Some Thoughts & reports on ‘We Demand A Referendum’
.
Please Be Sure To .
. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
To Spread The Facts World Wide
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
Some Thoughts & reports on ‘We Demand A Referendum’!
A cause whose time has come?
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,

Mail on Sunday~
Advert
07-Oct-2012
You will find the poll commissioned by ‘We Demand A Referendum’ campaign of both interest and of use in achieving our aims.
YouGov Poll: Majority of Public Do Not Trust Cameron on EU.
A YouGov Poll released today by the newly formed We Demand A Referendum Party shows the majority of electorate DO NOT have trust in David Cameron to stand up for British interests in the European Union.
The poll reveals that 54% do not have trust compared to 38% that do.
The same YouGov poll also reveals that the gap between those who wish to see an
EU Referendum (62%) widening over those who do not (24%). In a YouGov Poll last month the figures for the same question were 56% to 28% respectively.
Worryingly for David Cameron the poll shows that almost three out of four Conservative voters want a Referendum.
The single issue We Demand A Referendum Party held their inaugural conference in London on Friday issued an ultimatum to the Prime Minister that if he failed to facilitate a In/Out Referendum by 1
st January 2014 they would stand in every region in the next
European Elections under the banner ‘We Demand A Referendum’ A YouGov Poll last month showed between 16% and 33% of the electorate would vote for them in June 2014 earning them between 8 and 22 seats.
Party Chairman,
Nikki Sinclaire MEP said
“These results show there is increasing support from across the political spectrum for an EU Referendum – When will the politicians listen to the people?”
The West Midlands MEP added “The economic crisis has changed the ball game in Europe. Fundamental changes are underway, now is the time to decide once and for all which fork in the road to take.”
Sorry – the layout of the tables is near unusable! You will find a more readable version on You Gov’s web site!
| YouGov Survey Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sample Size: 2083 GB Adults |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fieldwork: 3rd – 4th October 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting intention |
2010 Vote |
Gender |
Age |
Social grade |
Region |
|
|
Total |
Con |
Lab |
Lib Dem |
Con |
Lab |
Lib Dem |
Male |
Female |
18-24 |
25-39 |
40-59 |
60+ |
ABC1 |
C2DE |
London |
Rest of South |
Midlands / Wales |
North |
Scotland |
|
| Weighted Results |
2083 |
484 |
694 |
147 |
615 |
508 |
496 |
1012 |
1071 |
252 |
531 |
712 |
587 |
1187 |
896 |
267 |
677 |
446 |
512 |
181 |
|
| Unweighted Sample |
2083 |
532 |
608 |
130 |
689 |
446 |
488 |
1030 |
1053 |
117 |
479 |
848 |
639 |
1397 |
686 |
253 |
733 |
427 |
487 |
183 |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Do you think the government should or should not hold a referendum on whether or not Britain remains a member of the European Union? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should |
62 |
72 |
58 |
42 |
76 |
61 |
50 |
62 |
61 |
34 |
53 |
67 |
74 |
57 |
68 |
58 |
61 |
64 |
63 |
60 |
|
| Should Not |
24 |
19 |
29 |
45 |
15 |
28 |
38 |
29 |
19 |
40 |
28 |
21 |
18 |
29 |
19 |
30 |
25 |
22 |
20 |
29 |
|
| Don’t know |
14 |
9 |
13 |
13 |
9 |
11 |
13 |
8 |
20 |
27 |
19 |
11 |
8 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
14 |
14 |
16 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| How much trust, if any, to you have in David Cameron to stand up for British interests in the European Union. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A great deal of trust |
6 |
20 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
7 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
| A fair amount of Trust |
32 |
61 |
18 |
54 |
49 |
17 |
38 |
35 |
30 |
31 |
39 |
31 |
29 |
38 |
25 |
35 |
37 |
32 |
26 |
31 |
|
| TOTAL GREAT DEAL / FAIR AMOUNT OF TRUST |
38 |
81 |
19 |
58 |
62 |
18 |
43 |
41 |
35 |
38 |
46 |
37 |
34 |
46 |
28 |
42 |
45 |
36 |
31 |
37 |
|
| Not much trust |
30 |
15 |
36 |
33 |
25 |
33 |
35 |
29 |
31 |
32 |
26 |
29 |
35 |
28 |
33 |
36 |
32 |
29 |
30 |
22 |
|
| No trust at all |
24 |
1 |
41 |
5 |
9 |
44 |
17 |
27 |
21 |
16 |
17 |
28 |
28 |
19 |
31 |
16 |
18 |
26 |
33 |
27 |
|
| TOTAL NOT MUCH TRUST / NO TRUST |
54 |
16 |
77 |
38 |
34 |
77 |
52 |
56 |
52 |
48 |
43 |
57 |
63 |
47 |
64 |
52 |
50 |
55 |
63 |
49 |
|
| Don’t Know |
7 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
12 |
14 |
11 |
6 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
9 |
7 |
14 |
|
I have reposted below the report from Gary Cartwright of the actual meeting/conference for two reasons – namely that he was there as part of the organisation and secondly as he is well informed as a long term employee of The EU.
Saturday, 6 October 2012
Campaign for a Referendum: Conference a Great Success!
Its always nice to spend a couple of days in London, even if it is a working visit.
On Thursday evening I was delighted to meet Katie Hopkins for the first time: she is absolutely the right person for the campaign, as her media appearences to date have proved. We were joined at dinner at the Victory Services Club by Nikki and a number of senior members of the team, and also Roger Knapman and his wife Carolyn, as well as former Lib-Dem councillor David McGrath and his wife, both of whom I know from the campaign to clear an illegal travellers camp in Meriden. The cross-party demographics of this campaign team give us both integrity and depth.
But the real reason for the trip was our inaugural conference in Westminster. The day began with Katie appearing on ITN’s Daybreak, and by the end of the first round of speakers we were on the front page of the BBC news website. Christian Party Leader George Hargreaves, and the US broadcaster and political analyst Charlie Wolf both gave excellent speeches, adding depth to the debate on our membership of the EU and what it means for our democratic integrity.
It was a chance to catch up with old friends from various parties, including one Conservative MEP, and to meet new people.
No surprise that UKIP had at least two spotters outside, reporting back on who was attending – I suspect that a few people will be getting some unpleasant phone calls or letters from their branch chairman shortly!
Two motions were passed by conference: the first calling on HMG to establish a Royal Commission to set the terms of reference for the referendum, the second calling on the PM to call a binding referendum before Jan 1st 2014.
A great success!
To view the original on Gary Cartwright’s Brussels blog
CLICK HERE
I gather from several people who were there that the inagural conference surpassed most expectations in terms of its cross party contribution, its disinterest in UKIP, seen by many as having failed and now discreditted sliding towards the history books as such, and also my contacts were pleasantly surprised at the calliber of the speeches and presentations which at many such events are all too frequently too slick, too smug and too banal delivering nothing.I am fairly reliably informed the attendance was just over 70, which although shy of the 100 I had hope for was a successful result for such short term and also in the light of the childish attacks that have so demeaned UKIP!
I note that the Tory defector and UKIP turncoat David Bannerman was present, presumably having quit the Tories due to his failure and having been put in place in Farage’s party as an MEP in the apparent realisation that he was singularly unlikely to be re-elected having seen through the corruption of UKIP he defected back to the Tories and now having realised the Tories select their prospective MEP lists rather more fairly and with considerably more integrity than UKIP he stood little chance of being above 4th. or 5th. on the list and thus not a hope of being re-elected.
It seems probable that David Bannerman was looking for a new place to hang his hat and some prospect of getting back on the gravy train with his snout in the troughs that are The EU.
It was interesting to see Tony Schofield there but as yet he still seems not to have been fully weened of his love affair with UKIP which though it has turned sour leaves him in hope over experience.
I do endorse the decision and commend to you the fact that liars and low lifes Mick McGough and John Moran were made unwelcome and asked not to enter the meeting – they have shown in much detail their lack of ethics and dishonesty and clearly had nothing to offer the new organisation and would have proved a distraction and an embarrassment as they do in UKIP.
I gather McGough is not in favour at the moment having opposed the decision of Nigel Farage and Lisa Duffy to place the idiotic and discreditted self seeker Winston McKenzie in the key role – a more obvious political prostitute and self seeker would be hard to find anywhere but in the ranks of UKIP leadership’s claque.
Imagine if UKIP ever gained any position of authority how odious it would be – the centralised denial of any sense of democratic ethics, the McCarthy style infiltration of other people’s organisations, the keeping and making of lists of attendees, the odious bigots given status in UKIP, the prostitutes, the drunken yobbery, the corruption, the controlling nature, the centralised dictatorship and so many more anti democratic actions and controlling beliefs – They call it Libertarian!!!
Let us hope that the We Demand A Referendum moves forward from this limited success to greater things, which as the polls show are both populist and popular.
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
to Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
TWITTER: Greg_LW
Please Be Sure To .
. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse. No comment has EVER been barred or deleted which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual. You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner. We welcome genuine comments.