Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
Ukip’s Enquiry Into The Fight Between Its MEPs An Inadequate Whitewash!
Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 26/10/2016
Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins
Greg_L-W
eMail: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
. Re-TWEET my Twitterings.
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
Ukip’s Enquiry Into The Fight Between Its MEPs An Inadequate Whitewash showing Ukip is inadequate to conduct a simple enquiry let alone represent Britain on an international stage!
Hi,
a whitewash to try to provide damage limitation for Ukip was of course inevitable in respect of the altercation between Steven Woolfe & Mike Hookem Ukip’s two MEPs who became involved in an altercation that by the addmision of both parties became physical – the only disputed fact is whether Hookem did or did not punch Woolfe.
That Hookem was rapidly spiritted away by his staff member Annabelle Fuller thus avoiding any embarrassing questions until a damage limitation story was in place. That he was unavailable to answer questions, believed to have been sheltered from the press in a VIP area before leaving Strasburg and returning to Britain early. That the proven liar and cheat Annabelle Fuller, sometimes passed off as Beatrix Trixie Sanderson, leads one to believe that her role was to keep Hookem out of sight and weave a tissue of lies to try to dupe the media as she has in the past.
I believe therefore that there is absolutely no rational grounds to believe a single word attributed to Hookem.
As for Woolfe, there is little doubt that his behaviour was foolish and irresponsible in the extreme. How can these two idiots be considered suitable international representatives of anything let alone constituencies of around 5 Million people!
That Ukip came up with this as the outcome of their enquiry and then fielded the most odious and ill mannered individual to defend themselves on the media speaks volumes of their squalid little party as does the abusive and pugnacious outburst of Hookem in the EU’s undemocratic and unprincipled chamber challenging Martin Schultz to Court action!
“The decision of Mr Hookem to join Mr Woolfe in the ante room is the only action which I have the ability to consider for disciplinary action. In the absence of eye witnesses, the true facts of what took place in the ante room itself are impossible to determine and neither man has made an official complaint to the party over the incident.“Had Mr Woolfe not collapsed later that day, we may never have known that the altercation took place at all.“However, as Chairman, I’m appalled that such a situation could arise between two of our most high profile representatives and I have strongly considered suspension as a possible course of action.“I do however take into consideration the following:(1) The apology and regret shown by Mr Hookem, for agreeing to join Mr Woolfe in the ante room.(2) The excellent record of Mr Hookem in representing UKIP and its values prior to this incident.(3) Acknowledging that Mr Hookem, whilst foolish, was not the instigator of this incident or subsequent press coverage and as such cannot be held principally responsible for either taking place.”“In light of this, a formal reprimand will be placed on Mr Hookem’s internal record, to be considered in the event of a reoccurrence of any infraction which might cause damage to the reputation of the party.”
This statement from Ukip, at the end of their utterly inadequate enquiry, was totally predictable and also speaks volumes of both Ukip and the calliber of its MEPs who they have shown clearly to be untrustworthy as even Ukip’s enquiry has effectively admitted they can not trust the evidence of either of their own MEPs!
Interestingly we are given to understand that Ukip have also not accorded credibility to either the hospital, the doctors or the para medics or alternatively didn’t even obtain their evidence!
Fortunately Woolfe has issued a statement that he has made an official complaint to the police and we also have the public statement of Martin Schultz that he has requested the French Police to conduct an enquiry and we can be certain they will be granted public access to the EU building and its staff and incumbents.
This rightly moves the assault to a criminal footing for the police to investigate, thus clearly the Ukip statement can be treated with contempt and be dismissed as nothing more than a very amateur attempt to seek to act as damage limitation for the party.
Regards,
Greg_L-W.
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
&
&
Also:
ABOUT ME, Details & Links: CLICK HERE
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Summary & archive, facts & comments on Ukip: http://Ukip-vs-EUkip.com
General ‘Stuff’: http://GL-W.com
Leave-The-EU Referendum & BreXit Process CLICK HERE
Documents, Essays & Treaties: CLICK HERE
The Hamlet of Stroat: CLICK HERE
Data & The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE
Health Blog.: CLICK HERE
Chepstow Chat: CLICK HERE
Christopher Story: CLICK HERE
Des Watkins DFC; CdeG: CLICK HERE/
Hollie Greig etc.: CLICK HERE
Psycheocracy: CLICK HERE
The McCann Case: CLICK HERE
The Speculative Society of Edinburgh: CLICK HERE
Stolen Kids, Dunblane: CLICK HERE
Stolen Kids, Bloggers: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
A Concept of Governance Worthy of Developement: CLICK HERE
Skype: GregL-W
TWITTER: @Greg_LW
Stolen Kids Blogs with links:
http://StolenKids-Bloggers.Blogspot.com
Stolen Oyster with links:
http://StolenOyster-Bloggers.Blogspot.com
Stolen Trust with links:
http://StolenTrust-Bloggers.Blogspot.com
Stolen Childhood with links:
http://StolenChildhood-Bloggers.Blogspot.com
- I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
- ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
- I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
- I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
- I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
- I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
- I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
- I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
- I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
- I am NOT a WARMIST
- I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
- I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
- I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
- I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
- I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
- I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
- I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
- I do NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence
- I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
- I try to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual
Please Be Sure To
..
Re-TWEET my Twitterings
This entry was posted on 26/10/2016 at 22:42 and is filed under EU, EUkip, UKIP. Tagged: GL-W, Greg Lance-Watkins, Greg_L-W, Mike Hookem, Steven WOOLFE, UKIP, Ukip Fight Enquiry, Ukip Statement Inadequate. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Ukip-vs-EUkip 
We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse. No comment has EVER been barred or deleted which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual. You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner. We welcome genuine comments.