UKIP Have A Skill at Getting It WRONG!
.
Please Be Sure To .
. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
To Spread The Facts World Wide
.
Clean EUkip up NOW make UKIP electable!
.
The corruption of EUkip’s leadership,
their anti UKIP claque in POWER & the NEC
is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
.
UKIP Have A Skill at Getting It WRONG!
Sadly a skill with a near perfect consistency when it comes to failure in domestic elections!!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
.
Farage’s latest Tory deal – deja vu all over again!
Back in 2010 when Farage had resigned as leader in order to come third in the Bucks seat to dwarf Bercow and almost get himself killed in a plane crash, his stooge leader Pearson produced his whizzo electoral pact plan in the South West that UKIP candidates should stand down in about 6 seats where there was an avowedly Eurosceptic Tory candidate to avoid spliting the right wing vote. Pearson was the UKIP leader who had not bothered to read his own General Election manifesto and resigned shortly after the May 2010 UKIP electoral failure to allow Nigel to return from his temporary Bucks exile. Pearson’s proposals were not well received by the UKIP activists in the South West. Let us hope the Hamiltons meet the same frosty reception in 2014.
Roll on 3 years to the run up to the 2015 general election and I read in today’s DT, “Farage in talks on deal with 20 Eurosceptic MPs”, is the headline. As it says in Eccelesiastes the sun rises and the sun sets and there is nothing new under the sun even the one that shines out of Farage’s bum on the poor saps in UKIP. Click on http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10081456/Nigel-Farage-I-can-do-deals-at-the-next-election-with-20-Conservative-MPs.html to read the piece now entitled, “I can do deals with 20 Conservative MPs at next election”. Why only 20 Nigel, why not the 100 who are currently feeling their majorities. That’s the figure Nads mentions in her Sunday paper piece.
The DT piece also reveals that follwing his less than successful visit to Scotland Nigel has had to hire a team of bodyguards to protect himself in Westminster. How much is this costing UKIP? Nigel does not do paying but he is quoted that UKIP is mounting a fresh drive to recruit more white working class Labour voters. Are these the bodyguards referred to in the previous paragraph?
What will the deal be to support these untrustworthy Tories? What will be the payback to UKIP? There will of course be no details that the UKIP NEC will see because the deal will be between Farage and the Tories not UKIP and the Tories. Farage has long craved the warm feeling of red leather on his bum. That would allow him to maintain his lucrative position as MEP and obergruppenfurher in Brussels. Its a win win situation for Nigel.but on his own figures 20 UKIP activists will be shafted. Clearly a price worth paying as Nigel does not have to do the paying. Lord Farage of Brussels or even Waterloo only a few miles away.
The real politik is that Pearson has a valid point. In 2010 in Wells the LibDem Tessa Munt defeated the Euro sceptic Heathcote Amory by 800 votes with the UKIP candidate who in losing his deposited polled 1710 votes more than twice La Munt’s majority. The same thing happened at Eastleigh where if the Tories had stood down in favour of Mrs James she would have been elected as MP with a 10000+ majority and would be headed to be UKIP leader by acclamation at the next Sept conference.
The problem is one can never trust the Tories or ex-Tory Nigel Farage. My word is my bond used to be the dictum in the City but not any more. It is a conumdrum that I can see no way out of without breaching electoral law. Cameron did his sordid deal wih Clegg not for the good of the country but to get into Downing Street. Clegg did it to get his bum into the Cabinet with his dodgy cronies like Huhne and Laws. It was for the good of the country they cry. Bollocks I say self interest rules OK in politics, always has always will. It was the same when Farage tried to tell me many Tory MPs entered parliament to serve their country. I laughed. MPs serve themselves and help themselves to as much public money as they can get without going to gaol.
Clegg signed a pledge to the students in public before the last election. After he had their votes that pledge was not worth the paper it was written on. Note how that other LibDem pledge on giving constituents the power to recall MPs who break their election promised has mysteriously disappeared from the political landscape. I wonder why?
It can’t be done within our current system of party dominated representative democracy. The only way out is the Swiss referendum way. If 10% of the electorate in a constituency demand their MP resign and contest a by-election then it happens. That would be a stiff test to pass given only 60% of the electorate bother to vote but it would provide a real discpline on our sordid MPs who get elected and thenwave two fingers at the electorate for the next 4 years.
I can hear the criticism now, its not the British way, what about the Queen etc. Well it seems to work jolly well for the Swiss who have created a great country and they don’t even have a Queen. Note however our royal family are very fond of holidays in Switzerland and ask yourself why? Even Mrs T used to go on holiday there. Its nice to stay in a country that works and lacks diversity.
Dr. Eric Edmond blogs on a regular basis on UKIP, much of which I agree with – however his lack of answers and inability to control his temper let him down badly when he was elected to UKIP NEC and was so rapidly out manoevered by Farage and his cronies.
Out manoevered by the presentation of a pack of lies against him which he was unable to defend himself against dispassionately and his volatility lost him both the argument and friends!
That said his blog has bee a regular commentary on the follies of Farage and his cronies and also is a well informed insight into the vagieries of the banking world, which formed a considerable part of his background where with his Doctorate in mathematics his skills were exploited at the Bank of England.
I do commend that anyone seeking a clear understanding of the banking issues of Britain and the EU make a point of reading his blog regularly and along the way one will pick up some facts pertaining to the corruption of UKIP that may have passed you by.
Eric’s opinions are a good point from which to start a debate on the protocols and policies of UKIP, in as far as they have any worth discussing!
On the issue of colaboration with Tories opposed to membership of The EU Eric overlooks the previous election when Farage set out to work with EUroSceptic MPs and PPCs and working to a shortlist which I drew up aeveral UKIP PPCs stood down and all was doing well until that foul mouthed, bufoon Nattrass had a temper tantrum and decided to personally make a fool of himself standing against one of the most noted Tory EUroSceptics and also recruited the owner of his favourite Chines restaurant to stand against another!
The entire election became a total farce for UKIP with the normal catastrophic outcome, from which they had to be saved by Dr. Richard North and I dreaming up the myth that they had cost the Tories 27 seats – which Richard took forward as a paper for The Brughes Group!
It seemed essential that UKIP was given some relevance in view of their serial failures in domestic elections where even now they are realistically no closer to having an MP elected and out of over 1,700 seats contested they managed a mere 147 elected and even they seem to be falling like flies when under the spotlight!!
.
~~~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~~~
Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Deny the self serving political clique ANY Democratic claims to legitimacy
Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:
to Reclaim YOUR Future
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK
Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 01594 – 528 337
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
TWITTER: Greg_LW
Please Be Sure To .. Re-TWEET my Twitterings
Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W)
Ukip-vs-EUkip 
We welcome comments but reserve the right to moderate & refuse libelous or offensive comments and those we choose to delete when written by unidentifiable individuals hidden in anonymity in a cowardly manner to defame or abuse. No comment has EVER been barred or deleted which is genuine & clearly authored by a named & identifiable individual. You will note many comments made have been commented on and even corrected by the blog owner. We welcome genuine comments.