematic companies. My critics in this area are either commercial illiterates or unarguably dishonest either of which reflects ill on the competence of the new leadership.

My local newspaper was contacted by an UKIP official and advised to look into some of these accusations – in order to attempt to taint my unblemished reputation.

Even friends within my own local Conservative Party have informed me that they were asked for ‘any dirt’ they had on me including my political, personal and business affairs.

This list shamefully goes on.

Despite all of this I was willing to forgive and forget. I called for Party unity behind the new leader Nigel Farage, regardless of how he had gained his new position. I hoped this would in some way result in a change of attitude.

Clearly it did NOT. Farage colluded with, and thus endorsed the scurrilous behaviour. He was not prepared for his staff to apologise for the BNP allegations as he felt that the issue ‘would go away’ – and he tried to justify the concern on the basis that a fellow NEC member David Abbott volunteered his support of my leadership candidacy. (David Abbott is the very man whom Farage and his secretary Douglas Denny introduced and actively supported to the NEC and only turned against when he supported my candidacy.)

Farage also claimed concern in that a Mr Andrew Edwards supported my leadership bid on an internet blog that he runs. I am to be tainted by this, even though I have never posted on his site, spoken to, nor communicated with the said person, who I am advised is NOT a member of UKIP.

Farage has also claimed that a long term associate of his, Greg Lance-Watkins is a supporter and associate of the BNP, of which I have seen no evidence – yet this seems to besmirch my reputation, as G.L-W. openly supported my candidacy, having stated, based on extensive personal dealings with Nigel Farage that “he was a good performer for UKIP but lacked either the probity or competence to lead UKIP.”

This logic that UKIP’s new leader has adopted if seriously applied, must call into question his own credentials, bearing in mind both his long term association with G.L-W. and that the BNP actually refused to stand against Farage, and supported, his candidacy at the Bromley by-election. Does this make Nigel a BNP supporter?

Rather than be magnanimous in victory and help the Party unite, Nigel and his clique overturned a perfectly legitimate democratic vote at the NEC which had elected Geoffrey Kingscott (a most honourable man) as Party Secretary, denying the Party of another person with integrity at the top, and placing his supporter the discredited Douglas Denny in the post.

A witch hunt has now commenced, seemingly with the aim to disingenuously massage MEP lists, with the disciplinary hearing of Peter Baker for daring to make public his committee’s majority voted opposition to Roger Knapman’s morally questionable exploitation and involvement in a Polish Workers import business run by his son.

Similarly Dennis Brookes a loyal and devoted supporter and Regional Organiser of UKIP would seem to have been victimised, for having the temerity not to object to his committee’s support of my candidacy, and this apparently has contributed to losing him his job. I have no doubt from Nigel’s discussion with me, subsequent to the election, that others too will suffer similar fates.

On policy issues, Nigel has made statements already, that make it clear to me, we are to become a shadow alternative Tory Party. A pressure group created to persuade the Tories to dump Cameron and change its policy on the EU. I am sorry; I did not leave the real Tory party to join a poor imitation.

I believed UKIP was sincere in its endeavour to extricate Britain from the European Union, returning sovereignty to a British Parliament and playing a full independent part in that new Parliament.

On financial and transparency issues, I believe a cloud still overhangs the Ashford call centre and various aspects of UKIP accounts. Also the financial dealings and involvement in fraud, (as exposed by the media), of Tom Wise, one of UKIP’s MEP’s, have not adequately been resolved.

Likewise there has been a lack of transparency of others. I have contended that funding mechanisms are too heavily reliant on the EU, as this makes us subservient to the very body from which we wish to disassociate and which we openly accuse of corruption particularly in the area of accounting!.

I stood for leader knowing full well that it was a challenge I was unlikely to win. Farage had control of a number of advantages that if abused would guarantee him success. Knowing this, I was more than surprised that he allowed his cronies, supporters and certain staff to openly and reprehensibly lie and rubbish a loyal UKIP member, with elected duties, who devoted the last 2 years of his life, full time, unpaid, to help UKIP progress.

Even now in ‘victory’, Farage appears determined not to change his ways, and because of this I cannot support this Party under his leadership any longer.

Reluctantly I am left with no honourable action open to me other than leave, as I am not prepared to give my good name, reputation and integrity in support of Farage and many in his clique. I therefore stand alongside other Party devotees and former NEC members, Anthony Butcher, Gill Chant and others (not to mention the many activists who have already resigned).

My heart and my grateful thanks go out to all of those who supported me and the values in which we believed, and those who have committed so much of their lives in their patriotic pursuit of regaining democracy, British Independence and Sovereignty.

It does not give me any satisfaction to realise that the old saying “Fish Rots from the Head Down” may have more than a cursory resemblance to UKIP.

Please be so good as to convey to the membership my very best wishes and thanks for allowing me to serve them! At the moment I feel honour bound to continue the struggle for liberation from the EU and better Governance outside of UKIP, but would be happy to reconsider my position should there be notable changes within UKIP in the future under very different leadership.

Yours Sincerely,

Richard Suchorzewski UKIP Wales Chairman (resigned 5th Oct 2006) NEC Member (resigned 5th Oct 2006).

Be minded that Richard Suchorzewski was elected by the members of Ukip to the NEC & was Chairman of Ukip Wales and a Leadership Candidate.
Told by Nigel Farage he had no future in the party for having challenged for the leadership & sought straight answers to finance & other areas of corruption!

Suchorzewski was one in a long line who have been lied about and defamed by members of Nigel Farage’s claque to remove them from the party, unless one is a cult follower of Nigel Farage you will be forced out of Ukip if you dare to seek the truth or act honourably, which goes a very long way to explain why Ukip is so bereft of gravitas, competence, intellect or ability and quite clearly unfit for purpose when it comes to represent the electorate as they pander to the lowest common denominatior and elevate Nigel Farage to his cult status as a preening popinjay crowing from atop a dung heap seeking to ensure he is the dominant cockrel made to look like the pearly in a sea of ordure!.

Endless bandwagon jumping for votes for votes sake without principle, vision or integrity has doomed Ukip to a following not disimilar to the BNP with an overiding aim of self service supported by an ill informed and frequently ill educated elderly core of camp followers and the impressionable gathering of the naive and young always impressed by tyhose qwho take the easy road of insult and criticism but without vision or aim beyond their own enrichment and empowerment.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: EU, Greg Lance-Watkins, Richard Suchorzewski Resignation Letter, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

Ukip Treasurer Unable To Answer Financial Questions!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/03/2006

Ukip Treasurer Unable To Answer Financial Questions!
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Ukip Treasurer Andrew Smith Unable To Answer Financial Questions from Ukip elected NEC member Richard Suchorzewski & quits leaving the cults accounts in an unprofessional chaos as they seek a new Treasurer to suit the glorious leader!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

to view these documents just enlarge them, the facts show Ukip’s financial affairs in a total muddle and not only bereft of transparency but showing there is no willingness on the part of the leadership to have any transparency or honesty in accounting for money..

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU

Posted in Andrew SMITH, Richard SUCHORZEWSKI, UKIP | Tagged: Andrew Smith, Ashford Account, Claque, GL-W, Greg Lance-Watkins, Greg_L-W, NEC, Richard Suchorzewski, Ukip Accounts, Ukip Corrupt Accounts | Leave a Comment »

Liga HOWELLS, ICE, HUMILIATION, FARAGE & The NotW

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 29/01/2006

Liga HOWELLS, ICE, HUMILIATION, FARAGE & The NotW
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Liga HOWELLS, a whore who sold her body & reputation in a classic (if implausible) ‘kiss & tell story’ with claims of oral sex using ICE & practices of DISCIPLINE & HUMILIATION with Nigel Farage of UKIP featured in The NotW!!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Liga HOWELLS & The NotW

Anyone got a picture of Liga?

Liga HOWELLS, ICE, HUMILIATION, FARAGE & The NotW

‘MARRIED MEP Nigel Farage formed a European union with a half-German, half-Swedish blonde and begged her—yes, it was a WOMAN—to get MaaSTRICHT with him during sex’.

‘UK Independence Party MEP Farage is a fierce Eurosceptic. But he proved he can embrace Europeans if he wants to when he bedded Liga Howells—who was born in Latvia and speaks seven languages—hours after meeting her in a pub’.

To see more of this article CLICK HERE

subsequently removed, when Robert Maxwell closed The News of The World as planned, but sheltering behind the non story of telephone hacking!

So here is the text of the article on 29-Jan-2006:

MARRIED MEP Nigel Farage formed a European union with a half-German, half-Swedish blonde and begged her—yes, it was a WOMAN—to get MaaSTRICHT with him during sex.

UK Independence Party MEP Farage is a fierce Eurosceptic. But he proved he can embrace Europeans if he wants to when he bedded Liga Howells—who was born in Latvia and speaks seven languages—hours after meeting her in a pub.

The public school-educated toff stunned Liga with his kinky demands.

“I was quite shocked when he asked me to smack him during love-making,” revealed 25-year-old Liga. “He asked me if I would put him over my knee, but I refused, although I did give in and give him a few gentle taps while we were having sex.

“He also liked to call me Miss. It was ‘Yes Miss’ or ‘No Miss’ when we were in bed. I found this very odd.

“It was like he needed for me to dominate him, he enjoyed being controlled. I found it all a bit weird.”

Former Latvian TV news channel reporter Liga told how the UKIP Euro leader made sure she got NO KIP making love at least SEVEN times during their night of passion.

Farage only informed her he had a wife as they lay exhausted on her bed.

“It wasn’t after the first time we had sex that he told me, it was after quite a few times,” Liga said: “Afterwards he fell asleep and kept me awake because he was snoring like a horse.”

Ex-commodity broker Farage, 41, has joined the growing list of politicians exposed in sex scandals. The News of the World revealed how Lib Dem leadership hopeful Mark Oaten had an affair with a rent boy. Then his fellow candidate Simon Hughes admitted he was gay after TWICE denying it.

Liga, who is separated from her Brit husband, met Farage in the Black Horse pub near her home in Biggin Hill, Kent, on January 6.

Farage shares a house with wife Kirsten less than three miles from the pub. But Liga said the £59,000-a-year politician moved fast to get her INTO phpbb_bed.

She said: “We got quite close in the pub and we began kissing while we were in there. We agreed it would be ‘one night, and one night only’ between us.”

Liga and Farage, who helped found UKIP in 1993, then went back to her house.

They sat drinking wine and chatting until the early hours, when they went upstairs and stripped off to get in the bath together.

“We didn’t have sex in the bath but it was quite nice. He has a very good body for a man his age. He was quite well endowed too.”

After 20 minutes they dried off and headed for the bedroom, where Liga performed a sex act using ice cubes.

She said: “I put the ice cubes in my mouth. He really enjoyed what I was doing and was very noisy in letting me know.”

But Liga said she was left speechless when father-of-four Farage, revealed his kinky fantasy. “It was so weird,” she explained. “He asked me to smack him. He went, ‘Smack me, Miss’. I have never, ever heard anything like this in my whole life.

“He did ask me to humiliate him. It is beyond belief some of the things he asked me to do. And I wasn’t prepared to do what he asked me.

“We must have had sex about seven times. He had very good stamina.”

The pair exchanged numbers —but Farage’s wife found Liga’s on his mobile and called.

Liga said: “She was completely quiet on the other end. It freaked me out.”

In December Farage hit the headlines when he taunted Tony Blair as he made his final speech as EU President in Brussels.

And in 2004 Farage was exposed for quaffing £100 bottles of bubbly in seedy lap-dancing clubs in London and Strasbourg.

Last night he admitted he was in the ‘dog house’ with his wife for staying out all night at Liga’s.

He said: “I made a huge error of judgment going back with her.”

But he claimed: “I didn’t have a sexual relationship with her.

“That’s her fantasy.”.

I was surprised at the time that when it came to the crunch it was clear that Farage, for all his puff & bon homie, seemed not to have a friend or loyal supporter in the world, as absolutely no one neither colleagues nor staff, stepped forward to help him in his hour of need only Daniel Foggo and myself – as Daniel had tipped me off that Nigel was totally drunk in a pub, on the Friday afternoon, and likely to make a fool of himself and the party if he didn’t switch his mobile off!

I phoned Nigel and convinced him to turn his phone off to avoid the risk of demeaning the party by answering to someone who would make much of his drunken state so early on a working day – A style of behaviour not uncommon to him. You will remember that as long ago as when he was working for The French Bank he had been fired for his drunken excesses during working hours!

I was tipped off that there would be a story in The News of The World during Saturday and immediately set about damage limitation.

When the story broke I read it just after midnight but waited to see if it was in the paper version or just on the NotW web site and then phoned speaking with both Nigel, who was hugely hung over if not still drunk, and his wife Kirsten – they authorised me to publish the facts as I felt best but I did in fact write the article with the factual details that refuted the ‘story’ Liga Howells had concocted and sold to the media!

Clearly she had absolutely no evidence nor proof of the details she had concocted, but then again Farage had no way to prove his innocence!

Clearly Farage had no proven excuse however one need only consider the facts to realise the improbability of the story!

Obviously Farage’s insecurity and utterly irresponsible behaviour in consorting with prostitutes – be that in a bar or elsewhere, showed just how unsuited to leadership he was and just what a liability he was to any party of consequence!

On the plus side it was clear from my conversations on the Friday that the silly man was far too drunk to have made any intelligent choices and by the evening he was far too drunk to have performed in any manner as claimed by Liga Howells!

Kirsten did confirm that he had phoned her to come and collect him from the pub but she refused – partly in annoyance but far more consequentially as she could not leave the babies at home in bed and swan off to act as taxi to a drunk some distance from home!

The state in which Farage was on the Sunday confirmed that he would have been completely incapable sexually the night before and gave the lie to the whole story that Liga had concocted to sell!

A tip off and a little digging later indicated this was a part of the MO of this particular prostitute and that it was claimed she had sold just such a story on a prior occasion!

This in no way exonerates nor does it imply my respect for the protagonists – It is unarguable that Nigel Farage is a drunk who is not trustworthy, and thus completely unable to make intelligent decisions either as a parent or a politician, a husband or a party leader!

There is nothing macho or clever in holding forth in bars or bordellos and his childish behaviour in holding interviews with journalists in public houses has served UKIP catastrophically over the years – as he is so gullible that he is frequently strung along in a manner that totally undermines any concept of gravitas, professionalism or reliability UKIP may have ever aspired to!

Too often we see photographs of Farage quite clearly Brahms & List in public – the man may well be, to many, a likeable rogue but the downside is that in reality he is an insecure, immature fool the party clown perhaps even the performing monkey but it is clear he is not, nor will he ever be, a competent and trustworthy leader as he lacks the competence on all counts!

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: Claque, Consorting with Prostitutes, Daniel Foggo, Farage Drunkard, Kirsten Farage, Liga HOWELLS, News of The World, Nigel Farage, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

‘UKIP’s Ugly Secret’ DAILY MAIL!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/06/2004

‘UKIP’s Ugly Secret’ DAILY MAIL!
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

‘UKIP’s Ugly Secret’ DAILY MAIL by John Craven!
Exposing UKIP’s racist foundations and sad exploitation of so called celebrities!!!

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

DAILY MAIL (London)

June 9, 2004

UKIP’s UGLY SECRET

BYLINE: NICK CRAVEN

PERHAPS for the first time in her life, Joan Collins looked a tad uneasy in the limelight.
‘I am not a political person,’ said the usually outspoken actress when asked about the policies of the UK Independence Party, to which she was very publicly lending her support.

Ms Collins, 71, who once said ‘the secret of having a personal life is not answering too many questions about it’ was clearly adopting the same approach with her new political life – though she did admit to having never bothered to vote before.

After a few comments about ‘eroding ourselves to Brussels’, the ageing screen diva grandly swept out of the Nottingham photocall to promote her appearance at the city’s Theatre Royal. Maybe that was the real agenda all along.

Enter, stage left(ish), Robert Kilroy-Silk, erstwhile ex-Labour MP, former daytime TV star and the UKIP’s newest and most high-profile candidate in the European elections, who was only too happy to speak on Joan’s behalf.
‘Joan Collins has very clear political views. She is very proud of her country. There is no messing about with Joan Collins. She is in favour of being governed by her own people, and she wants Britain to come out of Europe,’ he said, without apparently drawing breath. Perhaps Joan is a little more political than she thought.

With or without her support, the European and local elections tomorrow will mark something of a watershed for the fledgling UKIP, whose votes will come mostly from disaffected Conservatives, rather than political virgins – even very wellpreserved ones such as Ms Collins.

THE latest polls show it forging ahead of the Lib Dems and nipping at the heels of the Conservatives in the European elections.

Kilroy-Silk, 62 – heading the UKIP’s East Midlands list under the proportional representation system – is on course to win a seat in Brussels.

He is also tipped as a new leader of the party which unites around two themes: getting Britain out of the EU and blocking virtually all immigration, even from EU countries.

Paradoxically, the party is campaigning to get as many MEPs as possible into Europe first to ‘report back’, it says, on the wasteful Eurocrats though, as we shall see, the UKIP’s existing MEPS clearly enjoy the Brussels champagne lifestyle.

It’s a simple message, and the UKIP has run an amusing slapstick party political broadcast where a figure in lederhosen (symbolising the EU Fisheries Commissioner from landlocked Austria) is assaulted with a huge cod.

It also has a Pounds 2million fighting fund, largely from wealthy donors such as retired Kent bookie Alan Bown and Yorkshire property millionaire Paul Sykes, a former Tory Eurosceptic, to boost its appeal and profile.

But just what is it that unites the mixed bag of supporters ranging from astronomer Patrick Moore to ex-England cricket captain Geoffrey Boycott, along with possibly millions of others, if the polls are correct?

Can a single-issue party really present any more than an opportunity for a protest vote which might backfire? Is it a Trojan horse for more extreme far-Right groups like the BNP, or a political lightweight relying on gimmickry rather than policies?

The UK Independence Party was formed in 1993 by a loose grouping of anti-EU politicians, most of whom were former Tories. Its early campaigning was largely drowned out by the larger and better-funded Referendum Party, founded by the late billionaire Sir James Goldsmith.

FOLLOWING Goldsmith’s death in 1997, many of his former supporters transferred their affections – and money – to the UKIP. The 1999 Euro elections brought the first taste of success at the polls when three MEPs were returned, but a period of brutal infighting followed, which appeared to weaken the party considerably.

But perceived Tory dithering over plans for an EU constitution has been an effective recruiting sergeant for the UKIP, and the financial backing of several businessmen who formerly bankrolled the Conservative Party has allowed it to get its message to a much wider audience.

Its creed is simple, and designed to capitalise on the powerlessness felt by Britons in the face of the encroaching European superstate: everything wrong with Britain is the fault of Brussels, and once we’re free of the shackles of the Rome, Maastricht and Nice treaties, Blighty will be as good as it used to be. At that point, with its job done, the UKIP says it will melt away and let others get on with ruling Britain. It accepts that its ambition of a Britain free from Europe is unlikely to be realised in the foreseeable future so, to help further its message, it is contesting seats in tomorrow’s local elections as well as the London Mayoral race.

So who are these little-known patriots giving the Tories a run for their money?

Many are high-profile defectors from Right and Left, such as Kilroy-Silk and the former Tory party member Sir Richard Body.

Five Tory peers have now joined Lord Pearson of Rannoch and signed up to the UKIP’s brand of nationalism.

But, as the Daily Mail has found, they are joining a party with a distinctly unsavoury hinterland.

Several key members of the UKIP have past associations with far-Right groups whose policies have either verged on racism, or clearly crossed the line.

New party members are required to renounce any affiliation with extremists, but perhaps the UKIP would do better to examine those already in its ranks, for the -questionable political baggage of some members could cause voters to pause before they put a cross next to UKIP on the ballot form.

Its leaders claim to be alive to the risk of infiltration from the extremist British National Party, and say such a plot was unmasked and dealt with earlier this year when six members were expelled, after alleged emails between certain members of the group and BNP sources were discovered.

There are, after all, two key similarities between the manifestos of the two parties: both are anti-European Union and anti-immigration. Neither has much of note to say about any other issue.

At one stage there was talk – admittedly, most of it from the much weaker BNP – of a merger, or at least a gentlemen’s agreement whereby the parties would not stand against each other. Nothing came of it, but doubts remain about just what really motivates the UKIP.

AND two of the most influential figures in the UKIP – national chairman Mike Nattrass and Jeffrey Titford, an MEP and former Party Leader – are past members of a fringe group called the New Britain Party. Another of the UKIP’s MEP candidates, Bryan Smalley, was on the national committee of New Britain.

Let us cast our eyes back to a 1977 by-election leaflet for the New Britain Party. It demanded that ‘coloured immigration to this country must stop completely and immediately’.

That year, its founder, former City businessman Dennis Delderfield, stood at a London by-election on such a racist ticket, and advocated a return to National Service and gave fulsome support to Ian Smith’s Rhodesia and the Apartheid-era South African government.

All three of the UKIP men freely admit their involvement with New Britain, but all claim to be unaware of Delderfield’s racist propaganda in the past.

Questioned recently about his candidature for New Britain in the 1994 Dudley by- election, Sutton Coldfield businessman Mr Nattrass began wearily: ‘Do we have to go into this?’ Of the New Britain Party, he said: ‘It isn’t what you’re thinking it might be. It’s not racist. It’s more interested in celebrating the Queen’s birthday and things like that. It still exists, and it’s a Eurosceptic party, but the UKIP is electable and New Britain isn’t.’

Jeffrey Titford, a onetime member of the Referendum Party, told the Mail his involvement with New Britain was ‘very fleeting’.

‘It was after Sir James Goldsmith had died in 1997 and I was looking for an anti-European Party,’ he said. ‘Mr Delderfield said if I wanted to come to a meeting, I had to join, so I did. It was a shambles and I didn’t stay long.’

Bryan Smalley, a retired Naval Commander from Hertfordshire, joined New Britain in 1994, and served on its national committee, because, he said: ‘It was the only party on the (anti-EU) scene.’ He added: ‘I found the organisation rather shambolic and I moved on. To call it extreme Rightwing is exaggerated.’ Even if they knew nothing of Mr Delderfield’s earlier campaign, questions remain: was it just political na’vety which prevented these UKIP luminaries from seeing Mr Delderfield for what he was?

More pertinently, was their decision to leave New Britain more to do with political expediency than a difference of ideology?

If the alleged comments of Nigel Farage, one of the UKIP’s three MEPs are anything to go by, he’d get on famously with a man like Mr Delderfield.

According to one of the UKIP’s founders, historian Alan Sked, who has now left the party, Mr Farage once told him: ‘We will never win the ****** vote.

The nig-nogs will never vote for us.’ ‘I was quite shocked,’ said Dr Sked, a lecturer at the London School of Economics. ‘Others just thought it was Nigel being funny, but to me it wasn’t funny at all.’ MARRIED City commodities broker Mr Farage, 40, from Kent, – who bears a striking resemblance to Rowan Atkinson’s Mr Bean – denies making the remarks, but declined to comment on other allegations concerning his nocturnal activities in London and Strasbourg nightspots.

Prospective voters may be interested to hear that he quaffed Pounds 100a-bottle champagne in seedy lap-dancing clubs, given his party’s pledge to root out and ‘report back’ on EU sleaze.

Former UKIP research director Richard North – also a refugee from the party – said of Mr Farage: ‘I am not, and was not prepared . . .

to pour him into a taxi when he was so blind drunk that he could no longer stand, or cover for him when he failed to turn up for morning appointments because he had been out on the tiles all night.’ That, he said, was why Mr Farage missed the crucial vote on the 2001 EU budget. None of this seemed to matter much to 100 or so erstwhile Tory voters I saw at a UKIP election meeting in Denham, Buckinghamshire recently, most of them clearly in rapture over Mr Farage’s tub-thumping oratory.

Certainly, you can’t help smiling when he rejects rivals’ claims that the UKIP is a single issue party by saying: ‘That is completely untrue.

‘We have a comprehensive manifesto ranging from Agriculture to Xenophobia.

If only theirs were as broad!’ One after another, members of the audience told me the same story that night. They were there because ‘We’ve been sold a pup with Europe, and no one’s telling us the truth apart from this party.’

Their resentment at the EU is understandable, but aren’t they in danger of buying a second pup if they send more MEPs like Mr Farage off to enjoy a five-yearlong European ‘party’ at their expense?

One thing is beyond doubt – if enough Conservatives – or even ingenues like Joan Collins – register their protests by voting UKIP, they will surely deliver a gift-wrapped victory to those whose European policies they fear most – Tony Blair and his Government.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: Claque, Dennis Delderfield, European Union, Geffrey Titford, Joan Collins, Mike Nattrass, NEW BRITAIN, Nigel Farage, Twitter, UKIP, UKIP Racism | Leave a Comment »

Happy 25th Birthday to me!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/01/1971

Happy 25th Birthday to me!
.

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide

OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

To Leave-The-EU

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Happy 25th Birthday to me! So that will be 26-Jan-1971!

Hi,

I inserted this as a caveat to show readers of this blog that although you can trust the facts I have provided you must be aware that many postings are made at a time other than that which is shown – particularly to add earlier material. To prevent misleading people you will note that I number my blogs (well not this one as it will make a muddle of the numbering).

[A practice I was forced to discontinue when we migrated to our own web .com site as several blogs were amalgamated to form a more comprehensive coverage of UKIP events and history]

Using numbers helps people to be assured of when material was added in the order in which it was added.

Thank you for reading this – you have about 2,000 more to read – if you really wish to understand how UKIP has been hijacked and has lost sight of morality, ethics or integrity and become a vehicle for the enrichment of a few without apparent principles or a moral compass – a change I choose to differentiate by use of the more apposite name EUkip.

I actually added this on 12-Feb-2010.
Updated 15-Jun-2012!

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE-THE-EU

to Reclaim YOUR Future

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337

of: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN
&
To Leave-The-EU

Nigel Farage & the mediocre squalor of UKIP (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
Derek Clark UKIP MEP Disbands Committee to cover his lies! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP Expecting Catastrophic Domestic Election Results (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
The Current Plight of UKIP (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
I Believe UKIP IS Anti Homosexual (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP MEP Gerard BATTEN, UKIP & Gregory LAUDER-FROST (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP’s EU Funded Hypocricy (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
Seems Gerard Batten NOT Found Guilty! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)
UKIP Catastrophically fulfills predicted results! (ukip-vs-eukip.com)

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: Anglosphere, Fraud, Gerard Batten, Nigel Farage, politics, Twitter, UKIP | Leave a Comment »

Next Entries »

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

For The Website Authors

The 20 most RECENT POSTS

POSTS & Comments SO FAR!

Archives

Categories

GOOGLE TRANSLATE

Follow me on Twitter

PAGES:

Just Say NO to EU

FleXit A WAY FORWARD

HoC – EU Exit Plan

EU_Referendum.com

JUNIUS On UKIP

REFERENDUM & How To Win!

Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Contact YOUR Political Servants

GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

Flying Spaghetti Monster

The EU In A Nutshell

The EUropean PARLIAMENT

The European Union

GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

The GREAT DECEPTION

The MANY NOT THE FEW

MINISTRY of DEFEAT

The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

SCARED to DEATH

Ten Years on

VIGILANCE

Voodoo Histories

WATERMELONS

Archive for the ‘UKIP’ Category

Share this:

Ex-councillor fails to return laptop and £200

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Related articles

Share this:

Crown v Ashley Mote

(16 July – 17 August 2007) A Summary

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Related articles

Share this:

EU Charter of misunderstanding Muslims

EU Charter of misunderstanding Muslims

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Share this:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Related articles

Share this:

Ukip Treasurer Andrew Smith Unable To Answer Financial Questions from Ukip elected NEC member Richard Suchorzewski & quits leaving the cults accounts in an unprofessional chaos as they seek a new Treasurer to suit the glorious leader!

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Share this:

“That’s her fantasy.”.

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

Related articles

Share this:

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

(16 July – 17 August 2007)
A Summary

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff: http://gl-w.blogspot.com