Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
#925* – The LIES of STUART PARR & SYSTEMIC DISHONESTY OF EUkip.
Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!
The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
The LIES of STUART PARR & SYSTEMIC DISHONESTY OF EUkip & THEIR ABJECT FAILURES UNDER THE DPA.!
Hi,
Minden of the pernicious dishonesty of Stuart Parr on the Officially promoted Bloggers4Ukip and having noted the unpleasant twaddle he has published in attack mode against Nikkie Sinclaire amongst his endless misrepresentations and lies is his ill informed opinion with regard to The Data Protection Act – this may well be due to the deliberate leaking of material by another agent of EUkip who had located some material considered sensitive which he decided to react and circulate – some indication of just how hubristic EUkip are when it comes to their legal duties.
little Stuart also seems to know nothing of copyright law and less about libel gratuitously libelling me with his lies and others without being able to substantiate his lies yet bleating when facts are wrotten about him!
Here are the two pages as redacted:
& here is Page 2:
However of far more interest was what was Mark Croucher seeking to airbrush out.
Here is the unredacted document published now to show Stuart Parr for the dishonest and unpleasant fool he most certainly is.
Here is the full text of the private letter to EUkip’s chairman which Croucher accessed and published:
Mr Paul Nuttall –Party ChairmanUK Independence PartyHead OfficePO Box 408, Newton AbbotTQ12 9BG7th April 2009Case Reference Number RFA0208845Dear Mr NuttallThank you for your letter dated 22 February 2009 and the attached report from your colleague Mr David Challice. Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding to your letter.You have stated that it is not the practice of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) to place personal data onto laptop computers. However, Mr Challice’s letter states that “staff at Head Office rarely use laptops”, indicating that laptop computers may sometimes be used. Mr Challice also states that personal information may be placed on a “removable data stick” for the use on a laptop during the annual party conference. For the purposes of principle 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (the Act), we do not draw a distinction between data sticks and laptop computers. It is the view of the Information Commissioner’s Officer (ICO) that any portable device or electronic media used to store and/or transmit personal data must be encrypted in order to be considered compliant with principle 7. We do not consider password protection alone to offer an adequate level of protection.In any event, we have been informed that on this occasion, a laptop computer was used. This laptop, containing Mr John West’s video interview, was not encrypted at the time that it was lost by Miss Annabelle Fuller, who was a member of staff at UKIP at the time of the incident. It therefore appears unlikely that UKIP has complied with the Act when processing Mr West’s personal data.As we do not have sufficient evidence to support either UKIP’s or Mr West’s version of events in this case, we will not be taking any further action against UKIP or Miss Fuller at this time, and I will therefore be closing this case. However, it is of concern that Mr West’s personal data, for which UKIP was the data controller responsible, has been allowed to be disclosed in such amanner. In particular, we must take into consideration the fact that this video related to Mr West’s political opinions (defined as “sensitive personal data” under section 2 of the Act) and that its release is likely to have caused him a considerable amount of distress. We are also concerned at the apparent lack of remedial action taken by UKIP to prevent against such an incident occurring in the future, and the apparent lack of a clear policy that covers the use of portable devices to process personal data, despite the fact that it appears such processing does occur (albeit somewhat infrequently).I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate that any portable device or electronic media (including laptop computers) used to store and/or transmit personal data must be encrypted in order to be considered compliant with the Act. UKIP should therefore ensure that any such devices it does use are encrypted and that its mobile computing and data security policies reflect this. UKIP must also ensure that its staff receive adequate training to comply with these policies.While we will not be taking further action at this time, we will be retaining this case on file and taking it into account should we receive any further complaints of a similar nature. Please be aware that any further incidents involving the loss of an unencrypted device containing personal data are likely to result in formal enforcement action.Yours sincerelyRick Syers – Enforcement OfficerRegulatory Action Division
That Croucher accessed these at a time when he claimed not to be working for EUkip shows the cavalier attitude to data that EUkip has, and its clearly unfit for purpose attitudes.
At around this time Croucher also accessed EUkip computers and seemingly deliberately leaked information in an effort to ‘frame’ Piers Merchant who was dieing at the time and thus made no effort to defend himself against the unpleasant behaviour of EUkip and Croucher in particular.
TO LEAVE THE EU
What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples – they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.
NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.
Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.
The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!
To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62
PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!
I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country.
Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
to Reclaim YOUR Future
&
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Ukip-vs-EUkip 