Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • March 2026
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Posts Tagged ‘Nigel Farage’

Chris Pain Banned by UKIP, as predicted long ago…

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 08/01/2014

Chris Pain Banned by UKIP, as predicted long ago…
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Chris Pain Banned by UKIP, as predicted long ago by this blogger when he first had a plan to expose the corruption of UKIP’s leadership having worked with Dick Horsnell!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

as this blogger clearly stated Chris Pain would be out manoeuvered by Nigel Farage when it became clear he was personally ambitious and wished to expose the corruption of the leadership of UKIP.

Chris Pain seems to have believed that he was smarter than all those good men and women who Farage and his clique had forced out of UKIP to avoid the risk of being exposed CLICK HERE

UKIP rebel Chris Pain’s bid to stay in the party turned down

By Grimsby Telegraph  |  Posted: January 07, 2014

UKIP bosses have confirmed ousted member Chris Pain has officially lost his appeal to stay in the party.

It comes after the county councillor fronted a UKIP Lincolnshire breakaway group along with other members.

Bob McAuley, John Beaver, Tiggs Keywood-Wainwright, Alan Jesson and Richard Fairman were removed by party bosses after they decided to join the group in September, as reported.

But national UKIP bosses have confirmed Mr Pain lost his appeal to have his membership reinstated.

The other ousted members can choose to stay in UKIP or leave the party to stay in the breakaway UKIP Lincolnshire group.

A UKIP spokesperson said: “Chris Pain’s appeal failed. He will never again be a member of UKIP. The others in the breakaway group have been told they can leave the group and come back to UKIP, or stay with Chris Pain.”

The breakaway group faced a meeting of UKIP’s national executive committee in London, on December 3.

The councillors were initially left “in limbo” after no immediate decision was made on their fate.

The party committee, made up of legal representatives and members of UKIP’s disciplinary board, decided to reject the appeal before Christmas. Mr Pain is still an elected member of Lincolnshire County Council.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Clearly UKIP Sees Itself As ‘A ONE MAN BAND’

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 07/01/2014

Clearly UKIP Sees Itself As ‘A ONE MAN BAND’
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Clearly UKIP Sees Itself As ‘A ONE MAN BAND’ & cancels the morning session of its business conference as without Nigel Farage it would be irelevant!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,nothing shows more clearly than the article below that Farage sees UKIP as a ‘One Man Band’ clearly he feels that not only would no one be likely to attend were he not there but after the ridiculous mess he made of last years party conference where he so lacked leadership skills that he could not cope with his drinking buddy & personally appointed MEP Godfrey Bloom’s antics he clearly does not dare risk the possibility of anyone stealing his lime light!Clearly with only two complete non entities largely unknown to the British public as his warm up act without him the entire event would fail, or so it seems.

UKIP leader cuts business summit in East Lancashire to a half-day

Lancashire Telegraph: UKIP leader cuts business summit in East Lancashire to a half-day UKIP leader cuts business summit in East Lancashire to a half-day

UKIP leader Nigel Farage has cut a planned day-long business conference in East Lancashire to a half-day.

Final preparations are now being made for the event, at the Mercure Dunkenhalgh Hotel, in Blackburn Road, Clayton-le-Moors, on January 24.

It is open to all from the business world interested in hearing about the party’s views.

Mr Farage will be available for questions after the session, with UKIP’s deputy leader and North West MEP Paul Nuttall, and Amjad Bashir, party spokesman on small and medium-sized business.

It had been initially planned that the event would span the day, but it is now to begin in the afternoon, with registration at 1.30pm.

Entry is by £10 ticket, and those wishing to attend should email ukipsouthribble@gmail.com A UKIP spokeswoman said: “Nigel has such a whirlwind life he could only make it in the afternoon.

“He just never stops and his feet rarely touch the ground with all the demands on his time.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Or to follow the lighter hearted lead of Petrina Holdsworth, formerly Chairman of UKIP, who posted on a largely UKIP controlled public Forum:

Default Farage`s One Man Show

Roll up !Roll up ! The amazing Nigel Farage will amuse and enchant you with his wild stories of terrifying and amusing encounters of the political kind with such well known personages as Tony Blair ,Robert Kilroy-Silk.Barroso and others .He will then sign copies of his book in front of your very eyes.
Do not miss this exciting moment,the never to be repeated (or is it just the start) “one man show.”

Go on folks – 10th Feb tickets £21 at the Assembly Hall Theatre T.Wells Kent.
All profits to the Nigel Farage Benevolent Fund no doubt.

To meet with a rapid riposte from Eric Edmund a for5mer elected member of UKIP NEC who was dishonestly forced off of the NEC by Nigel Farage and cronies he controls based on a pack of lies who said, possibly more in hope than expectation:

‘If you sit on the benches of the Bailey long enough you may see whole Cabal in the dock. The legal process grinds exceeding slow but exceeding fine. ‘
Followed up shortly after by a comment from Niall Warry who was UKIP Chairman of Wales later serving as Branch Chairman of Cheltenham’s UKIP Branch during which time he also served as UKIP’s Head Office manager – his comments are similarly condemnatory:

Default

That UKIP is a one man show is beyond doubt.

Nigel keeps coming up with catchy populist rhetoric on immigration and much else but on detail and how to actually extract us for the EU there is sadly deafening silence.

Yes he will do well in the euro elections but even if he was to achieve all 70 odd MEPs what on earthly good would that do to getting us out of the EU? It would of course make his sycophants all wealthy beyond their abilities but then that is all that really matters to Nigel.

What existing UKIP MEP has actually achieved anything of consequence?

Nikki, an ex -UKIP MEP, works hard but on a project, for an early referendum, which would be a disaster for our causeas we would lose.

Nigel runs his cult EUkip for his own self and financial advancement and to deny this is to be blind to the bleeding obvious.

The extraordinary part of this story is that UKIP has managed to dupe so many gullible people that they stand every possibility of being THE party to act as the dustbin into which the majority of protest votes will go during the EU elections this coming May – However it is unlikely they will be able to follow that with any similar result in the elections of 2015 for Westminster and Local Government.Mided of just how untrustworthy and useless the politicians of  the two other parties are sadly we can not count on the low grade scoundrels in UKIP not having a major impact in 2015 – but clearly they are unfit for purpose in their present state and structure lurching from idiocy to idiocy without any signs of consistent competence or acceptable gravitas for the task of leading Britain to Leave-The-EU.
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

> A GUEST POST: On Farage’s Party’s Betrayal of British Voters

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 27/12/2013

> A GUEST POST: On Farage’s Party’s Betrayal of British VotersTITLE
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

FARAGE, Nigel 80How could the Homosexual sorority & fraternity fault such makeup.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

On Farage’s Party’s Betrayal of British Voters

A GUEST POST

.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on TwitterRe-TWEET my Twitterings 

& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide

of

&

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 

their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

On Nigel Farage’s EU Party’s Betrayal of British Voters in general and the few remaining UKIP supporters gullible enough to be acting ethically, if misguidedly!

The article below, exposing Farage and his clique, is as received from a long term source within the staff of The EU who has worked for many years for the UKIP cause, as members see it rather than as its self serving EU staff & the leadership clique and their claque see it!

..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~

THE TRUTH ABOUT FARAGE’S EFD GROUP – AN ORGANISATION HUGELY SUBVERSIVE TO UK INTERESTS THAT WANTS UKRAINE IN THE EU


BELOW ARE AMENDMENTS FROM THE EFD GROUP – IE FARAGE’S GROUP – ON “THE OUTCOME OF THE VILNIUS SUMMIT AND THE FUTURE OF THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP IN PARTICULAR AS REGARDS UKRAINE”.

GROSS HYPOCRISY AND TREACHERY.


Do Ukip members know that Farage’s allies in the EFD Group (of which Ukip is the largest constituent part) want to include the Ukraine, a country of 45m inhabitants, into the EU?

Do Farage’s constituents know this and did they vote for Farage and Ukip to achieve this ambition?

Do Ukip members and supporters know what Farage and his fellow MEPs are doing in Brussels and Strasbourg?

BACKGROUND

On 11.12.13, in a debate in the European Parliament, Farage distinguished between immigrants from poor countries and those from rich nations.  He implied we should refuse migrants from poor countries because they would have access to our benefits and services and he therefore rejected free entry into the UK of Romanian and Bulgarian immigrants. 

According to the IMF, Romania in 2012 had a GDP per capita income of USD 12,722;  Bulgaria USD 14,103.  The Ukraine had a GDP per capita income of USD 7,295.  The UK had a per capita income of USD 36569.

This means the UK had a per capita income five times that of the Ukraine but only two and a half times that of Romania and Bulgaria. 

GROSS HYPOCRISY

Farage, the same day, also attacked Tory MEP Van Orden as being the Rapporteur for the entry of Bulgaria into the EU some years ago.  Meanwhile, members of Farage’s own EFD Group are supporting the entry of the Ukraine into the EU – with all the implications this has for the UK taxpayer!  The population of Ukraine is 45m, almost twice as large as that of Bulgaria and Romania combined.

The EFD Group is subversive to the interests of the EU.  Members of this group have sought to expand the EU to include the Ukraine.

When will Farage expel the MEPs Tadeusz Cymański, Zbigniew Ziobro from the EFD and others who supported them?

Do Farage’s members know that Farage is in alliance with those whose desire it is to expand the EU and burden our taxpayers with the vast costs of Ukrainian membership and, ultimately, the free entry into the UK of 45m Ukrainians?

11.12.2013                                                                             B7‑0557/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0558/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0559/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0567/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0568/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0569/2013 } RC1/Am. 9

Amendment  9

Tadeusz Cymański, Zbigniew Ziobro

on behalf of the EFD Group

Joint motion for a resolution

PPE, S&D, ALDE, Verts/ALE, ECR, EFD

Outcome of the Vilnius Summit and the future of the Eastern Partnership, in particular as regards Ukraine

Joint motion for a resolution

Paragraph 2

Joint motion for a resolution

2. Deplores the decision by the Ukrainian authorities, under the lead of President Yanukovych, to withdraw from signing the Association Agreement with the EU during the Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius, despite the clear will on the EU side to continue with the association process, provided the conditions are met; considers this decision to be a major missed opportunity in EU-Ukraine relations and for Ukraine’s aspirations; acknowledges Ukraine’s European aspirations, as expressed in the ongoing demonstrations by Ukrainian civil society in the Euromaidan in Kyiv and in other cities all over Ukraine, which did not hesitate to take its disapproval of President Yanukovych’s decision out onto the streets, and reiterates its view that a deepening of relations between the EU and Ukraine and the fact of offering Ukraine a European perspective are of great significance and in the interests of both parties;

Amendment

2. Deplores the decision by the Ukrainian authorities, under the lead of President Yanukovych, to withdraw from signing the Association Agreement with the EU during the Eastern Partnership Summit in Vilnius, despite the clear will on the EU side to continue with the association process, provided the conditions are met; considers this decision to be a major missed opportunity in EU-Ukraine relations and for Ukraine’s aspirations; acknowledges Ukraine’s European aspirations, as expressed in the ongoing demonstrations by Ukrainian civil society in the Euromaidan in Kyiv and in other cities all over Ukraine, which did not hesitate to take its disapproval of President Yanukovych’s decision out onto the streets, and reiterates its view that a deepening of relations between the EU and Ukraine and the fact of offering Ukraine a roadmap for full EU membership are of great significance and in the interests of both parties;

EXPLANATION:  The words “a European perspective” have been replaced with “roadmap for full EU membership”

ALSO SEE THESE AMENDMENTS

11.12.2013                                                                             B7‑0557/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0558/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0559/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0567/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0568/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0569/2013 } RC1/Am. 7

Amendment  7

Tadeusz Cymański, Zbigniew Ziobro

on behalf of the EFD Group

Joint motion for a resolution

PPE, S&D, ALDE, Verts/ALE, ECR, EFD

Outcome of the Vilnius Summit and the future of the Eastern Partnership, in particular as regards Ukraine

Joint motion for a resolution

Recital F a (new)


Joint motion for a resolution

 

 

Amendment

Fa. whereas up to now the EU has not prepared any realistic policy towards Ukraine to bring it closer to the EU and help the country with its economic problems;

11.12.2013                                                                             B7‑0557/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0558/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0559/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0567/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0568/2013 }

                                                                                               B7‑0569/2013 } RC1/Am. 8

Amendment  8

Tadeusz Cymański, Zbigniew Ziobro

on behalf of the EFD Group

Joint motion for a resolution

PPE, S&D, ALDE, Verts/ALE, ECR, EFD

Outcome of the Vilnius Summit and the future of the Eastern Partnership, in particular as regards Ukraine

Joint motion for a resolution

Recital G a (new)

Joint motion for a resolution

Amendment

Ga. whereas a visa-free regime should be implemented for Ukrainians travelling to the EU;

Farage, Ukip and Political Correctness – Frightened Charlatans

Many people wonder what Farage and his cronies do in Europe.  When supporters of Ukip have read what follows, many will understandably reach the impression that the party is subversive to the interests of the UK.

On Tuesday 10th December, the European Parliament voted on the Estrela Report (A7-0426/2013), which originated from the left wing Committee on Woman’s rights and Gender Equality.

Its ramifications were broad, relating to the imposition on nation states of hard left theology relating to abortion, homosexuality and allied topics.

Amazingly (or not amazingly if one has watched Ukip’s pattern on political correctness), Ukip abstained.  They refused even to back an amendment from conservative members of their own EFD Group.  By contrast, the Tories voted in favour of this and their own amendment (including David Campbell Bannerman), demonstrating considerably more spine than Ukip’s MEPs.  

Fortunately, no thanks to the politically-correct charlatans of Ukip, the Report was defeated by merely seven votes.  Had the vote been closer, the dereliction of duty on the part of the Ukip MEPs would have ensured the Report succeeded.

Many people believe Ukip are anti-political-correctness and broadly patriotic.  This is not the case:  Farage and his cronies are politically-correct cowards, unable and unwilling to follow the wishes of their supporters.  

These are some of the Report’s measures, with appropriate comments where necessary in capitals.  If Ukip’s cowardly inaction had prevented the ECR/EPP motion from being passed then this would have facilitated the passage of the Estrela Report and the motions beneath.

LGTBI refers to ‘lesbian, gay, transgender, bisexual and intermediate’.

Quote:

“7.    Stresses that within the EU and where relevant in its external policies, the EU must ensure that laws and policies are amended, enacted or repealed to respect and protect sexual and reproductive health and rights and enable all individuals to exercise them without discrimination on any grounds;”
COMMENT:  Ukip’s purpose is not to impose more legislation, leave along hostile left wing theology on the UK.

“8.    Emphasises that reproductive choices and fertility services should be provided within a non-discriminatory framework;”
COMMENT:  This encourages health tourism from migrants and others.

“10.    Stresses that forced or coerced sterilisation of any person represents a breach of that person’s human rights and bodily integrity, and calls on the Member States to abolish any existing law that imposes sterilisation;”
COMMENT:   Surely up to member states to decide.   What about the mentally retarded person who cannot make such a decision and cannot look after the child?

“14.    Calls on the Member States to provide access to sexual and reproductive health services through a rights-based approach and without any discrimination on the grounds of ethnic origin, housing status, migration status, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, health or marital status”

COMMENT:  Thus, fertility services for lesbians.  Aren’t children entitled to a mother and a father?

“18.    Calls on the Member States to guarantee sustainable funding to public services and civil society organisations providing services in the field of sexual and reproductive health;”
COMMENT:    Up to member states to decide how they spend their money!

“24.    Urges the Member States and the candidate countries, in view of the impact of the financial and economic crisis on the public health sector, to provide – free of charge or in a manner that is financially accessible – adapted contraceptive information and services and other sexual and reproductive health services, such as annual gynaecological check-ups and mammograms, as well as measures for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of STIs, which include high-quality professional advice and counselling, to all sections of the population, including women in rural areas, young people, ethnic minorities, migrants, people with disabilities, and the socially excluded;”
COMMENT:  Ukip is not against spending money for migrants and health tourists?!

“33.    Recommends that, as a human rights and public health concern, high-quality abortion services should be made legal, safe, and accessible to all within the public health systems of the Member States, including non-resident women, who often seek these services in other countries because of restrictive abortion laws in their country of origin, and to avoid clandestine abortions that seriously endanger women’s physical and mental health;”
COMMENT:  Ukip, clearly, is not opposed to the expenditure of taxpayers’ monies on citizens from overseas countries.

“34.    Underlines that even when legal, abortion is often prevented or delayed by obstacles to the access of appropriate services, such as the widespread use of conscientious objection, medically unnecessary waiting periods or biased counselling; stresses that the Member States should regulate and monitor the use of conscientious objection in the key professions, so as to ensure that reproductive healthcare is guaranteed as an individual’s right, while access to lawful services is ensured and appropriate public referrals systems of good quality are in place; stresses that the right to conscientious objection is an individual right and not a collective policy, and that  advice and counselling must be confidential and non judgmental; is concerned that medical staff are coerced into refusing SRHR services in religion-based hospitals and clinics throughout the EU;”

COMMENT
  Clearly, Farage’s Ukip is not prepared to vote in favour of an amendment that opposes those who would override conscientious objection!

“41.    Calls on the Member States to make sexuality education classes compulsory for all primary and secondary school children and to ensure that space is made available for this subject in school curricula; stresses the importance of regularly reviewing and updating the teaching of sexuality education and of placing special emphasis on respect for women and on gender equality; “
COMMENT:  This is about sex education for five year olds including, doubtless, gay sexual education.

“44.    Calls on the Member States to provide adolescent-friendly sexual and reproductive health services which are in accordance with age, maturity and evolving capacities, which do not discriminate on the grounds of gender, marital status, disability, or sexual orientation/identity, and which are accessible without the consent of parents or guardians;”
COMMENT:  Up to Member States to decide but why should lesbians have fertility treatment?

“51.    Underlines that sexual education must include non-discriminatory information and convey a positive view of LGBTI persons, in order to underpin and protect in an effective manner the rights of young LGBTI people;”
COMMENT: Brainwashing!

“58.    Calls on the Commission and the Member States to address the specific SRHRs of people living with HIV/AIDS, with a focus on the needs of women and at-risk populations, including persons in prostitution, prisoners, migrants and injection-drug users, notably by integrating access to testing and treatment and reversing the underlying socio-economic factors, such as gender inequality and discrimination, contributing to the risk to women and populations at risk of contracting HIV/AIDS;”
COMMENT:  PC Codswallop and what about the costs?

“73.    Supports Recommendation 1903 (2010) of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly to allocate 0.7 % of gross national income to ODA; calls for the EU to maintain this commitment through the financing and implementation of the 2014-2020 European external actions instruments and European Development Fund;”
COMMENT:  In other words, Ukip thinks it acceptable to abstain on an amendment excluding this levy on British taxpayers.

THE EFD, OF WHICH UKIP IS A PART, PRODUCED A SENSIBLE AMENDMENT, PART OF WHICH IS REPRODUCED BENEATH.  
UKIP ABSTAINED.  
THE MEPS ABSTAINING WERE FARAGE, NUTTALL, CLARK, BATTEN, AGNEW, HELMER AND DARTMOUTH.  
WHY?  Even the Tories voted in favour.

A FLAVOUR OF THE AMENDMENT MAY BE FOUND HERE

“Fundamental right to freedom of conscience and freedom of conscientious objection

8.    Upholds the universal human right to conscientious objection together with the responsibility of the state to ensure that patients are able to access lawful medical care in a timely manner, in particular in cases of emergency prenatal and maternal health care; recalls that no person, hospital or institution should be coerced, held liable or discriminated against in any manner because of a refusal to perform, accommodate, assist or submit to an abortion or any act which could cause the death of a human foetus or embryo, for any reason;
European Union competences on this matter

9.    Notes that it is a competence of the Member States to formulate and implement policies on SRHR;

10.    Notes that it is a competence of the Member States to formulate and implement policies on sexual education in schools;

11.    Invites, therefore, the EU institutions, bodies and agencies to comply with EU law and refrain from any intervention in this policy area that seeks to re-interpret the legal basis;
Sexuality education implemented by the Member States

12.    Recognises the rights, duties and responsibilities of parents and other persons legally responsible for adolescents to provide, in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the adolescent, appropriate direction and guidance in sexual and reproductive matters;

13.    Recalls – in accordance with the principle of ‘public policy doctrine’ and internationally accepted standards – that a child’s parents or legal guardians have the freedom to ensure that the child receives an education in conformity with their own convictions, and that children should not be compelled to receive teaching on sexuality education, including the promotion of SRHR and abortion, against the wishes of their parents or legal guardians, the best interests of the child being the guiding principle; 

14.    Recalls that the right of parents to educate their children according to their religious or non-religious convictions includes their right to refuse any undue interference by state or non-state actors in their education;

15.    Emphasises that sexuality education is particularly necessary given that young people have access, from an early age, to pornographic and degrading content, especially via the internet; emphasises, therefore, that sexuality education must be part of a broader, supportive approach to young people’s emotional development so as to enable them to form mutually respectful relationships with members of the opposite sex; encourages the Member States to introduce campaigns directed at parents and at adults who work with young people, in order to raise their awareness of the harmful effects of pornography on adolescents;
Prenatal and maternal health in development policies

16.    Invites the Commission to ensure that EU development cooperation includes an explicit focus on, and concrete targets for, prenatal and maternal health;

17.    Calls on the EEAS, through the EU Delegations in developing countries, to work with the governments of those countries to ensure that female children enjoy their rights without discrimination based on their sex, inter alia by ending the unethical and discriminatory practices of prenatal sex selection, abortion of female foetuses, female infanticide, early forced marriage and female genital mutilation;

18.    Invites the Commission to maintain in its development priorities access to quality, affordable, acceptable and accessible prenatal and maternal health care services, to relational, affective and sexual education for boys and girls, which, in line with Article 26(3) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is the prior responsibility of their parents, and to voluntary family planning, including natural family planning methods, while combating sex-based discrimination leading to sex-selective and involuntary abortions, forced sterilisation and sexual violence, as well as ensuring the provision of prenatal and maternal health care supplies, including HIV prevention, treatment, care and support without discrimination;

19.    Reaffirms the sovereign right of each state to react to the proposals of the present resolution in conformity with its own national laws, with full respect for the various religious and ethical values and cultural backgrounds of its people (the ‘public policy doctrine’), and in conformity with universally recognised international human rights;”

THE ECR, WHICH INCLUDES THE TORIES, ALSO OPPOSED THE ESTELA REPORT AND PRODUCED THEIR OWN MOTION IN ITS PLACE.

1.    Notes that the formulation and implementation of policies on SRHR and on sexual education in schools is a competence of the Member States;

2.     Notes that, even though it is a competence of the Member States to formulate and implement policies on health and on education, the EU can contribute to the promotion of best practices among Member States;

3.    Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and national parliaments of the Member States, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and the UN Secretary-General.

ABSTAINING WERE FARAGE, NUTTALL, HELMER (AGAINST HIS EX COLLEAGUES IN THE TORY PARTY WHO, CLEARLY, FEEL LESS CONSTRAINED THAN HE DOES UNDER FARAGE) , CLARK, BATTEN, AGNEW AND DARTMOUTH.

CONCLUSION:    Few people who have read the above would dispute the statement that Ukip, under the leadership of Farage, is a politically-correct organisation, incapable of opposing left wing theology and is guilty of a dereliction of duty.   Those who have observed Ukip’s voting habits in Europe will be unsurprised by this latest betrayal.


 

And don’t say it doesn’t matter because the vote was defeated.  Farage and co abstaining was still if not duplicitous at very least cowardly! 

To view the original as first published CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

2013 Was Another Catastrophic Electoral Year For UKIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 23/12/2013

2013 Was Another Catastrophic Electoral Year For UKIP
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

2013 Was Another Catastrophic Electoral Year For UKIP with only 15 Councillors elected out of 337 seats available and catastrophic losses amonghst the ranks of Councillors already elected and MEPs who departed!

Only a fool would buy into the spin and propaganda UKIP desperately peddles though to be fair The Tories and a few low grade journalists would seem to have more than their fair share of such fools!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

Sunday, 22 December 2013

REVIEW OF COUNCIL BY ELECTIONS FOR 2013

Thanks again to MiddleEnglander and his good work for collating this information.

There have been 337 principal local council by-elections during 2013, including those on 2nd May, with 97 (29%) changing hands.

Party   Candidates    Defended     Retained      Gained       Lost        Won Retention Rate
Conservative          332         145           98          17         47         115          68%
Labour          290         117         108          30           9         138          92%
Lib Dems          233           42           23          15         19           38          55%
UKIP          228             3          15           3           15            0%
SNP            14             6           6            0%
Plaid Cymru              9             1             1             1        100%
Green          114             5             2            1           3             3          40%
Kidderminster Health              2            1             1
Liberal              2            1             1
Resident Groups *            23             3             2            4           1             6          67%
Independent **          115           14             6          13           8           19          43%
BNP            21
English Democrat            12             1           1            0%
National Front              5
Socialist (GB)              4
TUSAC            34
Other            30
Total       1,468         337         240           97         97         337          71%

Conservatives had official candidates in in 98.5% of the by-elections, Labour in 86%, Lib Dems in 69% whilst UKIP contested 68%.

Conservatives gained 1 seat from UKIP
– whilst losing 10 to UKIPl

Labour gained 1 seat UKIP
– whilst losing 2 to UKIP

Liberal Democrats lost 2 seats to UKIP

UKIP gained 10 seats from Conservatives, 2 from both Labour and Lib Dems and 1 from English Democrats
– whilst losing 1 each to Conservative, Labour and Kidderminster Health

Kidderminster Health Concern gained a seat from UKIP

English Democrats lost a seat to UKIPSo all in all it was yet another catastrophic showing for UKIP in that out of 1,468 candidates UKIP only fielded 228 in the 337 seats being contested or 68% of the seats were contested by UKIP.Astonishingly despite the huge amount of spin from UKIP they were yet again a catastrophic failure electorally with 3 seats being defended they lost all 3 and they only managed to have 15 people elected out of the 337 seats up for election!

Similarly in the last Local Government elections less than 150 UKIP candidates were elected out of some 1,700 seats and of those a significant number have been displaced or forced to resign whilst not a single seat was gained in the General Election nor seats in the EU Regional Assemblies of Scotland, Wales, London or ant mainland region followed by total failure in both the Mayoral Elections & the Police Crime Commissioner Elections.

To add to Farage’s embarrassment during the period he has lost at least 1/3rd. of his MEPs with Marta Andreassen & David Bannerman defecting to the Tories, Nikki Sinclaire leaving on both a point of principle, unwilling to associate with the extremist and racist chums of Farage on his EFD Group, with Trevor Coleman & Mike Nattrass following her example and then Farage found even his flatmate & drinking buddy out performed him and drew attention away from him and had to be removed.

Allround UKIP’s electoral achievements have been a catastrophy having failed to make even realistic progress in Parliamentary by elections, such that one might reasonably and rationally have expectations that UKIP might gain a single seat in the 2015 Westminster Elections.

It is little or no consequence that UKIP will be seen as a dustbin for the protest vote in the utterlu insignificant EU elections next May – when clearly the public have seen through their act and recognised the void at their core that means that even after 20 years they have absolutely no credible exit and survival strategy relative to The EU and lack even a basic understanding of tactics, strategy and campaigning as displayed by the abject debacle of the London Mayoral Elections and the realisation that the Party system of selecting candidates is nothing more than a democratic fraud enabling Farage to dole out places to his sycophants and drinking chums – however low grade they clearly are.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

UKIP Confirmed as More A Dustbin for Protest Votes

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/12/2013

UKIP Confirmed as More A Dustbin for Protest Votes
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

UKIP Defined as being only The Farage Cult & many marginalised members and Confirmed as More A Dustbin for Protest Votes, than any real General Election thret!

Notable that the meeeja accepts they have misread the runes of the polls!

 .
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

Nigel Farage’s plans don’t affect the price of fish (yet)

The more successful Ukip is, the harder it is for him to maintain the anti-politics pose

Allow me to introduce you to the Four-Square Rule. The Conservatives need to be four points ahead of Labour in share of the vote if they are to remain the largest party in the House of Commons. A four-point Tory lead is therefore where the parties are “all square”. It is the break-even point between the Tories having the most seats, in which case David Cameron stays on as Prime Minister, and Labour overtaking them, in which case Ed Miliband moves in.

As the year ends, the Tories are on average five points behind in the opinion polls. That should not be too discouraging for Cameron. To go from five points behind to four points ahead seems a less than Herculean task, especially if voters start to feel better off next year, which seems likely.

Except that there is a bluebottle in the ointment – Nigel Farage. Number 10 was spooked last week by a full-page advertisement in The Daily Telegraph taken out by Alan Bown, a UK Independence Party donor, who has paid for polls in eight target seats. The polls were scary for numerate Conservatives, suggesting that the Labour vote was up by more in Conservative-Labour marginals than in national polls; that the Tory vote was down further than would be expected; and that Ukip was doing better than expected. In some places, this would hand Tory seats to Labour, with Ukip pushing the Tory candidate into third place.

Certainly, the Conservatives should take Ukip seriously. Lots of people want to vote Ukip, and for reasons which are not as unrespectable as is often pretended. Many of the party’s policies are nonsense, as anyone who has tried to reconcile its spending promises with its plans to cut taxes and borrowing can attest. But the impulse behind them is widely shared. Ukip is more than a conservative party, it is a party of reaction. It wants to go back to before 1971, when the UK Parliament could decide who was allowed to live in this country, when there were grammar schools (and secondary moderns) everywhere and marriage was heterosexual.

Farage is a brilliant leader of this popular emotion. Like Alex Salmond and George Galloway he is a separatist, adept at promising to separate people from reality. Like them, he is poorly understood by Westminster journalists, which is why we anticipated the SNP victory in Scotland in 2011 so poorly and Galloway’s win in the Bradford West by-election not at all. The European Parliament elections next year will give Ukip a good platform. “Half of the Tory tribe goes off and supports Ukip,” says a senior, gloomy Conservative. They treat European elections “like a weekend retreat”.

It will test the Prime Minister’s nerve, but there is a limit to populism. I hope that the Scottish people will show in September that an anti-London vote is one thing, independence quite another. Galloway cannot get himself elected in the same seat twice. And a year after Ukip won 17 per cent of the vote in the European Parliament elections in 2009, it secured 3 per cent in the general election. Ukip has money and members but not much time to build an organisation capable of electing MPs.

Then Farage comes up against another limit. The more successful Ukip is, the harder it is for him to maintain the anti-politics pose. His dinner with Rupert Murdoch in March made him look like just another politician; and it is notable that he rarely mentions same-sex marriage, although it really animates his new recruits.

His reluctance is part of his desire to keep his party away from some of the fruitier cakes of the better yesterday brigade, such as Godfrey Bloom, the former Ukip MEP who yesterday accused Farage of having done a deal with the Tories to stand aside in some seats in return for a peerage. (As if: the party would lynch him.)

However, Ukip is still a problem for the Conservatives. Bown’s polls confirm that Ukip has taken twice as many voters from the Tories as from Labour. But Labour is unlikely to win Thanet South as the result of a Ukip surge. If Farage stood, he could affect the result in one seat, but polls in individual constituencies have a poor record of predicting general elections, especially this far in advance.

National opinion polls are a better guide. In them, Ukip’s support currently averages 12 per cent – a long way from “breakthough”. And if Ukip does not break through, the only thing that matters is whether it takes more votes from the Tories than from Labour. The crucial point is that the damage Ukip has done to the Tories has already been done, and the Tories are only five points behind Labour. The question is whether Ukip will win over even more Tory voters rather than Labour ones between now and the election. I don’t think so.

Certainly, by the end of last week, Cameron’s advisers had calmed down about those Ukip polls, saying that they “hadn’t changed the price of fish very much”. They have to say that, of course, but I think they are broadly right. The success of Ukip makes it a harder for Cameron to get four points ahead of Labour, as required by the Four-Square Rule, but that is still an achievable target.

To view the original post CLICK HERE

FARAGE, Nigel 76

Or to put it more succinctly Farage and his cult of followers can be expected to do quite well in the EU elections but there is no reason to consider them in either the General Election of 2015 or the 2015 Local Elections.Consider the last EU election where they could claim 17% but the catastrophic collapse in the subsequent General Election where they gained an insignificant % and were nowhere near winning a single seat & where in the Local Elections out of almost 2,000 Local Seats up for election they were elected in less than 150.

Since which date a number of those who were elected have departed whether fired by the party for seemingly being a challenge to Farage or due to racist style foot in mouth blunders. Also let us not forget Farage has lost over 1/3rd. of his MEPs who have either quit his clique in disgust or defected to the Tories!

Then Farage has the further humiliation of the results of the 2013 by elections where out of 337 seats up for election UKIP were elected to a risible 15!

As we have stated again and again Farage and his lack of credible gravitas, rational policies or understanding of either the word Libertarian or the EU’s insignificance; as merely a rubber stamping office for global Governance, WTO, CODEX, UN etc.; have all reduced his party to being little more than the clown party, acting as a dustbin for protest votes, and now for that matter the dustbin for failed Tories and ex members of the BNP now that the BNP has collapsed.
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Farage embroiled in row over lack of leadership

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/12/2013

Farage embroiled in row over lack of leadership
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Nigel Farage embroiled in row over lack of leadership of UKIP! David Gale’s open letter published with comments at CLICK HERE!

Allegations by David Gale of criminality in UKIP were reported on 30-Nov-2013 to the Chief Constable of Derbyshire – to date his force seem indifferent to crime that is not fully investigated for them and seem particularly lazy & incompetent.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

Nigel Farage embroiled in row over lack of leadership

Claims by former prospective MEP David Gale regarding Ukip leadership trigger debate over party direction
  • Saturday 21 December 2013 20.51 GMT
Nigel Farage

Nigel Farage has become involved in a row over allegations that Ukip’s leadership failed to act on serious matters of governance. Photograph: Gareth Fuller/PA

Nigel Farage has become embroiled in a potentially damaging internal row over allegations that Ukip’s leadership has failed to act on serious matters of governance, including taking steps to dissociate the party from a convicted paedophile.

The incendiary accusations have seen a former prospective Ukip MEP resign from the party and led to toxic claims that the party lacks a robust system for examining internal complaints.

But a Ukip spokeswoman has said the claims had no foundation, had been investigated, and were the views of a disgruntled member who had failed to get the party to back his candidacy.

In a letter to Farage, obtained by the Observer, David Gale, interim chief executive of Kids for Cash UK, a charity that campaigns against paedophiles, said he had no choice but to resign from the party after becoming frustrated that his fears about a registered sex offender and Ukip supporter were not being taken seriously. The issue was also raised by other members of Ukip, according to emails sent to its chairman, Steve Crowther, seen by the Observer.

“The party’s response has been absolutely extraordinary,” Gale said. “They’ve done nothing. This is another example of Ukip’s structural weaknesses.” Gale suggested the party had chosen to close ranks rather than examine his allegations. In claims fiercely denied by the party, Gale warns Farage: “There is a core faction associated with the party that is being used as a ‘Black Ops’ dirty tricks team against targets that include party members.”

He tells Farage: “I believe that your own deep insecurity and paranoia have played a significant part in the party’s Night of the Long Knives” – a reference to a recent purge when a number of party members were asked to leave Ukip.

Gale, who stood as a Ukip police and crime commissioner, claimed there was evidence social media were being manipulated by people close to the party.

“There is increasing evidence that points to Ukip members close to the party’s headquarters being involved in the creation of cloned Facebook pages which have featured damaging fake posts falsely attributed to Ukip members,” Gale writes. “Screen grabs of these posts have been fed to the press, third hand, in an attempt to smear the targeted individuals and as a precursor to removing them from the party. These are potentially criminal acts.”

The accusations have been bandied back and forth in recent weeks, triggering an internal debate among Ukip’s members about the party’s direction. A number are concerned that Ukip has become too centralised under Farage and that Crowther has failed to act on serious allegations involving fraud, claims denied by the party.

“I have been raising the issue of the lack of scrutiny and governance within the party’s management,” Gale tells Farage. “One of the starkest examples of this lack of governance has been the tolerance of the party’s continued association with a convicted paedophile who, whilst no longer being a member, has continued to attend party functions and provide strategic Ukip documentation from his personal website.”

Gale said he had supplied evidence of the registered sex offender’s continued involvement with Ukip to the party. The man, whose name is known to the Observer, has campaigned on its behalf and blogs on party issues. He was placed on the sex offenders register for life in 1999, having served a 30-month sentence for offences involving children.

Gale told Farage: “My efforts to raise the alarm have been ignored by the leadership, it being left to me to contact branches to alert them to potential risks to members and to have photographs of the paedophile campaigning for Ukip removed from branch websites.”

A Ukip spokeswoman said Gale’s complaints had been investigated fully. “These are entirely bogus allegations,” she said. “They represent a deliberate attempt to cause trouble for the party by someone on his departure.”

However, the row raises questions over Farage’s leadership. Considered to be the party’s greatest asset, there are questions among Ukip grassroots members about whether Farage is focused on gaining a seat in the House of Lords.

“It’s no secret Farage is focused on a peerage,” Gale said.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Allegations by David Gale of criminality in UKIP were reported on 30-Nov-2013 to the Chief Constable of Derbyshire – to date his force seems indifferent to crime that is not fully investigated for them and seem particularly lazy & incompetent.
SEE: CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Bloom’s Political Stupidity Only Outstripped by Farage’s Incompetence .

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 21/12/2013

Bloom’s Political Stupidity Only Outstripped by Farage’s Incompetence .

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Godfrey Bloom’s Barking Political Stupidity Only Outstripped by his own 1950s caricature of a Drill Sergeant & Nigel Farage’s utter Incompetence as a Leader!!
.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

.

Hi,

whether one likes Godfrey Bloom or Nigel Farage is not of any consequence, in the field of politics they are both dangerous fools in political terms, with their childish antics and undeniable racism and lack of competence or gravitas that is doing so much harm to the EUroSceptic cause.

Clearly the more dangerous is Nigel Farage, as some people are gullible enough to ‘follow’ him, resulting in his destruction of UKIP as a political party and its replacement with his cult led by a Harry Enfieldesque – braying, strident caricature of a 1980s Hurray Henry.

One need only watch him being lampooned by Diane Abbott & Michael Portillo and mocked by Andrew Neal
on: CLICK HERE

Bloom lets out a great snort.
He’s not interested. He’s not interested in the running of the party, or in making policy.
He’s Ukip’s chief salesman, that’s what Nigel is.

Nigel’s not interested in the running of the party, or making policy.

He’s Ukip’s chief salesman’Farage, he despairs, can’t take criticism, goes to pieces in a crisis, is really a conservative, and doesn’t even want to lead the party. “He’s not a team player, you see.

He didn’t play rugger. Plays golf!”

Bloom accuses Ukip’s leader of pursuing an “Ein Führer” leadership policy and a “No-policy” policy agenda, and claims Farage has already struck a secret election deal with the Tories in return for a seat in the Lords
.
These are some of the kinder things Bloom says about his flatmate Farage.

Having studied and dealt with Nigel Farage for well over a dozen years I regret Godfrey Bloom, liability to the EUroSceptic cause that he is, is spot on accurate about Nigel Farage, his incompetence, his insecurity and his thirst for position and money that clearly overide all other considerations.

It is quite astonishing that so many of the lesser Tories see Farage’s cult as a threat in any real terms though clearly UKIP has beguilled some of the more gullible – as Farage points out at every opportunity: A huge percentage of UKIP voters have absolutely no interest in politics and didn’t even vote in previous elections!

I for one do not feel that a drunken, braying entertainer represents me or British values in any way whatsoever!

Bloom reminds me of the small child, of whom the vain are warned, as he shouts out ‘The Emperor has no clothes on‘.

Let us not forget that Godfrey Bloom was dishonestly and corruptly put in place by Nigel Farage – yet another display of his incompetence in man management and ineptitude in character judgement that has marred his efforts to be taken seriously as a politician and not seen as a latter day Arthur Daley used car salesman, braying bon viveur and crashing bore, pint in hand & so common in many pubs, with a following of supporters, for as long as he buys the drinks!

Ukip’s Godfrey Bloom: ‘I just can’t resist a punch-up’

Godfrey Bloom split from Ukip in dramatic style earlier this year after an infamous speech denouncing aid to ‘bongo bongo land’ and a bust-up with party leader Nigel Farage. They’re still mates, he says – but perhaps not after Nigel reads this

Godfrey Bloom formerly of ukip

‘Nigel’s not interested in the running of the party, or making policy. He’s Ukip’s chief salesman’ … Godfrey Bloom. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian

Godfrey Bloom‘s study in his Yorkshire home looks so exactly as one would expect that it could almost be a stage set.

The walls are lined with military figurines, sporting trophies, photos of rugby teams and a ceremonial cricket bat, and the occupant plays the part of a blimpish ex-army caricature with terrific brio. He barks, “Bloom here. Hello my dear boy!” down the phone, refers to his wife as “Mrs Bloom”, wears a tweed cap, drives an MG, and loves to get roaring drunk.

He’d enjoyed a particularly satisfactory seven-hour drinking session in Brussels only two days earlier.“Hit it hard. And the beer there is all five on the Richter scale.

At the rugby club it’s 3.5. I can drink 3.5 all day.” His recent memoir is a lament for the 50s and the golden era of empire, the vernacular of “iffy” and “whizzo” and a cavalier approach to punctuation evidently all his own work, unless PG Wodehouse has taken up ghostwriting. Incorrigibly unbiddable and surprisingly camp, he reminds me of Giles Brandreth.

Unlike most politicians, Bloom loves to be interviewed, because “I never have to worry about what I said last time, because I’ve never changed my views.” About anything? “No. Never.” His brain, he boasts, tapping a temple, is “hermetically sealed.”

But beneath all the sergeant’s mess cliches there seems to be a surprisingly thoughtful person.
A former financial analyst, he likes to digress into little lessons on economic history, and obviously wishes people would see what an erudite intellectual he is. “Most people don’t know how the government fiddles the numbers. I do.”

He’s a dreadful show off, so there are constant references to political theorists, but he is genuinely interested in ideas, and certainly cleverer than most people probably imagine.

Whether anyone could ever be as clever as he likes to see himself, I am not sure.

When I ask who the brain of Ukip is today he hoots, “There are no brains of the party.” It used to be him? “Well, certainly one of the leading brains, yes.”

What about Nigel Farage – what’s he like when it comes to policy? Bloom lets out a great snort. “He’s not interested. He’s not interested in the running of the party, or in making policy. He’s Ukip’s chief salesman, that’s what Nigel is.”

Bloom and Farage have been great friends ever since the early days of Ukip. They share a flat in Brussels, a near-identical sense of humour and a manner so alike that if I close my eyes it could be Farage in the room. But at Ukip’s conference in September the leader withdrew the party whip from his friend in a fury, after Bloom risked an ill-advised joke about women being “sluts”, and whacked the Channel 4 news reporter Michael Crick over the head with a rolled-up conference programme.

Bloom refers to the ding-dong as “Crickgate”, and is not unaware of its comic dimension.I’m sure Bloom had resolved not to say anything unkind about Farage today – and on a personal level he mostly manages to be generous and warm.

When it comes to politics, however, he cannot help himself. Farage, he despairs, can’t take criticism, goes to pieces in a crisis, is really a conservative, and doesn’t even want to lead the party.

“He’s not a team player, you see. He didn’t play rugger. Plays golf!” Bloom accuses Ukip’s leader of pursuing an “Ein Führer” leadership policy and a “No-policy” policy agenda, and claims Farage has already struck a secret election deal with the Tories in return for a seat in the Lords.

Relations had been breaking down since the spring, when Farage appeared to change his mind about flat tax in the middle of Question Time.

Bloom asked what was going on, and “I got a quite hysterical text back: ‘Your job is to get out there delivering leaflets instead of asking me about policy!’

I thought, I’m your economics spokesman. You want me to deliver leaflets? Hysterical!”

Things got worse in July after Bloom’s infamous speech denouncing foreign aid to “Bongo bongo land”. Unnerved by the media uproar, Farage told him to apologise. “I said, ‘I don’t do apologies. If you keep a cool head, you will find it swings my way.'”

I don’t know anyone who changed their mind and decided “Bongo bongo land” wasn’t highly offensive after all – but Bloom insists: “We got more than 15,000 emails, only 47 against. I think we can deduce from that that I had massive public support.” But that was when the real trouble set in.

Link to video: Godfrey Bloom hits journalist Michael Crick with Ukip brochure

Farage complained to him: “Whenever I’m interviewed now, people want to talk about you.” Bloom thinks his friend became threatened by his media profile and public popularity, and that Crickgate had a lot to do with jealousy. “I’d taken the spotlight off his speech, that’s what it was all about! It was toys out of the pram.

Let’s be brutally honest. He panicked.

” Farage should have simply said the matter was being investigated, the media were “trying to crack us, but we’re going to stick together”, and moved on. “And the whole audience would have cheered.” He parodies the speech Farage did actually make, putting on a petulant, high-pitched wail and flapping his arms over his shoulders. “That’s it! Conference is ruined! Oh the conference is ruined!’

You know what one elderly Ukip lady said to me afterwards?” he can’t resist adding, “‘He gives girls a bad name’.”

When Farage phoned him up, “He’d lost it badly. Oh, he was really in pieces. It was: ‘Conference is over! No one’s going to look at my speech now!'” But later that day the party secretary told Bloom not to worry, assuring him, “We’ll smooth it all over.

We can’t afford to lose you, you’re too popular.” Bloom woke up the next day, “and there was Nigel Farage on the television, sacking me. I turn on and I’m being sacked on the telly!

It was like seeing your father disinherit you on TV because you broke a casserole dish.”Bloom didn’t think Crickgate had been that big a deal – “Nothing more than if I’d whacked a wasp in a pub garden”.

He doesn’t see how his dismissal could have had anything to do with the sluts joke or the Crick wallop, because his name was removed from the party’s MEP list less than 90 minutes later, before any investigation could have taken place. And he claims Ukip’s success in the north is almost entirely down to him, adding: “I’ve put more money into this party than Paul Sykes has up here. £150 grand. Yeah. From my private savings.

“So why,” he asks, “would they get rid of a huge electoral asset?” He feigns bafflement, before practically shouting: “Because I am diametrically opposed to any deal with the Conservative party! I would never have agreed to it, on a matter of a principle – so I had to go.

According to Bloom, Ukip is in the grip of an internal battle for its future.

At HQ “they are all stabbing each other in the back”, and the grassroots are being deliberately squeezed out. “They have been purged. This is 1933 Germany, night of the long knives. I’m waiting to be dragged out of the pub and butchered.

This is New Ukip now. And they are looking for a deal with the Tories.

Officially, Ukip’s politics are libertarian. But Bloom says Farage has always really been a Conservative, is “desperate to be a Conservative again”, and would pack it all in if we would just get out of Europe and crack down on immigration. “But we’re winning those arguments. We’ve broken through.

Now we’re in phase two. We’ve said what we don’t want, and now we have to say what we do want.

Farage, apparently, disagrees.

The party’s radical libertarian ideas frighten him. More importantly, they would make an electoral pact with the Tories in 2015 much trickier. And so, says Bloom, he has been marginalising grassroots members, sacking troublesome rivals, and turning himself into “a professional politician, with a professional party, so he can be within some alliance with the Conservative party”.

Bloom had to be elbowed out before a pact could be agreed. “And,” he says with confidence, “the deal has already now been done.

He’s unclear on its precise details, but certain that Farage’s reward for standing down Ukip candidates in key seats is a title and a seat in the House of Lords.

Would he want that? Bloom chuckles knowingly – “Not for him, of course!” – and adopts a weaselly, ever-so-‘umble voice. “‘But should one be forced upon me, then for the good of the party, and if people felt I could better serve there, well then … ‘ Of course he would!”Remarkably, Bloom and Farage are still friends. They met a few weeks after conference – in a pub, of course – and decided the disagreement was “strictly professional”. But Bloom isn’t going quietly. He says the whole business has been a blessing – his media profile has doubled, and he’s showered in good will wherever he goes.

“Now I don’t have Ukip antichrist on my forehead, everybody’s much friendlier! Really, it’s a weight off my shoulders. Because now I’m not hamstrung by the no-policy policy, I can start to talk about policy.”

 

Link to video: Godfrey Bloom: ‘bongo bongo land’ is not racist

Bloom would do away with the welfare state in its entirety, and “get back to the self-help we had in the 19th century. I’m a big believer in Friendly Societies.” Income tax would be flat, all drug use would be decriminalised, and drivers could drink as much as they liked, as long as they could prove they were still fit to drive. (“I could drive perfectly well after four pints.”)

The NHS would no longer be free, and in fact it would be a crime to call any public provision “free”. He’s deviating a little here from libertarian principle, he admits. “But it’s not free! We all have to pay for it.

We disagree about literally everything. But though I think his politics are wrong in every way, they aren’t irrational, nor a ragbag of random prejudice. Every now and then he’ll lapse into rugby club after-dinner speaker mode, which is hectoring and boring. But most of the time he is really thinking, and doesn’t get defensive about flaws in his logic, but positively lights up.

He says he wants strict, Canadian-style immigration controls, but surely, I suggest, once he’s got rid of the welfare state he should open our borders to the world.

The population would self-regulate by everyone competing on a level playing field, and indigenous Britons who didn’t like it could move elsewhere. He looks faintly startled, but quickly thinks it through. “If we could get rid of the welfare state that would work, ye-es. There would be no need for controls. Subject to criminal and health checks, of course.

Followed through to its logical conclusion, Bloom’s libertarianism leads him to problematic places. When he fails to justify opposing gay marriage on libertarian grounds, he admits, “Well, I do want to conserve some things.” He wants to protect people like the Christian B&B owners who turned away a gay couple, arguing “they should be allowed to say exactly who comes in and out of their property”.

Presumably pub landlords then should be allowed to put signs in their window saying “No blacks”?

“Oh. Never really thought about it, actually.” He swears he has never understood racism, doesn’t even notice skin colour, and can’t imagine why any publican would turn away customers. But after careful consideration he says, “Well, I do believe a publican should be allowed to say who he has in his establishment. So yes, his gaff, his rules.”

Given the hot water this should land him in, I find the loyalty to his own libertarian logic oddly touching.

I sincerely hope he’s wrong in thinking most voters share his views. He has decided not to stand as an independent MEP next year – “I wouldn’t have any trouble winning. But do I want to? Nah. Ten years of this game’s enough.” But he might run for Westminster in 2015.

“I just can’t resist a punch-up, that’s the trouble really. I just think it would be a bit of a lark, wouldn’t it?”

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

.

Just to correct a couple of facts – Godfrey Bloom is still a member of Nigel Farage’s extremist, racist and anti homosexual EFD Group in the EU. Godfrey Bloom & Farage still sharwe a flat. Nigel Farage has NOT withdrawn the whip from Godfrey Bloom as in EU politics the concept of whipping ones political party or political group is expressly forbidden. There is every possibility that Nigel Farage will reinstate Godfrey Bloom as lead candidate in the EU election in May at the very last minute just as he has the authority to replace any and all the candidates at the last minute – probably a neccessity when one looks at how low grade the present bunch are – sadly however with Farage leading the cult only low grade populist candidates, and rejects & failures from other parties, seem attracted to UKIP.

Farage would seem to have ensured that not a single solitary candidate of any stature or ethical merit features on his list of wannabe wealthy MEPs, lead candidates of singular obscurity backed by gutter sweepings of the Farage fan club, seeing it as an opportunity to ingratiate their way to a hand out from Farage’s funding on the gravy train!

.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW
 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU  

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Nattrass further Berates the Farage Cult – UKIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 19/12/2013

#Nattrass further Berates the Farage Cult – UKIP

.

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

.

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

.

Mike Nattrass further Berates the Nigel Farage Cult – UKIP & its racist base in the EFD!

 

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

 

.

 

 

 

HAPPY NEW YEAR and CHERIO TO UKIP

 

crewe and nantwich by election candidate mike nattrass   PSCI have been your MEP since 2004 and have fought for the Independence movement since standing at Dudley in 1994. I was UKIP Party Chairman under Jefferey Titford and UKIP Deputy Leader under Roger Knapman.

 

Over that period I have reported to you on amazing situations in the EU parliament including debates on the length of chicken’s beaks and “how much wine there is in a wine gum.” My opposition to  HS2 changed the UKIP policy, an EU inspired railway under project TEN-T. My opposition to the Hartlebury Incinerator highlighted poor value by the imposition of EU regulations. I was instrumental in saving flood defences in Warwick, which subsequently proved very necessary. I was pleased to save Walsall Market from Councillors who preferred to take the redevelopment money over their duty as trustees to protect this ancient market tradition.

 

 I was one of the three MEPs to fund and present a national petition to 10 Downing Street. This provoked the vote in the House of Commons which embarrassed the Government. The referendum debate has continued ever since.

 

In one year my reports about the EU from within, made 1100 newspaper “hits” thanks to Craig Winyard helping me in my office with the press targets.

 

You will know that I was deselected by Nigel Farage for the European 2014 election. At the subsequent court case it was stated that this was because I was “disloyal” Why?, because I reported to the UKIP NEC that racism existed in the EFD Group. I criticised Nigel Farage, leader of the group, for not rejecting these people. My input was later proven to be correct when an Italian Group member ”Mario Borghezio” supported the views of the Norwegian mass murderer and went on to abuse a black Italian lady Government Minister. But I was rewarded by de-selection!

 

I finally resigned from UKIP when Nigel Farage in a Strasbourg MEP meeting explained the legal means (under the UKIP Constitution) by which he was able to rig/change members votes in the candidate selection process, saying that it had already been done in the London Assembly elections. I had also campaigned against the revised UKIP Constitution which allowed this process and effectively gives power to one man. If you need more information about any of the above please ask, as this information is correct. My assistants Jane, Jill, Syd and Paul remain in the Hampton in Arden MEP offices.  0121 333 7737  should you wish to speak.

 

Thus, with no other option, a new party was born in November 2013. AN INDEPENDENCE PARTY with a clear logo (see below) and a clear slogan “UK REFERENDUM and OUT” If you wish to follow party progress please try www.aipmep.org  or if you never again wish to hear from me, please respond by letter or email to aipmep@hotmail.co.uk and I will not darken your door/letterbox again. On 22nd May 2014 AN INDEPENDENCE PARTY will stand in all English and Welsh Constituencies and should you wish to stand in 2014 or in 2015, please send your details. Mike MIKE NATTRASS, AN INDEPENDENCE PARTY MEP Better off out

AN INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.aipmep.org

 

 

 

Clearly Mike Nattrass has fallen out with Farage, and rightly so, but his endless dithering one minute resigning from Farage’s racist & extremist EFD Group, yet shortly after rejoining to enhance his chances of selection after his outspoken, all be it accurate, attack on Farage had every display of lack of moral fiber.

 

NATTRASS, Mike 01

 

Clearly Mike Nattrass has little to offer as an MEP and in his two stints to date he has been conspicuous by his inconsequentiality with his relatively limp attempts to address transport issues, his unconvincing efforts to oppose HS2, where he had no clear campaign or strategy being largely reactive to any opportunity to promote himself in the media.

You will note his consideration of the length of chickens’ beaks to have been of consequence and substance.

To be fair his support of Nikki Sinclaire’s petition initiative must surely have helped her obtain some additional signatures, as wi8th the various other MPs & MEPs she marshalled for the campaign that eventually led to her forcing Cameron to hold a debate on the issue of EU membership and eventually promise a referendum, which we now hear he intends to ring fence in law by enactment of The Parliament Act top ensure whoever forms the next Government is bound to hold an In/Out ReferendumWell done Nikki Sinclaire and thanks to the many who, like Mike Nattrass, supported her efforts. Clearly Mike Nattrass invested wisely in the past to get himself elected, frequently fooling the more gullible to believe he was generously financing UKIP!

A measure of just how weak UKIP’s position has become is displayed by their clear lack of a credible MEP candidate in the West Midlands, pleasant and well meaning as their local Parich Councillor Jill Seymour may be she is hopelessly out of her depth as a prospective MEP, now that Nikki Sinclaire will be standing as a candidate for We Demand A Referendum.

The We Demand A Referendum cause which the ill advised Nattrass seeks to piggy back on, using the same concept but only likely to harm the cause.

Presumably the large shuffle of his staff is geared to being able to fund candidates for the upcoming election, in which there is little doubt, with Nattrass’s dithering skills and poor selection of allies

NATRASS New Britain 01
and his dalliance with the buffoons in the English Democrat Party and the toxic Tillbrook!
Tend to ensures all his candidates are likely to lose their deposits and when you think the bill for paper alone, for election leaflets, is likely to exceed £20,000 if he wishes to hit every home one must wonder at the man’s sanity in what seems to be an ego fueled bitter attack on having been outmaneuvered by Farage and his cult.

Clearly Nattrass is likely to do considerably more harm than good to the EUroSceptic cause as sadly will Farage’s Party with their cheap pandering to an anti immigrant policy from a foundation amongst their associates of undeniable racist extremism.

I also find Nattrass to be not only stupid, as displayed by his rush to the courts to try to use the courts to overturn UKIP’s corrupted constitution and the powers granted to Farage, their star performer, within his own fiefdom.

Not to mention his foolish sabre rattling against The Sunday Times over the article by Daniel Foggo where he drew so much attention to the accuracy of the article about him.

Some may have noticed Nattrass’s denials of involvement in his company Nattrass Giles at a time when his employee (funded as an EU employee) was being found guilty, and sentenced to prison for fraud within the company in which there is every reason to believe Nattrass was embroiled and was, it is fairly reliably rumoured, fined a sum in excess of 6 figures.

That there is credibility in the rumours would seem to be endorsed by the fact that Nattrass has rehired his old employee on his EU payroll, it seems, now that his prison sentence is over – a strange action unless of course he feels indebted!

After the string of poor judgements and foolish decisions by Mike Nattrass I for one hope that he has the good grace to withdraw from the election as he seemingly has little or nothing of merit to offer and he has lost most of his long term staff who at least gave him a semblance of competence.

 

NATTRASS, Joyce 01

 

May he and Joyce enjoy a long and happy retirement as she has surely earned it!
.

 

Regards,
Greg_L-W..

 

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

 

TO LEAVE THE EU What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples – they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants. The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING. Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING towards that goal of unanimity in aim!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!
Regards,
Greg L-W.  

01594 – 528 337 

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS: ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning to Leave-The-EU for these United Kingdoms and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country & minded that membership of The EU is sucking out the life blood and identity of our Country in a counter patriotic manner and at a cost in hard cash of some £53 Million a day we must consider: Denying the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs and the no longer relevant MPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour.

Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples by the peoples of our Country.

It is time that the entire mechanism of governance in these United Kingdoms, which has so clearly failed our Country and our peoples, was radically overhauled and updated to democratic status – failure to change will mean when we Leave-The-EU and/or it finally collapses, as it surely will, we will be no better off as the self same self styled, self enriching clique will be all too willing to betray us as they have done relative to The EU and its fore runners.

 

INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel:  01594 – 528 337 
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES< Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW
.
 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU  
 

 

 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Farage Party shows it’s Ayling Racism in UKIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 15/12/2013

Farage Party shows it’s Ayling Racism in UKIPTITLE
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Farage Party shows it’s Ayling Racism in UKIP as we showed on this web site 8 days ago!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

as you will have noted in our posting last week, wewere aware that Nigel Farage’s letter was far from plausible and more than something of an over worked ‘device’:

CLICK HERE
Here is the letter Nigel Farage mailed out on the subject – he even signed it which is rare as he is disincined to leave a trail of his actions as many have found to their cost!

AYLING, Victoria 02 FARAGE LETTER re!
May I suggest that you read the Daily Mail article and view the video to make your own conclusions!

It is, as I’m sure you are aware, a very old and well tried concept to deal with exposure and any form of criticism to claim you are obviously a threat and that is why you are being exposed for your corruption, criminality or whatever.

The aim is to get the more gullible of your followers to gather around you in sympathy at just how unfair it is!!

Even Kenneth Williams caught on to this commedy routine and used it in a carry on movie:
@Infamy, infamy they’ve all got it infor me’.

National Front past of UKIP star at centre of race row… and police probe into her ‘abuse’ of transvestite husband

  • Farage stands by ‘send them back’ councillor – and she wants to be an MP
  • But now Mail on Sunday reveals Victoria Ayling was at rallies of racist NF
  • She says she went as research for a law thesis at Southampton University
  • Police are investigating ‘hate crime’ over insult to cross-dressing partner

By PAUL CAHALAN

| 


Past: UKIP councillor Victoria Ayling attended National Front rallies, according to her ex-husband

Past: UKIP councillor Victoria Ayling attended National Front rallies, according to her ex-husband

The UKIP councillor at the centre of a racism row was a member of the far-Right National Front, it was claimed last night.

Victoria Ayling, a high-profile ‘trusted ally’ of UKIP leader Nigel Farage, joined the openly racist party and attended its rallies as a student, according to her former husband, a friend and even her own mother.

A Mail on Sunday investigation has also discovered Mrs Ayling is being investigated by police after allegedly making abusive comments about her former husband – who is  a transvestite.

The revelations come a week after this newspaper unveiled video footage of Mrs Ayling saying that all immigrants to Britain should be sent back home.

Mrs Ayling, who in March defected from the Tories by ambushing David Cameron after his party conference speech, was heard saying in the video: ‘OK, I just want to send the lot back, but I can’t say that.’

Now her mother, Brenda Brooks, and a family friend claim that Mrs Ayling joined the National Front in 1977 and went to meetings above a pub in Croydon, South London.

The friend also alleges that Mrs Ayling – who is known as a ‘Farage filly’ by UKIP insiders – attended a meeting at the home of a National Front candidate who stood for a seat in the 1979 General Election.

Speaking about her daughter’s past for the first time, Mrs Brooks, an artist and property developer, said: ‘Victoria was a member of the National Front and she went to marches and rallies.

‘She didn’t hide the fact that she was going to meetings. I wasn’t sure what the National Front was, I wasn’t a political animal. She just went there and that is what she did. I’m not saying it was the Girl Guides, but I saw it as a phase, part of her growing up.’

Stephen Agar, 50, a friend of Mrs Ayling’s who attended meetings with her as a teenager, added: ‘Victoria was a card-carrying member [of the National Front].

‘She didn’t just go along, she was engaged in it in a way that I was too for a while.

‘I was 14 at the time, she would have been about 18. We used to meet at the South Croydon branch regularly. She was active and took me along. I went along with her for about two years.’

 

Last night, Mrs Ayling denied being a member or supporter of the National Front, an extremist organisation that advocates the compulsory repatriation of all ‘non-white’ immigrants.

However, she admitted attending party meetings, saying it was for research on a thesis when she was studying law at Southampton University.

A statement released by UKIP said: ‘This required her to attend meetings from both sides of the political spectrum.’ It added that Mrs Ayling decided to drop the subject after feeling threatened at National Front meetings.

Extremist: National Front members march in London in 1975. The party wants all non-white immigrants deported

Extremist: National Front members march in London in 1975. The party wants non-white immigrants deported

However, her version of events was last night challenged by her mother, Mr Agar and her ex-husband, Rob Ayling.

Mr Ayling claimed that when his soon-to-be wife was hoping to become a Conservative party  candidate in 1999, the pair concocted a ‘cover story’ after she raised fears that her National Front past would be exposed.

‘She was very worried that the fact she was a National Front member would come out,’ he added.

‘We agreed – and I shouldn’t have done – that we would concoct a cover story that she had joined as part of her research for her university degree.

Joke: UKIP leader Nigel Farage chuckles at a meeting with under-fire 'rising star' Victoria Ayling

Joke: UKIP leader Nigel Farage chuckles at a meeting with under-fire ‘rising star’ Victoria Ayling

‘But she was studying law and there was no need for her to be researching that subject. Now that she has used that cover is no surprise to me at all. She is lying.’

Mr Agar added: ‘Before she went to Southampton she was going to National Front meetings. She was attending meetings while she was doing A-levels. She never mentioned to me that she doing anything as part of her studies, she was going because she wanted to.’

Mrs Brooks, 81, also rubbished her daughter’s claims last night, saying she had made the painful decision to speak about the past for the  sake of the family. ‘Victoria never mentioned anything about university work to me,’ she said. ‘That’s not it at all.

‘She was going to the meetings because she wanted to. I’m not being vindictive. I’m only telling the facts as they have happened.

‘I’m speaking because Victoria’s behaviour has negatively affected myself and my family.

‘Victoria was very forceful with her views, saying stuff like, “Let’s keep the blacks out.”

‘I didn’t know what the National Front was – as far as I was concerned they went up there, to London, marching up and down. That’s all I knew about it.’

Mrs Brooks, who has made a signed and witnessed statement on her daughter’s past, added: ‘She  has always been politically minded, I think she enjoyed the excitement of going up there and being in the meetings and being part of it. She mentioned a rally where they did carry banners.

‘Had she got involved in fighting, fracas and cheating and stealing that would have been different, but marches and banners didn’t seem particularly worrying.’

‘I repeat, if there had been anything untoward, like fights, she wouldn’t have been allowed to go. But it was just meetings and flags.’

Mrs Ayling, 54, was elected as a UKIP Lincolnshire councillor in May and, in a fast-track rise through the party, spoke at its annual conference in September. 

Shock: The video of Mrs Ayling saying of immigrants 'OK, I just want to send the lot back, but I can't say that' was exposed by the Mail on Sunday last week. She said the comments were taken out of context

Shock: The video of Mrs Ayling saying of immigrants ‘OK, I just want to send the lot back, but I can’t say that’ was exposed by the Mail on Sunday last week. She said the comments were taken out of context

But Mrs Brooks said of her daughter’s ambition to stand in the next General Election: ‘I don’t think she should be a politician. I don’t think she’s suitable. She hasn’t got any compassion; she wants to be the top dog. No, I don’t think she’s suitable, definitely.’

Mr Agar, who was a guest at Mrs Ayling’s first two weddings and lived opposite the family in Purley, South London, also claimed that Mrs Ayling took part in National Front demonstrations. 

‘Victoria was bold, even for a teenager and she was happy to argue her point with anybody,’ he said. ‘She also went with the National Front up to Brick Lane in London.

‘I didn’t go with her but she used  to tell me the stories. One time she said she and other men got chased into a pub. She did that at least once. She was 19 or 20. She held extreme views, but whether she does now or not I don’t know. We went for National Front meetings in the Swan and Sugarloaf pub in Croydon.

 
‘Victoria was very forceful with her views, saying stuff like, “Let’s keep the blacks out”.’

– Her mother Brenda Brooks, 81

 

‘The NF hired the top room from the landlord and we had meetings about once a month. There were probably 25 to 30 people at a meeting. All white, mainly men.

‘The meetings were one a month in the top room in the pub. She was still at home and she would drive and we would listen to speeches.

‘We did that for a year or two and I remember my last meeting was at the house of a local candidate, Roland Dummer. We went to his house in 1979 for a branch meeting. There were about 20 people there. It was the day Jim Callaghan lost a vote of no confidence by one vote [on March 28, 1979, triggering the General Election] – that’s why I remember the date.’

Mr Agar also revealed how he used to collect for the National Front in the streets near his home. ‘I collected in South Croydon and leafleted in Purley,’ he said. ‘I collected jumble – we called ourselves the Industrial Archaeological Society. It was wrong, people were giving stuff for a different cause.’

Mr Agar, who quit the National Front after a few years and said he has no personal axe to grind, that he was now speaking out in the interests of truth.

The Mail on Sunday can also reveal that Mrs Ayling and her new partner, Lord Kevin Couling – who purchased his title, the 64th Lord of Little Neasden – are also being investigated by police for an alleged hate crime against Mr Ayling.

The couple split in August last year after Mr Ayling had an affair.

Mr Ayling – who admits being a transvestite – alleges that when he was moving his furniture out of the matrimonial home, his former wife shouted at him: ‘You’re a bad tranny I’ve seen your website.’

A Lincolnshire Police spokesman said: ‘On July 13, a 54-year-old female and a 51-year-old male, both living at the same address, were voluntarily interviewed in relation to section 4 of the public order act, hate crime.’  Police are understood to be analysing an audio recording of the incident.

‘I’ve no need to apologise. My ex-partner is hell-bent on destroying my life’

INTERVIEW by Angella Johnson

Victoria Ayling speaking in 2007 on immigration in a DVD presentation filmed by her then-husband Robin Ayling
Victoria Ayling speaking in 2007 on immigration in a DVD presentation filmed by her then-husband Robin Ayling
Victoria Ayling speaking in 2007 on immigration in a DVD presentation filmed by her then-husband Robin Ayling
Victoria Ayling speaking in 2007 on immigration in a DVD presentation filmed by her then-husband Robin Ayling

Forceful: Part of the 20-minute video which we revealed last week. Mrs Ayling has blamed a smear campaign

Desperately fighting for her political career after being labelled a racist, UKIP councillor Victoria Ayling now claims to be the victim of a vicious smear campaign.

A video of Mrs Ayling – revealed by The Mail on Sunday last week – clearly showed her saying she wanted to send all immigrants back home.

But even after public outrage at her comments, she continues to claim she is not a racist.

Indeed, she appears to find the allegations against her deeply repugnant.

Bolstered by the personal backing of flamboyant UKIP leader, Nigel Farage, she remains unapologetic – and increasingly defiant.

‘I have nothing to apologise for,’ she insists, her tone strident. ‘I was referring to illegal immigrants. It would be stupid and unrealistic to expect all immigrants to leave the country.

‘Many of them have made very considerable contributions to our cultural and economic life. I also accept that genuine refugees and asylum seekers should be offered a home here, no matter their race or religion.’

It might seem damning that the video that exposed her was provided by her ex-husband, music company executive Rob Ayling, who was also behind the camera.

But Mrs Ayling claims it is merely the latest incident in a bitter vendetta being waged by her ex-husband – because she refused to accept his preferred lifestyle and sued for divorce.

Ex: Mrs Ayling claimed her former husband Robin Ayling (pictured) who filmed the outburst in 2007, is orchestrating a smear campaign. She said he cheated on her with other women and wore women's clothes

Ex: Mrs Ayling claimed her former husband Robin Ayling (pictured) who filmed the outburst in 2007, is orchestrating a smear campaign. She said he cheated on her with other women and wore women’s clothes

In her first interview since the video was made public, the 54-year-old claims Mr Ayling cheated on her with other women, enjoyed wearing women’s clothes and forced her to go out with him while he was dressed as his alter ego, Rebecca Adams.

In a bid to save her third marriage, she visited nightclubs with him and says she watched as he danced and flirted with other men. At one event, he took photographs of them together and later posted them on to a website for cross-dressing and transgender men – an attempt, she claims, to discredit her.

‘I suffered two months of bullying and intimidation after I found out about his adultery and that he was a transvestite,’ she says. ‘He made me do things I didn’t want to: things that nauseated me – like going out with him dolled up as a woman.

‘At first I went along with it because I didn’t want another failed marriage. After a couple of months, however, I realised it was not for me. Although I feared he would turn against me, I asked him to leave the family home in January 2011 and filed for divorce. He fought me all the way and kept threatening to go public with details of the divorce.

Rising star: Victoria Ayling with UKIP's Nigel Farage. The party has issued statements standing by her

Rising star: Victoria Ayling with UKIP’s Nigel Farage. The party has issued statements standing by her

‘I wanted to keep it all private to protect my children. So you can imagine how devastated I was by his betrayal. Did he even bother to think about how it might impact on the son we have together? The whole thing has been like a nightmare.’

Of course, if her own shocking revelations were to cause her former spouse embarrassment, so much the better.

Flag-waving: Victoria Ayling with a Union Jack umbrella at her six-bedroom mansion in Lincolnshire

Flag-waving: Victoria Ayling with a Union Jack umbrella at her six-bedroom mansion in Lincolnshire

‘I’m only talking about this now because I want people to know what was behind his decision to make those video out-takes public,’ she insists.

‘My ex-husband is bent on destroying me. It has nothing to do with him thinking I’m a racist or a bigot. 

He was very supportive of my political campaigns and didn’t have a problem with my views when the video was made.’

We meet at Mrs Ayling’s mansion in a leafy idyll on the edge of a Lincolnshire village.

The six-bedroom property, set in five acres, with a private cinema room, a pool and even a lake was a major bone of contention in the divorce.

She now shares it with her New Zealand-born partner, Lord Kevin Couling, and her sons.

Victoria’s first marriage in 1985 was to Linton Cook, which lasted four years. She then married Desmond Bowles, with whom she had two sons. They parted after seven years.

She was still living in Surrey when in 1998 she met Mr Ayling at a party. They married in Putney, South London, in June 2000 and their only child was born a year later.

She first stood as the Tory parliamentary candidate in Great Grimsby in 2010 and came close to winning a safe Labour seat, falling short by 714 votes. She is considered to be a rising UKIP star and hopes to stand for Parliament in 2015.

‘I think my ex was relying on UKIP chucking me out,’ she says, ‘but my views are exactly the same as my party. They know everything about me because I’ve not hidden anything from them.’

Mr Ayling said last night: ‘It makes me sad that my ex wife has chosen to attack me about my personal life. It is clearly an attempt to move away from the public interest in her.

‘The worse thing is that the person this really affects is our special needs son.’

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

One has to wonder if Victoria Ayling is just along for the ride and to attack her ex husband she is clearly fulsome personally supported by Nigel Farage regardless of the best interests of UKIP in its pretence not to be a racist organisation.

Farage finds himself in an impossible position clearly unable to plausibly deny racism as a result of his chosen associates amongst the extremist xenophobes and racists in EU politics. Let us not forget that of the 18 MEPs elected by gullible UKIP voters 9 are no longer UKIP MEPs and the main cause has been Farage’s determination to link his party with extremists in the EU.

That UKIP’s best known policy is the populist and irresponsible anti immigrant policy and complete lack of a plausible exit and survival strategy relative to the EU does not help UKIP in its hollow denials of racism.

It may in some ways be fortuitous for UKIP that the BNP has collapsed but one need only watch Farage & Andrew Brons in a recent discussion to realise Farage is on weak ground with regard to denial of racism –
See: CLICK HERE and HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »