#953* – UKIP COULD LEARN FROM Nikki SINCLAIRE

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

UKIP COULD LEARN FROM Nikki SINCLAIRE ON MANY FRONTS!
Hi,

I was impressed with the very professional nature of the ‘wrap’ on her local constituency Newspaper that Sinclaire organised though I would venture that it may have broken a little early in her campaign but let us see – it launched her campaign well and if she can pull off another similar publicity coup late in the campaign it will serve her well.

She would seem to have made a wise move in espousing tomorrow’s politics by standing as an INDEPENDENT in Alliance with, in her case, The Residents’ Association.

As an INDEPENDENT she can represent the best interests of her electorate rather than the concept of serving a Party line which has so obscenely betrayed us as a people and in Sinclaire’s case where her Party obscenely betrayed her as a leading individual – where the Party leader set out even on TV to attack Sinclaire particularly and his entire team of MEPs as ‘uncredible’ whilst the titular leader whilst embroiled in a fraud against electoral law as exposed by The Sunday Times defined his entire leadership as Neanderthals (hard to disagree with Lord Pearson on that one!).

One has to wonder just how much cash Malcolm Pearson has laundered for his chum Henry Angust and others and whether his Company (unencorporated) Global Britain is legitimately engaged in acceptable behaviour or is it merely a shell organisation involved in what seems to be criminal money laundering!

I will try to bring you scans of the wrap Sinclaire had published by her local paper as I am sure scans will be available early in the week.

In the mean time this publicity can do her no harm.

Euro MP Nikki Sinclaire to stand for Meriden constituency

Other Meriden candidates are: 
Ed Williams (Labour), 
Simon Slater (Lib Dem),
Elly Stanton, 
and
Caroline Spelman (Con)

To view the original article CLICK HERE

A quick bit of research shows the incumbent Caroline Spelman to be hugely disadvantaged during this election as she would be expected to abandon the interests of her Constituents were she and the Tories elected – she is expected to be Transport Minister which would go completely contra the interests of her constituents as ‘Solihull & Meriden‘ is likely to suffer hugely and be cut in half by the proposed High Speed Rail Link. Spelman through collective responsibility of Cabinet would be forced to actively work against her constituents – this alone may well prove of value to Sinclaire’s campaign but probably the greatest boost to her campaign has been being so openly and tastelessly attacked and betrayed by UKIP.

That Nigel Farage acted in such a dishonourable way has further split the party he did so much to build and so very, very much to destroy – even demeaning the party in the media on TV mounting an underhand and unpleasant personalised attack also his damaging behaviour that has made him ever more the clown turn in the EU’s pretend Parliament.

Then the titular leader Lord Pearson showed himself up so very clearly as dishonourable when he reneged on his promises to Sinclaire and then showed himself as either completely out of touch with the party or worse still an outright liar with his letter to members attacking Sinclaire.

#952* – ‘STRAIGHT TALKING’ STOLEN FROM Roger HELMER – POSTER FROM Iain DALE!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

#951* – UKIP – Lord PEARSON, Andrew MARR & THE SCUM & DISHONESTY OF UKIP

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

UKIP – Lord PEARSON, Andrew MARR & THE SCUM & DISHONESTY OF UKIP & SUPPORTERS LIKE BUTCHER, DENNY, PARR & THOSE TOO ASHAMED TO PUT THEIR NAMES TO THEIR BEHAVIOUR!

Hi,

The Andrew Marr Show:
Former BBC Political Editor Andrew Marr shines a light on UKIP & Lord Pearson giving Malcolm Pearson a very generous easy ride.

Broadcast on:

BBC One, 9:00am Sunday 11th April 2010

Duration:

60 minutes

 

You can watch the show if you CLICK HERE

 

Available until:

9:59am Sunday 18th April 2010

Malcolm Lord Pearson of Rannoch gets 9 minutes, almost exactly commencing 30m24s. into the program.

Pearson was fortunate that Andrew Marr asked no difficult questions and almost led Pearson forward to give his best side (and that of UKIP) – It makes it rather clear that the BBC has an agenda as I can not for a moment accept that Andrew Marr is so woefully unaware that UKIP os in turmoil cosied up to the pro EU members of the EFD as they are to the outrageous racism, xenophobia and violence advocated and practiced by their political associates – many find it an obscenity that UKIP has cosied up to lead the EFD with its holocaust deniers, Nazi sympathisers and anti Jewish membership.

To fail to address these facts and to ignore the exposure of UKIP’s leader Nigel Farage, their titular leader Malcolm Pearson, their deputy leader David Bannerman, the other Eastern region MEP Stuart Agnew and the Risible Reeve are all embroilled in inquiries related to corruption, dishonesty and money laundering is a staggering abrogation of duty by a public service broadcaster in the run up to a General Election.

Perhaps today’s broadcast by Pearson shows that Farage’s days are over as UKIP’s performer as clearly Pearson ‘cuts more ice’ Pearson did not rely on slandering his colleagues, did not endlessly claim ‘I’, ‘I’, ‘I’ though I do note he failed to be inclusive of the party or its members! Pearson was also more plausible when presenting figures as he did not come across as a Coty Barrow Boy with all the answers but no time for the questions!

The great fault, beyond the undeniable corruption that is UKIP and the self serving self enrichment scams and structures that are UKIP os in the main just how thoroughly unpleasant UKIP leadership are.

We have seen the unpleasant behaviour of UKIP leadership with Farage attacking his own MEPs and describing them as uncredible – then we had Pearson describing UKIP senior members as Neanderthals – he even described the self proclaimed crook Stuart Agnew as reliable and sound or some such twaddle – the man is a liar, a cheat, a crook and a self serving bully, without morality or honour!

Then we have the efforts on behalf of UKIP to silence free speech using low lifes like Mark Croucher to lie and dissemble about those who may have alternative opinions, released to try to frame a dying man Piers Merchant, a supporter of the anti democratic Searchlight with its criminally convicted leader and its unpleasant anti democratic associates like UAF, ANaL and other similar bully boy blagards yet UKIP leadership are so bereft of morality and standards that having deliberately cheated and lied in their MEP selection processes as shown in their own Official Report by their own internally appointed Returning Officer CLICK HERE.

We see the dishonesty and lies of people like Douglas Denny, the clear dishonesty of Marta Andreasen as shown by the Court verdict against her that showed her to be no whistle blower merely a dishonest and incompetent book keeper CLICK HERE Her interview with Tim Sebastian shows us just how duplicitous she is if you CLICK HERE or HERE – little of the truth seems to feature in her new novel!

Then we have others like Stuart Parr details of his dishonest and underhand behaviour can be found at CLICK HERE or HERE there is no shortage of examples of Stuart Parr’s dishonesty and lies – however to be fair he does use his name but as he places no value on integrity or honourable behaviour I guess he cares not that people link his lies and character to his name.

There are those like Skeptyk who vehemently denies being Croucher which I accept as I believe it is a composite of low lifes liars and cheats for provenance of their dishonesty and serial duplicity CLICK HERE

Then there are others similarly too ashamed to put their names to their unpleasant behaviour – a small example can be seen if you CLICK HERE, which does show just how extreme are the efforts to suppress the truth and free speech as with the ill informed anonymouce idiocy of comments like this: CLICK HERE

Let us look at that example where Tim & Junius are falsely accused of witholding information – this is all too usual in its untruthfull spin.

Check the time lines and you will note that I tracked down the details of John Stevens and posted a blog on the fact that he was standing in Buckingham against John Bercow and the only vid. I could find on him had, with some humour, exposed Farage to a small extent. I had a lengthy conversation with John Stevens political agent, having read his web site see the blog CLICK HERE

You will note neither Junius, who I subsequently brought the details AS I KNEW THEM to their attention – you will note neither I nor Junius advocated anyone vote for John Stevens – we merely flagged up the fact he was standing which clearly UKIP had NOT publicised.

No doubt we will revisit John Stevens in the days to come – I am aware he is ex Banking, which immediately shows him to be suspect as he was a Tory MEP until 1999 and was very pro EU and joining with the EUro, which indicates a clearly un Patriotic stance. Since 2001 I gather he has had association with the Lib.Dims. who are VERY pro surrender of our liberty to vassal status in the EU.

However to be fair, this leaves me with a dilemma, John Stevens would seem to be very pro EU yet no longer draws his income from the EU (bears investigation), he does seem to have the edge on Farage in various areas – he made a success of his career in The City and on a cursory look I can find no reason to doubt his integrity even if I totally repudiate his conclusions regarding the EU. However there is a clear chink in the apparent position John Stevens holds as I have known his Political Agent for best part of a dozen yearsand I know he is fundamentally opposed and openly stated as against Britain participating in the EU as a vassal state.

The dilemma is does one support an individual who MAY BE pro EU or does on support a man without morality, integrity, loyalty or values a self serving self enriching fop who sides with and support Racism, Xenophobia, sexual intollerance, violence and anti Judaism together with pro EU membership political low lifes in the EU a man who permitted Croucher to, to quote the judge, acted as an agent for UKIP to try to destroy freedom of speech by seeking to bankrupt me through the Courts.

I think that it is more honourable to support an honest man with a different point of view than a dishonest man willing to prostitute himself and his supporters for personal gain – what do you think?

#950* – UKIP – Malcolm Lord PEARSON on STRAIGHT TALK

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

UKIP – Malcolm Lord PEARSON on STRAIGHT TALK!
Interviewed by Andrew NEIL Provided A VERY Comfortable Platform which becase sooooo boring, even Pearson realised how tedious it was!

Hi,

Andrew Neil interviews Lord Pearson, Leader of the UK Independence Party.

Malcolm Pearson talks about his time in the Conservative Party before leaving to join UKIP and becoming its leader. He also discusses his party’s prospects at the next General Election, the challenges and economic implications for Britain in leaving the EU, and finally his thoughts on the result of a hung Parliament and his party’s tactic in supporting eurosceptic candidates of other political parties.

Available until:

10:59pm Saturday 17th April 2010

http://bbc.co.uk/i/s2prn/
or
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00s2prn

/Straight_Talk_Lord_Pearson_of_Rannoch_Leader_of_the_UK_Independence_Party/

At least Pearson acquits himself adequately, if somewhat tediously and it is possible to show the whole 30 minutes unlike Nigel Farage’s catastrophic performance on Hard Talk when interviewed by Stephen Sackur – possibly his first difficult interview where he was very clearly out of his depth and even his sychophants like the odious Stuart Parr could only find a small percentage of the broadcast they could leave un editted see the official sanitised version with only 1/3rd. remaining:

The full interview showed that the showman’s act was wearing very thin these days and all of this was before The Sunday Times exposed Lord Pearson, Nigel Farage, David Bannerman, Stuart Agnew and Peter Reeve for the dishonest and stupid rascals they really are!

I note the Risible Reeve claims, in the Huntingdon Town Crier of the 8th. April, to work 38 hours a week for Agnew and Bannerman thus effectively biting the hand that feeds him by accusing Stuart Agnew of being an outright liar – well we knew Agnew was a cheat, a scoundrel, a bully and an odious and arrogant idiot but it was interesting to be told that he is clearly a liar by his staff!

However let is take the Risible Reeve’s evidence with a pinch of salt as he goes on to say he works voluntarily for UKIP for between 70 & 100 hours a week!

This is a chappie who is paid some £12K as a County Councillor, is a local Councillor, sits on the board of governors of a couple of schools, brings up a raft of his and other chaps kids and has a partner who is CEO of UKIP – presumably a full time occupation!

You do the maths:
24hrs. x 7 days = 168 hrs a week

Reeve claims to work for UKIP between:
38 hrs. + 70 hrs. = 108 hrs.
&
38 hrs. + 100 hrs. = 138 hrs.

Thus sleep, bathing, child care, County Council work, eating, dressing, local Council work, Governors meetings and the like are crammed into, some weeks, a mere 4 hrs. 20 mins. or at best 8 hrs. 40 mins.

Mr. Peter Reeve you are either a cheat, a liar, a scoundrel or a total fraud.

May I suggest that in view of the time available that Social Services take a very close look at this family and consider taking their children into care – A suggestion I make with tongue in cheek as I just find The Risible Reeve’s claims to be utterly dishonest – so much so that I find Stuart Agnew and The Sunday Times far more plausible that the local comic the Toen Crier and Risible Reeve!

One would expect David Bannerman to accuse Stuart Agnew and The Sunday Times of being liars to try to save his sordid self perception but David Bannerman is a proven liar, utterly duplicitous and a cheat – so very typical of UKIP I regret to say.

Agnew, Bannerman, Reeve and their fellows in the leadership of UKIP are the scum and the froth of politics dishonest and corrupt to the core – Farage is no better but perhaps his moral dyslexia does exonerate him in some way as it is a clearly perceptable mental illness. He is bereft of ethics and integrity on all counts it would seem in his self delusional narcissism.

I understand that complaints have been lodged with Risible Reeve’s Council by at least one senior Councillor bringing to their attention that Risible Reeve, seemingly a serial liar, brings the Council into disrepute.

I am also well aware of complaints made Officially by a number of people to:

1. The Standards in Public Life Commission
2. Parliamentary Standards Commission
3. The Chief Constable, Metropolitan Police
4. The Electoral Commission
5. OLAF

I understand:

1. The Standards in Public Life Commission
   have not as yet responded
2. Parliamentary Standards Commission
   Claim to have no jurisdiction over MEPs or Peers.
3. The Chief Constable, Metropolitan Police
   Have acknowledge receipt
4. The Electoral Commission
   Have acknowledged receipt and it has moved up to ‘Officially under investigation’
5. OLAF
   Receipt has been acknowledge however they are on Easter Break and will follow up on their return.