Ukip-vs-EUkip

We aim to inform YOU & provide an archive re: Ukip to TRY to make it fit for purpose

  • GOOGLE TRANSLATE

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • TWITTER N.I.Bs.

  • PAGES:

  • Just Say NO to EU

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • FleXit A WAY FORWARD

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • HoC – EU Exit Plan

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • EU_Referendum.com

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • JUNIUS On UKIP

    JUNIUS is a Blog authored by informed individual in The EU 'Team UKIP'; Supporters of UKIP over many years who seek to expose corruption & make UKIP genuinely elec table for the informed!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • REFERENDUM & How To Win!

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • Greg LANCE-WATKINS Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com

  • Contact YOUR Political Servants

    Contact Your Politician
    writetothem.com
  • GLOBAL WARMING, Heaven and Earth

    PLIMER, Proff. Ian

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • October 2009
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Flying Spaghetti Monster

    TO VIEW: Just CLICK The Picture

  • The EU In A Nutshell

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee & STARKEY, Dr. David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The EUropean PARLIAMENT

    CORBETT, Richard; JACOBS, Francis & SHACKLETON, Michael

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The European Union

    BOMBERG, Elizabeth; CORBETT, Richard & PETERSON, John

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • GLOBAL WARMING, The Real Disaster

    BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The GREAT DECEPTION

    NORTH, Dr. Richard & BOOKER, Christopher

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The MANY NOT THE FEW

    Dr. Richard NORTH

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • MINISTRY of DEFEAT

    NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The RIGHTS of ENGLISHMEN

    YOUNG, William - 1793

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • The ROTTEN HEART of EUROPE

    CONNOLLY, Bernard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • SCARED to DEATH

    BOOKER, Christopher & NORTH, Dr. Richard

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Ten Years on

    ROTHERHAM, Dr. Lee

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • VIGILANCE

    MOTE, Ashley (MEP rtd.)

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • Voodoo Histories

    AARONOVITCH, David

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

  • WATERMELONS

    DELINGPOLE, James

    TO VIEW: Just Click The Picture

Archive for October 25th, 2009

#684* – Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/10/2009

#684* – Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Malcolm LORD PEARSON of RANNOCK – Leadership Candidate!!!

Hi,

I was most interested to visit Lord Pearsons leadership web site at CLICK HERE

The very first line tells us much:
The full site will be live very shortly but in the meantime here is my manefesto…

does this explain much of his fear of Islam? He has a manefesto where many would have a manifesto – perhaps he is a Buddist – Ommmmmmm Maneeeee Festooooo Ommmmmmmm!

Anyway it continues to say:


Personal Statement from Lord Pearson of Rannoch


Although I understood his reasoning, I deeply regretted Nigel’s decision to step down as leader. Sadly my efforts to get him to change his mind, publicly at the conference and privately, have been to no avail.


I had to think long and hard before putting my own name forward to lead UKIP. I knew that were my bid successful, I would be committing to an indefinite period of hard work and would have to forgo directorships and other interests. However I also realised that any sacrifice would be trivial compared to those made by Nigel Farage over nearly two decades. Dauntingly, I would also find myself successor to the most eloquent politician in the land.


Initially I declined to volunteer because I lacked ambition to lead a political party. But I believe passionately in my country and in the democracy and freedom which so many generations have fought to win and defend, often at terrible cost, all now being sold out by a selfish and deluded generation of gutless professional politicians.


In the end it was the sheer persistence of many UKIP members and donors who said that it was my duty to offer myself to my country’s service. I suppose that is arm-twisting UKIP style!


So what can I offer you?


Perhaps I should start by telling you what I am not. In a party with 13 MEPs I am not an elected politician. You must consider whether that is or is not a virtue. It does mean that I am available in this country, without the continual distraction of continental travel. Certainly I am well placed by my seat in the House of Lords to articulate our case. It is, of course, Westminster where these great issues must eventually be decided.


That I am not a professional politician may be no disadvantage in an age when our political class is widely despised. My background is in international insurance. I would like to think that habits such as delegation, training and financial discipline might be useful in the necessary reorganisation of a party whose power and influence has outgrown its infrastructure.


There is one particular area where I feel I should be able to contribute usefully. With the likely implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, these are perilous days. We are desperately short of time if we are to save our great country. This means we have to rapidly recruit and train a large force of people dedicated to national survival. To this end we need to cast a broad net and my contacts with the wider Eurorealist movement could prove very valuable. Along with David Willoughby de Broke in the Lords, as well as through my activities with Global Britain, I can lay some claim to having rare contacts throughout the movement. I hope that I enjoy some respect from people as politically diverse as Lords Stoddart and Tebbit and with others less well known but with considerable financial assets and patriotic dedication. As far as I know, I have no enemies within UKIP and remain on good terms with many who have left us.


What of my political philosophy? I am essentially interested in conserving the British constitution against all who threaten it, most particularly from those “Traitors within the Gate”, the British politicians who have betrayed their own people.


It is rare for a new party to survive long in British politics. UKIP has stood that test of time and changed the political agenda singlehandedly. Our recent success must now be turned to maximum advantage.


We must develop the quality of our candidates and activists. This requires training, with experienced campaigners helping those who have yet to cut their political teeth. This has to be backed up by activity manuals and informative literature. As someone who has provided (I hope useful) publications such as “What is the point of the European Union?” and “BETTER OFF OUT” I may have something to offer here.


We have speak to the British people in straightforward language. Against the background of the country’s financial crisis, we must show how leaving the EU is positive, invigorating, vastly enriching; in short everything to be welcomed and absolutely nothing to be feared. Hand in glove with this goes the promotion of binding national and local referendums. Only thus can power be returned to the people from the political class in Westminster and Brussels.


UKIP policies should be short and incisive and targeted to emphasise what can only be achieved by leaving the EU. They should also be selected to embarrass the old parties by showing how their political correctitude has left them out of touch with the basic common sense of real people. Examples abound: Their refusal to entrust us with education vouchers or to insist on work permits for foreigners; their failure to maintain our borders and their appeasement of militant Islam.


My ambition is for UKIP to do well enough in the General Election to trigger a revolutionary realignment of British politics. In place of our current ‘one party state’, with all the older parties blindly deferring to the EU, we desperately need a new and genuine Opposition. Already many Conservative MPs and most of their activists are with us. Many decent Labour and Lib Dem supporters are also getting the point.


Our priority, which cannot be overstated, must be to maintain our aim of an amicable divorce from the European Union. My slogan is “Friendship and Free Trade only.” Anything and everything we do must be directed to this end and nothing must compromise this objective.


We now have a growing majority of the British people who share this view and a monopoly, amongst the moderate political parties, in expressing it. This is an electoral gold mine.


I shall feel honoured and humbled if you elect me to lead what is the noblest cause in British politics today. But whoever is elected can rely on my full support.


Malcolm Pearson


Biography.


Lord Pearson of Rannoch was born in 1942 and educated at Eton.


In 1964 he founded the PWS Group of international insurance brokers, which went public in 1984 and was sold to the THB Group in 2008. He is now Hon. President but is willing to sacrifice that position should he become leader of UKIP.


During 1975-82 he was the main protagonist in the “Savonita Affair” at Lloyd’s of London, when his refusal to collect a fraudulent claim led to reform at Lloyd’s, and a new Act of Parliament.


From 1984-90 he actively promoted freedom in the Soviet Union through financial and other assistance to dissident groups.


In the period 1983-92 he represented commerce on the Council for National Academic Awards, Britain’s largest degree awarding body, which validated the courses in our Polytechnics (Universities since 1992). He joined with Baroness Cox and others in fighting far left control of Teacher Training, Social and Media Studies, etc.


In 1984 he founded the Rannoch Charitable Trust, which has funded such things as refugees from Communism in Europe, various human rights initiatives, research into British state education, the environment of the Scottish Highlands, free market economics and Islamic fundamentalism.


In 1990 Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher raised him to the Peerage.


During 1991-97 he led several successful amendments in the Lords on Scottish environmental legislation.


In 1992 he received an Honorary Doctorate (of Laws) from Council of National Academic Awards, for services to Higher Education.


During 1992-96 he was a Member of the House of Lords Select Committee on the European Union, which led him to become a leading exponent of the case for the UK to leave the European Union.


In 1992 he became Hon. President of RESCARE – The National Society for Mentally Handicapped People in Residential Care, a subject where he has family experience.


In 1998 he joined with Lord Harris of High Cross (Independent) and Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Labour) to found “Global Britain”, a non-party think tank, to research alternatives to UK membership of the European Union. (See http://www.globalbritain.org )


In 2004 he lost the Conservative whip for suggesting that people should lend their vote to the UK Independence Party, in elections to the European Parliament, and now sits in the Lords, along with Lord Willoughby de Broke, as a UKIP peer.


His many speeches can be found on http://www.lordswhips.org.uk/


His belief in freedom of speech and disregard of controversy was illustrated in 2009 when he invited the Dutch MP, Geert Wilders, to show his anti-Islamist film, “Fitna”, in a press conference at the House of Lords. When Mr. Wilders was banned by the Home Secretary from entering the UK, Lord Pearson went ahead with the film and accused the British Government of appeasing Islamism. (Google: “Fitna” and “Geert Wilders”).


For many years he has been an articulate critic of the institutional pro EU bias of the BBC and has personally invested in research, proving the case much to their discomfiture.


Lord Pearson’s Web Site CLICK HERE will be available in the
near future.

Let us hope he does not fall foul of ‘The Firm’ and have Her Majesty speaking out in The News of The World against him for having seized her flag as his banner – she has seized on Griffin and his having chosen Winston Churchill and The Spitfire as a theme which EUkip thought was so good that they copied the idea!

I wonder if Her Majesty had been aware that the liar and cheat David Bannerman had visually tried to imply some similarity to Churchill or the part trying to use the symbolism of TheBNP which seems increasingly accurate as EUkip allies itself with the most extreme of racist xenophobes, anti Jewish, violent sexually intollerant bigots that membership of their new Pan EU Political Party group could muster.

We must wait to see if Pearson knows ANYTHING about EUkip or just the lies of Farage and if all goes to plan he can stand down after the General Election if Farage gets elected he can hand the party to David Bannerman to continue the destruction or back to Farage if he fails at Buckingham to fulfill his ambitions.

Meanwhile let us see at what stage EUkip is abandonned and the new Pan EU Party takes over, as posted in my other blog!

Lord Pearson makes a good patsy to carry forward Farage’s ambitions.
TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in UKIP | Leave a Comment »

#683* – Bertie RESIGNS AS BRANCH CHAIRMAN!!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/10/2009

#683* – Bertie RESIGNS AS BRANCH CHAIRMAN!!

EDIT @ 22:00hrs. 25-Oct-2009 see below

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

Bertie RESIGNS AS BRANCH CHAIRMAN! – Junius! & Christopher GILL!

Hi,

Thanks for passing on the enquiry / information. someone on Junius WILL see this within a matter of hours and it is up to them to post it or not.

I suggest that anyone reading this does so with GREAT caution. The ID of the sender originally is NOT known to either John West or myself and there is no way to check on the veracity of the information.

I am only posting this because I feel it is up to YOU to decide if it is a spoof or not, especially as John West received it and has passed it to me to post and since it is 04:15hrs. he might be a tad miffed if I phoned him to check!!! If you like let me have YOUR number and I’ll call you at about this time one day this week!!! See now you know how John & Alison would feel – but if it really was important for UKIP or Britain I KNOW he wouldn’t even grumble as he has NEVER seemed to be acting out of personal interest in all my dealings with him – just an unrelenting determination to try to clean EUkip up to make it electable on principle again one day.

EDIT @ 22:00hrs. 25-Oct-2009 see below

Please note that having had the ‘gut’ feel that the ‘e’Mail I had been asked to post and pass on to Junius was decidedly iffy I DID post it and also mailed all those who seemingly had received the original ‘e’Mail direct and warned them of my belief the ‘e’Mail was a spoof – rather badly faked.

I have done further checking today in the interest of doing all I reasonably can to ensure my Blogs are as accurate as they can be.

I have located, after conversation and phone calls to senior EUkip members, a branch styled ‘UKIP Solihull & Meriden’ – this site shows absolutely no record I could find of anyone named ‘Bertie’ nor any apparent record of having had a Branch Chairman of that name. Least of all one who was near totally illiterate. Following the obvious link to their WordPress.Blog I note that ‘Bertie’ brings up no return on the search engine on the latter and only 2 results on the web site – both related to Ireland!

I would like to thank the various EUkip staff & members who assisted in ensuring CaterpillarsAndButterflies Blog is maintained as an accurate source of factual information.

I am now happy to state with some certainty that the Resignation of Bertie as a Chairman from EUkip is a total spoof. I leave it to EUkip to ascertain who is trying to damage them with this spoof resignation – suffice to say I am glad my judgement was proven 100% correct.

Relax bite the head off of a Bassett licorice allsort Bertie and settle down for the late night movie!

END OF EDIT – Please let people know the FACTS give them the URL of this blog.

THANKS
Anyway here is the message:

Dear REDACTED,


Thanks for the info. I am not in direct contact with anyone on junius but I know Greg L-W is. I will forward the email to him for use on caterpillars and butterflies. Here is the url –


http://caterpillarsandbutterflies.blogspot.com/


I am sure he will pass it on to the junius team. Their url is –


http://juniusonukip.blogspot.com/


Hope this helps.


Best wishes


John West


——————————————————————————–
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:59:09 -0700
From: REDACTED@ymail.com
Subject: FW: Merdien Branch Chairman Resigns
To: johnwest81@REDACTED




John I was sent the below yesterday , perhaps something you could put it on Junius’s blog.


Regards


Tim




FW:


Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:29:03
From: callingactivists@yahoo.co.uk
To: ukipmepnattrass@hotmail.co.uk , tonygleaves@btconnect.com , jeff576@hotmail.com , tb7@aol.com , ray@orange.net , josiehurbett@yahoo.co.uk , milley89@hotmail.com , josh.onyons@ukip.org ,  lorrainemaster@gmail.com , ukipmerdien@googlemail.com , ukipmerdien-press@yahoo.co.uk , davidh@uw.net , barrylouise@feeola.com , jannetloyd@freeserve.co.uk ,
Subject: RE: My Resignation


Dear Members,


I am sorry to inform you, I have deciced to resign my UKIP membership and therfor I will be stepping down as the chairman of the Merdien Branch. It is clear now that our MEPs have gone niave and are now only out for them selfs. With Nigel steping down with have now lost our only asset.


I fully realise that my decision may be inconvenient due to the forthcoming election, but I sincerely believe that UKIP has served its purpose. We will I believe now remain a member of the EU which ever party is in Parliament.


I hope we will all stay in touch.


Best Wishes,


Bertie

I would hazard a guess this is a spoof – only Peter Cole also posting on Anthony Butcher’s vile bullying and corrupt BDF as Legin (a name he chose when posting from Tom Wise’s offices I understand because they thought Nigel was ‘backward’), It could be little Joshua Onions if he hasn’t gone back to school, Nattrass is another candidate also McGough all of whom have spelling that isconsistently worse than mine.

I gather since he last posted on the Forum Legin has been trying to spell shoulder and chip in the right order! As an ex trucker he spells that very slowly for fear of being more accurate!

If it is not one of them it could well be Croucher he has not only been proven to be dishonest and has tampered with computers to mislead people in the past – now that he is an OFFICIAL spokescreep for EUkip or some other corrupt organisation or group of racists and sexually intollerant political scum. I spoke to lead journalists at 5 major papers since Thursday and their general opinion was that EUkip were finished and it was hard to sell running a EUkip only story to their editors and even harder with no press staff they were prepared to trust since Clive Page has left since the main stream media have little but contempt for EUkip, Death Rowe, Croucher, Towler or Gulleyslime.

I never cease to be astonished at the places where EUkip have managed to make enemies – earlier in the week a well known supporter, very much on the inside was supplying me with details and facts to show who may have supplied the mailing list and sold it to TheBNP. The list was long and astonishingly he supplied reasons why they would dump on EUkip for all of them! IInterestingly he also believed the list was supplied by a UKIP supporter revolted by the way EUkip were behaving and some of the scum that are parasites like McGough, Croucher, Bannerman, Smith, Curtis, Nuttall, Rowe, Andreasen who came up from many sources.

It was a general consensus that although John West, Petrina Holdsworth, Gregg Beaman, Chris Hudson and I may well have the lists but none of us would dream of dealing with TheBNP and in fact more than half of those who listed any of these latter names believed as a matter of principle none would pass on or supply a list to another party. When I pointed out that West, Holdsworth & I all supported the principles if not the pedestrian progress of UKFirstParty they did not believe that any of us would use a EUkip list we may hold to recruit for another party as a matter of principle.

So I wonder who this possibly mythical Bertie is as I can’t find him on my list with ease and Merdien doesn’t even come up on Google & now that Del Young, Peter Cole have left EUkip no branch chairman spells like our Bertie! Perhaps like NuttAll he couldn’t spell his own name actually his name is Michael or David because as David Bannerman doesn’t know who he is and McGough is so dellusional he believed he was the PPC for Harlow!

Anyway who or is Bertie is up to you – I’ve done my bit by passing the message on.

IN PASSING:

Do read the article at: CLICK HERE it is quite funny once you notice there isn’t a valid quote in it then note the paper it is in and the fact that it is pure speculation based on sloppy journalism swallowing the most childish of press releases and theopries whole!

I well note after the utter idiocy forced on EUkip by the political idiot Nattrass at the last General Election when EUkip did so catastrophically – as likely yet again. Nattrass forced EUkip to act like idiots standing everywhere rather than using intelligence and targetting seats. The result was such a disaster for EUkip that a couple of us believed EUkip still had a role to play bringing pressure on the Tories so we went through the lists and results and cobbled up a list of 27 that we stated catagorically EUkip had done so well they had lost the seat for The Tories.

Due to sloppy journalism by the time most UKIP members and Tories got up that morning a mass of journalists had been tricked into copying our articles scattered around the internet and they then published it as fact. You will remember as a result Conservative Way Forward was formed and also Better Off Out.

The article you have just read in The Observer seems a very similar spoof!

Little changes – Do not forget that Christopher Gill who was Farage’s new best friend then was in fact backing Richard Suchorzewski against Farage as were Alan Wood, Toby Twirl and many others – here is Gill’s support letter and they had a long private meeting I heard about through the owner of the golf club they met at! The plot to bring Farage under control before he destroyed UKIP and turned it into a corrupt self serving morrass of grubby chums chosen because they were either unable to challenge him due to his knowledge of them that controlled them or because they were too stupid.

Here is Christopher Gill’s commendation:

As a recently elected member of the NEC I have been dismayed by what I have found at this level within the party. UKIP lacks basic democracy and transparency. Answers to questions have not been forthcoming yet the job of the NEC should be to ask questions and get answers on behalf of the members. I most certainly do not have control over our finances, structure or publicity despite this being my role under the Constitution.


I would urge all UKIP members to vote. Our party will be open to ridicule if the future Leader is elected on a poor turnout. How can we appeal to the British public to vote UKIP if our membership ignores this opportunity to improve the image of the party?


Ideally the new Leader and the new image will embrace radical change and look outwards, not inwards. Detailed policies are vital but must sit beneath an over-arching concept of libertarian values. I also feel that UKIP must, when forming policy, have the courage to talk of issues as diverse as: quality of life, the aesthetics of our environment, fair trade and free speech. Big ideas will appeal to voters. At present we only have little ideas; no wonder our critics call us ‘little Englanders’.


I feel that Richard Suchorzewski will try to change UKIP and change is essential. I would also urge UKIP members not to think in the short term. The new Leader will need continued pressure and support from the membership in the next year to bring about change.


So, here is an opportunity for the membership to reform this party. Please take it by voting for Richard.

What a tragedy that Farage went on to destroy the party and was helped in that corruption and dishonesty by Christopher Gill in the end! He brought shame on his name when he had every opportunity to bring so much to these United Kingdoms had he not sold out to Farage and dishonesty.

Even then in July 2006 McGough was desperate to maintain the corruption with underhand and dishonest attacks on Suchorzewski.
TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Farage; Croucher; Christopher Gill; Gill; Observer; Bertie: | Leave a Comment »

#682* – SO TheBNP HAS SOME EUkip ADDRESSES – WHAT A SURPRISE!

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/10/2009

#682* – SO TheBNP HAS SOME EUkip ADDRESSES – WHAT A SURPRISE!

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!
SO TheBNP HAS SOME EUkip ADDRESSES – WHAT A SURPRISE! Tat Gerard BATTEN RUNS TO THE ICO IS STAGGERING AFTER EUkip’s SERIAL OFFENCES UNDER THE ACT!

BNP leader ‘paid for UKIP member list’

Daniel Foggo and Jon Ungoed-Thomas

NICK GRIFFIN is to be investigated by the privacy watchdog after the BNP leader was accused of paying for a database containing the names and addresses of thousands of members of a rival party.


The database, which belonged to the UK Independence party and contained the details of about 3,500 of its members from London and the southeast, was passed to the British National party by a disaffected member in return for about £500, sources say.


The BNP then canvassed many of the people on the UKIP list asking for funds to help fight its campaign in the run-up to June’s European elections. The BNP went on to claim two seats, including one for Griffin.


Last night the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which oversees data protection, said it would investigate. Under the terms of the Data Protection Act, anyone who sells data without authorisation from the designated “data controller” is guilty of an offence, as is the person who obtains it.


Related Links
‘Nick Griffin, a triumph of political correctness’
Griffin seeks part in leaders’ TV debate
Shady past of the party bodyguards
If prosecuted and found guilty, transgressors are liable to a fine of up to £5,000. The Ministry of Justice is consulting about whether to impose custodial sentences for future breaches.


Griffin said yesterday that he had never personally paid for a UKIP membership list, although he conceded that some UKIP details had been passed to his party by former members.


He added: “To the best of my knowledge, no one in the party has paid for such a list.


“Some UKIP members do join us and provide names and addresses of people who might be interested to hear from us. We have never had an entire UKIP membership list.”


Last week Griffin said the anonymous leaking on a website of his own party’s membership — the second time it has happened in the past 12 months — was part of a “concerted anti-BNP campaign”.


One of the names on the leaked UKIP database was Gerard Batten, an MEP for the party, who has previously complained to the ICO about the apparent data breach. Last night he said he was preparing a fresh complaint based on The Sunday Times’s evidence that the database had been bought and sold.


“We have long suspected the BNP had a [UKIP] membership list. Our members don’t want this stuff. The BNP do this based on the false belief they can take away some of our members,” he said.


Batten and others received unsolicited requests for donations from the BNP from 2008 until earlier this year. One sent in January appealed for funds for the BNP’s European election battle. It said: “If we can win one seat, the floodgates will open. One seat, just one, would put us on the world stage and would lead to an avalanche of popular support throughout this country.”


Last year Batten wrote to the ICO: “I suspect that my address and those of our UKIP London members were illegally accessed from a UKIP database.”


Now other sources, including from within the BNP, have confirmed that the database was obtained and exploited by the party. “Nick Griffin bought the database for surprisingly little, just a few hundred pounds,” said a source.


It is understood that the privacy watchdog wrote to the BNP warning it not to send Batten any more communications. But the source said the watchdog did not know the party also had the names and addresses of 3,500 other UKIP members.


An ICO spokesman said: “We are very concerned to hear that some UKIP members’ personal details have apparently been traded with the BNP. We will investigate this incident to establish the full facts.


“Buying or selling personal data is against the law, unless there is a public interest defence.”


Gerry Gable, publisher of the anti-fascist magazine Searchlight, said: “The BNP jump up and down when their own membership lists are leaked, but it now emerges they are procuring the details of members of another party in an underhand way.”

To view the original article CLICK HERE
Gerry Gable offers a doctrine of hatred and left wing neo fascist denial of democracy with his UAF storm troops and network of informers – intimidation and bullying are just a part of his doctrine of hate. Not above destruction of public meetings, breaking and entering to plant or steal ‘claimed’ evidence.

The gutter of British politics funded clandestinely and overtly by corrupt sources in left wing neo communist politics.

MY COMMENT TO THE SUNDAY TIMES:
Hi,

I’m quite miffed – I thought the full mailing list sent to me shortly after Mark Croucher accessed the party servers and the chairman and general secretary were mailing them around unprotected – despite the letter admonishing them for lax data protection, was of more value than that!

I wonder if TheBNP localised list was as inaccurate as EUkip’s own full list where I have found that about 20% of the members are no longer supporters.

I get regular updates of the data sent anonimously by those seeking to get UKIP back on the rails rather than the corrupt feifdom of its leader and surrounding paid praise singers.

Perhaps EUkip is trying to set up one of its loyal members and pretend he is BNP as they have done in the past – especially now that Croucher is back as an official spokesman in Brussels, this speaks volumes of the new face of EUkip!

We all note their lurch towards a pan EU political party structure with the extremist, violent racists, xenophobes, anti Jewish and sexually intollerant partners in the EFD who make Britain’s vile BNP look mild in comparison.

So it was GUILTY of accepting false donations but even more guilty of antagonising the Electoral Commission and the Courts deliberately.

Mr. Foggo can verify my facts as can my blog.

Every Country has its vile football hooligans, low lifes and BNPesque racists vile as they may be there is an integrity in their behaviour, but there is something truely sordid about electing Caesar’s wife to clear the Augean stables and then like EUkip find her turning tricks behind the marble pillars with minders and procurers funded by taxes!

Clearly in view of the laxity and disregard for the Data protection act of EUkip even posting training videos toYouTube to mock and ridecule members who seek to expose their corruption we now find the sad Gerald Batten seeking protection from the very body they so abused – this is no way for even pretend politicians to behave surely!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
http://greglancewatkins.blogspot.com/

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Data Protection; Gerard Batten; ICO; TheBNP; Mailing Lists; | Leave a Comment »

#681* – EUkip STORY ILL JUDGED & SHODDY JOURNALISM

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 25/10/2009

#681* – EUkip STORY ILL JUDGED & SHODDY JOURNALISM

Clean EUkip up NOW & make UKIP electable!

The corruption of some of EUkip’s leadership, their anti UKIP claque & the NEC is what gives the remaining 10% a bad name!

EUkip STORY ILL JUDGED & SHODDY JOURNALISM by Michael CRICK & THE GULLIBLE COPYIST Christopher BOOKER!

AN EDITORIAL ADDITION WAS MADE AT 18:20hrs. see my second letter below.

AN EDITORIAL ADDITION WAS MADE AT 23:20hrs. see additions below.

Ukip faces bankruptcy after Electoral Commission appeal
There is a startling contrast between the treatment of Ukip and the Lib Dems in cases involving party donations, says Christopher Booker


By Christopher Booker
Published: 8:16PM BST 24 Oct 2009




Thomas Hardy fans will be familiar with the “Skimmington ride”. This was the old practice whereby, when someone had affronted communal morality, a mob would gather outside the culprit’s house to make a loud noise by banging pots and pans together while shouting abuse. Such an unlovely spectacle was the Skimmington conducted by Thursday evening’s Question Time, happily diverting attention from several rather more important issues of the day, such as the suicide of the Royal Mail. These might even have included the fact that, for the first time in history, a British political party, rather more popular and respectable than the BNP, may have to close down, following a court ruling which threatens it with bankruptcy.


A neat summary of some of the illogicalities behind the Appeal Court’s ruling that the UK Independence Party, with 13 MEPs, must hand over £750,000 for a trivial breach of electoral law, was provided on his blog by the BBC’s diligent political reporter Michael Crick.


As “Case A”, he described how, in 2005, Ukip received donations amounting to £363,607 from a bookmaker, Alan Bown. Mr Bown had a legitimate business and had for years been on the electoral register where he lives in Kent. But, due to an oversight, his name had not been included on the register for the year when he gave the money. In 2007, when the Electoral Commission tracked this down, a district judge ruled that Ukip should pay £18,000 as a penalty for failing to check whether Mr Bown’s name was on the register. This was not good enough for the Commission, which appealed, demanding that all Mr Bown’s donations must be confiscated. When the Appeal Court last week supported the Commission, this left Ukip with a legal bill amounting to £750,000 which it hasn’t got, thus facing it with bankruptcy.


Mr Crick then presented “Case B”, concerning Michael Brown, whose donation of £2.4 million was the largest ever enjoyed by the Liberal Democrats. Mr Brown made his gift through a highly dodgy company called 5th Avenue Partners. In 2008, before being found guilty on £10 million fraud charges, he changed his name, grew a beard, he skipped bail and moved to Spain. The Electoral Commission, having investigated this murky story, found that the Lib Dems had accepted the donation in “good faith” (even though it came from a company built on fraud), and seems unwilling to take further action.


The Political Parties, Elections & Referendums Act 2000, which the Electoral Commission was enforcing, was based on a report by the eminent lawyer Lord Neill of Bladen, whose concern, over donations, was that they should come from legitimate sources, not be anonymous, and should not be from people living abroad. In the cases of Bown and Brown, one was an honest Englishman, running a legitimate business whose only mistake was a minor error of paperwork; the other is a very shady character who, having been caught out running a business built on fraud, now lives anonymously abroad.


On which party, asked Mr Crick, do we think the Electoral Commission came down like a ton of bricks? Apart from the Lib Dems, of course, no one will have rejoiced more at last week’s verdict than the Conservative Party. One of the Tories’ biggest fears, since Ukip came second in this year’s Euro-elections with 2.5 million votes, has been that many otherwise natural Tories might be tempted to vote for Ukip again in next year’s general election – not just as Euro-sceptics frustrated by Mr Cameron’s weaselly line on the EU, but in protest against the degradation of all our main parties by the allowances scandals.


If Ukip is forced out of play, many such voters will stay at home. The only electoral beneficiaries of the court’s ruling could thus be the BNP, who, however disreputable themselves, might well win rather more protest votes against the squalid antics of our “political class” than they would have received otherwise.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

FIRST: May I draw attention to the fact that EUkip does NOT face bankruptcy over this matter – the first foolish mistake in the article – as written in to the 2008 accounts as lodged is the statement from the auditors that:
There is a pending risk of liability under legal liability before the Courts in the matter of impremissable donations and that Mr. Alan Bown has undertaken to pay the sum and the costs should the Courts find against EUkip.

May I also point out that under the Constitution The NEC accepts the liability for the debts of the party both jointly and severally a condition, duty and liability that pre dates their obscenely costly incorporation as a Limited Company.

My Comment to The Sunday Telegraph was quite long enough without adding those passing details!

Here is a copy of my comment:
Hi,

I have been something of a fan of Christopher Booker from his early days as a script writer for the seminal TW3, through Private Eye and now a regular in The Sunday Telegraph neither here nor in his books, many with Dr. Richard North, have let down the reader so badly as this article.

This is almost as sloppy a piece of journalism as was that of Michael Crick – Booker you are not the office junior doing re-writes from the worthy you are an investigative journalist – why did you check none of your facts?

I am aware of every step of the way in this case from my first warning the past Treasurer John de Roeke as he has publicly confirmed, the then chairman David Lott and the effective leader of the day Nigel Farage that Alan Bown had permitted himself to be struck off the electoral roll for ‘marital’ reasons.

I advised them that they should repay the money, as they had done with the earlier donation by Sir Jack Haywood of Wolves. & have it repaid either through one of Alan Bown’s legitimate companies (I was unaware of the donations through one of his unregistered companies, at the time!).

Sir Jack Hayward’s Lady wife repaid EUkip the shortfall – thus de Roeke engineered 3 excellent and very beneficial press coverages based upon the single donation and EUkip’s THEN probity.

The Electoral Commission made some 13 telephone & written communications seeking to assist in regularisation.

They even had face to face meetings and EUkip saw fit to make deliberate decisions to insult and antagonise the Official Regulator.

Would EUkip advocate that all laws should be broken by those who can get away with it, if we were unfortunate enough to see them elected?

Eventually after exploring every avenue The Electoral Commission were forced to bring the matter to Court where even on the steps EUkip & Bown would have been permitted to take all parties to lunch and obtain the good publicity of rotating cheques to regularise the matter but no – like a small spoilt child Farage led his hapless band OVER the precipice and even then Judge Tim Workshop showed both wisdom and leniency to the satisfaction of all concerned.

It was only in the aftermath of the court case and rapped knuckles with a ‘contrived’ forfeiture of a mere £18,000 that EUkip were led to destruction by the insults and braggadocio of their leadership cocking a snoot at the Courts and Electoral Commission to such an extent that it could not be reasonably tollerated.

Oh why did you not carry out the very simplest of checks with due dilligence Christopher as to build a reputation for veracity takes years and this second foolish foray makes you look like a man cuckolded by his lover!

Your earlier betrayal of your own standards was over the discreditted Marta Andreasen where you were too blinded by the beauty of the story to let facts get in the way.

Please assure us you have not ignored the facts to bring us the stories of Snatch Vehicles in Iraq, poor policies in Afghanistan, idiocy and betrayal in The EU, duplicity in Governance and more recently that you have not overlooked the facts to write a good yarn on climate and temperature changes and the mendacity of Social Services and The Family Courts.

It is a simple matter to find the full written judgement AGAINST Marta Andreasen on my blog at:
http://CaterpillarsAnd Butterflies.blogspot.com

It was also a simple matter for me to confirm, knowing the details and dishonesty of Andrew Smith, whose ‘e’Mail was published in this paper some years ago I believe or in the rival paper which seems to acquire many of this paper’s better journalists! (Who check their facts!)

I found my conversations with the Electoral Commission informative over the years as was my long conversation when confirming the story you copied from Michael Crick was bunkum – a simple matter of a phone call to an executive in The Lib.Dems. and access to their silk for comment.

Perhaps to help your readers we can enlighted:
The £2.4M. donation was NOT from Michael Brown as you carelessly copied but from his Company 5th. Avenue Partners – unlike the company that made donations to EUkip for Alan Bown 5th. Avenue Partners was a legitimately registered Company in Britain.

Unlike EUkip the Lib.Dems.  (Electoral Commission correction) did ‘due dilligence’ checks above and beyond those called for under law. The company showed as squeeky clean to these checks even to the checks with their bankers of sufficient solvency and legitimacy before presenting the cheque for payment.

The matter was passed, at the end of the allowed 30 days to the Electoral Commission who made absolutely no querie until some time later AFTER a serious fraud office enquiry commenced when The Lib.Dems. were asked to co-operate with the police, which they did.

I understand it would not be too great a stretch to claim that without The Lib.Dims. meticulous files and internal transparency of accounts aided by The Electoral Commission the case against 5th. Avenue Partners and Mr. Michael Brown might not have been so strong as despite the puff & blow of the Government money laundering laws are like so many others that this Government and their EU cronies have devised are just down right shoddy and fail to address the problems for which they are designed particularly with Ponzi type scams as was seemingly the Brown 5th.Ave.Ptnrs. case.

Sadly Christopher Booker you have been shoddy and unprofessional and without even the charm and skirl of a Spanish skirt!

I can obviously provide a great deal more factual information Christopher and am as happy to do so now as when I cautioned on this story from the very start.

I’m so glad I hold the evidence that confirms the story of ‘Janet’ which you have written up brilliantly and can be followed in full at:
http://stolenkids-sads.blogspot.com/ which will shortly include the re-submission to the lower Courts and an outline of The Bundle for The Human Rights Courts together with a privately obtained 6 page escorriation of the handling of the case by a leading custody consultant of world reknown.

Perhaps recovery from the culture shock of a fortnight in India has damaged judgement 😉

Regards,
Greg L-W.
A UKIP supporter
&
Booker Fan of VERY MANY YEARS standing!

Here is another comment!

Mr Booker has completely destroyed his credibility after writing this. I really thought he had more sense than to fall for the Farage spin machine.

UKIP had every chance to rectify their ‘mistake’ but they ignored all of Elcom’s warnings.

Andrew Smith, UKIP�s treasurer at the time, even advised in an email that UKIP mislead Elcom.

Farage then publicly attacked Elcom at a UKIP conference.

Why should we feel any sympathy for Farage? If you break the law you pay the price.


John West


on October 24, 2009 at 11:14 PM

AN EDITORIAL ADDITION WAS MADE AT 18:20hrs. see my second letter below.

I made a further comment on the original article web site in response to other comments made – all of which can be seen at: CLICK HERE
Hi,

Tom Collins is confused when he asks:

How Greg Lance Watkins can call himself a UKIP Supporter, after his vicious diatribe, is beyond me.

But he is VERY Confused when he claims:

The admin.staff at UKIP made an error over a post code address !
That’s all.

If only it was a simple error but clearly it was not as I showed in brief, it was a series of very clear and deliberate decisions by several EUkip executives acting in concert AGAINST the best interests of UKIP members, supporters and these United Kingdoms.

EUkip is of course the party where Derek Clark MEP on Farage’s instruction signed an agreement that Britain would be subject to GREATER Subsidiarity to The EU and that EUkip would work WITH The EU to STRENGTHEN its control over Britain and other vassal states!

I am a dedicated supporter of UKIP wishing Britain to excercise our basic human right of ‘Self Determination’ in freedom through our own accountable Westminster GOVERNMENT not a rubber stamping office of parasites fiddling their expenses.

I as do UKIP members wish Britain to leave The EU and be a self governing global trading Nation.

I totally repudiate the actions of what is EUkip with its alliances with racists, xenophobes, anti Jewish, sexually intollerant, violent bigots as ‘chums’ to form a Pan EU Political Party (masked as the EFD group).

I also repudiate EUkip’s endemic bullying, dishonesty and blatant corruption.

JeremyT has got it right when he claims:
This is a curious judgement

Indeed it is at a glance but when one realises due to deliberate chosen decisions EUkip forced The Electoral Commission and The Courts to this decision it becomes less ‘curious’.

Indeed Alan Bown is the party penalised as EUkip’s accounts clearly show the party as potentially facing the financial liability which the auditors attest is covered by an undertaking by Alan Bown to pay the forfeiture and such costs as are incurred!

Little wonder that Farage and his placemen have seen fit to make a series of utterly idiotic choices to seemingly deliberately exacerbate a situation which the authorities made effort after effort to resolve amicably to UKIP’s advantage.

It is not so much a ‘curious’ judgement as perverse behaviour from EUkip and to whose advantage one is forced to ask oneself as it sure to hell is not of benefit to Britain, the people at large nor members and supporters of UKIP – so very deliberately distanced from EUkip by abuse and obfuscation.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

 AN EDITORIAL ADDITION WAS MADE AT 23:20hrs 25-Oct-2009. see additions below.

I note the following comment made which sadly I am unable to refute – though I do not know ‘Bert’ he seems very well informed and depressingly accurate from EUkip’s viewpoint as they seek to obfuscate by ‘ad hominem attack’ being unable to bring facts to bear – one need only note the unsound and inaccurate comment of Robert Feel Martinis who recently, due to ill health and dishonesty lost his platform and his route to The Gravy Train he craved!

Bert’s comments follow:
1. Why does UKIP refuse to publish its MEPs� EU expense claims? It is hypocritical that UKIP should condemn the EU for failing to sign off its accounts while refusing to detail its MEPs� use of taxpayers� funds.


2. When will Farage publish his expense claims so that voters may learn how he has claimed �2,000,000 in 10 years? What is he hiding? Even Tory MEP5 now publish their EU expense accounts.


3. What happened to UKIP supporters� donations? Between 2003-5, nearly 90% of donations into UKIP�s Ashford Call Centre disappeared in administration costs. Another �200,000+ disappeared in Farage�s SE Region in �other costs� (see Electoral Commission website). Demands for audits have been rejected by Farage. Why? What is being hidden?


4. On 27.1.05, why did UKIP MEP5 vote to support a motion whose subtext called for �closer political, economic and social integration� with the EU, for brainwashing in schools and for the outlawing of �xenophobia�, a thought-crime defined by the EU as merely an aversion to the Euro? UKIP MEPs, who breached their own party constitution, neither apologised nor renounced this treachery.


5. Why, in early 2007, did UKIP MEP Derek Clark sign an agreement in Bucharest endorsing subsidiarity and the Common Agricultural Policy? Roger Knapman, ex UKIP leader, refused to accept such a �. . .major departure from what we believed to be UKIP�s policy � withdrawal from the EU, a complete rejection of its authority and of the CAP. Subsidiarity is an EU doctrine which assumes EU sovereignty. . . Accepting subsidiarity accepts ultimate EU sovereignty.�


6. On 29.2.08 a press statement from Farage condemned the Labour Government for discriminating in favour of Eastern Europeans immigration at the expense of non white immigration from Africa and Asia! What is the point in wishing to preserve the nation state from the EU when, as a result of multiculturalism and Afro-Asian immigration, there will be no nation within the state left to preserve in 40years?


7. Why does Farage receive more appearances on BBC Question Time than any Cabinet Minster? Could part of the answer lie in a press conference when Farage stated that the only means to defeat the BNP was to vote UKIP? In 10 years, UKIP has wasted �millions in taxpayers� funding and private donations; money that has been sidelined into a politically-correct dead end, just like all the efforts of UKIPs� well-meaning members.


8. Why does the foreign Marta Andreasen (Farage�s number two in the SE) merely desire reform of the EU and not withdrawal?


Bert
on October 25, 2009
at 06:46 PM

Now we have the absurd and ill informed comments of one John MacKei who is clearly no associate of the truth or even facts!

Greg Lance-Watkins 07:07 AM


I can see why Nigel Farage was so keen to get rid of you. You’re utterly barmy !


Paolo Caldato 07:12 AM


You’re not mad, just very spiteful – and you don’t understand about the principle of the judiciary interpreting legislation.


The judiciary are required to take great account of what Parliament meant when it passes particular laws; in this case the intention was set out very clearly in Booker’s article.


As the UKIP / Bown case does not fit principle – as clearly laid out in this article – there should have never been a question of them being found in breach of the law, it being a trivial and inconsequential ‘hiccup’ in an administrative process.


Thus, for the Judge to find against UKIP is, to put it mildly, extraordinary.


Clearly there is more influencing the judge than logical application of the law. The fact that UKIP are ‘anti-establishment’ makes the ruling seem like far too much of a coincidence – especially in light of the Liberal Democrats being able to hold on to the proceeds of a serious crime(s).

John Mackie
on October 25, 2009
at 09:26 PM

Hi,

It does seem John MacKie at 09:26PM is no confidant of Farage’s as even Farage would not promote such a claim.

I NEVER joined UKIP – I had no interest in office merely in Britain leaving The EU.

Farage did NOT get rid of me as you so misguidedly claim – I gave Farage the undertaking to support him in any reasonable way as an MEP, officer or any secondary post as the informed will know. (You can easily verrify this if you know any of his dwindling honest staff of the period.[Addition])

I also informed him and others that he could count on my implacable opposition if he ever tried to become leader as I believed he would as leader destroy UKIP as he lacked Officer Qualities or leadership ability and was without gravitas or the required integrity.

How right I was.

As for your understanding of the law in the matter of The Electoral Commission I guess the Telegraph is a little better than a corn flake packet or the advice EUkip has received.

With respect sir you are utterly wrong in how the £3/4Million debt was incurred but why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy story.

IF you can manage to be more rational and consider FACTS do call me and chat through what you have been led to believe because clearly it is untrue.

By all means record the conversation and take it to Silk to have it checked for accuracy.

Have you actually read the law in this matter?

In the light of the letter and spirit of the law as drafted and enacted you will find Judge Tim Workshop’s attempt to ameliorate the original forfeiture was most brave of him and was acceptable to the plaintiff.

It was only the foolish insults by the defendants that forced The Judge into the embarrassment of Judicial Review where it was made most clear he had permitted of a leniency not within his remit.

Rather than hurl unfounded insults based on a lack of facts why not establish the facts with some responsibility.

Mr. MacKenzie since you have seen fit to impugne my sanity yet can not provide one shred of evidence to support your dishonesty perhaps you could act honourably and withdraw your claim and appologise.

Then perhaps you would care to call me and bring some balance to your ill informed accusations even as made against The Judiciary and Her Majesty’s Courts.

Regards,
Greg L-W.

TO LEAVE THE EU

What is the exit and survival plan for these United Kingdoms to maximise on the many benefits of leaving The EU. It is the DUTY of our Politicians and Snivil Cervants to ensure the continuity, liberty and right to self determination of our peoples they have a DUTY to protect against crime and secure both our food and our border.

NONE of these DUTIES has a single British politician upheld for 40 years. They have drawn their incomes fraudulently and dishonesty.

Politicians are failing to tell the truth, but so are almost all wanabe Politicians, the MSM and Snivil Cervants.

The fact is that even if EVERY British MEP wanted change in The EU it would achieve NOTHING.
Every single British Politician, of EVERY Party, elected since before we joined the EUropean Common Market, has promised to change The EU’s CAP – In 40 Years they have achieved absolutely NOTHING!

To try to put a value on OUR Freedom is as futile as floccipaucinihilipilification and as odious as the metissage of our societies, as we rummage in the ashes of our ancestors dreams, sacrifices and achievements, the flotsam of our hopes and the jetsam of our lives, consider the Country and Anglosphere which we thus leave our children and the future, with shame!

Regards,
Greg L-W.
01291 – 62 65 62

PLEASE POST THIS TAG AS FOLLOWS:ON YOUR eMAILS & BLOGS, FORUM POSTINGS & MAILINGS – GET THE MESSAGE TO THE PEOPLE IT IS OUR BEST HOPE AS WHOEVER IS APPOINTED WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE AS PROVED!

I SUGGEST – since there is clearly no political party of repute, advocating or campaigning for withdrawal of these United Kingdoms from the EU and restoration of our independent sovereign, democracy, with Justice & the right to self determination in a free country. Deny the self seeking & meaningless wanabe MEPs the Mythical Mandate for which they clamour. Diktat is imposed from The EU but Law should be made at Westminster, for our Country & our Peoples.

Write Upon Your Ballot Paper at EVERY election:

LEAVE THE EU
to
GET YOUR COUNTRY BACK

Posted in EUkip; UKIP; Farage; Electoral Commission; El.Com.; Michael CRICK; Christopher BOOKER; BOOKER; Richard NORTH; | Leave a Comment »

 
%d bloggers like this: