Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • January 2026
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Archive for the ‘Peter REEVE’ Category

#0159* – CORRUPTION IS ENDEMIC IN FARAGE’S UKIP – AS EVER

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 18/10/2010

#0159* – CORRUPTION IS ENDEMIC IN FARAGE’S UKIP – AS EVER!  
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable! 
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!  
.
CORRUPTION IS ENDEMIC IN FARAGE’S UKIP – AS EVER!
WHORING, CAROUSING, URINATING IN THE HOTEL PASSAGES
THEFT, CORRUPTION, FRAUD, CHEATING, RACISM, ABUSE!

Even PAEDOPHELIA IT SEEMS

ALL DONE IN THE NAME of UKIP MEMBERS! <!–var googleUrl="/telegraph/template/ver1-0/templates/fragments/search/components/google/GAFSTransform.jsp?";function doneGAFShtml (htmlstr) { //alert(htmlstr); htmlstr = htmlstr.split("<").join("”).join(“>”).split(“&”).join(“&”); var parts = htmlstr.split(“[BREAK]”); var slot1 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot1”); var slot2 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot2”); if (parts[0] != null) { slot1.innerHTML=parts[0]; if (parts[1] != null) { slot2.innerHTML=parts[1]; } }}function initGoogleWS () { var ajaxgws = new AJAXInteraction(googleUrl+’q=%22tim+Congdon%22&ua=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows%3B+U%3B+Windows+NT+5.1%3B+en-US%3B+rv%3A1.9.1.10%29+Gecko%2F20100504+Firefox%2F3.5.10+%28+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729%29&ip=81.129.95.33&p=’, null, doneGAFShtml); ajaxgws.doGet();}initGoogleWS();//–>

var gaJsHost = ((“https:” == document.location.protocol) ? “https://ssl.&#8221; : “http://www.&#8221;);document.write(unescape(“%3Cscript src='” + gaJsHost + “google-analytics.com/ga.js’ type=’text/javascript’%3E%3C/script%3E”)); try {var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(“UA-7226372-1”);pageTracker._trackPageview();} catch(err) {} .

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~

<!–var googleUrl="/telegraph/template/ver1-0/templates/fragments/search/components/google/GAFSTransform.jsp?";function doneGAFShtml (htmlstr) { //alert(htmlstr); htmlstr = htmlstr.split("<").join("”).join(“>”).split(“&”).join(“&”); var parts = htmlstr.split(“[BREAK]”); var slot1 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot1”); var slot2 = document.getElementById(“gafsslot2”); if (parts[0] != null) { slot1.innerHTML=parts[0]; if (parts[1] != null) { slot2.innerHTML=parts[1]; } }}function initGoogleWS () { var ajaxgws = new AJAXInteraction(googleUrl+’q=%22tim+Congdon%22&ua=Mozilla%2F5.0+%28Windows%3B+U%3B+Windows+NT+5.1%3B+en-US%3B+rv%3A1.9.1.10%29+Gecko%2F20100504+Firefox%2F3.5.10+%28+.NET+CLR+3.5.30729%29&ip=81.129.95.33&p=’, null, doneGAFShtml); ajaxgws.doGet();}initGoogleWS();//–>

var gaJsHost = ((“https:” == document.location.protocol) ? “https://ssl.&#8221; : “http://www.&#8221;);document.write(unescape(“%3Cscript src='” + gaJsHost + “google-analytics.com/ga.js’ type=’text/javascript’%3E%3C/script%3E”)); try {var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker(“UA-7226372-1”);pageTracker._trackPageview();} catch(err) {} Hi,

I note one of UKIP’s resident pornographers postings are still given credence by UKIP Liverpool at:
http://ukipliverpool.org/node/52

But indubitably what puzzles me more, besides the fact that wee Willy Dartmouth had neither a spoilt brat tantrum nor denied his investment holdings with his chum Hanson (both using money their Fathers bequeathed them and I note seemingly Hanson has bought a young Russian though I understand Murdoch’s ex does not fall into that catagory despite the dowry!)

Indeed it seems Dartmouth’s only effort was to advertise for a personal spin Doctor on a salary of about £80K, as I recall, in The Guardian – One must assume Baron von Lottsov considers he is already adequately rewarded for his full time occupation shovelling ordure for the enrichment of the corrupt with the predictability of Gawain Croucher Skeptyk and the balance of the pond life that is in support of UKIP leadership, and their un Patriotic attacks and racist, xenophobic, anti Jewish anti homosexual behaviour as supporters of The EFD!

The news item I find most puzzling of the last few days is:

Former Southampton UKIP chairman Ryam Newell faces sex charges

Pic. c/o The Daily Echo

A FORMER Southampton UK Independence Party chairman faces a trial over the alleged sexual abuse of a schoolgirl and another woman.

Ryan Newell, 29, is accused of sexually activity with a child and sexual assault of a woman, the Daily Echo can reveal.
Hampshire police have charged him with five counts of sexually touching a girl aged between 13 and 15 and one of sexually touching a woman over 16.
He denies all the charges which relate to the period between March 2008 and April 2010 and now faces a trial next year at Southampton Crown Court.
Mr Newell, formerly of Honeysuckle Road, Southampton, worked as a manager at British Gas in St Mary’s Road.
He rose through the ranks of UKIP from a branch officer to chairman of the Southampton party.
He was a leading critic against plans for a gypsy and traveller transit site in Swaythling three years ago and of the Liberal Democrat administration running the city at the time. Mr Newell was later ousted from the local party. A UKIP spokesman said he was not a party member when the alleged offences came to light.
Mr Newell moved to Southampton nearly ten years ago when an amateur boxing career was cut short.
He has since moved back to Maidstone, Kent, where he grew up.
Alan Kebbell, current chairman of Southampton UKIP, said: “While I accept that members of all parties may be prone to the occasional lapse, the alleged offence is not one that would ever be condoned, or any mitigation accepted, by the party or me.
“The result was that his membership renewal from 2007 was never made and he is currently banned from reapplying.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE

It is not the obvious aspect that I find strange, as any political party is prone to sexual perverts and the immature overly active phillanderers without morality or ethics – as with UKIP or the 3 Political Parties. Whether ‘Porking’ the hired hands as we know Nuttall, Towler, Bloom, Farage are alleged to do as they all swop bicycles to keep fit, or whoring in the nightclubs and bordellos as we know several do or saving money buy defaulting on payment as Bloom is known to do – ever the cheap skate but to get arrested for intercourse with a black whore on the bonnet of a car in the street and then claim ‘Diplomatic Immunity’ because you are a UKIP MEP was surely not in the brief which you clearly misread as ‘Fighting The Next Erection’ jargon no doubt from your experiences with sex slaves in Hong Kong forced into prostitution by their poverty – There is NO ROMANCE in the world of Suzie Wong!

What surprises me in this instance is that Mr. Newell was removed from  his post as Chairman of Southampton Branch of UKIP in 2006 0r 2007 and he was debarred from membership renewall in 2007 – yet he was not charged until this month!

Minded that Nigel Farage took no consequential action against Tom Wise, in fact permitting him to manage his own EU allowances and never making ANY move to withdraw his membership of UKIP – in fact Trevor Colman went so far as to permit the NEC to issue a statement that he believed to be a pack of lies to cover-up Tom Wise and Lindsay Jenkins’ apparent fraud and Tom Wise’s embezzlement:
see the signed documentary proof CLICK HERE as used in evidence thereof until the realisation that the documentary proof on his computer had him ‘banged to rights’ and Tom Wise changed his plea leading to the release of Jenkins, although most clearly guilty of signing the instruments of the fraud. As of course the documents showed!

That Douglas Denny had duplicitously engaged to prevent a disciplinary hearing seemingly because he believed Tom Wise should not be allowed nor would be able to clear his name and exhonourate UKIP in collusion in the crime CLICK HERE & also HERE which shows just what a vile creature of the under belly of life Douglas Denny is in reality – note how dishonest he was in his attempts to prevent the efforts of Niall Warry to clean up UKIP!

You will find most of the facts you may wish to ascertain about UKIP can be found by use of the Right SideBar LINKS and/or the >SEARCH< facility at the top of the Bar.

However it fails to explain why Ryam Newell was dumped from the Chairmanship AND The Party in 2007. In fact few of the dates tally in the report, whether deliberate obfuscation or journalistic incompetence is hard to tell, did UKIP KNOW of this young man depravity – did UKIP make their fears/belief or knowledge known to the authorities at the time or did they fail those who were his victims in 2008 to 2010 by failing to acquit their duty and register misprission just as Trevor Colman did when he failed to report Tom Wise’s criminality – can we expect the current Chairman to also shortly become an MEP filling ‘Dead Mens Shoes’ as Trevor Colman did?

Clearly UKIP is ill placed to pretend they might have acted honourably based upon their track record as the dishonesty of the leadership would seem to be its only consistency!
To protest would be farcical as this shows, since corruption has been an integral part of UKIP’s behaviour since inception it seems:

Such corruption is a norm for UKIP as with Tom Wise spending £8,000 of tax payers’ stolen money to fund solicitors to seek to stop me telling the truth, or the efforts of UKIP fronted by Mark Croucher and aided by Paul Nuttall as Chairman and his chum Clive Page in Court which was tossed out and we still await payments of my £12.5K costs details of which they were ordered to pay can be seen CLICK HERE.

Just as their corruption can be seen to be endemic by the Guilty Verdict awarded by The Courts and upheld by The Supreme Court against UKIP in accepting unlawfull payments from both Dick Horsnell and also from Alan Bown who had removed himself from the electoral role, despite remaining in Britain – Unlawfull in its own right I believe!

Then again one may note the involvement of David Bannerman in fraud as openly boasted of and confirmed to be aware it was unlawfull by his partner in crime Stuart Agnew – as Agnew set out on video tape to conspire with Lord Pearson in the criminal act of Money Laundering to obfuscate donations to the Electoral Commission by the dishonest laundering through Pearson’s Company Global Britain which he clearly states, as does Farage, has been used for this identical criminality before!

I understand no further action will be taken over the criminal money laundering – no doubt because a Peer was involved and in the light of his services to the Tory Party by betraying UKIP members at the General Election I presume this is his ‘Payolla’.

However the direct fraud against the tax payers by David Bannerman and Stuart Agnew is still a matter under investigation as using stolen money to fund political staff who do no work for you is just as criminal for Agnew & Bannerman as it is for Derek Clark who is still under investigation and is almost exactly the same crime – ie drawing tax payer’s money fraudulently and then spending it on personal gain – Just as Tom Wise did to garner a 2 year prison sentence.

Minded of the decrepitude of Derek Clark and his advanced years if they do not call the investigation together and put it to trial in his case there is every possibility he will die in prison as clearly he will not deserve the compassion extended to the entirely innocent Magrahi – and already we have the precedent of Tom Wise and it would clearly be unjust that a similar sentence were not handed down for so similar a crime.

As for endemic corruption do not forget that when it was known that Piers Merchant was in the terminal stages of cancer (I knew being a veggie didn’t help) Mark Croucher and Douglas Denny pounced and tried to portray him first as Junius and then realising their folly repainting the evidence to claim he was a witting and deliberate supplier of information to Junius.

No doubt an obscene vengeance for his having the timerity to speak out and tell the truth about the corruption that put David Bannerman, Stuart Agnew, Martha Andreasen, Paul Nuttall both in seat and liars like McTrough, Farage, Andrew Smith, Gulleyslime, Curtis, Reeve and others in positions for details CLICK HERE

~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
 
 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate) .
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01291 – 62 65 62
Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in Andrew SMITH, Annabell FULLER, David Bannerman, Farage, Julia LANGMAID, LEADERSHIP, Lindsay JENKINS, Lord Pearson, Mark CROUCHER, Paul Nuttall, Peter REEVE, Ryam Newell, Stuart AGNEW, Tom WISE | Leave a Comment »

#0129* – UKIP + EFD = Fully Funded EUthenasia for UKIP. EUkip REBORN!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 27/09/2010

#0129* – UKIP + EFD = Fully Funded EUthenasia for UKIP. EUkip REBORN!
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

UKIP + EFD = Fully Funded EUthenasia for UKIP. 

EUkip REBORN!

EVEN SPEECHES IN FAVOUR IN BERLIN CLICK HERE!

Hi,

Recently you will have seen cautionary information regarding UKIP being duped regarding Pan EU Political Parties and selling out their principles and Steve Allison whom this blog cautioned against as Farage’s man in disguise re. the NEC Election as with Mick McTrough, Elizabeth Burton and others whose presence on the NEC as puppets and muppets brings UKIP into disrepute.

We also cautioned regarding Steve Allison as inappropriate as Campaign Manager for Tim Congdon’s leadership bid.

Older, Wiser, Sadder

General
Offline
Position in UKIP: NEC member 2010 – 2013
UKIP Branch: Sedgefield
Full Name: Steve Allison
Posts: 252

How very apposite – I wonder howmany other people will be Older, Wiser & Sadder having permitted people like McTrough, Duffy, Denny, Allison, Williams, Curtis, Clark, Burton, Batten, Smith, Croucher, Wood (Malcol), Andreasen seize control to ensure it remains the Farage Fan Club at the cost of UKIP Principles, values, manners and ethics.


For those who wish to know the facts and avoid the spin you may care to commence, before reading on, to CLICK HERE or CLICK HERE and HERE and also HERE 

I am heavily reliant for quotes below on Wikipedia which I show in Green, for Barbara Booker aka Barboo which I show in blue, any comments by UKIP members I show in purple – I hope this makes the post easier to follow.

In consideration of UKIP forming a Pan EU Political Party as The EFD or similar – which, particularly in the light of Derek Clark’s betrayal of Britain and Andreasen’s disinterest in Britain working for Spain and herself and Farage’s speech in Berlin at the Reinbeckhalle on Saturday (for details CLICK HERE).
With comprehensive details and text + Pictures CLICK HERE

So let us consider the difficulties which for starters include the concept that to gain back Tax Payers’ money from The EU any elected Party MUST decide to form a Pan EU Political Party – Thus not just strengthening The very enemy they seek to dismantle but in democratic terms fore-swearing their rights of free speech and self determination as they MUST – having first jumped through the malign EU Hoop next accept INSTRUCTION on how they may spend the money!

Controversy

Europarty funding goes to Europarties and stays with Europarties: the funding cannot be used for the funding of other political parties and in particular national political parties.[8] National political parties disinclined from joining Europarties are thereby disadvantaged.[18] 25 Members of the European Parliament petitioned the European Court of Justice, arguing that this contravened the EU’s stated values of pluralism and democracy. The case was rejected after eighteen months.[19][20] A closely related case fought by the French Front National, the Italian Lega Nord, and the Belgian Vlaams Blok (now Vlaams Belang) was appealed[21] and rejected.[22]

Clearly there are many reasons to fore-swear the malign diktat of the central dictator committee’s bribes – that they are bribes would of course be reason enough to the principled and reject the entire concept for honourable men and women, but they are bribes and we are talking about self serving politicians!

Regulations

As of 1 November 2008, the regulation governing Europarties is Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003,[8] as later amended[9] under codecision (see above). According to that regulation’s European Commission factsheet,[10] for a party to become a Europarty it must meet the following criteria:
  • it must have legal personality in the Member State in which its seat is located.
  • it must observe the founding principles of the European Union, namely the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law.
  • it must have participated, or intend to participate, in elections to the European Parliament.
  • it must have in at least one quarter of the Member States, one or both of the following:
  • either it must have received at least 3% of the votes cast in each of those Member States at the most recent European Parliament elections.
  • or it must already be represented by Members, whether Members of the European Parliament for those states, or Members of the national Parliaments of those states, or Members of the regional Parliaments of those states, or Members of the regional Assemblies of those states.
  • it must publish its revenue and expenditure annually.
  • it must publish a statement of its assets and liabilities annually.
  • it must provide a list of its donors and their donations exceeding €500.
  • it must not accept anonymous donations.
  • it must not accept donations exceeding €12,000 per year and per donor.
  • it must not accept donations from the budgets of political groups of the European Parliament.
  • it must not accept more than 40% of a national political party’s annual budget.
  • it must not accept donations from any company over which the public authorities may exercise a dominant influence, either by virtue of their ownership of it, or by their financial participation therein.
  • it must get at least 25% of its budget from sources other than its European Union funding.
  • it must submit its application by the 15 November before the financial year that it wants funding for.

All that boils down in real terms to – YOU WILL comply with OUR TERMS that we have decided to IMPOSE and if you decline:

Firstly you will miss out on a relatively unaccountable free handout of other peoples’ money for YOU to feather YOUR nest and in so doing strengthen the corrupt aims of The Malign and malevolent EU.

Secondly if you do NOT do as we tell you we will imply that you opposed these basic terms:

it must observe the founding principles of the European Union, namely the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law.

Right lets look at this cleverly worded blackmail by The EU!
The EU dishonestly claims:

it observe the founding principles of the European Union,

It does NOT they are merely flowery words that The EU completely ignores!

namely the principles of liberty,

Even Prisons offer periods of Free Association – there are no fundamental Freedoms on offer in this EU Political Prison – The Gulag is set up to ensure The State functions as a supra National Empirate enforced upon the largely opposed people – due to standards of education and a propaganda budget of £2.4Billion stolen from the prisoners annually – the balance of the population are so ignorant they have no understanding of the evil being done to them or they are on the Political Gravy Train enjoying the bribe culture and are bought and paid for.

democracy,

The EU pretends it has a Democratic deficit when in fact it has made it abundantly clear it has absolutely no knowledge or understanding of the basic tenets of democracy!

respect for human rights

This of course is a bare faced lie as even The United Nations, for which I have almost as little respect as I have for The EU or the rest of the New World, Globalist dissorder being managed to control through chaos – The UN clearly states in its Foundation Charter that a fundamental human right is the right of self determination.

There is absolutely no right of Self Determination in The EU where as you know The French, The Dutch & The Irish ALL voted and rejected membership of The EU and engagement with the New Constitution Lisbon Treaty to the horror of the Dictator Committee of apparatchicks and their vassals – such that they blocked other Countries having the opportunity of Self Determination and lied to achieve their corrupt outcome.

They have no respect for Human Rights – one need only study the new codex of law ‘Corpus Juris’ based upon the laws of The Emperor Justinius with an overlay of code Napoleon to produce a ‘better fairer system of REPRESSION’ I quote ‘CORPUS JURIS – Mireille Delmas-Marty EU Publication for DrG Finance ISBN 2-7178-3344-7 end of para 3 page 40

and fundamental freedoms,

What fundamental Freedoms do we enjoy that we did not enjoy or more to the point wished for as British citizens that are in some way granted that were precluded under British law had we wished for them and enjoyed our fundamental human right of SELF DETERMINATION.

and the rule of law.

The EU has no legitimate Laws as it has enacted a huge series of diktats and due to the total lack of democratic input and the fact that only a minority are in favour of membership they have no validity.

Further when edward Heath negotiated and led these United Kingdoms backwards into this arcane concept he has admitted both on TV in an interview with David Frost and subsequently repeated on the floor of The House of Commons and thus on record in Hansard that he and his Cabinet deliberately lied to Parliament and the peoples and also it seems The Monarch when he stated that ‘This will lead to no essential loss of Sovereignty’ – he has confirmed that he lied because he believed that the people would vote NO in the referendum if they knew the truth.

Many people believe the people voted NO anyway, despite his criminal deception and thus at the time TREASON. Many believe it was by lumping of Constituencies to fudge a result!

Under UK Law at the time which was upheld by The Treaty of Vienna on International Treaties it clearly states that should one party mislead another to obtain their agreement, acquiescence or compliance to a contract or agreement said contract or agreement shall be deemed null and void.

Thus Ipso Facto Britain’s signature to The Treaty of Rome is by any stretch of the imagination NULL & VOID.

Thus since every single EU encroachment since that unlawfull document is merely an ammendment founded upon the pre supposition that the foundation document was sound there is no stronger argument against Britain’s membership of the centralised alien and malign committee dictatorship of The EU than the simple fact that there is prima facie evidence that our entire participation is Ultra Vires.

WE ARE NOT LEGALLY MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Now consider the excellent fisking of Steve Allison’s confused statement lifted earlier from The UKIP members’ forum – the site where those too timerous to discuss their views and promote and defend them crano rectally retentatively navel gaze from the inside! An incestuous and heavily moderated site for those of little political nouse and less competence to impress eachother in a vacuum!

Steve Allison on pan-EU parties

Junius has posted comments said to have been made by Steve Allison on the UKIP members’ forum, following an NEC meeting at which a presentation on forming a pan-European party to access additional EU funding was discussed.

The Euro-sceptic Parties, like UKIP, tend to shy away from forming organisations that are seen as taking them deeper into the system. As illustrated by the almost frenzied rush by some sections of UKIP to ensure our party is not contaminated by receipt of such money! This means Euro-sceptic groups don’t access the funding that is available and leave the field clear for the pro-EU organisations to grab all the cash.

UKIP Members seem to fixate on the requirement that to draw down such funds the party must “observe the founding principles of the European Union”.

However, those ‘founding principles’ are the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law.

Which of those principles does UKIP Object to? Obviously we have a different interpretation of them from other parties and nations, and we understand and practise them in a very different way from Continental Europeans. But we, as a party do support these principles. There is no requirement for example to support any other aims of the EU, there is no requirement to support political union or greater integration. The irony is that UKIP could take EU Money and use it to fight political union and further integration in the name of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law.

So it’s not that such funding isn’t available to Euro sceptic groups. It is just that such groups chose to not access the funding due to some mistaken idea of ideological purity.

The phrase “Cutting off one’s own nose to spite one’s face” comes to mind here.

Paid by whom and with what?
One of the carrots of accepting membership of a pan-European political party would be funding for a “think tank” to develop policy. This would probably be based in the UK with a big slice of 1,300,000 Euro Budget. This money could be used to research positions, produce policies, print and distribute booklets, etc. It could also be used to fund conferences and meetings. Yes I know its a buy off (or a sell out?) but its a lot of money that UKIP could use to fight the EU with.

I rather like the irony of using the EU’s money to fight against it. At least we’d be getting some of our own money back.

If you think about it UKIP does only exist because of the EU! At the risk of breaking NEC Confidentiality I will say there was extensive discussion about this at the NEC and a lot more information is still outstanding. I went into the meeting pre-disposed to fight the “Pan European Party” to my last breath, but I listened to the presentation, I asked questions and received answers and I agreed at NEC that the party should investigate the outstanding issues and the NEC receive another report.

The proposal was then to present this report at a special meeting open to all UKIP Members in London on October 9th. The morning session could have been an official Leadership Hustings and an afternoon session on the pan European party proposal. This would have allowed three or even four hours of informed discussion rather than just the very brief debate and prepared speeches to the motion at conference.

Unfortunately I understand the amendment to the motion was defeated and so the Special General Meeting will now not take place. I think this is a real shame as it would have allowed informed decision making and not knee jerk responses

I have not agreed to the proposal but what I have said is that it doesn’t need to be rejected out of hand without some really serious consideration. There is some serious money on the table and UKIP needs every penny it can get. The key question I asked, and received assurances to, was that being in such a party would in no way mean the end of UKIP, we would still be UKIP and would continue to campaign and stand in elections as UKIP.

The whole thing is by no means a done deal but there are some very attractive carrots on offer and I for one find the irony very attractive in taking EU Money to spend fighting the EU.

Assuming the comments are genuine and accurately reported, they are worth considering in detail as the subject is fundamental to UKIP’s future. The essential points made by Steve Allison are:
quote (Steve Allison)

UKIP Members seem to fixate on the requirement that to draw down such funds the party must “observe the founding principles of the European Union”. However, those ‘founding principles’ are the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law. Which of those principles does UKIP Object to? . . . . we, as a party do support these principles. There is no requirement for example to support any other aims of the EU, there is no requirement to support political union or greater integration.

unquote
Steve Allison would appear to be remarkably poorly informed here. If UKIP members are indeed fixated as he suggests it is because they have heard their MEPs, particularly Nigel Farage, say over and again that the party rejects the state funding of pan-EU political parties precisely because qualification requirements conflict with UKIP aims and principles. Is SA not aware that in 2004 MEPs Farage, Titford and Booth even took the European parliament and Council of Ministers to the European Court in an attempt to kill off the funding legislation? You can’t spend years saying something is dangerous and unacceptable, then suddenly present it as an attractive carrot and expect to carry the membership with you. See the following:

Press release from Jeffrey Titford MEP, 26.7.00:
The European Union plans to fund only those parties which “support the principle of European integration“.

UKIP and EDD press release 18.2.03: The European proposals would require parties in receipt of funding to accept both the primacy of European Union law, and the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights. Jeffrey Titford said,
It can hardly be considered democratic to require parties to accept a certain political position, in this case acceptance of the supremacy of the European Union and its bodies, in order to secure funding“.

Daily Telegraph 20.2.03:
Mr Farage said he was proud to be disqualified from receiving such funding. “I most certainly don’t respect the primacy of EU law and I think the charter (of Fundamental Rights) is downright dangerous

Nigel Farage to CIB Liberty News, Spring 2003:
in order for a political party to be registered it must ensure that the statute and activities of the European political party respect the basic purposes of the Union with regard to freedom, democracy, human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law“.

This immediately presents difficulties for parties that disagree with the objectives of the European Union . . . the UK Independence Party would immediately fall foul of the Commission because one of its aims is British withdrawal from the Union. It also disagrees with the principles of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and does not recognise the supremacy of EU laws over those of Great Britain, making it a complete non-starter under the new rules!

Europarl verbatim report of proceedings 18.6.03, Statute and financing of European political parties:
Booth (EDD) – Two recent opinion polls in the UK gave figures of 92% and 96% as wanting to leave the European Union, and yet this proposal would deny funding to any party who should dare to represent the views of that very large proportion of its citizens“.

BBC Radio 4 ‘World at One’ 27.6.03: Nigel Farage is an MEP for the UK Independence Party. As a member of a party who wouldn’t receive any of the new money he’s furious about the proposals: (Farage)
If you support the political union, if you support the European project you’ll get money, if you don’t you won’t get money“.

UKIP press release, 28.1.04 ‘UKIP MEPs take Euro Parliament to court over state funding of parties’ – UK Independence Party MEP Nigel Farage said,
We are opposed on principle to the idea of state funding of political parties, either nationally or at a European level. It is not an appropriate use of tax-payers money. As if that was not bad enough, the legislation adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers will discriminate against certain political parties. It requires the recipients of European funding to subscribe to pre-set political ideals, such as agreement with greater European integration“.

Europarl verbatim report of proceedings 8.3.04, Statute and financing of political parties at European level:
Farage (EDD) I do not think there is any evidence that suggests that the voters in my country or in any other country are happy for their money directly to finance political parties at a European level. I have also felt, ever since Nice and Article 191, that this idea that you qualify if you conform to the democratic principles of the Union is potentially a dangerous one. I have some difficulty with the issue of the rule of law. It seems to me that, post-Constitution, some in this place – and I am one of them – will not recognise that new rule of law because we will only be able to leave the EU on terms of the EU“.

UKIP Letter from Strasbourg 22.11.05:
Pan EU Political Parties. Within the Independence and Democracy Group, two parties have emerged. However, UKIP joined neither of them, because there are no other moderate parties in the parliament that want to leave the EU and also, because UKIP disapproves of state funding for parties, which is to be made available to these new combinations“.

UKIP press release 3.2.06:
Snouts deeper in the trough – the European Parliament’s Budgetary Control Committee last night rubber-stamped a massive 19% hike in taxpayers’ money to be gifted to ‘European Political Parties’. Tom Wise MEP (UKIP) denounced the decision. The concept of European Political parties is itself a travesty designed mainly to raise more cash for pro-European political forces. To qualify, parties represented in the European Parliament from at least 7 different countries have to subscribe to a single political platform. This naturally discriminates against those parties that believe in national self-determination“.

* * *
A question that could be put to Nigel Farage at the leadership hustings is, were he and UKIP’s other MEPs lying over that five year period when they kept saying UKIP would be denied funding because of its stance on EU integration, or did they just not understand the funding criteria? And whichever it was, how are members to know they’re not lying / misunderstanding now in their presentation to the NEC?
* * *
quote (Steve Allison)

One of the carrots of accepting membership of a pan-European political party would be funding for a “think tank” to develop policy. This would probably be based in the UK with a big slice of 1,300,000 Euro Budget. This money could be used to research positions, produce policies, print and distribute booklets, etc. It could also be used to fund conferences and meetings. Yes I know its a buy off (or a sell out?) but its a lot of money that UKIP could use to fight the EU with.

unquote
No, UKIP most definitely could not use the money to fight the EU! The regulations governing the funding of political parties at European level (pan-EU parties) and their associated political foundation ‘think tanks’ specifically rule out the money being used by national political parties. To form a pan-EU party UKIP would have to agree a common political programme with parties from six other member states, and the funds could only be used to further objectives set out in that programme. ‘Withdrawal’ would not feature in it since no other EFD members want to leave the EU, and the research, policies, booklets, meetings, conferences, etc, would all have to promote the new party’s aims of ‘improving’ the EU.
quote (Steve Allison)

The key question I asked, and received assurances to, was that being in such a party would in no way mean the end of UKIP, we would still be UKIP and would continue to campaign and stand in elections as UKIP.

unquote
This is only partially true. Legislation currently being steered through the EP’s Constitutional Affairs Committee (AFCO) by the LibDem MEP Andrew Duff includes a draft proposal for 25 seats at the 2014 Euro-elections to be contested by pan-European parties on an EU wide basis. If by then UKIP is in a pan-European party it will not be able to contest these seats as UKIP. Furthermore, although European Party funding cannot be used for campaigning by national parties the reverse does not apply, and UKIP funds can and no doubt will be used for the new European Party’s campaign. Obviously, 25 seats will be just the thin end of the wedge, and at future EU elections UKIP members can expect to see ever more of their party’s funds diverted into the election campaigns of EFD (or whatever they call themselves) MEPs.
Don’t say you haven’t been warned!

May I take the liberty of reitterating Barbara Booker’s excellent conclusion in my own name!

Don’t say you haven’t been warned!

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate)

to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in Barbara BOOKER, CONTRACT LAW, Douglas DENNY, EU Unlawfull, Lisa DUFFY, McGough, Pan EU Party, Peter REEVE, Steve Allison, Ted HEATH, TREATY LAW | Leave a Comment »

#0126* – Nikki SINCLAIRE & Mike NATTRASS @ EDP MEETING for The PETITION

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/09/2010

#0126* – Nikki SINCLAIRE & Mike NATTRASS @ EDP MEETING for The PETITION
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership, 
 their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
Nikki SINCLAIRE & Mike NATTRASS @ EDP MEETING for The PETITION!

& A STRANGE STORY OF BETRAYAL of UKIP by THEIR LEADERSHIP!!

Hi,

The Keynote Guests at The English Democrats’ AGM were on The Saturday John Gaunt of radio celeb status, an avowed and OUT EUrosceptic and James Pryor and Bridget Rowe were there to meet and greet old friends and new in promoting their EU Referendum Campaign – complimentary, as you can see if you CLICK HERE to the Key Note speakers on The Sunday who were Nikki Sinclaire & Mike Nattrass promoting THE Petition Campaign for A Referendum.

Here is Sinclaire’s blog entry just now:

Speaking at the English Democrats

 I along with fellow West Midlands MEP, Mike Nattrass was pleased to have the opportunity to speak at the English Democrat AGM in Nottingham today having had a very successful business breakfast meeting with their leadership team.
We spoke individually and then took questions about the European Union, being an MEP, and the Campaign for a Referendum. It was an enjoyable and interesting experience exchanging views and developing an understanding of each other’s perspective.
It is these cross party initiative that are so important if we are going to win the day. 
 
I look forward to further dialogue.
Ps.  I was quite surprised to learn during our breakfast meeting the overtures made by Malcolm Pearson towards an electoral pact during the general election.
Pearson supported by Steve Crowther and Peter Reeeve met with the English Democrat leadership, with the blessing of Nigel Farage
Constituencies where UKIP would not stand were agreed however, as with so much else Pearson undertakes, he reneged on this undertaking costing UKIP considerable support in the areas that they had agreed.

Local Council Byelections 16th Sept 2010

KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA Cremorne

Gerard Neil HARGREAVES (Conservative Party Candidate) 602
Mabel Ellen MCKEOWN (The Labour Party Candidate) 583
Peter KOSTA (Liberal Democrats) 180
Julia STEPHENSON (Green Party) 51
David Adam COBURN (UK Independence Party (UKIP)) 46

KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA Earls Court

Linda WADE (Liberal Democrats) 703
Malcolm David SPALDING (Conservative Party Candidate) 594
Joel Alexander Muir BISHOP (The Labour Party Candidate) 151
Elizabeth ARBUTHNOT (Independent) 49
Jack BOVILL (Independent) 29
Michael John ENRIGHT (Green Party) 26
Antony LITTLE (United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP)) 18

After 17 Years that is the best UKIP can do and all because no one trusts their leadership – the message is popular, the members still try but again and again they are let down by their leadership team!

Betrayed, lied to, robbed, cheated, conned and debased whether by MEPs copulating in the streets of Belgium, defrauding the tax payers, behaving like children in The Parliament, having temper tantrums, sending childish obscene Twitters, urinating in flower pots in hotels, defaulting on debts, outright lies, plotting AGAINST the members – Rationally one is surprised they do so well!!

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

&
Work With THE MIDNIGHT GROUP to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate)
to Reclaim YOUR Future 
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in Campaign for a Referendum, Electoral Pact, English Democrats, Malcolm Pearson, Mike Nattrass, Nikki SINCLAIRE, Peter REEVE, Robin Tilbrook, Steve Crowther, The Petition | Leave a Comment »

#0090* – PETITION IN FULL SWING – BITCHY BEHAVIOUR FROM UKIP LEADERSHIP

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 04/09/2010

#0090* – PETITION IN FULL SWING – BITCHY BEHAVIOUR FROM UKIP LEADERSHIP   
Clean EUkip up NOW  make UKIP electable!  
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership,   
their anti UKIP claque in POWER the NEC 
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name! 

PETITION IN FULL SWING –
BITCHY BEHAVIOUR FROM UKIP LEADERSHIP 
COMES AS NO SURPRISE 
THEY WILL SINK TO ANY DEPRAVITY 
TO KEEP STUFFING THEIR POCKETS!

Campaign website: http://www.haveyoursay.eu/

For more general data CLICK HERE

Hi,

You may have noticed that yesterday evening I featured rumours being spread by Parasites in UKIP that eventually surfaced through Nigel’s ‘chum’ on Mrs. Dale’s Diary – you may well remember that saccharine and sickly article in GQ that showed Farage as a complete light weight which is more well known than this latest offering!

Seems like such unrequited love must be fed the odd tit bit to buy its favours!

Revolted by the tought I just can’t see Nigel Farage as a Homosexual icon but he has featured in GQ – I asked some of my female friends and without exception they saw him as a homosexual icon each of them say ‘as they couldn’t imagine him being appealing to women’ – this MAY have some merit as he ensures their fidelity by ensuring they are unatractive to men , which I gather is common and is then predatory on the gullible and those shallow enough to put a value on his access to tax payers money – all rather makes sense when you put it that way.

Also do bear in mind it may explain why he can not form relationships except with people he controls and can disgard – people who put income above integrity.

It may also explain why he is so vicious when he is challenged – he is no alpha male he is bereft of all the talents of leadership and he is clearly not a man one can trust or respect on any level.

Yesterday evening (Thursday) I published this report:

Hi,

An interesting if not unexpected attack on Nikki Sinclaire has been reported to me from the NEC – as the slime on the NEC largely cheated or were dependent on a clearly corrupt election to achieve their status and no effort is likely to be spared in seeking to damage Nikki Sinclaire’s Petition out of embarrassment on the part of the really staggering level of filth that is UKIP’s leadership – I convey this information but I look forward to hearing details of the assault on Nikki by her fellow UKIP members.

Let us see what Nikki has to say and what the details of the claims against her are.

There is every reason to believe, based upon track records, that Sinclaire has NOT offended against any rules and EVERY reason to believe members of UKIP’s leadership, NEC & parasites are yet again telling lies – that has been their habitual behaviour to date.

Regards,
Greg_L-W.

From my phone calls during the day I have established that The West Midlands Police have absolutely no idea what I was talking about and were happy to confirm that no such complaint had been made, as also from The Met. I gather from a friend in the meeeeja, one of my TV friends checked with with OLAF as did a press contact and they disclaimed knowledge of any complaint.

I have absolutely no doubt that Farage will seek to ensure his fingerprints are nowhere near the instructions but do bear in mind Farage’s insecure tantram and attempt at bullying when Sinclaire decided to leave the revolting racist, anti Jewish and pro EU membership EFD Group which Farage chairs.

Sinclaire had negotiated an honourable withdrawal to UKIP’s advantage with the then Party Leader Lord Pearson – a measure of his leadership was when Farage completely ignored his undertakings and set his sewer rat Mark Croucher to see what dirt he could dig up on Sinclaire – Mark Croucher was, as ever, utterly incompetent and failed to provide anything of substance.

It does seem that although Pearson being a weak and venal man of no integrity, which will come as no surprise to those who know him – he is after all a placeman having achieved nothing himself in life from his placement by Daddy at Eton onwards – he is now all but broke and clearly glad of his expenses as a peer as Rannoch Estate he inheritted may be very valuable but even a small estate like that costs a great deal to maintain and it is not long before one is dependent on handouts from the State, The EU or some trust or another – as dependent as a junkie on benefits and methadone!

We note only recently Pearson was flipping properties and encashing on his London house, no doubt with liquidity in mind to stay afloat.

If Dan Hannan, Nigel Farage, Marc Glendenning as the more money motivated political prostitutes believe the new scam will be any better than previous ones to milk Pearson for cash I believe they are even more stupid than I thought.

I do understand that the aim is claimed NOT to be a rival or spoiling operation for Nikki Sinclaire’s efforts at a cross party petition to lobby Parliament – yes ours, what is left of it – to hold a debate towards an in out referendum for the British peoples.

The Petition kicked off on the Conference fringe meeting trail and did hugely well at the first on the list with UKIP where well over 10% of the people attending UKIP’s conference came along and many signed up.

This was all the more astonishing when you consider UKIP leader’s lunch was on at the same time and although UKIP doesn’t have anything looking remotely like a leader for years – some might say if ever! It was noted Malcolm Pearson failed to have the common courtesy to attend – most probably advised not to risk discovering just how much he had let the party down by his betrayal, weakness, incompetence and outright dishonesty. I would imagine he would have asked everyone he met until he heard the advice he wanted to hear!

I do however expect the loudest volume was his protective and much brighter wife and Bridget Rowe – not unkindly nick named Death Rowe in press circles I gather!

Back to The Petition and we find the faintly ridiculous and utterly dishonest Peter Reeve turned up to show off the size of his mouth and his brain – he was very very successful as he always seems to be.

Peter Reeve made some vitriolic public comments to show off how little was in his brain attacking Roger Knapman a past leader over The Maastrict Treaty and Roger was able very rapidly to sho that he really was as much of a fool as we have always held him to be.

Sad little Reeve never one to miss an opportunity rounded on Sinclaire as he had an obvious bloody nose from Knapman but dozey as Roger is he had made Reeve look incredibly stupid (Reeve no longer has need of a mirror!) – His ploy with Sinclaire was to belittle the Petition but we all know UKIP leadership is working for themselves and not to get Britain off their Gravy Train!

Reeve however, being more stupid than most made that VERY obvious and as a recovery position scrambled to what he thought was high ground again belittling the Petition as standing no chance as UKIP had launched its own – this gave Sinclaire a perfet opportunity to point out it was NOT a UKIP venture – had he not heard Pearson had left UKIP and Dan Hannan had never been a member – she was also able to point out, much to Reeve’s embarrassment, but he is too stupid to understand embarrassment for long! She made it clear that The Referendum pressure group was NOT a Petition was complimentary to what The Petition is aiming for, and to cap it informed Reeve and the audience that the Referendum Group had approached her to see how they could help and the previous day she had met with their Campaign Manager.

Reeve clearly has little brain input to work his mouth but that does not stop him stuffing his foot in his mouth with consumate ease again and again and again.

One has top wonder just why UKIP keeps employing these low lifes but I guess the MEPs employ them and like Elizabethan ladies kept a monket in tow for comparison so they were thought of as beautiful it seems UKIP MEPs hire idiots so that the MEPs might look intelligent.

The meeting played to a packed room and received a great deal of support and promises of continued support.

Since this is without exception the very first visible activity from UKIP that has been entered into with thought, a plan and honestly that is working towards leaving The EU rather than a favoured few stuffing their pockets.

Good luck top the petition despite UKIP leadership clearly seeking to damage this positive effort to oppose membership of the EU – something UKIP leadership only ever talks about and has a track record of abject failure – criminality and lies.

Not to mention their efforts to harass people who oppose the EU openly, oppose The BNP openly and seek to clean up UKIP as supporters of UKIP to TRY to make it electable when you consider after 17 years they only attract 3.1% of the vote of the electorate and out of 19,000 seats available for election at various levels they have less than 30 people elected in UKIP.

It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. So many decent people betrayed by the scum that has risen to the top – many corruptly and now criminally enriching themselves in the manner of other UKIP MEPs before them!

A WORD OF WARNING TO NIKKI SINCLAIRE:
There is no depravity to which Farage and the filth he has gathered around him will not sink to seek to protect their income stream.


Further just look at the line up on the EU Referendum group and other than the obvious political prostitutes out for personal gain who would YOU be brave enough to trust. I am in touch with them as they have contacted me seeking clear water but it will take some convincing to me that they are not merely on the make and the take for their own gain – at least 4 of them I would not trust in my home alone and the other two would need to prove themselves and on the face of it I have my doubts – so cut no deals, these are people who are largely without ethics, clearly without principles and who would renege on an undertaking on a whim.


We have all seen Malcolm Pearson lie through his teeth, seek to dishonestly publicly defame and then go on to betray every principle on which UKIP was supposedly founded and he had a good master to teach him in Farage.


One is judged by the company one keeps and just look at the pond life of UKIP leadership.

Perhaps YOU could list the achievement over many years on a high salary as a political prostitute that has been achieved by ANY of the 7 so far known to be in this new group – not one would you wisely trust with the petty cash from a whelk stall.

Unlike previous petitions by UKIP this petition has a proud public aim to be presented to Paliament when it has the legal minimum signatures to engender a House of Commons debate to strive towards a full fledged National public debate and a referendum on leaving The EU.


In the interim it is intended to deliver Votes cast/petitions signed every time we have another 25,000.

Unlike the last UKIP petition, which seemed to have been a scam, as it did not have legal paperwork, was funded directly to the tune of £250,000 by the tax payer and was NEVER CARRIED OUT, leaving many in the belief that David Lott, Nigel Farage, Mark Croucher and maybe others had possibly trousered the money for their personal gain.

This Petition has been funded personally by Nikki Sinclaire from her personal allowances.

The documentation has been checked.

This Petition is NOT a dishonest spoiler for someone else’s efforts.

Though it is early days 

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance

totally endorses this Petition and its aim to have a debate in Parliament and a Nationwide Referendum on IN or OUT of the EU.


September 3rd. The Toorak Hotel, Chestnut Avenue, opposite the conference centre.

To be held during conference lunch break. Approx 1.00 pm.

The campaign for a referendum on membership of the EU.

Speakers will included:

Nikki Sinclaire MEP

Roger Knapman, former UKIP leader.

& A Free buffet.

Campaign website: http://www.haveyoursay.eu/

For more general data CLICK HERE
They clearly chose the right day and venue as the Saturday is expected to attract 350 – 400 UKIsies with their stale platitudes and obvious loss of direction abandoning their core message for lack of leadership over many years as they have blown like dandelion seed in a tornado.

Since there are so few (IF ANY) individuals with any notable education I hardly want their views on it and their transport views are utterly irrelevant as are their pretences at fiduciary policies and even were Prof. Tim Congdon to be elected – which he will not be their economic theories would even then be as little use as flatulence in a huricane.

The aim is to leave the EU not ponse around being pretentious in the delusion but anyone other than a political numptie or a child has ANY interest in UKIP policies when they vote.

UKIP has NEVER understood politics as Steve Uncles made so clear in his little sketch!

Without exception UKIP has a leadership of political fools without one wit of understanding of the pragmatism of politics.

You do not drive a lumbering bulldozer at 5mph at an enemy that can scatter at 15mph – you use the technology and you use a laser lance to eviscerate.

 INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance
to
Reclaim YOUR Future 
 
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
(IF You Have No INDEPENDENT Leave-the-EU Alliance Candidate)
LEAVE-THE-EU  
to Reclaim YOUR Future   

GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in Farage, KNAPMAN, Nikki SINCLAIRE, PEARSON; Lord Pearson;, Peter REEVE, PETITION, Roger Knapman, SINCLAIRE | Leave a Comment »