Two Ukip Thanet Councillors Helen Smith & Konnor Collins, In Court On Theft Charges and more!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Hi,
.
Thanet councillor Helen Smith, from Ramsgate, appears at Canterbury Crown Court accused of stealing and assault
01 June 2016
by Paul Hooper
A Thanet district councillor has appeared in court today accused of stealing from a garden centre.
Helen Smith, 52, of St John’s Avenue, Ramsgate is also accused of assaulting Kerry Walker, a member of staff at Wyevale Garden Centre in April last year.
Smith denied charges of stealing £847 worth of goods, assault and driving dangerously in the garden centre car park.
Helen Smith
Also charged is fellow councillor Kevan Collins – known as Konnor – who faces a joint charge of shoplifting at the same store.
Collins, 54, also of St John’s Avenue, was too ill to appear at Canterbury Crown Court today.
His lawyer, Phil Rowley, told Judge Simon James his client is in the QEQM Hospital.
Konnor Collins. Picture: Tony Flashman
The trial was set for September 5 and both were granted bail until then.
For more details of this dishonest pair of scoundrels CLICK HERE, you will soon realise just how utterly incompetent Ukip are in tyhe fielf of politics making such an unproffesional and inept selection as candidates!
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
Hermann Kelley is not only on the long term permanent staff of Ukip but Nigel Farage’s political advisor! Also it transpires that he is Ukip’s IRA Supporter Of Terrorist Murders
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
UKIP Press Officer Hermann Kelly Exposed As Terrorist Sympathiser
A key aide to Nigel Farage is a hardline Irish Republican who was caught spending a boozy night in a Brussels bar as other drinkers sang pro-IRA songs, the Daily Mirror has reported.
Londonderry-born Hermann Kelly was pictured sitting among a 10-strong party in the Ketje pub just moments from the European Parliament, where he is the UKIP leader’s most senior political adviser.
During a near 45-minute rendition the group belted out openly inflammatory songs, including one written after a bid to blow up the RUC, which called on England to “take your murderers out of Ireland”.
When quizzed about the gathering by the Sunday Mirror, Kelly insisted he had been drinking with three UKIP party employees. But he finally admitted sitting at the same table as the pro-IRA group – who he described as a visiting delegation – adding: “I know two of these people. I’m sitting here having a drink”.
Kelly, UKIP ’s Director of Communications in Brussels, was introduced to a Daily Mirror reporter by a political pal who joked: “Meet Hermann, the only Irish Republican on Nigel Farage’s payroll. Now that’s a story!”
Confirming that he did hold Republican beliefs, Kelly said this stemmed from his roots in Northern Ireland’s second largest city and asked: “What else do you expect from a man from Derry?”Insisting his views represented “Irish Catholic nationalism” he likened the Irish cause to that of the Brexit campaign in next month’s EU referendum, saying: “Self-determination is what it’s all about.”
Kelly claimed that Farage was aware of his sympathies.
Like Farage, Kelly has blamed “the horrific act of terrorism” in Brussels which killed 34 people on EU migration rules.
Kelly is a former editor of The Irish Catholic, a newspaper founded by Timothy Daniel Sullivan, who was convicted and jailed for crimes relating to his Republican activities.
#Ukip #MEP’s Apparent Abuse Of Office Seeks EU Shelter From British Justice, having been found to have criminally libeled & slandered 3 British MPs alleging their involvement in Rotheram Sexual abuse of 1,400 children!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
in what would seem to be a flagrant abuse of Ukip’s stated principles and seeming abuse of her elected office Ukip MEP Jane Collins seeks to use EU to overturn British Justice to make it possible for her to libel & slander 3 British MPs.
I am also given to understand that in her efforts to avoid British Justice she claimed to the Court
‘oh the EU is not so bad’
thus seemingly bringing the claims of Ukip to believe in BreXit into complete disrepute and disarray in her personal interest to try to justify her libel and slander and wriggle out of a liability for damages and costs likely to exceed £1/2 Million!
News: UKIP MEP fails in attempt to rely on European Parliamentary immunity to avoid English libel action.
Ms Collins was sued for libel by three Rotherham Labour MPs over a speech she gave at the UKIP conference in September 2014. In a judgment given in April 2015 (Barron MP & Ors v Collins MEP[2015] EWHC 1125), Warby J concluded that the speech meant, inter alia, that
“each of the three Rotherham MPs “knew many of the details of the scandalous child sexual exploitation that took place in Rotherham over a period of sixteen years, in the course of which an estimated 1,400 children were raped, beaten, plied with alcohol and drugs, and threatened with violence by men of Asian origin, yet deliberately chose not to intervene but to allow the abuse to continue.” [32]
On 26 May 2015, Ms Collins made an offer of amends – offering to make a suitable correction and apology and to pay damages and costs. The parties could not agree the amount of compensation and a hearing was listed for 18 December 2015.
Ms Collins successfully applied to adjourn that hearing on the ground that she was unwell. She also made an “Application to Vacate” the offer of amends. A hearing of that application – and if, it was unsuccessful of the assessment of compensation under the offer of amends – was fixed for 16 May 2016.
On 3 May 2016, Ms Collins wrote to the President of the European Parliament requesting Parliament to defend her immunity as an MEP. She claimed that she was being sued for expressing an opinion whilst carrying out her duties as an MEP.
On 10 May 2016 Ms Collins wrote to the Court (but not to the claimants) seeking a stay of the libel action. Warby J directed that this application should be communicated to the claimants and for written submissions on the stay application.
On 16 May 2016, the Court heard oral argument on the issue of a stay. Ms Collins relied on Article 8 of the “Privileges and Immunities of the European Union” which provides that
“Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties”.
Reference was made to rules 5, 7 and 9 of the European Parliament Rules of Procedure. The Court was also referred to the cases of Marra v De Gregorioand Aldo Patriciello.
Warby J gave judgment dismissing the application for a stay. He noted that Member states had a duty of sincere co-operation with EU institautions – a duty reflected in Article 4(3) of the the 2009 Treaty on European Union. As a result, as noted in Marra v De Gregorio
“where an action has been brought against a Member of the European Parliament before a national court and that court is informed that a procedure for defence of the privileges and immunities of that Member, as provided for in Article 6(3) of the Rules of Procedure, has been initiated, that court must stay the judicial proceedings and request the Parliament to issue its opinion as soon as possible” [43].
Although the Court was not bound by the opinion of the Parliament, once it had been informed that the immunities procedure had been initiated it was bound to wait for the opinion and stay the proceedings in the meantime.
Nevertheless, he concluded that in the present case, the Court had not yet been “informed” within the meaning of Marra. There had been no formal communication to the court from Parliament. As a result, the hearing continued. A copy of the judge’s judgment was sent to the European Parliament.
It is perhaps surprising to see a UKIP MEP seeking to rely on European Law to stay an English libel action. It will be interesting to see whether Parliament now raises a formal immunity communication and, if so, what its opinion is on the immunity issue.
[Update: Stay now granted]
On 17 May 2016, the President of the European Parliament wrote to the Court stating that the immunity procedure had been initiated and, as a result, Warby J granted a stay pending receipt of the Parliament’s opinion. He made an order that Ms Collins pay the costs thrown away by the late stay application.
Ukip MEP’s Libel & Slander Likely To Cost Her Upwards of £1/2Million having accused 3 Labour MPs of involvement in the Rotheram child sex cover-ups!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi.
I do believe that it is reasonable to consider announcing ones accusations that the MPs of an opposing party were involved in a cover up of child grouming rape and sexual abuse in a depraved and criminal manner, naming the MPs yet failing to provide any evidence or proof from a stage at a party political rally is more than a tad foolish – not to mention criminal.
To then try to claim such an action to be acceptable as an extension of Parliamentary priviledge is downright stupid!
Those who know anything about the history of Ukip will be aware that there is no such thing as Parliamentary privilege in the so called EU Parliament, when it comes to false accusations that can be construed as libelous or slanderous, being aware of the fines levied on Nigel Farage having merely insulted the newly appointed flunkey van Rumpey – an insult made in the self styled EU Parliament let alone on a Party Political stage for political gain!
It does all too clearly seem that Jane Collins had sunk to gutter politics, in what seems all too common in Ekip, by believing it was acceptable to libel and slander political rivals without a shred of evidence or an iota of caveat in her claim of their involvement in support of the sexual abuse of children in their constituencies!
I guess Jane Collins can consider herself fortunate when you consider a minor sleb in America was awarded $115 Million against Gawker Media for having had his perfidious sexual behaviour made public – just imagine what he would have been awarded had he been accused of any involvement in sexual abuse of multiple children!
Ukip MEP bids to avoid paying damages over remarks about MPs
A Ukip MEP who was sued over remarks she made about Rotherham’s three Labour MPs in relation to the town’s child abuse scandal has made an attempt to avoid paying compensation.
A Ukip MEP who was sued over remarks she made about Rotherham’s three Labour MPs in relation to the town’s child abuse scandal has made an attempt to avoid paying compensation.
Sir Kevin Barron, MP for Rother Valley, John Healey, who represents Wentworth and Dearne, and Sarah Champion, MP for Rotherham, brought High Court proceedings against Jane Collins, MEP for Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire.
Their claim for slander and libel arose from a speech Ms Collins gave at Ukip’s conference in September 2014 – a month after a report found that about 1,400 children in the area had been abused between 1997 and 2013.
A year ago, Mr Justice Warby made findings on meaning – after which Ms Collins, who was legally represented at the time, made an offer of amends which was accepted.
The judge said that her words meant, as an allegation of fact, that each of the MPs knew many of the details of the exploitation yet deliberately chose not to intervene but allowed it to continue.
They also meant, as expressions of opinion, that they acted in this way for motives of political correctness, political cowardice or political selfishness and that they were guilty of misconduct so grave that it was or should be criminal, as it aided the perpetrators and made the MPs just as culpable.
Lawyers for Ms Collins had argued that it was a political speech which did not contain any allegation of fact, but expressed an opinion to the effect that the MPs were likely to have known that sexual exploitation was a serious problem in the area.
The amount of compensation could not be agreed so the case came back to court in London on Monday for the judge to assess damages – which the claimants say should be in the region of £150,000 each.
But, Ms Collins, who is now acting in person, claimed she did not give informed consent to an offer of amends and there was no proper acceptance as the parties were unable to agree on any of its elements.
She said she was under the impression that her lawyers were going to robustly contest the claim and there were defences available.
Gavin Millar, QC for the MPs, said her application to set aside the agreement was not genuine, but was another attempt to “derail” the litigation and avoid paying compensation.
He said: “It is simply an attempt to get out of the bargain she made and yet another example of her inability to accept the consequences of her own actions.”
The judge, who earlier rejected Ms Collins’s bid to get the proceedings stayed on the basis of EU parliamentary immunity, will give his ruling tomorrow.
Allegation of Anal Rape Of A Young #Ukip Volunteer By A Ukip MEP In The Press, which had been reported to Ukip Chairman by the girl who claimed to be the victim is now in the national press & not just the Thurrock Gazette!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
it is astonishing how lax the media are when it comes to sexual assault of women by those in some form of elected authority.
Yet in otherr instances they are all over the alleged miscreant like a cheap suit!
You may well have noted that when the notoriously dishonest and corrupt thief Annabelle Fuller having been caught leaving an MP’s flat having stolen his Blackberry phone, some cofidential letters and his House of Commons pass, and having admitted to her criminality after a day drinking and having, according to an MEP who was present in the pub, targeted the MP specifically she made false accusations that the MP had tried to ‘fondle’ her – this story by Annabelle Fuller, who has now changed her name to avoid identification with her past, was plastered all over the national media.
The publicity given of the true victim in that case, who was Andrew Bridgen, contributed to his being divorced and estranged from his own children – yet in the case of the Ukip MEP Tim Aker – also a fairly obscure politician the matter seems to have been hushed up or at best ignored by the media!
Why was Andrew Bridgen pilloried by the media based on a false allegation made by an untrustworthy thief yet when one of the young Ukip volunteers reports an actual rape and an anal rape at that near silence!
It makes one wonder what other crimes are being hushed up in the light of the various allegations being talked of, regarding Tim Aker, and was his so called foundation a charity with more similarity to those of Jimmy Saville than any legitimate charity!
Police search home of Ukip MEP Tim Aker after sex assault claim
Interview: Tim Aker spoke to detectives Glenn Copus
The home of Ukip MEP Tim Aker has been searched by police investigating allegations of sexual assault, the Standard can reveal.
Officers searched the house in Grays, Essex, with Mr Aker’s consent, after a former Ukip activist contacted police alleging that the East of England MEP had attacked her.
Mr Aker, 30, who has been an MEP since 2014 and was previously head of Ukip’s policy unit, voluntarily attended a police interview over the claim. The alleged attack is said to have taken place last September after a Ukip event attended by party leader Nigel Farage.
The woman first complained to party chairman Steve Crowther in December and it is understood last month she decided to make a police report after being disappointed with the outcome of the Ukip national executive committee’s review of her complaint.
Officers conducted a video interview with her on April 26 and three days later searched Mr Aker’s home in his presence. Essex police are also investigating an allegation of malicious communications after the alleged victim reported that letters about her and Mr Aker had been sent anonymously to politicians and members of the public. Mr Aker is also understood to have complained to police about the letters.
An Essex police spokeswoman said: “Norfolk police were contacted on April 26 with a report of a sexual assault which took place in Essex… Police inquiries are continuing.”
A spokesman for Ukip said Mr Aker denied the sexual assault allegation against him.
For additional facts including details of other victims
if/when they become legally publishable CLICK HERE
You will note that at this stage we are NOT publishing the name or details of the victim of the claim, unlike those who circulated her name with her picture via the Royal Mail!
.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
Ukip Cornwall (South West) Seems As Corrupt As Ever! When it comes to corruption and internal squabbling little changes in Ukip over the years.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Hi,
the story of Ukip in the South West has been an ongoing debacle for a number of years, right back to when Gawain Towler was dumped by the SW Committee as their candidate because of the facts pertaining to his sexual arousal by his own daughter whilst bathing with her – then the total disregard for democracy within Ukip when he was reinstated a couple of days later by Nigel Farage and promoted within the party.
Meanwhile this was the time when Nigel Farage orchestrated – nay invented – a witch hunt to remove Dr. Eric Edmonds who had been elected by the people of the SW both as their representative on the National Ukip NEC as with Dr. David Abbott – they were dishonestly ousted by Nigel Farage and cronies who feared their efforts to make the party both more accountable and more transparent by for the members.
This was also at the time that the scoundrel Malcolm Wood was colluding behind the backs of elected Ukip committees to engineer his own choices for positions within the party to assist the corruption and the continued dominence of Nigel Farage rendering the party as something of a one man band with individuals like Douglas Denny corrupting internal selection processes and elections aided by low lifes like of Mark Croucher & Mick McGough.
Meanwhile it seemed that some in control were robbing the party blind – viz less than 15% of the money collected via Ashworth Call Centre ever reaching the party (described by Nigel Farage as Ukip’s best ever fund raising scheme).
It was around that time that this web site disclosed the fact that Nigel Farage had set up an off shore trust in The Isle of Man and had in one deposit alone invested £250,000 in the tax haven!
UKIP’s rotten ‘Camborne Redruth and Hayle’ branch in Cornwall was supposed to be shut down after the election due to abject failure to achieve by-election sucess (23% REVERSAL in Pendarves, Camborne) not to mention almost total collapse of the branch during general election campaign, ousting of the branch Chairman and other officals by a cabal led by Cornwall Councilor Harry Blakeley – who then took over the branch himself!
Steve Crowther for reasons unknown made a “180 degree u-turn” and decided to bin the idea and keep the branch open! Nobody knows why, apart from Crowther!
Since then UKIP Cornwall has been a “distaster zone”, and is at the centre of a dispute with members over Anti-Semitic messages eminating from the St Ives branch. Crowther’s failures have caused MAJOR donors to pull out of UKIP funding, including personal friends of Nigel Farage in the Duchy who we, we are reliably informed, are “disgusted” with UKIP’s failure to do anything about these problems!
Local activists that attempted to deal with these issues were given no support from Crowther or UKIP Cornwall Council leader Steph McWilliams, in fact the party threatened those loyal members who attempted to deal with rampant corruption and anti-semitism with disiplinary action should they dare speak of it in public!
From: Steve Crowther <sjcrowther@btinternet.com> Sent: 29 June 2015 15:14 To: REDACTED Subject: Re: URGENT – Closing Camborne Hayle Redruth
Dear REDACTED
If Camborne, Redruth & Hayle branch has irreconcilable disputes or is failing to find adequate leadership, you have my permission to suspend the committee and take it into regional control, under rule B.7.2. However, I recommend identifying a caretaker chairman to keep the home fires burning.
Regards, Steve
—
Steve Crowther
Chairman, UK Independence Party (UKIP)
Disclaimer
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed should not be regarded as, and are not intended to be, legal or other advice and are solely those of the author, they are not intended for publication and do not necessarily represent those of the UK Independence Party or the EFDD Group. Any third party email addresses that may be displayed in this email may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system without the written permission of the UK Independence Party or the sender. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
From: REDACTED
Date: Monday, 29 June 2015 11:57
To: Steve Crowther <sjcrowther@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: URGENT – Closing Camborne Hayle Redruth
Steve,
Just to be clear, does your comment below “I am sure you are right” equate to your written permission to close this dysfunctional branch? Unfortunately, the miscommunication, trouble-making & negativity coming out of CHR is invariably widely copied to other members & branches by the Chairman & undermines UKIP’s good name. I have always done my best by the Party & will take this step in the interests of the EU Referendum as I close down tomorrow if I have your backing. As you know, I drafted the letters to the committee & membership several days ago.
By the way, I will be attending the Taunton County meeting this evening as it seems the professional & proper thing to do!
A meeting was arranged so that members could voice their concerns, alas, the meeting was “spolied” by St Ives Chairman Guppy, Camborne Chairman Blakeley, plus an univited guest. The police were almost called to the meeting. Result? PROMOTION of Mr Guppy to “Vice Chairman of the County” a position that does not exist within UKIP!
I’m not sure why you’ve written to me, or any of the other recipients of your ludicrous email.
Let me give you some advice and guidance:
For a start, get your facts right. The person who wrote the minutes for the meeting on the 16th of September, was RO Guy Parfitt. I have re read the meagre account that Guy submitted as being the Minutes for this meeting, and can find no mention of “that woman”. See attachment.
Your version of the events, and with regard to the disruption that you, Blakeley and the woman caused at the start of the meeting, is complete rubbish. There is a full transcript of every word spoken during this 20 minute period of the meeting. This transcript exposes the fact that you have been blatantly misleading others into believing yours and Blakeley’s version of events.
I suggest we meet up at your next branch meeting and discuss this matter openly. Michael Muldowney would be happy to attend as well, and we’d be more than willing to present the transcript, plus other evidence…. can we agree to do this ?, after all, It’s only right that having copied so many in on this matter, that they should know the truth, and you will have the opportunity to prove me wrong, I think not!!!
I also attach another damning comment regarding the perceived disgusting behaviour on the part of all three of you. See attachment. I think this comment sums up the general consensus of opinion from those who were at the meeting, and were unfortunately subjected to yours, Blakeley’s, and the woman’s obnoxious behaviour, in not only attempting to shut the meeting down, but by using the woman to do it. (Gutless is word that springs to mind) All three of you slunk away from the building after being told to leave. This of course can be fully verified by the security staff. The business of the meeting then continued without further disruption.
My advice, You thought you could cause problems, and disrupt the meeting. You succeeded for Twenty minutes in delaying the agenda for the evening. I’m not sure what cost benefits you derived from this futile exercise, but let me assure you that your irrational behaviour does more harm than good, so start acting in a more professional manner, or perhaps, just retire gracefully. The same advice is available to Chm Blakeley.
On another subject, and given the working relationship that you enjoy with Chm Blakeley, I have attached a message that I received from Steve Crowther on the 30th of June, giving permission to put CR&H branch into special measures by removing Harry Blakeley as Chairman of the branch. This came about as a result of a direct instruction from Nigel Farage at a meeting earlier this year.
There were issues during the GE campaign that precluded this edict from being implemented immediately, however, action with regard to this subject is ongoing, and hopefully will be concluded shortly.
Oops, you requested an apology, the answers no, but if you accept the proposed meeting, I’ll more than willingly apologise if I’m proved to be wrong, much as you will, ‘ve no doubt, when your proven wrong!
I look forward to your acceptance e-mail, please include the date, time, and venue for the meeting.
Subject: Re: A meeting to disclose the facts behind the current impasse.
From: dlucas290990@icloud.com
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:48:03 +0000
CC: REDACTED
To: REDACTED
Dear REDACTED
Thanks for the email. Once again, I have taken the liberty of copying this to REDACTED – as I did previously without adverse comment from you – since you may well agree that he should not be kept in the dark.
You say: ‘The opportunity to deal with the ongoing problems on an amicable basis is long gone.’ and ‘…there is little hope of dealing with these issues “in house’ thereby protecting UKIP’s image’. Since you have not specifically mentioned the possible meeting of the three of us I take this to mean that you do not now want to pursue that line. The phrase “in house” is ambiguous: do you mean within the Cornwall Committee, or within UKIP writ large? I suspect the former, in which case – after having spent hours reading much material including MM’s detailed dossier – I agree with you. I am sure you do not mean the latter – to bring up the issue outside Party channels – since that could only harm the Party and do more harm than good.
Yesterday (9 Dec) I discussed the issues with Steve Crowther and he has made the following rulings:
He has investigated the various complaints made primarily by you but also REDACTED against Harry Blakely and Stuart Guppy, and has decided that they do not provide grounds for Party disciplinary action.
If you or REDACTED wish to take these complaints further, you should do so using the Disciplinary Procedures laid down in the Party Constitution and Rule Book. You should get the appropriate forms from Diane Belk, and send them in duplicate when completed to David Chalice at Lexdrum. He will then initiate the necessary procedures within the Disciplinary Committee.
This dispute is not to be further discussed in Cornwall County Committee meetings.
This dispute should not receive any public airing outside UKIP channels. Any attempt to do so – e.g. promulgating anything relating to them in social media – could subject the perpetrator to Party disciplinary action,
The way ahead then is twofold. The County Committee will not discuss these old disputes, but will get on with other important County business. Meanwhile you or REDACTED or both are free to table a complaint under the Party Constitution and Rules as I have previously mentioned more than once. As I understand it, neither Harry nor Stuart is planning to resign; therefore the only ways to remove them are for their branch to vote them out, or for them to be removed by the Party Discipline Committee following a substantiated complaint. There is no formal action that the County Chairman or Committee can take, so there is no point in discussing the issue in County meetings. I agree with you that rotten apples should be eliminated, but this must be through the laid-down procedures.
Finally – a minor point that is not relevant to the main issue – I do not see that I have to ‘defend’ myself for accepting the County Chairman role without knowing all the facts. I accepted nomination reluctantly because I wanted to find out the facts and do all I could to defuse the issue so that Cornwall could get on with its main aims. Formerly, as a non-member of the Committee I was aware of the dispute, but had no locus standi to question people on the issue. As Chairman I had a mandate to do so. Following Steve’s rulings, I no longer need to exercise it.
Whether the above material, which flags up many points made on this web site elsewhere, was supplied to me now because it is ongoing (from what I hear it is) or because there is an election in process I leave to you to speculate.
Do also consider this critique of Ukip Cornwall, firast published on 11-Apr-2016:
FULL COLLAPSE OF ENTIRE #UKIP CORNWALL AS ANOTHER COUNCILLOR QUITS
Cornwall might be on the periphery of the UK, but when it comes to UKIP it is central to their plans – and for those of us who keep tabs, an interesting barometer of UKIP fortunes. ‘Kipper’ success in the Duchy was at one time promoted heavily by the party, after it ‘won’ the 2014 EU elections with 37% of the vote in the county, it also returned the party six seats in 2013’s local elections.
Cornwall: Lots of elderly retirees, and by the sea. Perfect Ukip territory, you’d think.
The county has a unitary authority council running it, and there is high support for a Cornish assembly that would maximise devolved powers replacing the existing system, and although UKIP are against it, at one time they conceivably could have won seats in the proposed ‘parliament’.
This money has been used to fund infrastructure and education, however, UKIP wish to do away with it and despite claims they would replace it we’re yet to see any costed, serious, plans.
With the news that UKIP Cornwall Councillor Mark Hicks has quit, the party’s local representatives have fallen to just two, from the original six.
We have already covered the situation with racism and anti-Semitism in our previous articles, and with UKIP’s utter unprofessionalism and repeated gaffes in Cornwall we feel they are totally unelectable.
This should be a warning for anybody considering voting for UKIP as their local representative.
Here is our run down of UKIP’s Cornish Council failures.
MICHAEL KEOGH – Elected to a ward in the Falmouth and Truro area, Keogh became the first of the six to quit just months after the election. No official explanation from UKIP was given but rumours circulated about his health issues, which we are told were legitimate.
VIV LEWIS – Lewis claimed he was a paper candidate who just happened to get elected (by 12 votes) and in his mid-eighties when he came to office. Immediately involved in public bout of racism, he claimed he couldn’t be racist because he had “been to the West Indies on holiday”. He resigned in 2015 and his seat was won by Labour. Mr Lewis passed away in January of this year.
DEREK ELLIOTT – We’re told Elliott is a “solid councillor and a good chap”. A 2010 PPC who had a good profile in his constituency, he was pushed aside for ‘big draw’ Bob Smith, a personal friend of Nigel Farage for the Camborne/Redruth target seat. Still remains a Cornwall Councillor but we are told he won’t be running again in 2017.
STEPHANIE McWILLIAMS – Long term UKIP insider and former party health spokeswoman who has done the rounds on regional and county committees. Led the council election campaign on a pledge to oppose house building, but then voted for a 45,000 increase anyway. A lame duck since the housing vote, McWilliams was also involved in the anti-Semitic cover up in St Ives (see our previous articles) which caused donors to withdraw £100k in funding and support. We’re are also told she “did nothing” to support her general election candidate. She has since resigned her chairmanship of South East Cornwall and does not plan to seek re-election in 2017.
Ukip Thurrock In Some Difficulty! With communications claimed to be from their Councillor James Baker leading to his suspension & Tim Aker Ukip MEP & Cllr. under police investigation – what next?
A THURROCK UKIP councillor has been suspended after an allegation that he sent offensive e-mails to a local resident.
Copies of e-mails allegedly sent by East Tilbury councillor, James Baker, appeared on a Facebook page called “Your East Tilbury”.
A resident opened a thread stating that they were appalled at the communication sent to them by cllr Baker, who was elected as a councillor in May 2015.
The resident put the conversation in context as they alleged that the correspondence related to incidents at the Bata Club in East Tilbury on Friday night (April 29th).
The resident only published extracts of communication made from cllr Baker’s Thurrock Council e mail address but they included a stream of foul and abusive language including the line “F… you and f… all of you.”
The e-mails appear to be from jxbaker@thurrock.gov.uk
The resident did not publish their part (if any) of the e-mail conversation.
YT has contacted both cllr Baker and the Thurrock UKIP group leader, Graham Snell in order that they may put their side of the story.
A Thurrock UKIP spokesperson said: “Cllr James Baker has been suspended pending an internal investigation.”
Thurrock Council has confirmed to YT that they are aware of the e-mails.
The Facebook thread has been taken down.
YT has reached out to the “complainer” but they have yet to reply.
Is Farage Playing A Double Game as he milks the system for all he can?
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Is Farage Playing A Double Game?
May 3rd, 2016.
If the man had any sense of humility whatsoever, Nigel Farage, the leader of the UK Independence Party (UKIP), who has consistently condemned EU politicians for wasting taxpayer’s money, might feel somewhat embarrassed about revelations that he has been charging said taxpayers as much as £15,000 per day for his own personal security.
Secura Associates, a firm hired to provide bodyguards to Farage, was tasked with arranging security for his attendance at political events. Their duties allegedly included ensuring that “adequate refreshments” were made available to him. Those who know Farage well may smile at that.
The company, which employs a number of former soldiers, charged some £58,000 over a relatively short period of time for providing security at a small number of events, many of which were barely attended.
What is most interesting about this story, which was reported in the Daily Mail as well as other media, is that the information provided – specifically documentary evidence of costs incurred and claimed for – could only have come from the Secretariat of Farage’s political group, the so-called Europe of Freedom & Direct Democracies (EFDD) within the European Parliament itself. This attack on Farage is an inside job.
Also, the specific details concerning attendance numbers at events for which security was provided, at great expense to the taxpayer, point to the source being a UKIP insider with access to both European Parliament papers, and UKIP internal reports.
This may suggest a disgruntled employee who has sufficient intellect to have tired of being a Yes Man to Farage, or it may indicate the rumblings of a wider internal coup.
Otherwise, it may tell us that Farage has unwittingly employed yet another Tory whose true allegiance rests with the Conservative Party which is now at odds with him over the issue of Brexit.
Of course, EU Today is well aware of the source.
There are attempts ongoing in the UKIP camp to silence dissent, and indeed to prevent staff speaking to unapproved journalists. There are “strong arm tactics being applied by an EFDD official with former Irish Republican terrorist links”, according to more than one source.
The apparent lack of integrity of the UKIP leadership may become a major factor in the outcome of the Brexit vote, and may contribute to the vote to remain in the EU: But perhaps that is how it was always intended to be…….
Farage’s £15,000 a day bodyguards… on the taxpayer: Ukip leader branded a ‘hypocrite’ after using EU money to fund team of ex-military personnel – while attacking wasteful spending by Brussels
Security firm guarding Nigel Farage sent hefty bills to European Parliament
Its checklist of tasks included ‘ensuring refreshments have been arranged’
Team accompanied MEP at great expense throughout his nationwide tour
Opponents called Farage a ‘hypocrite’ for seemingly extravagant spending
PUBLISHED: 23:24, 1 May 2016 | UPDATED: 13:03, 2 May 2016
Nigel Farage has claimed up to £15,000 a day in taxpayer-funded expenses for bodyguards, it can be revealed today.
The Ukip leader used EU funds to pay for a team of ex-military personnel to follow him around the country as he made referendum campaign speeches.
Documents leaked to the Mail show how the security firm, whose guards have previously protected Sir Elton John, sent a series of hefty bills to the European Parliament for its services. A checklist of tasks included ‘ensuring refreshments have been arranged’ for Mr Farage.
Protected: Ukip leader Nigel Farage has been branded a ‘hypocrite’ for claiming up to £15,000 a day in taxpayer-funded expenses for bodyguards
The team, led by a former military police officer who served in Afghanistan, accompanied the MEP at great expense through his tour – even when he was speaking in front of only a few hundred people.
Mr Farage, who has repeatedly criticised wasteful EU spending, racked up a security bill of £58,000 for just five events held in modest venues such as a darts arena in Essex where there was not a single demonstrator. Opponents last night branded him a ‘hypocrite’ as he confirmed the seemingly extravagant spending.
The European Parliament refused to condemn the payments, saying it was up to Mr Farage how his Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy group (EFDD) spent its £2.5 million-a-year EU funding.
Mr Farage embarked on the ‘Say No to the EU’ tour – a series of public meetings he described as ‘the largest Eurosceptic campaign perhaps ever seen’ – in the final four months of last year.
Leaked paperwork shows how Secura Associates, the firm hired to provide bodyguards to Mr Farage in the run-up to the General Election, was tasked with arranging security for the events.
WHY IT COSTS US SO MUCH TO PROTECT HIM
Threat assessments produced by Secura Associates and submitted to the European Parliament to justify the hefty bills included how it was necessary to have enough guards to create a decoy and ensure there were adequate refreshments for Mr Farage.
In the documents, leaked to the Mail, the firm said the assessments had ‘been conducted based on historic events, current open-source intelligence and liaison with local law enforcement agencies’.
They claimed it was necessary ‘to assess all potential risks and weigh these against the security measures we can employ to negate them – prevention being better than cure’.
The firm set out how a ‘venue security team leader’, ‘team members’ and ‘intelligence-gathering staff’ were needed for each event. It added: ‘Our aim is not simply to stop an attack or a protest – we are there to prevent harm from whatever source befalling our principal and event delegates’.
A checklist of actions to be carried out by the security officers included ‘ensuring refreshments have been arranged’.
Despite the relatively small size of some of the venues, the company charged at least £9,000 for each appearance.
As Mr Farage kicked off the tour at the Emmanuel Hall in Westminster, security cost £15,000, even though it was claimed there were just 15 protesters outside.
For a speech on September 7 at the Winter Gardens in Margate, Kent – the scene of the Ukip leader’s election defeat four months earlier – the company charged £9,000.
The next week, Mr Farage flew to Belfast to speak at a hotel in the city, where according to the local party, ‘a packed house of 300 people were in attendance’.
Northern Irish police provided armed officers outside the venue, yet according to a bill addressed to Mr Farage’s group in the European Parliament, Secura charged £10,000 for its services.
Three days later, as Mr Farage spoke at a darts arena in Purfleet, Essex, the sum was again £10,000. Organisers said there were no demonstrators at the venue, which is downstairs from a strip club.
Additional spending records for the tour show £14,000 was charged for an event in Gateshead on October 12. It is thought the security firm provided about ten close- protection officers for each event.
The EFDD group, which funded the tour, last night confirmed the £58,000 security bill was charged to the taxpayer through its allowances. A spokesman for the group, which is made up of Ukip MEPs and Eurosceptics from other countries, said: ‘All spending on the speaking tour in late 2015 came out of the delegation budget in conformity to the rules. Everything is completely above board and was done before the regulated referendum period.’
Guy Verhofstadt exposes Nigel Farage as a gravy train rider
Mr Farage, who has repeatedly criticised wasteful EU spending, racked up a security bill of £58,000 for just five events held in modest venues such as a darts arena in Essex where there was not a single demonstrator
He added: ‘Incidents have demonstrated that as a high-profile figure, Nigel Farage needs professional security cover.’
But Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said last night: ‘Once again Ukip have been found taking the British taxpayer for a ride. Nigel Farage complains about EU funding but he’s got no qualms about using it for his own ends.’
Tory MP Damian Collins said: ‘For Nigel Farage to complain about EU waste while billing European taxpayers for the costs of his tour is the height of hypocrisy. It is very clear that the people of Britain cannot trust Farage and his crew with what is best for our country.’
In a book published last year, Mr Farage wrote about hiring James Woolfenden, the owner of Secura Associates, who he described as a ‘former British Army man’.
Mr Farage said the appointment was ‘unavoidable’ after he was forced to retreat to a pub in Edinburgh in 2013 when confronted by dozens of protesters.
The Secura Associates website describes the company as ‘a global team of dedicated security industry professionals, offering a complete range of security, surveillance and investigational services to a diverse portfolio of clients’.
Published: 13:37, 3 May 2016 | Updated: 13:37, 3 May 2016
Ukip leader Nigel Farage has denied using British taxpayers’ cash to pay for bodyguards.
Mr Farage was speaking after the Daily Mail reported Ukip used EU money to fund £58,000 worth of security at five events last autumn.
The Ukip leader insisted the money was not for his personal protection, but to pay for security at party meetings.
Nigel Farage is the leader of Ukip
Asked if it was a good use of public funds, Mr Farage said: “It’s not public money, I get zero public money from this country. The fact that the Germans help subsidise our public meetings in this country through their EU contributions – justified entirely.”
Mr Farage, who complains that British taxpayers send £350 million to Brussels each week, said he gets no help from the UK Government for his protection.
“I am the only party leader, or senior political figure, who gets no help, zero help, from the British Government, even after my family was attacked last year, I get no help at all.
“So, we have to fund the whole thing privately, which for a party the size of ours is very difficult indeed,” Mr Farage said.
The Ukip leader insisted the costs involved related to “big public events” held by the party.
“That’s less about me and more about the crowds that come, and making sure they are checked, and searched, and that good people who come along to attend political meetings can do so feeling safe.
“Do any of our other MEP’s hold public meetings around the country where anyone can come? No,” Mr Farage said.
One of the events where security costs were claimed for was held in a darts arena in Essex where there were no protesters , and duties for personnel included “ensuring refreshments have been arranged”, according to the Daily Mail.
The Ukip leader’s remarks came he unveiled a new election poster outside EU offices in London ahead of this week’s elections in the capital.
“Breakthrough Thursday – that’s what we are after. At the moment we have no representation in London, Cardiff, Belfast, or Edinburgh, and I am absolutely confident that we will breakthrough into London, Wales, Northern Ireland – and Scotland, there’s a real chance too.
“According to the opinion polls we are pretty much the highest we have ever been in the history of the party,” Mr Farage said.
The money came from £2.5 million allocated by the EU to the Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy (EFDD) grouping in the European Parliament of which Ukip is a member.
The Daily Mail reported that a European Parliament official said it was up to the group how it spent the money given to it by EU taxpayers.
The EFDD funded Mr Farage’s speaking tour, including the security costs.
A spokesman for the group told the newspaper: “All spending on the speaking tour in late 2015 came out of the delegation budget in conformity to the rules. Everything is completely above board and was done before the regulated referendum period.”
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said the spending showed Ukip had taken the British taxpayer “for a ride”.
PUBLISHED: 18:07, Tue, May 3, 2016 | UPDATED: 18:46, Tue, May 3, 2016
PA
Nigel Farage insisted the money was not spent on his own personal protectionThe Ukip leader highlighted attacks on his family as he hit back in a row over whether he used up to £15,000 a day in EU funding to pay for bodyguards.The MEP, who battles against wasteful Brussels spending, has been branded a “hypocrite” after a Daily Mail report claimed Ukip used £58,000 of EU funds to pay for a team of ex-military personnel to follow him around the country at a series of events.But Mr Farage today insisted the money was not spent on his own personal protection but to pay for general public security at events on the ‘Say No to EU’ tour, which took place over the final four months of last year.The Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy (EFDD) group, which sits in the European Parliament and is chaired by Mr Farage, have confirmed they paid for the tour through their £2.5 million-a-year EU funding.Appearing on the BBC’s Daily Politics programme this afternoon, Mr Farage dismissed the ”ridiculous story” as he insisted his personal bodyguards are funded through private money.He said: “I’m the only political leader or, I guess, politician of prominence in the UK who gets zero help from the taxpayer, zero help from the authorities in this country.
“We have asked, particularly after last April when my family were attacked on a Sunday lunchtime which was pretty nasty.”
He added: “I don’t get any help in any way at all.”
I’ve spent 17-and-a-half years using EU funds to try and fight the EU and I shall go on doing so as long as we’re in the EU.
Nigel Farage
The Ukip leader claimed without his personal security team he “wouldn’t be here” as “the hard-Left have been so vicious and so nasty”.Two sepearate Ukip sources later told Express.co.uk knives had been found by security at previous party events, including at one event as recently as last month.Describing the number of political events he attends each day, Mr Farage said: “I have to have people to drive me and look after me, that’s reasonable. We fund all of that through private donations.
“I’ve never used a penny of my European allowances, which I get to employ staff, to do security.”
Mr Farage denied the money was spent on his own bodyguards but on “expensive” general security at “big public events that we were holding in this country”.
Hitting back at claims of hypocrisy, he added: “I’ve spent 17-and-a-half years using EU funds to try and fight the EU and I shall go on doing so as long as we’re in the EU.
“But hopefully we’ll vote for Brexit, I’ll be redundant, there’ll be no need.
“I’m the turkey that will happily vote for Christmas.”
Tom Maddick•SWNS
An EFDD spokesman said: “All spending on the speaking tour in late 2015 came out of the delegation budget in conformity to the rules.
“Everything is completely above board and was done before the regulated referendum period.”
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said the spending showed Ukip had taken the British taxpayer “for a ride”.
The exposing of Nigel Farage, his implausible and contradictory denial & his bigging himself up following one immediately after the other reads like a script for the step caller in a Hokey Cokey!
One is forced to wonder if this is a ruse by his fan club to make him seem important – just who would see him as sufficiently relevant to assault, in serious terms, let alone his claims of potential assasination. Lets face it after 23 years of espousing anti EU membership he and his cult following have failed to come up with any type of responsible, workable & costed EU withdrawall and survival strategy for these United Kingdoms – so implausible is his position that he is replicating all of the mistakes made by the BreXiteers of 1975’s Referendum and he holds no role of substance in the EU Referendum Campaign beyond that which his chum Aaron Banks has bought for him with the help of the sleaze publisher of The Express acting as his praise singer in corruption of the basic tennets of honest journalism!
.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
I Understand Ukip’s MEP Tim (Timur) Aker Has Been Questioned! There is more to this than meets the eye, it seems one of his ex-girlfriends has been named & photo used in allegations that a political rival has used for gain – in breech of article 106 of Representation of the Peoples Act!
Norfolk Police were contacted on April 26 with a report of a sexual assault which took place in Essex. Essex Police are investigating this allegation and an allegation of malicious communications relating to letters being sent to a number of individuals. A 30-year-old man from Grays has been voluntarily interviewed and police enquiries are continuing.
I regret I can not now publish a copy of the letter that was circulated, even suitably redacted, norany further details to which I may become privy, however I understand a copy of this statement has now been circulated to other journalists and the story will most likely be published in various national papers and in the local Thurrock newspaper.
I will publish copies of any media material which comes to hand so keep watching Ukip-vs-EUkip
15:40hrs. 02=May-2016
end of additional material
Essex Police launch investigation into “malicious communication” campaign targeting UKIP’s Tim Aker
Essex Police Today at 11:55 AM By YourThurrock
ESSEX Police has launched an investigation after a “malicious communication” targeting
UKIP MEP and Thurrock councillor Tim Aker has been circulated to dozens of politicians and members of the public.
An Essex Police spokesperson said: “Essex Police is investigating an allegation of malicious communications relating to letters being sent to a number of individuals.
“Police were contacted on Thursday 28 April with details of the incident.
“Enquiries are continuing. Anyone who receives a letter they believe to be malicious should report it to police on 101”.
The leader of Thurrock UKIP, cllr Graham Snell has confirmed to YT that they are aware of the matter.
Cllr Snell said: “I am aware of the letter and it’s content. We have passed it to the Police for them to investigate”.
IF you have any evidence that can assist the police in relation to this matter PLEASE pass it on to the Police but do keep copies to ensure that the facts are dealt with!
IF you are concerned, for any reason, at contacting the police by all means send me the material and I will ensure it reaches the police for you, without you being involved.
.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
Ukip Leadership’s Diamond Geezer, may well be minted now but is Seen As A Pain In The Butt By Some!
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
IF you have any evidence that can assist the police in relation to this matter PLEASE pass it on to the Police but do keep copies to ensure that the facts are dealt with!
IF you are concerned, for any reason, at contacting the police, by all means send me the material and I will ensure it reaches the police for you, without you being involved.
Tim Aker Ukip MEP
Additional material added 01:30 hrs. – 20 Sep 2016:
3 May 2016 – The Ukip MEP Tim Aker has been voluntarily interviewed by police in relation to an allegation of sexual assault made against him. … The sexual assault allegedly took place in September last year after a Ukip event in Essex. … A spokeswoman for Essex police said: “Police were …
13 May 2016 – The home of Ukip MEP Tim Aker has been searched by police investigating allegations of sexual assault, the Standard can reveal. Officers …
3 May 2016 – A former Ukip activist made the assault allegation against Tim Aker, … Mr Aker, 30, has been MEP for East of England since 2014, and was …
I Understand Ukip’s MEP Tim (Timur) Aker Has Been Questioned! The full story so far + UPDATES can be found if you CLICK HERE . Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings & Publicise My Blogs To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU . Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP […]
Ukip Leadership’s Diamond Geezer Seen As A Pain In The Butt By Some! . Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings & Publicise My Blogs To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU . Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! . The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque […]
Allegation of Anal Rape Of A Young #Ukip Volunteer By A Ukip MEP In The Press . Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings & Publicise My Blogs To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU . Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! . The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, their anti […]
Ukip Thurrock In Some Difficulty! . Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings & Publicise My Blogs To Spread The Facts World Wide of OUR-ENEMY-WITHIN & To Leave-The-EU . Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! . The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC is what gives the […]
Norfolk Police were contacted on April 26 with a report of a sexual assault which took place in Essex. Essex Police are investigating this allegation and an allegation of malicious communications relating to letters being sent to a number of individuals. A 30-year-old man from Grays has been voluntarily interviewed and police enquiries are continuing.
I regret I can not now publish a copy of the letter that was circulated, even suitably redacted, norany further details to which I may become privy, however I understand a copy of this statement has now been circulated to other journalists and the story will most likely be published in various national papers and in the local Thurrock newspaper.
I will publish copies of any media material which comes to hand so keep watching Ukip-vs-EUkip
15:40hrs. 02=May-2016
end of Item of additional material
Additional material added 18:30hrs. 02-May-2016
Here is the police eMail with the recipient’s name etc. REDACTED.
From: REDACTED@essex.pnn.police.uk To: Subject: re: Your enquiry Date: Mon, 2 May 2016
Dear REDACTED
Statement below re: your earlier enquiry. No arrests have been made.
Norfolk Police were contacted on April 26 with a report of a sexual assault which took place in Essex. Essex Police are investigating this allegation and an allegation of malicious communications relating to letters being sent to a number of individuals. A 30-year-old man from Grays has been voluntarily interviewed and police enquiries are continuing.
ESSEX Police have launched an investigation into an alleged sex attack that is said to have taken place in the county.
An Essex Police spokesperson said: “Norfolk Police were contacted on April 26 with a report of a sexual assault which took place in Essex.
“Essex Police are investigating this allegation and an allegation of malicious communications relating to letters being sent to a number of individuals.
“A 30-year-old man from Grays has been voluntarily interviewed and police enquiries are continuing”.
end of Item of additional material
Additional material added 12:30hrs. 03-May-2016
Police investigate sexual assault allegation against Ukip MEP
Tim Aker, 30, voluntarily interviewed by officers over woman’s claims he sexually assaulted her at Ukip event in Essex last year
Tim Aker has been MEP for East of England since 2014 and was previously head of Ukip’s policy unit. Photograph: Gareth Fuller/PA
The Ukip MEP Tim Aker has been voluntarily interviewed by police in relation to an allegation of sexual assault made against him.
Aker, 30, has been MEP for East of England since 2014 and was previously head of Ukip’s policy unit. He is said to be close to Ukip’s leader, Nigel Farage.
The allegation has been made by a former Ukip activist. The sexual assault allegedly took place in September last year after a Ukip event in Essex.
It is understood that the woman, who is in her 20s, did not immediately report the alleged assault. In December she made a formal complaint to Ukip’s national executive committee (NEC).
On 26 April the woman contacted the police about the alleged assault and officers conducted a video interview with her.
A spokeswoman for Essex police said: “Police were contacted on 26 April with a report of a sexual assault which took place in Essex. Essex police are investigating this allegation. A 30-year-old man from Grays has been voluntarily interviewed and police enquiries are continuing.”
Steve Crowther, chairman of Ukip, said: “I can confirm that the party looked into allegations that were put to us; but it would be inappropriate for us to comment further on something which is subject to a police investigation, until that investigation is complete.”
In an unrelated inquiry, Essex police are investigating allegations of a “malicious communications” campaign targeting Aker, which has been circulated to dozens of politicians and members of the public.
The Essex police spokeswoman confirmed that an allegation of malicious communications relating to letters being sent to a number of individuals, was under investigation by police.
In his statement, Crowther said he was aware “the police are investigating an allegation of malicious communication targeting Tim Aker” and it would be inappropriate to comment further.
Essex Police investigating sexual assault claim against Ukip MEP Tim Aker
Essex Police investigating sexual assault claim against Euro MP
Stephanie Strong
POLICE are investigating a sexual assault claim against a south Essex Ukip MEP.
A former Ukip activist made the assault allegation against Tim Aker, which is said to have taken place in September last year in Essex.
Mr Aker, 30, has been MEP for East of England since 2014, and was previously head of Ukip’s policy unit.
An Essex Police spokesman said: “Norfolk Police were contacted on April 26 with a report of a sexual assault which took place in Essex.
“Essex Police are investigating this allegation and an allegation of malicious communication relating to letters sent to a number of individuals.
“A 30-year-old man from Grays has been voluntarily interviewed and police inquiries are continuing.”
Essex Police has also confirmed it has launched a separate investigation into a leaflet which was circulated at the end of last week, relating to Mr Aker.
A force spokesman said: “Essex Police is investigating an allegation of malicious communications relating to letters being sent to a number of individuals.
“Police were contacted on Thursday, April 28 with details of the incident.
“Enquiries are continuing. Anyone who receives a letter they believe to be malicious should report it to police on 101”.
Steve Crowther, chairman of UKIP, said: “I can confirm that the party looked into allegations that were put to us; but it would be inappropriate for us to comment further on something which is subject to a police investigation, until that investigation is complete.”
To view the original of this article CLICK HERE & HERE
end of Item of additional material
Additional material added 17:30hrs. 03-May-2016
UKIP MEP Tim Aker voluntarily speaks to police over allegations of sexual assault
Posted at 17:20
UKIP MEP and Thurrock councillor Tim Aker has voluntarily spoken to police over allegations of sexual assault.
BBC
Essex Police say they have “spoken to the person” reporting “an allegation and inquiries are continuing”.
Last week anonymous letters were sent round to Thurrock councillors and members of the public making claims against Tim Aker. Sources close to Mr Aker described these letters as making “outrageous claims”.
Essex Police have confirmed that they are also investigating “an allegation of malicious communications relating to letters being sent to a number ofindividuals”.
Steve Crowther, UKIP Chairman, said in a statement: “I can confirm that the party looked into allegations that were put to us; but it would be inappropriate for us to comment further on something which is subject to a police investigation, until that investigation is complete.”
#Ukip, Tim Aker, And The ‘Sexual Assault’ Story – Some Background …
[Caveat: I’m reporting here on what I’ve read in other media, and what I know. Anything else is reported as ‘allegations’, as the politician who is the subject of this article is innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. The problem is, the previous allegation was never investigated properly so, as it stands, it’ll never get to court, never get beyond rumour.Discussions have been ongoing in various forums about whether this information should be put in the Public Domain – not as reporting the current allegation, but as an allegation of a previous incident.
I believe it should. If this gets an allegation of a serious sexual crime actually investigated properly, it’s wholly justified.]
As a veteran campaigner against Racism, Fascism and in particular, Ukip, there’s a story I’ve been aware of for a while. A long while.
About a senior Ukip Official, allegations of a very serious sex crime, and a suspected Ukip cover-up.
Timothy Aker, Ukip MEP with questions to answer.
It’s a story I’ve heard from so many different sources that I’ve been convinced for a long time that it was completely true, but I could never get enough on it to interest the mainstream media.
I also had well-based concerns, along with others, for the welfare of the young female allegedly involved … and so I felt that the issue couldn’t be forced at the time.
Now, a story has broken, covered not just in local Essex newspapers here andhere but in The Guardian. I expect – and hope – that other media outlets will pick up the story and run it.
The Guardian story.
It’s based on the same sources as this detailed blog piece by Greg Lance-Watkins, here, which covers the case in depth, with Facebook posts of comments by the alleged victim.
Trigger warning for the above links – content may be upsetting.]
This is, I think, is in response both to the alleged victim filing a report about the incident, and also in reaction to a ‘malicious letter’ detailing these allegations, sent out to various organisations in the local Thurrock area.
Who sent the letter? I don’t know. (It wasn’t me, by the way).
What I can confirm is my suspicion over the reason why it was sent: Because despite a previous allegation against this person, no serious investigation into said allegation has ever been initiated. I’ve wondered about that. A lot. I suspect the letter was designed to force the issue. (That’s my theory…)
But here’s the thing: The story being reported by the media is actually not the story I, and others, had. It’s a different event, in a different place, involving adifferent female. There is here, quite clearly, a whole can of worms about to be opened.
I firmly believe the first alleged incident has not come to light due to a combination of [quote] “fear tactics and intimidation” [unquote] of the victim, but of course I can’t prove it. It’s only hearsay.
So – what will Ukip’s reaction be? I can take a good guess.
“It’s a well-timed smear campaign with no basis of truth …” Timing was merely due to the fact that the alleged victim took until 26th April to report it. Ukip will no doubt claim that her timing was suspicious but I’m pretty sure, as far as I know, no rival political party had any hand in this timing.
“The ‘Malicious Letter’ was issued by someone from [insert any Political Party here] …” Maybe it was. I don’t actually know. I suspect it was designed to force a police investigation into an allegation of a serious sexual crime – surely something Ukip would welcome? That fact doesn’t detract from the contents of the letter.
“The female involved is a [insert insult] with a history of [insert spurious unfounded allegation] …” I strongly expect this will happen. Ukip will go all guns blazing on the alleged victim with everything they have. The Ukip officials I suspect are on the case have been very quiet today. I think they’re busy, right now, on this. Character assassination is a weapon that Ukip have used before.
“It’s now a matter for the police so we can’t comment …” Well, it is now. But I note that Ukip have failed to take any action on this allegation during all the time we’re convinced they were fully aware of it.
For legal reasons, I can’t go into the details of the previous allegation as I understand that the victim herself in that alleged incident has not make a formal complaint. But what I can tell you is that the County Force in that incident – Lincolnshire Police – were made fully aware of the alleged incident (by a third party, known to me) last year.
They were also made aware of the girl’s age, as well as of other names within Ukip who were allegedly involved, not only in the alleged incident, but in the subsequent cover-up.
I trust now that Lincolnshire Police will properly investigate the previous allegation, and that several individuals (within Ukip) may choose now to either wait for the knock on the door – or reveal what they know.
While they can.
The real story here is much, much bigger: The suspected Ukip cover-up.
I have been advised on very good authority from several sources that certain officials within Ukip, senior to Tim Aker, were fully aware of the incident(s) and, at the very least, chose to take no action.
Lastly, don’t underestimate the seriousness of this matter. ‘Sexual Assault’ is a wide cover-all phrase which both the Police and the Media have to use at this time. This is not some mere allegation of ‘drunken groping’ or ‘wandering hands’ – as the alleged victim’s facebook post imply here[Trigger warning – victims words may be upsetting.]
I strongly believe that when further details of the story come to light, it will become clear that what is being alleged here – is rape.
Discussions have been ongoing in various forums about whether this information should be put in the Public Domain, not as reporting the current allegation, but as an allegation of a previous incident.
I believe it should. From what I have seen personally there is more than enough information on the original incident in Lincolnshire to justify an investigation – but none has taken place.
I expect flak. I expect threats. But I also expect Police to do their jobs and not dismiss these allegations as unfounded without investigating them thoroughly.
I have also been aware of the details John O’Connell has written of, but like him I was aware that there was insufficient evidence for me to present to the police – hence even now I am asking for any evidence that I can pass on to the police, minded that some who have information may be too scared of bullying by Ukip or damage to their own ambitions & well being to put their name to such evidence – maybe related to colleagues or friends!
I have been informed that others were aware to the extent of being involved, but lack hard evidence thereof.
However I would caution that Ukip internal enquiries are all too often just internal whitewash, designed to provide the answers which suit Ukip and Nigel Farage specifically – we need only consider the utterly dishonest outcomes of Ukip Kangarroo Courts such as that which were used to smear the names of Dr. David Abbott, Dr. Eric Edmond, Peter Baker, John West and others.
end of Item of additional material
Additional material added 10:30hrs. 13-May-2016
Police search home of Ukip MEP Tim Aker after sex assault claim
Interview: Tim Aker spoke to detectives Glenn Copus
The home of Ukip MEP Tim Aker has been searched by police investigating allegations of sexual assault, the Standard can reveal.
Officers searched the house in Grays, Essex, with Mr Aker’s consent, after a former Ukip activist contacted police alleging that the East of England MEP had attacked her.
Mr Aker, 30, who has been an MEP since 2014 and was previously head of Ukip’s policy unit, voluntarily attended a police interview over the claim. The alleged attack is said to have taken place last September after a Ukip event attended by party leader Nigel Farage.
The woman first complained to party chairman Steve Crowther in December and it is understood last month she decided to make a police report after being disappointed with the outcome of the Ukip national executive committee’s review of her complaint.
Officers conducted a video interview with her on April 26 and three days later searched Mr Aker’s home in his presence. Essex police are also investigating an allegation of malicious communications after the alleged victim reported that letters about her and Mr Aker had been sent anonymously to politicians and members of the public. Mr Aker is also understood to have complained to police about the letters.
An Essex police spokeswoman said: “Norfolk police were contacted on April 26 with a report of a sexual assault which took place in Essex… Police inquiries are continuing.”
A spokesman for Ukip said Mr Aker denied the sexual assault allegation against him.
For additional facts including details of other victims
if/when they become legally publishable CLICK HERE
Hi,
it is astonishing how lax the media are when it comes to sexual assault of women by those in some form of elected authority.
Yet in otherr instances they are all over the alleged miscreant like a cheap suit!
You may well have noted that when the notoriously dishonest and corrupt thief Annabelle Fuller having been caught leaving an MP’s flat having stolen his Blackberry phone, some cofidential letters and his House of Commons pass, and having admitted to her criminality after a day drinking and having, according to an MEP who was present in the pub, targeted the MP specifically she made false accusations that the MP had tried to ‘fondle’ her – this story by Annabelle Fuller, who has now changed her name to avoid identification with her past, was plastered all over the national media.
The publicity given of the true victim in that case, who was Andrew Bridgen, contributed to his being divorced and estranged from his own children – yet in the case of the Ukip MEP Tim Aker – also a fairly obscure politician the matter seems to have been hushed up or at best ignored by the media!
Why was Andrew Bridgen pilloried by the media based on a false allegation made by an untrustworthy thief yet when one of the young Ukip volunteers reports an actual rape and an anal rape at that near silence!
It makes one wonder what other crimes are being hushed up in the light of the various allegations being talked of regarding Tim Aker and was his so called foundation a charity with more similarity to those of Jimmy Saville than any legitimate charity!
end of Item of additional material
.
From:REDACTED <REDACTED@googlemail.com> Date: 29 April 2016 13:55:04 BST To:REDACTED Subject:Mary
Hi REDACTED
see attached.
REDACTED
You will note the material below is a series of screen captures from Facebook from amongst those which I have!
Keep checking back on this page as there is much more to come which I have read and checked and hold copies of – including the full signed statement supplied to the police, including an allegation of anal rape + copies of eMails from senior Ukip leadership desperately trying to achieve a cover-up.
containing this extract, which I have always understood to be an allegation of RAPE:
” …. so I gave in to his wanting to have sex, partly out of fear he would be violent again if I refused. During sex he suddenly initiated anal sex without my consent. I told him to stop repeatedly and tried to push him off me, but he held me by my wrists and I could not move my legs due to his weight. The more I struggled the more he seemed to be enjoying himself, so I just gave up and waited until it was over, still begging him to stop and telling him he was hurting me. Once he had finished, he just got up and went to the bathroom. When he returned, he went straight to sleep next to me. I was shocked and traumatised and didn’t know what to do. I barely slept at all that night”.
Clearly it is the duty of the leadership of Ukip to uphold the law not to suppress the truth for their own gain! They should clearly have supported the young woman and encouraged her to report such a serious and violent crime as rape!
I also will supply the names of the Police involved and their names and numbers – also details of a breech of para 106 of the representation of the people act – an attempt by a political rival to gain advantage over a Ukip candidate seeking election who already holds an elected office by publishing the name of his alleged rape victim without the victim’s consent, also using a picture of her without her express permision!
I understand the details have been sent relatively widely) by 2nd class Royal Mail and also distributed by other means, but although I am informed it was distributed for electoral gain I can not as yet verify this by providing a copy of the leaflet, though I know for certain the media are aware of the publication.
The details are already in the hands of responsible foreign media who intend to publish the full story, at their convenience.
I am informed by the media that Ukip’s offices in Grays, strangely in the run up to an election, have been closed for the last few days – possibly since they suspected I had all of this material and an official complaint had been made to the police!
I will also publish the official crime report number when the time is apposite!
Do check back on a regular basis as the entire sad sick story is revealed – both here and in the media!
.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.