Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Archive for November, 2008

#144* – EUkip – Farage & The Prostitute ………….

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/11/2008

#144* – EUkip – Farage & The Prostitute ………….

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
AS REQUESTED BY ANTHONY BUTCHER, THE OWNER OF WHAT WAS UKIP FORUM BUT NOW, UKIP IS ALL BUT MORIBUND, CALLED DEMOCRACY FORUM ON THE INSISTANCE OF EUkip.
I POSTED THIS FOR HIM EARLIER TODAY.
Correction for EUkip I presume:

Hi,
I have been asked by Anthony Butcher not to claim that
‘Nigel Farage consorts with prostitutes’, presumably at the demand of EUkip.
I unreservedly apologise for making the statement that ‘Nigel Farage consorts with prostitutes’ as Nigel Farage has, I understand, claimed that he did not pay her.

My statement in future will for clarity state:

“Nigel Farage having consorted with the prostitute Liga, as reported by The News of The World, did not pay the whore or so it is alleged by Nigel Farage”.

I trust this more explicit form of wording will suffice for EUkip and the corrupt and bullying leadership team and NEC of EUkip.

Once again I apologise for using the brief version stating:

‘Nigel Farage consorts with prostitutes’ which although clearly and substantively proven true has seemingly caused Anthony Butcher some embarrassment.

I do admit I do not understand why EUkip, against all the principles of UKIP, is seeking to suppress freedom of speech.

I have never stood for office as I am unprepared to be bound by the rigours and criticisms that one would be and should be obliged to be bound by as soon as you are representing others.I trust this helps to clarify the matter.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

Many of you will no doubt remember hooting with derision at the oincredible duplicity and dishonesty when Slick Willie played silly games when he had sex with Monica Lewinski – the more he repeated the statement ‘I did not have sex with that woman’, the more people wanted to know which ones he did have sex with.

The more Bill Clinton wriggled (The More He Enjoyed It?) the more stupid, shifty and dishonest he looked.

I draw no parallels with the statement of Farage’s – BUT that Farage consorts with a prostitute and then makes a big issue involving EUkip in a threat involving EUkip to shut down Blogs & Forums based on the technicality of the fact that HE CLAIMS he did not pay the prostitute just makes Nigel Farage look even more duplicitous and untrustworthy than many of us know he is.

I leave YOU to make the judgement – but in my world you pay prostitutes for the services they render just as you pay the milk man for the milk he delivers and the car mechanic for servicing your car – sadly we no longer have a milkman due in large to EU regulations, I have NEVER consorted with prostitutes for sex of any description – perverse or otherwise.

Further I have no desire to be bound by the requirements of those I represent and have thus shunned public office. I believe you should be unimpeachable if you represent others. No one forces you to seek the over generous income and perks of public office, where it behoves one to act morally with probity and integrity.

Nigel Farage has indiffensably brought EUkip into Disrepute AGAIN with his weasle words as a means of bullying – WE care not whether you honourably paid the prostitute or not, nor how your pleasures and perversions were acquitted.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Nigel Farage; Farage; Bill Clinton; Slick Willie; Anthony Butcher; | Leave a Comment »

#143* – Farage DOESN’T Pay Prostitutes!!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/11/2008

#143* – Farage DOESN’T Pay Prostitutes!!
Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
AS REQUESTED BY LITTLE ANTHONY BUTCHER THE OWNER OF WHAT WAS UKIPFORUM BUT NOW UKIP IS ALL BUT MORIBUND CALLED DEMOCRACY FORUM ON THE INSISTANCE OF EUkip.
I POSTED THIS FOR HIM EARLIER TODAY.

Correction for EUkip I presume:

Dear Greg Lance-Watkins,
You have received a warning at British Democracy Forum.Reason:——-Inappropriate Language
Greg, Having just had a major complaint to the hosting company, I would have hoped that you would have toned down the attacks on UKIP a little (or at least phrased them less aggressively). Please try to restrict your comments to relevent criticism to make our lives easier.——-Original Post:http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip-general-issues/54180-fantastic-job-peter-reeve-r-o-post560802.html#post560802

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael McGough


PeterC;Not sure where you get your figs from, but they don’t sound right to me;was there not a period of several months bfore Reeve took over? In any case are you supposed to be releasing confidential info on a public forum? What I do know for a fact is that before Reeve became our Regional Organiser we had no District / Borough Councillors and no Member of Parliament in the Eastern Counties. We do now! (and we would have a lot more if it weren’t for people wasting time, running the party down and attacking the elected leadership).Hopefully the ‘mess’ (a bad choice of word) will be resolved in February.You did say at the hustings that you were not sure which party you would vote for in June,have you decided yet?

Hi,
do you think that in the light of the failure of Nigel Farage’s attempt to create a ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment at the last NEC and the fact that the meeting was such an abject failure where NuttAll, Nigel Farage’s unelected untrustworthy and self seeking little puppet so lost control of the meeting that the Metropolitan Police had to be called to restore order will have any effect in view of the corruption that is clearly endemic in the Eastern Region in EUkip?
You claim Nigel Farage was elected leader but this is downright dishonest to claim. Farage’s staff and cronies in the party like Fuller, Croucher, Lott, Moran lied and cheated with numerous corruptions of the process in fact Douglas Denny was voted out of the role of Returning Officer for his lies, dishonesty, cheating and corruption seeking to favour Nigel Farage.
How can yo possibly claim Nigel Farage was fairly elected – he became leader by corruption and exploitation of corruption.That having failed with the ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment we note that his Bully boys and brown shirts are already mobilising to create fear and intimidation – earlier this evening his sad little muppet NuttAll issued an utterly dishonest threat

to Anthony Butcher, this forum and individuals to desperately try to pretend that the liar, fraud and cheat David the desk Bannerman had been libelled when it is clear he was not.

Similarly stating the irrefutable fact that Nigel Farage is a serial adulterer, drunkard, bully and who consorts with [SNIPPED] can not for a moment be construed as libel as it is true and can hardly damage his reputation his reputation lies in the gutter along with his behaviour, his party and his publicity.
Risibly a part of this odious bullying is the pretence that NuttAll could be considered other than treacherous.This Nazi style behaviour has failed this time due to EUkip’s endemic dishonesty and stupidity.Do you feel that the agenda being drawn up by the odious treacherous, corrupt and dishonest Derek Clark aiming to set aside the constitution on the pretence of infiltration that you have shown is designed for EUkip’s own ‘Kristall Nacht‘ a night of the long knives where the corrupt, including liars like yourself can remove those who stand in your way standing on principle, integrity and honour.Aren’t people like you, Andrew Smith, David the desk Bannerman ashamed to behave so dishonetly?Have you no morality, integrity or shame?
In some contempt at such odious people.
G.L-W.
Warnings serve as a reminder to you of the forum’s rules, which you are expected to understand and follow.
All the best,
British Democracy Forum


Hi,

Thanks for your REQUEST Anthony as clearly since this is not a Warning merely a statement of your wish rather than the rules of the Forum as I have understood them it is merely a request.
Please can you advise what inappropriate language I have used in some detail so that we all know where we stand – rather than selectively PMing me on a public matter.
Please can you advise the extent and reason why you do not wish the truth to be posted on your Forum.
This is a political Forum and this is, I understood the correct section for discussion of UKIP – that I have stated the truth and facts as I see them over my signature and am able to substantiate those facts should EUkip wish to take action and discuss the possibility of my telling lies for them and suppressing the truth then it is for them to do so – they know where I am and who I am.
I am speaking for myself and over my signature and believe that every comment I have made is true and accurate – and I amm happy to provide provenance.
As with my statement that I believe Tom Wise has committed fraud based on the fraudulent documents he and Lindsay Jenkins signed to ‘obtain’ money and the fact that his bank account was deliberately set up to mislead and that he embezzled money which is all clearly visible in the hard copy evidence I have supplied to the police and have offered anyone sight of if they contact me.
You may well recal that the very first time I accused Tom Wise of fraud I offered you sight of the relevant documents.
I note you have seen fit to censor my post perhaps you will explain why you removed the word, which as I recall was ‘fraudulent’ – perhaps you can explain why you want the fact suppressed that Derek Clark acted fraudulently and boasted of it at a public meeting at which one of your own Moderators was present.
I may have said he was duplicitous, dishonest and underhand which is easily proven or that he had betrayed the peoples of these United Kingdom and the agreement he signed undertaking to work towards greater subsidiarity of these United Kingdoms to the EU is readily available on the pro. EU Ind.Dem.Group web site, as is the fact that Nigel Farage colluded in this betrayal of the peoples of these United Kingdoms.Perhaps – having taken a robust and honest line in response to the corrupt and dishonest bullying of EUkip you might care to explain why you seem to have become their errand boy.
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:
LEAVE THE EU

Posted in McGough; Cole; UKIP; EUkip; Farage; Nuttall; Bannerman; Derek Clark; | Leave a Comment »

#142* Prof. Farage & How To Make A Horemone

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 22/11/2008

#142* Prof. Farage & How To Make A Horemone

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

AS REQUESTED BY LITTLE ANTHONY BUTCHER THE OWNER OF WHAT WAS UKIPFORUM BUT NOW UKIP IS ALL BUT MORIBUND CALLED DEMOCRACY FORUM ON THE INSISTANCE OF EUkip.

I POSTED THIS FOR HIM EARLIER TODAY.
Correction for EUkip I presume:
Dear Greg Lance-Watkins,
You have received a warning at British Democracy Forum.

Reason:——-Inappropriate LanguageAs I said last time, please be careful in what you say. Claiming that Farage consorts with prostitutes is unproven – it is your interpretation of the spanking incident.

Since he didn’t pay her for sex, I don’t think that it is appropriate to make that implication.

Quote: Paul Nuttall plans to move against GLW.Originally Posted by Bob FM I think it is right that anyone who posts things as ‘fact’ should have to prove that fact. Anthony is right to take note of this.

Do You Think He Is A Big Oaff
or is it a little room he’s talking to?

Hi,

so you will be apologising for your lies about me since you can’t source an substantive provenance.You will have noted EUkip shot you in both feet with your claim that I had hacked their web site!
I didn’t notice your apology.Can we have this statement from The BFM & EUkip sourced and an accurate quotable substantive source.Particularry in view of the proven lies and dishonesty of EUkip’s leadership team under its present duplicitous and untrustworthy leader Nigel Farage & his deputy the serial liar David the desk Bannerman.
Particularly in the light of their apparent determination to destroy freedom of speech to control the truth about them reaching decent people UKIP preparing legal action against this forum?.As answered by Anthony Butcher at: UKIP preparing legal action against this forum?
Especially in view of the present efforts of EUkip to control the fundamental right of citizens to destroy freedom of speech under the leadership of rogue elements within UKIP to destroy the principles of the informed founding grass roots members.
There is no doubt an effort by the corrupt and bullying EUkip leadership of the drunkard Nigel Farage an adulter, who consorts with prostitutes and proven dishonest all of which have been proven in the media.
He would seem to have engineered a ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment at the last NEC backed by his team of lickspittels and has formed what seems to be a group of ‘Brown Shirt’ bully boys to intimidate the decent folk in UKIP to gain dictatorial powers note the dishonest and misrepresentative claims of his apparent little unelected puppet Paul Nuttal, who from his photo possibly has that strangled rather manic look from the discomfort!
Further details can be found on my blog at: Caterpillars And ButterfliesSpecific details of EUkip’s efforts to DESTROY FREEDOM OF SPEECH & explanation as to why the efforts are corrupt, dishonest, bullying, vexatious and mallicious can be found at:
Caterpillars And Butterflies: #141* – EUkip’s NuttAll Issues Party Suicide Note!The untrustworthy Nigel Farage (as proven in the media in that having given an undertaking and also issued an instruction hypocritically and duplicitously paid his wife £25,000 from money available to EUkip under his control via the pro EU Ind.Dem.Group) Anyway this corrupt and dishonest little drunk is aided and supported by the fraud liar and cheat David the desk Bannerman who has repeatedly and fraudulently lied about who he actually is.
Regards,
Greg L-W.
for the record I am
Greg Lance-Watkins
of 8 Middle Street,
Chepstow,
Monmouithshire,
NP16 5ET
Great Britain.

I post over my name and do not seek to post behind the skirts of others nor use a false name – I endeavour to check my facts and have corroborative evidence.

I VALUE FREE SPEECH
I am and have been for many years a supporter of UKIP and am strenuously opposed to membership of the EUropean Union which I consider to be an evil, centralised, undemocratic and corrupt organisation which will CAUSE great misery for mankind through famine, warfare and mankind’s inate desire for liberty.

I utterly oppose the revolting behaviour of the leadership team and its muppets that has dishonestly and corruptly seized control of UKIP and debased its principles as EUkip for their own gain and that of their masters.G.L-W.Warnings serve as a reminder to you of the forum’s rules, which you are expected to understand and follow.

All the best,British Democracy ForumPlease accept my apologies I had always understood that a prostitute was a person who had sex, in whatever form, in return for money – which clearly the prostitute Liga did.In this context I undertake not to use the term ‘prostitute’ in his relationship with the prostitute without making it very clear that he claims he did not pay her Nigel Farage consorted with, without making it very clear that he claims he did not pay her, on your forum again.

I am astonished that he seems proud that he used her services but would seem to have defaulted on payment.

It must have been clear to Farage however drunk he was that no stranger little older than might have been his daughter would have performed such services for pleasure or even out of pity – I’m puzzled but I am happy to clarify the matter as you request.

Please let me know if there is any other phraseology or word for which you require clarification, since these new words seem not to be in your forum rules I take it that each word added will be merely a request and not some sort of warning as an underhand way to engineer an excuse to ban me for EUkip, so that the truth about EUkip can be muzzled by a denial of the Right of Freedom of Speech, as clearly that would be shamefull and dishonest.

In that I used the word ‘prostitute’ correctly in its normal meaning for a woman who is paid for sex and that my statement Nigel Farage consorts with Prostitutes is 100% true – I merely failed to point out that ‘he claims’ he did not pay her – my statement being clearly accurate I take it that in fact this is not a warning.Please let me know if there are any other words that require similar clarification and I will clearly be happy to clarify.

There used to be a rather bad schoolboy joke:

Q. How do you make a hormone
A. Don’t Pay Her!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in The BFM; EUkip; UKIP; Paul NUTTALL; Nigel FARAGE; Anthony BUTCHER; David BANNERMAN; | Leave a Comment »

#141* – EUkip’s NuttAll Issues Party Suicide Note!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 21/11/2008

#141* – EUkip’s NuttAll Issues Party Suicide Note!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

Little Paul NuttAll, as Nigel Farage’s unelected Puppet, goaded on by David The Desk Bannerman. Bringing EUkip into DISREPUTE YET AGAIN.

Hi,

you will be astonished when you realise that EUkip could be so staggeringly stupid, this looks like a suicide note in its stunning amateur understanding of LAW.

Minded that EUkip try to sell themmselves in Government as ‘The Party Of Freedom Of Speech’

This following letter was forwarded from Anthony Butcher’s ISP in America for his attention. Anthony was at one time on EUkip’s NEC and owns The Democracy Forum:

UKIndependenceParty
PO Box408
Newton Abbot
Devon
United Kingdom
TQ12 9BG
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am the Party Chairman of the fourth-largest political party in the UnitedKingdom, the UK Independence Party.
I am writing to request that you takeimmediate action concerning the website http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/, whichyour company is hosting, and which has knowingly permitted libellous anddefamatory statements about myself and the rest of my party’s leadership,in direct violation of the law in the UK.
Your Service Contract (Section 1.B, User Conduct) states that users mustnot”Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous,defamatory, obscene, offensive, indecent, pornographic, profane, orotherwise objectionable information of any kind, including withoutlimitation any transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that wouldconstitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwiseviolate any local, state, federal or international law, including withoutlimitation the U.S. export control laws and regulations, and lawsprotecting intellectual property including copyright, trademark, tradesecret, misappropriation and anti-dilution laws”Literally hundreds of posts on this publicly-viewable forum(http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/) are not only false, but also defamatory andlibellous under UKlaw.
These posts are now being viewed by British mediaorganisations as well as members of the general public – which is damagingthe reputation of my party. The moderator (and owner of the forum) hasbeen reminded of the existence of libel laws in the UK, and of theresponsibility that they, and the hosting company, have to prevent thepublication of a libel. In the UK, either publishing or repeating a libelis in itself libellous.Legal action is currently being prepared against the moderators of theforum if action is not taken; I am now asking you as the hosting company toexercise your responsibility – both under UKlaw and under your own ServiceContract – to shut down such content as soon as it is made aware of itsexistence.
You may also be interested to note that on the bottom of the main page, thesite claims to be hosted by a different company with the clear intention ofconfusing the general public.
Please find just three significant examples of libel within the last weekbelow:
1. The third post in this topic accuses the Deputy Leader of our party ofbeing a ‘proven and established fraud and liar’. Under UKlaw, it islibellous. The party holds a Criminal Records bureau enhanced disclosurewhich demonstrates the falsehood of the claims made.http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip-general-issues/54205-ukip-official-blog-nec-meeting.html
2. The first post in this topic accuses me personally of being’treacherous’. Under UKlaw, this is likewise libellous anddefamatory.http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip-general-issues/54190-nigel-farage-paul-nuttall-sordid-story-behind-beaman-s-departure.html
3. The third post in this topic is libellous because it accuses the PartyLeader of “total amorality, bullying, adultery, and drunkenness,vengefulness andlying”.http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip-general-issues/54184-david-abbott-corrects-andrew-edwards.htmlI would appreciate an immediate acknowledgement of receipt of this email,and your speedy assurance that swift action will be taken in accordancewith British law.
Yours faithfully,
Paul Nuttall -Chairman,
UKIndependenceParty

I do not claim to be a lawyer but isn’t it an offence to bear false witness? Also is it not an offence to deliberately lie to harm anothr?

I have every reason to believe as part of this bullying and dishonest claim has deliberately misrepresented British Law for gain.

The clearly untrue accusations spuriously backed up with meaningless reference renders this vexatious and mallign harassment.

Dear Mr Nuttal,
I have just been informed by our hosting company (Pair.com) that you have made a complaint about the British Democracy Forum.I would like to raise several points:
1. We have an established complaints system that we take seriously. If you think that there are any abusive or libellous comments made on the forum, this is the appropriate place to report them. We have several moderators and complaints are usually looked at within a couple of hours. If you would like to make specific complaints, we will be happy to investigate and take appropriate action. There is a small red and white triangle icon to the left of every posting that allows you to complain about a post very quickly and easily.
2. Due to the volume of posts on the forum (there are currently 350,000), we simply cannot read every single one. Therefore we depend on users to make complaints about inaccurate, offensive or libellous postings.
3. We operate a policy of free speech as much as possible, and encourage users to voice their opinions. One of UKIP’s own founding values is the support of free speech, so I find it somewhat unusual that you are complaining about people calling you ‘treacherous’, for example. This seems somewhat frivolous, especially for a political party in Britain. Politics is a rough and tumble business and you must expect robust language, and this clearly comes under the category of opinion, rather than stated fact.
4. You claim that there are ‘hundreds’ of postings that are ‘false, defamatory and libellous’, yet not a single complaint has been made. Regular readers of the forum include both of your press officers, who drop in several times per day, and at least two NEC members who are also regular readers. Strangely none of these very senior people have so far made any complaints. If the postings are as bad as you attempt to make out, why have none of your party’s senior officials made any complaints over the past few months? I am not sure why you have waited until now to make a complaint, when it would have been far more effective to ask us directly as and when the postings appeared; it seems entirely the wrong way to get postings altered if you genuinely feel that they are damaging.
5. I don’t think that it is reasonable to expect us to be able to take action unless you tell us that there is a problem. Common courtesy would involve using the complaints system, or contacting me or another moderator before approaching the web host. To repeat, we will be very happy to investigate and take action on your complaints, but you will have to tell us what they are first.
Yours sincerely,
Anthony Butcher

May I commend Anthony Butcher on his robust response unwilling to succumb to the dishonesty, unsustainable and vexatious letter from EUkip’s NuttAll.

It is astonishing the collapse in morality and principles of EUkip since Nigel Farage corruptly seized leadership of EUkip.

Hi,
excellent response by Anthony to Paul NuttAll’s suicide note on behalf of EUkip.
We all appreciate he is Nigel Farage’s unelected puppet chairman since his last one quit in disgust. NuttAll is so staggeringly incompetent that EUkip’s last NEC meeting got so out of control that 2 Metropolitan Police had to attend to restore order!
You may be assured that if any of the items are mine you can count 110% on my standing in front of you and providing chapter and verse PROVENANCE of my every comment.
Should you have difficulty over any other accusations levelled at you you may count on me standing shoulder to shoulder with you and I will provide any PROVENANCE to aid substantiation of the material where I can.
Please do NOT remove any posting that I have made as you can be assured of its accuracy and I was speaking over my signature and will stand by my comments and substantiate it.
I am disgusted – I knew that EUkip was morally in trouble but this takes the biscuit – I can see the headlines now!
EUkip, The Party Of Free Speech, Attacks Many Supporters In An Attempted Denial Of Free Speech.
I do hope there are members here who will be able to make a complete copy of this Forum and I am sure at least 50 copies can be hosted around the world if little NuttAll and his puppet masters do not withdraw this latest example of their utter idiocy and apologise.
How dare these sordid treacherous, drunken womanising liars and frauds like David the desk Bannerman who has lied cheated and dissembled regarding who he is again and again and again so betrayed the principles of the party they are destroying for their own gain.

1. Bring your full birth certificate and DNA samples to court Bannerman, you are beneath contempt – just because your ‘claimed’ daddy owns a desk that does not make you other than a liar, a fraud and a cheat. How dare you sink so low as to have hijacked a decent honourable party and use it for your own protection as a liar you fraudulent little parasite. that you are proven to be a cheat, a liar and a fraud is not in dispute and if you have enough CRB forms to paper your bathroom in the back streets of Acton and I don’t care if you stick one up your backside every time a train passes back or front it makes you no less dishonest.
Do not delude yourself you have not been libelled under ANY law even in Fantasy Land – no statement can be a libel that is true.
2. As for treacherous Paul NuttAll it is my opinion based upon his behaviour, letters in my possession, witnesses I will bring with me to court that you ARE treacherous and I can substantiate it.
Do add to that the fact that you are self seeking, deceitful, incompetent and have the morality of a rat.
That you have jumped through the hoops placed for you and been rewarded makes you a rather sordid little fellow, willing to take advantage of the dishonest treatment of other.
The performing monkey’s performing puppet monkey.
3. What an outrageous claim that the party leader has been libelled because it accuses the Party Leader of “total amorality, bullying, adultery, and drunkenness.
How can Nigel Farage be libelled by these statements he IS a totally amoral, bullying, adulterous, whoring, duplicitous, incompetent, drunkard wherein do you claim he has been libelled.
It would be virtually impossible to establish damages even were he libelled as his reputation and publicity could hardly be likely to put a value to this silly little man’s reputation above abot 17/6d. – Read the media files that are readily available.
Provenance that Nigel Farage is vengefull and bullying is clearly to be seen – Read Paul NuttAll’s fatuous letter authorised by Nigel Farage spurred on by the liar Bannerman they have issued a bullying letter seeking vengeance against the Forum and individuals for having published the truth about the party they are destroying and the corrupt leadership claque.
May I also bring to the attenrion of the bullying, dishonest bufoon NuttAll that before he continues to libel Anthony Butcher, The Democracy Forum, ANY of its members or myself may I suggest that you find a competent lawyer as neither the idiotic Rachel Oxley nor Michael Zucherman of Bent & Manure can be taken seriously if this is their perception of libel.
You owe us all jointly and severally a written apology for your all too irresponsible and glib libel founded on either your incompetence, dishonesty or sheer stupidity.
If you would like articles on other members of your debased NEC and leadership please supply suitable pictures and the order you would like the articles published and we will see if we can oblige.
Would you like an article on the dishonest and corrupt Marta Andreassen;
the duplicitous and dishonest Lisa Duffy;
the idiotic, corrupt, liar and cheat Douglas Denny who has so betrayed and besmirched the name
of EUkip with his behaviour;
the fraudster Derek Clark who venally betrayed these United Kingdoms;
the liar Graham Booth and his dishonesty over accounts;
the dishonesty and failure of duty of Trevor Colman;
the corrupt and dishonest Peter Reeve;the abrogation of duty by the untrustworthy Christopher
Gill;
The liar Malcolm Wood;
the dishonest Andrew Smith who with professional irresponsibility and abrogation of duty together with Nigel Farage incurred a guilty verdict in the courts the penalty for which has been under Judicial review and the verdict is due from Justice Walker within days which could leave EUkip technically insolvent in which case this vexatious and mischiefous threat from these idiots is invalid/unlawfull.
Shall I just work from the party lists you are too incompetent to keep control of.
No doubt there will be more from our London friend via the Colchester office tomorrow.
No doubt you will be bringing to court those whith whom you are associated who placed the deliberately dishonest blog All About UKIP with its lies, libels and defamatory dishonesty – we trust you will have excellent explanations for your association with that blog.
After months of the lies about me and friends of mine by your staff and associates including the liar and cheat Mark Croucher, the foul mouthed Fuller and the imbecilic little liar Douglas Denny – got a tad bored by your party’s undeniable attempts to vindictively bully and lie.
When the association with the low lifes of EUkip leadership and NEC over the squalid little blog became established I took the liberty of teaching EUkip a lesson in an attempt to clean up the obvious filth that had floated to the top of the septic tank that EUkip has shown itself to be.
The aim is unashamedly and with determination to unthrone the revolting people who have dishonestly and corruptly hijacked UKIP which was the dream, hope and aspiration of so very many, which you have betrayed.
BE ADVISED:Further contact from you or any of your ‘Brown Shirts’ and Bully Boys, other than to deliver the photographs and list as requested or to publish a withdrawal of your vexatious, mallicious and worthless threats and a public apology will be considered to be harrassment.
G.L-W.
I make this statement of fact in my own name and seriously advise you that to fail to apologise or to further attempt to harrass will meet with suitable response.

Posted in EUkip;UKIP; Bannerman;NuttAll;Farage;Andreassen;Brown Shirts; Reichstag Fire; Kristall Nacht; | Leave a Comment »

#140* – Former UKIP Party Secretary and NEC Member makes a libellous fool of himself

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/11/2008

#140* – Former UKIP Party Secretary and NEC Member makes a libellous fool of himself

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

Douglas Denny The Former UKIP Party Secretary and NEC Member makes a libellous fool of himself with his Bigglesesque fantasies of MI5 – Bringing EUkip into DISREPUTE YET AGAIN.


His Lies and fantasies are stunning!

Hi,

I just couldn’t resist lifting this article in its entirety from a fellow blogger – it was just so funny.

The original can be seen at: http://politicalgossipuk.blogspot.com/

It not only shows just how utterly barking Denny is but also since, when ever he writes in a political Forum, he is representing EUkip since he is one of the puppets and yes men in Farage’s corrupt EUkip – he brings EUkip further into disrepute.

Since he is thus speaking effectively on behalf of EUkip, with or without disclaimer, I am advised that if he is a man of straw as he often boasts then the Party could be held responsible for his inane fantasies.

You will note he has defamed and libelled me quite unequivocally on a public forum athttp://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip-general-issues/

He alleges I work for MI5

He alleges I sold guns (or pretended to sell)

He identifies specific magazines I sold guns in.

He alleges I spied on individuals putting them under surveilance

He alleges I did this up until 1997

Douglas Denny is a liar.

Not only is there not a shred of evidence to support his dishonest , defamatory and libellous lies but he further compounds it with subsequent lies on the same thread.

Needless to say without a shred of substantiation the dishonest and morally reprehensible owner of the forum in question Anthony Butcher

posts the material and dishonestly colludes in the libel – it is clear that he is willing to deliberately libel me, as he has done so regularly now and in the past, even denying me the right of reply or self defence until recently. He should be aware of just how dishonest Douglas Denny is in that he levels speculative accusations againt him!

Anthony Butcher has posted no caveat nor disassociation from his libel and is thus as cullpable as EUkip.

I was amused by the way a fellow blogger utilised the material posted by these fools!

Shown below is correspondence from a former UKIP Party Secretary and current NEC member – Mr Douglas Denny – to Anthony Butcher of the British Democracy Forum stating that ‘the Forum’ has a ‘high probability’ of being infiltrated (or even controlled)by MI5.

Really Mr Denny?

Well ‘as a scientist’ (though we thought you were an optician), perhaps you should study a little closer the posts made on the Democracy Forum.

Most appear to be childish name calling and petty arguements (of late at least) or a means by which ‘Leadership supporters’ can criticise and hurl abuse at ‘Leadership detractors’ – in fact we at Political Blogspot UK have noticed you to have been one of the main culprits.

Why on earth MI5 would be remotely interested in ‘infiltrating’ what has become ‘a children’s playground for name calling’ is beyond us.

Perhaps Mr Denny MI5 has also infiltrated ‘Slumberland Beds’ – afterall ‘pillow talk’ can be most revealing.

With people like this in charge of UKIP is it surprising the Party is making so little progress?

Tony.

It appears you think it fanciful for me to be suspicious of your website possibly (note the caveat) being a set-up of MI5, or linked in some way.

I will send you separately at the end of my text an article about Julia Pirie, which will indicate (as a typical example) of why that is entirely possible, or to put another way – not completely implausible.

I am a scientist and I know that nothing is certain (except for humans death and taxes). Everything therefore can only have a probability value given to it. Even some of the most fundamental things known in physics end up as probability values only – when we know enough about them. The whole of quantum mechanics is about probabilities for example.
I can tell you that the probability of there being a file in MI5 headquarters Millbank on you, and me, and everyone who appears on your forum is almost 1.0 (100%).

That MI5 takes a very keen interest in political individuals and parties is well known – and that means everyone, even those in government (although there is not supposed to be surveillance of MPs – there is no doubt discrete investigation all the time).

This country is good at it and has been doing it for centuries.

I used to have a friend who was ex-MI5 who spent a lot of his time going around the country keeping people who were in the Communist party under surveillance.

Some of those people are now in the present Labour government.

If you think MI5 does NOT keep a close eye on the BNP, or UKIP or the Greens or any other political organisation especially small parties you are naive. MI5 has been recruiting hundreds of new people in the last couple of years just to be able to monitor the Muslim threat alone within the UK.

There was an announcement in the newspapers recently from the head of national security in governement that there are something like 10,000 Muslin suspects in Britain currently under surveillance. How do you think they keep an eye on these people?

In the case of your forum…..Let us make a few hypothetical extrapolations just for the fun of it to test the credibility some of these hypotheses, and ask is it likely; just credible?; just possible? or just plain unlikely.

Suppose I was an MI5 controller in the political section, UK; and I wanted to keep tabs on UKIP activists. How best to do it?

First and foremost one needs membership lists. (NO problem – lots of ways to obtain them). Having obtained them, second, how to keep and eye on the attitudes of activists? …. well you could set-up a website now we are into modern information technology, specifically dealing with UKIP issues – and monitor it for the activity.

Anyone who says “I believe it is time to blow up parliament” – Bingo! you have someone to look more carefully at don’t you?

Now GLW used to do this kind of work for MI5 in the ‘old’ days before the internet – How?
By putting adverts into magazines like ‘Combat Magazine’ with offers for weapons and suchlike. Then all he had to do was filter the results and put any suspicious characters under surveillance. Simple. Standard fishing exercise.

They no doubt do that now with Muslin organisations/publications/internet activity.

Now what is the probability your site is like this? What is the possibility it was set-up deliberately to do this? – that will have a prob. value.

What about the possibility of being approached later for information feed to MI5? (personal information and real-time current logging data etc).. higher probability again than first. This is normal procedure, for example: All of the large newspapers have links through specific journalists with the newspaper monitoring its content.

What about being part of some external network other than MI5 for political surveillance? – another prob. value…. higher than most of the above.

What is the probability it is just a simple wenbsite set-up by a computer buff after leaving UNi to make a bob or two ..higher probability yet again than any above……
……. but that does not eliminate any of the above!

Now do you think I am so daft as to not consider these things? Particularly in view of the sustained anti-UKIP stance of this site over some years, with little pro-UKIP encouragement from the site owner?

What do I think the probability values are? … not telling.

And THEN there is infiltration ……. a much bigger ball game altogether with a new set of parameters to consider….

If you think I am fantasising, read this obituary from the Telegraph recently (29 the Oct):-(sent separately):or here is a link:-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obit…lia-Pirie.html

Regards,
Douglas.

View this blogger’s work at: http://politicalgossipuk.blogspot.com/

Will that be two Weatabix or three with your breakfast, whilst you read the rest of your comic 001.5?

It would be hard to make up such a level of stupidity and all merrily quoted as fact clearly seeking to denigrate people by name. It might be funny but this dishonest idiot is on the NEC of EUkip and they are trying to keep a few of their snouts in the troughs on the EU gravy train – fighting eachother and out of all rational control like ferrets in a sack – They want YOU to support and vote for them!!

Just imagine what they would be like if they got elected they’d probably all go Native and be whoring and drunk for 5 years – just what might they achieve for our country besides bad publicity and self enrichment.

Silly me that is what they did after the last EU elections! One jumped ship having been lied to by Farage, one went to prison, one left the group, one was arrested and is now on bail, one quit (after a raft of lies) a new one was paid off for his corruption ………………

Wow they are impressive – perhaps that is why a dangerous fool and proven liar Douglas Denny feels at home with them on EUkip’s leadership team. Denny was dumped by The NEC for corruption and dishonesty during the dishonest placement scam of the leadership appointment.

(should I sign this 2004?)

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in Farage; EUkip; UKIP; Douglas Denny;Anthony Butcher; MI5; | Leave a Comment »

#139* – EUkip, The BNP & The Grip of Evil

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 19/11/2008

#139* – EUkip, The BNP & The Grip of Evil

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

EUkip McCARTHY, POL POT, THE BNP & THE GRIP OF EVIL

Hi,
there is no doubt that the fact that some 12,000 names, addresses, phone numbers and eMails of BNP members has ‘materialised’ in the public domain is a catastrophy for all of us.
I hold no brief for the BNP but I have never believed that silencing their revolting message has any merit – the more they are exposed in the media the more such sordid foundations and aims are questioned and shown to be contemptible.
However there are many who naiively support the BNP, without much understanding of their revolting background and fellow travellers, which they refuse to repudiate or of their real aims.
The catastrophy however, for one and all, is the likelihood of a witch hunt across police, government and snivil cervice as teachers, union members, prison warders and the like are checked against the lists.
Now consider, as we enter into the inevitable suffering of Gordon Brown’s economic illiteracy – there will be massive job losses! Well here is a list of some 12,000 people who can be fired with very little recourse to the defence of the law – how can one claim unfair dissmissal if thrown out of your job for your BNP membership when the police and snivil cervice to whom you complain would themselves have been dumped had they been so unwise as to join an organisation without checking out the core principles and irrefutable history!
Thus we are all the loser.
The BNP are in something of a muddle and though they have put both EUkip and UKIP under attack – I do feel that having had their membership names, addresses, telephone numbers and eMail addresses where available of their membership data base of about 12,000 members fall into the public’s hands they may be a tad busy for a month or two.
Fortunately I have a copy of their data base so any alterations made to obfuscate the data from now on will be provably invalid.
In intel term – The BNP’s best action would be to welcome the leak (since it has happened) and seek to ammend the listing to render it unsound, unreliable and untrustworthy and then post up literally 100s of apparent mirrors of the wikileaks site – chaos is a good way to obfuscate 😉
I am surprised that some mischief maker has not paid membership in my name to ensure that I appear on the list 😉
Reading/scanning through the lists Nigel Farage’s ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment collapses yet further into ruins – there is no mention of Dr. David Abbott, Dr. Eric Edmond, John West or myself!
EUkip look even more stupid when one starts to delve a little deeper!
As a citizen and tax payer I would advocate that under clear supervision The British Government should consider working with the BNP and providing the small amount of funding required to carry out the actions to obfuscate – as above.
Though I reveil tthe BNP at all times in all ways – I fear a society being run like a series of corrupt, self seeking and vile kangaroo courts is not a society I value or wish to tollerate.
We are taking of the McCarthyite process, currently adopted by EUkip’s vile and corrupt leadership and NEC being spread across the whole of society. Consider the damage and trauma that McCarthyite committees gave rise to.
Even today there is a fear inherent in the sort of false accusations of the Brown Shirts, Robespierre, Pol Pot and their like. Acting, you will have noticed, like Nigel Farage’s unelected evil little puppet chairma Paul NuttAll their witch finder general the proven liar and fraud David Bannerman drawing up his fabricated and shamefull charge sheets.
Scurrying around in this ordure are the revolting dissemblers like Mark Croucher, Douglas Denny, Michael Zucherman, Peter Reeve, Rachel Oxley, Andrew Smith, Annabelle Fuller, George Curtis, Stuart Agnew, Martha Andreassen and similar filth and low lifes like rats seeking and squabbling over prefferment on a dung heap – raising a level of fear and dissent.
I believe that the BNP should be helped so that they do not get USED, they are revolting without being exploited by the venal – as are EUkip who are so closely linked in style.
We don’t think ANY of this is very funny – it is a betrayal of the values of these United Kingdoms!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in EUkip;BNP;UKIP; Nigel Farage; Paul Nuttall; Zucherman;Douglas Denny; Derek Clark; Peter Reeve; David Bannerman; Mark Croucher; Fuller; | Leave a Comment »

#138* – EUkip, NuttAll & Farage Exposed + others

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 18/11/2008

#138* – EUkip, NuttAll & Farage Exposed + others

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

EUkip SHOWN AGAIN IN ITS WORST LIGHT – SO VERY EASY – SO VERY SAD!

Hi,

these memory sticks are really handy aren’t they contacts close to the leadership/NEC team can just walk past pop a stick in and the members are kept informed what their corrupt, incompetent, dishonest leadership are upto to silence whistle blowers and those trying to clean up EUkip and restore it to its members in a condition men and women of integrity could vote for.

Here is a letter exposing some of the truth of what is going on in the eastern region – clearly this information is substantiated by other published material and facts already known and proven.

You will also note I have earlier posted Nigel Farage’s hopeless and lightweight unelected puppet chairman Paul Nuttal’s post as referred to herein. His comments were idiotic then and palpably dishonest this letter merely shows just how dishonest Paul Nuttall is and how corrosive is the new post ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment as the corrupt and dishonest leadership peddle utterly risible accusations for the suspension of The Disciplinary structure and their own Constitutionshortly after the December NEC meeting which will likely vote unanimously to extend the corruption.

The aim is to seize dictatorial control for Nigel Farage backed by a favoured/rewarded claque.

EUkip is clearly so corrupt it is unfit for purpose – ANY purpose.

Read the facts and draw your own conclussions. Do phone me if you require additional facts or further substantiation.

From: johnwest81@hotmail.com
To: ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk
Subject:
Re: Your letterDate:
Mon, 17 Nov 2008

Copied to the
NEC

Dear Mr Nuttall,
Thank you for your
letter.

1. I was made aware of alleged criminal
activity and I reported it to the police.

This is my duty as a
good citizen; indeed it could amount to an offence not to do this.

Yet you claim that I have brought the party into
disrepute! I find it extraordinary that the chairman of a political party can
condemn a member for being a law abiding citizen and reporting the matter to the
relevant authorities.


I should add that I spoke to Chelmsford CID who
confirmed that I did ‘the right thing’ in reporting my concerns to them.
Obviously, you feel that that alleged criminal activity should be ignored if it
involves a member of UKIP.


You state that I had not a shred of evidence. I was
also not aware that you had direct access to police files. Also, why should I
show remorse for reporting an alleged crime that has now been passed to OLAF?
The police HAVE passed on the matter to OLAF. Fact.


I have spoken to Neil Thomson, Investigator, who has
confirmed that they are looking into this case. The case number for Jeffrey
Titford is OF/2008/0764. I would strongly advise you to withdraw your allegation
that OLAF is not involved.


2. I note that you seem strangely reluctant to
deal with the complaints that I have made.

I complained to you about the disgraceful behaviour of
Douglas Denny and Michael Zuckerman who both feel that it is acceptable to use
mental illness as a term of abuse.


Yet you did NOTHING.

I complained THREE times to you in my capacity as an
elected governor of the Suffolk NHS Mental Health Trust and every time you have
lacked the common courtesy to reply.


3. The NEC has a habit of ignoring
complaints.


In November 2007, I organised a UKIP conference on
immigration. George Curtis, the Eastern Counties Regional Chairman, sent me a
letter about this.


In this letter he issued a veiled threat. This threat
concerned my interest in standing for the 2009 Euro elections. I sent a letter
to the Eastern Region Committee complaining about this. The committee never
acknowledged my letter nor issued an apology.

I then wrote to the NEC about Mr Curtis. I pointed out
that it was unacceptable for a regional chairman to issue veiled threats to a
UKIP member. Both the Leader and the Chairman ignored my complaint.


4. On the 9th April 2008 I was given permission
by the NEC to hold a UKIP conference on Law and Order.


Despite this Jeffrey Titford MEP sent an email, dated
28th April, to several hundred Eastern Region UKIP members . In this email he
attacked Chris Hudson and I for holding the conference.I immediately phoned John
Whittaker to complain about this.


I explained that Jeffrey Titford had abused his
position by using the Eastern Region membership database to attack other UKIP
members.


I also said that I felt that this email was sent in a
deliberate attempt to damage both our reputations in the East. I asked John
Whittaker to get Jeffrey Titford to issue an apology and a full retraction. Mr
Whittaker refused to do this.


Following this, I complained to the NEC about Jeffrey
Titford’s abuse of the party database.


Although my complaint was acknowledged by several NEC
members it was never dealt with.


5. I complained to you and M. Zuckerman about
the behaviour of Peter Reeve and Ron Whitmore.


You did NOTHING.

My wife wrote two letters to you requesting that they
be brought before a disciplinary hearing for their conduct at a Suffolk Coastal
meeting.


She also complained about Ron Whitmore phoning our
house at 7.25 am and making threats. You have not even acknowledged her letters.


I then find out – via Greg Lance-Watkin’s ‘blog’ – that
you have written to Peter Reeve endorsing his behaviour.

Indeed, you referred the matter back to him.

So you now allow the accused to judge his own case.
Even the EU have not yet thought of that one !


What angers me even more is the fact that I had to find
this out from GLW! You lacked even the decency to inform me personally.


Indeed, I am still waiting.

6. D. Denny and M. Zuckerman accuse me of
reporting D. Bannerman to the police.

I write to you pointing out that this is untrue. I
request an apology from them for making the allegation. You ignore my complaint.


7. I make a reasonable request under Section 7
of the DPA and yet you decline to provide me with the requested
material.


By doing so you are in breach of the law. I have now
reported you and the party to the Information Commissioners Office. You only
have yourself to blame.


You and the leadership are now the subject of two ICO
complaints, one police investigation and one court action. And all this happened
because you and the leadership think you are above the law.


I had no alternative but to do this as you had failed
to respond to my reasonable requests.


8. I ask for an apology for the You Tube video
leak and yet not a single member of the leadership has had the courtesy to do
so.


Indeed, Farage later appears in a pro-EU newspaper
supporting Fuller’s fantasy that she was forced out due to sexism!


I complain to you about this and yet you did
NOTHING.


9. I have made complaints about several NEC
members and yet these very people will be allowed to judge me.


So the accused are going to judge their accuser.

Have they ever heard of a conflict of interest?


I am sure I will get a show trial worthy of Stalin’s
Soviet Union.


No doubt, I will be denied the right to legal
representation and will face accusations of links to the BNP.

When will I receive a copy of the indictment? Will
David Bannerman be writing it despite being the subject of a complaint made by
me?


David Abbott only got his copy the Saturday before the
meeting.


Can I expect the same shabby treatment?


10. You say I am being used by unsavoury
characters.


Who are you referring to?

Name them or withdraw your remarks!

How dare you claim that I am being manipulated! If
anyone is being manipulated it’s you.


I associate with decent men and women who want UKIP to
be represented by democratic, honest and above all moral people.


You, on the other hand, seem content to endorse
corruption, dishonesty and lies. You presided over a kangaroo court that removed
three NEC decent members.


You allowed David Bannerman to be the accuser and one
of the judges.


Don’t you even feel slightly uncomfortable with this?
As an historian I must say this sounds very, very familiar.


Remember Stalin, Napoleon and Hitler and their abuse of
the Law?


Is this the future you want for
UKIP?


Yours sincerely,
John West


Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in EUkip;UKIP;John West;Paul Nuttall;Zucherman;Denny;George Curtis;Jeffrey Titford;Peter Reeve;Ron Whitmore;Bannerman | Leave a Comment »

#137* – EUkip, Farage, The Prostitute & Cashing In!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 18/11/2008

#137* – EUkip, Farage, The Prostitute & Cashing In!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

EUkip SHOWN TO BE
UNFIT FOR PURPOSE – ANY PURPOSE!

Hi,

Having made a statement regarding Nigel Farage’s having consorted with prostitutes on what was EUkipForum recently, I was challenged by Matthew Davies
Originally Posted by mkpdavies
I hope you can back the claim on prostitutes up with some serious evidence. We are well into the realms of libel now.

Hi,

Firstly Matt we are nowhere near libel, so to imply we are is to misrepresent the position and that could be contended to be dishonest and in and of itself libellous – but let us let that pass as I am aware you really meant to ask a question not to make a dishonest accusation.

I appreciate Matt was a little sloppy in his question but clearly neither honesty, accuracy or veracity are virtues much valued on Anthony Butcher’s Forum. Accusations of ‘liar’, dishonest, even BNP Membership or anti EUKIP also even a support for murder or anti Semitism are seemingly made by those favoured by Anthony Butcher and their dishonesty is rarely challenged whilst to protect them from challenge threads are locked – this seemingly is a technique supportive of some to the disadvantage of others.
That said the forum is worth joining , despite the clear lack of understanding of Justice, fair play or balance, as one can possibly learn a little of the logic whereby EUkip supporters are willing to support the corruption, dishonesty and incompetence of their leadership, NEC & staff. As yet I have heard no logical reason other than that one should support corruption so that failure can be apportioned!

This sounds to me the logic of the lunatic assylum! Somewhat like permitting Gordon Brown to staggeringly damage our economy over 11 years and then leave him there for consistency so that he can borrow £Billions more to make it worse!

‘One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest’ – In fact the air is dark so many of them are flying over!

Let us revert to the specific of Matt Davies’s question:

For a libel or slander to occur the facts led must be untrue otherwise it is no more than either an original statement of fact or a reitteration of facts authoratitively published, either verbally in public or written.

I believe the case was made much of by The News of The World, where he was taken home by a prostitute from a public house.

I understand the prostitute in questiopn was willing to sell hersexual favours for a sum of around £20,000 paid by The News of The World and written of across two pages.

The prostitute in question, as I recal, provided her services, as written of in rather ‘garish’ detail, I am sure Nigel Farage will have a better memory of the event than I since it most clearly involved him and as I recal was not her name Liga.

Clearly Farage is neither defamed nor libeled by this reitteration of facts published in the media without challenge.

You will have noted Nigel Farage is all too rapid in obtaining financial gain when he is alleged to have brought EUkip into disrepute by employing a second family member when he has already brought EUkip into disrepute by employing the first member of his family in complete disregard for both his undertakings and his rules for others!

Clearly he is happy to be letigious when wronged but when he has brought EUkip into disrepute I am unaware that he has even had the integrity or good grace to apologise.

Interestingly having damaged EUkip by his consorting with Liga, who clearly acted for money, or with his oft vaunted drunkenness and his utter hypocracy and dishonesty in employing his wife for £25,000 a year – not so much as an apology has been made public.

Seemingly when he can make money out of EUkip being damaged, as with his demand for damages for the report of The Sunday Times which featured the fact that he was under investigation by OLAF and a possible cause seemed to be intimated, that yet again he was acting hypocritically and dishonestly by employing his son which could not be substantiated.

It is interesting that Farage received a sum approaching £10,000, paid by The Sunday Times, presumably rather than let costs spiral out of control as they beat his claim down from some £30,000 to the more realistic £50 many would claim his reputation was worth. Like every other year there seems to be no donation recorded from Nigel Farage to EUkip that could relate to the damage he had done EUkip.

I also note that although Farage AND EUkip lied about The Sunday Times, which was both verbal and on The Web Site – yet neither EUkip nor Farage have had the good grace to apologise, when forced to admit that he was indeed under investigation by OLAF.

I trust this helps Matt and any others to understand that I would not dream of deliberately libelling or telling a lie about anyone or any thing and will happily supply substantiation of my every statement that may be thought to libel.

However from now on since I have, I believe, more than clearly shown I can substantiate my comments – I shall NOT respond to such demands, other than when I chose unless challenged by the individual claiming to be libelled.

I feel sure any reasonable individual will be happy with this standard of provenance on this Forum where those who defame me or lie about me or make accusation are left unchallenged. Clearly since the owner of thie list permits dishonesty and attacks on me ‘personally’ and has cut many threads wherein I have asked for substantiation or withdrawal and the apology with respect to the lies to seemingly protect the dishonest and the abuser – I can reasonably seek the same right to silence granted others.

I do however undertake to respond to the first party individual that may claim to have been libelled – NOT a third party.

Thank you for the opportunity to clarify for all Matt.

The original thread can be found on EUkip Forum now known as British Democracy Forum at
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/
Under:
British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues
Question: Is it me ?

I have made minor adjustments for clarity here.

Regards,

Greg L-W.

01291 – 62 65 62

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in UKIP | Leave a Comment »

#136* – Anthony Butcher’s Contentions Analysed

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 17/11/2008

#136* – Anthony Butcher’s Contentions Analysed

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

EUkip SHOWN TO BE UNSUSTAINABLE!

Hi,

Anthony Butcher posted his views on his open Forum which used to be UKIPForum and can be found at: http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/

Anthony your comments sound more like a mantra stated because it is – rather than because it was – thought about.

Perhaps introducing vision and a spot of political reality may help as I think your opinion is unsound and unsupportable – Unless you find supporting evil to be an acceptable policy, perhaps a poll on the matter would help.

Let us look at the contentions you make from a different perspective:

Even from a critic’s point of view, Farage has to be allowed to stand in the EU
elections as UKIP leader.

Perhaps you could give some politically sound ethical reason to support the contention of wasting time on a hopeless inadequate who is so insecure that he is a serial adulterer, a drunkard, has absolutely no idea or competence as a leader and is incapable – no doubt from fear – of delegation.

As a critic I believe you are wrong and have failed to provide ANY reason for your contention.

This is his grand plan –

So is THAT what he has led you to believe and what is the party’s?

to double the number of UKIP MEPs (to 18 or 24, it isn’t
clear).

If it is it is risible – could ANYONE be foolish enough to believe that without substantial funding IN PLACE NOW, competent staff, sound candidates, an honest selection process and a platform to launch from NOW it is just childish or dishonest to imply it is likely.

There are less seats, higher goal posts, greater competition and a collapsed membership Oh yes & 0.03% in the last by election!

If and when UKIP fails, and perhaps ends up with just three
or four MEPs,


It has failed and visibly. What makes you think it will get 3 or 4 MEPs or is your prediction based upon static inertia!

then Farage will lose all credibility as a leader

In what way has he not already?

He has attracted a body of bad publicity – his performance as leader has been catastrophic and divisive and his ‘Reichstag Fire’ moment has back fired on him, even if he does try to roll on through Kristall Nacht to expulsions and a Hitler Youth style claque in EUkip Yoooof telling tales on their elders & rewarded by personal gain – viz. Delroy Young being ambushed by some unknown lad at an NEC meeting to aid the duplicitous Lisa Duffy.

and will have to step aside for someone completely fresh to
take over..


Why since if EUkip get ONE MEP it is most likely to be Farage who would not step aside he would jump ship for his own gain – he has already shown himself to be only too willing to exploit corruption for his personal gain.

and that means someone who isn’t in his trusted circle…
which means someone who doesn’t hold any position in the leadership at the
moment.

There is no trusted circle merely those who are bought or controlled.

We can argue on this forum forever about his faults,


Yep probably – there are that many. If you seek brevity may I commend with a felt tip pen you list his competences and skills on the back of a postage stamp.

but political leaders stand and fall on election results.


Some are arrested, some hanged, some guillotined and some just leg it at speed! Many merely resign some like Charles Kennedy when exposed as hopwless and irresponsible drunks – regardless of their obvious skills and affable charm but that in the main is a product of their own honourable behaviour and the wisdom of a competent NEC.

No one expected UKIP to do well in the General Election or
the local elections, but the EU elections are a completely different
matter.

Why on all points – after 15 years? Could it be the serial incompetence of its leaders and the pandering of its weak and weakened NEC?

Farage has been given far more leniency by the party than
most other party leaders would ever have had,

NO he has systematically cut the throat of any competitor aided by the lies and dishonesty of his staff and cronies seeking preferment and a place with their snout in the trough.

but he has one big chance to prove himself.


He has had 15 years – when will someone wake up – he HAS proved himself – he has proved he is catastrophic an abysmal failure miles out of his depth as a leader. A slick performing monkey but increasingly tarnished as a monkey in silk is a monkey no less.

It is far too late for a new leader to have any chance of
making an impact on the party now in time for the elections.

Boy he sure has made an impact, similar to The Black Death which killed half the population he has halved the membership and destroyed the party.EUkip could NOT be worse off with an entire new leadership at any stage – though the sooner the better.

So if you are a UKIP member I would urge you to stop
plotting to oust him


& I would ask you to justify your reasons for promoting catastrophy.

and let him get on with it for the moment.

Every day he has been in power he has damaged EUkip – how do you work that out.

I would contend that it is as daft as watching Gordon Brown control our economy increasing debt at £9,111 a second over 11 years & then leaving him in charge to borrow more to stimulate growth!! What, of collapse and rot!

That doesn’t mean that his leadership decisions shouldn’t be
criticised –


It has made no Leadership decisions it has made self interested moves to enclave undermining loyalty and support save from the corrupt and the gullible.

that is only healthy –

NEVER run a care home – clearly your policy would be leave them in their beds soaked in urine and their own ordure and they will get better and grow younger!

but attacks for the sake of attacks won’t achieve
anything.

Oh how I agree – let us hope enough people realise the attacks are to clean up EUkip and rebuild a strengthened UKIP which people of integrity can vote for.

If you think that he is doomed to fail anyway,

Wait until he has denuded the funds, destroyed the records, jumped ship and run perhaps – leaving the party with multiple court cases and perhaps as much as £1Million of costs and forfeiture due to Farage & Andrew Smith’s crass irresponsible incompetent and unprofessional behaviour re. handling donations.

then don’t provide him with more excuses to try to worm his
way out of it afterwards.


Why wait – we know he was and is a disaster.

You and a few others will probably be out of the party soon
anyway, so thisis probably a pointless post! 🙂

Increasingly the few decent members are gone or going. The activists have mostly vanished and the membership is still falling.

You may have gathered I believe you’ve rather lost the plot but the question is why – for whom are you working because clearly it is not for UKIP or common sense for UKIP.
Are you considering a personal position AFTER the election as otherwise your suggestions make absolutely no sense in either political or commercial terms.

The Original of this rebuttal of Anthony Butcher’s contentions by me can be found at: http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip-general-issues/54255-me-5.html#post558854

If you are a member of the forum and are willing to be subject to some rather starange rules where the owner seems to have little understanding of a level playing field, scant regard for fairness, largely denies free speech when it suits him and has little comprehension of fundamental tennets of justice do join in – it is free but do not expect integrity or balance to feature and the chosen are permitted to libel and lie whilst the victims are controlled.

That apart it is quite fun, though little positive is discussed nor much on political thought, vision or structure. That said there are a couple of good brains present when they can break free of what can only be described as the ‘ya-boo yobbery’ so prevalent in followers and hopefully left behind by leaders or the competent.

See you there perhaps.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Anthony Butcher; UKIP Forum; Farage; | Leave a Comment »

#135* – John West Risks Telling The Truth!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 16/11/2008

#135* – John West Risks Telling The Truth!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

EUkip HAMMERS ANOTHER NAIL IN THE LEADERSHIP’S COFFIN!


Subject: Letter of complaint: Stuart Gulleford
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 17:08:31 +0100
Dear John,

Please find attached my letter of complaint.

Best wishes
John

The interesting factor about the letter is the date – you will note this long pre dates the fantasies and black spin of EUkip, their corrupt puppet chairman Paul NuttAll and the dishonest propaganda so readily accepted by The East Anglian Times.

The following letter sent to Dr. John Whittaker on 06-May-08 was far from the first attempt by John West to clean up what seemed to be irregularity and wiith the joy of hindsight was clearly corruption in EUkip.

Private and Confidential

Dear John,

I am writing to you regarding comments made to me by Stuart Gulleford concerning David Campbell Bannerman, Gerard Batten and Christopher Hudson. He has on more than one occasion complained to me about them speaking at events in the East. This includes the two conferences organised by me. I have informed him that I am not prepared to be pressurised into dropping speakers simply because he does not like them.

1. He has referred to David Campbell Bannerman as a ‘carpetbagger’ who is using me and the conference to raise his profile in the East.

2. He has also referred to Gerard Batten as a ‘carpetbagger’ who, like Bannerman, is using me and the conference to raise his profile in the East. He has also called Gerard ‘a bad MEP who does nothing for the people of London’.

3. He has referred to Chris Hudson as an extremist and someone who is not to be trusted.

I am extremely concerned that a paid representative of the party and Vice chairman of the Eastern Counties Regional Committee is willing to make such remarks about other party members. I should also add that I have a witness to these remarks.

Yours sincerely,

John West

I have had these communications for some time from a source close to the NEC but felt it was unwise to publish them however in view of the dishonest spin against John West seeking corruptly to pretend he is somehow at fault – as supplied by EUkip to The East Anglian Times.

In the light of the lies I phoned my contact for permission to use the material and I also phoned John West for his permission. John West found it hard to accept that the only way to deal with liars was to confront them with fact and the truth.

With their permission I therefore publish these communications, showing that there is no truth in the mallicious propaganda from EUkip’s corrupt leadership that ‘John West complained when he was not GIVEN a preferential position on the MEP list’.

John West did not expect a ‘viable’ position as he was using the process to raise his profile for the future General Election so that he could make a good showing for EUkip as a PPC with the extra experience and the added profile. He did not however expect to be lied about, abused, criminally defamed and attacked by the very Party he had aimed to serve.

Never in May had it occurred to John West that people might be ‘GIVEN’ positions – he had faith in the democratic process and perhaps rather naiively trusted EUkip to be different, honest and democratic.

John West is now not just rightly sad and feeling betrayed – he is angry that EUkip has lied to the members, lied to the media and lied both to and about him.

I wonder now that EUkip have been irrefutably shown to be corrupt whether thay will have the integrity to contact Graham Dines of The East Anglian Times and apologise for their dishonesty and ask for a retraction of their lies about John West and regarding OLAF.

The correspondence spreading the lies, which we will publish later and some we have already published are signed by Stuart Gulleford, Peter Reeve the Regional Orchestrator and Paul NuttAll Nigel Farage’s unelected salaried puppet chairman. In any moral and decent organisation shown to be so corrupt these individuals would apologise to Mr. West and to the party for having brought it into disrepute and their resignations WOULD be accepted.

Minded that the Regional Primary Candidate David Bannerman has fraudulently gained his position, lied about his identity and benefitted from the corruption do be aware that EUkip’s own Returning Officer ex Tory MP Piers Merchant has reported that the selection process and election was so corrupt and corrupted as to require re-running under the aegis of an external third party as the NEC & Leadership have shown they can not be trusted.

EUkip has no right to ask members of the electorate to support them in any way least of all by voting for them. To support EUkip as a member is an act of corruption in betrayal of patriotism and these United Kingdoms.

You will note the past 2 chairmen John Whittaker & Petrina Holdsworth both resigned in protest at uncontrolable corruption, the past General secretary Godffrey Kingscott has similarly resigned advocating people withdraw support.

It is time these evil parasites on the body politic were shut down by the members and/or the Electoral Commission – It may well be a consideration that they should be shut down by the police on behalf of The Ombudsman for Standards in Public Life.

I leave the matter to YOUR morality as to what you will do to help clean up EUkip or close it down.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

I SUGGEST – since there is no political party of repute advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country:

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper:

LEAVE THE EU

Posted in EUkip; John West; John Whittaker; Stuart Gulleford; Chris Hudson; David Bannerman; Gerard Batten; | Leave a Comment »