#0783* – Derek Clark found guilty but LIES to cover-up
Please Be Sure To .
. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
To Spread The Facts World Wide
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Hi,
Derek Clark OLAF Case Number:
D/007/033/04.09.08
Derek Clark OLAF Investigation Number:
DD/FD-D2008.A1/7133/OF/2008/0240
As published by this blogger and by Junius at the time of the original investigations and lied about by Derek Clark and others.
Many will recall the lies told by Clark, Farage, McGough, Denny, and many others in UKIP leadership about my blogs and that of Junius, yet NOT ONCE have they apologised when proven wrong, nor have they EVER made any moves to co0ntrol the cowardly band of sock puppets acting on their behalf and telling lies and misrepresenting Junius, myself and others trying to clean-up UKIP to make it fit for purpose.
NOT ONCE have they identified a single material inaccuracy in a solitary blog or posting of mine!
In a desperate attempt at a spoiler, to suppress the truth and distort the FACTS, UKIP has published clearly dishonest spin on their Huffington Post site.
Having lied repeatedly to members and also to The East Midlands Regional Committee Derek Clark with the full backing of Nigel Farage has tried to cover-up the fact that he was found guilty of fraudulent use of public money just as did Tom Wise!
IF the spin from UKIP had one shred of truth to it then why did Derek Clark keep telling lies?
As far back as 13-Jul-2009 DEREK CLARK LIED to The Derbyshire Times as written at the time CLICK HERE
Let us remember he has been questioned several times this week by a Journalist and firstly blustered, seeking to avoid confessing to his lies, dishonesty and fraud – eventually confronted by the undeniable facts in the FoI obtained by Daniel Foggo he admitted he had lied.
Derek Clark clearly showed that dishonesty is a UKIP Leadership policy when he refused to name who told him to lie claiming it was ‘A UKIP adviser’ – Would a man of integrity with any understanding of ethics be prepared to lie just because they were told to by their party leader?
At least when John Wittaker did he had the good grace to resign having told the lies for Farage to cover for the dishonesty and corruption of Annabelle Fuller!
Although the facts have been known for some time, just as was the fact that Graham Booth had also been found guilty and ordered to repay the money he had fraudulently obtained – we note in UKIP’s confession they forgot to admit this fact – no doubt unaware this was also included in FoI documents!
Clearly UKIP can not be trusted with public money and for the law makers to try to pass off their criminality with the claim they were unaware of the fact that they were acting fraudulently is not just implausible but is shown to be implausible or there would have been no need to lie.
For more about this grubby old man who has betrayed the electorate and lied to cover for having misappropriated public money for his own use to fund his own political staff – A process KNOWN to ber unacceptable yet Regional Organisers have until VERY recently been unlawfully funded from the public purse:
Derek Clark is unfit to represent others but we can expect Nigel Farage to try to protect him just as he repeatedly lied to try to protect Tom Wise – no doubt for the same reason in that both individuals were of considerable cash value to him personally! You will remember Nigel Farage tapped Tom Wise up for around £5,000 of the stolen money to settle a personal debt – money that was never paid back!
It is debatable which is the more damaging the utter dishonesty of the spin produced as an attempt to hide the facts OR the lies and dishonesty which was party policy to cover the truth OR the lies about me and my bl;og to pretend that the facts I provided about Derek Clark was a liar and thief stealing from the public was not true.
Who Derek Clark was stealing for is of no significance and as the offense was seemingly endemic in UKIP and condoned by Farage one is forced to ask if ANY of UKIP’s leadership and their sordid claque should be allowed to remain funded from the public purse.
It is appreciated that Farage seeks to retain control of his MEPs in office until he personally selects the new batch of MEP candidates for 2015 (see his new dictatorial powers imposed in the new constitution after the votes against the step to central control in the past and the repeated votes in EU style until he got the result he demanded! So Very EU!).
The only MEP likely to survive on the new lists is likely to be his puppet Paul Nuttall and several who have been promised positions are already known!
Obviously the ONLY way to clean-up UKIP is to go public with the details of the undeniable ineptitude, dishonesty and corruption – sadly there are far too few individuals of integrity within UKIP to make a hill of beans difference to the corrupt leadership.
Those in UKIP who KNOW all seem willing to support corruption by failing to have the ethical integrity to speak out to make the party fit for purpose – too many of them are considering their own personal ambitions and as with the temper tantrum of Nigel Farage yesterday, with his regional office, where he tried to blame everyone but himself for UKIP’s corruption & failure (The man who used Party resources to be beatyen into third place by an Independent dressed as a dolphin!). We note not one of those he berated has spoken out, though they have provided this blog with the facts!
Nigel Farage may well be a passable entertainer but he is without morality, a drunk who was tossed out of his job in the City, a sexual incontinent, an organisational cretin and without one wit of morality being ever willing to lie behind peoples backs to keep himself on the gravy train, just like Derek Clark and Tom Wise who he supported and his doxy Annabelle Fuller whom he protected despite her dishonesty and criminality, her foul language and demeaning blogs!!
Yes Farage is an assett to UKIP as a performer but as a leader he is a hopeless failure who has done a great deal to damage the EUroSceptic Movement whilst enriching himself and a few puppets by aiding The EU, having achieved the sum total of ZERO to thwart The EU in its malign control of these United Kingdoms.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Please Be Sure To
..
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
. .
Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
Greg_Lance-Watkins 
Dr Gasper is running for a seat on Oxford City Council
Helmer defected to UKIP from the Tories four days ago (Photo: Wikimedia/Berchemboy)
Ukip-vs-EUkip 
I never said that had broken into national politics and please direct me to where int he post I talk about corruption or the possible opaqueness of UKIP. I have merely tried to offer an impartial view. So far
Lord Hesketh
Lord Pearson
MEP Roger Helmer
Cllr Catherine Bursnall
Cllr Tom Bursnal
Lord Willoughby
and there is according to the UKIP many others in talk about defections.. While I can understand your view of my “speculation” the fact 3 lords one the ex treasurer of the conservative party, have defected to UKIP makes it seem less of speculation and more of a reality.
Also, you point to the 9 elected out of hte 700, I point to the fact I did not say they had broken through into the main political arena, if you had listened in you English lessons, one would have known that the ? symbol denotes a question.. I was asking whether this year could be the year they break into the mainstream, based on the fact that they polled higher than the Liberal democrats in many recent opinion polls.
While I may be “woefully misinformed” at least I am not an insular possible xenophobe who actually supports UKIP like yourself and your website on UKIP.
TO WHICH I REPLIED:
Hi,
you clearly didn’t read anything on my web site.
Do check out the 3 peers you quote:
Lord Heskith was on Newsnight a short while ago and has clearly lost most of the plot! He was querulous, uncertain, indestincy and just a name from history – bandiesd around as some sort of trophy but of no visible current political competence.
Lord Pearson – positioned by his father’s money and clearly of little ability was ‘used’ by Thatcher – his skill would seem to be limited to going out to lunch! A fund raiser who is past his sell by date to judge by his biungled delivery to UKIP. Untrustworthy and dishonest, two faced but clearly informed on sufficient of the details of The EU to show his contempt for membership of the malign social experiment.
MEP Roger Helmer – announced his retirement but then had a hissy fit when denied the privilege of anointing his successor – withdrew his retirement and in a strange act of vengeance it seems he announced he would join UKIP – he has made a huge and continuous income from the EU and unwisely was a close defender of the criminality of Tom Wise who was sent to prison for 2 years as was Nigel Farage who regularly lied to the public claiming top have dumped Wise – when it was more a case of having little wisdom rather than no Wise!
The Bursnalls are new comers of little consequence but that has not prevented them from being associated with some particularly crass statements including the suggestion that the vote be witghdraw3n from the unemployed!
Lord Willoughby de Broke – a long term EUroSceptic who greatest achievement in the field was his excellent web suite of EU idiocies etc. which sadly seems to have been closed. Seems alied with UKIP for no other reason than their claimed EUroScepticism whi8ch sadly seems to be more of a vehicle for the enrichment of its leadership than a reality of campaigning!
As to your attempt to smear me as xenophobic perhaps from the 1,000s of postings I have made on the internet it behooves you to find a single solitary example to justify your ill researched comment.
As to your use of ? as with the use of the word ‘Allegedly’ it holds no validity when postulating ill informed rhetorical questions in political debate being merely a febrile cover for ill informed opinion.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.