Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • January 2023
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Posts Tagged ‘Will GILPIN’

Ukip Is Clearly Too Corrupt To Risk Transparency & The Truth!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 17/12/2015

Ukip Is Clearly Too Corrupt To Risk Transparency & The Truth!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW to try to make Ukip electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti Ukip claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name! 

.

Ukip Is Clearly Too Corrupt To Risk Transparency & The Truth, whether on finance, corruption, racism or lack of leadership & moral fibre!

000a ukip-025 count.png

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W

eMail: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

Hi,

REDACTED

Nigel Farage spoke in the European Parliament this morning about the EU’s latest power grab. REDACTEDclick-me.png

donate-button.png
UKIP
UKIP · Lexdrum House, King Charles Business Park, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 6UT, United Kingdom
This email was sent to REDACTED. To stop receiving emails, click here.
Created with NationBuilder, the essential toolkit for leaders.

Which engende red the following response from one long serving former Ukip County Councillor, who now sits Independent of Ukip:

From: REDACTED
Subject: Re: Nigel Farage’s latest speech in the European Parliament
Date: 16 December 2015 13:22:28 GMT
To: UKIP <mail@ukip.org>

 

Dear UKIP HO,
I feel that suitable donations should be made to the fighting fund from the EU ( UK tax payers funded ) salaries of both Kirsten Farage and Annabelle Fuller. 
In the past UKIP appear to have been eager to grab donations from people who could barely afford to pay any monies, so let’s have some transparency and donations from certain UKIP officials with the following information:
1)  A complete break down of all donations/ office costs/ commissions paid and any cash transfers from the Ashford Call Centre which was controlled by Nigel Farage and John Moran out side of the UKIP NEC and the local area committee. This should include a full list of all proceeds and bank transfers ! After all this money was donated for the UKIP campaign over the whole country.
2) A full break down of all MEP’s monies / services donated to the party, including that of Nigel Farage over the years.
3) The financial accounts and breakdown of all EU monies that are given to UKIP because it belonged to an EU group in the parliament.
4) Financial records of EU monies by UKIP MEP’s belonging to a Pan European Party.
5) Donations made to UKIP by its high ranking officials. I have enclosed a sample below, but please supply a full list.
A) Steve Crowther salary was estimated at £100,000 per year
B) Will Gilpin  salary was estimated at £85,000 per year
C) Lisa Duffy  salary was estimated at £65,000 per year plus partner Pete Reeve salary combined with their council salaries.
UKIP is supposed to be a honest, transparent and Democratic Party which detests the corrupt hidden transactions of the EU and so should be open with the above information.
Regards,
Chris

Cllr Chris REDACTED

Group Leader
INDEPENDENCE FROM EUROPE
Vice Chair Economic Scrutiny Committee.
Environmental / Flood Scrutiny Committees
Gibraltar Point Nature Reserve
Tel REDACTED
REDACTED@gmail.com      /   REDACTED@lincolnshire.gov.uk
Sent from my iPad

To provide some background to Ukip’s style of corruption and dishonesty with its rigged internal elections, lack of ethics and integrity, dishonesty and obfusscation in handling other people’s money and donations and more:

Do you know why I was expelled from UKIP? – Statement from Cllr Chris Pain

April 23, 2014

I was a long standing party member for 8 years and a hard working loyal activist, achieving some of the best results for UKIP in any General Election. These efforts were instrumental in getting 16 County Councillors elected, thus becoming the official opposition on the Council, after beating the Tories in 9 out of 11 seats in the Boston/Skegness constituency. The prospect of this being UKIP’s first parliamentary seat was very high. Why would the leadership throw this away?

 

Everything enclosed in this email is backed up by evidence. I have been silent until now, but I believe it is time that all UKIP members were made aware of the real reason that I was expelled, rather than the ‘spin’ and lies that have come from certain persons within the party. When you consider the entire evidence, take into consideration that Nigel Farage has now stated different versions why I was thrown out of the party: for racialism which he did on prime TV, because of the Derek Clark incident. At no time did any of the panel read the evidence that Nigel Farage, Steve Crowther were involved in removing me from the party as early as May 2013, because it incriminated the top people in the party.

 

Matthew Richardson has also played a part in driving me out of the party. He is the UKIP Party Secretary and Director whilst also being the YBF Executive Director. If you look at their website you will find the following information, quote “YBF is a British conservative not-for-profit training, YBF enjoys close links with the British Conservative Party.”

 

HOW THINGS HAPPENED IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER

 

 

1.  THE FIRST THING
 

Nigel Farage refused to attend the East Midland Training Conference at Skegness in 2013

 

 

2.  BOSTON/SKEGNESS PARTY POLITICAL CANDIDATE (PPC)
 

Lisa Duffy, Party Director, tried to take away my PPC for Boston/Skegness at the NEC meeting on the 6th May, 2013. She stated that she and Steve Crowther hadn’t been notified of the hustings. I proved that I had been adopted by producing copy emails which had been sent to them both, by Don Ransome Regional Organiser, giving them the required notice. It was discovered that Don Ransome, UKIP’s paid Regional Organiser, had wiped the emails from his computer. (The Regional Organiser and his wife have had a legal letter to stop them spreading lies and defaming my character.) The NEC voted unanimously in favour of my adoption.

 

 

3.  RACIST COMMENTS

 

At the end of May last year my Facebook was cloned and was posted to ‘Hope Not Hate,’ who immediately forwarded it to the Sunday Mirror.

 

Monday 3rd June, 2013 at the NEC monthly meeting, I was questioned about the posting. I produced several hundred Facebook members’ statements, confirming that they had never seen anything racist or untoward on my site, or elsewhere attributed towards me. These people were linked to me personally so that any post I made was automatically posted to their computers. I had letters from friends of all nationalities stating that they had known me for years and that I was not racist.

 

Steve Crowther presented a case that these posts had been on my Facebook page and been deleted. I stated quite categorically that the posts had never been on my site at anytime.

 

The following week, I explained to Steve Crowther that I had evidence, produced by an IT expert, which confirmed that the racialist comments were never on my Facebook.

 

Steve Crowther maintained that it would not make a difference. I told him of course it did, as obviously, if they were never there in the first place, then how could I have deleted them.

 

In addition Steve Crowther advised that I had never reported the incident to the police. This was reported to the Skegness Police Force and ultimately passed on to Action Fraud – Crime Reference Number NFRC130500251709 that refers. There was also a full CID investigation into the incident. Mr Crowther, with his ulterior motivies, persuaded the NEC that I was a liar, with his own spin on the situation, without any actual evidence. I was suspended from the NEC for three months pending the outcome of the police investigation of which I was cleared.

 

 

4.  BEHIND THE SCENES

 

Steve Crowther sent an email instructing Pete Reeves to remove me as leader of the UKIP Lincolnshire County Councillors, despite which four attempts were made and failed before Steve Crowther finally suspended me from the party. Two ex Conservatives, Victoria Ayling and Robin Hunter-Clarke, were allowed into the party and became elected councillors for UKIP in Lincolnshire, being pushed to the forefront by the leadership. These persons subsequently received an email from Steve Crowther advising them of my suspension. No other UKIP Councillor has received such an email. Victoria Ayling and Robin Hunter Clark then approached the Chief Executive of Lincolnshire County Council to persuade him to remove me from my UKIP Group, at the same time disrupting the Group, making constant attempts to remove me as Leader. They had already been removed as Deputy Leaders, by unanimous vote, because of their continuous disruption and none attendance. They went on to break our groups constitution by organising a separate meeting in respect of which only Councillors of their choosing were notified. All this time false information was being leaked to the press.

 

In June 2013, all elected Councillors were invited to Brussels. John Beaver was directly involved in a conversation with Nigel Farage during which Nigel stated that Chris Pain was no longer in favour with the party and would soon be excluded.

 

5.  FLAWED MEP SELECTION PROCESS

 

On the 18th August 2013, I forwarded an email which had been sent to UKIP MEP Mike Nattrass.

 

In this email Steve Crowther states:-

“This NEC notes the technical procedural failure in relation to the appointment of the selection panels for the selection of MEPs. Further notes that the process was carried out by the following people acting as a de facto selection panel.”

 

(De Facto means as a fact authority being exercised or an entity acting as if it had authority, even though the legal requirements have not been met.)

 

Doug Denny stated:

“The appointment of independent persons was to be by the delegated, by an independent sub-committee of the NEC, not by the full NEC, nor by any individual.

 

At no time was Steve Crowther given delegated powers by the NEC to appoint these people. There is nowhere in the minutes to show he had these delegated powers conferred. The selection procedure using delegated people for the personal assessments is, I believe, seriously flawed, probably fatally so.

 

The people for the selection / assessment panel were appointed by Steve Crowther without approval of the NEC members in a vote. The whole procedure is therefore flawed if this is correct. The MEP selection process was changed by Steve Crowther against the wishes of the Regional Chairmen and party Activists.”

  

6.  CONSPIRACY – WILL GILPIN, EX CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF UKIP
 

The intention to take me out of the party was confirmed in a (recorded) conversation with Will Gillpin, UKIP Chief Executive Officer and also several other senior UKIP members. See verbatim conversation below:-

 

Chris Pain: “Well did Steve have any conversations with you or anything separately or?”

 

Will Gilpin: “I’ll give you an honest answer which is I can’t remember the details, but I was well aware that Steve Crowther had a lot of activity towards you and had made it very clear that he would like to get you out of the party, and would do whatever he could to achieve that.”

 

Will Gilpin: “Do you remember when you arranged your conference; you invited me and Katie to speak at it, or me to speak at it. I turned you down because Steve Crowther gave me a direct order that I wasn’t to attend, and that I wasn’t to have anything to do with you, and given that he was paying my pay cheque went along. Just because, Steve Crowther’s argument to me was basically that the conference was a project designed to get you elected, and as we didn’t want to get you elected, we had to do our best to not support it”

 

Chris Pain: “ I mean was it ever said why he wanted me out the party, has he ever dropped that reason out, or…? Is it down to Nigel or…?

 

Will Gillpin: “Yeah, it’s all been partly down to Nigel. I think it’s because you’re pushy and Nigel doesn’t like anyone pushy because they might go for the leadership at some point.”

 

*The lack of attendance of UKIP speakers caused the Gala Night, Sunday training and PPC assessment day to be cancelled. We were also fined for late cancellation. Although Steve Crowther’s actions hampered the weekend, the Conference day was a success.

 

7.  MY RESIGNATION FROM THE NEC

 

2nd September 2013

I resigned from the NEC. I decided I could no longer rubber stamp what I deemed to be a flawed MEP selection process. I could not condone the way the NEC business is conducted i.e. in total secrecy, not informing the members of its actions, or how people vote. I believe this to be totally undemocratic and with this in mind I typed out my resignation from the NEC.

 

I also on this date registered my disapproval re Steve Crowther’s lack of integrity and the flawed MEP selection process. I presented the transcript of Will Gilpin’s recording to the NEC. Despite this Matthew Richardson and Jonathan Arnott refused to allow the recording be played, stating that I could forward the recording to NEC members, advising that my complaint against Steve Crowther, re the flawed MEP selection process and the email that I sent to Mike Nattrass, would be looked at during the NEC meeting in October as it was classed as not urgent.

 

8.  SUSPENSION

 

Friday the 6th September

After producing this information I was suspended from the party on the following by Steve Crowther using his emergency disciplinary powers, and referring to the Will Gilpin recorded conversation. At this stage I must point out that as an NEC Member, (which means I was a Director of UKIP Ltd), I was entitled to record any evidence of wrong-doing within the party/company. In addition it is not illegal to record a conversation in one’s own home.

 

 

9.  EXPULSION

 

11th September
I was expelled from the group of Councillors. 5 UKIP long standing members supported me as they were aware of previous events, which had lead to the expulsion.

 

12th September

Notice of a disciplinary hearing to be held on the 18th September. My solicitor chased for case documents from UKIP and this appeared over the weekend. This left only 48 hours which to avail myself of all the allegations. My legal representation and I questioned the makeup of the panel, which could hardly have been classed as impartial.

 

 

10. THE HEARING

 

I was able to prove at the hearing that all the statements and accusations made against me were false. The only query involved an apparent difference in the structure of emails, surrounding the attachments, which appeared to the amateur, to have been presented in different ways. Being untrained in IT myself, I was unable at the time to produce an answer. (After, consulting with an experienced technician later, it appears that these differences relate solely to the type of systems in operation in each case.)

 

Apart from the computer issue I answered all accusations truthfully and with a clear conscience, despite which I was still expelled from the party. The primary issue at the hearing was the forwarding of the email and recording. I produced evidence that Mrs Pain Senior sent the recording and email’s, whilst I was not in the office and was on site at a Planning meeting.

 

Matthew Richardson stated at the end of the hearing:

 

“well we’ve explained in the sense that we agree with the Chairman’s reasoning, that the dissemination of this material is damaging to the party and erm, as a result we have no choice but to expel you”.

 

At the hearing it was stated by Matthew Richardson that he would be recording the hearing and provide a copy of the recording and the transcript. No recording was provided and the transcript was eventually sent. I can prove the transcript is both inaccurate and has been altered.

 

 

11.  UKIP CONFERENCE

 

At the UKIP conference, three UKIP Lincolnshire Councillors were discussing the situation regarding me when Nigel Farage walked into the room. He said nothing for a while then said see verbatim conversation below:-

 

Nigel Farage: “Pain had caused trouble for the party for a long time” Alan Jesson: “What do you mean by that” Nigel Farage: “He had made allegations against Derek Clark MEP, and that he, Pain, was a troublemaker and not to be trusted.”

Alan Jesson: “What about all the good work Chris has done and Lincolnshire needed Chris.”

Nigel Farage: “UKIP is bigger than Pain, and Pain was not coming back into the party.”

Alan Jesson: “Chris will be appealing”Nigel Farage got mad and started banging his fists on the table

Nigel Farage: “I have no influence over the appeal, but I tell you now that Pain is not coming back into the party”

 

I need to clarify, at this stage, that the East Midlands Committee asked Derek Clark to stand down as chairman. I have EMCC minutes to prove that Charles Swaby had raised the issue of Derek Clark, as per NEC rules that he wasn’t entitled to be Chairman. There were several discrepancies over Derek Clark’s OLAF investigation where he was found guilty. He had to repay over £30,000.00 back to the EU because of misuse of his allowances. He lied to the committee regarding this fact. There was also his involvement in the Leicester by election and flawed Mayoral candidate. The vote was unanimous by the East Midlands Committee to remove Derek. Derek’s response was to disband the EMCC committee at the start of the meeting, without the committee’s prior knowledge.

 

 

12.  SUPPORTING COUNCILLORS EXPELLED

 

The 5 Councillors that supported me had an email confirming that they had done nothing wrong and were ‘in good standing with the party’. Matthew Richardson stated he would come to Lincolnshire to resolve the issue, he never came. These Councillors were subsequently expelled from UKIP for supposedly forming a political party, which was proved at their hearing, not to be the case and confirmed by Lincolnshire County Council and Lincolnshire Echo. They were promised notification by December after my appeal had been heard, about their situation. To date they have heard nothing from the party.

 

 

13.  APPEAL HEARING

 

The panel at my Appeal hearing should have been unbiased but two out of the three who sat on the panel were EFD employees, paid and controlled by Nigel Farage.

 

Unable to attend the hearing due to Council commitments, I had asked for 3 alternative dates to be set, once the Data information that I had requested had been received. Jonathan Arnott stated if I couldn’t attend on the date they had set, the hearing would go ahead without me. This breaks UKIP’s constitution that states that the ‘appellant’ should be present, and also breaks the case of natural justice in the court of law. Data Request information has still not been forth coming to date.

 

After reading the Appeals panel conclusion I once more discovered that Steve Crowther had lied to the panel. The panel stated that I was expelled because of the email that was sent to Mike Nattrass, which means I was thrown out of UKIP for whistle blowing on the flawed MEP selection process.

 

I have evidence which shows that Matthew Richardson has instructed the NEC to alter previous NEC minutes to suit Steve Crowthers actions.

 

 

One thing for consideration is that I was anti any pre election packs between UKIP and the Conservative party. This is where UKIP members would stand down in safe Tory seats. Nine regional chairmen had supported me in favour of regional MEP selections. I would not betray members or the British public.

 

If you need any proof of all of the above please ask.

To view the original of the statement above CLICK HERE

There are clearly many many more examples of self serving dishonesty and corruption within Ukip particularly in the upper management and leaderrship group – such as:

Ukip still haven’t given any kind of cogent or responsible response to the facts surrounding their fraud and corruption reported with links CLICK HERE

Then there is the abiding issue of Racism in Ukip CLICK HERE

Here are a few other issues mostly concerning Gawain Towler, which Ukip has failed to sort out CLICK HERE

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS,
>SEARCH<
&
>Side Bars<
&
The Top Bar >PAGES<Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’: http://GL-W.com
http://Leave-The-EU.com
Documents, Essays & Treaties: https://GLWdocuments.wordpress.com/
The Hamlet of Stroat: http://Stroat-Gloucestershire.com
The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com
Chepstow Chat: http://ChepstowChat.wordpress.com/
Christopher Storey: http://ChristopherStory.wordpress.com/
Des Watkins DFC: http://DesWatkins.wordpress.com/
Hollie Greig etc.: http://HollieGreigetc.wordpress.com/
Psycheocracy: http://Psycheocracy.wordpress.com/
The McCann Case: http://TheMcCannCase.wordpress.com/
The Speculative Society of Edinburgh: http://SSOE.wordpress.com/
Stolen Kids, Dunblane: http://StolenKids-Dunblane.blogspot.com/
Stolen Kids, Bloggers: http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.co.uk/

Skype: GregL-W

TWITTER: @Greg_LW

Stolen Kids Blogs with links:
http://StolenKids-Bloggers.Blogspot.com
Stolen Oyster with links:
http://StolenOyster-Bloggers.Blogspot.com
Stolen Trust with links:
http://StolenTrust-Bloggers.Blogspot.com
Stolen Childhood with links:
http://StolenChildhood-Bloggers.Blogspot.com
NB:
  • I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
  • ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
  • I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
  • I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
  • I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
  • I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
  • I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
  • I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
  • I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
  • I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
  • I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
  • I am NOT a WARMIST
  • I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
  • I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
  • I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
  • I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
  • I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
  • I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
  • I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
  • I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms

Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings

& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Will Gilpin In Conversation With Chris Pain

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/01/2015

Will Gilpin In Conversation With Chris Pain
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Will Gilpin In Conversation With Chris Pain provide background and detailed facts relative to the self serving corruption of Ukip’s upper ranks!

000a ukip-025 count.png

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

having published extracts from this document in the past and now that the media have had the opportunity to use such extracts as they wish and store parts of the document for future use it seems apposite to publish the full document – as a matter of archive.

By all means comment and utilise the document if you wish but I do request that if you use a part of the document only, that you strive not to alter or use an extract which does not convey the sentiment it would seem to portray.

For fairness I would also ask that you provide a link to this site so that people who wish to can read it in full, for total balance.

I trust it helps you to understand just how corrupted Ukip actually is! I shall let the document speak for itself.

CP : Chris Pain
PAIN, Chris 01
WG : Will Gilpin
GILPIN, Will 01
KS : Katie Snape
SNAPE, Katie (Will Gilpin) 01

CP: Hi, is that Will?

WG: Yes.


CP: Hi Will, it’s Chris Pain from UKIP.


WG: Hello there.


CP: Hello. First of all, I thought we’d start the conversation saying sorry you are not in the party)

anymore.

WG: Yeah, yeah.


CP: To say I was shocked doesn’t quite cover it.


WG: Yeah I was too.


CP: I think basically I just can’t, I can’t get my head around the fact that we should be that used to

men who could be an asset to the party and I just thought we ‘ve got people there that they aren’t
seeming to be pushing the party forward.

WG: I’m a bit confused by the whole thing. I wasn’t given any warning, you know. I told them I was

unhappy with the constraints on my loral but that’s clearly annoyed Nigel.

CP: It’s ridiculous because, because as the CEO…I couldn’t understand why you was reporting to

Steve Crowther anyway.

WG: Yeah, yeah, yeah.


CP: It was obviously they just wanted to keep you in check.


WG: Well my interpretation is Steve had his indicative powers taken off him, he saw me as a way of

shutting the NEC up

CP: yes


WG: while not being challenged.


CP: Yeah. Well I’m just absolutely gobsmacked, I can’t believe it thinking well, where are we

supposed to be going with this one. At a time where we should be pushing forward, we’ve got the
new offices at which you organised and things like that

WG: Yeah


CP: Unfortunately, There seems to be and inner circle of yes people who just keep saying yes.


WG: yes indeed yes


CP: I mean I noticed it when Nigel came to Boston, the fact that we were round the table having a

meal and the Sun rang wanting to do a big article on how Pro Margaret Thatcher him and the party
was.

WG: Yep.


CP: And we got Ray Finch , Michael Heaver and Gowain all saying yes great Nigel , oh how fantastic,

oh great story’ because Nigel was saying yes, or ‘sorry Nigel, I was a big fan of Margaret Thatcher
Lord Tebbit, that’s prior to the prior to the EU as well ‘but you’ve got to realise North of Watford, in
places she the anti Christ.

WG: Yes


CP: I said it’s something you’re not gonna gain…I said the Sun paper is not a big Conservative paper,

it’s a working class paper that people look at for the boobs. I said it’s something I never get …I said
it’s not for Conservative readers and if it was in the Mail or Guardian, Express, Express probably
more, yes I could see them making an impact with it if that was there but in the Sun it’s in the wrong
place

WG: Yes


CP: and the neutral go ‘oh, no no no no’. What amazed me is that people sat round the table saying

‘oh you should tell them yes, do it’, rather than saying well no Nigel I think that’s wrong.

WG: Yep


CP: And that’s what he seems to be happy with.


WG: Yep, no that’s all he ever is really, If you look at the MEP selection list you know the top 10

people are the top 10 sicko fantasty list really aren’t they.

CP: Well yeah we…we…and also it’s even worse than that because what we found is if you look at

the MEP list the top 2 to 4 are his favoured few and the remainder are people who are no hopers
who aren’t gonna challenge

WG: Yep, it’s either people you’ve never heard of or Nigel’s mates.


CP: Yep, he’s too obvious. For you for the South East, we’ve got Piers is not on there, Steve Harris I

know not everyone likes him but he’s popular locally, Andrew Montclief I know Andy…illness
problem, but he’s ex NEC member policy maker he still should stand a chance,

WG: yes


CP: Neil Hamilton was a surprise but obviously that was an internal deal done, he’s been promised a

job since anyway in the party

WG: Yeah, yeah yeah.


CP: So that’s when you look at Mike Nattrass our region yes, I know Steve was going to take me out,

but you look at, the three people after Margot Helmer one has been a party nine months so should
be on there without going to a separate assessment, one has been in the party a long time, didn’t do
anything last European election campaign, the was a number two on the East Midlands committee,
didn’t get re voted on so didn’t go for four years, there’s not been anything since. And somebody
nobody’s ever heard of – even people here don’t even know who he is.

WG: Yup


CP: So he it sticks out like a sore thumb, when you’ve got Jonathan Arnott dropped in on number 1

in the North East.

WG well that’s astonishing isn’t it


CP: I can think of better words Will, but I think astonishing is quite a polite way of putting it, and

although David Coburn has got a link to Scotland, I don’t think he’s been there for 34 years.
(Phone rings)

WG: I think I see that’s a way to get rid of David Coburn


CP: Oh yes,We’ll give him the number 1 there The thing he’s not switched on to in Scotland is

Scottish people vote for the candidate, so I’m aware that some of the votes in the past for the NEC
has been dubious to say the least so when it goes to Elcom so that’s not going to do David any good
at all.

WG: No, no, no, and the other thing that surprises me, thats putting it mildly, is Nuttall becoming

Number 2 I simply don’t believe it

CP: Yeah


WG: Yep you know Paul, he’s fine But I do not believe he is the best candidate the party can put

forward after Nigel,

CP: No No


WG: the coincidence of Nigel 1, Nuttall 2 just shows the whole thing has been gerimandered.


CP: Oh yes Without a doubt.


WG: Why they excluded me from the process of course.


CP: Well yes the thing is, it’s quite obvious, Steve did it from day one, the whole process, pushed it

rammed it through made sure he was chairing the subcommittee no minutes from the
subcommittee at all, which to be fair is not unprofessional, it’s crooked,

WG: Yeah.


CP: And then actually pushed it forward even further to reach exactly where people are, without the

actually NEC passing a mandate on how people should be picked, good.

WG: Yeah, yeah.


CP: And these all way through


WG: And it’s a win-win because either we accept the list that we are given or we reject the entire

process at which point Nigel appoints the list.

CP: yes


CP:it would probably, probably be a bit fairer actually at least you can pin it on him.


WG: This is so.


CP: I look at what we’ve done so far and although I don’t agree with that at least it would save a lot

of people a lot of time, energy and effort, in the party…

WG: And money…


CP: And money, and at least it would be straightforward until that’s Nigel’s choice that’s it


WG: Yeah, yeah.


CP: And all Steve has done is pushed it through regardless.


WG: yeah


WG: It was perhaps the final straw for me in terms of my enthusiasm for the process but…


CP: Yeah. So What are you doing now the Will?


WG: Nothing. I’ve taken a holiday for a week and now I’m going to start working out what to do. I

had to wait until you know I wont, I won’t find something else while I’m in the media, you know,
given that I’m not meant to go and work for another political party so

CP: no


WG: I’ll just have to wait for that to die down you know.


CP: Are they still paying you?


WG: They gave me a month’s notice, yeah.


CP: inaudible


WG: inaudible, yeah. It ‘s irritating but it’s something. You know, to be fair I said to Steve lets get to

the conference and then after the conference we’ll have a chat about my, my position.

CP: yes


WG: Steve said yes that’s fine because conference is important, but (inaudible) so I might have been

leaving in October anyway. Because Steve Steve hired me as chief executive and then tells me my
inaudible is the database, my other responsibility is the head office staff, you know, that’s, that’s a
pointless role, and it’s been annoying me that there was a lot of people bitching about me in the
party because I get paid the most of any party employee and I do nothing of any value, and I agree
with them. You know, you know,

CP:


WG: em you don’t hire a chief executive and not let him do anything.


CP: Stuart Wheeler touched on it once, asking why you was reporting to Steve as the Chief

Executive, and he was you know pushed to the side, but I’m also aware of the fact that, assuming
that things are being discussed the NEC, and they’re not coming out in the minutes.

WG: Yep.


CP: They’re being deliberately missed off the minutes.


WG: Yes indeed


CP: erm And what’s going to happen with Mike Nattrass is in the main meeting I know it’s definitely

cos I, said that (no paid party employee being) part of the MEP (selection) process.

WG: yeah yeah


CP Steve saying I’lll go and have a long summer holiday, with nothing to do, I said look Steve

(there’s no problem overseeing it ) but, but last time we had independent people of good standing
in the process,

WG: Yeah


CP: and then what they did it was all passed on.


WG: yeah yeah yeah


CP: And of course that’s why he’s not had the committees ratified by the NEC because they’ve said

that, he knew he would not get it through .

WG: Yeah


CP: So it’s absolutely…it’s diabolically corrupt.


WG: It is, it is. And you know, it really disappoints me…the party could have been so much more

over the next couple of years.

CP: No No he’s took his chance


WG: inaudible Nigel wants to carry on the way he is, with his little gang of mates having a bit of fun

in the media, you know, and that’s it as far as he is concerned I think.

CP: Well I think it is aimed at a pact with the Tories in 2015.


WG: Well…


CP: Something that Paul said to me a year ago.


WG: Yeah, yeah, it’s certainly been discussed, I’ve heard it discussed, my honest view is it’s not

aimed at anything at all other than Nigel getting a decent income and a decent pension, whether
that’s is in the House of Lords or…

CP: Or that’s what I’ve heard anyway…


WG: but a commission sees….


CP: Yeah That’s what I’ve heard. That’s the target, but my view if you do that the party’s is dead in

the water anyway.

WG: Yes it is


WG: No, he doesn’t care does he. I don’t think he does.


CP: Yes, No, I think that’s the final nail in the coffin, and he’s worried that he doesn’t want anybody

in a situation as an MEP that could take the party on, if he said ‘we’re doing this’ and then somebody
else in a prominent position could say well, no Nigel, we’re not doing that’.

WG: That’s he that’s why nobody with any personality


CP: Yes


WG: can get onto the list, isn’t it?


CP: Yeah. No no inaudble


WG: That’s why he keeps Paul Nuttall around. Paul is a competent MEP but Nigel knows he he could

never be leader.

CP: Him also, I think he’s blackmailing Paul as well


WG: Okay, Okay.


CP: but I won’t go there


CP: Something come up before about the the national selection


WG: yeah


CP: and Paul was vehemently against it


WG: yes


CP: and went into a room with Nigel, and then came out and didn’t say a word at the meeting,


WG Okay


CP: so I’m 99% positive he’s blackmailing him over Louise and other things.


WG: Yeah, yeah.


CP: And that’s why I think how he’s keeping Paul on check, cos Paul says he’s not even speaking to

Steve Crowther.

WG: Okay.


CP: I think that’s what Nigel’s got to has got his little black book, thats he’s attacking people on,


WG: yes


CP: I think that’s how he does it. If people are honest and he hadn’t got anything on them, he

doesn’t like that.

WG: yes yes


WG: It’s probably something he learned from Annabell.


CP: He did say that, yeah. Can I ask you a straight question?


WG: Yeah.


CP: it’s involving me


WG: yes


CP: Did the Steve Crowther have any involvement on my side when it came in front of the NEC?


WG: What…when it came to your three month suspension?


CP: Well no before that.


WG: What did you mean?


CP: Well did Steve have any conversations with you or anything separately or?


WG: I’ll give you an honest answer which is I can’t remember the details, but I was well aware that

Steve had a lot of activity towards you and had made it very clear that he would like to get you out
of the party and would do whatever he could to achieve that.

CP: that would be his aim, that ties up with what somebody else said as well


WG: okay yes


CP: somebody else quite high up has said exactly the same


WG: Do you remember when you arranged your conference, invited me and Katie to speak at it, or

me to speak at it, and I turned you down because Steve gave me a direct order that I wasn’t to
attend and that I wasn’t to have anything to do with you, and given that he was paying my paycheck
I went along.

CP: that’s obvious but, but it’s unbelievable…


WG: yes so


CP: it can’t believe,


WG: Just because, his argument to me was basically that it was a…that the conference was a project

designed to get you elected, and as we didn’t want to get you elected, we had to do our best to not
support it.

CP: That explains why Lisa and everybody else cancelled on Sunday as well, because they cancelled

on the Sunday, they were doing the Sunday training for people and they cancelled.

WG: Right


CP: I take it that They got the same?)


WG: I imagine so. I’m not aware but I’m sure they would have done, Steve was pretty ,pretty

animated about it, you know. And I trusted him, because I liked Steve, I didn’t really know him that
well, but I’d done a couple of bits of him, and I liked him and I guess he thought that because I liked
him he

WG: could get me to do what he wanted, you know. So it’s taken me quite a while to realise…that, I

haven’t still quite figured him out.

CP: But to be honest with you how can I say this.


WG: I know he doesn’t like Nigel, but on the other hand this is his career isn’t it.


CP: He says he doesn’t like Nigel but… I think that…


WG: But he knows that Nigel is his…


CP: Paymaster.


WG: Yes, exactly, his gravy train.


CP: I’m aware of the fact that…I mean Steve (first), I got on with okay,


WG: yes


CP: as a bloke he’s a really likeable bloke, but when you scratch beneath the surface and then you

see some of the antics that he does, it’s not for the party. He’s not got the party’s interest in mind.

WG: No, no, no. And that’s the fundamental point – that neither Nigel nor Steve have the party’s

interest in mind. There are a lot of other people in the party who don’t either, but that’s the nature
of politics, there’s a lot of people for who it is a career and they’d be happily doing this for the Tories
or Labour.

CP: Without any conviction at all


WG: Janice Atkinson, the betting in the office was how soon after being elected an MEP she defects

to the Tories.

CP: Yeah, yeah …it is unbelievable. I mean, I’ve been tipped off that Annabelle Fuller had something

to do with my thing in the Mirror. We’re getting evidence because apparently she’s had an affair
with editor of the Mirror.

WG: Okay, well yeah, but whoever she had an affair with.


CP: Me, me. I still think she’s a trollop. But that’s by the by, but no that’s, I had heard that from a

certain source as well. Which doesn’t surprise me because then

WG: inaudible


CP: Which would mean Steve could be behind it?


WG: Yeah.


CP: seriously Will I’m sorry for everything that’s happened, it’s daft and you get people in the party

then this happens It seems to be a common, common thing if you get anybody whose, who wants
to do anything…

WG: Yeah, yeah. It’s a shame…


CP: Whats The biggest shame is we stand such a chance


WG: yes


CP: to do so well


WG: yes yes, and you’ve got to do it the same way you done it in the past which was fine for winning

one by election at a time.

CP: yes


WG: yeah


CP: Yeah, never mind. Anyway I hope best of luck in the future Will


WG: Thank you very much.


CP: So I hope everything goes alright for you.


WG: Yeah.


CP: upon you anyway inaudible


WG: It’s just unprofessional, the whole thing, you know.


CP: Well mean you can turn round and say that you’ll work to the end of your contract and give you

six months whatever away, sort yourself out thats different. And if they gave you a straight list of
jobs of what they wanted you to do…

WG: Yeah, think about what could be achieved in that timeframe.


CP: Yeah, ‘look, this is what we want to achieve’, and then if it turns out in 6 months you’ve not

achieved any of them that’s a different kettle of fish. But when they’ve held your hands behind your
back and not let you do anything,

WG: yeah


CP: and then say well hold on, what…why…I’ve done everything you’ve asked me to do.


WG: Yeah. All of my complaints have been about not being given work to do, not about the opposite

you know.

CP: Oh well, never mind. Best of luck for the future Will, I hope it goes well.


WG: cool


CP: Cheers then Cool. Bye.


WG: Bye.


CP: Went through it quite clearly with him, more than understanding it


WG: yeah


CP: he kept going on the same tact the fact that ‘oh, it doesn’t matter the fact they weren’t on your

site’.erm I said of course it does, because that is what people think, that it was on my Facebook site.

WG: Yeah, yeah, yeah, although you were dammed if you did and damned if you didn’t in fact,

weren’t you.

CP: Yeah. yeah


WG: Because if you had admitted they were on your site he would have you for that, and if you had

said they weren’t he would have accused you of lying so.

CP: The downside is, he knows the fact we weren’t there. He knew we weren’t there afterwards.


WG: Okay, okay.


CP: I actually gave him the proof and sent it to him directly, showing him where they were.


WG: yeah


CP: I didn’t get that till I approached the news editor who actually sent it through to me


WG: Okay. Yeah


CP: But I’d like to think they’re what I (inaudible) because I’ve been told by somebody else he was

using it purposely to actually take me out the MEP position and to take me out of the party. Which
coincides with what you said.

WG: Yeah, I I know that that was something you wanted to do. I can’t tell you if there was any

specific plan at that instance other than he just saw this opportunity and thought that’s good you
know.

CP: I mean how long have you been…I mean who ever said why he wanted me out the party, has he

ever dropped that reason out or…? Is it down to Nigel or…?

WG: Yeah, its all been partly down to Nigel. I think it’s because you’re pushy and Nigel doesn’t like

anyone pushy because they might go for the leadership at some point.

CP: That’s ridiculous. I mean I can’t understand how Steve, after all the work, hard work I’ve done,

and other people have done with this MEP selection process he’s proved it, I mean all he’s done is
pick the people he wants there and anybody who stands half a chance of challenging are out the
running, be it Neil Hamilton,

WG: yeah


CP: be it Nattrass, be it Piers Wauchope all the people that are good people who should be on that

list aren’t there.

WG: Yeah, yeah, no I agree. And I think if Nigels Nigel protecting his position (inaudible).


CP: its unbelievable


WG: Yeah And that is why the party can’t achieve what it should have achieved, you know.


CP: You think that’s why Steve trying to take me out the party period its just because he thinks

obviously I’m pushy and

WG: Yeah, I mean… he has not been explicit to me so you can’t quote me and say ‘Steve says this’,

because I don’t know. But that’s the impression I got from Steve, I didn’t get the impression there
was anything else behind it, but there might be…maybe is there something that happened between
the two of you in the past?

CP: no


WG: inaudable


CP: No, no, no.


WG: Or anything like that, then I expect its just Steve and Nigel think you were getting too big for

your boots, building a power base for yourself.

CP: Right


WG: They only want one power base in the party, don’t they?


CP: yeah ridiculous


WG: In other parties there would be lots of power bases, in UKIP there have never been lots of

power bases have there?

CP: No…just one that’s that


WG: Yeah.


CP: But actually what peeves me off is that all the hard work you do for the party,


WG: yeah


CP: then you get treated like that.


WG: Yeah, yeah, yeah, no I understand that.


CP: I mean, after weeks of going out at weekends and doing the elections and no money from the

party and things like that, and you think well hold on, this is ridiculous.

WG: Yeah,


CP: I mean that the only one I can see is Steve being removed as chairman of the NEC, he’s obviously

got, got to much power which he’s wielding at his and Nigel behest and not for the benefit of the
members of the party.

WG: the problem is that he will be replaced by somebody else who relies on Nigel for his

employment you know,

CP: yeah


WG: the chairman is appointed at the whim of the leader that’s the rule isn’t it


CP: yeah


WG: there fore


CP: it probably got to change and be appointed by the will of the vote of the NEC.


WG: would seem a better way to do it


CP: that happens on other committees erm I assume that the only downside is the make up of the

NEC is probably too many people there reliant on it for their MEP postion.

WG: yeah


CP: it would be better once the MEP’s are out of the way, because..


WG: yeah


CP: then they might vote with their heart and conscience rather than how they are told to vote


WG: yeah


CP: okay well I just thought about that afterwards how much of rolls is he playing in this obviously


WG: you know in terms of what happened then that was simply you know Steve saw his opportunity

he got me to get somebody to have a look at your site and that was simply their report that was read
out, you know, I am not going to tell you who they are because they are still in the party, but I don’t
think they particularly had a grudge I think they were just doing what they were told, you know.

CP: right


WG: on the other hand clearly


CP: yes so he obviously portrayed it in a way,


WG: yeah


CP: the not that obviously just by him getting you to say that all the awful stuff had been deleted


WG: yeah


CP: then he used then he knew the fact that is wasn’t there in the first place


WG: yeah yeah


CP: Although it sound damming in front of the NEC, and in front of a disciplinary proceedings he

wouldn’t have got away with that, because I would have had witnesses there and evidence and gone
through everything bit by bit

WG: yeah


CP: it was like everything he threw at me at that meeting, erm from the thing about the what do you

call it, the rally in Boston, which he knew about, which had been passed by Paul, and the motion
which he told me to do exactly what I did do, and he knows he told me exactly what to do, and Piers
said the same erm and to throw all these things in it was obviously bazaar, I mean I should have had
a disciplinary action where I got a seven days notice where I could have took each but of evidence in
with me, to go through them

WG: yeah which is what Piers said isn’t it


CP: and that’s you know obviously he didn’t want that, because he thought he could actually con

peoples as a full NEC and twist the facts marginally enough to hit me with other stuff to make it, get
it passed.

WG: yeah


CP: through a disciplinary procedure he would need


WG: Katie is a bit more independent only a bit more but a bit more independent than the two of us


CP: yeah


WG: her view on Steve is he’s used to being the boss in his little agency where he was God, and he

has got that arrogance where it comes to that and he believes that you know that things should be
made to go his own way.

CP: regardless of how they are


WG: and you know like many people in the party he has an expectation that he’ll


Katie Snape: may just say something


WG: just a minute while I put it on Speaker yeah hold on


CP; Right

peerage

KS: hi Chris I have a theory, I kind of believe the conspiracy theory that Steve and Nigel are up for the


CP: yeah


KS; that the party will go then and the two of them will be in the House of Lords that’s all I have to

say

WG: it should be that the arrogance of being in charge to some extent makes him feel that he can

get away with anything, by shouting louder because he’s watched Nigel doing it for years and it has
worked well for Nigel

CP: yeah, it seems like he’s been playing the nice, nice policeman hard policeman in between


WG: yeah


CP: yet plays MR soppy happy go lucky but then just shouts every now an again in fact the actual

erm vote for the constitution on that weekend in Skegness when the Spring Conference was on,

WG: yeah


CP: erm I had not met anybody who had voted for it and we had a meeting at the had a meal an

Indian and it was 30 of us on the Saturday night

WG: yeah


CP: and half the table voted for it who were all, Tim Akars, Roger Bird the other half hadn’t they had

a meeting at the next day with 40 people nobody voted for it, and I have not met anybody since
who voted for it. So for the constitution to go through with a 96% vote it was more unbelievable to
say the least.

WG: yeah


CP: you just can’t believe it


WG: The things are just


CP; so you know whether they rigged it to a degree but then not a lot of people voted and that’s

why the constitution went through massively because they put so many votes in but obviously the
actual voting votes were less than they imagined

WG: yeah


CP; and that’s why it came out 96% because I have not met anybody yet who has voted for it apart

from 15 people sat around the table on the Saturday night.

WG: yep yep


CP: and it just goes when you go to previous NEC elections erm when I got elected Steves message

to me was, you can tell we don’t rig the elections because you’ve come top, and my answer Steve
was, well that doesn’t mean that you have not rigged it, I said you probably had rigged it but just
means that I am more popular than you thought I was,

WG: yeah yeah


CP: you know it wouldn’t surprise me that he’s not got 6 or 800 voting slips out there that they just

mysteriously put in every time.

WG: yeah yeah


CP: which is enough normally to top the balance of the scales


WG: yeah yeah


CP: yawning Sorry for troubling you Will, its er, I have heard about the peerage thing with Nigel and

I have heard the fact that we are supposed to be doing a pact with Tories in 2015.

WG: yeah


CP: which will kill the party


WG: yeah


CP: and there is no two ways about it anybody North of Watford won’t vote for us and


WG: and this is where it goes wrong for them I don’t think they necessarily have the power to do

such a thing

CP: they haven’t with a strong NEC, no, but if they have got an NEC of, you’ve got to look at what’s

happened with the national voting thing for the MEP selection

WG: yeah yea


CP: the reason they’ve got away with it because half the NEC have been looking to get on the MEP

band wagon not to push the region forward, just as a career opportunity and that that’s what’s
happened, they have got a lot of people there that have been looking for MEP election and so they
would sell their grandmother down the line for the ticket

WG: yes of course


CP: and that’s why the vote’s MP’s have been sat there happily voting along.


WG: yeah yeah of course


CP: so that’s what they are relying on is the complacent NEC that’s not gonna kick up a fuss


WG: yeah


CP: and that’s why three times its been on the NEC agenda about the coalition and three times Steve

has let it go off without a vote on it.

WG: yeah yeah


CP: erm and the same thing is at the NEC meeting in May when the actual MEP selection was

discussed and Steve quickly rushed through a list of names but it wasn’t put in front of people, that’s
when I stated quite clearly the fact that we shouldn’t have any paid employees as part of the
selection procedure and that’s including you Steve, and I said he stated he was on a long holiday
with nothing to do

WG: yes yes


CP; the reason he’s didn’t put the selection the selection and the assessment panel to the vote

because I said that as it had been agreed by people at my end of the table that he realised he
wouldn’t get away with it. But yet he has done it subsequently through the litigation by MIke
Nattrass,

WG: yeh


CP; he used that as a tool, to whip others into oh yes we will agree it or we will get an injunction


WG: yeah

CP; Never mind Will sorry for troubling you, I just thought about that afterwards last night so erm

obviously that was a big issue

WG; yes okay


CP; okay hopefully best of luck and I will meet you again in the future sometime when you get on

and get yourself sorted out

WG; yeah yeah cool cheers Bye


CP; Bye

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from Number Withheld phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded & leave a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE

 

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP:
http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

DO MAKE USE of LINKS

& >Right Side Bar<

& the >Left Side Bar<
& The >Top Bar< just below the web site title
>PAGES<

Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com

General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

TWITTER: Greg_LW

SKYPE:  GregL-W

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in EU, EUkip, UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Nigel Farage’s House Of Cards From The Inside

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 03/12/2014

Nigel Farage’s House Of Cards From The Inside
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Nigel Farage’s House Of Cards From The Inside is just another analysis of Ukip’s crass ineptitude & dishonesty

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
you will have noted by now that The Times is featuring Ukip and sadly; based on information from their contacts, which has by-passed Ukip’s weak yet aggresive press office with its grossly over paid ineptitude; The Times has found its way to much of the truth.
The Times is doing to Ukip what it does to the two main parties which is calling them to account and exposing their inadequacies and internal squabbles, incompetencies and corruptions – Ukip is learning the truth of my oft made warning ‘the higher up the tree the monkey climbs the more you see its @rse’.
Naturally Ukip is likely to fall back on the lame excuses that were so often used by their associates in the BNP ‘they’re picking on us because we are being so effective and threatening the establishment’!
This is palpable rubbish, what is happening is Ukip is experiencing the true scrutiny briefly, which front line politics constantly experiences.
I believe this exposure will probably culminate in either a major revalation either on Saturday or Sunday and then it is just a matter of whether Ukip is considered of adequate consequence to be kept in the public eye, where scrutiny will continue, just as it is experienced by the Tories and Labour or they slide into the obscurity they have earned having peaked.
It seems likely that Ukip will have to fall back on the shoddy journalism and desperate scribblings of the milti millionaire publisher Richard Desmond who cut his publishing teeth in the trash end of the magazine trade with publications that pandered to gossip and populist light weight like OK and New!
He then moved into adult TV (a EUphemism for soft porn) with Television X and Red Hot TV – moving on to such inglorious titles as The Daily Star and The Express – the latter being Ukip’s comic of choice with its corrupt standards of journalism and unrelenting yet undeclared bias!
With The Express Ukip has found itself with a partnership in light weight publicity and low grade press to match its standards and its hugely over salaried and over blown press office.
To quote their ever intellectual EU Press Officer Herman Kelly’s recent erudity ‘when you sleep with dogs you wake with fleas’ unoriginal I know but a measure of the competence and style of Ukip’s bullying and corrupt press office – a team who can best be judged by the paucity of publicity Ukip recieves, or ever has received over the years, which is of consequence or gravitas in publications of repute and stature.
For now just consider the facts proffered by The Times, all be it hidden behind their paywall, sometyhing of a saving grace for Ukip as few of their followers will thus learn the truth!

Inside Nigel’s house of cards

Nigel Farage
Times photographer, Jack Hill
  • Nigel Farage at Rochester UKIP HQ
    Nigel Farage Times photographer, Jack Hill

Nigel Farage is trying to create a professional party from a ragtag group more accustomed to setting the world to rights over pints of real ale

As the sun rose over Clacton in the hours after Ukip secured its first elected MP, Nigel Farage predicted that his Eurosceptic party could hold the balance of power at the next election.

Before setting its sights on May, Ukip is grappling with a more mundane challenge.

Mr Farage is trying to create a professional party from a ragtag group of veteran members more accustomed to setting the world to rights over pints of real ale than the strict discipline of modern politics.

Last May, Ukip moved into a new Mayfair office, formerly the home of Boris Johnson’s mayoralty campaign team, after it was offered rent-free by Andrew Reid, a solicitor.

Three months later, amid concerns that staff were running amok, Lisa Duffy, Ukip’s director, was sent in to sort things out.

In a confidential report presented to Ukip’s governing committee, Ms Duffy wrote that she had gone to the offices on party business “only to be embarrassed about the lack of cleanliness, silliness and lack of organisation and lack of people in offices”.

Describing how she had spent the first few days setting the office up in a “professional manner”, Ms Duffy said she had moved desks and organised a holiday rota which “identified that the following week we would have had no press officers if I hadn’t actioned this”.

She also removed “unprofessional” material from walls and hand written signs.

A former office worker said these included a “c*** of the week” award which was given to “whichever journalist had been the most critical that week”.

A hand-drawn picture of Mr Farage surrounded by hearts was pinned on the wall, alongside an “I love egg mayonnaise sandwiches” sign posted by Alexandra Phillips, a press officer.

Ms Duffy’s intervention in Ukip’s London offices came a few days after another attempt to professionalise the party had ended in disaster.

Will Gilpin, a former RAF pilot, began work in the £72,000-a-year post of chief executive in December 2012 but was sacked in August 2013.

He wrote to one member of the executive: “I’m afraid I came to the role in the belief it was actually a chief executive they were after, rather than chairman’s assistant.”

“In response to me saying I’m unhappy with how things are going I have been sacked. It’s a shame I wasn’t able to bring in the much needed modernizations, but it’s up to the leadership of course.”

The national executive committee (NEC) also had disputes over another key appointment, leaked emails reveal.

In May last year, Tim Aker, a political campaigner and former researcher, was put forward for the £62,000 post of head of policy.

William Dartmouth, a Ukip MEP, wrote to members of the NEC complaining that Mr Aker was being offered as the sole candidate and that he had been “directly concerned and therefore partly responsible for the embarrassment of the 2010 Ukip general election manifesto”.

Mr Farage, who backed Mr Aker, has previously disowned the 2010 manifesto as “drivel” and claimed he had never read it.

Mr Dartmouth said the manifesto was “electorally toxic” and that Mr Aker’s involvement with it should be a “total disqualification”.

Andrew Moncreiff, a member of Ukip’s executive committee, wrotethat Mr Aker was “harmless enough but thoroughly lightweight and has done virtually nothing for the party”.

Mr Aker did not reply to a request for comment.

.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in Nigel FARAGE, UKIP, William Dartmouth | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Cllr. Chris Paine’s Side of the Corruption & Fight with Farage’s UKIP!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 23/04/2014

Cllr. Chris Paine’s Side of the Corruption & Fight with Farage’s UKIP!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Cllr. Chris Paine’s Side of the Corruption & Fight with Farage’s UKIP, exposing YET AGAIN how UKIP Leadership rigs the selection processes!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
THE FOLLOWING IS A STATEMENT FROM
CHRIS PAIN
Do you know why I was expelled from UKIP?
I was a long standing party member for 8 years and a hard working loyal activist, achieving some of the best results for UKIP in any General Election. These efforts were instrumental in getting 16 County Councillors elected, thus becoming the official opposition on the Council, after beating the Tories in 9 out of 11 seats in the Boston/Skegness constituency. The prospect of this being UKIP’s first parliamentary seat was very high. Why would the leadership throw this away?
Everything enclosed in this email is backed up by evidence.
I have been silent until now, but I believe it is time that all UKIP members were made aware of the real reason that I was expelled, rather than the ‘spin’ and lies that have come from certain persons within the party. When you consider the entire evidence, take into consideration that Nigel Farage has now stated different versions why I was thrown out of the party: for racialism which he did on prime TV, because of the Derek Clark incident.
At no time did any of the panel read the evidence that Nigel Farage, Steve Crowther were involved in removing me from the party as early as May 2013, because it incriminated the top people in the party. Matthew Richardson has also played a part in driving me out of the party.
He is the UKIP Party Secretary and Director whilst also being the YBF Executive Director. If you look at their website you will find the following information, quote “YBF is a British conservative not-for-profit training, YBF enjoys close links with the British Conservative Party.” Unquote
HOW THINGS HAPPENED IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER THE FIRST THING Nigel Farage refused to attend the East Midland Training Conference at Skegness in 2013
BOSTON/SKEGNESS PARTY POLITICAL CANDIDATE (PPC) Lisa Duffy, Party Director, tried to take away my PPC for Boston/Skegness at the NEC meeting on the 6th May, 2013. She stated that she and Steve Crowther hadn’t been notified of the hustings. I proved that I had been adopted by producing copy emails which had been sent to them both, by Don Ransome Regional Organiser, giving them the required notice.
It was discovered that Don Ransome, UKIP’s paid Regional Organiser, had wiped the emails from his computer. (The Regional Organiser and his wife have had a legal letter to stop them spreading lies and defaming my character.) The NEC voted unanimously in favour of my adoption.
RACIST COMMENTS At the end of May last year my Facebook was cloned and was posted to ‘Hope Not Hate,’ who immediately forwarded it to the Sunday Mirror. Monday 3rd June, 2013 at the NEC monthly meeting, I was questioned about the posting. I produced several hundred Facebook members’ statements, confirming that they had never seen anything racist or untoward on my site, or elsewhere attributed towards me.
These people were linked to me personally so that any post I made was automatically posted to their computers. I had letters from friends of all nationalities stating that they had known me for years and that I was not racist. Steve Crowther presented a case that these posts had been on my Facebook page and been deleted. I stated quite categorically that the posts had never been on my site at anytime.
The following week, I explained to Steve Crowther that I had evidence, produced by an IT expert, which confirmed that the racialist comments were never on my Facebook. Steve Crowther maintained that it would not make a difference. I told him of course it did, as obviously, if they were never there in the first place, then how could I have deleted them. In addition Steve Crowther advised that I had never reported the incident to the police.
This was reported to the Skegness Police Force and ultimately passed on to Action Fraud – Crime Reference Number NFRC130500251709 that refers. There was also a full CID investigation into the incident. Mr Crowther, with his ulterior motivies, persuaded the NEC that I was a liar, with his own spin on the situation, without any actual evidence. I was suspended from the NEC for three months pending the outcome of the police investigation of which I was cleared.
BEHIND THE SCENES
Steve Crowther sent an email instructing Pete Reeves to remove me as leader of the UKIP Lincolnshire
County Councillors, despite which four attempts were made and failed before Steve Crowther finally
suspended me from the party. Two ex Conservatives, Victoria Ayling and Robin Hunter-Clarke, were
allowed into the party and became elected councillors for UKIP in Lincolnshire, being pushed to the
forefront by the leadership.
These persons subsequently received an email from Steve Crowther advising
them of my suspension. No other UKIP Councillor has received such an email. Victoria Ayling and Robin
Hunter Clark then approached the Chief Executive of Lincolnshire County Council to persuade him to
remove me from my UKIP Group, at the same time disrupting the Group, making constant attempts to
remove me as Leader.
They had already been removed as Deputy Leaders, by unanimous vote, because
of their continuous disruption and none attendance. They went on to break our groups constitution by
organising a separate meeting in respect of which only Councillors of their choosing were notified. All this
time false information was being leaked to the press.
In June 2013, all elected Councillors were invited to Brussels. John Beaver was directly involved
in a conversation with Nigel Farage during which Nigel stated that Chris Pain was no longer in
favour with the party and would soon be excluded,
FLAWED MEP SELECTION PROCESS
On the 18th August 2013, I forwarded an email which had been sent to UKIP MEP Mike Nattrass.
In this email Steve Crowther states:- “This NEC notes the technical procedural failure in relation to
the appointment of the selection panels for the selection of MEPs.
Further notes that the process was carried out by the following people acting as a de facto selection panel.” (De Facto means as a fact authority being exercised or an entity acting as if it had authority, even though the legal requirements
have not been met.)
Doug Denny stated: “The appointment of independent persons was to be by the delegated, by an
independent sub-committee of the NEC, not by the full NEC, nor by any individual.
At no time was Steve Crowther given delegated powers by the NEC to appoint these people. There
is nowhere in the minutes to show he had these delegated powers conferred. The selection
procedure using delegated people for the personal assessments is, I believe, seriously flawed,
probably fatally so.
The people for the selection / assessment panel were appointed by Steve Crowther without
approval of the NEC members in a vote. The whole procedure is therefore flawed if this is correct.
The MEP selection process was changed by Steve Crowther against the wishes of the Regional
Chairmen and party Activists.”
CONSPIRACY – WILL GILPIN – EX CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF UKIP
The intention to take me out of the party was confirmed in a (recorded) conversation with Will Gillpin, UKIP
Chief Executive Officer and also several other senior UKIP members.
See verbatim conversation below:-
Chris Pain: “Well did Steve have any conversations with you or anything separately or?”
Will Gilpin: “I’ll give you an honest answer which is I can’t remember the details, but I was well
aware that Steve Crowther had a lot of activity towards you and had made it very clear that he
would like to get you out of the party, and would do whatever he could to achieve that.”
Will Gilpin: “Do you remember when you arranged your conference; you invited me and Katie to
speak at it, or me to speak at it. I turned you down because Steve Crowther gave me a direct order
that I wasn’t to attend, and that I wasn’t to have anything to do with you, and given that he was
paying my pay cheque went along. Just because, Steve Crowther’s argument to me was basically
that the conference was a project designed to get you elected, and as we didn’t want to get you
elected, we had to do our best to not support it”
Chris Pain: “ I mean was it ever said why he wanted me out the party, has he ever dropped that
reason out, or…? Is it down to Nigel or…?
Will Gillpin: “Yeah, it’s all been partly down to Nigel. I think it’s because you’re pushy and Nigel
doesn’t like anyone pushy because they might go for the leadership at some point.”
*The lack of attendance of UKIP speakers caused the Gala Night, Sunday training and PPC assessment
day to be cancelled. We were also fined for late cancellation. Although Steve Crowther’s actions hampered
the weekend, the Conference day was a success.
MY RESIGNATION FROM THE NEC 2nd September 2013, I resigned from the NEC.
I decided I could no longer rubber stamp what I deemed to be a flawed MEP selection process.
I could not condone the way the NEC business is conducted i.e. in total secrecy, not informing the members of its actions, or how people vote.
I believe this to be totally undemocratic and with this in mind I typed out my resignation from the NEC.
I also on this date registered my disapproval re Steve Crowther’s lack of integrity and the flawed MEP selection process.
I presented the transcript of Will Gilpin’s recording to the NEC. Despite this Matthew Richardson and Jonathan Arnott refused to allow the recording be played, stating that I could forward the recording to NEC members, advising that my complaint against Steve Crowther, re the flawed MEP selection process and the email that I sent to Mike Nattrass, would be looked at during the NEC meeting in October as it was classed as not urgent.
SUSPENSION Friday the 6th September after producing this information I was suspended from the party on the following by Steve Crowther using his emergency disciplinary powers, and referring to the Will Gilpin recorded conversation.
At this stage I must point out that as an NEC Member, (which means I was a Director of UKIP Ltd), I was entitled to record any evidence of wrong-doing within the party/company. In addition it is not illegal to record a conversation in one’s own home.
EXPULSION 11th September I was expelled from the group of Councillors. 5 UKIP long standing members supported me as they were aware of previous events, which had lead to the expulsion.
12th September Notice of a disciplinary hearing to be held on the 18th September. My solicitor chased for case documents from UKIP and this appeared over the weekend. This left only 48 hours which to avail myself of all the allegations. My legal representation and I questioned the makeup of the panel, which could hardly have been classed as impartial.
THE HEARING I was able to prove at the hearing that all the statements and accusations made against me were false. The only query involved an apparent difference in the structure of emails, surrounding the attachments, which appeared to the amateur, to have been presented in different ways.
Being untrained in IT myself, I was unable at the time to produce an answer. (After, consulting with an experienced technician later, it appears that these differences relate solely to the type of systems in operation in each case.)
Apart from the computer issue I answered all accusations truthfully and with a clear conscience, despite which I was still expelled from the party.
The primary issue at the hearing was the forwarding of the email and recording. I produced evidence that Mrs Pain Senior sent the recording and email’s, whilst I was not in the office and was on site at a Planning meeting.
Matthew Richardson stated at the end of the hearing: “ well we’ve explained in the sense that we agree with the Chairman’s reasoning, that the dissemination of this material is damaging to the party and erm, as a result we have no choice but to expel you”.
At the hearing it was stated by Matthew Richardson that he would be recording the hearing and provide a copy of the recording and the transcript. No recording was provided and the transcript was eventually sent. I can prove the transcript is both inaccurate and has been altered.
UKIP CONFERENCE At the UKIP conference, three UKIP Lincolnshire Councillors were discussing the situation regarding me when Nigel Farage walked into the room.
He said nothing for a while then said see verbatim conversation below:-
Nigel Farage: “Pain had caused trouble for the party for a long time” Alan Jesson: “What do you mean by that” Nigel Farage: “He had made allegations against Derek Clark MEP, and that he, Pain, was a troublemaker and not to be trusted.” Alan Jesson: “What about all the good work Chris has done and Lincolnshire needed Chris.” Nigel Farage: “UKIP is bigger than Pain, and Pain was not coming back into the party.” Alan Jesson: “Chris will be appealing”
Nigel Farage got mad and started banging his fists on the table
Nigel Farage: “I have no influence over the appeal, but I tell you now that Pain is not coming back into the party”
I need to clarify, at this stage, that the East Midlands Committee asked Derek Clark to stand down as chairman. I have EMCC minutes to prove that Charles Swaby had raised the issue of Derek Clark, as per NEC rules that he wasn’t entitled to be Chairman. There were several discrepancies over Derek Clark’s OLAF investigation where he was found guilty.
He had to repay over £30,000.00 back to the EU because of misuse of his allowances. He lied to the committee regarding this fact. There was also his involvement in the Leicester by election and flawed Mayoral candidate. The vote was unanimous by the East Midlands Committee to remove Derek.
Derek’s response was to disband the EMCC committee at the start of the meeting, without the committee’s prior knowledge.
SUPPORTING COUNCILLORS EXPELLED The 5 Councillors that supported me had an email confirming that they had done nothing wrong and were ‘in good standing with the party’. Matthew Richardson stated he would come to Lincolnshire to resolve the issue, he never came.
These Councillors were subsequently expelled from UKIP for supposedly forming a political party, which was proved at their hearing, not to be the case and confirmed by Lincolnshire County Council and Lincolnshire Echo.
They were promised notification by December after my appeal had been heard, about their situation. To date they have heard nothing from the party.
APPEAL HEARING The panel at my Appeal hearing should have been unbiased but two out of the three who sat on the panel were EFD employees, paid and controlled by Nigel Farage.
Unable to attend the hearing due to Council commitments, I had asked for 3 alternative dates to be set, once the Data information that I had requested had been received. Jonathan Arnott stated if I couldn’t attend on the date they had set, the hearing would go ahead without me. This breaks UKIP’s constitution that states that the ‘appellant’ should be present, and also breaks the case of natural justice in the court of law. Data Request information has still not been forth coming to date.
After reading the Appeals panel conclusion I once more discovered that Steve Crowther had lied to the panel. The panel stated that I was expelled because of the email that was sent to Mike Nattrass, which means I was thrown out of UKIP for whistle blowing on the flawed MEP selection process.
I have evidence which shows that Matthew Richardson has instructed the NEC to alter previous NEC minutes to suit Steve Crowthers actions.
One thing for consideration is that I was anti any pre election packs between UKIP and the Conservative party. This is where UKIP members would stand down in safe Tory seats. Nine regional chairmen had supported me in favour of regional MEP selections. I would not betray members or the British public.
If you need any proof of all of the above please ask.
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

HS2 & More Hypocrisy From The UKIP Fuhrer

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 02/10/2013

HS2 & More Hypocrisy From The UKIP Fuhrer
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

HS2 & More Hypocrisy From The UKIP Fuhrer!
A Guest Posting with my comments!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.

More Hypocrisy From The UKIP Fuhrer.

The following is taken directly from UKIP’s 2010 manifesto. It appears in the transport section.

“Invest in three new 200mph plus high-speed rail lines including a new line between London and Newcastle with a spur to Manchester, a London-Bristol-Exeter line and a linking route via Birmingham.”

Note please the words new, high-speed, and link.

So that would be HS2, then.

But now, of course, that others have taken the lead and roused opposition, it becomes prudent for the little man in the silly suit to pretend that he was against it all along. In fact, he has even claimed that UKIP is the only party to have opposed HS2. 

Calling for it in a recent manifesto is a funny way to oppose it!

Or perhaps they thought that nobody would notice!

As posted on Junius at CLICK HERE

Hi,

I think it was only their turn coat Peer and at the time Party leader Malcolm Lord Pearson, who has clearly not read the manifesto.

In fact he didn’t even know his party’s aim was to oppose the Tories against whom he urged a number of UKIP candidates to stand down!

That also was not in the manifesto – though I see it is now mooted by Nigel Farage clearly his sad puppet Tim Acker has no say as Policy Director just as Will Gilpin was sabotaged by bad leadership and bad practice!

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

.
There is of course no sound or viable case for HS2 which is a staggeringly costly vanity project.

The cheaper and far more sensible solution is to set out earlier if you wish tyo reach your destination sooner!

It is also well worth noting that railways have throughout their history syphoned work and people OUT of the provinces and rural areas to ever larger conurbations. Likewise jobs!

Further it is self evident that, by casting ones mind back a like time and noting the intervening progress, the country and technology will be incredibly different by the time HS2 was running if vanity prevails and it goes ahead.

Video conferencing may well have become a three dimensional experience by then and the need for travel will thus diminish considerably.

To liken rail as a service in Britain to that of continental countries is just dishonest as it is NOT the cost of transport which is the problem on rail it is the cost of handling! Britain is a tiny island by comparison with continental EUrope where goods and people can be transported 1,000s of miles with only one loading amnd unloading cost whereas in Britain few journeys exceed 150 miles and most are under 100 miles for that same handling cost.

No wonder our railways are not viable they are and will remain excessively expensive!

There is in fact a very sound argument for dismantling our railways as then commuting would become all but unviable and businesses would decentralise spreading jobs and wealth more widely and evenly, stabilising these United Kingdoms as a balanced area and pandering to the green lobby and the warmists by reducing the need for travel and the polluting influence of trains!

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

What Excuse Will UKIP Use Next to Suspend Chris Pain?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 11/09/2013

What Excuse Will UKIP Use Next to Suspend Chris Pain?
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

What Excuse Will UKIP Leadership Use Next to Suspend Councillor Chris Pain, leader of UKIP on Lincolnshire County Councill?

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

itg is interesting to note that only aday or so after this website informed readers that C hris pain was no longer under investigation by the police with regard to racist comments on his facebook site that having been suspended whilst the investigation was underway he was now being suspended for an entirely different reason!

This does seem to add much credibility to the MP3 recording of the conversation between the resigned CEO of UKIP Will Gilpin & Chris Pain, the text of which was published on this blog CLICK HERE.

So it seems that UKIP’s leadership have changed their story and original excuse for suspending Chris Pain from his web comments to the later version, which endorses the MP3 comments of Will Gil;pin, and cites a fall out with Nigel Farage’s placeman Steve Crowther!

Can you imagine what a ghastly place britain would be to live in if UKIP ever gained real power – endless posturing and witch hunts as its various petty luminaries vied for attention and status on the gravy train, at the expense of democracy and morality and in denial of ethics and principles!

Little wonder so many of their more odious supporters are too ashamed to use their real names and hide behind anonimity and foolish names to peddle their filth, their racism, their anti homosexuality and their vile prejudices.

In fact although UKIP is more of a centralised cult than a party and Nigel Farage is their only perfgormer of any merit, as shown by his efforts in the EU Parliament where he sings most ably in return for his luxury seat on the gravy tyrain as shown by:
CLICK HERE and also HERE

It is unfortunate that so very very few ever watch or listen to Nigel Farage;s more competent speeches and it is clear that UKIP, for all its huff and puff is little more than a one man band when it comes to decision making the centralisation of authoritarian control and the delivery of anything passing for a competent speech.

Imagine how much UKIP could have achieved if it had put a fraction of its energy into silencing its odious and self serving staff and the claque who make such fools of themselves and the party on the internet so damagingly and had for the last 20 years concentrated on training a team of well informed spokesmen to show the benefits for Britain when we Leave-The-EU and seeking to show in every town, city and county council just how every item of consequential policy and expenditure and every petty fogging bit of regulation was a matter controlled without democratic imput of any meaningful degree in the centralised EU bureaucracy!

As it is, due to apauling leadership and a total lack of training, gravitas, a plan, strategy, tactics or even a clear Exit & Survival Strategy to Leave-The_EU – they have due to this a 20 year track record of abject failure in domestic politics and even now as they pander to the lowest common denominator of populism exploiting racism, immigration, xenophobia and anti homosexuality they have still failed to get anywhere near getting an MP elected and have a risible 140 or so elected Councillors out of some 8,000 available seats!

UKIP under its p[resent leadership and structure is beyond any doubt amongst the informed – UNFIT FOR PURPOSE to lead Britain to Leave-The-EU.

One performing monkey, performing mostly in obscurity clearly does little to Leave-The-EU without a competent organ grinder the organ itself lies trashed in the gutter as tyhe higher up the tree the monkey climbs the more you see its @rse – as has been shown by the welter of bad publicity the cult itself has received!

Lincolnshire UKIP councillor Chris Pain removed as group leader

Councillor Chris Pain
Chris Pain was elected to Lincolnshire County Council in May along with 15 other UKIP councillors

A councillor suspended by UKIP has been removed as leader of the party’s group on Lincolnshire County Council.

Chris Pain said he had been suspended from UKIP because of a “serious issue” between himself and national chairman Steve Crowther.

Nine of Lincolnshire’s UKIP councillors have now signed a letter to the county council’s chief executive saying Mr Pain has been removed from their group.

A national UKIP spokesman would not comment on why he had been suspended.

He said: “Chris Pain has been suspended under the emergency powers of the chairman of UKIP.

“It would be wrong and unfair to say anything more about the case before the committee has heard the evidence against Mr Pain and his defence.”

UKIP gained 16 seats on Lincolnshire County Council in May, causing the Conservatives to lose overall control and form a coalition with the Liberal Democrats and several Independents.

Racism allegations Mr Pain continues to be a councillor for Wainfleet and Burgh, and he told BBC Radio Lincolnshire “there is no way I would desert the voters”.

“I put a complaint against UKIP national chairman Steve Crowther which might be subject of legal action and I can’t discuss that any further at the moment,” he said.

“It’s just a serious issue between myself and Steve Crowther.”

Councillor Colin Mair, who represents Tattershall Castle, has been appointed acting UKIP leader in Lincolnshire.

Mr Pain was investigated by Lincolnshire Police for alleged racist remarks posted on Facebook, but police said on Monday no action would be taken against him.

Tony McArdle, chief executive of Lincolnshire County Council, said: “We have today received notification from a majority of the members of the UKIP group to the effect that Councillor Chris Pain is not now a member of that group and consequently not its leader.

“As from today, Councillor Colin Mair will be acting as leader of the UKIP group.”

To see the original article CLICK HERE
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 24/08/2013

 

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR!
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Those Chosen to be UKIP MEP candidates SO FAR! Despite a poll of members of UKIP yet to come the final list will be drawn up at the last minute next year in accord with the wishes of Nigel Farage (See UKIP Constitution!)!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

although UKIP presented its list of candidate MEPs on 17-Aug-2013 it seemed so irrelevant that I have only just got around to publishing it!

UKIP just published a tedious and uninformative list, almost as if they wished to hide the facts from their beguilled followers & the claque, so I have picked up a few more facts for you!

MEP candidates

 

 Category: MEP Candidates
 Published on Saturday, 17 August 2013 06:51
The following people are our candidates for MEP selection and will be voted for by the membership. Ballot papers go out at the end of August an the voting closes on September 20.
England
Nigel Farage
Paul Nuttall
Janice Atkinson
Patrick O’Flynn
Stuart Agnew
Ray Finch
Jonathan Arnott
Roger Helmer
Paul Oakley
Gerard Batten
Godfrey Bloom
Margot Parker
Tim Aker
Andrew Smith
Michael McManus
Jill Seymour
Gawain Towler
Julia Reid
Louise Bours
Michael Heaver
Andrew McNeilis
Jane Collins
John Tennant
Phil Henrick
Jonathan Bullock
Diane James
Jason Smith
Bill Etheridge
Amjad Bashir
Anthony Brown
Elizabeth Jones
Shneur Odze
Tony McIntyre
James Carver
William Dartmouth
Lawrence Webb
Keith Crawford
Alastair McFarlane
Steven Woolfe
Michael  Wrench
Michael Green
Peter Whittle
Robert Smith
Lee Slaughter
Nigel Jones
Mike Hookem
Peter Harper
Simon Strutt
Simon Noble
Andy Monk
Patricia Culligan
Alan Stevens
Mick McGough
Lyndon Jones
Donna Edmunds
Barry Mahoney
Barry Cooper
Nigel Wickens
Gary Shores
Richard Elvin

Scotland

DavidCoburn
Mike Scott-Hayward
Christopher Monckton
Otto Inglis
Paul Henke
Malcolm Macaskill
Ross Durance
Steve McKeane
Kevin Newton

Wales

Nathan Gill
James Cole
Gareth Dunn
David Rowlands
Caroline Jones
Martyn Ford
Brian Morris

Let us break this down into EU regions to make it more intelligible.

Though even this listing is before a NATIONAL vote on Regional issues!

It is before Nigel Farage through his muppets & puppets on HIS engineered NEC has parachuted in a few more drinking buddies and chums at the last minute and selected the order HE wants for each region – as is his perogative as a result of the all too apparently rigged vote on Constitutional amendments to make him effectively the dictator in his very own centralised and authoritarian party where Libertarian would seem to interpret as libertine or louche!

Eastern – shortlist
Patrick O’Flynn
Stuart Agnew
Tim Aker
Andrew Smith
Michael Heaver
Andy Monk
Mick McGough
East Midlands – shortlist
Roger Helmer
Margot Parker
Jonathan Bullock
Barry Mahoney
Nigel Wickens
London – shortlist
Paul Oakley
Gerard Batten
Andrew McNeilis
Anthony Brown
Elizabeth Jones
Lawrence Webb
Alastair McFarlane
Peter Whittle
North East – shortlist
Jonathan Arnott
John Tennant
Richard Elvin
North West – shortlist
Paul Nuttall
Michael McManus
Louise Bours
Shneur Odze
Steven Woolfe
Lee Slaughter
Peter Harper
Simon Noble
South East – shortlist
Nigel Farage
Janice Atkinson
Ray Finch
Diane James
Nigel Jones
Simon Strutt
Patricia Culligan
Alan Stevens
Donna Edmunds
Barry Cooper
South West – shortlist
Gawain Towler
Julia Reid
Tony McIntyre
William Dartmouth
Keith Crawford
Robert Smith
West Midlands – shortlist
Jill Seymour
Phil Henrick
Bill Etheridge
James Carver
Michael Wrench
Michael Green
Lyndon Jones
Yorks & N Lincs – shortlist
Godfrey Bloom
Jane Collins
Jason Smith
Amjad Bashir
Mike Hookem
Gary Shores
Scotland – shortlist
David Coburn
Mike Scott-Hayward
Christopher Monckton
Otto Inglis
Paul Henke
Malcolm Macaskill
Ross Durance
Steven McKeane
Kevin Newton
Wales – shortlist
Nathan Gill
James Cole
Gareth Dunn
David Rowlands
Caroline Jones
Martyn Ford
Brian Morris

Lack lustre and bereft of gravirtas or character as the list may be and with several notable individuals notable for their ignorance, ill manners, temper tantrums, stupidity and either alcohol or sexual abuses and perversions:

Let us make the list even more intelligible with the actual results  (marks) apportioned at the interview/selection stage!

Eastern – shortlist
Patrick O’Flynn – 87
Stuart Agnew – 86
Tim Aker – 81
Andrew Smith – 81
Michael Heaver – 78
Andy Monk – 71
Mick McGough – 70

East Midlands – shortlist
Roger Helmer – 85
Margot Parker – 81
Jonathan Bullock – 77
Barry Mahoney – 69
Nigel Wickens – 68
London – shortlist
Paul Oakley – 83
Gerard Batten – 82
Andrew McNeilis – 78
Anthony Brown – 75
Elizabeth Jones – 75
Lawrence Webb – 74
Alastair McFarlane – 74
Peter Whittle – 72
North East – shortlist
Jonathan Arnott – 85
John Tennant – 78
Richard Elvin – 67
North West – shortlist
Paul Nuttall – 89
Michael McManu – 80s
Louise Bours – 79
Shneur Odze – 75
Steven Woolfe – 73
Lee Slaughter – 72
Peter Harper – 71
Simon Noble – 71
South East – shortlist
Nigel Farage – 97
Janice Atkinson – 88
Ray Finch – 85
Diane James – 76
Nigel Jones – 72
Simon Strutt – 71
Patricia Culligan – 71
Alan Stevens – 70
Donna Edmunds – 70
Barry Cooper – 69
South West – shortlist
Gawain Towler – 80
Julia Reid – 79
Tony McIntyre – 75
William Dartmouth – 75
Keith Crawford – 74
Robert Smith – 72
West Midlands – shortlist
Jill Seymour – 80
Phil Henrick – 78
Bill Etheridge – 76
James Carver – 75
Michael Wrench – 72
Michael Green – 72
Lyndon Jones – 72
Yorks & N Lincs – shortlist
Godfrey Bloom – 81
Jane Collins – 78
Jason Smith – 76
Amjad Bashir – 76
Mike Hookem – 72
Gary Shores – 68
Scotland – shortlist
David Coburn – 75
Mike Scott-Haywa – 75rd
Christopher Monckton = 73
Otto Inglis – 73
Paul Henke – 70
Malcolm Macaskill – 66
Ross Durance – 63
Steven McKeane – 62
Kevin Newton – 56
Wales – shortlist
Nathan Gill – 83
James Cole – 79
Gareth Dunn – 76
David Rowlands – 73
Caroline Jones – 69
Martyn Ford – 69
Brian Morris – 63

Already the controversy rages with a very acrimonious series of comments and media coverage of  the rejected James Delingpole,

A Courtcase has been threatened by the deeply disturbed & disturbing Mike Nattrass ( CLICK HERE )who clearly wants to see his loss of credibility escalate and huge eventual costs when he loses his no hope action (as he lost when he issued writs against The Times but was forced to withdraw when he saw their evidence!).

Then of course there was coverage in many papers such as:

The fruitcake test: UKIP candidates face psychometric testing before being selected …but Godfrey ‘Bongo’ Bloom passed

  • Personality quiz used to check the honesty and reliability of politicians
  • Media skills, public speaking and manifesto knowledge also tested
  • Godfrey Bloom who complained about aid to ‘Bongo Bongo land’ passed
  • But another MEP Mike Nattrass failed to make the grade
  • Tough regime designed to prevent repeat of local elections embarrassment

By Matt Chorley, Mailonline Political Editor

|

‘A ‘fruitcake test’ has been used by the UK Independence Party to uncover unsuitable characters who might embarrass the party.Psychometric tests were used to analyse the personalities, reliability and honesty of more than 300 people wanting to run in next year’s European elections.

Experts were called in to prevent a repeat of May’s local elections when UKIP candidates were accused of sexism, racism and homophobia.

But one candidate who passed with flying colours was Godfrey Bloom, the sitting MEP who last week railed against Britain giving aid to ‘Bongo Bongo land’.

Pass: UKIP's Godfrey Bloom cleared the party's psychometric testing, but last week caused a political storm after complaining about British aid being sent to Bongo Bongo land

Pass: UKIP’s Godfrey Bloom cleared the party’s psychometric testing, but last week caused a political storm after complaining about British aid being sent to Bongo Bongo land

UKIP leader Nigel Farage ordered a shake-up of the party selection process to weed out people with views which risked living up to David Cameron’s infamous claim that the party was a ‘bunch of fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’.

A professional recruitment company was hired to oversee the process, ahead of elections to the European Parliament in May 2014.

To read the rest of the article CLICK HERE

I just love the picture of Bloom looking as barking mad as he clearly is – iresponsible to the last and seemingly due to his hold over Nigel Farage not only out of control but beyond discipline, whether urinating in hotel plant pots, heckling as a guest (on behalf of UKIP voters) at a Mansion House function, being arrested for copulating with a black prostitute on the bonnet of a car in a Brussels street, defaming women or abusing foreigners it rather shows the idiotic inadequacy of Psychometric testing to eliminate fruit cakes and liabilities.

What next will the Farage Party sink to, ouija boards, grapho analysis, crystal balls, astrology and Mystic Meg to make their decisions!

It is bad enough having elected politicians who are not up to the job and spend £Millions on so called consultants to advise them how to do the job for which we pay them but imagine if UKIP were to be elected somewhere one could expect them to squander money on chums with jobs as Tarot Card readers, Rorschach testers and divinets – clearly they can’t even manage basic interviews!

At least we haven’t seen the likes of Annabelle Fuller posting confidential videos on You Tube to try to fiddle the results this time SO FAR! Thus causing genuine Court cases and the resignation of UKIP’s chairman as unwilling to go on telling lies for Nigel Farage to protect his doxies!

Little wonder that Will Gilpin quit the job of CEO, I’m astonished he took so long to realise he would be undermined at every opposrtunity by the crass team of self serving clowns running UKIP!

The office witches & wizards put in place to rig the selection, when some were even standing themselves and most were appointed and salaried by Nigel Farage left Nigel Farage gently fuming in his own party, for which he has made up by promising that the liar and cheat Neil Hamilton, having missed out as a candidate will be given a plum job in the party – some fear it might be to replace Will Gilpin as CEO, others believe it will be as chairman of the party or party secretary!

UKIP with its gaggle of Old Etonian has neens at the top – Malcolm Pearson, Stuart Wheeler, Willaim Dartmouth, Hugh Williams & the rest) gets more like The Extremist Nutter Wing of The Tory Party!

In real terms it would be nice to believe that there was someone on their list of hopefuls whom someone of ethics, intelligence and gravitas might wish to represent them but sadly there isnt – they are by and large a dismal collection of self serving and odious political wanabes!

It was interesting to note that Will Gilpin’s comments on UKIP so closely resembled comments made on this and other bl;ogs that are desperately trying to work to see UKIP cleaned up and distanced from the garbage it has attracted with its dash for numbers rather than calliber, ability, commitment, patriotism, gravitas and responsible planned exit from The EU.

Nationalist, racist, yobbery and cowardly sneering by nebishes too ashamed of their behaviour to pout their name to it or dependent on abuse and insult unsubstantiated by facts, strategy, tactics or a plan serves the EUropSceptic cause ill.
It now starts to look as if UKIP is so unfit for purpose as to be iredeemable and more of a hinderance than a help to the cause! Hence when there has been a massive swing towards opposition to membership of The EU UKIP has failed abysmally to gather together those who would have naturally supported them.

Consider the words of Will Gilpin or for that matter the two untrustworthy liars Marta Andreasen & David Bannerman who despite their basic dishonesty did make many of the same comments! The idiotic comments of the likes of Bloom do much to prove the failure of UKIP as do the efforts of the idiotic in the party who try to sell the false premise thaty there is no such thing as bad publicity – well it seems without bad publicity UKIP doers little to attract good publicity!

Little wonder that UKIP has and continues to fail in domestic politics merely acting as the dustbin for protest votes in EU elections!
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Is This The Beginning Of The End of UKIP?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 21/08/2013

Is This The Beginning Of The End of UKIP?
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Is This The Beginning Of The End of UKIP? As the media exposes more and more of their crass and irresponsible behaviour and Nigel Farage tries to retrench by withrawing from the one job he CAN do to do one he is a proven failure at!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

I believe UKIP has been shown in its true colours – I dealt with much of what is revealed, yet again, at CLICK HERE

Nigel Farage wants Ukip to remain ‘a bunch of amateurs’

Ukip cannot become a professional political organisation that threatens the main parties because Nigel Farage refuses to give up power over it, the party’s former chief executive has said.

Chief executive of Ukip leaves after eight months in job

Mr Gilpin is said to have left on good terms 

Will Gilpin, who left his job this week, said that Mr Farage’s reluctance to accept professional management means Ukip will remain “a bunch of enthusiastic amateurs” who never fulfil their political potential.

Mr Gilpin, a former RAF pilot hired to professionalise Ukip, told theTelegraph that Mr Farage and his inner circle resisted his efforts to improve the party’s management and organisation.

Mr Gilpin is a former RAF Tornado pilot who then spent a decade working on major projects for organisations including BP and the Home Office.

He joined Ukip last year, and said he found a chaotic and disorganised party built around Mr Farage’s personality and whims.

“The thing I am most shocked by is that Nigel does his own thing without the party knowing where he is or what he is doing,” he said.

“Nigel is a great orator and a useful man for the party, but you have to use him in the scope of the wider organisation, rather than thinking ‘It’s all about Nigel’.

“Nigel would see the party as being about him. The party is structured like a flying wedge, pushing Nigel forward.”

Focusing on the 2015 general election, Mr Gilpin drew up plans for a standardised plan for election campaigns across the country, a “lessons learned” culture to ensure constant improvements, and a training regime for staff and candidates. He also planned a new structure to address the “big hole” in Ukip’s policy agenda.

Updating the party’s organisation would inevitably reduce Mr Farage’s influence over Ukip, Mr Gilpin said. “Nigel has to have less power. There is no way around it.”

What’s the biggest problem facing Ukip?
They’re not professional enoughThe fact that they’re not polished is an asset to them – it’s our voting system that limits themNigel Farage has too much control over the partyNigel Farage doesn’t have enough control over the partyThey don’t promote or value women

However, he said, he was blocked by Mr Farage and his circle, who resisted changes that would formalise party rules and make them more accountable to members.

“The leap from being a small group of people who have fun and do what they want to being a professional political party was too much,” Mr Gilpin said.

The refusal to change will limit Ukip’s ability to win Westminster seats in 2015, he said.

“The party has decided it likes things the way they are – so Ukip remains a bunch of enthusiastic amateurs having a good time, rather than the professional fighting team they could be,” he said.

“Individually, they have the skills to make that happen, but that means working together, and that is not really happening.”

In 2015, Mr Gilpin said, Mr Farage and his team will underperform.

“They might still win some seats – but not as many as they would if they organised and structured themselves to make the most of what they have,” he said.

Ukip sources have this week suggested that Mr Gilpin left because he was better suited to running IT systems than to a senior management role.

Mr Gilpin said he left the party because of Mr Farage’s refusal to implement his plans.

“I left by mutual agreement in response to my dissatisfaction at the fact I was not being allowed to do the job I was hired to do, which was to professionalise the party,” he said.

A Ukip spokesman said that Mr Gilpin “leaves with a great deal of warmth”.

He said: “He has worked very hard to provide the structures that he was asked to provide and which proved very uncomfortable to some in the party. He has been very successful and we wish him all the best.”

The party has not said who will replace Mr Gilpin. Rumours have suggested that Mr Farage is keen for the job to go to Neil Hamilton, the former Conservative MP who joined Ukip in 2002, but party sources insisted that was not the case.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

It becomes increasingly obvious that Farage’s party is unfit for office and is incompetent to manage its own affairs with any sense of responsibility let alone represent the voters in any position of authority.

One is forced to wonder if on top of the huge number of allegations of corruption and dishonesty that UKIP has been totally incapable of rebutting over many years and the many broken promises they have made to gain election (though largely they have failed to dupe the voters) could these latest revelations together with the all too plausible claims of rigging the selection of their list of staggeringly mediocre MEP candidates could this be the beginning of the end of the Farage cult?

That in the form of UKIP Farage’s cult is further demeaned by the crass comments of senior members like Godfrey Bloom, the appointment as a ‘fit individual’ of the liar & cheat Neil Hamilton to their NEC or the fantasist and thoroughly unpleasant and crass Mick McGough as an executive of the clique on the NEC – there are so very many examples that it merely becomes a bore to list them again when the articles regarding the departure of their CEO and the desperate efforts of Farage to try to hold the line, as shown in the media article below are so damaging.

Clearly yet another nail in the coffgin of any pretence that Farage’s party has any credibility comes with their MEP and past deputy leader of the party resorting to law to try to force UKIP to act legally and ethically (fat chance!) CLICK HERE

Nigel Farage to take a step back from politics to ‘get a grip’ on Ukip

Nigel Farage has said that he will take a step back from public politics so that he can “get a grip” on Ukip by taking “direct control” of the party.

Nigel Farage: ‘By offering a £1,300 voucher to those in two income households while dismissing single earning households shows contempt for more than a million families who opt for the more traditional child rearing structure. ‘ Photo: Getty Images

Following criticism from Will Gilpin, Ukip’s former chief executive, Mr Farage said that he will now do “less politics” in a bid to “professionalise” the organisation.

Mr Gilpin, who left this week, said that Mr Farage’s reluctance to accept professional management means the Ukip will remain “a bunch of enthusiastic amateurs” who never fulfil their political potential.

He said that Mr Farage “has to have less power” if Ukip is to become a professional political organisation.

However, in an interview with The Telegraph, Mr Farage said that Mr Gilpin “couldn’t be more wrong”.

Mr Farage said that he had given up “total control” of the party in 2010 in order to “lead” rather than “manage” Ukip.

“I gave up total control of Ukip in 2010,” Mr Farage said. “I got re-elected on the slogan of ‘Vote for me to lead the party not run or manage it’.”

In an apparent criticism of Mr Gilpin’s work with Ukip, Mr Farage added: “The party does need professional management but thus far we haven’t found the person to deliver it.”

Mr Farage said that he will now take more control of the party until he is “confident” the right managerial structure is in place.

“I gave up all managerial control of the party in 2010, I gave it up to a new group of people and at the moment we haven’t got to where we need to and so therefore…I will now be once again taking back some direct managerial control of the party until I’m confident we’ve got the right people in place.

“I will have to do less politics, fewer interviews, fewer public meetings, fewer appearances and I will have to spend more time directly overseeing the jobs being done, because the problem we have had is one of non-delivery.”

Asked if that will mean he is less of a public figure in the coming months Mr Farage said: “I’m afraid I’m going to have to be. It’s not what I intended but we do need to get a grip on things. We do need to professionalise things and so I’m going to have to take a much more direct, managerial role.”

What’s the biggest problem facing Ukip?
They’re not professional enoughThe fact that they’re not polished is an asset to them – it’s our voting system that limits themNigel Farage has too much control over the partyNigel Farage doesn’t have enough control over the partyThey don’t promote or value women

However, Mr Farage also said that he “hopes” Ukip members are “enthusiastic amateurs”.

“In many ways I think that enthusiastic amateurs and people who actually believe in what they are doing is in a way our key energy point and our key dynamic,” he said. “All you have to do with that is to make sure that it’s managed and directed in the right way.”

Mr Gilpin has said that his departure was prompted by Mr Farage’s refusal to implement his plans.

“I left by mutual agreement in response to my dissatisfaction at the fact I was not being allowed to do the job I was hired to do, which was to professionalise the party,” he said.

The party has not said who will replace him, but rumours suggest Mr Farage wants Neil Hamilton, the former Conservative MP who joined Ukip in 2002.

A Ukip spokesman said that Mr Gilpin “leaves with a great deal of warmth“.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

Clearly the article above shows just how much of a problem Farage and his party have – the dilema is that having regularly purged his party of anyone who might challenge or outshine his particular talents as a performer he now findas himself in a position of desperation where he feels forced to give up the one thing he is indisputably good at – being the affable cheeky chappie as a performer with his 3 or 4 set speeches and his readiy if disingenuous smile acting as the party performer and face of the party to try to manage the party – a job for which he has shown no ability nor credibility.

We must remember that it was Farage who has repeatedly promised to professionalise the party before elections over many years yet has abjectly failed to deliver. It was also Farage who promised the electorate that no one in UKIP would ever employ family, on Meridian TV and elsewhere, yet was exposed paying his wife Kirsten £30,000 a year by Daniel Foggo in the broadsheet media.

Subsequently it was shown that even his constituency office was not only unaware of this dishonest scam but could identify no work that Kirsten Farage performed for the party!

Then it was found that despite reaffirmation of the promises Farage’s drinking buddy Godfrey Bloom was not only renting a family owned property but employing members of his family. There were also allegations that Farage’s long term associate Gerard Batten was using UKIP money to publish anti Islamic pamphlets likely to incite racial disharmony and paying over the odds to his brother to print them!

It has also been shown on the public record that sums of money which may well exceed at least a £Million has been spiritted away unaccounted for not to mention substantial sums of money converted from the party RBS bank account as unaccountable cash.

There is also the matter of over 50% of Nigel Farage’s office account of some £450,000 being glibbly dismissed as ‘Sundry expenses’  whilst the accountant who presented the account from the trial balances of David Samuel Camps (Office Manager of a staff of 2!) the accountant was paid £6,000!!!

What happened to the cinsequential amount of cash collected in buckets by Nigel Farage’s placement John Moran, during the period when UKIP was trying to gain publicity from their breech of electoral law, for which they were found guilty!
OR
for that matter what happened to over 85% of the cash collected as a result of the Ashford, apparent scam, also involving the proven liar John Moran and others – it was Richard Suchorzevski who exposed the probable fraud and theft of the money which the chairman at the time David Bannerman admitted in a public meeting was unaccounted but that less than 15% of the money collected ever reached UKIP!

Now we are expected to believe that Nigel Farage has the skills, competence and experience to professionalise his party – I think not, when you consider his staggering lack of jusgement when it comes to appointments and backing them, to name a few:
Godfrey Bloom, Mark Croucher, Clive Page, Annabelle Fuller, Hugh Williams, Robert Kilroy Silk, Marta Andeasen, David Bannerman, Christopher Monkton, Andrew Smith, Tom Wise, Mick McGough, Douglas Denny, Neil Hamilton, Michael Pearson, Gawain Towler and many others who have similarly proved to be catastrophic for the party in their own varied ways.

Clearly Fasrage is NOT the man to professionalise his party he has shown he is not fit for the job!

UKIP chief walks out after only eight months after struggling to adapt to ‘individualistic DNA’ of the party

  • Chief executive Will Gilpin ‘far better suited to’ corporate IT, say party sources
  • Former RAF pilot hoped to make UKIP more professional
  • Ex-Tory MP Neil Hamilton rumoured as replacement

By Gerri Peev

|

The chief executive of UKIP has left after only eight months in the job, because he struggled to adapt to the ‘individualistic DNA’ of the party.

Will Gilpin, a former RAF pilot, started at the UK Independence Party last December, hoping to make it more professional.

But Mr Gilpin, who has also worked as a computer security guru and Home Office adviser, is now returning to corporate IT, which party sources say ‘he is far better suited to’.

‘Mutual agreement’; Will Gilpin will leave his role as chief executive of UKIP

'Mutual agreement': Will Gilpin will be leaving UKIP after only eight months to return to corporate IT ‘Better suited’: Gilpin will return to his career in corporate IT

Mr Gilpin, a former RAF pilot, started at the UK Independence Party last December, hoping to make it more professional.

But Mr Gilpin, who has also worked as a computer security guru and Home Office adviser, is now returning to corporate IT, which party sources say ‘he is far better suited to’.

The party said Mr Gilpin had struggled to adapt to working at a smaller organisation which relied heavily on volunteers, and where the ‘DNA is individualistic’.

UKIP insisted there was no bad blood and that the decision not to renew his contract had been made by ‘mutual agreement’.

A party spokesman said: ‘We thank him for his time, effort and the hard work he has put in and wish him all the best for the future.’

A source added that there was ‘no question of Will failing in the role’.

There is now speculation that former Tory MP turned UKIP supporter, Neil Hamilton, may take the top role. But the spokesman said he was ‘not aware’ of this.

Mr Gilpin, who describes himself as ‘socially liberal’, graduated from Cambridge with a computer science degree.

The former Tornado pilot also has a psychology degree from the Open University, makes films and builds websites.

 

He has already updated his profile on professional networking site LinkedIn.

It lists his past occupation as ‘CEO/Head of IT for a political party’. It does not name UKIP.

Mr Gilpin has also worked for the Home Office, Learning and Skills Council, Lloyds TSB and BP.

Top job: Former Tory MP Neil Hamilton has been rumoured to be in line for the chief executive role in UKIP, though the party will not confirm this

Top job: Former Tory MP Neil Hamilton has been rumoured to be in line for the chief executive role in UKIP, though the party will not confirm this

UKIP has enjoyed a huge surge in popularity over the past year and is now third in the opinion polls, at 14 per cent, in front of the Lib Dems on ten per cent.

But it has still been embroiled in controversy thanks to some of its more eccentric members.

Earlier this month, it emerged that UKIP candidate Dean Perks had given a speech supporting Sharia law. He said if someone was faced with the threat of having their hand chopped off, they would not steal.

Just days later, UKIP MEP Godfrey Bloom prompted outrage by suggesting that foreign aid was going to ‘bongo bongo land’.

RTo view the original article CLICK HERE

It is clear that the media is developing a contempt for Farage’s partyy and as such UKIP’s meaningful support is bound to be damaging as the truth about their inadequies to the task and both corruption and crass behaviour render the party unfit for office in its present form – A fact that Will Gilpin is merely the most recent of a long line of competent people has shown – though to be fair UKIP has gained in support with the demise of The BNP and as a result of their own racism and anti homosexuality with its associates in their EFD Group!

Regards,

Greg_L-W.

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

UKIP loses their professionalising cat herder & CEO

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/08/2013

UKIP loses their professionalising cat herder & CEO
.

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
 
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
&
 
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 

.

The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 

is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  

.

Nigel Farage’s party UKIP predictably loses their professionalising cat herder & CEO Will Gilpin after only 6 months!!

.

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
it will come as no surprise that ex RAF pilot Will Gilpin has quit his job as CEO of UKIP. We made it VERY clear that he was the wrong man for the job as it was clear he would be unable to professionalise the party and so it has proved.
Will Gilpin
It was predictable that with his disciplined military background as a Commissioned Officer and his subsequent experience with The Met & The Home Office he was classically the wrong man to try to fit into the Farage cult of louche & libertine behaviour, individualism and irresponsibility that is so very much the ethos of Farage’s party!

Here is how one paper published the story:

UKIP chief executive Will Gilpin quits after just eight months with the party

20 Aug 2013 07:48

The anti-European Union party said the former RAF pilot had left by “mutual agreement” and his rolling contract would not be continued

 
Blow: Nigel Farage
Blow: Nigel Farage
Reuters

The UK Independence Party was plunged into turmoil last night with the surprise resignation of its chief executive.

The anti-European Union party said former RAF pilot Will Gilpin had left by “mutual agreement” after just 8 months.

A spokesman said his rolling contract would not be continued.

Mr Giplin’s departure is the latest blow to leader Nigel Farage after a series of embarrassing interventions by senior members of the party.

MEP Godfrey Bloom sparked outrage by saying international aid was being sent to “bongo bongo land”.

And last week the party’s multi-millionaire Treasurer Stuart Wheeler was accused of sexism after saying women were “nowhere near as good as men” at games like chess, bridge and poker.

Former fighter-bomber pilot Mr Gilpin was appointed in December last year and was charged with professionalising the party’s organisation.

But party insiders told the BBC he was not well suited to working for a small organisation whose “DNA is individualistic.”

A source said the former serviceman was looking to return to corporate IT, where he would be “far better suited”.

A UKIP spokesman said: “We thank him for his time, effort and the hard work he has put in and wish him all the best for the future.”

Mr Gilpin was appointed to try to head off gaffes and David Cameron’s famous claim the party was made up of “fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists.”

The party even introduced a “fruitcake test” to weed out embarrassing candidates for next year’s European elections.

Speaking at the time he took over his new post Mr Gilpin said his job was to “deal with the inertia of a party that is used to doing things in a very relaxed, very unco-ordinated manner”.

According to his LinkedIn page, he worked in IT on behalf of the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police in the past, after 10 years flying Tornado aircraft for the RAF.

To view their original article CLICK HERE

Yet again we note that UKIP’s publicity photo demeans the party by showing Farage as of no gravitas and little consequence inanely grinning in a pub with, as ever, drink to hand.

No doubt it was tyhis sort of behaviour that made Will Gilpin’s job near impossible and little wonder he has failed to professionalise Nigel Farage’s cult!

For another view:

Ukip chief executive Will Gilpin stands down

Party sources indicated the former military officer struggled with many Ukip figures who admit they are unmanageable

  • Tuesday 20 August 2013 09.00 BST

Ukip

Gilpin’s departure may be seen as a blow to the Ukip leader, Nigel Farage. Photograph: Nick Ansell/PA

A former RAF fighter pilot who was appointed as chief executive of Ukip with a remit to professionalise the party is to stand down by mutual agreement.

Will Gilpin is to leave his post after party sources indicated the former military officer struggled with many Ukip figures who cheerfully admit they are unmanageable.

One senior figure said there were no hard feelings and Gilpin will remain a party member. The source said: “It did not work out as well as either of us hoped. There is no disquiet. It is a shame but you shake hands and move on.”

Gilpin, who flew Tornado aircraft for the RAF, told the BBC after his appointment last year that he wanted to “deal with the inertia of a party that is used to doing things in a very relaxed, very unco-ordinated manner”.

His departure may be seen as a blow to the Ukip leader, Nigel Farage, who has spoken of trying to professionalise the party ahead of next year’s European parliamentary elections that it hopes to win.

But Farage was playing down the significance of Gilpin’s departure, which follows the claim by the party’s MEP Godfrey Bloom that Britain sends aid to “Bongo Bongo Land”.

A Ukip spokesman told the BBC, which broke the news of Gilpin’s departure: “We thank him for his time, effort and the hard work he has put in and wish him all the best for the future.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE
 

Yet again Farage’s party is seen as and shown to be unfit for purpose which goes some way to explaining why their results in domestic elections have been consistently a failure – with zero MPs and not even a few close calls in by-elections and only 140ish councillors elected out of over 1,700 wanabes and 5th. place with a lost deposit in the latest by election in Aberdeen despite squandering some £17 per vote bought!

Sadly this is yet another failure, in a long line stretching back 20 years, to professionalise Farage’s party and make it fit for purpose electable to lead the way to Leave-The-EU as a majority in Britain now want.

UKIP has ridden the increase in both EUroScepticism & EUroRealism but has hugely damage the natural developement of the movement with their over racism, anti homosexuality, anti female and anti Jewish associations and their own occasional outbursts.

As a result of the lack of strategy, absence of tactics, and abject failure to devise and present a coherent EU exit and survival strategy UKIP has never achieved the results so many of us had hopes for and now we see them slide into the gutter as the unprofessional rable they largely are, profiting from the collapse in The BNP but sadly failing to attrac t a core of activists of gravitas and intellectual rigour, having purged the party over many years of anyone who might challenge Farage’s absolute control.

To be fair they have attracted a number of notable failures from elsewhere like Neil Hamilton, Rod Richards, John Gaunt, Kilroy Silk, and the like to add colour to their lack luster claque of self serving nebishes.

One need only study the poor caliber of their list of MEP aspirants to realise this is a party going nowhere in domestic politics and clearly having failed for the umpteenth time to professionalise their credibility is further damaged!
.

Regards,

Greg_L-W..

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
 
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
.
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
 

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
 
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
 
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.Blogspot.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
 
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

 Please Be Sure To .Follow Greg_LW on Twitter. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 
To Spread The Facts World Wide
of
OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN

&

To Leave-The-EU
 

Posted in UKIP | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: