#0117* – Prof. Tim Congdon CBE’s UKIP Leadership Election Web Site is now up and running
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
Prof. Tim Congdon CBE’s UKIP Leadership Election Web Site is now up and running!
#Doc026C01* – CONGDON – LEADERSHIP 4 UKIP Runners & Riders 2010
Announced 19-08-2010
Professor Tim G. Congdon CBE
Professor Tim G. Congdon CBE
Tim Congdon’s Election Web Site is now up and running
For The Address & More Details
Firstly before making the obvious statements
– May I congratulate Gerard Batten for putting the wellbeing of UKIP before his personal interests, by standing down as a leadership candidate, it is well apreciated that he got 26% in the mock leadership election of 2009, without Farage standing but clearly he would have cost Tim Congdon votes had he insisted in standing yet have risked embarrassment.
Congratulations to Gerard Batten who has, by this action, done the very first thing that I have ever been able to praise him for!
Let us hope this is a lesson to others who might still be tempted to stand – though I fully appreciate that David Bannerman is neither a real candidate, nor the real man he claims to be, he is as ever, once he emerges from The OLAF enquiry into his fraudulent use of public money, as ever he was – merely butt boy for Farage, standing to split the vote of the informed UKIP members who can not be bought off by salary or status and know enough to know what a catastrophic leader Nigel Farage, has been, is and might still sadly be!
The exception of course is the hope that Mad Monkton might yet stand as nothing would favour Tim’s campaign more as clearly he would attract some votes based upon his Father’s title and other people’s Climate Change & Global warming debunking, which never seems to be acknowledged by this serial liar (no wonder he supports Farage!). Let us hope he stands as his votes will in the main come from Farage’s normal (I use the word with caution) voters.
Now for the obvious – Good luck to Tim Congdon though I fear he has an uphill battle ahead – I would like to see Tim Congdon win of the candidates on offer as he is the only candidate who brings any integrity, gravitas, competence or personal success to the Party. Congdon has made considerable money by the use of his own brain and unlike Farage was a success in banking and finance selling his business to Lehman Bros. as I recall, for a substantial amount and being retained as a consultant/adviser.
Tim Congdon may not have the charismatic qualities that sell well in the village hall, but he has the competence to impress a City audience or annual sales meeting of a major Financial services concern or banking Group or Inns of Court gathering and happily able to address the Mansion House or Brughes Group with gravitas and not be caught urinating in the plant pots with a drunken Godfrey Bloom, or involved in chavvery in a lap dancing club with Farage and his parasites – with greater self respect he can lead the party forward to its next phase rather than endlessly repeating the mistakes of Farage, Bannerman, Dartmouth, Monkton and the like so stupid they expect different results and are completely reliant on dishonesty and luck!
I have grave doubts over Steve Allison who based on his own track record I would trust as far as I could kick him – it was he who so recently advocated Pan EU Political Parties, it was he who was angling for a run at MEPship, it was he who was all over Farage like a cheap suit – when surrounded by undeniable corruption and dishonesty did this little man ever speak out?
Not a man I would trust and one I would not be remotely surprised to see acting in character and using all he has learned to act in his own personal interest by betrayal at the most crucial time – Tim Congdon would seem to stand for EVERYTHING that Steve Allison has NOT stood for!
Tim Congdon’s contact details:
Office phone no. 01452 – 830 840
mobile no. 07876 – 684 308
Good Luck to Professor Tim Congdon
– I believe he offers UKIP members their best hopes for the future.
Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate)
to Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
Ukip-vs-EUkip 
@mrbassman25 Even though I’m a lawyer, I didn’t go to college until I was almost 40, then I just paid attention to the technical aspects of business & law. Now I see that law education was bunk, bogus. But in grade school I didn’t pay much attention. I only went to high school 3 years & when I was there, again, I passed without paying attention. I’ve never watched-read-listened to main media. So I never got the full brainwashing. That’s why I’m asking – I really don’t understand mass-mind.
@mrbassman25
all that said…. the Liberal democrats were voted into power along with conservatives… so people have atleast started switching votes.
@Marleyites
i don’t think people care to be honest. This country has been bred to either be a Labour or a Conservative voter, Conservative for the rich, Labour for the poorer.
People can’t get out of that mindset, it’s one or the other and usually it’s drummed into them from birth, just the same as over there too i guess.
from what i’ve seen is that any publicity UKIP get… it’s usually bad. as with other parties…. though im sure most parties are just as corrupt and fake
@mrbassman25 Thanks for the response! Sounds like the same story as here … someone who would help the people, bring liberty & justice for all isn’t given airtime so people don’t really know about them, except what they hear taken out of context or misquoted. There’s enough about what they say that is so suspicious & nonsensical that you’d think people would go looking outside of mainstream for answers & solutions. Would they switch if they could see these vids?
@Marleyites
UKIP don’t get much airtime or good press over here, people tend to think they are another racist BNP, as we all know Nigel rightly has issues with illegal immigration but it always gets taken out of context. I guess it’s just cause there are so many sheep over here too !!
Although the last election saw Britain divided in order for a coalition government meaning two party’s are ment to run the country together! and that goes into a whole new story!!
@mrbassman25 I’ve always wondered why UK citizens don’t ALL just love this man & the UKIP party? From here in U.S., it looks like he’d be The Man to run your country. Do you have any insight as to what the problem is with voters in UK that they aren’t in favor of this UKIP + Farage?
@TrueBlueJMS We need him here. He’s much better than Obama
We need to kidnap Farage, ship him to the US, and run him for president!!!
The Brussels Broadcasting Corporation is a disgrace.
Nigel farage always eats them up!
I noticed on a google link that the CBBC website is very much biased in favour of the EU. There is literally no argument put against it, and false hopes and lies inhabit the so called “benefits” that are shown to young viewers. This is what the apparently “politically neutral” BBC is showing our children. Only last century did extreme regimes do the same to young children – albeit in a far more obvious, provocative and far from subtle manner – yet the BBC do the same nonetheless! Have a look…
Nigel is precisely right. What will save us in this recession? Taxing a damaged nation making it even poorer? Or lowering taxis to encourage the rich to invest here and giving young businesses a better chance? I know which one I would choose…
i’m poor and i totally agree with what he’s saying.
@DreadLaw2 Steven Sackur the interviewer does get millions of complaints but its from the left and the right, he was specifically criticized for interview of Noam Chomsky last year. He’s not biggoted in any way he will attack an person that goes on his show and makes them prove their convictions. In all the time I have watched the show I have never been able to truly figure out what his views actually are, in oneinterview he seems like a clear conservative and in another a crazy leftist.
The interviewer is a Prick with a capital ‘P’.
BBC impartial, bollocks!
That’s because they accept lots of money from the EU!
You have to remember, UKIP is controlled opposition. It’s supposed to be there to look stupid. Mr Farage knows he will never win anything.
@32GaugeSlug
it certainly frees the mind m8, youtube is brilliant cause you can choose what to watch, things that mainstreem tv networks would never dream of airing…
it’s a pity more dont follow suit! good on you!!!!
A nice attack piece here. Listen to the language this interviewer uses. It’s like they’re trained in covert language.
@mrbassman25 haha same here!! Good job on the ridding yourself of the TV!! The last thing I watched was something on Steven Hawking about 3 years ago. It frees the mind!
“Europe isn’t on the list?” Well, its on my list and I’ll be voting against the European stepping stone to World Government.
God the BBC dont even pretend to be neutral
I’ll be voting ukip but if only they could actually win the election. UKIP’s policies are clever and well thought out. Just imagine how much money we could save just from leaving the EU! A UKIP government would put Great Britian back on its feet 
I don”t know why nIgel does not emphasize UKIP are not a single issue party their website is chock fll of policies on the widest range of issues
@stuanemma
I know what you mean, me too.However, I would recommend watching the interview I suggested, very interesting information indeed. I am still not sure how to take the interviewee’s ukip comment, I am still keeping an open mind on the subject and until I see evidence to support his theory shall still be doing what I am doing. Thanks for commenting
@eldrak21 If I had a penny every time I heard this same story……
@goingalt You have Ron Paul.
this interviewer understands nothing about economics and how to create wealth and prosperity.
he’s simply a mouthpiece for tired lefty ideologies.
Might it be worth remembering the source on this CLICK HERE
Particularly when considering the libelous content and that WITHIN 24 hours of posting the material on their site they had some 25 comments and an unknown number of hits – one can only then consider just howmany hits a rather better known BBC may reasonably have had since March 2010 and there is in no situation a defence against repeating or republishing a libel – one wonders on howmany other sites this has appeared.
That this long after the event it is being reposted and also featuring on Google must add to the gravity of the defamation but there is of course a year from that first showing relative to the BBC and sites such as YouTube where UkipMedia have had over 5,000 viewings since they conciously posted it on 31-Mar-2010 and http://www.membershipfire.com/?p=1383 whose posting was yesterday – each has a year in which appropriate cease and desist letters and warning of further action can be issued.
I find myself in a strange position as in order to publish the item of news I have no choice but to publish the libel my Farage and The BBC! I would hope that a Court would consider that an acceptable use as it seeks to redress the libel!