<!–var googleUrl="/telegraph/template/ver1-0/templates/fragments/search/components/google/GAFSTransform.jsp?";function doneGAFShtml (htmlstr) { //alert(htmlstr); htmlstr = htmlstr.split("<").join("”).join(“>”).split(“&”).join(“&”); var parts = htmlstr.split(“[BREAK]”); var slot1 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot1”); var slot2 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot2”); if (parts[0] != null) { slot1.innerHTML=parts[0]; if (parts[1] != null) { slot2.innerHTML=parts[1]; } }}function initGoogleWS () { var ajaxgws = new AJAXInteraction(googleUrl+’q=%22tim+Congdon%22&ua=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows%3B+U%3B+Windows+NT+5.1%3B+en-US%3B+rv%3A1.9.1.10%29+Gecko%2F20100504+Firefox%2F3.5.10+%28+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729%29&ip=81.129.95.33&p=’, null, doneGAFShtml); ajaxgws.doGet();}initGoogleWS();//–>

<!–var googleUrl="/telegraph/template/ver1-0/templates/fragments/search/components/google/GAFSTransform.jsp?";function doneGAFShtml (htmlstr) { //alert(htmlstr); htmlstr = htmlstr.split("<").join("”).join(“>”).split(“&”).join(“&”); var parts = htmlstr.split(“[BREAK]”); var slot1 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot1”); var slot2 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot2”); if (parts[0] != null) { slot1.innerHTML=parts[0]; if (parts[1] != null) { slot2.innerHTML=parts[1]; } }}function initGoogleWS () { var ajaxgws = new AJAXInteraction(googleUrl+’q=%22tim+Congdon%22&ua=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows%3B+U%3B+Windows+NT+5.1%3B+en-US%3B+rv%3A1.9.1.10%29+Gecko%2F20100504+Firefox%2F3.5.10+%28+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729%29&ip=81.129.95.33&p=’, null, doneGAFShtml); ajaxgws.doGet();}initGoogleWS();//–>

var gaJsHost = ((“https:” == document.location.protocol) ? “https://ssl.&#8221; : “http://www.&#8221;);document.write(unescape(“%3Cscript src='” + gaJsHost + “google-analytics.com/ga.js’ type=’text/javascript’%3E%3C/script%3E”)); try {var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(“UA-7226372-1”);pageTracker._trackPageview();} catch(err) {}

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

<!–var googleUrl="/telegraph/template/ver1-0/templates/fragments/search/components/google/GAFSTransform.jsp?";function doneGAFShtml (htmlstr) { //alert(htmlstr); htmlstr = htmlstr.split("<").join("”).join(“>”).split(“&”).join(“&”); var parts = htmlstr.split(“[BREAK]”); var slot1 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot1”); var slot2 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot2”); if (parts[0] != null) { slot1.innerHTML=parts[0]; if (parts[1] != null) { slot2.innerHTML=parts[1]; } }}function initGoogleWS () { var ajaxgws = new AJAXInteraction(googleUrl+’q=%22tim+Congdon%22&ua=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows%3B+U%3B+Windows+NT+5.1%3B+en-US%3B+rv%3A1.9.1.10%29+Gecko%2F20100504+Firefox%2F3.5.10+%28+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729%29&ip=81.129.95.33&p=’, null, doneGAFShtml); ajaxgws.doGet();}initGoogleWS();//–>

Clear majorities of the British people want their country to leave the European Union. 

A recent YouGov poll found that 47 per cent wanted the UK out of the EU, compared with 33 per cent who preferred to stay in. 

Bizarrely, the latest Eurobarometer of public attitudes (financed by the European Commission) had earlier demonstrated a similar result. It showed that 33 per cent of its UK respondents regarded the EU as “a bad thing”, while 29 per cent viewed it as a “a good thing”. 

The current widespread opposition to the EU is hardly surprising, as EU interventions in our national life are now disrupting longestablished traditions, undermining revered institutions and damaging livelihoods. 

The Commission, the Council of Ministers and their secretariats have used the passage of the Lisbon TreatyWorking Time Directive on the efficiency of British medicine and the National Health Service.  last year as the pretext for further encroachments on the EU member states, including the UK. The last few months have seen a media furore over the effects of the

For many decades junior doctors have acquired experience – the experience which is essential if they are to be real doctors and not parrots of the textbooks – by working very long hours in real-world, often life-or-death clinical settings. Now, because of the Working Time Directive, they are prevented by law from this practice. 

With lives being put in jeopardy by an EU directive, the puzzle is not that almost half of British people want to leave the EU, but why a third still believe in staying in. More and more people are angry and resentful about how EU decisions are affecting them in their daily lives. 

There is a growing discrepancy between popular hostility to the EU and the willingness of successive British governments to hand over so-called “competences” to EU control. 

This discrepancy is dangerous. When people believe that politicians are out-of-touch and untrustworthy, and ignore what they want, the risk of civil disobedience increases. In a modern democracy politicians must respect the wishes of citizens and voters. The case for a referendum on the UK’s continued membership of the EU is now overwhelming. 

The 2009 Lisbon Treaty was undoubtedly a radical change in the constitutional arrangements of every EU member state, including the UK. All three of the main parties gave clear pledges in their manifestos at the 2005 general election to hold a referendum in the event of another big European constitutional upheaval. 

Yet all three of them then judged that the Lisbon Treaty was not important enough to justify the holding of a referendum. 

This is scandalous, an orchestrated insult to the intelligence of the British electorate. Britain must have a referendum on its membership of the European Union.

That referendum needs to be held as soon as possible, to stop more damage being done to our traditions, our institutions and our way of life.

To sign The Petition Right Away:

http://www.haveyoursay.eu/

Clear majorities of the British people want their country to leave the European Union. 

A recent YouGov poll found that 47 per cent wanted the UK out of the EU, compared with 33 per cent who preferred to stay in. 

Bizarrely, the latest Eurobarometer of public attitudes (financed by the European Commission) had earlier demonstrated a similar result. It showed that 33 per cent of its UK respondents regarded the EU as “a bad thing”, while 29 per cent viewed it as a “a good thing”. 

The current widespread opposition to the EU is hardly surprising, as EU interventions in our national life are now disrupting longestablished traditions, undermining revered institutions and damaging livelihoods. 

The Commission, the Council of Ministers and their secretariats have used the passage of the Lisbon TreatyWorking Time Directive on the efficiency of British medicine and the National Health Service.  last year as the pretext for further encroachments on the EU member states, including the UK. The last few months have seen a media furore over the effects of the

For many decades junior doctors have acquired experience – the experience which is essential if they are to be real doctors and not parrots of the textbooks – by working very long hours in real-world, often life-or-death clinical settings. Now, because of the Working Time Directive, they are prevented by law from this practice. 

With lives being put in jeopardy by an EU directive, the puzzle is not that almost half of British people want to leave the EU, but why a third still believe in staying in. More and more people are angry and resentful about how EU decisions are affecting them in their daily lives. 

There is a growing discrepancy between popular hostility to the EU and the willingness of successive British governments to hand over so-called “competences” to EU control. 

This discrepancy is dangerous. When people believe that politicians are out-of-touch and untrustworthy, and ignore what they want, the risk of civil disobedience increases. In a modern democracy politicians must respect the wishes of citizens and voters. The case for a referendum on the UK’s continued membership of the EU is now overwhelming. 

The 2009 Lisbon Treaty was undoubtedly a radical change in the constitutional arrangements of every EU member state, including the UK. All three of the main parties gave clear pledges in their manifestos at the 2005 general election to hold a referendum in the event of another big European constitutional upheaval. 

Yet all three of them then judged that the Lisbon Treaty was not important enough to justify the holding of a referendum. 

This is scandalous, an orchestrated insult to the intelligence of the British electorate. Britain must have a referendum on its membership of the European Union.

That referendum needs to be held as soon as possible, to stop more damage being done to our traditions, our institutions and our way of life.

To sign The Petition Right Away:

http://www.haveyoursay.eu/

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

<!–var googleUrl="/telegraph/template/ver1-0/templates/fragments/search/components/google/GAFSTransform.jsp?";function doneGAFShtml (htmlstr) { //alert(htmlstr); htmlstr = htmlstr.split("<").join("”).join(“>”).split(“&”).join(“&”); var parts = htmlstr.split(“[BREAK]”); var slot1 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot1”); var slot2 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot2”); if (parts[0] != null) { slot1.innerHTML=parts[0]; if (parts[1] != null) { slot2.innerHTML=parts[1]; } }}function initGoogleWS () { var ajaxgws = new AJAXInteraction(googleUrl+’q=%22tim+Congdon%22&ua=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows%3B+U%3B+Windows+NT+5.1%3B+en-US%3B+rv%3A1.9.1.10%29+Gecko%2F20100504+Firefox%2F3.5.10+%28+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729%29&ip=81.129.95.33&p=’, null, doneGAFShtml); ajaxgws.doGet();}initGoogleWS();//–>

Clear majorities of the British people want their country to leave the European Union. 

A recent YouGov poll found that 47 per cent wanted the UK out of the EU, compared with 33 per cent who preferred to stay in. 

Bizarrely, the latest Eurobarometer of public attitudes (financed by the European Commission) had earlier demonstrated a similar result. It showed that 33 per cent of its UK respondents regarded the EU as “a bad thing”, while 29 per cent viewed it as a “a good thing”. 

The current widespread opposition to the EU is hardly surprising, as EU interventions in our national life are now disrupting longestablished traditions, undermining revered institutions and damaging livelihoods. 

The Commission, the Council of Ministers and their secretariats have used the passage of the Lisbon TreatyWorking Time Directive on the efficiency of British medicine and the National Health Service.  last year as the pretext for further encroachments on the EU member states, including the UK. The last few months have seen a media furore over the effects of the

For many decades junior doctors have acquired experience – the experience which is essential if they are to be real doctors and not parrots of the textbooks – by working very long hours in real-world, often life-or-death clinical settings. Now, because of the Working Time Directive, they are prevented by law from this practice. 

With lives being put in jeopardy by an EU directive, the puzzle is not that almost half of British people want to leave the EU, but why a third still believe in staying in. More and more people are angry and resentful about how EU decisions are affecting them in their daily lives. 

There is a growing discrepancy between popular hostility to the EU and the willingness of successive British governments to hand over so-called “competences” to EU control. 

This discrepancy is dangerous. When people believe that politicians are out-of-touch and untrustworthy, and ignore what they want, the risk of civil disobedience increases. In a modern democracy politicians must respect the wishes of citizens and voters. The case for a referendum on the UK’s continued membership of the EU is now overwhelming. 

The 2009 Lisbon Treaty was undoubtedly a radical change in the constitutional arrangements of every EU member state, including the UK. All three of the main parties gave clear pledges in their manifestos at the 2005 general election to hold a referendum in the event of another big European constitutional upheaval. 

Yet all three of them then judged that the Lisbon Treaty was not important enough to justify the holding of a referendum. 

This is scandalous, an orchestrated insult to the intelligence of the British electorate. Britain must have a referendum on its membership of the European Union.

That referendum needs to be held as soon as possible, to stop more damage being done to our traditions, our institutions and our way of life.

To sign The Petition Right Away:

http://www.haveyoursay.eu/

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

<!–var googleUrl="/telegraph/template/ver1-0/templates/fragments/search/components/google/GAFSTransform.jsp?";function doneGAFShtml (htmlstr) { //alert(htmlstr); htmlstr = htmlstr.split("<").join("”).join(“>”).split(“&”).join(“&”); var parts = htmlstr.split(“[BREAK]”); var slot1 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot1”); var slot2 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot2”); if (parts[0] != null) { slot1.innerHTML=parts[0]; if (parts[1] != null) { slot2.innerHTML=parts[1]; } }}function initGoogleWS () { var ajaxgws = new AJAXInteraction(googleUrl+’q=%22tim+Congdon%22&ua=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows%3B+U%3B+Windows+NT+5.1%3B+en-US%3B+rv%3A1.9.1.10%29+Gecko%2F20100504+Firefox%2F3.5.10+%28+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729%29&ip=81.129.95.33&p=’, null, doneGAFShtml); ajaxgws.doGet();}initGoogleWS();//–>

PAKSAS, Rolandas

To view his EU web site CLICK HERE

Rolandas PAKSAS is a member of the vile racist, sexually intollerant, xenophobic EFD, which not only espouses and incites violence in pursuit of its political aims but also practices such violence and in association supporting pro EU Politicians and some with an overt anti Jewish stance. That The Pan EU Political Party EFD grouping is partly defined by its homophobia is irrefutable.

With hindsight it seems Farage did not act on principles but seemingly for personal gain in the IndDemGroup as he seems all too willing to prostitute his party, his Country and his principles now that it happens to suit him financially and in terms of authority in forming his squalid Pan EU Political Party grouping of The EFD.

It is also noted his untrustworthy and duplicitous little side kick Mark Croucher is also acting with Farage to assist in the promotion of this Racist homophobic claque when previously he made much of telling lies about people to try to damage them by falsely branding them as anti Jewish, BNP supporters and anti homosexual based on his own concocted lies. We note it is he who actually practices and assists these disgusting values! 

Dear Greg

 

I hope that you are keeping well.

 

I am pleased to confirm that our process server has served Mark Croucher on 29th September 2010.  If payment is not received within 21 days, we can issue a bankruptcy petition against him if those are your instructions.

 

I will update you with any news in the interim.

 

Kind regards

 

Rhodri

	Rhodri Jones Solicitor Commercial Litigation Hugh James

Insider Property Law Firm of the Year 2010

I have today thus instructed.

Currently Mark Croucher has an unresolved debt to me by order of The British Courts of C£8.5K + any additional costs I may accrue.

Currently UKIP have an unresolved debt to me of £12.5K

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

But what made him change his mind? He was bought.

One reason UKIP MEPs are short-staffed is that staff contracts were handed over to smaller delegations as an incentive to join Farage’s group. This has proven a useful bargaining chip: for example, whilst many UKIP MEPs have no staff in their offices, the one French MEP, Philippe de Villiers, who actually stood for Libertas in the euro-elections, has three staff members. No less than five French staff members, with political connections to de Villiers, are employed to run the EFD group secretariat.

This is the price that UKIP MEPs pay for the “privilege” of belonging to a political group.

Rolandas Paksas is no political lightweight. In fact, he has been both Prime Minister and President of his country, at various times.

One might ask why he felt the need to abandon high office, and sit as an MEP. This is where it gets interesting.

In 2004, following allegations about his connections with the Russian mafia, Paksas made history by becoming the first European head of state to be removed by impeachment.

He denied the allegations, of course, but eventually he changed tack, and announced that the businessman at the centre of the scandal, Yuri Borisov, who Paksas employed as a special adviser had pressured him into wrong doing.

On April 6, 2004, the Lithuanian Parliament voted on three charges: that he had leaked classified information about the investigation into Borisov; that he had improperly restored Borisov’s citizenship; and that he had interfered in a privatisation transaction.

Paksas will fit in well with the EFD – there are lots of crooks there!

And they wonder why Nikki Sinclaire left the group!

To view the original article CLICK HERE

For More FACTS Regarding The EFD with relevant Links CLICK HERE

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

Goddersukip

 See This Twit’s TWITTERINGS CLICK HERE

Childish or what CLICK HERE

Monday, 07 December 2009 13:23

Legend has it that Cnut the Great, Viking King of England, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, 985-1035, once commanded the waves to stop. Two versions of this story exist, one holding that Cnut really believed that he could do such a thing, the other telling that Cnut’s stunt was merely intended to show that he possessed only the power of any other mortal. Either version contains a lesson in humility for the leaders of the world now assembling in Copenhagen. They believe that with just a stroke of their bureaucratic pens they can control the elements. A directive can be issued, and LO! Climate change will be stopped in its tracks. There is a gulf between the minds of the Great and the Good and reality. They are under the misapprehension that we can command the natural world. Even worse, for us, they think that their meeting to create a ‘global deal’ on CO2 emissions will result in world peace, environmental utopia, and every single human on earth dancing for joy at the prospect of being subject to carbon laws, regulation, and taxes. Yippeeeee! No more flights! Waheeey! No more cars! Yahooo! No electricity! One complete bunch of Cnuts – the editorial team at the Guardian newspaper – believes that it, along with 56 other publications throughout the world, can rightly issue instructions to the world through their editorial columns. The group of 56 newspapers today issued a statement simultaneously urging that there were just ‘fourteen days to seal history’s judgment on this generation’. The science is complex but the facts are clear. The world needs to take steps to limit temperature rises to 2C, an aim that will require global emissions to peak and begin falling within the next 5-10 years. A bigger rise of 3-4C — the smallest increase we can prudently expect to follow inaction — would parch continents, turning farmland into desert. Half of all species could become extinct, untold millions of people would be displaced, whole nations drowned by the sea. The controversy over emails by British researchers that suggest they tried to suppress inconvenient data has muddied the waters but failed to dent the mass of evidence on which these predictions are based. There is no science which says that 2 degrees is a special point, and that a temperature rise of 3 to 4 degrees will produce the consequences that the Guardian’s biblical prophecies foretell. These are just political targets, dreamt up by political activists. There is no scientific ‘evidence’ on which such predictions are based, and there are no predictions, just the Guardian’s fantasy. There is nothing like this in the IPCC reports. They have made it up. If you can show me otherwise, please be my guest. Complete Cnuts ex-Beatle, Paul McCartney, and IPCC Chair, Rajendra Pachauri were in Brussels last week, pushing lentils. They want to persuade the EU to persuade its citizens to stop eating meat because, according to them, eating meat causes climate change. This is the kind of nonsense that the Copenhagen conference (and the EU) is all about – bossing people about, telling them how they should live their lives and what to have for dinner. We had a barbecue in Brussels to let McCartney and Pachauri know what we thought of their silly plan. Paul Nuttal and me, eating sausages at McCartney and Pachauri. Silly Cnut, the Prince of Wales has been invited to Copenhagen by the Danish government, according to the Times. He will travel to the Danish capital in a seven-seat RAF aircraft. His spokeswoman said that it was not possible to travel on a scheduled flight because of prior engagements and the risk of being delayed. … In Brazil earlier this year the Prince warned that fighting global warming should have a higher priority on the world’s agenda than fighting poverty, and that there were only eight years left to save the planet. It’s easy for Cnut’s like Prince Charles to convince themselves that private jets are necessary for their job of saving the planet, and that poverty is just a trivial problem. He ought to be setting an example, and cycling to Copenhagen. But Charles won’t be the only Cnut travelling to and around Copenhagen in luxury. The Telegraph reports that On a normal day, Majken Friss Jorgensen, managing director of Copenhagen’s biggest limousine company, says her firm has twelve vehicles on the road. During the “summit to save the world”, which opens here tomorrow, she will have 200. … The airport says it is expecting up to 140 extra private jets during the peak period alone, so far over its capacity that the planes will have to fly off to regional airports – or to Sweden – to park, returning to Copenhagen to pick up their VIP passengers. You see, while the world’s top brass pat themselves on the back, arranging for international agreements about what to do with your money, and how to tax and regulate your life, they will be tucking into some of the finest grub in the world, staying in luxurious hotels, and swanning about in carbon-guzzling vehicles, all under the pretence that they are ‘saving the planet’. The Telegraph mentions some other Cnuts… As well 15,000 delegates and officials, 5,000 journalists and 98 world leaders, the Danish capital will be blessed by the presence of Leonardo DiCaprio, Daryl Hannah, Helena Christensen, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Prince Charles. What possible use is there for actor Leonardo DiCaprio at an international conference on climate change? Is it a movie? It’s certainly based on fiction. Maybe he’s playing the Cnut? Remember, you can’t go to this conference to have your say about your own future, and nobody has asked you what you want the British or EU governments to do in Copenhagen. But DiCaprio is given VIP treatment. All you need to get a seat at this table, it seems, is the right number of millions of dollars in the bank. Then everyone will celebrate your heroic efforts to prevent Armageddon. Meanwhile, you and I will have to pick up the tab for this face-stuffing opportunity for the rich and famous, and live with the aftermath. Our Prime Minister, who is widely regarded as perhaps the biggest Cnut in the whole country, said in the Observer, yesterday, Let no one be in any doubt about the overwhelming scientific evidence that underpins the Copenhagen conference. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change brings together over 4,000 scientists from every corner of the world. Their recent work has sharpened, not diminished, the huge and diverse body of evidence of human-made global warming. Its landmark importance cannot be wished away by the theft of a few emails from one university research centre. On the contrary, the pernicious anti-scientific backlash that the emails have unleashed has exposed just what is at stake. Like his idiot pal, Prescott, Brown has plucked the figure of 4,000 scientists out of thin air. There aren’t 4,000 contributing scientists to the IPCC, as I pointed out a few weeks ago. Why aren’t our most senior politicians in command of the facts? How can they expect us to beleive that they can control the weather if they can’t get such basic matters clear in the minds?Simple numbers like 4,000 and simple facts about the structure and operation of the IPCC ought to be well within their grasp. The purpose of the climate change deniers’ campaign is clear, and the timing no coincidence. It is designed to destabilise and undermine the efforts of the countries gathering in Copenhagen today. Too bloody right we want to destabilise and undermine the big party at Copenhagen, Mr. Brown. The reason is that you’re a bunch of self-serving Cnuts, who can’t even get your own facts straight. This much is plain: you don’t know what you’re talking about, nobody voted for you to be PM, and nobody voted for the action you are committing the UK to at Copenhagen. You should worry less about the made up ‘scientific consensus’, and think more about what public opinion says.

Childish or what CLICK HERE

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

LEADERSHIP UPDATES 2010   

Clean EUkip up NOW  &  make UKIP electable!  
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership,   
their anti UKIP claque in POWER &   
the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

LEADERSHIP UPDATES 2010 – As they said when going aloft – WATCH THE RIGGING ! 

IF you want to keep up to date in the UKIP Leadership saga just CLICK HERE

The Runners and Riders are listed with regularly updated material.

At the moment it LOOKS as if the cheating has already started!

LINE UP FOR THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES!

Dr. Eric Edmond would seem to have been cheated out of the opportunity to stand by a Kangaroo Court decision to summarily chuck him out of the party for telling the truth – Now banned in the crazy world of UKIP.

It seems it is a sackable offence to point out the ways in which the NEC and Party leadership have brought the party into disrepute! Clearly the lunatics are running the asylum.

We hear the serial candidate Winston McKenzie plans to stand but I presume he is confused what the party is as yet – PERHAPS he only heard the word Party and will turn up with what is left of his brother’s pub!

Then we have some chappie called Jason Smith threatening to step up to the plate – more later!

You can ALWAYS check the Right SideBar for more direct click details!

#0073* – UKIP – FARAGE – The CRASH & PRAISE WHERE IT IS DUE  

Clean EUkip up NOW  &  make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER &  the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

UKIP – FARAGE – The CRASH & PRAISE WHERE IT IS DUE

YET TO BE WRITTEN SEE LATER!

#0064* ~  Oh So Very True 

Clean EUkip up NOW  &  make UKIP electable!  
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER &  the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

 Oh So Very True! ~ ONE CAN PUT A NAME TO EACH!

Hi,

a friend of mine noted this quote in a study of primates and felt I might have some undertanding of the concept, as I am always questing for the truth and to expose corruption and abuse.

The suggestion was that I have it laid out in calligraphy and framed on my office wall, above the computer, to understand the actions of abusers, politicians and their parasites why they behave that way when challenged.

Ahhh, technology.

Once, you had to travel half-way around the globe to watch fascinating, primitive primate rituals.

Now, you log on to one of the Forum sites or UKIP’s NEC election site and watch their ‘cabal & sychophants’ to watch them do it from the comfort of your armchair.

#0063* – Ukippers Must Learn How To Count Vegetables Into A Bag 
– Hat Tip to The Tap Blog   

Clean EUkip up NOW  &  make UKIP electable!  
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership,   
their anti UKIP claque in POWER &  the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
 
Ukippers Must Learn How To Count Vegetables Into A Bag
– Hat Tip to The Tap Blog!
Which came up on Google at: http://riddickro.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/4626/ 

Ukippers Must Learn How To Count Vegetables Into A Bag

People who voted UKIP in the General Election voted with their hearts. It felt good to be saying ‘No more Europe’ and to be cheering along to Nigel Farage’s excellent speeches. But look at the effects.

The Conservatives were moving, glacially but nonetheless moving, in a eurosceptic direction. Now they are locked in a coalition, which negates all the progress made, and has pushed euroscepticism off the government’s agenda. Just a few thousand of the million or so UKIP votes could have prevented the coalition, and the loss of the gains so painfully made inside the Conservative Party over the last ten years.

Things are not stopping there. The two europhile parties, Labour and Libdem, before the coalition formed, were divided. It made it possible to look forward to a Conservative majority with only 40% of the vote. The coalition is having the effect now of crashing support for the Lib Dems, mostly pushing it back to Labour, making the europhiles into a single strong force under the Labour flag.

A great opportunity has been lost to keep the europhiles separated.

The only way that a eurosceptic government will finally arrive at Westminster, will be through a Conservative majority. If the Conservative leadership is compromised by cryptic support for the EU, then only will a revolt from the Conservative backbenches bring in a leadership that fights for British independence. There is no other electoral possibility.

But EUkippers don’t see it.

In 2005, Blair might have been deprived of a majority if eurosceptics had all voted Conservative. Many are non-voters. A coalition between Liberal and Labour would have resulted, and the Conservative Party would have been driven onto an even more strongly eurosceptic stance by the weight of eurosceptic numbers inside the tent.

In 2010 the damage of eurosceptics not voting Conservative has been even greater, with the coalition suppressing euroscepticism, and Labour resurgent by gathering opposition to the coalition.

The point is that there is only one Party that will get Britain out of the EU. It’s not Labour. It’s not Lib Dem. It’s not UKIP. Who’s left? Eurosceptics should rally and vote Conservative, and battle for control of the party.

The EU is winning the game this week with its obtaining of police powers, and the arrest of the five English boys and their transfer to Greek jails though they did nothing at all. Make no mistake. Control of the Conservative Party is the only battlefield that counts if we want to fight these pernicious developments.

The EU knows that, and their supporters. How come Nigel Farage gets so much airtime compared to Conservative eurosceptics? UKIP is a carefully calibrated game to divide British eurosceptics, and people are falling for it by the million.

UKIPpers buy into the emotion. Going UKIP feels good. Yet these people are just like me, from another age where a spade was a spade, a lb was a lb, a yard was a yard. One thing, however, which should please us all, has not changed, and that is the only thing that counts. We still have a First Past The Post electoral system. Why can’t the traditionalists, who cheer Farage, as I also do in my heart, understand the political system that they have inherited from history?

If we were counting carrots into a bag, I’m sure everyone would get it.

Maybe that’s it. Eurosceptics need to envision MPs as vegetables going into a bag. If there’s more blue cabbages than red cabbages, and the blue cabbages have been selected well, the battle of the bag is won. There’s no point in growing lost of purple cabbages, none of which will ever get into the bag. What UKIPpers and other eurosceptics must see is that there is only one bag. If they don’t vote Conservative, they are not even going to be in it. Somehow rationality must override emotion, if eurosceptics want to win. Ukippers have got to wise up.

See yesterday’s council election result from Rotherham –

Sitwell ward, Rotherham

Con – 45% (-13)

Lab – 32% (+12)

Lib Dem – 4% (-18)

Ind – 9%(+9)

UKIP – 9% (+9)

Con hold

Once a very safe Conservative seat, now with LIb Dems obliterated, Labour are back in contention. UKIP’s 9% is enough to mean that labour might stand a chance of winning. Any damage done by UKIP standing in General Elections in the past will be as nothing to what could happen next. Labour could win the next GE, if this pattern replicates. (I assume the Independent took previous Lib Dem votes. If so, more could have gone to Labour, making this a marginal ).

As for David Cameron, there is also still the chance, however remote, that he is playing a double game – cooperating with the EU for now, but ready to make moves when the time is right. That is not something to discount to zero, even now. But if, as time goes by, he shows himself to be a traitor, the only battle that matters is still for the Conservative Party, and getting blue cabbages into the bag.