Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • January 2026
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Author Archive

Chris Pain Cleared by Police, what now for UKIP?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 10/09/2013

Chris Pain Cleared by Police, what now for UKIP?
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Chris Pain Cleared by Police of racism, what now for UKIP and particularly the centralised power of their risible claims to be Libertarian? This should leave Steve Crowther & Nigel Farage in some embarrassment at their rapid willingness to exploit the situation to suit their own ends!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

in the light of the MP3 phone recording of facts relative to UKIP leadership’s actions in blocking & barring Chris Pain, as reported on this web log, this police outcome would seem to leave UKIP leadership in some difficulty particularly Steve Crowther and his puppet master Nigel Farage.

This exacerbates the very real cause for embarrassment surrounding the rigging of selection processes!

Police to take ‘no further action’ over UKIP racism allegations

Chris Pain

Chris Pain

Lincolnshire Police say there will be ‘no further action’ taken against members of UKIP that were accused of making racist posts on the internet.

Officers have been carrying out investigations in the past few months into members of UKIP, including county leader Chris Pain.

The allegations included complaints that they posted comments, including those of a racist nature, on to social media sites, such as Facebook, and ‘caused or reinforced racial hatred’.

Coun Pain won the Wainfleet and Burgh ward at May’s Lincolnshire County Council elections and leads the UKIP opposition group. He will stand to try to become Boston and Skegness MP at the 2015 General Election.

He and Boston North councillor Tiggs Keywood-Wainwright were accused by campaign group Hope Not Hate of posting ‘racist rants’.

Although the investigation largely centred on alleged posts made by Coun Pain, The Standard understands material from Coun Keywood-Wainwright – who won a by-election in Fenside last week – was also looked at.

A senior detective has reviewed the evidence and decided that no further action will be taken by police against either Mr Pain or the other UKIP members accused.

A spokesman said: “Lincolnshire Police take all allegations of hate crime extremely seriously and, where appropriate, will refer these matters to the Crown Prosecution Service, who, in our experience, take an equally serious stance.

“Police are reliant on there being a sufficient amount of evidence, of a quality which would support a decision to prosecute anyone suspected of carrying out crimes of this nature.

“When dealing with internet based activity there has to be an audit trail which enables us to prove the person who is suspected of displaying information on the Web is actually the person pressing the computer keys.

“There are many factors which make such an investigation very complex. Officers must work with the powers granted under specific legislation and, where the servers and the administration of the sites falls outside the United Kingdom, the police and other enforcement agencies are often unable to obtain the relevant information needed to prove who placed comments or information on one of the sites. This is particularly the case with the main social media sites, such as Twitter and Facebook.

“In the world of increasingly technical equipment and expertise, it is always possible for false profiles to be created and information to be posted on a user’s account without their knowledge.

“In such cases, it is very difficult for police to trace the origins of the information and to be sufficiently certaint that the person alleged to be displaying some comment or information actually did so.”

Lincolnshire Police DI Andy Wardell said: “This problem is exacerbated when the social network account is closed by an individual who has either become aware or is directly made aware by someone that comments have been seen and the informant is going to contact the police.

“Fictional police and CSI shows often depict investigations where information in cyber space can be traced instantly but the reality is very different.

“Therefore, if any person discovers information displayed or comments posted to social networking sites which they feel are racist ,or made with the intent of stirring up racism, they should inform the police immediately and not post responses or enter into dialect with the individual believed to have made such racist comments.

“Doing so will inevitably result in the comments being removed and the account closed making it impossible to achieve a satisfactory result with any investigation.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

In UKIP Sked was Out ManEUvered by Farage BUT

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 08/09/2013

In UKIP Sked was Out ManEUvered by Farage BUT …
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

In UKIP Prof. Alan Sked was Out ManEUvered by Nigel Farage BUT! There are many such ‘buts’ such as but he has been bitter about it ever since, but his interventions since have been self serving ego trips and destructive nihilism, but Farage may be devious and underhand as a rival but he is no leader, merely a performer!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

the bitter inadequacy of Alan Sked may well be understandable but no one shows more clearly the old adage of ‘All political careers end in failure’.

Having lost control of the party he founded he has spent since 1997 trying to destroy it when others, like myself who support his founding principle of Leave-The-EU and are thus supporters of UKIP, have relentlessly endeavoured to support UKIP by seeking to clean it up, erradicate the corruption and centralisation of power and authority in one man and his claque and make the party fit for purpose.

That it is clear that since defeating Alan Sked Nigel Farage has centralised control and excercised it himself is meerely indicative that he was the stronger individual whether with or without integrity!

Just as Alan Skedd endeavoured to dictate and manipulate the party to fit his ambitions so also has Nigel Farage since he seized control, following on in the same mold as Alan Akedd, his intellectual mentor and rival for 4 years!

UKIP, by dropping itys standards and encouraging populism over responsibility, popularity as a substitute for leadership has taken advantage of the demise of the BNP and swelled its membership and supporters but has ensured its eventual demise by rejecting gravitas and detailed intellectual persuit of the goal to Leave-The-EU bowing to the small minded pressure of forming, or at least trying to form, policies in areas where it has no sign of competence or credibility.

UKIP has consigned itself to being little more than the dustbin into which protest votes are consigned – hence the success in EU elections, seen as irrelevant by the electorate at large, and its abject failure in domestic poluitics where it is no closer, in real terms, to having an MP elected and has a mere 140 councillors and almost 1,700 failure who stood for office and failed – as in all competition who came second or 22nd. is of no interest a week after the election!

Clearly the UKIP of Alan Skedd did not succeed, largely because it was too rigidly controlled to suit the views and beliefs of Alan Sked – Just as UKIP has failed to make the grade under Nigel Farage’s leadership, albeit a defacto leadership of Farage when he was not the stated leader!

Sked’s aim to launch a new party is little more than an act of ego and he clearly has little or no understanding of the fears of ‘the common man’ when confronted with rapid social changes whish as so often have bred rezsentment, whether rational or not.

It is indisputable that UKIP under Farage’s leadership due to its attempts at growth through populism and its association with the extremists in the EU within the undeniably racist, extremist, anti homosexual and xenophobic EFD Group numerous of whom have criminal convictions for their extreme views and prejudices.

There is no doubt that immigration should face some form of intelligent control, not on racial grounds but on both need and capacity to absorbe the alien influx.

Skedd has missed the point and Farage has overstated it giving solace to the corrupt, the racists and the small minded amongst his party’s members and voters!

Sked stands less chance of winning a seat in Doncaster against the odious Ed Miliband, as an MP, than Farage did in Buckingham against John Bercow, where he was soundly drubbed!

It is also debatable whether Sked was speaking of himself when he said:
These are the tired and false representations of a disappointed man.’
Probably not or he forgot to mention ego and embittered revenge for his failure in 1997!

I believe Sked’s claim that he left UKIP as it had become too racist is fundamentally untrue and a convenient cover invented long after the event which led to his departure ‘he lost control of the party he foumnded to Nigel Farage whose manipulative skills and devious charm as a performer outstripped his own overly academic rigidity based on the Sked ego as a ‘teacher’ where he proved incompetent in the adult world of back stabbing and greed!

‘I left UKIP because it has become too racist,’ says party’s founder

  • Professor Alan Sked, 66, says New Deal can challenge major parties
  • Believes most of the country are against the EU but UKIP is ‘too extreme’
  • New organisation would be tolerant of minorities and support immigration
  • He founded the party now ran by Farage in 1993

By Wills Robinson

|

 

The founder of UKIP has set up a new Eurcosceptic organisation for those who feel his old party have become ‘racist’.

Professor Alan Sked, 66, hopes the centre-left party, called New Deal, is a step away from the set-up under Nigel Farage, which he believes has become ‘anti-immigrant and ‘anti-intellectual.’

He also hopes to challenge the Labour Party and has considered opposing Ed Miliband in his Doncaster seat at the 2015 General Election.

New direction: Professor Alan Sked in 1993 when he launched The UK Independence Party.

New direction: Professor Alan Sked in 1993 when he launched The UK Independence Party.

Some of the policies the organisation will push include the rationalisation of railways and the scrapping of the bedroom tax.

He also believes many voters in Britain want to leave with the EU, but will not side with UKIP because they are too extreme.

His criticism of Farage’s party began after a number of council candidates were exposed for having extreme right-wing links or homophobic views.

The new party could pose significant threat to Labour as leader Ed Miliband faces increasing criticism for weak leadership and being vague on policy.

There are also plans for a candidate to stand against deputy prime minister Nick Clegg in his Sheffield constituency.

Competition: Professor Alan Sked thinks UKIP have become too 'racist' under the leadership of Nigel Farage (left) and says he will stand against Ed Miliband in his Doncaster seat
Competition: Professor Alan Sked thinks UKIP have become too 'racist' under the leadership of Nigel Farage (left) and says he will stand against Ed Miliband in his Doncaster seat

Competition: Professor Alan Sked thinks UKIP have become too ‘racist’ under the leadership of Nigel Farage (left) and has considered standing against Ed Miliband in his Doncaster seat at the next General Election

Sked, a lecturer in international history at the London School of Economics, told The Sunday Times he wanted a party dedicated to leaving the EU but was not too right wing.

‘I think the majority of the people in this country want out of the EU,’ said Sked.

‘They would like a party devoted to the cause, but couldn’t vote for one that was extremely right wing.

‘They will now be given a serious alternative to the major parties and UKIP.’

Despite plans from David Cameron to renegotiate the terms of Britain’s membership of the EU, Sked believes the Conservative leader is ‘trying to pull the wool over the eyes’ of the country and his party.

The name New Deal is based on policies introduced in the United States by President Franklin D Roosevelt in the 1930’s to lift America out of the Great Depression.

The party’s draft manifesto states tolerance for minorities and is supportive of immigration which it believes is ‘fundamental to the growth of an economically prosperous and civilised society’.

Other new deal policies will include the ending of welfare payments for those earning more than £100,000 a year, oppose the privatisation of Royal Mail and scrap the government’s controversial high-speed rail plans.

It was officially registered as a party last week by the Electoral Commission and intends to field candidates at the 2015 General Election.

But, in contrast to UKIP, it will not be standing in European elections because Sked believed it would be ‘hypocritical’.

Sked pointed out that when he founded UKIP, it had very limited financial resources and is ready to raise funds to help boost the new party.

His first involvement in politics was with the Liberal Party in Scotland but later rejected their pro-European stance.

In 1993 he stood in two by-elections, one in Newbury where he was supported by Enoch Powell.

He came fourth behind the major parties in both elections which prompted the Anti Federalist League (AFL) to change its name to UKIP.

Last month Godfrey Bloom, UKIP MEP for Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire, provoked outrage after referring to countries in Africa which received aid from Briatin ‘Bongo Bongo land’.

Sked added: ‘These are the tired and false representations of a disappointed man.’

The party, which has been led by Farage since 2010, denies being racist or anti-immigrant.

A spokesman for the party said: ‘Alan should be pleased with how well we are doing and the successes of the party he created.’

To view the original article CLICK HERE

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ukip With Some Consistency Chooses Liabilities Rather Than Assetts

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 05/09/2013

Ukip With Some Consistency Chooses Liabilities Rather Than Assetts
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Ukip With Some Consistency Chooses Liabilities Rather Than Assetts, which regularly hands a gift to their critics and opponents.
It clearly takes a skill Nigel Farage & his cronies have mastered!

000a ukip-025 count.png

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
it would take ability to so regularly ensure that the calibre of an organisation was as consistently gutter quality – but whether it is the calibre of their MEPs, EUPPCs, Westminster PPCs, Councillors or wanabe Councillors, general staff or management staff they seem repeatedly to be more a liability than an assett.

UKIP Press Officer

Alexanda Phillips In The European Parliament

Alexanda Phillips In The European Parliament

& her Offensive Comments!

posted by: Simon Cressy | on: Thursday, 5 September 2013, 09:28


Alexandra Phillips

Alexandra Phillips

There is a well known saying that claims there is no such thing as bad publicity.

UKIP have had their fair share of publicity this year, most of it being bad with countless indiscretions and gaffes being revealed in the national media on a daily basis.

It seems the busiest people in UKIP at the moment are their national press officers who have the unenviable task of having to deal with the nations media following yet another howler by one of the party’s officials.

With their heavy workload in mind I found it a little surprising that one of their own press officers had been busy making countless indiscretions of their own.

Alexandra Phillips describes herself as Head of Media for Nigel Farage and UKIP on her Linkedin profile, she has also recently been described as UKIP’s Head Of Press in an article by Channel 4 journalist Cathy Newman.

The 29 year old has previously worked for both the BBC and ITV along with a series of international newspapers and claims she was headhunted for the role with UKIP. Phillips also describes herself as a spin doctor and speechwriter, on her personal website she includes excerpts of speeches she has written for The European Parliament.

Alexandra Phillips is a frequent visitor to The European Parliament in Brussels where she works alongside UKIP’s 11 MEP’s. So when we checked her personal Facebook profile we were amazed at some of the offensive postings she has made over a number of years.

She frequently mocks the disabled, often referring to herself or others as “Spaz” or “Spasticated” Words that have thankfully dropped out of common usage as the majority of British society regard them as offensive. Phillips also refers to an online friend of hers as an “Autistic wanker”.

Another posting she claims that “She is hungrier than a Biafran” a disgusting reference to the huge numbers of people who starved to death during the Nigerian–Biafran War in the 1960’s.

Another posting by the young press officer claims that she “Is bored of being Anne Frank” a sick link to the tragic tale of the young Dutch girl who hid from the Nazis in World War 2 and was ultimately captured and died in Bergen-Belsen concentration camp.

If she wanted to know about Nazis maybe Alexandra Phillips could have asked Jean- Marie Le Pen, MEP and then leader of the Front National. In November 2009 she wrote” Is in the European Parliament and that charming Frenchman Jean-Marie Le Pen is in the office down the corridor. Maybe I should go and say hello”.

It seems that when she visits the European Parliament she gives some of our continental cousins a wide berth, It appears she isn’t keen on people from The Netherlands as she writes” Dutch people should come with a health warning.”

She isn’t that keen on the British either writing “English boys are shit” and “Sometimes just reading the papers and waking up in the UK is enough to make you feel suicidal by lunchtime”.

Let’s see how the self appointed UKIP “Spin Doctor” spins this mess.

Alexanda Phillips In The European Parliament

Alexanda Phillips In The European Parliament

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE
.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.

Posted in EU, EUkip, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

UKIP Will Do ANYTHING for Publicity It Seems!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/09/2013

UKIP Will Do ANYTHING for Publicity It Seems!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

UKIP Will Do ANYTHING for Publicity It Seems! They may get publicity but clearly get used in return as they offer a home to ANYONE regardless of the reasons!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

all too often one hears from the low lifes who pose as spokesmen for UKIP that there is no such thing as bad publicity – one notes how often these spokespeople hide their unpleasant and ill informed self seeking stupidity behind anonymity with false names and lies!

Lord Beaverbrook as a multi Millionaire press baron may well have been in a position to believe his comment but the amount of bad publicity UKIP gets is repeatedly showing them for what they are – a self serving clique seeking enrichment and status and as so often happens with dishonest people seeking their own gains they get demeaned and used!

UKIP has sadly failed on almost every count in domestic politics and seems to have only acted as a magnet for those seeking their own glory and as a dustbin in which to place protest votes.

Yes UKIP membership has finally  regained that which they achieved back in the days of Roger Knapmann’s leadership Steve Harrand even that was based on the lies and false promises made by Nigel Farage to dupe Robert Kilroy Silkn into membership which gained huge publicity and a downgrading of the standards  of its membership.

Let us not forget that Boys Own as a mere pop group had the same number of paid up fans as UKIP has members –

The lack of professionalism and the obvious determination of its star performer to drive anyone who might be a challenge to him out of the party and surround himself with low grade over paid ingrates is all too clear!

With endless poor publicity and incompetent leadership UKIP is going nowhere and after 20 years they still have no coherent strategy, no visible tactics, no clear plan and have still failed to present a viable UK exit and survival strategy when it comes to The EU.

UKIP will never be of consequence until it makes good the shortfall and professionalises rather than organising a revolving door of people joining the party in the hope of professionalising it and quitting in yet another series of bad publicity when they realise just how corrupt, how racist and how self serving are its leadership and its odious cronies.

UKIP pair undecided about their future

POLITICAL CHANGE ... South Tyneside councillors Steve Harrison, Linda Hemmer and George Elsom when they defected to UKIP with, from back left, regional UKIP Richard Elvin and deputer leader Paul Nuttall.

POLITICAL CHANGE … South Tyneside councillors Steve Harrison, Linda Hemmer and George Elsom when they defected to UKIP with, from back left, regional UKIP Richard Elvin and deputer leader Paul Nuttall.

Coun George Elsom, official opposition leader on South Tyneside Council, last week announced he was leaving UKIP, which he only joined this summer in order to smash Labour’s political power stranglehold in the borough.

Now Steve Harrison and Linda Hemmer have revealed they have not made their minds up about standing for UKIP – or any other political party – at local elections in 2014 and 2015.

Although still “committed” to supporting UKIP, which they joined at the start of June, both say they are still considering their future political options.

And both councillors, who represent the Fellgate and Hedworth ward in Jarrow, say they “understand” the reasons Coun Elsom quit UKIP.

Coun Harrison said: “George dipped his toe in the water and decided that he didn’t like aspects of UKIP, and Linda and I respect that.

“But we joined UKIP because we were able to maintain our political independence and because there is no whip on local councillors with the party, as there is with Labour.

“Linda and I still consider ourselves independents. It’s always been about serving the local people in our ward, never about party politics.

“We can call on the power of UKIP on bigger issues, but there has never been any interference from the party at local level.”

Coun Harrison was a Labour Party member for 12 years, but quit in 2003, after becoming “disillusioned” with the party.

Pressed to say if he will stand as a UKIP candidate in South Tyneside next year, Coun Harrison said: “I would have to go through the proper selection process and it hasn’t got to that stage yet.

“It’s not simply that I haven’t decided I won’t stand for UKIP, but that I haven’t decided I will stand for re-election at all.”

But both councillors are still backing UKIP, which will hold a recruitment meeting at the Little Haven Hotel, in River Drive, South Shields, at 7pm on Tuesday.

Coun Hemmer said: “I haven’t decided if I’m even standing for election in two years’ time.

“Being a councillor is a difficult role and I cannot say what the future holds.

“I understand George’s reasons for leaving UKIP and respect those reasons, but all three of us will still work together as independent councillors.

“Steve and I are still independent councillors, but operating under the umbrella of UKIP.

“But as I’ve said before, I don’t do party politics – I do people – and UKIP puts no party whip on us.

“I left Labour because I was disgusted with the party and remain disgusted over issues such as the closure of Queens Road Day Centre in Jarrow.

“But I don’t know if I’m standing as a candidate for any party in 2015.”

Coun Elsom, who represents the Cleadon Park ward, in South Shields, denied that joining UKIP was “a mistake”.

He said he quit because he did not believe membership would help bolster the political opposition in the borough, for the greater good of the people of South Tyneside.

To view the original article CLICK HERE.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

UKIP Needs A Bigger Sack For Its Squabbling Ferrets!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 03/09/2013

UKIP Needs A Bigger Sack For Its Squabbling Ferrets!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

UKIP Needs A Bigger Sack For Its Squabbling Ferrets! Thgis time it is the then CEO of UKIP who shows his contempt for the infighting and self promotion within UKIP and Chris Pain rernouncing the corruption in the party!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}

From: Greg Lance-Watkins (Greg_L-W)

At: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Hi,

You may be interested in the eMail below and the relevant attachments.

So that I keep lines of communication open please acknowledge source as

http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

If you choose to use it or forward it.

 

It will be on my web site later today, when I have time.

Do note that I have a copy of the MP3, which is very clear and as per the transcription I have supplied – sorry my tecNoSkills are not up to posting a copy on this web site and as it may aid in disclosing my sources I have made no effort to upload the item.

ALSO you will be amused to note that I reminded people that today was UKIP’s 20th. Anniversary of foundation in 1993, earlier this morning.

I get the impression it was a good thing I did as it seems to have reminded UKIP, who published the fact at about 15:40hrs.!

Thanks.

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

PS. Sorry about the delay in posting this but at 14:30hrs. today my Aunt died, so I have been a little preoccupied!

G.L-W.

http://GregLanceWatkins.com

http://GregLanceWatkins.com/my-other-blogs-etc

http://GregLW.com

http://GL-W.com

http://GLWdocuments.wordpress.com

 

http://Leave-The-EU.org.uk

http://HollieGreigetc.wordpress.com

http://ChristopherStory.org 

http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

TWITTER: @Greg_LW

Skype: gregl-w

 

PLEASE NOTE:
I never post anonymously on the internet.

For details on accuracy please see:

https://ukip-vs-eukip.com/ensuring-accuracy-the-truth

 


Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:36:12 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Conversation re Steve Crowther’s actions to take Cllr chris Pain out of UKIP

 

The conversation attached below, is between ex UKIP CEO Will Gilpin and Chris Pain, re Steve Crowther’s actions to take hard working, long standing, UKIP activist Cllr Chris Pain out of UKIP.

This relates to late 2012 / 2013, before any of the fake face book posts were posted late May and raises the issue of the total handling of the situation by UKIP. The full conversation would have a serious effect on UKIP and this is not the intention, so the parts are only attached that have a direct impact on the handling of Chris Pain.

 

 

This raises the issue that Chris Pain has not been handled fairly by the party.

 

 

Questions were asked re the issue that Steve Crowther had apparently picked the final MEP lists, rather than them being selected as a result of merit on the selection process.

 

 

This has been highlighted by Doug Denny, who has been thrown off the NEC, because he was trying to correct what he believes to be a floored (sic) process.

 

 

The response was that the only way of challenging the process, was via the courts and not through the party or the NEC.

 

 

This is not democratic or fair as stated in the UKIP constitution in how we should act as a party.

 

 

The main problem is the defamation of character against Chris Pain, which has not been addressed.

 

 

Apologies for the rough transcript, but it was done from 2am until 5am in the morning.

 

 

Written Words of Recording Re Telephone Conversation with Will Gilpin

Chris Can I ask you a straight question which is involving me, yes, did Steve Crowther have any involvement, on my side, when it came in front of the NEC.

Will   When it came to your three months suspension?

ChrisNo No before that.

Will   What did you mean

Chris Did Steve have any conversations with you or separately

Will   I’ll give you the honest answer I can’t remember the details, but I was well aware that Steve had lots of antipathy towards you, and made it very clear he would like to get you out of the party, and would do whatever he could to achieve that.

Chris that ties in with what somebody else has said.

Will Okay yes

Chris Somebody else quite high up has said exactly the same

Will   Yes, when you arranged your conference and invited me and Kate to speak at it or me to speak at it and I turned you down, because Steve gave me a direct order, that I wasn’t to attend or have anything to do with you, and giving that he was paying my pay cheque I went along with it.

Chris That’s obvious and unbelievable

Will   Just because his argument to me was that the conference was project designed to get you elected, and he didn’t want to get you elected,  we had to do our best not to support it.

Chris That explains on my lead through Lisa and everybody cancelled on the Sunday as well, because they cancelled on the Sunday and we were doing the Sunday training for people and they cancelled, they got the same…

Will   I imagine so I am not aware, but I am sure Steve I didn’t really know him that well, but I had done a couple of bits with him and I liked him, and because he thought that I liked him he could get me to do what he wanted. You know, it has taken me quite a while to realise that, I still haven’t quite figured him out

Chris But to be honest with you how can I say it

Will   I know he doesn’t like Nigel, but on the other hand this is his carer isn’t it

Chris You say he doesn’t like Nigel but

Will   He doesn’t like him, But he knows Nigel is his paymaster, his gravy train

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

ChrisMore than understanding it he kept going on the same tact that it didn’t matter that they weren’t on your site. I said well of course it does because that’s what people think it is on my facebook site

Will   yeh yeh yeh you were dammed if you did and dammed if you didn’t in fact weren’t you cos if you had admitted they were on your site he would have had you for that, and if you said they weren’t he would have accused you of lying, so

ChrisBut the downside is he knows the fact they weren’t there, he knew they weren’t there afterwards, I actually gave him the proof and sent it to him directly and showed him where they were, and I didn’t get that until the I approached the news editor who sent it through to me. I didn’t know what open part, because I’d been told by somebody else he was using it to take me purposely out of the MEP position, and take me out of the party, which coincides with what you said

Will   Yes I know that is something he wanted to do, I can’t tell you is there was any specific plan, other than he just saw this opportunity and thought, it looked good, you know

Chrishow long  .. has he ever said why he wanted me out of the party? Has he ever drop that reason out or, is it down to Nigel or what,

Will   yes probably down to Nigel probably because you are pushy and Nigel doesn’t like anyone pushy, that might go for the leadership at some point

Christhat’s ridiculous

…………………………………………………………………………………

Will   Steve and Nigel think you are getting too big for your boots, building a power base for yourself, they only want one power base in the party, in other parties there would be lots of power basis

………………………………………………………………………………….

Will   Steve saw his opportunity he got me to get somebody to have a look at your site and obviously it was their report that was read out, you  know, I am not going to tell you who they are obviously because they are still in the party, I don’t think they particularly had a part dropping, they were just doing what they were told

Chris obviously portrayed it in a way, just by him getting you to say all the stuff had been deleted,

Will   yes

Chriswhen he knew the fact that it wasn’t on there in the first place

Will   yes yes

ChrisAlthough is sounds damming in front of the NEC, and in front of disciplinary proceedings he wouldn’t have got away with that, I would have had witnesses and evidence and gone through it bit by bit.

Will   Yes

Chris  it was like everything he threw at me at that meeting, from about the rally in Boston, which he knew about, which had been passed by Paul, and the motion that he told me to do exactly what I did do, and he knows he told me exactly what to do and Piers said the same and to throw all these things in, it was obviously bazaar, I should have had a disciplinary action where I would have got seven days notice where I could have took each bits of evidence in with me, to go through them

Will   which is what Piers said isn’t it

Chris obviously he didn’t want that, because he thought he could con people as a full NEC and twist the facts marginally enough to hit me with other stuff to get it passed

……………………………………………………………………………………

Will   it was gerimanded

Chriswithout a doubt

Will   why they excluded me from the process of course

Chris  yes the thing is it is quite obvious, Steve has done it from day 1 the whole process, pushed it rammed it through, made sure he was showing the subcommittee no minutes from the subcommittee tour at all, which to be fair is not unprofessional it is crooked

Will   yes

Chris  and then actually pushed it forward even further to leave selectors where people are, without the NEC passing a mandate about how people should be  point  scored    and these always through

Will   it’s a win win, either we’re sent the list they’ve given or we reject the entire process at which point Nigel operates the list,

Chris  it would probably be a bit fairer

Will   at lease its know

Chris  I look at what they have done so far, although I don’t agree with that, at least it would save a lot of people time energy and effort in the party

Will   and money

Chrisand money, and a lease it would be straight forward and say that’s Nigels choice and that’s it

Will   yeh yes

Chris  all Steve’s done is pushed it through regardless

Will   well that was the final straw for  me in terms of my enthusiasm for the  post

Chris what you doing now then

Will   nothing I am on holiday for a week and then gonna start working out what to do.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Ferrets in The UKIP Sack Nattrass, Pain etc.

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 31/08/2013

The Ferrets in The UKIP Sack Nattrass, Pain etc.T
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

The Ferrets in The UKIP Sack, or at least squabbling for preferment, Mike Nattrass, Chris Pain etc.!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
my only reservation with this all but standard UKIP style correspondence is the percentage which is supposedly anonymous.Like most honourable individuals I yhave little but contempt for people too ashamed of their actions to put their names to it!

—–Original Message—–
From: mike nattrass <mikenattrass@hotmail.com>
Sent: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:09
Subject: FW: Emailing: STAND UP AND BE COUNTED – RE BAD UKIP MEP SELECTIONS

This is being passed round in the East Midlands.

They are now going nuts in EAST MIDLANDS because they think the MEP LIST IS
A PROCESS RIGGED FROM TOP TO BOTTOM BY TWO PEOPLE nominated by Farage.

Open the attachment.

Mike


Subject: Fwd: Emailing: STAND UP AND BE COUNTED – RE BAD UKIP MEP SELECTIONS
From: chris.ukip@btinternet.com
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 23:27:23 +0100

I have just had this email sent over to me from Derbyshire. It is apparently doing the rounds in the East Mids.

Regards,

Chris

I am totally shocked that my two local UKIP members from Derbyshire David Gale one of the best police commissioner results for UKIP, and Phillip Rose secretary of the east midlands counties committee, have not made the list to be voted on for the MEP selections.  as these are two hard working local activists, the fact that they have not made the final cut is dubious to say the least.

 

Several of the areas are being represented in the MEP selection process by people they do not want. All our candidates have come from two counties so we have no representation from Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Lincolnshire, Rutland.  This will impact on our vote at the ballot box. The down side of this is that instead of having four MEP’s in the next elections, we will probably only have one. It has been apparent that the list has been picked by Steve Crowther, Party Chairman, raising doubts about his suitability as future chairman of the party.

 

In the east midlands these are the candidates we have been given are as follows:-

 

Barry Mahoney ~ this man has never done anything in or for the region in the last eight years. He did not campaign in the last European election at all, and was not re voted onto the east midlands committee because of his lack of attendance at meetings.

 

Roger Helmer ~ came over from the conservatives, supposed to be retiring through ill health.  He has not been to an East Midlands regional meeting yet even though he has been in the party a year and a half.  He has not contributed financially to the region either.

 

Margot Parker ~ stood against UKIP at the last European elections. She stood in Corby in the by-election which is a plus point for her.  Unfortunately she did not bother to stand for UKIP in a previous council by-election a few months before leaving the seat uncontested.  She also left the general election seat uncontested at the last general elections. Her profession is advising people how to get around EU law, so if she obtains the post of MEP we will be adding to her job CV and she will not be inclined to push forward for the UK to leave the EU.

 

Jonathan Bullock ~ has only been in the party 9 months, he should not be eligible to stand as the criteria is you have to be in the party 12 months.

 

Nigel Wickens ~ nobody knows who Nigel Wickens is.

 

The above does not make good reading for anybody in the party that wants to move forward. I thought the national selection process was a good idea and although, I was not in UKIP during the last European elections these results seem to suggest that the regions selection process was a far better process last time. The fact that concludes my thoughts is that Lincolnshire activist, Christopher Pain, has not made the list.  He has worked hard for the party for years attained the positions of Branch Chairman, Counties Chairman, East Midlands Chairman, NEC member, County Councillor, organised conferences and had some of the best election results for the party.

 

We then have to look at Mike Nattrass MEP being told he was not worthy for selection in the West Midlands makes a mockery of the all system. He has been one of the most hard working MEP’s, after Nigel Farage, in the whole party.  He has worked tirelessly and donating hundreds of thousands of pounds to the party.

 

Neil Hamilton has been deemed unworthy to stand for selection in the South West, but his silence has been bought by a high luxury job in the party.

 

All three of the following are not in the top 10, but 6 people who are not known in the area are above them, why?

 

In the south east Steve Harris their regional organiser was number 3 candidate on the last MEP list.

 

Andrew Montclies ex NEC member and policy writer for UKIP

 

Piers Wauchop NEC member long standing with 8 years plus as a County Councillor, a hard working kingpin in the south east.

 

In London Paul Oakley is top of the list an unknown character not been a hard working activist for UKIP, yet he has been deemed to be a higher calibre than MEP Gerard Batten.

 

Then we look slightly further afield Jonathan Arnott has been placed number 1 on the list in the North East.  This has dismayed local activists as they have never seen Jonathan Arnott in the region at all, people do not know who he is.

 

David Coburn has been placed number 1 in Scotland the information coming from Scotland is that he has not been there for 30 plus years.

 

These are just a few examples of the bazaar selection process that appears to be riddled with corruption from UKIP.

 

I joined UKIP because I thought they were the party of the people and as an activist I am absolutely distraught at the way many good candidates across the country have been treated and bypassed.

 

I am enclosing the email addresses of all the NEC members and if you agree that the selection of candidates is wrong, please email them and tell them.  If not I am sorry for bothering you, but a big injustice has been done here by our leaders, they are telling you who they want on the selection vote as MEP, not who we want.  What will happen at the next general election if we don’t stand up now and be counted?

 

Fellow activists and I have decided that if this injustice is not addressed we will not be actively campaigning or donating to the European elections at all.  I believed UKIP to be a democratic party yet it appears we are taking on the habits of the EU which I despise strongly

 

Alan Bown  alanbown@btinternet.com

Bours Loise  louisebours@yahoo.co.uk

Chris Pain   chris.ukip@btinternet.com

David Coburn   ClanCoburn@hotmail.co.uk

George Curtis  gscurtis@aspects.net

Gerard Batten  gerard.batten@btinternet.com

Godfrey Bloom  gbloom@ukip.org

Hugh Williams  ughmwilliams@tiscali.co.uk

Jonathan Arnott  vote.jonathan@googlemail.com

Michael Greaves  michael.greaves@gmail.com

Michael Mcgough  michael.mcgough@lineone.net

Neil Hamilton   neilhamilton49@rocketmail.com

Paul Nuttall   ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk

Piers Wauchop  wauchope@hotmail.co.uk

Rod Peers   mepselection@ukip.org

S. J. Crowther  sjcrowther@btinternet.com

Sebastian Fairweather   sebastian.fairweather@ccc.ox.ac.uk

Steven Woolfe  steven.woolfe@ukip.org

Stuart Wheeler  stuartwheeler@chilham-castle.co.uk

 

Regards

A Once Dedicated UKIP Activist

Clearly too gutless to validate their poison pen with the addition of their name, though it seems all too clear who the dweeb who authored this is!Since virtually all appointments within UKIP are orchestrated by one man, internal selections and elections have regularly been rigged and fiddled it is interesrting to note that people like Mike Nattrass who was a main mover in the corruption only speak out when they personally fall foul of the system they helped set up and support!

It does give a measure of the caliber of the trash that form the bulk of UKIP’s hierarchy. Clearly without honour, integrity or basic decency just as with the low lifes who turn a blind eye to the corruption when it works for their gain like Andrew Smith, Gerard Batten, Mick McGough and the anonymised cowards with their lies and unpleasant efforts to defame true supporters of UKIP who seek to clean it up to make it fit for purpose ratheer than fit for personal gain!

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Mike Nattrass vs. UKIP – Judgement 28-Aug-2013

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 28/08/2013

Mike Nattrass vs. UKIP – Judgement 28-Aug-2013
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Mike Nattrass vs. UKIP – Judgement 28-Aug-2013!
A TOTALLY pointless waste of between £10 & 20K with a predictable & inevitable outcome!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 3017 (Ch)
No. 3BM30448

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
CHANCERY DIVISION
BIRMINGHAM DISTRICT REGISTRY

 

Birmingham Civil Justice Centre
28th August 2013

B e f o r e :

HIS HONOUR JUDGE PURLE QC
____________________

#905* - EUkip's Mike NATTRASS FINALLY CLEARED BY OLAF

MICHAEL NATTRASS Claimant
– and –
UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY Defendant

____________________

Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO
Official Shorthand Writers and Tape Transcribers
Quality House, Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP
Tel:  020 7831 5627  Fax: 020 7831 7737
info@beverleynunnery.com

____________________ MR. STEPHEN EYRE (of counsel) instructed by the Wilkes Partnership appeared on behalf of the Claimant.
PROF. MARK WATSON-GANDY (of counsel) instructed by Griffin Law appeared on behalf of the Defendant.

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

JUDGE PURLE QC:

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-GB
X-NONE
X-NONE

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;}

·  In this application Mr. Michael Nattrass seeks an injunction against the United Kingdom Independence Party until trial in the following terms: “The defendant is strictly enjoined and restrained whether by itself its servants or agents or otherwise howsoever from conducting or purporting to conduct a ballot of the membership of the United Kingdom Independence Party with a view to selecting candidates for the election to the European Parliament to be held in June 2014”.

·  I shall refer to the Defendant as UKIP.

·  Mr Nattrass has been a West Midlands UKIP MEP since 2004. The next election will be in 2014. The candidates for the elections will be selected by a national UKIP ballot from amongst those selected for the purpose (60 in number) by a body called the National Selection Panel.

·  A selection process has been gone through which Mr. Eyre, who appears for Mr. Nattrass, has eloquently submitted is legally flawed. Mr. Nattrass was not one of the 60 people who came successfully through the selection process. Approximately 200 people applied, each paying £500 for the privilege, so there are at least 140 disappointed candidates. There are, however, 60 people who would no doubt claim to have been properly selected. Those 60 people prima facie have a contractual right to proceed to the ballot stage, which is a ballot of the entire party. If I granted the injunction that is sought, their apparent contractual rights would be infringed, yet none of them is before the court. It seems to me that that gives Mr. Eyre a real difficulty. However, that is not his only difficulty.

·  The flaws that he relies upon (or did rely upon) were 2-fold. The first was the relatively technical one that no formal resolution constituting the National Selection Panel, as required by the rules, was put to the National Executive Committee. That, however, has been effectively cured, as Mr. Eyre concedes, by a resolution of 18th August 2013 ratifying everything previously done, passed before this claim was brought, with only 1 vote against. Accordingly, Mr. Eyre now limits his legal attack before me to the second ground pleaded which is that there is, he says, an implied term in the rule book that the assessment of potential candidates for elections to the European Parliament would be conducted

(a) fairly, as between the potential candidates,

(b) by reference to objective criteria;

(c) in such a manner that each potential candidate would in interview be given an opportunity to address issues which might materially influence the assessment of his suitability for election;

(d) in such a manner that the criteria were applied and the assessment conducted in the same manner in respect of each potential candidate.

·  It is said that the implication is necessary in order to give business efficacy to the arrangements for the selection of candidates or on the ground of obviousness.

·  The details of the selection process are set out in the rule book, which is itself referred to in the defendant’s constitution and is the governing document for the selection of candidates. Moreover, the rule book was sent to all candidates and entry into the process was deemed to be acceptance of the rules.

·  The rules are very detailed. I turn in particular to section T4 which deals with the National Selection Panel which is to be appointed from among senior party members and chaired by the party chairman. That selection panel is enjoined to appoint three-person Assessment Panels to undertake the assessment and interview process within a prescribed timetable. There are detailed conditions as to how they are to operate. In particular, they are to engage the services of an independent third party recruitment company to assist with the assessment phase and assessment is to include, but not be limited to, various components such as loyalty indicators. It is further provided that candidates should make themselves available for interviews and public speaking tests on dates to be determined. There is a discretion on the National Selection Panel’s part to provide for alternative arrangements in exceptional cases and there are detailed provisions to assist the assessment process such as the organisation of public speaking events. 60 candidates in England are to be chosen. Only those candidates go forward to the ballot stage.

·  Those very detailed provisions, which I have merely summarised, but which cover several pages of the rule book, do not need to be buttressed by implied terms of the sort contended for here. I have no doubt that many of the detailed provisions, such as the reference to an independent third party recruitment company, are intended to ensure that the process is fair, but that is brought about by an express provision. There are many other detailed express provisions, and it is simply not necessary to imply anything further.

·  Moreover, it is not at all clear to me that Mr. Nattrass has established any breach of the implied terms he pleads or, if he has, what the consequences of that breach are. He has not come anywhere near to establishing that he would or should have been selected if the process had been different.

·  It is said that he should have been given the opportunity to comment upon matters which have been taken into account against him in the selection process, in particular loyalty issues. It is said that he was not given that opportunity, which could easily have been afforded to him in interview. Were this a judicial process, subject to the rules of natural justice, Mr Nattrass might have a case, as on his allegations UKIP was, according to him, in breach of the requirements of natural justice. But Mr Eyre, for Mr Nattrass, prudently disclaims any duty on UKIP’s part to observe the rules of natural justice. One can see the intractable difficulties that could lead to. The selection process could be much prolonged and all candidates (not just Mr Nattrass) would have to have the opportunity to comment upon any matter that might be taken into account against them before the process could be concluded.

·  In political life people form views about other people who are in the public eye based upon their track record, and what they have done and said. It seems to me to be quite impossible to argue that there should be a duty to put to a candidate everything that might conceivably be held against that person at the end of the day. What the selection process was meant to achieve was a comparative assessment of all the candidates. One of the reasons for not selecting a candidate may be that there are better candidates. If a duty of natural justice or its equivalent is to be read into the process, then every candidate should presumably have a free reign to comment upon other candidate’s comparative weaknesses, which is clearly not, nor is it claimed to be, the case.

·  It seems to me that what happened in this case does not give rise to a serious argument that Mr. Nattrass has been the victim of a breach of contract or other wrong. In any event, it seems to me that the balance of convenience is very much in favour of allowing the proposed ballot to proceed.

·  I can see that damages is an unattractive remedy for Mr. Nattrass, because he would be in the territory of loss of a chance and there would be major, if not intractable, problems of proof.

·  Nevertheless, I must weigh against that the fact that any injunction I grant now would require, effectively, the whole process to be gone through again with whatever further legal challenge (if any) that may arise at the end of the day after that process has been completed and will disrupt the ballot that everyone is expecting will now go ahead, and the ensuing preparations for next year’s elections, which are fixed in time. It seems to me that the court should require exceptional circumstances before it interferes with the selection processes of a political party and, just as Mr. Justice Stanley Burton in Choudhry v Triesman [2003] EWHC 1203 (Ch), declined to compel a registered political party to allow candidates to stand if the party had genuine and substantial concerns as to the regularity and honesty of the procedure for their selection, so too, in my judgement, where there has been (as in this case) a process, albeit one which (I assume for the purposes of this argument) may be flawed, but which has resulted in the selection of sixty candidates for election, it would be quite inappropriate, save in the most exceptional circumstances, for the court to intervene and interfere with that process.

·  There is no suggestion of corrupt practises in this case, merely of unfairness (I say “merely” without minimising the importance of fairness in public life). There is only so much that the court should be asked to do. The court should be very wary of finding itself in the position where it starts to control part of the ongoing democratic political process in this country. I decline to do so in the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, the injunction is refused.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

A Reminder of the standard of UKIP MEPs with Bloom!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 27/08/2013

Reminder of the standard of UKIP MEPs with  Bloom!

#0124* – UKIP’s GODFREY BLOOMing Stupid – Whores, Plant Pots, Foul Twit TWITTERING

 

 

Posted by Greg Lance-Watkins on 26/09/2010

 

#0124* – UKIP’s GODFREY BLOOMing Stupid – Whores, Plant Pots, Foul Twit TWITTERING

 

Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!

 

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 

 

 their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

 

UKIP’s GODFREY BLOOMing Stupid Whores & Copulating In The Street,

Banned from DEFRA Fishermen’s Meeting,

Drunk In The EU Parliament Representing YOU,

Running to avoid payment in a Bordello,

Urinating in Plant Pots & Banned from Hotel,

Drunk @ The Mansion House & Banned,

Quotes UKIP for Diplomatic Imunity When Arrested,

Speech proclaiming French Killing Greenpeace Operative,

Now this string of The Foul Twit TWITTERING!

 

 

 

 No Wonder Bloom

 

Uses a Wing Nut

 

To Hold His Head On!

 

Goddersukip

 

  1. I’ll be on Radio 3 Counties today on the subject of Burka at 1 pm http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/threecounties/hi/tv_and_radio/
  2. Listen to me on Alex Jones TV End of National Sovereignty & The Beginning of Global Servitude http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMvSmG6Hhlk
  3. #cop15 is just a scam http://bit.ly/5roZio
  4. @DowningStreet is worried about #climate deniers. We should worry more about the stupid Cnuts inside it. http://bit.ly/6OnIbF
  5. Your problem is not ‘climate sceptics’ @EdMilibandMP but that your self-serving green agenda is too easy to see through http://bit.ly/6OnIbF  
  6. Delegates at #copenhagen who think they can control the elements are a bunch of stupid self-serving Cnuts. http://bit.ly/6OnIbF #eu
  7. Delegates at #cop15 who think they can control the elements are a bunch of stupid self-serving Cnuts. http://bit.ly/6OnIbF
  8. on radio Leeds now!!!http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/playlive/bbc_radio_leeds/#UKIP
  9. Visit my blog on Climate Change http://blog.godfreybloommep.co.uk/#UKIP
  10. ‘ And now – Cameron’s cast iron guarantee to the Countryside Alliance.’ #ukip
  11. On radio Humberside today at 12.15. Subject? Alan Johnson’s admission that Labour made mistakes on immigration http://bit.ly/1BIea .#ukip
  12. http://bit.ly/1BIea2  
  13. So now we know why government scientists talk bollocks on climate change#ukip
  14. Please get me on a quango-I’m skint! #UKIP
  15. It is cooling stupid!!!!!#UKIP
  16. So MPs don’t like retrospective legislation. Who does? the FSA!#UKIP
  17. Live on the Jeremy Vine show at 1.00 today http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/ #UKIP
  18. So our rivers are dirty? Thank you EU 1999 Landfill Directive! #UKIP
  19. I gather the BBC have admitted the globe is cooling! Well well. #ukip
  20. I’m wearing a bow tie today- so there! #ukip
  21. Obama does know how expensive free healthcare is #UKIP
  22. Likes Dan Taylor’s blog http://ddtaylor88.wordpress.com # UKIP
  23. Enough is enough!!!! http://tinyurl.com/m87qb4 #UKIP
  24. From nanny state to bully state http://bit.ly/9ajq7 # ukip
  25. Vote UKIP tomorrow for a REAL change!
  26. Successful last day campaigning!
  27. BBC 1 at 6.30 tonight in the mean time you can go have a look at my latest videos on http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision
  28. I was invited by Whitby fishermen to attend a fisheries meeting. Defra barred me!
  29. Lord Stoddart of Swindon the Independent Labour Peer Says VOTE UKIP
  30. I was on Daily Politics today to explain MEPs expenses. Go to http://bit.ly/1OAeTV and put the timer on 03.15.
  31. http://bit.ly/1OAeTV
  32. Come on `Dave` why don`t you take on `Nige` live or don`t you box out of your weight?
  33. Cameron seems to think Kilroy-Silk left UKIP because we are nutters. He thinks we are nutters because we didn`t elect him leader.
  34. supporting his secretaries Emma and Vicki who are playing cricket for Yapham Ladies tonight!
  35. Very happy to be quoted in Hugh Muir’s Politics diary ( the Guardian) …without being lynched : http://bit.ly/t2Xdtless
  36. No to EU internet regulation!!!! http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision
  37. BBC 5 live on the European elections.Was not too bad (as usual) http://www.bbc.co.uk/fivelive/programmes/mayo.shtml (mark on 41 min)#UKIP
  38. http://www.bbc.co.uk/fivelive/programmes/mayo.shtml
  39. @Towler Help Gawain I am confused by twitter!
  40. Watch my latest videos on gender equality issues.http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision #UKIP
  41. Watch my new video on GoddersVision http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision #UKIP
  42. I voted in the economic and monetary affairs committee this morning. Why do they want to regulate on EVERYTHING? #UKIP
  43. Watch me on http://tinyurl.com/de4zlw timer on 34.15 #ukip  
  44. Tax and spend socialist Ken Clark has put his cock in the custard, it was only a matter of time#UKIP
  45. Welcome to the mad, mad world of the EU http://tinyurl.com/day7gb #UKIP
  46. Why does political compassion always involve taking money from good people and giving it to wasters? #UKIP
  47. Good Piece by Barry Gibson Huddersfield Daily Examiner on Maternity Leave http://tinyurl.com/c95d8r #UKIP
  48. Just arrived in Brussels.Many things on my desk; constituents mugged in Spain, wind farms, maternity leave… #UKIP
  49. A bottle of Champagne for anyone who can tell me when Sir Liam Donaldson was right about anything. #UKIP
  50. Politicians! We are in the shit because we overborrowed. We cannot borrow our way out! #UKIP
  51. How much has the government spent on Classic FM adverts telling us not to over rev our cars? #UKIP
  52. Had a young visitor from Strasbourg University today, he asked me what we had voted on today: Couldn’t tell him, all rubbish. #UKIP
  53. Darling says rich EU countries should help poor ones. Could Luxembourg leave the UK a bag of money by the bin behind No 11 asp? #UKIP
  54. Loony Leila Deen, “greeny Deeny”, is on bail for throwing slime over Mandy, Deeny, baby isn’t he slimy enough? #UKIP
  55. On Lord Mandelson’s green custard incident “I thought he had sneezed” # UKIP
  56. Publican looses everything. Get the timer on to 1.35 http://tinyurl.com/df3p9y
  57. Haven’t Police better things to do than catching a publican smoking in his own bar after hours? What is England coming to?
  58. Gordon Brown has announced he will be devising a system where failure is not rewarded with government money. Ironic or what?
  59. http://www.youtube.com/user/GoddersVision

 

See This Twit’s TWITTERINGS CLICK HERE

 

Childish or what CLICK HERE

 

 

Monday, 07 December 2009 13:23
Paul_and_Godfrey
Legend has it that Cnut the Great, Viking King of England, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, 985-1035, once commanded the waves to stop. Two versions of this story exist, one holding that Cnut really believed that he could do such a thing, the other telling that Cnut’s stunt was merely intended to show that he possessed only the power of any other mortal. Either version contains a lesson in humility for the leaders of the world now assembling in Copenhagen.
They believe that with just a stroke of their bureaucratic pens they can control the elements. A directive can be issued, and LO! Climate change will be stopped in its tracks.
There is a gulf between the minds of the Great and the Good and reality. They are under the misapprehension that we can command the natural world. Even worse, for us, they think that their meeting to create a ‘global deal’ on CO2 emissions will result in world peace, environmental utopia, and every single human on earth dancing for joy at the prospect of being subject to carbon laws, regulation, and taxes. Yippeeeee! No more flights! Waheeey! No more cars! Yahooo! No electricity!
One complete bunch of Cnuts – the editorial team at the Guardian newspaper – believes that it, along with 56 other publications throughout the world, can rightly issue instructions to the world through their editorial columns. The group of 56 newspapers today issued a statement simultaneously urging that there were just ‘fourteen days to seal history’s judgment on this generation’.

The science is complex but the facts are clear. The world needs to take steps to limit temperature rises to 2C, an aim that will require global emissions to peak and begin falling within the next 5-10 years. A bigger rise of 3-4C — the smallest increase we can prudently expect to follow inaction — would parch continents, turning farmland into desert. Half of all species could become extinct, untold millions of people would be displaced, whole nations drowned by the sea. The controversy over emails by British researchers that suggest they tried to suppress inconvenient data has muddied the waters but failed to dent the mass of evidence on which these predictions are based.

There is no science which says that 2 degrees is a special point, and that a temperature rise of 3 to 4 degrees will produce the consequences that the Guardian’s biblical prophecies foretell. These are just political targets, dreamt up by political activists. There is no scientific ‘evidence’ on which such predictions are based, and there are no predictions, just the Guardian’s fantasy. There is nothing like this in the IPCC reports. They have made it up. If you can show me otherwise, please be my guest.
Complete Cnuts ex-Beatle, Paul McCartney, and IPCC Chair, Rajendra Pachauri were in Brussels last week, pushing lentils. They want to persuade the EU to persuade its citizens to stop eating meat because, according to them, eating meat causes climate change. This is the kind of nonsense that the Copenhagen conference (and the EU) is all about – bossing people about, telling them how they should live their lives and what to have for dinner. We had a barbecue in Brussels to let McCartney and Pachauri know what we thought of their silly plan.

Paul Nuttal and me, eating sausages at McCartney and Pachauri.

Silly Cnut, the Prince of Wales has been invited to Copenhagen by the Danish government, according to the Times.

He will travel to the Danish capital in a seven-seat RAF aircraft. His spokeswoman said that it was not possible to travel on a scheduled flight because of prior engagements and the risk of being delayed. … In Brazil earlier this year the Prince warned that fighting global warming should have a higher priority on the world’s agenda than fighting poverty, and that there were only eight years left to save the planet.

It’s easy for Cnut’s like Prince Charles to convince themselves that private jets are necessary for their job of saving the planet, and that poverty is just a trivial problem. He ought to be setting an example, and cycling to Copenhagen.
But Charles won’t be the only Cnut travelling to and around Copenhagen in luxury. The Telegraph reports that

On a normal day, Majken Friss Jorgensen, managing director of Copenhagen’s biggest limousine company, says her firm has twelve vehicles on the road. During the “summit to save the world”, which opens here tomorrow, she will have 200. … The airport says it is expecting up to 140 extra private jets during the peak period alone, so far over its capacity that the planes will have to fly off to regional airports – or to Sweden – to park, returning to Copenhagen to pick up their VIP passengers.

You see, while the world’s top brass pat themselves on the back, arranging for international agreements about what to do with your money, and how to tax and regulate your life, they will be tucking into some of the finest grub in the world, staying in luxurious hotels, and swanning about in carbon-guzzling vehicles, all under the pretence that they are ‘saving the planet’.
The Telegraph mentions some other Cnuts…

As well 15,000 delegates and officials, 5,000 journalists and 98 world leaders, the Danish capital will be blessed by the presence of Leonardo DiCaprio, Daryl Hannah, Helena Christensen, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Prince Charles.

What possible use is there for actor Leonardo DiCaprio at an international conference on climate change? Is it a movie? It’s certainly based on fiction. Maybe he’s playing the Cnut?
Remember, you can’t go to this conference to have your say about your own future, and nobody has asked you what you want the British or EU governments to do in Copenhagen. But DiCaprio is given VIP treatment. All you need to get a seat at this table, it seems, is the right number of millions of dollars in the bank. Then everyone will celebrate your heroic efforts to prevent Armageddon. Meanwhile, you and I will have to pick up the tab for this face-stuffing opportunity for the rich and famous, and live with the aftermath.
Our Prime Minister, who is widely regarded as perhaps the biggest Cnut in the whole country, said in the Observer, yesterday,

Let no one be in any doubt about the overwhelming scientific evidence that underpins the Copenhagen conference. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change brings together over 4,000 scientists from every corner of the world. Their recent work has sharpened, not diminished, the huge and diverse body of evidence of human-made global warming. Its landmark importance cannot be wished away by the theft of a few emails from one university research centre. On the contrary, the pernicious anti-scientific backlash that the emails have unleashed has exposed just what is at stake.

Like his idiot pal, Prescott, Brown has plucked the figure of 4,000 scientists out of thin air. There aren’t 4,000 contributing scientists to the IPCC, as I pointed out a few weeks ago. Why aren’t our most senior politicians in command of the facts? How can they expect us to beleive that they can control the weather if they can’t get such basic matters clear in the minds?Simple numbers like 4,000 and simple facts about the structure and operation of the IPCC ought to be well within their grasp.

The purpose of the climate change deniers’ campaign is clear, and the timing no coincidence. It is designed to destabilise and undermine the efforts of the countries gathering in Copenhagen today.

Too bloody right we want to destabilise and undermine the big party at Copenhagen, Mr. Brown. The reason is that you’re a bunch of self-serving Cnuts, who can’t even get your own facts straight. This much is plain: you don’t know what you’re talking about, nobody voted for you to be PM, and nobody voted for the action you are committing the UK to at Copenhagen. You should worry less about the made up ‘scientific consensus’, and think more about what public opinion says.

 

Childish or what CLICK HERE

Now consider team Junius’ views at the time:

Saturday, 11 September 2010

UKIP: Godfrey Bloom banned from Strasbourg hotels after being caught urinating in the corridors

 

 

 

Godfrey Bloom is a drunk, an adulterer and a fool. Every time he opens his mouth or his trousers he brings the Euro-realist movement further into disrepute.

He has now been banned from several hotels in Strasbourg after being caught urinating in a hotel corridor. He was so drunk that he couldn’t make it to a toilet and so decided to ‘water’ a handy pot plant.

A truly disgusting man.

Godfrey Bloom facts:

He sought to influence the outcome of UKIP’s latest NEC elections by sending out a letter ‘advising’ UKIPPERS how to vote. See: LINK

Bloom has admitted visiting brothels in Hong Kong, and said that the majority of prostitutes were not exploited: “In short, most girls do it because they want to”. Perhaps he would like to tell that to the women forced into prostitution by criminal gangs. LINK

He was once arrested by Brussels Police. He farcically pleaded diplomatic immunity after telling the police that he was a UKIP MEP! Fortunately for Bloom and his black ‘companion’ the Police later released them without charge.

After a visit from female students at Cambridge to Bloom in the European Parliament, he was accused of sexual harassment and making a torrent of misogynist remarks. The students, who had in fact been there to show SUPPORT for Bloom, were shocked by his behaviour. One student wrote that Bloom touched her leg.

Mr Bloom asked a colleague ‘Isn’t she the most delicious bimbette? Absolutely thick, but good tits’. Of the businesswoman who he had invited to share the platform at the next day’s press conference, Mr Bloom had only four words: ‘big tits, very feisty’.”

Bloom denied the touching but not the comments.

The three British MEPs with the worst attendance record are David Bannerman, Paul Nuttall and Godfrey Bloom, each averaging under 63 per cent. LINK

Bloom exploited a loophole to pay a relative to work for him.

He states on his website that he “employs no immediate members of his family on his secretarial allowance unlike most other MEPs”. However Victoria Skowronek, his 21-year-old secretarial assistant, is his niece.

Miss Skowronek also works for an investment company in which Bloom is a major shareholder. LINK

Bloom applauded the French bombing of a Greenpeace ship. One man died in the attack. LINK

Bloom secretly claimed a second EU pension. Another so-called ‘Euro-sceptic’ who is happy to reap the rewards of being a Euro MEP!

Bloom was banned from the Mansion House after a drunken outburst.LINK

And he has even made drunken speeches in the EU Parliament.

And to think that we could have Richard North representing UKIP in Yorkshire! He should have been UKIP’s lead candidate in 2004 but Farage rigged the selection so his drinking buddy could join him in Brussels!

To view the original article CLICK HERE

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Mike Nattrass’ Efforts to Expose UKIP Corruption

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/08/2013

Mike Nattrass’ Efforts to Expose UKIP CorruptionTITLE
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Mike Nattrass’ Efforts to Expose UKIP Corruption now feature in The Mirror! One of the comments was amusing ‘Another picture of Farage drinking. Friggin hell doesn’t he ever stop?’!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

UKIP leader Nigel Farage under pressure as own MEP threatens legal showdown

By 

Former deputy leader Mike Nattrass is threatening legal action, claiming Nigel Farage’s party has stitched him up.

Farage is accused of being a 'control freak'
Farage is accused of being a ‘control freak’
Reuters

UKIP is heading for civil war as one of its top Euro MPs claims he has been banned from standing in elections next year.

Former deputy leader Mike Nattrass is threatening legal action, claiming Nigel Farage’s party has stitched him up.

“I’m fighting back with a legal injunction,” Nattrass, 67, told the Sunday People.

“The whole European selection process has been fixed and rules have been ignored. The fight has just started.”

The former property company boss has been West Midlands MEP for UKIP since 2004.

He blames UKIP chairman Steve Crowther for orchestrating a plot to bounce him as a candidate.

And he says he fell foul of the leadership after denouncing a right-wing Italian group with which UKIP was aligned in the European Parliament.

But three years ago he also wrote an email attacking leader Farage as a “control freak”.

It added: “I’m concerned the party brand will be tarnished, even holed below the water line, by his monopoly of power.”

A source said: “Nigel has a long memory for people who have crossed him.”

Last week UKIP was in chaos when chief executive Will Gilpin stepped down after just eight months. He launched a devastating attack on Farage, accusing him of running a party of “enthusiastic amateurs having a good time rather than the professional fighting team they could be”.

It is thought Farage wants to replace Gilpin with ex-Tory MP turned Ukipper Neil Hamilton.

Nattrass has emailed supporters saying: “There has been no reason given for my exclusion from the selection process.” He denies failing “a head-shrinking test”, saying: “I never took one and the shrinks who missed me were the lucky ones.”

Carl Humphries, the Chair of Worcester UKIP branch, is also backing Nattrass. He emailed: “I’m amazed and disappointed to find Mike’s name is not on the list of approved candidates.

UKIP said: “We don’t comment on unsuccessful candidates.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE

To view Mike Nattrass’ original letter regarding Nigel Farage CLICK HERE.

For the full text of Mike Nattrass’ threat to waste his money with Court action he would almost certainly lose CLICK HERE

 

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 24/08/2013

 

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR! Despite a poll of members of UKIP yet to come the final list will be drawn up at the last minute next year in accord with the wishes of Nigel Farage (See UKIP Constitution!)!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

although UKIP presented its list of candidate MEPs on 17-Aug-2013 it seemed so irrelevant that I have only just got around to publishing it!

UKIP just published a tedious and uninformative list, almost as if they wished to hide the facts from their beguilled followers & the claque, so I have picked up a few more facts for you!

MEP candidates

 

 Category: MEP Candidates
 Published on Saturday, 17 August 2013 06:51
The following people are our candidates for MEP selection and will be voted for by the membership. Ballot papers go out at the end of August an the voting closes on September 20.
England
Nigel Farage
Paul Nuttall
Janice Atkinson
Patrick O’Flynn
Stuart Agnew
Ray Finch
Jonathan Arnott
Roger Helmer
Paul Oakley
Gerard Batten
Godfrey Bloom
Margot Parker
Tim Aker
Andrew Smith
Michael McManus
Jill Seymour
Gawain Towler
Julia Reid
Louise Bours
Michael Heaver
Andrew McNeilis
Jane Collins
John Tennant
Phil Henrick
Jonathan Bullock
Diane James
Jason Smith
Bill Etheridge
Amjad Bashir
Anthony Brown
Elizabeth Jones
Shneur Odze
Tony McIntyre
James Carver
William Dartmouth
Lawrence Webb
Keith Crawford
Alastair McFarlane
Steven Woolfe
Michael  Wrench
Michael Green
Peter Whittle
Robert Smith
Lee Slaughter
Nigel Jones
Mike Hookem
Peter Harper
Simon Strutt
Simon Noble
Andy Monk
Patricia Culligan
Alan Stevens
Mick McGough
Lyndon Jones
Donna Edmunds
Barry Mahoney
Barry Cooper
Nigel Wickens
Gary Shores
Richard Elvin

Scotland

DavidCoburn
Mike Scott-Hayward
Christopher Monckton
Otto Inglis
Paul Henke
Malcolm Macaskill
Ross Durance
Steve McKeane
Kevin Newton

Wales

Nathan Gill
James Cole
Gareth Dunn
David Rowlands
Caroline Jones
Martyn Ford
Brian Morris

Let us break this down into EU regions to make it more intelligible.

Though even this listing is before a NATIONAL vote on Regional issues!

It is before Nigel Farage through his muppets & puppets on HIS engineered NEC has parachuted in a few more drinking buddies and chums at the last minute and selected the order HE wants for each region – as is his perogative as a result of the all too apparently rigged vote on Constitutional amendments to make him effectively the dictator in his very own centralised and authoritarian party where Libertarian would seem to interpret as libertine or louche!

Eastern – shortlist
Patrick O’Flynn
Stuart Agnew
Tim Aker
Andrew Smith
Michael Heaver
Andy Monk
Mick McGough
East Midlands – shortlist
Roger Helmer
Margot Parker
Jonathan Bullock
Barry Mahoney
Nigel Wickens
London – shortlist
Paul Oakley
Gerard Batten
Andrew McNeilis
Anthony Brown
Elizabeth Jones
Lawrence Webb
Alastair McFarlane
Peter Whittle
North East – shortlist
Jonathan Arnott
John Tennant
Richard Elvin
North West – shortlist
Paul Nuttall
Michael McManus
Louise Bours
Shneur Odze
Steven Woolfe
Lee Slaughter
Peter Harper
Simon Noble
South East – shortlist
Nigel Farage
Janice Atkinson
Ray Finch
Diane James
Nigel Jones
Simon Strutt
Patricia Culligan
Alan Stevens
Donna Edmunds
Barry Cooper
South West – shortlist
Gawain Towler
Julia Reid
Tony McIntyre
William Dartmouth
Keith Crawford
Robert Smith
West Midlands – shortlist
Jill Seymour
Phil Henrick
Bill Etheridge
James Carver
Michael Wrench
Michael Green
Lyndon Jones
Yorks & N Lincs – shortlist
Godfrey Bloom
Jane Collins
Jason Smith
Amjad Bashir
Mike Hookem
Gary Shores
Scotland – shortlist
David Coburn
Mike Scott-Hayward
Christopher Monckton
Otto Inglis
Paul Henke
Malcolm Macaskill
Ross Durance
Steven McKeane
Kevin Newton
Wales – shortlist
Nathan Gill
James Cole
Gareth Dunn
David Rowlands
Caroline Jones
Martyn Ford
Brian Morris

Lack lustre and bereft of gravirtas or character as the list may be and with several notable individuals notable for their ignorance, ill manners, temper tantrums, stupidity and either alcohol or sexual abuses and perversions:

Let us make the list even more intelligible with the actual results  (marks) apportioned at the interview/selection stage!

Eastern – shortlist
Patrick O’Flynn – 87
Stuart Agnew – 86
Tim Aker – 81
Andrew Smith – 81
Michael Heaver – 78
Andy Monk – 71
Mick McGough – 70

East Midlands – shortlist
Roger Helmer – 85
Margot Parker – 81
Jonathan Bullock – 77
Barry Mahoney – 69
Nigel Wickens – 68
London – shortlist
Paul Oakley – 83
Gerard Batten – 82
Andrew McNeilis – 78
Anthony Brown – 75
Elizabeth Jones – 75
Lawrence Webb – 74
Alastair McFarlane – 74
Peter Whittle – 72
North East – shortlist
Jonathan Arnott – 85
John Tennant – 78
Richard Elvin – 67
North West – shortlist
Paul Nuttall – 89
Michael McManu – 80s
Louise Bours – 79
Shneur Odze – 75
Steven Woolfe – 73
Lee Slaughter – 72
Peter Harper – 71
Simon Noble – 71
South East – shortlist
Nigel Farage – 97
Janice Atkinson – 88
Ray Finch – 85
Diane James – 76
Nigel Jones – 72
Simon Strutt – 71
Patricia Culligan – 71
Alan Stevens – 70
Donna Edmunds – 70
Barry Cooper – 69
South West – shortlist
Gawain Towler – 80
Julia Reid – 79
Tony McIntyre – 75
William Dartmouth – 75
Keith Crawford – 74
Robert Smith – 72
West Midlands – shortlist
Jill Seymour – 80
Phil Henrick – 78
Bill Etheridge – 76
James Carver – 75
Michael Wrench – 72
Michael Green – 72
Lyndon Jones – 72
Yorks & N Lincs – shortlist
Godfrey Bloom – 81
Jane Collins – 78
Jason Smith – 76
Amjad Bashir – 76
Mike Hookem – 72
Gary Shores – 68
Scotland – shortlist
David Coburn – 75
Mike Scott-Haywa – 75rd
Christopher Monckton = 73
Otto Inglis – 73
Paul Henke – 70
Malcolm Macaskill – 66
Ross Durance – 63
Steven McKeane – 62
Kevin Newton – 56
Wales – shortlist
Nathan Gill – 83
James Cole – 79
Gareth Dunn – 76
David Rowlands – 73
Caroline Jones – 69
Martyn Ford – 69
Brian Morris – 63

Already the controversy rages with a very acrimonious series of comments and media coverage of  the rejected James Delingpole,

A Courtcase has been threatened by the deeply disturbed & disturbing Mike Nattrass ( CLICK HERE )who clearly wants to see his loss of credibility escalate and huge eventual costs when he loses his no hope action (as he lost when he issued writs against The Times but was forced to withdraw when he saw their evidence!).

Then of course there was coverage in many papers such as:

The fruitcake test: UKIP candidates face psychometric testing before being selected …but Godfrey ‘Bongo’ Bloom passed

  • Personality quiz used to check the honesty and reliability of politicians
  • Media skills, public speaking and manifesto knowledge also tested
  • Godfrey Bloom who complained about aid to ‘Bongo Bongo land’ passed
  • But another MEP Mike Nattrass failed to make the grade
  • Tough regime designed to prevent repeat of local elections embarrassment

By Matt Chorley, Mailonline Political Editor

|

‘A ‘fruitcake test’ has been used by the UK Independence Party to uncover unsuitable characters who might embarrass the party.Psychometric tests were used to analyse the personalities, reliability and honesty of more than 300 people wanting to run in next year’s European elections.

Experts were called in to prevent a repeat of May’s local elections when UKIP candidates were accused of sexism, racism and homophobia.

But one candidate who passed with flying colours was Godfrey Bloom, the sitting MEP who last week railed against Britain giving aid to ‘Bongo Bongo land’.

Pass: UKIP's Godfrey Bloom cleared the party's psychometric testing, but last week caused a political storm after complaining about British aid being sent to Bongo Bongo land

Pass: UKIP’s Godfrey Bloom cleared the party’s psychometric testing, but last week caused a political storm after complaining about British aid being sent to Bongo Bongo land

UKIP leader Nigel Farage ordered a shake-up of the party selection process to weed out people with views which risked living up to David Cameron’s infamous claim that the party was a ‘bunch of fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’.

A professional recruitment company was hired to oversee the process, ahead of elections to the European Parliament in May 2014.

To read the rest of the article CLICK HERE

I just love the picture of Bloom looking as barking mad as he clearly is – iresponsible to the last and seemingly due to his hold over Nigel Farage not only out of control but beyond discipline, whether urinating in hotel plant pots, heckling as a guest (on behalf of UKIP voters) at a Mansion House function, being arrested for copulating with a black prostitute on the bonnet of a car in a Brussels street, defaming women or abusing foreigners it rather shows the idiotic inadequacy of Psychometric testing to eliminate fruit cakes and liabilities.

What next will the Farage Party sink to, ouija boards, grapho analysis, crystal balls, astrology and Mystic Meg to make their decisions!

It is bad enough having elected politicians who are not up to the job and spend £Millions on so called consultants to advise them how to do the job for which we pay them but imagine if UKIP were to be elected somewhere one could expect them to squander money on chums with jobs as Tarot Card readers, Rorschach testers and divinets – clearly they can’t even manage basic interviews!

At least we haven’t seen the likes of Annabelle Fuller posting confidential videos on You Tube to try to fiddle the results this time SO FAR! Thus causing genuine Court cases and the resignation of UKIP’s chairman as unwilling to go on telling lies for Nigel Farage to protect his doxies!

Little wonder that Will Gilpin quit the job of CEO, I’m astonished he took so long to realise he would be undermined at every opposrtunity by the crass team of self serving clowns running UKIP!

The office witches & wizards put in place to rig the selection, when some were even standing themselves and most were appointed and salaried by Nigel Farage left Nigel Farage gently fuming in his own party, for which he has made up by promising that the liar and cheat Neil Hamilton, having missed out as a candidate will be given a plum job in the party – some fear it might be to replace Will Gilpin as CEO, others believe it will be as chairman of the party or party secretary!

UKIP with its gaggle of Old Etonian has neens at the top – Malcolm Pearson, Stuart Wheeler, Willaim Dartmouth, Hugh Williams & the rest) gets more like The Extremist Nutter Wing of The Tory Party!

In real terms it would be nice to believe that there was someone on their list of hopefuls whom someone of ethics, intelligence and gravitas might wish to represent them but sadly there isnt – they are by and large a dismal collection of self serving and odious political wanabes!

It was interesting to note that Will Gilpin’s comments on UKIP so closely resembled comments made on this and other bl;ogs that are desperately trying to work to see UKIP cleaned up and distanced from the garbage it has attracted with its dash for numbers rather than calliber, ability, commitment, patriotism, gravitas and responsible planned exit from The EU.

Nationalist, racist, yobbery and cowardly sneering by nebishes too ashamed of their behaviour to pout their name to it or dependent on abuse and insult unsubstantiated by facts, strategy, tactics or a plan serves the EUropSceptic cause ill.
It now starts to look as if UKIP is so unfit for purpose as to be iredeemable and more of a hinderance than a help to the cause! Hence when there has been a massive swing towards opposition to membership of The EU UKIP has failed abysmally to gather together those who would have naturally supported them.

Consider the words of Will Gilpin or for that matter the two untrustworthy liars Marta Andreasen & David Bannerman who despite their basic dishonesty did make many of the same comments! The idiotic comments of the likes of Bloom do much to prove the failure of UKIP as do the efforts of the idiotic in the party who try to sell the false premise thaty there is no such thing as bad publicity – well it seems without bad publicity UKIP doers little to attract good publicity!

Little wonder that UKIP has and continues to fail in domestic politics merely acting as the dustbin for protest votes in EU elections!
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »