Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
#0238* – UKIP found guilty of homophobia and did not defend themselves
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 24/12/2010
.
.
.
As Perceived From A Tory Blog Viewpoint!!
.
Hi,
an interesting summary of the mess created by Farage’s professionalism in his Party – as ever!
However I do find fault with the title:
UKIP found guilty of homophobia – because they forgot to defend themselves!
As surely it would be more honest and thus less misleading if it pointed out:
UKIP found guilty of homophobia and did not defend themselves
as clearly the title actually given implies they were not guilty but were found guilty due to their lack of competence and professionalism. Studying the evidence led The Judge found that Ms. Sinclaire had made a ‘well founded’ case. Clearly implying her case was convincing based upon the facts and evidence.
However vigerous UKIP may be after the event does not alter the fact that the case is ‘Well founded’ and is merely yet another act of unprofessional incompetence in throwing good money after bad defending indefencible behaviour.
Rather embarrassingly for UKIP their pleading would seem to include a disregard and contempt for British Justice and a belief on their part YET AGAIN that The EU provides better law which YET AGAIN they will try to hide behind to flout British Justice.
The hypocracy of Farage’s Party is quite staggering and even now having displayed their incompetence we have their fools and mouth pieces snearing at the Courts and the plaintiff bringing UKIP yet further into disrepute. Just for a moment consider what a ghastly job a Farage Party would make if it was ever responsible for anything of consequence – though UKIP members may seek principled concepts and Farage may be a spokesman for such as a performer it is clear UKIP has no future without a competent leader of some ability rather than a strutting poppinjay bereft of morality, ethics or any Officer Qualities however loudly he may bray!
UKIP found guilty of homophobia – because they forgot to defend themselves!
In an act of sheer incompetence today UKIP have been declared guilty-by-default of homophobia after MEP Nikki Sinclaire lodged a complaint against the party and they failed to submit a defence. The openly lesbian MEP claimed she was unfairly expelled from the party after she refused to join its European Parliament grouping, claiming members of the Italian Lega Nord party were “homophobic”.
The Eurosceptic movement needs it!
To view the original article CLICK HERE
Interestingly it will be noted that Nikki Sinclaire actually resigned from The EFD with the full approval of her issue of principle by UKIP’s puppet leader Malcolm Lord Pearson as sjhe had stated clearly her desire not to be assicuiated with Nigel Farage’s Pan EU Political Party Group Ther EFD on the grounds of their extreme racism, xenophobia, Holocaust denial and anti Jewish behaviour as manifest by its leading members.
As I recall no mention of Homophobia was mentioned until some 2 months later when UKIP leadership made much of Nikki Sinclaire’s perversion as a homosexual were claimed to be her reason.
It will be noted that although openly stated to be a homosexual as the perversion is totally legal Sinclaire has always rejected the concept of making capital or status from her homosexuality. Including having refused to be associated with any homosexual grouping within UKIP claiming there should be no such grouping as all members should be treated equally. This is a principle on which she has made a public stance as on the media programme ‘Queer Question Time’ when on the matter of violence against homosexuals should be addressed she rather upset some by saying all violence should be addressed equally with no preference to protect homosexuals.
UKIP’s position is completely untennable as shown by the Judge in his statement that Sinclaire’s claim was ‘well founded’ and clearly it is as membership of The EFD is ultra vires to UKIP’s own constitution yet UKIP claim Sinclaire was dismissed the whip and victimised for refusal to sit with the morally reprehensible EFD of which Farage has chosen to be a member for his party – remember this WAS AGREED as a laudable stance by Pearson!
A further sabotage to UKIP, Farage & Bloom’s wrigglings by way of defence would seem to be the fact that Mike Nattrass MEP likewise refused to sit with The EFD yet he has not been in any way penalised by Farage’s Party leading any right minded individual to seek the difference between Nattrass & Sinclaire under the circumstances and thus it is reasonable to assume Farage orchestrated removal of Sinclaire based unlawfully on prejudice as an homosexual and or as a woman..
Ukip-vs-EUkip 
We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse. No comment has EVER been barred or deleted which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual. You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner. We welcome genuine comments.