This blog was talking of Farage’s relationship back in 2014 & his interest in ‘having a ride in a Ferrari …’ see: CLICK HERE
We have also identified other houses he has seemingly purchased in a clandestine manner either through proxy or in the name of ‘Thorn In The Side’. Some believe he has used Russian money for certain property purchases such as a property in Tuscany and another near Saint Tropez!
Read on:
Nigel Farage’s wife of 18 years moves out of the family home eight months after it was revealed he was living with his French politician girlfriend
Ex-Ukip leader, 54, has taken out new mortgage on his £600,000 Kent house to buy £575,000 property for second wife Kirsten nearby
Mail on Sunday revealed Mr Farage was living with politician Laure Ferrari, 38
Ms Ferrari met Mr Farage a decade ago as a waitress in Strasbourg
Published: 23:49, 14 October 2017 | Updated: 00:17, 15 October 2017
Nigel Farage’s wife of 18 years has moved out of the family home – eight months after The Mail on Sunday revealed he was living with French politician Laure Ferrari.
The former Ukip leader has taken out a new mortgage on his £600,000 Kent house – at the age of 54 – to buy a £575,000 property for second wife Kirsten nearby.
Friends say it is a sign that he is ‘getting serious’ with Ms Ferrari, 38, who met Mr Farage a decade ago as a waitress in Strasbourg.
Former Ukip leader Nigel Farage has taken out a new mortgage on his £600,000 Kent house – at the age of 54 – to buy a £575,000 property for second wife Kirsten (right) nearby
Nigel Farage’s wife of 18 years has moved out of the family home – eight months after The Mail on Sunday revealed he was living with French politician Laure Ferrari (pictured with Mr Farage mid-August)
She now runs the Eurosceptic think-tank the Institute for Direct Democracy in Europe, which has financial links with Ukip.
When this newspaper revealed in February that Mr Farage was sharing a secret £4 million Chelsea bachelor pad with Ms Ferrari, he said it was ‘crackers’ to suggest an affair.
Friends say it is a sign that he is ‘getting serious’ with Ms Ferrari, 38, who met Mr Farage a decade ago as a waitress in Strasbourg
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
The regional broadcaster has suggested the Elvis Presley tribute act, A Vision of Elvis, has sold more tickets than the erstwhile Ukip frontman for their respective shows at the Prince’s Theatre in Clacton, Essex.
As the Ukip MEP Godfrey Bloom pointed out, the problem might stem from the Farage show being £25 per head for an ‘An Evening with Nigel Farage’.
“I’m surprised anybody at all is prepared to pay £25 to listen to any politician,” Bloom told the broadcaster.
“I still do lots of after-dinner speaking and stuff, but if people are going to cough up 25, 30 or 40 quid they expect a three course meal to go with it.”
According to BBC Essex, Farage is expecting to sell hundreds more tickets before the show, and the burst of publicity may well tip the balance against ‘A Vision of Elvis’.
Well lets look at what seems to be FAKE NEWS courtesy of #Liberty Nation’
I’ve commented in black in text below:
Nigel Farage to Speak in DC
LibertyNation.com brings BREXIT Leader
Firstly Farage is not nor has he ever been so called ‘BreXit Leader’ – he was refused any part of the official Leave Campaign as it was widely believed he was damaging to the cause!
Let us remember he colluded with the criminal John Ison who was involved with Farage & carried out a series of thefts & editing of material to provide false evidence to try to have Nikki Sinclaire, who if anyone can be called the ‘Leader of BreXit’ it is she!
Nikki Sinclaire set out single handedly and using her own money to build a team who obtained a valid petition of 200,000+ signatures from members of the electorate that when presented at Downing Street forced the Government’s hand to hold a full debate of the issue of Leaving_The_EU which led to the largest revolt Cameron as PM had had in Parliament and the undertaking that an IN/OUT Referendum would be held.
You will be pleased to cnow the Police prosecution which Farage had colluded in with the criminal John Ison was shown to be a pack of lies which it does seem the Police & CPS colluded in either utterly corruptly for the Government of the day or as a result of complete incompetence it is hard to say – though there are many ‘coincidences’ which I find would indicate the former rather than the latter!
Not least of which is the failure of the police to prosecute John Ison and even possibly Farage based on the crimes John Ison admitted to in Court, further the Police have on various items outright lied to Nikki Sinclaire & her legal team, in efforts to cover their tracks and also the fact that neither the Police nor the CPS have either appologised nor have they offered any compensation for the damage done to Nikki Sinclaire nor for the destruction of her career!
Farage clearly was no ‘BreXit Leader’ in fact he did a great deal to try to prevent the public vote for BreXit besides his divisive nature!
to Washington to Speak on Trump Presidency and Populist Revolution
The so-called Donald Trump of Britain, Nigel Farage, is set to speak on Thursday, October 12 at 8 PM at the Georgetown Marriott located at 1221 22nd St NW, Washington, DC.
Pray tell: By who is Farage known as ‘The Donald Trump of Britain’ beyond his shaving mirror & his own publicity?
As leader of the UK Independence Party
Farage is no longer Leader of the UK Independence Part – he stood down a year ago & due to his failure as a leader & lack of leadership skill the ‘Cult’ he had built has all but collapsed and is already on its 6th leader since he quit! A mere 12,000 members could even be bothered to vote in the last election, which many claim was, like so many other Ukip internal elections, rigged; as the clear front runner was an extreme Islamaphobe & seen by much of the media as an outspoken racist!
and longtime member of Parliament,
Farage has stood & campaigned 8 times to be a Member of Parliament and has never been elected to the British Parliament. He has however placed himself as top of the list in the safest Ukip region & become one of several members of the largely irrelevant EU Parliament based on a list vote!
Farage stoked the Trump-like populist revolt which resulted in the dramatic, game-changing withdrawal of Britain from the European Union.
It is true that like Trump Farage did much to scrape the bottom of the barrel and play on fear & what was widely seen as overt racism to mobilise support for his ‘cult’ – in much the same way as has Macron in France, the AfD in Germany, Corbyn in the UK Labour party, Le Penn in France’s National Party and others seeking personal power and glory at any cost – argueably in a style not too dissimilar to Cuba and Chavez in Venezuela!
The Brexit uprising against the established order has already changed the face of Britain, the EU, and the US.
Schedule of events: 7 PM open bar reception – West End Lounge
8 PM Nigel Farage Speaks followed by open Q & A – Metropolitan Galleries 1-2
9 PM Dessert, coffee and photo ops/interviews with Mr. Farage – West End Lounge
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
I gather this is just a part of the financial chaos Ukip is in with a number of its people claiming not to have been paid since June as the EU is demanding back money that was perloined from the tax payers, even Annabelle Fuller is bleating on Twitter, whether in her own name or one of her various aliases I didn’t bother checking as Ukip is becoming more of an irrelevance daily.
Ukip’s only allegedly consequential backer Arron Banks is reported in the media as lacking in income with sources drying up, it seems and Farage’s contacts who funded him seem to have left him dependent on his ureliable income as an entertainer on LBC.
Although I will post details of consequence regarding Ukip they have become something of an irrelevance, hence the slowdown of postings. It does rather look as if it is likely that having lost so many sources of income an article shortly may well announce that Ukip is in that legally parlous state of trading when knowingly bankrupt!
United Kingdom Independence Party Ukip loses access to multimillion EU funding scheme
Failure of anti- Brussels group to register follows series of scandals
Nigel Farage, Ukip MEP and former leader, has been hit by the failure to secure EU funds
by Michael Acton in Brussels
The UK Independence party and its anti-EU allies in Brussels have lost access to their biggest source of European campaign funding following a series of scandals over alleged misuse and misappropriation of funds.
After becoming insolvent in April, the Ukip-dominated pan-European Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe (ADDE) has now missed a deadline to register for EU funding, losing access to as much as €1.5m in 2018 alone, according to officials involved in the process.
The apparent demise of the ADDE and the loss of the funding will add to Ukip’s woes and will be a headache for the party’s new leader, Henry Bolton, its fourth in a year.
Ukip is wrestling with a weaker financial position at home as well as demands from Brussels for the ADDE to repay €172,655 allegedly misspent on national electioneering. U
kip and its European allies have denied any wrongdoing. European political parties, made up of coalitions of national parties and parliamentarians, have since 2004 been able to draw on an annual €30m pot of EU grants that can cover up to 85 per cent of party expenditure, including campaign costs for European elections.
This helped bankroll Ukip electioneering, and in past years the ADDE has used this route to receive more than €1m annually.
Roger Helmer, a former Ukip MEP, described drawing on the fund as “liberating” money from the EU. But since November, the ADDE has been embroiled in probes over how its EU support was used.
A European Parliament-appointed auditor found that almost €500,000 was inappropriately spent on national opinion polling and election campaigns in the UK and Belgium. The parliament demanded the ADDE repay €172,655. The auditor also found that almost €34,000 of funding had been wrongly claimed by the Initiative for Direct Democracy in Europe (IDDE), the ADDE’s political foundation. The ADDE has denied any wrongdoing.
The IDDE no longer has an obvious online presence and couldn’t be reached for comment.
Tighter funding rules are squeezing the support available to fringe parties in Europe.
Last year the European Parliament imposed conditions requiring applicants to have guarantees from a bank with an A1 credit rating, something the ADDE has been unable to secure. In March of this year, the party’s executive director Yasmine Dehaene resigned.
Other ADDE members include the Belgian People’s party, the Czech Party of Free Citizens, France’s Debout la France, Lithuania’s Order and Justice party, and the Swedish Democrats. All members will be cut off from EU funds.
Mischael Modrikamen, head of the Belgian People’s party, said the ADDE’s decline was a result of a politically motivated campaign against Eurosceptic groups. “There is a trend in the EU right now with a clear aim to defund all the parties that are opposed to the European project,” he said. “Since most of the ADDE’s funding comes from the EU budget, we were forced to put an end to activities. We decided we had no other choice than to appoint a liquidator.”
He said that some of the ADDE’s member parties may attempt to form a new party next year to regain access to funds. Eleven European political parties have successfully registered for the 2018 funding year, down from 16 in 2017.
It suggests the series of changes during the past three years have halted the proliferation of parties eligible for EU funding over the past decade, and have even started to reverse the trend.
The continuing controversy around party funding has highlighted wider questions about whether a top-down EU attempt to support and fund pan-European politics is realistic or desirable.
Pieter Cleppe, head of the Brussels office of think-tank Open Europe, said the rules were “opaque” and invited abuse. “Not only do people set up obscure schemes to obtain funds, it also enables the European Parliament to pick and choose who to go after, based on ideological preferences,” he said.
To view the original article eMailed to me CLICK HERE
Then a few days later & playing catch-up:
Poor Nigel Farage, what will he do without all those euros?
I wouldn’t say that Ukip’s approach to funding was slipshod….
Nigel, this is no laughing matter. Photograph: Sebastien Bozon/AFP/Getty Images
Please brace yourself for the tragic news that Ukip has lost access to a major source of European Union campaign funding. Astonishingly, it involves a scandal over Ukip’s “misuse of money” and an element of Ukip incompetence.
It seems that the Ukip-dominated Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe (ADDE) became insolvent in April, after the EU parliament demanded that some funding be repaid after £500,000 was wrongly spent on EU referendum polling. ADDE has since missed the deadline to register for EU funding next year because it forgot to fill in the forms. Come on, we’ve all done it: it’s very easy to overlook such trifles as applying for funds that could total £1.5m.
Ukip still has access to loads-a-euros via Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy, of which Nigel Farage just happens, by sheer, crazy coincidence, to be president. However, does this adequately compensate for the human rights disaster of an anti-EU organisation not receiving EU funding because it was too thick and disorganised to apply on time? My fellow countrymen and women: who will march with me about this – and where’s Crowdfunder when you need it?
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
Ukip fighting like ferrets in a sack as usual, showing the divisions with Andy Wigmore as Arron Banks(rupt’s) puppet! Clearly Amateur Hour Amongst #Ukip Mouth Pieces As #Louise_Mensch Uses FACTS to blow them out of the water, yet again, on Twitter:
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
Ukip has published its sad list of leadership candidates for its election next month after the loss of their Messiah:
he was no leader but was indubitably a competent, if self serving, self indulgent and self enriching rabble rouser and undeniably he raised the rabble!
After fronting Ukip with #BreXit achieved despite the utter ineptitude and divisive nature of Farage and his bankrololer Aaron Banks who is increasingly seen to be little more than a self publicist with access to money – something of a frontman for larger influences!
You will have noticed the links that I have published and apparent influence of Russia and Russian money which is coming to light …
Those who have been listed so far as candidates are:
David Allen
Henry Bolton
David Coburn
Jane Collins
David Kurten
Marion Mason
Aidan Powlesland
John Rees-Evans
Ben Walker
Anne Marie Waters
Peter Whittle
A list all too easily perceived to be made up of nobodys, nebishes, nere do wells, chancers and clearly the irrelevant when considering their political reputations and achievements – there would seem to be no one of merit, notable competence or leadership skills but do note Ukip admits it has not performed due dilligence & vetting – howmany and who that will leave is to be announced after Ukip NEC meeting on the 11-Aug.
There may well be none left.
Even at a glance the list shows a sad potential choice with no notable choice to make!
It looks all too likely Ukip’s decline will continue & if forced to repay the funding it would seem to have perloined that decline could overnight become a collapse!
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
“My gut feeling is that we’re going to get the Brexit that we fought for, and like your favourite old banger that you drove around and had wonderful picnics in and went to the seaside, it got you to where you wanted to go. But the day comes when you have to say goodbye to it and replace it, with a better model.”
Nathan Gill is not talking about a car, but about his own party.
As the party embarks on its third leadership contest in a year, UKIP’s MEP in Wales thinks that, unless the party can find a big issue to corral around like the Brexit negotiations, it could be curtains for its future.
Paul Nuttall, the party’s last leader, resigned after a dire general election performance which saw the party win no seats and, in Wales, saw UKIP lose all of its deposits in the 32 seats it contested.
Its share of the vote plunged too, from 13.6% in the 2015 general election to just 2%.
It didn’t always look like it was going to be this way.
Image caption Nathan Gill suggests that a UKIP without a cause to rally around may be like an “old banger”
Back in May 2016 UKIP formed a group in the assembly with seven AMs sitting in the Senedd.
The assumption held by many was that their assembly presence would serve as a springboard for the party to continue to build its presence in Wales.
So far, that has not happened.
Since the Senedd election two of their most high-profile members – Mr Gill and Mark Reckless – have gone independent, dwindling their assembly numbers to five.
UKIP also failed to take off at the Welsh council elections a month before the general election result, failing to win any seats.
David Rowlands, the UKIP AM for South Wales East and a long-standing member of the party, argues that the poor performance in June was not down to UKIP but the fact that the poll was like a “presidential” election.
“The reason that it looks so bad for ourselves is that we’ve hit such heights over the last few general elections,” he says.
But there had been internal disagreement over the party’s general election campaign, which focused on banning the burka as a key policy.
The issue fed into the question around what UKIP’s purpose is now, with its core policy – Brexit – being implemented by the UK government.
Mr Gill, who remains a UKIP MEP despite being an independent AM after falling out with Senedd group leader Neil Hamilton, says the reality was that there “was the one issue that united us, and that was leaving the EU”.
“The only way really that UKIP can continue, I think, is if we have that big picture, that big goal of what we need to achieve,” he says.
The MEP claims a “half-baked” Brexit could “reignite UKIP”.
Image caption David Rowlands denied there was an existential threat to the party
The new model Mr Gill refers to in his old banger analogy “may be a political movement, it may be a new party”.
It is important to remember that Mr Gill has had his own difficulties with UKIP in the last 12 months – having been threatened with expulsion by the ruling National Executive Committee over being both MEP and AM.
Meanwhile Mr Rowlands denies there is an existential threat to UKIP and says the party represents something others do not.
“What people don’t understand is, if someone should leave the UK Independence Party at the moment, which party would they go to to reflect their views?
“I’m dyed in the wool UKIP, but could I go somewhere else and feel comfortable that they care about this country in the way I care about the United Kingdom?”
He admits that some members have thought the job was done after the referendum.
“There was a feeling out there, and it was among a number of members of UKIP, that we’ve done the job that we came into being to do, we’ve got ourselves Brexit… therefore what is now the raison d’etre of the party?”
Mr Rowlands, however, says “large numbers” of members who felt that way are returning to UKIP because they fear the Brexit negotiations do not reflect what the British people voted for.
Unlike Mr Gill, Mr Rowlands said he had been comfortable with the burka ban policy.
“I think the burka is an appalling garment… to me its a symbol of oppression of women”, he says.
Image caption Anne Marie Waters is one of the 11 hoping to be candidates for leadership of the party
There are now 11 hopefuls who have registered an interest in taking over the party. They face a vetting process that is currently pegged to end this Friday, with voting due in September.
One of people thought to be a frontrunner is Anne Marie Waters – who has been vocal in her opposition to Islam.
There is talk of UKIP MEPs resigning if she won.
Mr Gill has been reluctant to say very much about the leadership campaign – he is not publicly backing a candidate.
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
Leave campaign funder Arron Banks to testify on ‘Russia ties’ to Brexit and Donald Trump
Caroline Wheeler, Deputy Political Editor July 30 2017, 12:01am,
The prominent “leave” campaigner and millionaire businessman Arron Banks expects to be called to Washington to give evidence before the Senate into alleged ties between the Kremlin, Brexit and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
The business tycoon has already been asked to supply information to the Senate judiciary committee investigating alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential contest.
Now he claims he has been “tipped off” by the US authorities that he will be called to give evidence to the committee under threat of subpoena, which means he could be barred from America if he fails to attend.
Earlier this year the former Ukip donor had threatened to sue Atlantic Council, a Washington-based think tank, over claims that he is a “pro-Russian actor”.
The businessman, who helped to bankroll the Brexit campaign, issued a press release saying he was taking legal proceedings against Atlantic Council over its report entitled The Kremlin’s Trojan Horses. It mentions Banks’s name under the heading of “pro-Russian actors” along with figures such as the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Ukip’s former leader Nigel Farage.
Last month Farage had to dismiss claims that he is a “person of interest” in the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign for the presidency and its suspected collusion with Russia.
Well may the US authorities puzzle as to whence came the leak that permitted Banks to have the story written legaled and published last Saturday when the American authorities made no formal request until Tuesday, but I guess we are all getting used to the incompetent and unreliable nature of the Trump government and its revolving door policy of employing family and friends.
Arron Banks’ chum Nigel Farage mounted a defence of Banks as he himself had not been suboenaded to be cross examined, butFarage overlooks the fact that may have given a reprieve being still an MEP and thereby having a % of diplomatic immunity.
It is of course worthy of note that Farage may well be a usable asset from the viewpoint of the FBI, CIA & NSA, it is probable they have enough facts about Farage’s activities from the plea bargaining of George Cottrell see CLICK HERE thus they can afford to reel Farage in when it suits him, in the interim they can follow up on everone who contacts him and those he contacts.
Whilst musing on just how embroiled Farage may or may not be with Russian dirty money consider:
I well recall the words of Mandy Rice-Davies in a rather more notorious Russian spy saga in politics ‘Well he would say that wouldn’t he’.
You may wish to consider more details of Arron Banks & his questionable financing CLICK HERE
Thus the saga of Ukip, BreXit and financing seems to get more convoluted by the minute. One is left to ponder whether once Banks has testified before the US authorities whether they may procede against him having rather more knowledge of his financing and accounts and the sources of his income from the transactions at his banks both in his name and numbered, in Britain and abroad!
Regards, Greg_L-W.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
You will find me on both Skype & Twitter but I do not utilise the attrociously regulated FaceBook nor similar social media.
Skype: GregL-W
TWITTER: @Greg_LW
You are encouraged to contact me with information or to effect a correction on any of my postings – BUT I only respond to individuals providing a verifiable name, address and land line telephone.
NB:
I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
I DO NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
I DO NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
I DO NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
I REGRET due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
I AM NOT a WARMIST
I DO NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR, Thorium & Psi/Si technologies
I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
I DO NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
I VALUE the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
I DO NOT trust or believe in armed police
I DO NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence
I BELIEVE in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
I DO TRY to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all consequential corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
minded that Hugh Moelwyn Hughes is not only a founder member of Ukip but also a solicitor, very much in touch with both Ukip and the laws under which it has been bound for the last 24 years, I find his letter most interesting.
May I draw your attention to his statement:
In July 2019 we will lose our MEPs, their salaries, their allowances for staff and offices, and access to the funds of ADDE and IDDE. The few remaining paid staff will have to work Stakhanovite hours if they are to keep up with requirements, and in busy campaign periods will cause bottlenecks and delays entirely because they are required to do more than is humanly possible.
The major loss of paid staff means that we must rely on volunteers
to carry out the necessary work and to fund our General Election Campaign.
This is a quite astonishing statement from so senior a member of the party, a founder and chairman/defacto of Ukip in Wales.
This is an outright admission in written form that Ukip has been apparently stealing tax payers’ money via the EU to fund its domestic political activities, staff, offices and elections and will from ‘July 2019’ no longer be able to tap into this unlawful source of money and will no longer be able to fund itself with money obtained illicitly from taxpayers via the EU.
Hugh makes it very clear that Ukip have been dependent on
‘…MEPs, their salaries, their allowances for staff and offices, and access to the funds of ADDE and IDDE.’
This is totally contra the rules of the EU and is a fraudulent use of tax payers’ money.
Let it be noted that Jeffrey Titford, Nigel Farage, Graham Booth, Derek Clarke, Tom Wise and little doubt there have been others have been found guilty of this offence and have had to pay back substantial sums – currently Nigel Farage is under order to repay a further £80,000.
Now we have a published open letter of admission that the entire party has been dependent on monies stolen from the tax payers via the EU.
So just how many £Millions have Ukip purloined since it had its first 3 MEPs Michael Holmes, Jeffrey Titford & Nigel Farage elected almost 20 years ago and will they & successors be liable for repayment, or like Tom Wise face a custodial sentence for their crimes.
Minded that Diane James was elected leader of Ukip and she and her partner were of some substance, might her rapid resignation have been prompted by the realisation by her partner, who was a competent & well heeled businessman, that their assets could well be attached to cover Ukip debts!
Consider the potentially catastrophic implications for senior members of Ukip past and present and for the party itself!
An open letter to all candidates for the leadership of UKIP
An open letter to all candidates for the leadership of UKIP:
SOLVING UKIP’S EXECUTIVE PROBLEM
In July 2019 we will lose our MEPs, their salaries, their allowances for staff and offices, and access to the funds of ADDE and IDDE. The few remaining paid staff will have to work Stakhanovite hours if they are to keep up with requirements, and in busy campaign periods will cause bottlenecks and delays entirely because they are required to do more than is humanly possible.
The major loss of paid staff means that we must rely on volunteers
to carry out the necessary work and to fund our General Election Campaign.
In order to attract the maximum number of volunteers to execute the policies decided by the Leader and Governing Body executive activity will have to be devolved to local manageable areas, in which members can drive to a central meeting place within one hour ie. the Counties in England, and sub-regions in Wales, Scotland and London. (Adjustments may be required in the vast sub-regions of the Highlands and Mid & West Wales)
Currently County Branches consist of Chairmen only.
In his satirical depiction of Communism George Orwell described what happened: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”, and so the pigs who were greedy for power reduced the other animals to an inferior status, and worked the faithful carthorse to death.
The Orwellian model has no place in a democratic party.
It is insulting to the members who are excluded, and by excluding talent is damaging to the Party.
The Chairman-only model is wholly inadequate to carry out the necessary executive tasks now envisaged.
Dr Alan Sked our first Leader placed this Party in the centre of the classical liberal tradition and in opposition to the top down governance of the pigs in the EU, which was destroying democracy. That was the point of the Party !
Democratic County Branches made up of all of UKIP members’ talents will be able to receive requests from the Leader and Governing Body and to action on them locally.
The County Branches will need the usual complement of Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer plus probably a membership secretary, minute secretary, press officer, fundraiser and every other functionary they can think of, to break the work down into manageable units.
County Branches will be responsible for ensuring that those Constituency Associations which are fully operational should never be interfered with, but that Constituencies which are less well developed are helped in every way.
The County Branch will provide a forum for all members in its constituencies to meet each other, to hear visiting speakers, to overcome the enemy of isolation, and to develop camaraderie, so as to be prepared for campaigning.
All UKIP members within the County will be members of the County Branch.
The constitution for a County Branch will be the same as for a Constituency Association.
Democratic County Branches will be an attractive focus for donations
We had more than 400 Patrons 2 to 3 years ago. Over 200 Patrons have left us!
Patrons need to know where their money is going, and have lost confidence in a party which does not tell them where their money went.
Patrons will give generously to a focussed campaign which is run with financial integrity.
County Branches producing proper accounts will attract donations.
UKIP is a pressure party. Our pressure forced Cameron to call a Referendum, which we won.
Now our task is to overcome backsliding Tories, impractical Corbynistas and treacherous Blairites to secure our exit from the EU and to provide voters with a free trade, free enterprise party with private sector solutions to social problems like housing, and principled opposition to the Marxist programmes which have so beguiled the younger generation.
Democratic County branches can co-ordinate local campaigns, and re-build the Party, based on the policies already identified by the Institute for Economic Affairs, the Taxpayers’ Alliance, the Freedom Association, and our very own Professor Tim Congdon and Gerard Batten MEP.
After July 2019 when the MEP model of funding collapses we will have the nightmare of managing the major requirements of the next General Election with even fewer paid staff.
The inadequacy of HQ staff at the recent General Election is going to get worse.
The Democratic County solution is essential to provide the Executive Deficit.
No other solution has been proposed !!!!!!
UKIP will fail in the next General Election if we do not adopt the Democratic County model.
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
here is the entirely self serving statement of Ukip’s MEP Patrick O’Flynn as he resigns from his position as Ukip’s ‘economic and media & sport spokesman’.
This would seem to now mean that only a minority of those elected as Ukip’s MEPs would seem to remain unsullied as Ukip members, in as far as you can call anyone who has represented Ukip as unsullied! O’Flynn would seem to have joined the majority of Ukip MEPs and quit his allocated role!
There is no one of note or apparent stature and ability left in Ukip and one may ask if they are all leaving the sinking ship to try to distance themselves from the various enquiries andf debts of Ukip and the huge sums they are being demanded to repay having falsely claimed them from the public purse, as with the recent summ of £80K being claimed of Nigel Farage!
The informed will well recall that Patrick O’Flynn is well versed in the art of self serving actions and reporting , you will recall to obtain his position as an MEP it would seem all too clear that he prostituted his entire career as a journalist – selling out as a journalist, in as far as one can attribute the title to a staff member of a rag like The Express!
Throughout the run up to his appointment as an MEP by Nigel Farage it would seem O’Flynn published promotional matyerial for Ukip, in The Express, lacking the integrity to disclose his ambition and the partisan nature of the stories he wrote for his employer.
O’Flynn is indubitably a man who can be held in little but contempt as a journalist and of dubious ethics as an MEP even by Ukip standards!
O’Flynn was it seems rewarded not only with his salary as a so called Journalist, when it is apparent he had prostituted the job of journalism to being little more than acting as an advertising copywriter fo Nigel Farage in return for appointment to the number one position in the Regional list for Ukip – despite having been an undeclared member of the party.
Clearly O’Flynn is not a man of ethics or integrity and well you may ask what is his aim in this, the latest self serving declaration:
Patrick O’Flynn MEP to relinquish posts as UKIP economic and media & sport spokesman.
27th Jul, 17
Patrick O’Flynn MEP to relinquish posts as UKIP economic and media & sport spokesman.
East of England MEP Patrick O’Flynn today announces he is giving up his roles as an official UKIP party spokesman.
Mr O’Flynn will give up his roles as economic spokesman and media & sport spokesman with immediate effect.
He said: “It is clear to me that UKIP’s activist base wishes to go in a more libertarian, shrink-the-state and Thatcherite direction when it comes to economic policy.
“Ever since becoming prominent in the party, I have argued for UKIP to be at the common sense centre of politics, rather than allowing itself to be defined as on the right wing. For example, I have sought support for tough measures to combat corporate tax avoidance and proposed a premium rate of VAT for luxury goods in order to make that tax more equitable. I have also championed more resources for the NHS, arguing against those in the party who would prefer to run healthcare on private insurance lines.
“Recently I set out in a blog why I did not think a libertarian and Thatcherite economic approach of further shrinking the state or giving more tax cuts for the rich via a “flat tax” was a good idea. But every leadership candidate I have heard appears to disagree with me about our economic approach. So rather than hanging around to obstruct a new leader, I have decided to make way now.
“I will concentrate instead on campaigning for the best possible Brexit during my remaining time as an MEP. This is one theme on which the party is entirely united around the six Brexit tests that were set out under Paul Nuttall’s leadership. So I will be glad to be campaigning entirely with the grain of the party.
“I do feel it is a regrettable that the more centrist approach argued for by the likes of me and Suzanne Evans is falling by the wayside in UKIP. But I also acknowledge that shrink-the-state libertarianism is more deeply embedded within the DNA of the party than I had appreciated.
“Libertarianism is an important strand of political thought and while I have always borne that standpoint in mind during policy formulation, I have never felt defined by it and have generally argued for the important and legitimate role of a strong state in promoting a good society to be equally kept in mind.
“I do not however dispute that Libertarians, Classical Liberals and other small state advocates deserve a political party to make their arguments to the British public and clearly there is an appetite within UKIP to set out that stall in the months ahead.
“I will always be proud of UKIP’s essential role in forcing the EU referendum and delivering victory in June of last year. And it will be an enormous privilege to help see the Brexit mission, upon which I have worked for so long, through to completion in 2019.”
The present leadership election was triggered after Paul Nuttall quit when the party’s support collapse in June’s general election, largely due to his inept, incompetent and corrupt leadership.
Candidates who have declared they will be standing include John Rees-Evans who last year drew criticism after he claimed a homosexual donkey raped his horse, and Mike Hookem who allegedly punched fellow MEP Steven Woolfe.
It is the second time Mr O’Flynn has stood down from his role as Ukip’s economic spokesman!
He first resigned following the 2015 general election, claiming Nigel Farage had become “snarling, thin-skinned and aggressive” because he was surrounded with a “poisonous” inner circle. This of course was fundamentally true but would also seem to have been motivated by his own personal ambitions!
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
A North Wales AM has called Chuka Umunna a “f***ing coconut” during a foul-mouthed rant against him, Barack Obama and Tristram Hunt.
Michelle Brown, a regional Ukip AM, said the Labour MP for Streatham was “black on the outside, white on the inside” in a telephone conversation with Nigel Williams, who was her senior advisor at the time.
In the exchange on May 14, 2016, Ms Brown also described former Labour MP Mr Hunt as a “t**t” and derided his background, before saying former US President Obama was “exactly the same” as Mr Umunna.
Ms Brown has apologised to anyone offended by her comments and said the language she used about Mr Umunna was “inappropriate”.
During the conversation last year, the AM said: “I don’t say this lightly…but Chuka Umunna is a f***ing coconut.
“He’s got as much understanding of an ordinary black man’s experience as I have.
“He may be black but his mother or his father was British from a very, very influential family.
“He is a coconut – black on the outside, white on the inside, and Barack Obama’s exactly the same.”
A spokesperson for the National Assembly for Wales Labour group said: “This is absolutely outrageous language and lays bare the disgusting racism at the heart of UKIP.
“Anything less than immediate suspension would be a clear endorsement of Michelle Brown’s racist slur.”
Chuka Umunna MP(Image: Anthony Devlin/PA Wire)
Mr Williams worked for Ms Brown for just over a year before being sacked by her in May this year, and was previously a police detective of 14 years in North Wales and Merseyside.
He said he spoke out after recently discovering the conversation among his records.
“I was absolutely appalled,” said Mr Williams.
“It’s bad enough coming from anybody, but to come from a newly appointed Assembly Member is absolutely appalling.
“I’ve seen swearing and I’ve been called all sorts of names myself, but I’ve actually never seen it from somebody in such a position.
“This wasn’t a meltdown. This was just a conversation that Michelle Brown was having, which she thought was OK.
Former Labour MP Tristram Hunt(Image: Yui Mok/PA Wire)
“There was no meltdown going on. She was talking ordinarily about something else and just decided to throw that into the conversation.
“She was being appallingly badly behaved.”
In a statement, Ms Brown said: “The point I was making is that, because of his considerable wealth and privilege, Chukka Umunna cannot possibly understand the difficulties and issues that the average black person faces in this country any more than I can, and I stand by that assertion.
“I do however accept that the language I used in the private conversation was inappropriate and I apologise to anyone that has been offended by it.
“As far as the language I used about Mr Hunt is concerned, it was a private conversation and I was using language that friends and colleagues often do when chatting to each other.”
Mr Ummuna, Mr Hunt and UKIP have been approached for comment.
I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual