Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • January 2026
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Archive for the ‘UKIP’ Category

UKIP’s Reputation In The Gutter Over Racism AGAIN

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 07/12/2013

UKIP’s Reputation In The Gutter Over Racism AGAIN
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

UKIP’s Reputation In The Gutter Over Racism AGAIN! An Undeniable Charge In View Of Their Track Record!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,sadly it seems political retreads are all too often a liability – here again we see a turncoat from another party bringing UKIP further into disrepute!Again and again failures from other parties merely bring UKIP down – just consider David Bannerman, Marta Andreasen (qwho tried several other parties but could only eventually get into UKIP), Kilroy Silk, Neil Hamilton to name a few whose presence has befouled UKIP.

So I guess all we can say of Victoria Ayling is ‘here we go again’.

The association of UKIP, by leadership choice, with the gutter sweepings of EU politics in The EFD group and the rapid increase of members with the demise of the BNP makes it all but impossible for an honest and informed commentator to pretend UKIP is NOT a Racist Party.

‘Send them all back home’: In shocking video, UKIP councillor and key Farage ally launches astonishing racist rant… then tells MoS: ‘I stand by every word’

  • Victoria Ayling says all immigrants in Britain should be sent back home
  • Tells camera: ‘I just want to send the lot back, but I can’t say that’
  • UKIP leader Nigel Farage said her comments were ‘slightly odd’ 
  • Ayling said there is nothing ‘offensive or politically incorrect’ in video 

By Paul Cahalan

|

A high-profile UKIP politician is facing a racism storm after being caught on camera saying all immigrants to Britain should be sent back home.

Victoria Ayling, who made headlines when she defected from the Tories in March, made the inflammatory comments in a 20-minute video seen by The Mail on Sunday.

On the subject of immigration she talks about restricting the numbers of foreigners entering the UK, but then adds: ‘I just want to send the lot back, but I can’t say that.’

SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO

UKIP star: Victoria Ayling is facing a racism storm after being caught on camera saying all immigrants in Britain should be sent back home

UKIP star: Victoria Ayling is facing a racism storm after being caught on camera saying all immigrants in Britain should be sent back home

Defected: Ayling left the Tory party and joined UKIP in March and is a key ally of party leader Nigel Farage

Defected: Ayling left the Tory party and joined UKIP in March and is a key ally of party leader Nigel Farage

She then goes on to joke that her controversial remark could one day come back to haunt her. She said: ‘[It could be used for] some future get back at me. Bribery, blackmail – we need the blackmail music don’t we.’

Last night one MP said he was ‘disgusted’ by the comments that had ‘no place in front line politics’.

Mrs Ayling, 54, became a high-profile recruit to UKIP when she confronted David Cameron during this year’s Tory conference and told him she was leaving the party. She has been called a ‘trusted ally’ of UKIP leader Nigel Farage, so her comments will come as a blow to the party following a year of controversies. Earlier this year, MEP Godfrey Bloom provoked anger after referring to ‘Bongo Bongo Land’ in a speech about foreign aid. He later resigned from the party after he called some female activists ‘sluts’.

Mr Farage last night said that Mrs  Ayling’s comments were ‘slightly odd’. He added: ‘I have met her two or three times and I have discussed policy at length before accepting her into the party.

‘I had no reason to believe she held views that were extreme or inconsistent with ours. While this comment looks odd and unpleasant there may be a context here that is slightly different to the way it appears.’

 

Mail On Sunday Exclusive

Defiant: Video filmed by Mrs Ayling's ex-husband Rob in 2008 and last night she said she stood by her comments

Defiant: Video filmed by Mrs Ayling’s ex-husband Rob in 2008 and last night she said she stood by her comments

Controversial: The 20-minute video was shot to promote her political career

Controversial: The 20-minute video was shot to promote her political career

UKIP want to end ‘mass, uncontrolled immigration’ but does not call for repatriation of legal immigrants.

The video was shot in 2008 – but Mrs Ayling last night said she stood by the comments.

Mrs Ayling’s husband, Rob, from whom she has since divorced, helped shoot the footage to promote her political career. In one take, she said: ‘We must basically repatriate those that shouldn’t be here. That’s not quite policy yet. Maybe I should soften it a bit.’ She then added: ‘OK. Send them back.’

Rob is then heard to mutter: ‘National Front.’

In the very next take, Mrs Ayling – a Lincolnshire County councillor and deputy leader of the local UKIP party – says : ‘Multiculturalism is dead, I’m allowed to say that, but maybe Britishness is waving the National Front flag a bit.

‘We must control immigration. We cannot sustain the numbers coming in; the strains on our infrastructure are enormous. Control should be done fairly and the points system like they have in Australia and all those coming here should be encouraged to speak English so they can integrate.’

She adds: ‘I just want to send the lot back but I can’t say that.’

Last night, Mrs Ayling insisted her comments were taken ‘out of context’ and she was only referring to illegal immigrants.

'Multiculturalism is dead': Mrs Ayling references the National Front during the video

‘Multiculturalism is dead’: Mrs Ayling references the National Front during the video

'Complete opportunism': Mr Ayling said the video was in the public interest as she tries to become an MP or MEP

‘Complete opportunism’: Mr Ayling said the video was in the public interest as she tries to become an MP or MEP

She said: ‘It is nothing different from what the Home Secretary is advocating now any way. And the blackmail music is from a Monty Python sketch. I don’t think there is anything there that can be seen as offensive or politically incorrect.’

‘I stand by what I said: illegal immigrants should be sent back home and multiculturalism won’t work. It was a throwaway comment that has been taken out of context.’

Speaking about the footage, Mr Ayling said: ‘Victoria said during the divorce she would never be entering national politics again. Now, with her being a rising star of UKIP,  I think it is a public interest story in terms of the electorate knowing what kind of a woman she is.’

‘I remember remarking that [her comment] was a little bit National Front and she replied that we should send them back. I wasn’t shocked as she’s like that all the time.’

‘Victoria will do anything to further her political career. She felt she was passed over by the Tories, that’s why she defected. She has a better chance of being an MP or MEP with UKIP. It is complete opportunism, power at all costs.’ Mrs Ayling was within 714 votes of becoming Tory MP for Grimsby at the 2010 Election, and since joining UKIP has enjoyed a high profile.

'Trusted ally': UKIP insiders said Mrs Ayling was 'fast-tracked' for a council seat

‘Trusted ally’: UKIP insiders said Mrs Ayling was ‘fast-tracked’ for a council seat

One insider said she was a ‘trusted ally’ of Mr Farage: ‘She was fast-tracked for a council seat and then went on the BBC politics show.

‘She was a “Farage filly”. She was on stage at main conference and was even invited down to London for a photoshoot by Nigel.’

The footage was shot when Mrs Ayling was seeking selection as a Tory candidate for EU elections and features soundbites on several issues.

In between takes she is asked about defence: ‘Do we want the French to order our troops?’.

She replies: ‘Sod that. Just think of Waterloo, bastards.’ When immigration is discussed Mr Ayling is heard saying: ‘And your favourite subject, immigration…’

The couple divorced acrimoniously last year and Mrs Ayling now lives with Kevin Couling, who calls himself a ‘Lord’ after buying a title. The couple gave an interview to German newspaper Der Spiegel in June this year in which Mrs Ayling said Mr Cameron should ‘declare a state of emergency and close the borders’ to curb immigration.

Last night, local MP Stephen Phillips, said: ‘Immigration is a huge issue. But anyone who says they “just want to send the lot back” has no place at all in frontline politics.

‘People who have come here to work hard, to live by British values and to contribute to our communities have always been welcomed.  [Many] will be as disgusted as I am by the views which Mrs Ayling apparently holds.’

Iraqi-born Tory MP Nadhim Zahawi called on Miss Ayling to ‘retract her deeply damaging comments’, adding: ‘Hard-working immigrants contribute significantly to the UK.’ And Labour’s Diane Abbot said she was ‘shocked’

A UKIP spokesman last night said the party stood by the councillor and that the media ‘hampered debate on immigration’ by ‘failing to make the distinction between a frank discussion and unpalatable views’.

‘Given that this was before the time Victoria joined UKIP we cannot comment on why this video was made for the Conservatives.

‘However, we can vouch for her as a capable and decent councillor and support her through this time.’

Mr Farage said he did ‘recruit’ Mrs Ayling but was not involved in her selection as a local candidate.

Holding court: Nigel Farage shares a joke with Victoria Ayling (left) and other UKIP members

Holding court: Nigel Farage shares a joke with Victoria Ayling (left) and other UKIP members

Tory defector who ambushed Cameron

Victoria Ayling hit the headlines earlier this year after ambushing David Cameron to tell him that she was leaving  the Tories.

Shortly after the Prime Minister had finished his Conservative conference speech on March 16, Mrs Ayling cornered him to say she was defecting to UKIP because the Tories were ‘no longer the party of aspiration’.

She claimed Mr Cameron ‘lost his temper’ and then ‘twisted’ her hand in anger – a claim that has been categorically denied by Downing Street.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage hailed Mrs Ayling’s defection as ‘fantastic’ and described her as a ‘talented and experienced person who will work hard across Lincolnshire, the East Midlands and, indeed, the county’. 

She was then parachuted into Lincolnshire to fight for a county council seat.

The ex who shot the video… and left for a beauty queen

Wedding: Mrs Ayling's ex-husband Rob Ayling with his new wife Kristian

Wedding: Mrs Ayling’s ex-husband Rob Ayling with his new wife Kristian

Mrs Ayling was left feeling ‘emotionally betrayed’ after her ex husband left her for a former beauty queen.

The UKIP councillor and Rob Ayling split acrimoniously last year after he had an affair with Kristian Darling. She was a finalist in the Miss America competition in 1987, aged 17.  

A decree absolute was issued in August last year.

Criticising Mrs Ayling for asking for too much from the settlement, a judge said at the time: ‘The wife has been unrealistic in this litigation.

‘She has no doubt felt emotionally betrayed but she has taken this beyond the bounds of common sense.’ 

Mr Ayling married Miss Darling on Easter Day this year. The couple divide their time between the US and UK.

Mrs Ayling  lives with Lord Kevin Couling, who is believed to have bought his title, the 64th Lord of Little Neasden.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

Here is the letter Nigel Farage mailed out on the subject – he even signed it which is rare as he is disincined to leave a trail of his actions as many have found to their cost!

AYLING, Victoria 02 FARAGE LETTER re!
May I suggest that you read the Daily Mail article and view the video to make your own conclusions!

It is, as I’m sure you are aware, a very old and well tried concept to deal with exposure and any form of criticism to claim you are obviously a threat and that is why you are being exposed for your corruption, criminality or whatever.

The aim is to get the more gullible of your followers to gather around you in sympathy at just how unfair it is!!

Even Kenneth Williams caught on to this commedy routine and used it in a carry on movie:
@Infamy, infamy they’ve all got it infor me’.

Dr. Richard North’s article on this hugely over used and largely ineffectual type of attempt at leadership deals with it well:

 UKIP: Mr Holmes suffers constipation

 Tuesday 10 December 2013

000a Guardian-009 Farage.jpg

“Infamy, infamy, they’ve all got it in for me”, goes the famous line from Kenneth Williams in Carry On Cleo. And now, as Oscar Wilde would have it, life follows art: Nigel Farage is telling his troops: “the establishment and media are out to get us”.

Actually, this invites another saying, something along the lines of the great detective Mr Holmes afflicted by a bout of constipation. The idea that the media will do anything other than indulge in mischief belongs in the land of the fayries.

Nonetheless, Farage has warned UKIP activists to be “extra vigilant” about any attempts to paint them in a “nasty light” after a video emerged showing councillor Victoria Ayling saying, of immigrants, she would like to “send the lot back”.

Not for UKIP though is the point made in my last piece that the antidote to this “nastiness” is a properly crafted policy on immigration. With Mr Cameron so clearly out of his depth, UKIP are staring down the mouth of an open goal. Yet, as so often, instead of propelling the ball into the net, the party goes out to lunch.

There in the latest part of the Government’s “Balance of Competences study” – to which UKIP has made no contribution – has been a perfect opportunity to shine. Looking specifically at freedom of movement, it had been due to be released yesterday. But, according to reports, it has now been shelved until next year because Theresa May takes issues with its findings.

Specifically, so much of the evidence submitted has been “broadly positive about current rules for freedom of movement” that the Government’s rhetoric about cracking down on migrants has been left in tatters.

Filling the political vacuum by putting together ideas which will serve to manage the immigration problem would not only be a public service. It would alsoshow up the embarrassing inadequacies of our policy-makers and serve to establish UKIP as a responsible political party.

It is in the absence of that comprehensive, workable policy that UKIP is prey to accusations of bad faith. It really is as simple as that. But the style of The Great Leader always has been more rhetoric than substance, the “man-in-pub” of British politics.

However, he plumbs new depths of absurdity when he urges supporters to remember that it is “not always clear who we can trust”. There are, says Farage, “many opportunists trying to undermine the party”. And with that, we wonder whether one of them, perchance, is called Nigel Farage.

For the original of his article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Maj. Niall Warry rtd. Provides Some Hometruths About UKIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 07/12/2013

Maj. Niall Warry rtd. Provides Some Hometruths About UKIP
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Maj. Niall Warry rtd. Provides Some Hometruths About UKIP, based on a long term involvement in its management and leadership!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

here is something of a GUEST POST by an individual I am proud to call a friend retired Army Officer Major Niall Warry who has been a committed political activist and commentator since at least 1997 when he was working with Jimmy Goldsmith’s team seeking not just return of our sovereignty by leaving the EU but also an improvement in the democratic process in Britain.

When The Referendum Party collapsed with the death of Jimmy Goldsmith Niall joined UKIP where his hard work and political acumen soon found him elected as Chairman of UKIP Wales, a position he held until the sad death of his wife and his subsequent relocation to Cheltenham where he was soon elected Chairman of the local party branch, which he held until relocation with his partner Angela to first Yeovil and soon after to his property in Westcombe.Whilst in Cheltenham Niall was appointed manager of UKIP’s head office a position he held until he met with opposition to his desire to make UKIP finances more transparent and accountable, at which stage he soon made powerful enemies who presumably wished to hide the facts one must assume to cover the dishonesty of their tracks!

Sadly a style of cover up that we see again and again in UKIP where the ruling class, many of whom have been found guilty of fraudulently obtaining money from the public purse in 10s of £1,000s – one need only consider the lies told and the bullying of those who made efforts to bring financial probity to the party like Richard Suchorzewki, Dr. Eric Edmonds, John West, John Whittaker, Dr. David Abbott, Ian Gilman, Del Young, myself and others.

It may astonish some, and should horrify all, when one realises the incredible levels of ‘churn’ that exist within UKIP where a staggeringly small percentage who join the party renew their memberships, almost half of the elected MEP’s have fallen out with Nigel Farage and his utter incompetence as a leader or delegator as he surrounds himself with cronies and where over 70 NEC members have been forced out or decided not to continue as they do not wish to serve in Farage’s party and be associated with the corruption of UKIP and style of behaviour.

Niall had by this stage seen through the thin veneer of populism by UKIP and saw its inconsequentiality and lack of achievement as being due to endless squabbling like ferrets in a sack amongst its leadership clique as they fought for positions on the EU gravy train and even on arrival just how little they did to work towards the core value of Leave-The-EU as they stuffed their pockets, their bellies and eachother!

More recently Niall, in realisation  that it is not party politics that are at fault and that whoever is elected the structure of our governance ill serves our peoples.

Not just bemoaning the obvious Niall set out with others to try to make a difference and is working towards that with a long term vision as a director of ‘The Harrogate Agenda’ with others, including its other prime mover, who I am also proud to call a friend, Dr. Richard North.

The concept they have launched on what can well be called a slow burn to produce a sound and solid grass roots movement driven from the people upwards just as they believe our Government should be considerably more answerable to and directly responsive to the electorate on a daily basis with 6 specific People Led demands.

All of the main thinking, background and details are laid out in a very well thought out and presented pamphlet which can be obtained for £5 by anyone who wants to make a difference.

To get your copy mail £5.00 + £1.10 P&P to:
The Harrogate Agenda,
Higher Farm,
Westcombe,
Nr. Shepton Mallet,
Somerset,
BA4 6ER
Larger quantities can be supplied for reduced rates of postage eg: 6 copies would only incur a P&P cost of £1.90.
I understand quantities of more than 20 copies ordered at one time can enjoy a discount – Do call Niall if you wish to purchase quantities of this thought provoking pamphlet.
Niall has assured me copies will be mailed out to you with the income being used entirely for the cost of the pamphlet P&P and forward growth of the movement.On a different tack and obviously not as a spokesman for THA but thoughts in his private capacity based upon his experience of politics and of UKIP in particular, a well informed opinion as having a sound foundation of knowledge and experience of the party he has kept constantly in touch with developments since he eventually left to try to make a difference not least of all by his efforts to expose the errors, corruption, lies, fraud and failures of UKIP with an intent to clean up the party to make it fit for purpose.

WARRY, Niall 02 - 2656 Office + Map
#3847

Trusted Member Niall Warry's Avatar

Join Date
Feb 2006
Location
Somerset
Posts
9,648

Default

I’m not too close to anything I’m now just a critical outsider, who was an insider, who sees beyond the rhetoric and analyses with others the detrimental effect Nigel and his cult EUkip is having on the Eurosceptic cause.

What you have to assess is how Nigel (and let’s face it UKIP is Nigel) is helping the UK safely navigate itself to an amicable divorce from the EU?

consider these points:-

1.So he addresses issues like immigration and EU road signs etc and more often than not gets the information wrong which simply assists the ‘Establishment’ portray UKIP as little Englanders.

2. Nigel does NOTHING to address and counter FUD which again leaves the Europhiles with the advantage.

3.On the election front as he has no strategy, tactics or plan he as yet is nowhere near getting an MP elected.

4. In the European parliament he is affiliated with the ‘far right’ which is a ticking bomb waiting to explode.

5. His selection of MEPs is based on their sycophantic value and not hier abiltiy.

6. He has driven out far more able people than he has kept.

7. He is pushing for an early referendum which we would undoubtably lose.

8. He has no intellectual base or think tank to assist and feed the ‘media’ with Eurosceptic facts.

9. He does NOT generally support and nuture the grass roots.

10. Add to all the above his overall corruption of the party which is another ticking time bomb waiting to explode.

I’m sure I could have listed other areas where Nigel and his cult EUkip are not helping the Eurosceptic cause but the above are reasons alone to say with certainty:-

UKIP IS NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE.

Perhaps you, as a reader wishing to see UKIP made more fit for purpose, may wish to help by sending in additional points beyond the 10 Niall Warry has listed above..

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Mick McGough seemingly unable to avoid own goals!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 06/12/2013

Mick McGough seemingly unable to avoid own goals!! 

.

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! .

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name! .


Mick McGough seemingly unable to avoid own goals! A style of behaviour which he unpleasantly and dishonestly employs in a somewhat deranged and dishonourable manner all too often bringing UKIP into disrepute repeatedly!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

I was much amused to see Mick McGough making a fool of himself but unfortunately his endless dishonesty, corruption and efforts to defame reflect badly on UKIP as he has managed, largely through dishonesty and cheating to become a member of the NEC.

He made the following comment on the UKIP controled and dominated so called British Democracy Forum, set up by that dishonest scoundrel Anthony Butcher in an effort to gain cudos with UKIP and get himself elected, at which he proved to be a spectacular failure though his toadying did get himself onto the NEC briefly but although quite competent in written format his communication skills andf inability to think on his feet let him down and he lost his position quite rapidly.

The odious proven liar and cheat Mick McGough today made the silly comment:

#3808

Trusted Member     mick mcgough's Avatar

Join Date

Feb 2006

Posts

3,101

Default

What about the cult of liar GLW to whom you are in thrall Niall ? 

He really makes a fool of himself with his idiotic attacks – which he has never ever been able to justify or show provenance of, particularly in view of his proven track record of dishonesty and vile comments and behaviour many of which are, as you will have noticed, are shown on this blog and such documents as UKIP’s Returning Officer’s documented example of Mick McGough’s corruption, dishonesty and efforts to cheat his so called colleagues to get himself elected.

It is unfortunate for the EUroSceptic movement that they have so many unpleasant scoundrells like Mick McGough leaching off of the EUroSceptic cause – probably a very big part of why they have achieved so very little despite the vast amount of money they have squandered and stolen!

Endlessly attacking me for exposing the truth and for my campaigning to try to clean-up UKIP to try to make it fit for purpose clearly damages their claimed cause.

Not only is Mick McGough clearly a fool he is a dishonest & corrupt fool – sadly typifying others who have been raised to Farage’s NEC.

.

On this web site this article has led to the following comment which I felt was aposite to publish in text, so that it is not overlooked:

geoffbastin said

I have read your statement about Mike McGough but have failed to read what it is that he is supposed to have written or said that makes him look foolish. You seem to specialize in sweeping statements without any real comment. I’m intrigued to know about the many you criticise have actual been guilty of or said and done. But them I suppose you can’t say without facing serious penalties for defamation or slander. This whole site is one big slanging match with those who no doubt called your bluff. You don’t really have any grounds for complaint apart from a big shoulder chip because you failed to gain a position within the party. I’m not surprised at the expulsions that have occurred from time to time but I know they don’t all go away and start a blog with comments such as yours. Why not try being nice and polite for a change after all life is short and hell comes around sooner than you think.
Have a nice life.

To which I responded:


Hi,

thanks for taking the time to try to explain your opinion.

If you want more facts on the liar and cheat Mick McGough you need only use >SEARCH<

or view:

You claim not to have read what McGough & others have said, yet it was in this instance precisely quoted with the source given!

You also accuse me of ‘sweeping statements’ with little comment – Perrhaps you have not read the 1,000s of links I have provided and the factual data I have provided in support of my statements in the some 2.1/2 thousand postings on this web site alone!

Perhaps you can name one example where I have used ‘bluff’ that someone may have ‘called’ as you suggest!

You might also care to provide a single unsustainable claim I have made or consequential error in my postings or any kind of untrue or unsustainable (un sourced & cross referenced) comment I have made let alone ‘slander’.

The site is not, as you disparagingly claim, ‘one big slanging match’ – it is an effort to provide a clear archive of the corruption, dishonesty, incompetence, greed and criminality of UKIP leadership clique and its noisome claque provided in an effort to forece UKIP, which has clearly been corrupted, to clean-up its act to make it fit for purpose to lead in the field of EUroScepticism to Leave-The-EU.

You show your lack of factual knowledge & show yourself to be rather foolish with your comment:

‘You don’t really have any grounds for complaint apart from a big shoulder chip because you failed to gain a position within the party.’

I have listed item after item of clear, unequivocal grounds for ‘complaint’ with extensive examples and cross referencing. Perhaps you can identify what you call a ‘chip on the shoulder’ beyond contempt at the betrayal of the electorate and the exploitation of the EUroSceptic cause by some in UKIP and their thefts from the public purse and self indulgent behaviour, dishonesty and self enrichment that has so damaged the cause.

You are completely wrong with your claim I have acted because I ‘failed to gain a position within the party.’ Firstly I have never had personal ambition to gain a political position, I have never joined UKIP nor any other political party nor put myself forward for any political party or political income or position in any party – clearly your comment is just a small minded and apparent attempt to defame me based on not a single fact!

You said:
‘I’m not surprised at the expulsions that have occurred from time to time …’

Nor am I but I find most of such expulsions to be inappropriate and seemingly made in self interest by the leadership clique with little or no honourable or acceptable due process and such expulsions have all too frequently been based upon lies and dishonesty by those who seek to suppress the facts, transparency, probity and the truth. Many competent activists and supporters have been forced out of the party ensuring the party has never presented a stance or gravitas and well informed data, guidance and leadership for our Country and its peoples.

You also said:
‘… but I know they don’t all go away and start a blog with comments such as yours.’

Would thaty they had as perhaps UKIP might have been cleaned-up by now and regained the support of the many 1,000s of decent informed activists of stature and gravitas who have left the party in disgust – they might now have achieved something of value towards Britain leaving the EU and a number of MPs of consequence and ability.

You also admonish:
‘Why not try being nice and polite for a change …’

I believe that being ‘nice’ is a matter of telling the truth and exposing corruption, dishonesty and betrayal, perhaps you could identify where I have been impolite as a theme!

It would be nice to see more people being honest and exposing corruption and self interest that is to the detriment of these United Kingdoms and its peoples – I shall continue to acquit my duty and call on people like you to find out the facts before jumping to conclusions and to act honourably and follow my actions to clean up UKIP to make it fit for purpose.

You also cautioned:
‘… after all life is short and hell comes around sooner than you think.’

Life is indeed short and it is terrifying how the self interests of a small group of scoundrels can so easily cause damage to a worthy cause like EUroScepticism as have a clique of self serving neredowells who control UKIP have done with their odious claque, all too often defaming and telling lies from a position of anonymity or in abuse of authority.

Sadly I can not share your superstitious belief in retribution in hell as that would give me great pleasure in the realisation that the evil actions of a few in UKIP would face such justice for their greed, self interest and dishonesty – even perhaps for their corrupt ineptitude!

Thank you for your opinion and now that you may find yourself in command of rather morer facts it will be interesting to see if you have the ethical grounding to offer an apology for your wild leap to judgement and resultant defamatory statements.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&

Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to

Reclaim YOUR Future 

&

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

.

to Reclaim YOUR Future 

&

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel:  01594 – 528 337 

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<

Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
  

 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

Chris Pain Refutes Nigel Farage’s Racism Claims

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 02/12/2013

Chris Pain Refutes Nigel Farage’s Racism Claims
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Cllr. Chris Pain Refutes Nigel Farage’s Racism Claims made on behalf of his party!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

it has been clear for some time to those who are aware of what is going on in UKIP that the party is bereft of competent leadership and managed by bullying, back stabbing and bullsh*t.

It is sad to realise just how out of touch with common decency the leadership now is and how singularly incompetent they have become as they are too busy in fighting, like ferrets in a sack, to consider their duty to the electorate or the facts at grass roots level!

Clearly UKIP in its present state is unfit for purpose and utterly incapable of their patriotic duty in defence of these United Kingdoms in leading Britain to Leave-The-EU – as proven by their abject failure to achieve anything of value much beyond pranks and self serving schemes for self enrichment over 20 years!

Still UKIP has absolutely zero strategy and little understanding of tactics having failed to devise any concept of an exit and survival strategy with no clear plan for either exit or action thereafter.

UKIP is still peddling the outworn ‘isn’t the EU horrid’ mantras and failing to lay out the benefits and advantages of Britain Leaving-The-EU, having failed to realise the simple marketing fact that it is all but impossible and self defeating to try and sell a negative!

Yet again and again we see the UKIP clique placing proven inadequates with tired old failed ideas like Mark Croucher, Gawain Towler, Annabelle Fuller and their like merely for their ability to lie and reliable support of the inadequate leadership.

Chris Pain’s Letter:

My reply to Nigel Farage on ‘racism’ claim

In my right to reply concerning the accusations made against me by Nigel Farage following Question Time last week in Boston, please find attached my factual response to his allegations.This internal UKIP posting on the forum from Jonathan Arnott, general secretary of UKIP, reads: “the suspension isn’t anything to do with the ‘racism’ issue… The suspension is on two unrelated matters, both considered extremely serious by the party.” Unquote. Obviously Nigel Farage does not know why I have been expelled.

Firstly, the racist posts were proved never to be on my Facebook site. As you are aware this has been confirmed by the police.

Secondly, the two reasons I was suspended and ultimately expelled from the party was for forwarding an email to a UKIP MEP, who was entitled to the information, about the flawed MEP selection process.

The other reason was for recording a perfectly legal telephone conversation with the chief executive officer of UKIP which raised some serious issues about the MEP selection process and Steve Crowther’s (party chairman) integrity within the party.

I put an official complaint to the NEC on September 2 giving the information about Steve Crowther and I resigned from the NEC on September 3 stating I could not rubber stamp a flawed MEP selection process which did not represent the UKIP members. On Friday, September 6, Steve Crowther suspended me.

The five councillors have a written confirmation from the party secretary that they had done nothing wrong and were of good standing within the party. The action against these five raises further issues within UKIP.

Coun Chris Pain

To view the original letter CLICK HERE

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Documentary Proof of UKIP Corruption

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 02/12/2013

Documentary Proof of UKIP Corruption
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Documentary Proof of seemingly Criminal UKIP Corruption in perverting any meaningful democratic process in selection of candidates and officers!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.Hi,

earlier today, after a brief phonecall I was mailed the following copy of postings related to the corruption of UKIP and the apparent rigging the selection processes and internal elections in UKIP!

I have been unable to perform my usual checks on this material, however I do believe that it is an accurate report of that which it claims to expose and those shown to have been a part of the corruption, such as John Moran, Steve Crowther, Lisa Duffy, Peter Reeve and others have a track record where they have lied, cheated and corrupted UKIP.

I do believe the document I have been sent to be accurate and a sound report.

CROWTHER, Steve 02Steve CrowtherMORAN, John RU4OUT 01-08-12 02John Moran
at The Huntsman Hotel
at a meeting he lied about & denied attending

Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013
From: REDACTED
To:
Subject: Fwd: More on the MEP selection process – the maladministration of Steve Crowther

 

——– Original Message ——–

Subject:

 More on the MEP selection process – the maladministration of Steve Crowther

Date:

 Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:24:26 +0000

As ever more evidence appears regarding the maladministration taking place under the auspices of Steve Crowther, one has to wonder how he’s able to get away with it.  It can be taken as read that Crowther is a bully, but bullies are inherently cowardly.  Clearly, therefore, at least in my humble opinion, he is not acting in this way without the clear consent of A.N. Other(s).

Nothing shows this more clearly than in the debacle known as the UKIP MEP candidate selection process! Below you will find extracts from a statement made by a member of the NEC, as well as direct quotes from relevant NEC minutes.

A.
PS: The full statement is attached. In large part it deals with the removal of Mike Nattrass as a candidate, but what happened in the West Mids will be recognised in other regions!!!

 

NOTES REGARDING SUBMISSION OF STEVE CROWTHER

 
Mr. Crowther states an “independent panel”  was used.

The panel finally used (and it was not appointed by the NEC when actioned) has at least six people who, in my opinion and personal knowledge of people within UKIP,  I would NOT select for such a panel on the grounds of them having either potential self interest (as employees for example whose salary is dependent on the patronage of the Leadership), and/or,  of being potentially subject to undue influence from the Leadership by being close friends (like John Moran and Mr Crowther);  or very close to the Leader’s organisation for his European election campaign (such as Roger Bird).

I believe the pre-selection part of the process to be flawed,  and fatally so from a democratic point of view for UKIP members.

The pre-selection process over which you have presided which you freely admit was carried out without proper resolutions obtained is, in my opinion, seriously flawed.

I believe the results are so anomalous, and have caused such widespread dissent in the party with those affected,  as to indicate that one of two things has happened, or both:-

1) either that part of the process of selection has been seriously deficient in how it was developed and/or applied;
or
2) there has been maladministration in some form or another applied by one or more persons involved.

I  disassociate myself from it  as being the exact opposite of what was intended.

I believe it allows the possibility of, and certainly allows the accusation of, potential gerrymandering,  and I believe is fatally flawed as a democratic process by not conforming properly in its development to the Party Constitution and Rules, also by potential maladministration and/or misapplication of the rules by the party chairman Mr. Crowther.

——————————–

Ref Minutes of NEC 13th May discussion of MEP Selection.

NEC Minutes of 13th May clearly state certain people who are well known in the party, of good repute, and of good standing were to be used for that panel.

There was no dissent of these people in the NEC and an amendment to T.3.2  was proposed and carried.

Those people listed were:-

George Curtis (NEC member);
Sebastian Fairweather (NEC member);
Jeffrey Titford (Ex Party Leader);
Rachel Oxley (Ex-NEC member and head of an Independent school);
Roger Bird (Chairman of the SE selection committee and Nigel Farage’s organiser for the European elections);
Steve Crowther (chairman of the NEC);
Peter Reeve (Party Nominations Officer).

The selection panel actually used however,  was considerably different and was NOT approved by the NEC at that time,   and contained people who would in my opinion, most certainly have caused considerable debate in the NEC as to their suitability.

…… with near 100% certainty one in particular,  who was associated in one previous UKIP EU election in assisting the present Leader,  as manager and director of a Telephone Call Centre for donations, which had a bank account set-up for the Leader’s region without the knowledge of the then Party Treasurer.{Refers to John Moran}

On the 17th Aug Steve Crowther requested a vote by e-mail of all the NEC,  to make a resolution for the acceptance of a selection panel of three including himself, as he had not finished the process. This is after I had questioned the legality of the selection panels vis a vis UKIP constitution and rules,  and is a tacit admission that the selection panels were indeed deficient by not having NEC approval.

The Party Secretary {Jonathan Arnott?} first claimed he had carefully examined all the papers regarding the MEP selection process,  and said the whole of the selection process was legally sound in all respects {assuming this is Arnott speaking, his ability to make a ‘legal judgement’ is somewhat limited}.

He then later changed this opinion to an acceptance of what he called a “technicality” whereby the selection panel was deemed to be ultra vires because it had not been approved by the NEC.

On the 18th August,   Steve Crowther then called for a retrospective vote of the NEC by e-mail to regularise the deficiency.

He wanted a rapid resolution within 24 hours.

The Party Secretary claimed this was legally acceptable {see above},  and claimed it would have made no difference to the acceptance of these people if it had been put to the NEC properly earlier.

This is an incredible statement.
As a long-standing NEC member I dispute this vociferously.

The selection panel contains a significant proportion of people who were NOT on the original list put to the NEC on the 13th May and would certainly have caused considerable debate and some dissent in the NEC with some of the newly introduced people.

It was discussed briefly at NEC that party employees should not be a part of the selection process because they might be considered to have a interest in that their salary is dependent upon the patronage of the party leadership; but that was never resolved one way or another with a vote.

——————–

Further to Ref:  Paragraph 10

Para 13 states:-

“In this iteration of elections UKIP has worked especially hard to ensure that the process for selection of candidates has been as fair and transparent as possible”.

This is an incredible statement.

As an NEC member I do not feel this process has been transparent regarding the selection process at all.

In fact it is completely opaque to me as an NEC member representing the UKIP membership.

I cannot possibly say to the UKIP members “I know the process was undertaken with complete transparency and think it to be fair and equitable”.

I do not think that at all.

A sub-committee was formed but its required  functions were never satisfactorily carried out, nor its deliberations presented properly to the NEC for ratification.

This resolution for the formation of a sub-committee is contained in the following:

Document:
MEP Candidate Selection Process 2013  Revised 29.04.13
provided by Steve Crowther says:-
The sub-committee will establish a Selection Panel comprising five members selected for their experience, judgement and availability who will oversee and manage the process.

This sub-committee and its formation is mentioned in document to the NEC from Steve Crowther:
marked:

NEC 7 January 2013   MEP SELECTION

which says:-
An NEC sub-committee was set-up in October, comprising members of the NEC who are not intending to stand for MEP selection.

NEC sub-committee:-
Steve Crowther,
George Curtis,
Douglas Denny,
Toby Micklethwait,
Alan Bown,
Lisa Duffy (a),
Peter Reeve (a),
Michael Greaves (a)
(a=Advisory)

That sub-committee only sat for two sessions only  that I remember, (possibly three),  but no minutes were taken, though they should have been,  (which is why I cannot remember if two or three meetings occurred),  and not even the sub-committee’s outline decisions were given as written presentation to the NEC;  and no specific criteria for selection/assessment were ever discussed by that committee or the NEC.

As a committee it might as well have not existed.

Correct due process of the sub-committee, required by the NEC in a resolution (as above) was NOT carried out.
————————-

Another example of maladministration of the process used for MEP selection by Mr. Crowther, is that at the NEC discussion on the process, it was agreed that no member of UKIP of less than one year’s good standing would be eligible to stand as a candidate, ……

I am given to understand this NEC requirement in the selection rules of at least one year’s membership in good-standing for eligibility appears to have been ignored completely.
————————–

I have tried to ameliorate the problems by suggesting modifications to the process which could be easily implemented by resolution(s) of the NEC (obtained within the 24-hour format that Mr Crowther has already done in this case to retrospectively obtain correct due process),   and for an extraordinary meeting of the NEC to be called rapidly (within the week) when I first raised my concerns with the party chairman; but all these protestations have been turned down by the Party chairman and NEC chairman Mr. Crowther.

Note: The author of the above, Doug Denny, was removed from the NEC for submitting these statements to the Party. 

If you truly value democracy you must demand that Crowther is dismissed forthwith and that the whole selection process be revisited.

To do otherwise is akin to approving the aforesaid maladministration of Steve Crowther.

Make of this document what you will, but I for one find it to be further conclusive and irrefutable evidence of the corruption of any sort of acceptable democratic due process.That it is these same people who seek positions of Governance and the style of their corruption could well metastasise like a cancer to being a method of Governance in these United Kingdoms if they are allowed to continue their obscene self serving and self enriching behaviour shows them clearly to be unfit for purpose, unfit for public office and arguably to be criminally corrupt.

The following is a more comprehensive exposee of the abuse of authority and criminal style behaviour of UKIP leadership clique and its appointed claque:

NOTES REGARDING SUBMISSION OF STEVE CROWTHER

 

Ref Claim 3BM30448

Exhibit SJC1

 

Statement.

DENNY, Douglas 01

Douglas Denny.

NEC member.

 

Ref para 10. Mr. Crowther states an “independent panel” was used.

As the longest serving continuous elected member of the NEC I dispute this vociferously.

The panel could not be said to be “independent” in my opinon. There were people who could be said to have self-interest, or the Leader’s interests on the panel used.

 

The panel finally used (and it was not appointed by the NEC when actioned) has at least six people who, in my opinion and personal knowledge of people within UKIP, I would NOT select for such a panel on the grounds of them having

either potential self interest (as employees for example whose salary is dependent on the patronage of the Leadership),

 

and/or, of being potentially subject to undue influence from the Leadership by being close friends (like John Moran and Mr Crowther); or very close to the Leader’s organisation for his European election campaign (such as Roger Bird).

It is well known within the party, that the Leader Mr. Nigel Farage harbours grudges, and does not wish Mr. Nattrass to

be on the listing for MEP election because of the latter’s independent frame of mind and previous clashes of personality

with him over UKIP’s political directions.

Mr. Nattrass, however, is one of the longest serving members of UKIP with the greatest contribution to the party next to

the Leader Nigel Farage. His record of loyalty to the party is exemplary, he has spend a large amount of his time in his

life promoting and assisting the party; put literally many thousands of pounds of his own money into the party, and been

in most of the top positions serving the party eg: Deputy Party Leader; Party Chairman and Chairman of the NEC (the

position now held by Mr. Crowther).

That he has not been selected for the shortlist because, as Mr Crowther says: ” he simply came below the list of sixty

selected (because he is not good enough being implied)” is patently ridiculous in the extreme.

I wrote to Mr. Crowther:

I believe the pre-selection part of the process to be flawed, and fatally so from a democratic point of view for UKIP

members.

The pre-selection process over which you have presided which you freely admit was carried out without proper

resolutions obtained is, in my opinon, seriously flawed.

I believe the results are so anomalous, and have caused such widespread dissent in the party with those affected, as to

indicate that one of two things has happened, or both:-

1) either that part of the process of selection has been seriously deficient in how it was developed and/or applied; or

2) there has been maladministration in some form or another applied by one or more persons involved.

Had there been a selection of candidates by the previous process which was Regional selection by the membership;

almost certainly in my opinion, Mr. Nattrass would have come to the top of the listing for that region. To suggest he is

not good enough compared to some of those on the list accepted now is wrongful, highly anomalous and indicates there

is a severe breakdown somwhere in the process used. It is literally incredible.

This present process I helped to develop, but it has apparently become born as an abortion of that intended, which was to

allow the UKIP members a fair and clearly tranparent election of the best potential canidates to become UKIP MEPs. I

disassociate myself from it as being the exact opposite of what was intended.

I believe it allows the possibility of, and certainly allows the accusation of, potential gerrymandering, and I believe is

fatally flawed as a democratic process by not conforming properly in its development to the Party Constitution and

Rules, also by potential maladministration and/or misapplication of the rules by the party chairman Mr. Crowther.

——————————–

Ref Minutes of NEC 13th May discussion of MEP Selection.

NEC Minutes of 13th May clearly state certain people who are well know in the party, of good repute, and of good

standing were to be used for that panel.

There was no dissent of these people in the NEC and an amendment to T.3.2 was proposed and carried.

Those people listed were:-

George Curtis (NEC member);

Sebastian Fairweather (NEC member);

Jeffrey Titford (Ex Party Leader);

Rachel Oxley (Ex-NEC member and head of an Independent school);

Roger Bird (Chairman of the SE selection committee and Nigel Farage’s organiser for the European elections);

Steve Crowther (chairman of the NEC);

Peter Reeve (Party Nominations Officer).

The selection panel actually used however, was considerably different and was NOT approved by the NEC at that time,

and contained people who would in my opinon, most certainly have caused considerable debate in the NEC as to their

suitability.

Had those names been put to the NEC prior to the retrospective call for their appointment, and before they were used, I

would say some would most certainly have caused dissent, and with near 100% certainty one in particular, who was

associated in one previous UKIP EU election in assisting the present Leader, as manager and director of a Telephone

Call Centre for donations, which had a bank account set-up for the Leader’s region without the knowledge of the then

Party Treasurer.

On the 17th Aug Steve Crowther requested a vote by e-mail of all the NEC, to make a resolution for the acceptance of a

selection panel of three including himself, as he had not finished the process. This is after I had questioned the legality of

the selection panels vis a vis UKIP constituion and rules, and is a tacit admission that the selection panels were indeed

deficient by not having NEC approval.

The Party Secretary first claimed he had carefully examined all the papers regarding the MEP selection process, and

said the whole of the selection process was legally sound in all respects. He then later changed this opinon to an

acceptance of what he called a “technicality” whereby the selection panel was deemed to be ultra vires because it had not

been approved by the NEC.

On the 18th August, Steve Crowther then called for a retrospective vote of the NEC by e-mail to regularise the

deficiency. He wanted a rapid resolution within 24 hours. The Party Secretary claimed this was legally acceptable,

and claimed it would have made no difference to the acceptance of these people if it had been put to the NEC properly

earlier.

This is an incredible statement. As a long-standing NEC member I dispute this vociferously.

The selection panel contains a significant proportion of people who were NOT on the original list put to the NEC on the

13th May and would certainly have caused considerable debate and some dissent in the NEC with some of the newly

introduced people.

The ‘new’ listing of people was:-

Steve Crowther

Chairman of the Party and NEC. Designated chairman of the Selection Panel.

Peter Reeve

National Nominating Officer, and party employee.

George Curtis

NEC member of long standing,

Sebastian Fairweather

NEC member

Jeffrey Titford

Former MEP, former Party Leader, current Party President.

John Harvey

Former NEC member

Rachel Oxley

DID NOT PARTICIPATE. Former NEC member and Party Vice-Chairman.

Steph McWilliam

Chairman of Cornwall

Harry Aldridge

Former Chairman of Young Independence

John Moran

Long-term activist and donor. Founder director of the Ashford call centre.

Chris Cassidy

Treasurer of Young Independence.

Recently appointed National Database Manager at Lexdrum House. Party employee.

Derek Clark

Retiring MEP, long-term former NEC member.

Will Gilpin (stand in)

Party Chief Executive. Used once as a stand-in when John Moran was unable to attend a London meeting. Party

employee.

Roger Bird

Surrey County Chairman. SE Regional commmittee and likely organiser of Nigel Farage’s European election campaign.

Of these; Steve Crowther; Wil Gilpin; Chris Cassidy; Peter Reeve are party employees. It was discussed briefly at

NEC that party employees should not be a part of the selection process because they might be considered to have a

interest in that their salary is dependent upon the patronage of the party leadership; but that was never resolved one way

or another with a vote.

——————–

Further to Ref: Paragraph 10

Para 13 states:-

“In this iteration of elections UKIP has worked especially hard to ensire that the process for selection of candidates has

been as fair and transparent as possible”.

This is an incredible statement.

As an NEC member I do not feel this process has been transparent regarding the selection process at all. In fact it is

completely opaque to me as an NEC member representing the UKIP membership. I cannot possibly say to the UKIP

members “I know the process was undertaken with complete transparency and think it to be fair and equitable”. I do not

think that at all.

All that was achieved by NEC resolutions was an agreement for outline process stategy, such as the change from

Regional to a National ballot of members; of a selection process where all candidates would be ranked by a points

system; and to use an outside agency for “psychometric testing” as part of and only as an additional assistance to the

points system testing/assessment.

The most important and crucial part of the whole process however, i.e. the deciding of the actual criteria for

discrimination of the MEP candidates in the selection process was to be delegated to a sub-committee of which I was a

member; of non-interested persons i.e. not taking part in the MEP election.

In fact, to ensure ‘transparency’ and equitability, the NEC decided that all aspects of the MEP selection process was to

be decided by a delegated sub-committee specifically for the purpose, and this was decided by the NEC months before.

A sub-committee was formed but its required functions were never satisfactorily carried out, nor its deliberations

presented properly to the NEC for ratification.

This resolution for the formation of a sub-committee is contained in the following:

Document: MEP Candidate Selection Process 2013 Revised 29.04.13

provided by Steve Crowther says:-

The sub-committee will establish a Selection Panel comprising five members selected for their experience, judgement

and availability who will oversee and manage the process.

This sub-committee and its formation is mentioned in document to the NEC from Steve Crowther: marked:

NEC 7 January 2013 MEP SELECTION

which says:-

An NEC sub-committee was set-up in October, comprising members of the NEC who are not intending to stand for MEP

selection.

NEC sub-committee:-

Steve Crowther, George Curtis, Douglas Denny, Toby Micklethwait, Alan Bown, Lisa Duffy (a), Peter Reeve (a),

Michael Greaves (a)

(a=Advisory)

That sub-committee only sat for two sessions only that I remember, (possibly three), but no minutes were taken, though

they should have been, (which is why I cannot remember if two or three meetings occured), and not even the subcommittee’s

outline decisions were given as written presentation to the NEC; and no specific criteria for

selection/assessment were ever discussed by that committee or the NEC. As a committee it might as well have not

existed. Correct due process of the sub-committee, required by the NEC in a resolution (as above) was NOT carried out.

To this day I have no idea what criteria were decided upon for discrimination between candidates – that ended up entirely

under the jurisdiction of one person and of his devising – that is Steve Crowther chairman of the NEC. Mr. Crowther

never never put any of those crucial criteria forward for acceptance or discussion by the sub-committee (as should have

been done) – nor even to the the full NEC.

He took it upon himself to go ahead regardless.

————————-

Another example of maladministratoin of the process used for MEP selection by Mr. Crowther, is that at the NEC

discussion on teh process, it was agreed that no member of UKIP of less than one year’s good standing would be eligible

to stand as a candidate, but that an appeal panel would be formed to consider special cases on appeal if, for instance, a

high profile candidate appeared.

I am given to understand this NEC requirement in teh selection rules of at least one year’s membership in good-standing

for eligibility appears to have been ignored completely. There are some on the short list with less than one year’s

membership I am told, whereas Mr. Nattrass has been an active member from shortly after the inception of the party.

————————–

It is my honest belief that due process has not been carried out properly by the Party under the remit of the Party

Chairman to the detriment of a number of potential candidates including Mr. M. Nattrass. That Mr. Nattrass has a just

case for complaint; and that the process as applied was deficient in transparency and fairness to all.

I have tried to ameliorate the problems by suggesting modifications to the process which could be easily implemented by

resolution(s) of the NEC (obtained within the 24-hour format that Mr Crowther has already done in this case to

retrospectively obtain correct due process), and for an extraordinary meeting of the NEC to be called rapidly (within

the week) when I first raised my concerns with the party chairman; but all these protestations have been turned down by

the Party chairman and NEC chairman Mr. Crowther.

Douglas Denny.


.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

David GALE Alleges Criminality In UKIP Leadership

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 30/11/2013

David GALE Alleges Criminality In UKIP Leadership
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

UKIP prospective P.C.C. David GALE Alleges Criminality In UKIP Leadership and its practices! Comments & Report to Chief Constable East Midlands Police!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

I regret the delay in publishing this item, which I believe endorses many of the comments made by me on this blog over many years, it must be of interest to those following UKIP. The details were supplied to me a few days ago but I was unable to act as I was in The Royal Gwent Hospital Ward D3 whilst the medics controlled a consequential internal bleed related to damage caused by my various cancers and their treatment.May I thank the various people who have supplied details.

This following eMail arrived in my mailbox on Thursday as did others similar to it including interest from some of my media contacts:

Hi Greg
 
I keep and eye on yours and Junius‘ blog but I haven’t seen this covered yet. This went out on general release today.
 
Best regardsREDACTED

The attachment I hold as a .pdf of the letter as it was sent, in layout and letter head style hand topped and tailed.

David Gale with Nigel Farage

David Gale with Nigel Farage – official UKIP Publicity picture!

The text reads as follows:

David Gale
Interim Chief Executive
Kids for Cash UK
X XXXXX XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXXX
T: XXXXXXXXX
E: XXXXXXXXX

Kids for Cash UK – protecting vulnerable children by exposing paedophiles and
investigating criminal corruption in the family justice and social care systems

N Farage UKIP – Party Leader Newton Abbot Devon TQ12 9BG
28th November 2013

You will be aware that, for some time, I have been flagging up matters of concern about the management and political direction of UKIP. On many of the issues that I’ve raised, you have been copied in to my communications and in some cases emails have been marked for your personal attention.

Let me start by reiterating my areas of concern:

1. There is a lack of transparency over matters relating to the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC). Party rules are routinely flouted by the leadership. When held to account, party chairman Steve Crowther almost gleefully points at a revised party constitution that allows the NEC to retrospectively approve breaches of the rules by the leadership. There are numerous examples of this but the three at the forefront of my mind are: a) the expulsion of Robert Hamling b) the expulsion of Chris Pain c) the MEP selection process

In the matter of the MEP selection process, as a participant, I raised my concerns direct to Steve Crowther on the lack of transparency within the process. In fact, I refused to pay the £500 application fee, since it had become apparent that the fee represented a conspiracy by the party to defraud applicants who were never going to be allowed onto the candidate list. Evidence gathered since the selection process has confirmed my deepest fears that the process was rigged in such a way as to give you plausible deniability of personal involvement. It would have been easier to swallow had you stated openly those candidates whom you wished to be on the list.

Kids for Cash UK – protecting vulnerable children by exposing paedophiles and
investigating criminal corruption in the family justice and social care systems

In the cases listed above, there is clear evidence of significant rule breaches by the party’s leadership. In all of those cases, allegations of wrong-doing by the leadership have not been adequately pursued. Interestingly, my own local branch chairman has refused in writing to allow the subject to be discussed.

2. UKIP has shifted noticeably to the right. However attractive the proposition of having a handful of converted Tory MPs, allowing UKIP to become a refuge for the Tories in exile is alienating UKIP voters, particularly north of the Watford Gap. In my own region, the lurch to the right leaves Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, Lincolnshire and Rutland without any MEP candidate representation within UKIP’s candidate list. The situation in the East Midlands reflects the general trend across the country in that UKIP MEP candidates do not represent the politics of the vast majority of UKIP members and voters in the region.

Aligned to that shift to the right has been an evidenced intent to play to the populist gallery whilst concealing the real agenda. Increasingly, UKIP public appearances are becoming a sound bite driven public relations exercise, lacking in both substance and depth. At best, there is a mismatch between the leadership and much of the voting public. At worst, it’s a cynical manipulation of populist opinion to meet the agenda of yet another crony elite. Whilst I doubt that it was your intention to model your public persona on Lord Percy, UKIP is beginning to resemble an episode of Blackadder, with candidates presenting as an association of Elizabethan dandies. Throw in a pomander and a trailing kerchief and the picture will be complete.

3. It is becoming increasingly clear that there is a core faction associated with the party that is being used as a ‘Black Ops’ dirty tricks team against targets that include party members. I believe that your own deep insecurity and paranoia have played a significant part in the party’s Night of the Long Knives. Much of the recent press coverage of alleged hacked social media sites has been deliberately misleading. There is increasing evidence that points to UKIP members close to the party’s headquarters being involved in the creation of cloned Facebook pages which have featured damaging fake posts falsely attributed to UKIP members. Screen grabs of these posts have been fed to the press, third hand, in an attempt to smear the targeted individuals and as a precursor to removing them from the party. These are potentially criminal acts. The involved young party activists claim a close association with the party Chairman. Disturbingly, documentary evidence demonstrates that the Chief Executive Officer, Will Gilpin, was removed from post by the Chairman a matter of days after committing in writing to party members to investigate these allegations. The evidence that I and others have collated has now been passed to the police who tell me that a Special Branch investigation is underway.
4. For nearly two years, I have been raising the issue of the lack of scrutiny and governance within the party’s management. The common error is to look at a relatively small head office and staff and assume that the party is a small organisation. That is not the case. It is clear that UKIP’s professional officers are devoid of the skills and experience required to run a complex, networked national organisation, including the delivery of scrutiny and governance

Kids for Cash UK – protecting vulnerable children by exposing paedophiles and
investigating criminal corruption in the family justice and social care systems

over both operational and political policies and strategy.
One of the starkest examples of this lack of governance has been the tolerance of the party’s continued association with a convicted paedophile who, whilst no longer being a member, has continued to attend party functions and provide strategic UKIP documentation from his personal website. Party members with children, who have been asked for lifts to UKIP events by the paedophile, have been left unaware of the background of an individual who is on the sex offenders register for life. When warned about this individual, Chairman Steve Crowther has quite extraordinarily contrived means to remove the reporting individuals from the party. Through its lack of risk mitigating processes and actions, the party has knowingly exposed its members to undue risk.My own efforts to raise the alarm have been ignored by the leadership, it being left to me to contact branches to alert them to the potential risks to members and to have photographs of the paedophile campaigning for UKIP removed from branch websites. More recently, I have gathered evidence that I understand has previously been in Steve Crowther’s possession that demonstrates the paedophile grooming a vulnerable young UKIP member on Twitter, in violation of his probationary licence, yet Crowther has encouraged the individual to maintain his party activism. If this is UKIP’s response, how many more paedophiles remain within the membership?

On the first couple of points, I am mindful that my written offers to provide you with professional management skills have been ignored. The candidate list’s swing to the right is a betrayal of the membership and our voters. On the third item, conclusions around alleged criminality within the party must await the outcome of ongoing police investigations. On the fourth item, the issue of the party leadership’s response to the activities of a convicted paedophile within its midst is not something that I can overlook. My work as Interim Chief Executive for Kids for Cash UK leaves me no room for association with a party that cannot deliver the requisite level of organisational rigour and competence required to protect its brand and its members.

I am left with no alternative but to resign my membership of UKIP forthwith. I remain deeply respectful of the many genuine grass roots members who aspire to something better for our country but I feel that UKIP’s leadership is deceiving them. The focus is clearly on leveraging the goodwill of the membership and the British people in pursuit of a narrowly focussed personal agenda. I wish the membership all the best.

Yours sincerely

Signed by David Gale. 

Minded that:

David Gale was the UKIP candidate for Police Crime Commissioner in Derbyshire,

prior to his resignation  as explained herein I believe it would be reasonable to expect that he holds provenance of every detail he outlines in his letter; in the same manner as do I when publishing comments that may be libellous otherwise.I also asume that Mr. Gale will have acted responsibly and brought these matters to the attention of the Derbyshire constabulary.

However to be on the safe side and ensure there is no further risk for the juvenile allegedly being ‘groomed’, I have taken the liberty of drawing the attention of both the media and the Police to this blog for their further investigation.

I believe there are numerous claims in David Gale’s letter that would seem to be in the hands of a number of people that deserve thorough investigation by the police – as do many of the facts published on this blog over the last few years – that they have not been thoroughly investigated by the police and HMRC.

That it would seem that there has been no thorough investigation, it would seem, is a sad reflection of the state of our seemingly politically motivated, or at very least controlled, Police Service who it is alleged work for us as agents of HM The Queen and not as State enforcers for political interests covering and opposing those they may seem to best favour the interests of the Police!It would also seem that HMRC are all too willing to pursue ‘the little people’ but seemingly take little interest in politicians and their obscene indifference to not just the British economy which in recent years they have gambled away leaving the Country in debt to the region of 900% of GDP whilst surrendering, at great disadvantage to our peoples our Sovereignty and our advantage – now under the direct Governance of a foreign power with aims alien to the interests of Britain and bereft of meaningful democracy.

Again and again we see allegations, provenance and evidence of corruption in politics with obscene levels of bribery and false and fraudulent expenses.

We have Government Ministers caught up to their neck in fiddles and scams who do not even have the dignity to resign – they lie with melliflous efficacy and take a blaze attitude when exposed.

let us consider the occassion when the self confessed criminal Denis McShane exposed the fact that Nigel Farage had taken some £2Million plus in expenses he had not incurred!

We then foun d that Nigel Farage outright lied regarding his employ outside UKIP stating he was NOT involved in any other business when in fact the simplest of checks showed he was director of a consequential business with his brother.

We also know as a fact that he opened an off shore account and deposited the equivallent of over ten times the salary of a British citizen on one occasion alone gaining preferential taxation rates beyond the reach of HMRC and Britain’s tax system! Having outright lied to the media and others blatantly as a politician he lacked any sense of honour or integrity and has never apologised and clearly lacked the ethics to resign.

The most cursory read of the 1,000s of postings on this web site will show instance after instance that are surely criminal yet we see no sign of prosecution or even transparent investigation by OUR Police SERVANTS.

You need onl;y consider the undeniable fact that UKIP MEP Derek Clarke was found guilty of fraudulently, in breach of the rules, acquired somewhere between £30,000 & £100,000 and merely paid it back when caught. When EXACTLY is it acceptable for a thief, when caught robbing a bank, to be exhonourated merely by repaying the money stolen?

Further the informed will be well aware of the lies told by Derek Clark in his taxpayer funded job in denial of his having been caught and repaid the money. They will also be aware of the lies he and others amongst UKIP’s leadership clique and its claque have told about this blog, myself and those who post on The Junius Blog!

& of drawing your attention to The Junius Blog I am happy to confirm the facts in their recent GUEST POSTING at CLICK HEREObviously I could go on and on and provide many more instances of corruption in UKIP and dishonesty of its leadership but frankly just how often does one lead a horse to water to drink – just when will Her Majesty’s Government act with integrity and represent the interests and wishes of her peoples and STOP turning a blind eye to the criminality of those employed on the public purse?
When will the tax authorities and police transparently and clearly investigate the corruption and criminality that has so widely been alleged and claimed regarding UKIP?
To start as at today perhaps we can expect the clear and transparent investigation of the widely distributed allegations made by UKIP’s past PCC candidate as in his published letter above which I hope he has drawn to the attention of OUR Police SERVICE.PLEASE NOT – I have written to:
‘Chief Constable EMids re Derbyshire’ <Force.Control@Derbyshire.PNN.Police.UK>as follows:
#############################
From: Greg Lance-Watkins (Greg_L-W)
At: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
 
For the attention of:
The Chief Constable,
East Midlands Police Force.
Re.:
Details of a Criminal Allegation re.: UKIP & in relation to Derbyshire
 

Hi,

I have today received details of seeming criminal activity with regard to UKIP in Derbyshire, East Midlands and across the areas in which they are active.

I take the liberty of addressing you as The Chief Constable as I understand it to be your duty to appropriately respond and delegate the duties of investigation of such a matter. I would appreciate, in the interest of transparency with regard to the public purse and duty in public office, if you would be so good as to keep me informed, in as far as you legally can, of what actions you take to acquit your duties in this matter.

The details are readily available for you to exercise your good offices at:
https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/2013/11/30/here-is-a-template-01-10

I thank you in anticipation of your action in this matter, in the interest of the wellbeing of what currently passes for our democracy!

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W.


Addition below made C14:00hrs. Sunday 08-Dec-2013

This gave rise to the following rather strange communication from the police force:

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-GB
X-NONE
X-NONE

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”,”serif”;}

Greg,

I’m afraid I do not understand what your query is.

If I can assist you further, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards.
Peter Robertson, PC 2799

Contact Management Investigation Team

Derbyshire Police Headquarters

Telephone 101

It does rather call into question whether English is the first language of the officer in question as having reported a crime as alleged by David Gale, together with details that show criminal behaviour on the part of members of UKIP’s leadership, I found it strange that a British police officer allocated the job by his chief constable would find the facts difficult to understand.


However I phoned and spoke to PC Peter Robertson #2799 andf explained in simple terms that I was reporting allegations of criminal behaviour within a political party and I had provided details and facts to assist him in his investigation.

I was assured that of course the police were interested in crimes but they had not been able to work out why these allegations and facts pertained to their bit of the police!

I explained that David Gale had been a prospective Police Crime Commisioner on their patch (I also understand that he was also a policeman for a while but as Tom Wise proved for UKIP that is hardly a commendation!)

I also explained that I had addressed my correspondence to the senior officer as I felt he was best placed to delegate the enquiry to an area of competence within his force and assumed that which concerned other areas of the police would be passed on.

Polite as PC Robertson was I have grave misguivings as to his intellectual capacity to investigate anything beyond the most simple of issues and his failure to contact me in the subsequent week would seem to indicate I may not be wrong!

To give the benefit of the doubt, perhaps he has been in contact with David Gale and others, in the interim period and will come back to me later.

I await response from the police and will keep readers informed of progress.

Addition above made Sunday 08-Dec-2013

http://GregLanceWatkins.com

http://GregLanceWatkins.com/my-other-blogs-etc
http://GregLW.com
http://GL-W.com
http://GLWdocuments.wordpress.com
 
http://Leave-The-EU.org.uk
http://HollieGreigetc.wordpress.com
http://ChristopherStory.org 

http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

TWITTER: @Greg_LW
Skype: gregl-w
PLEASE NOTE:
I never post anonymously on the internet.
For details on accuracy please see:
https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/ensuring-accuracy-the-truth
#############################
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

David Gale’s resignation Letter & Critique

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 28/11/2013

David Gale’s resignation Letter & Critique
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

From a senior member of Ukip – David Gale, here is his resignation from Ukip Letter & his Critique

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
here is a discussion/clarification of David Gale’s Resignation from Ukip Letter, followed by the full text of the letter. David Gale will be remembered as a senior member of Ukip perceived as a rising part of the leadership clique, who stood as Ukip’s Police Commissioner Candidate:

Gale resigns from UKIP

David Gale and Nigel Farage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday 28th November 2013 – OPEN LETTER TO NIGEL FARAGE

In an open letter to UKIP leader Nigel Farage, David Gale, one of UKIP’s top performing Police & Crime Commissioner candidates, has today announced his resignation from the party.

In a damning indictment of its leadership, Gale accuses UKIP of betraying its supporters in its shift to the right. Gale said, “In many areas of the country, UKIP has been taking more votes from Labour than from the Conservatives, with the UKIP membership in the north focused on a common sense view of policy that is not shared by an ever-increasing number of  ex-Tory UKIP candidates. What we’re seeing is yet another crony elite riding a wave of public expectation for something different. It’s a deception and it’s a betrayal.”

Click to see David Gale's letter to Nigel Farage

Going on to list issues with the party’s MEP candidate selection process, as well as its failure to alert members to a middle-aged, convicted paedophile actively engaged with the party’s younger membership, Gale questions the leadership’s professional competence in its running of the party, “Whilst I doubt that it was your intention to model your public persona on Lord Percy, UKIP is beginning to resemble an episode of Blackadder, with candidates presenting as an association of Elizabethan dandies.”

Gale’s announcement comes after a sitting MEP and a number of Lincolnshire councillors were forced out of the party, all citing procedural irregularities by the

Click the image to see the document

leadership. Reports suggest that a large proportion of the UKIP Worcester branch in the West Midlands has resigned en masse, again citing the party’s leadership as being out of touch with its membership.

Gale said, ” I remain deeply respectful of the many genuine grass roots members who aspire to something better for our country but I feel that UKIP’s leadership is deceiving them. I wish the membership all the best.”

-ENDS-

 

 

The resignation letter in full:

N Farage
UKIP – Party Leader
Newton Abbot
Devon
TQ12 9BG
28th. November 2013
Dear Nigel,

 

You will be aware that, for some time, I have been flagging up matters of concern about the management and political direction of UKIP. On many of the issues that I’ve raised,
you have been copied in to my communications and in some cases emails have been marked for your personal attention. Let me start by reiterating my areas of concern:
1. There is a lack of transparency over matters relating to the party’s National Executive
Committee (NEC). Party rules are routinely flouted by the leadership. When held to account, party chairman Steve Crowther almost gleefully points at a revised party constitution that allows the NEC to retrospectively approve breaches of the rules by the leadership.
There are numerous examples of this but the three at the forefront of my mind are:
a) the expulsion of Robert Hamling
b) the expulsion of Chris Pain
c) the MEP selection process
In the matter of the MEP selection process, as a participant, I raised my concerns direct to Steve Crowther on the lack of transparency within the process. In fact, I refused to pay the £500 application fee, since it had become apparent that the fee represented a conspiracy by the partyto defraud applicants who were never going to be allowed on
to the candidate list.
Evidence gathered since the selection process has confirmed my deepest fears that the
process was rigged in such a way as to give you plausible deniability of personal involvement.
It would have been easier to swallow had you stated openly those candidates whom
you wished to be on the list.
In the cases listed above, there is clear evidence of significant rule breaches by the party’s leadership. In all of those cases, allegations of wrong-doing by the leadership have not been adequately pursued.
Interestingly, my own local branch chairman has refused in writing to allow the subject to be discussed.
2. UKIP has shifted noticeably to the right. However attractive the proposition of having a handful of converted Tory MPs, allowing UKIP to become a refuge for the Tories in exile is alienating UKIP voters, particularly north of the Watford Gap. In my own region, the lurch to the right leaves Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, Lincolnshire and Rutland without any MEP candidate representation within UKIP’s candidate list. The situation in the East Midlands reflects the general trend across the country in that UKIP MEP candidates do not represent the politics of the vast majority of UKIP members and voters in the region.
Aligned to that shift to the right has been an evidenced intent to play to the populist gallery whilst concealing the real agenda.
Increasingly, UKIP public appearances are becoming a sound bite driven public relations exercise, lacking in both substance and depth.
At best, there is a mismatch between the leadership and much of the voting public. At worst, it’s a cynical manipulation of populist opinion to meet the agenda of yet another
crony elite.
Whilst I doubt that it was your intention to model your public persona on Lord Percy, UKIP is beginning to resemble an episode of Blackadder, with candidates presenting as an
association of Elizabethan dandies.
Throw in a pomander and a trailing kerchief and the picture will be complete.
3. It is becoming increasingly clear that there is a core faction associated with the party that is being used as a ‘Black Ops’ dirty tricks team against targets that include party members.
I believe that your own deep insecurity and paranoia have played a significant part in the
party’s Night of the Long Knives.
Much of the recent press coverage of alleged hacked social  media sites has been deliberately misleading. There is increasing evidence that points to UKIP members close to the party’s headquarters being involved in the creation of cloned Facebook pages which have featured damaging fake posts falsely attributed to UKIP members. Screen grabs of these posts have been fed to the press, third hand, in an attempt to smear the targeted individuals and as a precursor to removing them from the party.
These are potentially criminal acts.
The involved young party activists claim a close association with the party Chairman.
Disturbingly, documentary evidence demonstrates that the Chief Executive Officer, Will Gilpin, was removed from post by the Chairman a matter of days after committing in writing to party members to investigate these allegations.
The evidence that I and others have collated has now been passed to the police who tell me that a Special Branch investigation is underway.
4. For nearly two years, I have been raising the issue of the lack of scrutiny and governance within the party’s management. The common error is to look at a relatively small head office and staff and assume that the party is a small organisation.
That is not the case.
It is clear that UKIP’s professional officers are devoid of the skills and experience required to run a complex, networked national organisation, including the delivery of
scrutiny and governance over both operational and political policies and strategy.
One of the starkest examples of this lack of governance has been the tolerance of the
party’s continued association with a convicted paedophile who, whilst no longer being a member, has continued to attend party functions and provide strategic UKIP documentation from his personal website.
Party members with children, who have been asked for lifts to UKIP events by the paedophile, have been left unaware of the background of an individual who is on the sex offenders register for life.
When warned about this individual, Chairman Steve Crowther has quite extraordinarily
contrived means to remove the reporting individuals from the party.
Through its lack of risk mitigating processes and actions, the party has knowingly exposed its members to undue risk.
My own efforts to raise the alarm have been ignored by the leadership, it being left to me to contact branches to alert them to the potential risks to members and to have photographs of the paedophile campaigning for UKIP removed from branch websites.
More recently, I have gathered evidence that I understand has previously been in Steve
Crowther’s possession that demonstrates the paedophile grooming a vulnerable young
UKIP member on Twitter, in violation of his probationary licence, yet Crowther has encouraged the individual to maintain his party activism.
If this is UKIP’s response, how many more paedophiles remain within the membership?
On the first couple of points, I am mindful that my written offers to provide you with professional management skills have been ignored. The candidate list’s swing to the right is a betrayal of the membership and our voters.
On the third item, conclusions around alleged criminality within the party must await the outcome of ongoing police investigations.
On the fourth item, the issue of the party leadership’s response to the activities of a convicted paedophile within its midst is not something that I can overlook. My work as Interim Chief Executive for Kids for Cash UK leaves me no room for association with a party that cannot deliver the requisite level of organisational rigour and competence required to protect its brand and its members.
I am left with no alternative but to resign my membership of UKIP forthwith. I remain
deeply respectful of the many genuine grass roots members who aspire to something better for our country but I feel that UKIP’s leadership is deceiving them. The focus is
clearly on leveraging the goodwill of the membership and the British people in pursuit of
a narrowly focussed personal agenda.
I wish the membership all the best.
Yours sincerely

 David Gale

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:

David Gale | Interim Chief Executive | Kids for Cash UK | w: http://www.KidsForCashUK.org

Kids for Cash UK – protecting vulnerable children by exposing paedophiles and investigating criminal corruption in the family justice and social care systems

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in David Gale, Nigel FARAGE, Steve Crowther, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Nikki Sinclaire, UKIP, the BBC & Police

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 23/11/2013

Nikki Sinclaire, UKIP, the BBC & Police
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Nikki Sinclaire’s biography, UKIP’s threats, the BBC interview & Police corruption of justice!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,one wonders who is alleged to have acted criminally in this instance – as Nikki Sinclaire has shown she has donated around £30,000 of her income each year, since she was elected as an MEP, just how plausible are the allegat6ions of fraud!

It seems completely implausible that someone might commit fraud when all they needed to do was not donate their own salary!

Then again let us consider the primary source of the so called fraud allegations would seem to have been John Ison who would seem to be completely discreditted, and also seems to have been acting in cahoots with the liar Mark Croucher who is known to be willing to cheat and lie when it comes to the Courts and British justice.
Ms Sinclaire remains on police bail following her arrest in February 2012 on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud the European Parliament.

The arrest was part of an inquiry following an allegation made in 2010 into allowances and expenses.

She told 5 live that she denied the allegations.

It is of course widely believed that justice delayed is justice denied!

I believe the ineptitude of West Midlands Police in this instance is far more disgraceful than even the most extreme of the implausible allegations of fraud which they may be trying to prove Nikki Sinclaire guilty of.

The behaviour of the Police in this instance is little more than a disgrace – it looks for all the world as if they are having difficulty fabricating a case!

Let us consider the wider aspects of Nikki Sinclaire’s life which she has finally felt able to divulge in her book, which I do, having read it, commend as an open, transparent, frank and very brave effort.The BBC has its own take on the issues as shown by Victoria Derbyshire who from her Twitter name @VicDerbyshire may well have a story of her own to tell – so come on Vic 😉

Nikki Sinclaire MEP: ‘UKIP made sex change revelation threats’

West Midlands MEP Nikki Sinclaire Nikki Sinclaire said she was warned by a doctor she would end up living as a drug addict and a prostitute

An MEP has told the BBC she revealed her gender reassignment secret because of threats from journalists and her former colleagues in UKIP.

Nikki Sinclaire, 45, an independent MEP for the West Midlands, left UKIP in 2010 after winning a sex discrimination case against the party.

She made the allegation in her first interview with the BBC since saying she had lived as a man until the age of 23.

UKIP said Ms Sinclaire’s claims were unfounded.

Ms Sinclaire, the UK’s first openly transsexual parliamentarian, told BBC Radio 5 live’s Victoria Derbyshire that she feared other people would expose the fact she had undergone gender reassignment surgery.

The MEP said: “One of the reasons I’ve had to reveal this was threats from journalists and UKIP.

“They threatened to expose this and this is why I felt the need. Because people asked: ‘Why are you saying this now?’

“Basically, I wanted to put my side of it before someone else put a distorted side out.”

Expenses probe UKIP leader Nigel Farage, who is in hospital recovering from a back operation, said he had not spoken to Ms Sinclaire for years and was “unaware of any threats to her”.

She said she had complained about UKIP members’ behaviour towards her at the European Parliament, which she said was conducting an investigation into the matter.

Ms Sinclaire remains on police bail following her arrest in February 2012 on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud the European Parliament.

The arrest was part of an inquiry following an allegation made in 2010 into allowances and expenses.

She told 5 live that she denied the allegations.

Speaking about the reaction to the revelation of her gender reassignment, Ms Sinclaire said none of her constituents at her surgery in Redditch this week had even mentioned it.

The MEP also spoke of the torment she experienced in the years before her surgery, revealing that a doctor had warned her that if she pursued her wish to no longer be a man she would “end up living in London as a drug addict and a prostitute”.

Speaking of her misery at the time, she said she would not wish this on “the worst person on the world”.

Ms Sinclaire also revealed that she suffered from deep vein thrombosis after the surgery, and almost died.

She said she was housebound for a year and suffered from “terrible” depression.

To view the original article CLICK HERE
Interestingly, showing just how implausible are many of the allegations against Nikki Sinclaire we are asked to believe that the BBC interviewed Nigel Farage in hospital where he is recovering from major spinal surgery! – Somewhat implausible as with his Twitter and FaceBook accounts!.It is interesting to note just howmany inadequates seem to resent Sinclaire’s success over adversity and seem to feel it is acceptable to try to attack and insult her for having achieved so much more than they ever have – people like Robin Tillbrook who has shown all too clearly why his nasty little racist EDP cult has made so little progress in politics, with his pathetic need to gratuitously insult people who have achieved more in life than he ever had or is likely to.

Tillbrook’s example, seems to be followed by the odious Robert Edwards and the many others who you will find displaying their sad and embittered inadequacies on the internet, abusing those who have achieved or those who have dared to question their odious style.

Typical playground bullies who have never matured!The shameful behaviour of the West Midlands Police seem not to be dissimilar in their efforts to invent evidence to move forward with their case and having failed – which they have when you consider how long they have strung out their efforts – they clearly lack the integrity to admit they were wrong and have strung their case out for 3 years, no evidence now will be plausible if to save face they construct a case!

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

UKIP Can Only Claim Not to be Racist with Lies

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/11/2013

UKIP Can Only Claim Not to be Racist with Lies
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Clearly, as the undeniable evidence shows, UKIP Can Only Claim Not to be Racist & anti Islamic with Lies!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
in a dishonest effort to deny the facts UKIP seeks to pretend it is not a racist party.

It fools no one to show a few examples of coloured members of various hue in an effort to mislead but consider the indisputable facts.

Gerard Batten has published anti Islamic pamphlets likely to incite racial hatred and potentially racial violence just to satiate his own bronze age superstitions it would seem!

Then we note that Nigel Farage has committed UKIP to supporting racist, anti Islamic, anti Jewish members of the gutter politics of the EU, with UKIP declared as members of his odious pan EU political EFD Group.

You may well have noted the vile outburst of the dishonest and corrupt UKIP Zionist member of the House of Lords Malcolm Lord Pearson as reported in a two page spread in The News of The World some time ago and here is another unpleasant comment from the nasty little man:

Ex-UKIP leader Lord Pearson warns of Islamist threat

Lord Pearson of Rannoch Lord Pearson led UKIP at the 2010 general election

UK Muslim communities are home to “thousands of potential home-grown terrorists”, former UK Independence Party leader Lord Pearson has warned.

Such people “hate us with frightening religious fervour”, he said during a parliamentary debate on Islam.

Sharia law was “running de facto in our land” and calls for violence were not simply coming from a “few extremists”.

But faith minister Baroness Warsi said Lord Pearson was either “ignorant” or attempting to “distort” views of Islam.

Lord Pearson, who led UKIP from 2009 to 2010, called a special Westminster debate on Islam.

‘Seething’ He mentioned the 7 July 2005 London bombings and the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby earlier this year, adding: “We see large and growing Muslim communities which are set against integration with the rest of us. We see thousands of home-grown potential terrorists.”

He went on: “We see Sharia law running de facto in our land and we see a birth rate which is several times ours.

“What baffles me completely is that when we do speak against these things, when we dare to say that they come from within Islam, we are told that we are the guilty ones, that it us who are stirring up hate.”

He said: “But the hate lies in the heart of the Islamist. We can only stir it up because it is already there, red hot and seething against us.

“These people hate us with frightening religious fervour and we are right to fear them.”

Lord Pearson quoted Tony Blair, who argued that “this strain (of Islam) is not the province of a few extremists”.

“Evil is at its most destructive when it passes from the individual to the collective,” added the UKIP peer.

Lord Pearson, who sat as a Conservative peer before joining UKIP, told the meeting in Parliament’s Moses Room: “I fear the dark side is moving strongly within Islam.”

‘Condemnation’ For the government, Lady Warsi responded: “I think it is a great shame at best that the noble gentleman has asked this question. It points at best to an ignorance about Islam and at worst a deliberate attempt to perpetuate a distorted image of the faith.”

Being a member of any religion involved “making choices” on how to act on one’s beliefs, the Conservative peer added.

On extremists, Lady Warsi added: “Islam, like all other major religions, is not inherently violent. Passages from sacred texts must be taken in context. It would be possible to distort quotes from any religious text.”

Talking about the killing of Drummer Rigby, she said: “If Islam justified terror, then we would never have seen the out and out condemnation of this brutal murder.”

“Most religions have suffered at most times from extremism. Islam is no exception,” Lady Warsi, who is the first female Muslim cabinet minister, said.

Al-Qaeda’s beliefs were “at odds with classical and contemporary” mainstream Islam, she added.

“Like all world religions, Islam neither supports nor advocates terrorism,” Lady Warsi told peers.

To view the original article CLICK HERE
Of course claims that UKIP are not racists or anti Islamic but as a party they clearly are, though many of its members may well not be.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

FOR THE RECORD – A STATEMENT OF FACTS

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/11/2013

FOR THE RECORD – A STATEMENT OF FACTS

Hi,

For the record – despite the obfuscation, dissembling and outright lies of those trying to hide the truth about UKIP as it is – It is of absolutely no consequence how many read this blog or this web site or my Twitter or my postings around the internet and elsewhere, just like UKIP membership numbers are of no consequence just as it is irrelevant how many watch a UKIP video in America, China or even France – it is a matter of the caliber of those who read the entries NOT numbers.
This web site and all its entries are posted as an archive and if ONE person of influence reads it whether media, politician or individual and it leads to cleaning up & professionalising UKIP & giving it some ethical gravitas and consequence thus making it fit for purpose as a party, which British citizens would be proud to join to Leave-The-EU, it has served its purpose.
This blog is an archive available to all and made as accurate as possible, clearly differentiating between my opinions and values and factual reportage of UKIP.
As is clear: Any error of fact is always corrected, if brought to my attention, and comments are always published – for as long as they are compliant with the terms clearly stated as follows:

We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse.

No comment has EVER been barred or deleted, which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual.

You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner.

We welcome genuine comments.

From my conversations with Team Junius I gather their aims were largely similar, as was their aim to inform and provide an archive of facts in support of UKIP becoming fit for purpose to lead to Leave-The-EU, which clearly it currently is not, as it tends to represent its own personal ambitions rather than British self determination, values and ethics.

At the moment Junius team have largely stopped addressing UKIP’s problems, in the belief that it is unlikely that UKIP will have any consequential influence on domestic politics after their failure in the local elections of 2013 when out of over 1,700 seats in which they stood candidates a mere 147 were elected and already they are falling by the wayside and or resigning due in part to lack of vetting, lack of professionalism and in some cases over racism, inappropriate behaviour and convictions for theft etc.

UKIP’s achievements are so clearly the product of a single individual that Junius has stood back from their role exposing UKIP’s ineptitude and dishonesty as unfit for purpose as to continue putting their own jobs at risk is no longer of sufficient consequence in the light of UKIP’s failure to obtain MPs, Police Crime Commissioners, Mayors or any other role of any gravitas or significance in domestic politics in 20 years.

Team Junius, I am told, possibly re-enter the position of political commentary if the situation alters and UKIP becomes of greater relevance in UK domestic policy rather than self serving also rans!

For more FACTS regarding the accuracy of this site and my postings elsewhere read CLICK HERE
For more FACTS & information about me, including contact data, IF it will help you understand the FACTS this web site and my many other postings cover CLICK HERE

I NEVER post in cowardly anonymity, nor obfuscate my identity as I believe it is an ethical matter of integrity to stand by ones comments. If unsure or deliberately misleading one should NOT demean oneself by dishonesty hiding one’s identity as a coward or a traitor would.

For the record I have NEVER had personal aspirations politically, nor have I ever stood for office; further I have NEVER joined or been a member or been funded by any political party, faction or similar organisation.

I trust these facts help clarify details for the ill informed and the outright liars who seek to defame me, my blogs, postings and web sites.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , | 3 Comments »