Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
#0059* – UKIP ETHICAL POLITICS & THE SUPREME COURT
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 03/08/2010
#0059* – UKIP ETHICAL POLITICS & THE SUPREME COURT
Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
UKIP – ETHICAL POLITICS & THE SUPREME COURT
As UKIP AIDS The EU OVERTHROW BRITISH JUSTICE!
Hi,
it would seem there is absolutely nothing that UKIP can do ethically and even worse – not content with failing to move UKIP one inch closer to the exit from the EU under Nigel Farage’s leadership they have formed their own Pan EU Political Party EFD grouping which gathers together some of the most unpleasant and overt racists, anti Jewish, holocaust deniers, Nazi supporters and sexually intollerant criminal abusers in EU politics who want to support membership of The EU.
They then put Nigel Farage in the chair and we are told they are in the group for the money.
I understand the black prostitute who escorted Godfrey Bloom to a cash point was in it for the money, but that seems not to have crossed his mind when he tried to run off without paying! For more details CLICK HERE
Hypocracy is a main theme in UKIP – that is clear though for the life of me I find it hard to differentiate between hypocracy and outright dishonesty!
Many will remember that I backed Nigel Farage in all aspects and openly stated that as a supporter of many years standing I would continue to back him for as long as he never stood for leadership, in which case I would relentlessly oppose him – it was clear to me that Nigel Farage lacked the OQ, the integrity, the probity, the gravitas and any leadership skills – it is now clear to anyone but a fool that I was right!
Openly he forms vile groups and is like a badly behaved child an endless embarrassment yet for The Party keeping this performing monkey in the lime light has proved catastrophic as clearly the higher up the tree the monkey climbs the more you see its Rs.
The entire debacle with the Electoral Commission was ABSOLUTELY in line with my predictions – he has gathered around him such a claque of low grad trash as his NEC and MEPs that there is absolutely no one of caliber who can recognise the dangers and pitfalls whilst inflating bulldozers, dressing up as chickens, standing in APCs on trailers and pretending they are tanks, rushing around in a 1950s scout car out of a meuseum, standing in puddles on building sites, and endlessly making foolish insults just don’t hack it for a political party but do much for Farage’s personal promotion.
Having deliberately forced a confrontation with the Electoral Commission in the Courts, that was completely avoidable, and having risked the entire future of UKIP – we now find they were utterly dependent on the irrefutable fact that Charles Dickens was spot on when he gave Mr. Bumble when he said:
I QUOTE:
UKIP would repeal the Human Rights Act 1998 and withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In future the British courts would not be allowed to appeal to any international treaty or convention to override or set aside the provisions of any statue passed by Parliament.
Some interesting comments from one of the legal blogs:
Lord Phillips also dealt very briefly (and almost in passing) with the Appellant’s subsidiary contention on the basis of Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights, and agreed that total forfeiture should not be ordered in circumstances where it was a disproportionate sanction, as this would breach the Convention. The strongest dissent on this point was from Lord Brown, who was “at a loss to see” how forfeiture of a donation which by definition the party should not have accepted or kept could violate its human rights. Even if it could, “the court always has the option – and on that hypothesis would be bound – to make no forfeiture order at all.” But again this leaves the circumstances in which a court would not make an order at all very shadowy, and would provide a court with no guidance as to when the exercise the discretion undoubtedly contained in the word “may”.
To view the original of this article which so clearly highlights UKIP’s unarguable hypocricy CLICK HERE
UKIP’s hypocracy is unacceptable, sordid, underhand and shamefull – sheltering behind the skirts of The EU from British Justice – evenignoring the ruling of the British appeal Courts who stated there were no legal or ethical grounds under British Law to appeal to The House of Lords – so what does UKIP under Farage do, and I always said he lacked both honour and OQ, but they dash off to seek to shelter behind the EU’ Human Rights Laws they had expressly stated they would ban as a part of their Manifesto PLEDGE.
Further they were all too willing to pour salt in the wound of our Justice system and raise two fingers to Britain’s appeal Courts and the House of Lords as they strutted off to lend greater legitimacy to The EUropean Union’s corruption of British Justice by surplanting it with an EU Regional Supreme Court to be compliant with the rest of The EU and to inexorably and inevitably advance the demise of Justice in these United Kingdoms and our legal system founded on Natural Law and presumptions of innocence in trial before a Jury of one’s peers under Habeas Corpus and the principles of No Double Jeopardy and the concept that Justice Delayed is Justice Denied.
Farage’s UKIP has much aided, for their own squalid gain, the advance of the imposition of the Justinian codex of Law of Corpus Juris with its overlay of Code Napoleon – another step towards the destruction of the values of these United Kingdoms and the concepts and belief in Justice – a most execution by Farage & UKIP for their own gain!
A measure of the assistance Farage’s UKIP has given The EU by their total and shamefull abrogation of honour and duty as they defined for themselves in their own manifesto is shown in this legal comment:
Increasingly muscular Supreme Court good for human rights
The UK’s new Supreme Court has reached the end of its first term, leading to some interesting discussions about its future from both practical and philosophical perspectives. From a human rights angle, a well-tooled and robust Supreme Court which acts to keep the government in check is good for everyone.
For more details of The EU Regional Supreme Court Case CLICK HERE
As I have ALWAYS said, since my first involvement with UKIP some 14 years ago – I am a devoted backer of the principles and ethics of UKIP and would back Nigel Farage to the hilt as the party’s performing monkey but would oppose him totally if he ever stood for leader as he has absolutely no principles and is a mere barrow boy without attributes to lead – at the moment UKIP has no ethics and is without principles and just look at the filth and the scum it has gathered around it.
You can find a copy of the extremely dubious judgement of the supreme clowns:
CLICK HERE
and for the summary: CLICK HERE
and for The Electoral Commission’s Press Release CLICK HERE
We know that even in the days of the medieval foundations of law they had an understanding of it:
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
to Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Ukip-vs-EUkip 
We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse. No comment has EVER been barred or deleted which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual. You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner. We welcome genuine comments.